Does laparoscopy worsen the prognosis for incidental gallbladder cancer?

Background More than 75% of cholecystectomies are done laparoscopically and less than one-third of gallbladder carcinomas are known presurgically. It is supposed that the laparoscopic technique could adversely affect the prognosis of gallbladder cancer. Methods The C-A-E has started a register of all cases of cholecystectomy with a postoperative incidental finding of gallbladder carcinoma. The aim is to compare the prospectively collected follow-up data on the outcome of these patients and to answer the question of whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy affects the prognosis of incidental gallbladder cancer. Results A total of 377 cases have been recorded so far. These include 201 patients treated by the laparoscopic procedure, 119 by an open procedure, and 57 by an intraoperative conversion. The survival shows a significantly better life expectancy for the patients treated laparoscopically. Conclusion The life expectancy is higher for the laparoscopically treated patients and this cannot be explained by the fact that the laparoscopic technique is used to treat the earlier stages of cancer. The access technique does not seem to influence the prognosis for gallbladder carcinomas.     

Port site metastases from gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a Swedish survey and review of published reports.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of port site metastases from unsuspected gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective national multicentre study, 1991-94. SETTING: All 8 university and 24 central hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: All 32 hospitals were interviewed by means of a written questionnaire. The registers of all Swedish Oncological Centres and the registers of the National Board of Health and Welfare were checked for reported cases of gallbladder cancer and surgical classification codes for cholecystectomy. To detect laparoscopic interventions incorrectly registered as open operations, all cholecystectomies registered as open were matched against the Swedish Registry of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the years 1991-93 and all patients records for 1994 were scrutinised. RESULTS: Replies were obtained from 30/32 clinics (94%) and 11976 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were done. Of 447 patients with verified gallbladder carcinoma 270 had their gallbladders removed, 55 (20%) laparoscopically. 9 of these (16%) developed port site metastases and 6 died from their disease at a median of 18 months (range 5-22). Two patients are alive, 54 and 45 months after cholecystectomy. One patient has been lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Port site metastases from gallbladder cancer may be more common than previously thought. A laparoscopic procedure should not be done if cancer of the gallbladder is suspected.     

Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection

OBJECTIVES: We assess how laparoscopy has altered the presentation of patients with gallbladder cancer and determine whether radical resection in patients with gallbladder cancer is beneficial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to an increased frequency of incidentally discovered gallbladder carcinoma. Little data exist to guide surgeons in the optimum management of patients with gallbladder cancer, particularly with respect to the potential advantages of radical resection. METHODS: Records of 107 patients with gallbladder cancer admitted to a tertiary academic medical center between 1995 and 2004 were reviewed. Gallbladder cancer was found incidentally in 53 patients (50%). Fifty-two of these patients underwent a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were found to have gallbladder cancer intraoperatively or following the operation by subsequent pathologic evaluation of the specimen. Gallbladder cancer had been diagnosed preoperatively by radiology in the other 54 patients (50%). These patients did not undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were explored electively. RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 67 years and 66% were female. Patients who were found to have gallbladder carcinoma incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a significant increase in survival when compared with those who were admitted electively with a known diagnosis (P < 0.001). All patients who presented with a known diagnosis had stage II or greater disease, and 36% of these were stage IV carcinomas. However, 82% of those patients who were found incidentally were stage I or II. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 15%; those discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a 5-year survival of 33%. This difference was significant among patients with stage II carcinomas. In the laparoscopic group, there was no difference in survival between the patients who were immediately converted to an open resection when identified to have gallbladder cancer intraoperatively (n = 6) and those who had a completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were re-explored at a later point when found to have gallbladder cancer by subsequent pathology (n = 33). There was a significant improvement in survival in 50 patients (47%) who underwent some form of radical resection (P < 0.001). Stage for stage comparison showed that this was significant in stage II disease. Patients who underwent hepatic resection along with lymphadenectomy and extra hepatic biliary resection had similar survival compared with those who had hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to have resulted in the earlier discovery of gallbladder cancer in some patients, resulting in increased probability of survival. Patients discovered with gallbladder carcinoma during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy do not have to be converted immediately to an open resection and should be referred to a tertiary care center for further exploration. Adjunctive radical surgical resection, either at the time of cholecystectomy or subsequently, increases survival significantly in early stage disease.     

