Long gap esophageal atresia: lengthening technique and primary anastomosis

Objective

The treatment of long gap esophageal atresia remains a major surgical challenge. The authors describe a modification of a lengthening technique based on tissue expansion to avoid sutures cutting through the esophagus.

Methods

Between January 2004 and August 2006, 4 patients did not respond to stretching, and underwent this modified esophageal lengthening technique using silastic tubes.

Results and Follow-up

All infants recovered and have an intact esophagus. All infants developed gastroesophageal reflux. Thal antireflux procedure was performed in the first infant. The other 3 patients were managed conservatively. Follow-up ranged between 6 and 34 months.

Conclusions

The tissue expansion principle can be successfully applied in the esophagus through external traction. Silastic tube fixation at esophageal ends may help to apply even traction and avoid sutures cutting through the esophageal tissue.     

High incidence of catheter-associated venous thromboembolic events in patients with long gap esophageal atresia treated with the Foker process

Purpose

To determine the incidence of catheter-associated venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) patients treated at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) and to identify possible risk factors associated with their development.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of LGEA patients from 2005 to 2012. Symptomatic VTEs with radiographic confirmation were defined as events. Potential risk factors were assessed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Covariates included age, weight, initial gap length, cumulative days of pharmacologic paralysis and paralytic episodes, number and type of central venous catheters (CVCs), and number of operations.

Results

Forty-four LGEA patients were identified. The incidence of CVC associated VTE was 34%. Univariate analysis identified age at Foker 1 (P = .03), paralysis duration (P = .01), episodes of paralysis (P = .001), cumulative number of CVC (P = .007) and length of stay (P = .03) as significant. Multivariate logistic regression identified the number of paralytic episodes as the only significant independent risk factor for VTE (P < .0001).

Conclusions

The incidence of symptomatic VTE was 34%, significantly higher than the VTE incidence of 4.5% reported for our other hospitalized children. These data have led to multidisciplinary discussions regarding thromboprophylaxis and development of a consensus-driven protocol. Since the initiation of this protocol, no VTEs have been identified.     

Multistaged esophageal elongation technique for long gap esophageal atresia: experience with 7 cases at a single institution

Background/Purpose

Esophageal reconstruction for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still controversial. We successfully managed 7 cases of patients with LGEA by doing staged elongation of the native esophagus and subsequent end-to-end anastomosis. The technique and efficacy of this procedure are evaluated.

Methods

During the last 10 years, 7 patients with LGEA (Gross type A, 5; B, 1; C, 1) underwent multiple extrathoracic esophageal elongations (ETEEs) of the upper esophagus and subsequent esophagoesophagostomy. Medical records were reviewed in regard to the number of ETEE before definitive esophageal reconstruction, interval between each ETEE, operation time, time before initiation of sham feeding, duration of hospital stay, and complications.

Results

The definitive esophageal reconstruction was successfully achieved without major complications in all patients after 2 to 4 stages of ETEE. The interval between each ETEE was 72 days on average. The average operation time was 98 minutes. The elongation was 1 to 3.5 cm during each session. Oral sham feeding was recommenced 4.1 days after each ETEE, and the hospital stay was 9.6 days on average. Gastroesophageal reflux occurred in all patients, requiring antireflux surgery.

Conclusions

We conclude from our experience (a) that effective esophageal lengthening with preservation of the native esophagus was achieved with multiple ETEE in LGEA and (b) that this procedure allows oral sham feeding at home until esophageal reconstruction.     

Early results of an objective feedback-directed system for the staged traction repair of long-gap esophageal atresia

Purpose

Treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia challenges pediatric surgeons. Dr. Foker described utilization of external traction sutures to promote in-vivo growth through tension-induced lengthening, but reproducibility of this technique is difficult. We describe a safe and reproducible traction system using transduction of hydrostatic pressure as a surrogate for tension.

Methods

We conducted a multi-institutional review of patients treated with this system from 2005 to 2012. All children had sutures applied to both pouches with continuous measurement of associated hydrostatic pressures (tension). Main outcome measures were days to delayed primary repair and thoracotomies prior to primary repair.

Results

Seven children were included. Median time to delayed repair was 15 days (range: 6–47 days). Three patients required repeat thoracotomies owing to mechanical entrapment of a pouch, all identified early by this system. All required postoperative dilations. Three had self-limited postdilation leaks, and there was one operation-related leak.

Conclusions

This system provides reproducible traction application, facilitating staged primary repair by preventing major failures through limiting excessive traction and guides re-exploration for trapped segments. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal tension protocol, prevent postoperative leaks, while decreasing the need for dilations and time to enteral feeding.     

Evolution of left-sided thoracoscopic approach for long gap esophageal atresia repair

BackgroundLeft-sided repair for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) has been described for patients with a large leftward upper pouch, no thoracic tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) nor tracheobronchomalacia (TBM), or as salvage plan after prior failed right-sided repair. We describe our experience with left-sided MIS traction induced growth process.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Foker process for LGEA at two institutions between December 2016 and November 2021. Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were reviewed.Results71 patients underwent Foker process. Of 34 MIS cases, 28 patients (82%) underwent left-sided repair (median gap length 5 cm) at median age 4 months with median 3 (range 2–8) operations and median 13.5 (IQR 11–21) days on traction until esophageal anastomosis. 9 patients (32%) underwent completely MIS approach, whereas 5 patients (18%) converted to open at first operation and 14 patients (50%) converted to open later in the traction process. Traction was internal in 68%, external in 11%, and combination in 21%. Median follow-up was 15.4 (IQR 7.5–31.7) months after anastomosis. 14% had anastomotic leak managed with antibiotics and/or esophageal vacuum therapy. Median number of esophageal dilations was 3.5 (range 0–13). 18% required stricture resection. 39% underwent Nissen fundoplication. None have needed esophageal replacement.ConclusionsFor multiple reasons including the tendency of both esophageal pouches to have a leftward bias, less tracheal compression by upper pouch, and clean field of surgery for reoperative cases, we now more commonly use left-sided approach for MIS LGEA repair compared to right side, regardless of left aortic arch.Level of evidenceLevel IV Treatment Study.