Dose escalation study of carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer by two phase I/II clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1995 and January 2000, 44 patients were treated with CIRT. Thirty patients had Stage IIIB disease, and 14 patients had Stage IVA disease. Median tumor size was 6.5 cm (range, 4.2-11.0 cm). The treatment consisted of 16 fractions of whole pelvic irradiation and 8 fractions of local boost. In the first study, the total dose ranged from 52.8 to 72.0 gray equivalents (GyE) (2.2-3.0 GyE per fraction). In the second study, the whole pelvic dose was fixed at 44.8 GyE, and an additional 24.0 or 28.0 GyE was given to the cervical tumor (total dose, 68.8 or 72.8 GyE). RESULTS: No patient developed severe acute toxicity. In contrast, 8 patients developed major late gastrointestinal complications. The doses resulting in major complications were > or =60 GyE. All patients with major complications were surgically salvaged. The 5-year local control rate for patients in the first and second studies was 45% and 79%, respectively. When treated with > or =62.4 GyE, the local control was favorable even for the patients with stage IVA disease (69%) or for those with tumors > or =6.0 cm (64%). CONCLUSIONS: In CIRT for advanced cervical cancer, the dose to the intestines should be limited to <60 GyE to avoid major complications. Although the number of patients in this study was small, the results support continued investigation to confirm therapeutic efficacy.     

Dose escalation study of carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer in a Phase I/II dose escalation clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1994 and January 1997, 36 patients with locally advanced, histologically proven, and new or recurrent cancer of the head and neck were treated with carbon ions. A dose escalation study was conducted, delivering 18 fractions through 6 weeks for 17 patients (Group A) and 16 fractions through 4 weeks for 19 patients (Group B). Eligibility and ineligibility criteria were the same in both groups. The dosages were escalated in increments of 10% after careful observation of at least 3 patients treated with the same dosages. The endpoints of the study were a Grade 3 reaction of the skin and the mucous membrane or local control of the tumors. RESULTS: Follow-up time ranged from 77 to 108 months with a median of 90 months. Grade 3 acute reaction of the skin was detected in 1 of the 2 patients in Group A who were treated with 70.2 GyE/18 fractions/6 weeks. In Group B, Grade 3 acute skin reaction was detected in 20% (1/5), 27% (2/11), and 67% (2/3) patients treated with 52.8 GyE, 57.6 GyE, and 64.0 GyE through 16 fractions for 4 weeks, respectively. There was only 1 patient with a Grade 3 acute reaction of the mucous membrane. Only 1 patient developed a Grade 2 late reaction of the mucous membrane (superficial ulcer), which was located close to the tumor. No other Grade 2 or greater late reaction was noted until the time of analysis. Acute tumor reactions in 34 patients consisted of 10 patients of complete response 19 of partial response, 4 of no change, and 1 of progressive disease. Local control of 34 patients calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 75% at 5 years. Five years' local control of five malignant melanomas showed 100%, and that of 9 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma was 90%. Also, local control of 8 patients of salivary glands and 4 patients of ears was 100% at 56 months and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The dose fractionation methods of 70.2 GyE through 18 fractions for 6 weeks and 64.0 GyE through 16 fractions for 4 weeks showed equal clinical outcome in terms of morbidity and local control. The outcome of carbon ion radiotherapy showed a specific effectiveness in local control of non-squamous cell carcinoma such as adenoid cystic carcinomas and malignant melanomas. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that carbon ion radiotherapy will deliver a high local control rate without unacceptable injuries to the surrounding normal tissues.     

Preliminary results of radiation dose escalation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of dose escalation in tumor for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 2000 to June 2004, 50 patients with T3-T4 NPC were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Fourteen patients had Stage III and 36 patients had Stage IVA-IVB disease. The prescribed dose was 76 Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV), 70 Gy to planning target volume (PTV), and 72 Gy to enlarged neck nodes (GTVn). All doses were given in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Thirty-four patients also had concurrent cisplatin and induction or adjuvant PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). RESULTS: The average mean dose achieved in GTV, GTVn, and PTV were 79.5 Gy, 75.3 Gy, and 74.6 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months, with 4 recurrences: 2 locoregional and 2 distant failures. All patients with recurrence had IMRT alone without chemotherapy. The 2-year locoregional control rate, distant metastases-free and disease-free survivals were 95.7%, 94.2%, and 93.1%, respectively. One treatment-related death caused by adjuvant chemotherapy occurred. The 2-year overall survival was 92.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to 76 Gy in tumor is feasible with T3-T4 NPC and can be combined with chemotherapy. Initial results showed good local control and survival.     

Pions--the potential for therapeutic gain in locally advanced prostate cancer: dose escalation and toxicity studies

Since 1982, 49 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate have been treated with pion radiotherapy in tolerance and tumor response studies. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was confirmed as 1.5 for both acute and late effects, a figure expected on the basis of animal and human studies. The radiation dose has been safely escalated to tolerance, which is estimated to be 37.5 Gy pi in 15 fractions (volume less than 500 cc), and 36 Gy pi in 15 fractions (volume 500-800 cc). Severe acute toxicity occurred in 6% and severe chronic toxicity in 4%, figures comparable to those seen with conventional radiotherapy. The equivalent photon doses are approximately 78 Gy in 39 fractions and 73 Gy in 36 fractions, respectively. That this high dose can be delivered with no increase in toxicity is a reflection of smaller volume radiotherapy achieved by exploiting the dose distribution and biological characteristics of pions. Local response rates of 94% are reported. A Phase III study is now under way.     

Dose escalation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective randomised study

AimsTo investigate prospectively the feasibility and efficacy of dose escalation using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) boost technique for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a randomised study.Materials and methodsThirty-six patients with locally recurrent NPC (>6 months interval from previous radical radiotherapy, no cervical lymph-node involvement and no distant metastasis) were enrolled. Treatment included conventional external-beam radiotherapy to 54 Gy, followed by a 3D-CRT boost to the gross tumour region. Patients were randomised to three boost dose levels: 16 Gy, 20 Gy and 24 Gy for groups I, II and III, respectively, with 12 patients in each group. All boost doses were delivered in 4-Gy fractions and 3 fractions per week. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 14–44 months).ResultsThree-year, local-recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher (72%) for the high-dose group III than for groups I and II (37% and 28%, respectively, P = 0.047). No significant difference was found in the 3-year overall survival rate among the three groups (72%, 59% and 82% for groups I, II and III, respectively). Three-year distant metastases rates were 17%, 0% and 18%, respectively. Skull-base invasion (P = 0.017) and pathology (P = 0.0006) correlated with overall survival. Treatment was well tolerated and no significant difference was observed among the three groups in acute and late toxicities (grade III toxicity is minimal: 17%, 17%, 0% of oral mucositis and 25%, 17%, 17% of nasopharyngeal mucositis in groups I, II, III, respectively, and 8% leukocytopenia only in group II; no grade IV toxicity occurred in any of the groups except for a fatal bleeding in group III).ConclusionsRe-irradiation with high-dose 3D-CRT boost technique results in high local control rate and acceptable toxicity in patients with recurrent NPC. Dose escalation to the boost volume to 78 Gy (54 Gy + 24 Gy boost) results in improved recurrence-free survival compared with lower doses.     

Dose escalation in prostate cancer using intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Initial promising results of 3D conformal neutron radiotherapy (3D-CNRT) were subsequently limited by high normal tissue toxicities. It is now possible to deliver intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy (IMNRT). The present work compares photon IMRT, 3D-CNRT and IMNRT for three prostate patients to quantify the benefits of IMNRT.

Materials and methods

We compare updated 3D-CNRT plans, IMNRT plans, and conventional IMRT plans by translating neutron DVHs into effective photon DVHs using the dose dependent radiobiological effectiveness (RBE) for each structure. RBE curves are parameterized for a range of normal tissue and prostate tumor values. Generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) and gEUD in 2 Gy fractions (gEUD₂) is calculated for each structure, plan, and parameterization. Rectal sparing and dose to prostate-GTV are compared for 3D-CNRT, IMNRT, and IMRT as a function of normal tissue and prostate RBE.

Results

The closer the RBE values of prostate tumor and normal tissue, the greater the advantage of IMNRT over 3D-CNRT. The rectal sparing achieved using IMNRT ranged from ∼5% to 13% depending upon the choice of RBE for rectum and the α/β value of prostate tumor. IMNRT may provide a theoretical dose advantage over photon IMRT if the α/β value of prostate is 1.5 and the RBEs of prostate and rectum differ by more than 5%. For higher values of prostate α/β any advantages of IMNRT over IMRT could require that the RBEs of prostate and rectum differ by as much as 20%.

Conclusions

IMNRT provides a clear normal tissue sparing advantage over 3D-CNRT. The advantage increases when the RBEs of the target structure and the normal tissue are similar. This RBE translation method could help identify clinical sites where the dose sparing advantages of IMNRT would allow for the exploitation of the radiobiological advantages of high-LET neutron radiotherapy.     

A dosimetric analysis of dose escalation using two intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

PURPOSE: To perform an analysis of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), sequential boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRTs), and integrated boost IMRT (IMRTi) for dose escalation in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography images from 15 patients were used. Treatment plans were generated using 3D-CRT, IMRTs, and IMRTi for dose levels of 54, 59.4, and 64.8 Gy. Plans were analyzed for target coverage, doses to liver, kidneys, small bowel, and spinal cord. RESULTS: Three-dimensional-CRT exceeded tolerance to small bowel in 1 of 15 (6.67%) patients at 54 Gy, and 4 of 15 (26.7%) patients at 59.4 and 64.8 Gy. 3D-CRT exceeded spinal cord tolerance in 1 of 15 patients (6.67%) at 59.4 Gy and liver constraints in 1 of 15 patients (6.67%) at 64.8 Gy; no IMRT plans exceeded tissue tolerance. Both IMRT techniques reduced the percentage of total kidney volume receiving 20 Gy (V20), the percentage of small bowel receiving 45 Gy (V45), and the percentage of liver receiving 35 Gy (V35). IMRTi appeared superior to IMRTs in reducing the total kidney V20 (p < 0.0001), right kidney V20 (p < 0.0001), and small bowel V45 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential boost IMRT and IMRTi improved the ability to achieve normal tissue dose goals compared with 3D-CRT. IMRTi allowed dose escalation to 64.8 Gy with acceptable normal tissue doses and superior dosimetry compared with 3D-CRT and IMRTs.     

Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer

Purpose: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is a technique designed to deliver prescribed radiation doses to localized tumors with high precision, while effectively excluding the surrounding normal tissues. It facilitates tumor dose escalation which should overcome the relative resistance of tumor clonogens to conventional radiation dose levels. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: A total of 743 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT. As part of a phase I study, the tumor target dose was increased from 64.8 to 81 Gy in increments of 5.4 Gy. Tumor response was evaluated by post-treatment decrease of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to levels of ≤1.0 ng/ml and by sextant prostate biopsies performed ≥2.5 years after completion of 3D-CRT. PSA relapse-free survival was used to evaluate long-term outcome. The median follow-up was 3 years (range: 1–7.6 years).Results: Induction of an initial clinical response was dose-dependent, with 90% of patients receiving 75.6 or 81.0 Gy achieving a PSA nadir ≤1.0 ng compared with 76% and 56% for those treated with 70.2 Gy and 64.8 Gy, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival for patients with favorable prognostic indicators (stage T1-2, pretreatment PSA ≤10.0 ng/ml and Gleason score ≤6) was 85%, compared to 65% for those with intermediate prognosis (one of the prognostic indicators with a higher value) and 35% for the group with unfavorable prognosis (two or more indicators with higher values) (p < 0.001). PSA relapse-free survival was significantly improved in patients with intermediate and unfavorable prognosis receiving ≥75.6 Gy (p < 0.05). A positive biopsy at ≥2.5 years after 3D-CRT was observed in only 1/15 (7%) of patients receiving 81.0 Gy, compared with 12/25 (48%) after 75.6 Gy, 19/42 (45%) after 70.2 Gy, and 13/23 (57%) after 64.8 Gy (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The data provide evidence for a significant effect of dose escalation on the response of human prostate cancer to irradiation and defines new standards for curative radiotherapy in this disease.     

External beam radiotherapy and hyperthermia in the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate the combination of external beam radiation therapy and hyperthermia in the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated on a Phase I/II protocol between June 1990 and April 1993. The median age of the patients was 69 years. Nine patients had well differentiated adenocarcinoma, ten patients had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and six patients had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. All patients had American Urologic Society Stage C2-D1 adenocarcinoma. The median pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was 29 ng/mL (range, 6-104 ng/mL). All patients received external beam radiation therapy using a four-field technique. The median radiation dose was 6,800 centigrays (cGy) given in 200-cGy fractions. Hyperthermia was administered concurrently with radiation therapy to temperatures of 42.5 degrees C for 30 minutes using a transrectal ultrasound applicator with 3 thermometry probes, given as either a single treatment (9 patients) or as two treatments (17 patients). Overall survival (OS) and biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) status were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A consensus conference definition of PSA failure was used. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. The median follow-up for all patients was 71 months. RESULTS: The median time to PSA nadir was 15 months with a median PSA nadir value of 1.0 ng/mL. The median and 5-year OS was 88 months and 73%, respectively, and the median and 5-year bNED survival was 36 months and 35%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed only the pretreatment PSA level (P = 0.03) and the PSA nadir reached (P < 0.01) to be significant predictors of bNED survival. The duration of hyperthermia therapy showed a trend toward significance for OS (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The current Phase I/II protocol evaluating the combination of prostate hyperthermia and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma suggests prostate hyperthermia to be feasible with no apparent significant increased toxicity, although there was no significant improvement in treatment outcome when compared with other studies reported in the literature evaluating external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen suppression. However, further investigation into the duration as well as the temperature of the hyperthermia with a greater number of patients is warranted.     

Dose escalation study of intravenous estramustine phosphate in combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine a safe weekly dose of i.v. estramustine phosphate (EMP) to combine with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced prostate cancer (castrate and noncastrate) were administered escalating doses of weekly 1-h infusion of i.v. EMP (500-1000-1500 mg/m(2)) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) over 1 h) and i.v. carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml-min every 4 weeks). Four weeks of therapy were considered one cycle. In the first three cohorts, EMP was given i.v. 3 h before paclitaxel. Cohorts 4 and 5 reversed the administration order: EMP (doses 1000-1500 mg/m(2)) was given immediately after the end of paclitaxel infusion. Plasma levels of EMP and its metabolites, estramustine and estromustine, were monitored at time 0, at 120 min, and approximately at 20, 21, and 168 h from the start of EMP infusion. Paclitaxel concentrations were determined at basal (0), 30, 60, 90, and 120 min and 18 h after the start of paclitaxel infusion, and a concentration-time curve was estimated. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed in cycles 1 and 2 during the first week of therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered on the initial three dose levels (cohorts 1-3). Dose-limiting transient hepatic toxicity was encountered in cohort 3 (EMP = 1500 mg/m(2)). An additional 13 patients were treated with paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) first, followed by i.v. EMP at 1000 mg/m(2) (cohort 4), and 1500 mg/m(2) (cohort 5). No dose-limiting toxicities were seen, and cohort 5 was determined safe for Phase II studies. Thromboembolic events were observed in 9% of patients (no prophylactic coumadin was used). Plasma concentrations of EMP and metabolites increased proportionally with dose. In all cohorts, there was a slight decrease in EMP and estramustine plasma concentrations between cycles 1 and 2. Although not significant, higher levels of estromustine at cycle 2 were observed in comparison to cycle 1. Decreased clearance of paclitaxel leading to higher than expected paclitaxel plasma concentrations was observed during the first cycle of therapy. Paclitaxel plasma concentrations were lower during cycle 2. In 17 patients with androgen-independent disease, 59% had >/=50% posttherapy decline in PSA and 22% showed measurable disease regression. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of weekly i.v. EMP in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin can be safely administered with hepatic toxicity being transient and reversible. Pharmacokinetic results suggest that EMP competitively inhibits the biotransformation of paclitaxel after the first administration. This effect is counterbalanced, after repeated administrations, by a possible induction of the metabolic system caused by EMP. Phase II testing is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.     

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.     

The challenge of locally advanced prostate cancer

Locally advanced prostate cancer can be reliably identified and has a disease-specific death rate of approximately 75%. Monotherapy treatment options have limited efficacy for locally advanced disease. Multimodality therapy may improve survival. This article reviews the current results of multimodality therapy, including hormonal therapy plus radiation therapy, hormonal therapy plus radical prostatectomy, and brachytherapy plus external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and presents current ideas for novel multimodality approaches.     

Dose escalation with 3D-CRT in prostate cancer: French study of dose escalation with conformal 3D radiotherapy in prostate cancer-preliminary results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of dose escalation in a multi-institutional study in prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 1995 and October 1998, 164 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at one of five French institutions. The dose of radiation was escalated from 66 to 80 Gy (ICRU point). The maximum dose to the rectal wall was limited to 75 Gy. RESULTS: Results were compared in two groups, one (group 1) receiving the standard dose (n = 46 patients; 66 to 70 Gy) and the other (group 2) receiving the escalated dose (n = 118 patients; 74 to 80 Gy). There was no difference in the characteristics of patients between the two groups. The mean follow-up time was 32 months in group 1 and 17.5 months in group 2. No statistical difference between the two groups was observed in the incidence of late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities. The probability of achieving a posttreatment prostate-specific antigen nadir of 相似文献   

局部进展期前列腺癌的治疗进展

The standard treatment mode of locally advanced prostate cancer is still controversial. With the progress of medical technology, treatments of prostate cancer achieve different progresses in surgical treatment, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy. The three treatment modes have diverse tumor growth control rate and survival period, which have different complications and different influences on the quality of life.     

Dose escalation of oral vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of the current study was to identify the tolerable dose level of oral vinorelbine when given in combination with estramustine to men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The secondary objectives were to describe the toxicities of the combined regimen in patients with HRPC and to estimate the efficacy of oral vinorelbine in combination with estramustine based on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with HRPC were treated on a 28-day cycle with estramustine at a dose of 140 mg orally 3 times a day on Days 1-3 and 8-10. Vinorelbine was given orally on Days 2 and 9. The initial dose of vinorelbine was 50 mg/m2 and was escalated to 70 mg/m2 using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. RESULTS: Three of 17 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at the 70 mg/m2 dose level of oral vinorelbine. One patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity at a dose of 60 mg/m2 and no dose-limitig toxicities were reported at the 50 mg/m2 dose. The overall response rate by > or = 50% reduction in PSA was 17.2%, (95% confidence interval, 5.9-35.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral vinorelbine at doses of 70 mg/m2 may be safely combined with estramustine. The combination appears to have modest activity in men with advanced prostate cancer. The trial design employed the time-to-event continual reassessment method, which potentially allows for rapid accrual, a more complete assessment of toxicities, and a larger fraction of patients to be treated at an effective dose. More active regimens are needed to further evaluate the utility of this clinical trial design in patients with prostate cancer.     

Hormonal therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer

A patient with locally advanced prostate cancer (stages C and D1) has a poor prognosis with a high risk of developing and dying of distant metastases. Hormonal therapy is the major form of systemic therapy for metastatic (stage D2) prostate cancer. The most commonly used forms of hormonal therapy are orchiectomy, diethylstilbestrol, and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone, agonists that prevent the stimulation of tumor cells by testosterone. They produce a 60%-80% symptomatic or objective response rate, but their ability to prolong overall survival remains uncertain. Surgical adrenalectomy, hypophysectomy, and pharmacologic adrenal suppression prevent the clinically less significant adrenal androgen stimulation of tumor cells. Antiandrogens competitively inhibit the interaction between androgens and cytosolic androgen receptors. Complete androgen blockade (luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist and antiandrogen) was initially espoused to be superior to single-agent hormonal therapy, but preliminary results from a multigroup randomized trial suggest that it has only a minimal advantage. The benefit of hormonal therapy in stages C and D1 prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis has not been clearly established. Available studies are few, and most often they are uncontrolled or include only small numbers of patients. However, they suggest that the early use of hormonal therapy prolongs disease-free survival but does not prevent ultimate disease progression or prolong overall survival. Hormone receptor assays may be helpful in the selection of patients who would benefit from early hormonal therapy.