Videolaparoscopy and carcinoma of the gallbladder

There have been several reports claiming that there is a risk that laparoscopic cholecystectomy might worsen the prognosis of unexpected gallbladder cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate which factors influence the prognosis of such cancers. A clinicopathological study was conducted in 25 patients with unexpected gallbladder cancer. The results of 10 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared with those of 15 patients undergoing open cholecystectomy. Correlations were evaluated between cumulative survival rates and seven prognostic factors, namely, age, sex, histopathological grade, pathological stage, occurrence of bile spillage, type of cholecystectomy (laparoscopic or open) and additional surgical treatments. Seven patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (70%) and 9 patients after open cholecystectomy (64%) had cancer recurrence: the difference was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant correlation between survival rate and tumour stage (P < 0.01) and occurrence of bile spillage (P < 0.05). There was no difference in survival depending on whether cholecystectomy was carried out using laparoscopic or traditional techniques. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not adversely affect the prognosis of unexpected gallbladder cancer. Once the histological findings have been examined, the surgeon will decide whether it is necessary to extend surgery, regardless of whether laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy is carried out.     

Wound recurrence from gallbladder cancer after open cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Reports of port site recurrences from gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy have raised considerable concern as to whether the laparoscopic technique implies an increased risk of metastatic disease. In a previous study of gallbladder cancer and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we reported a frequency of 16% port site metastases. The purpose of the present study was to determine the frequency of wound metastases from gallbladder cancer after open cholecystectomy. METHODS: The registers from the Swedish Oncological Centers and the National Board of Health and Welfare were checked for reported cases of gallbladder cancer and surgical classification codes for open cholecystectomy from 1991 to 1994. The study included all 8 university and 24 county hospitals in Sweden. The files from all patients with gallbladder cancer who had an open cholecystectomy were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 270 patients who had a cholecystectomy, of which 215 were classified as open and 55 as laparoscopic. Of the 215 patients, 11 patients were excluded because of an incorrect or deficient histopathologic or surgical classification. In 186 patients (91%), sufficient data were obtained for follow-up. Twelve patients (6.5%) had wound metastases from their gallbladder cancer. All patients with wound metastases died with a median survival of 10 months (range, 3 to 65 months). CONCLUSIONS: Wound metastases from gallbladder cancer after open cholecystectomy may be more common than previously assumed.     

Gallbladder carcinoma during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it associated with bad prognosis?

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for gallstone disease. The ultrasonogram has failed for the early detection of gallbladder cancer, especially if inflammation (chronic or acute) is present. Incidental gallbladder could be an important cancer finding during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, due to the potential cancer cell dissemination during the procedure. In our Department, 6500 laparoscopic cholecystectomies have been performed in the last 5 years and in 15 cases (0.23%) gallbladder cancer was found during surgery or after histological examination of the resected gallbladder. In none of these 15 patients was pre-operative diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma postulated. When re-evaluation of the pre-operative ultrasonograms was done, it was possible to observe signs suggesting the presence of neoplastic infiltration in 4 of them (28.6%). During videoscopic exploration, also in 4 patients, the suspicion of gallbladder cancer was noted. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed in 9 patients. In 2 of them, in situ or mucosal invasion was demonstrated with a long survival. One patient presented recurrence at the biliary hilum 2,5 years after surgery. Six patients were re-operated and in 4 of them peritoneal or port site metastasis was found; all died early (4.5 month median survival). The other 2 patients were submitted to liver bed resection and lymph node dissection. These patients are free of cancer recurrence after 15 months of follow-up. Six patients were converted to open surgery, performing palliative procedures and died before the 12 month follow-up. The suspicion of pre-operative gallbladder cancer is generally unlikely to be confirmed based on ultrasonographic signs; but, in some cases with high suspicion, further investigation (TAC, tumor markers, etc.) must be indicated in order to avoid poor results. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be associated with bad prognosis, and then, when gallbladder cancer is suspected during the laparoscopic procedure, conversion to open surgery could be the best choice.     

Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of trials randomizing patients with colon cancer to laparoscopically assisted or open colectomy to enhance the power in determining whether laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is oncologically safe. DATA SOURCES: The databases of the Barcelona, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST), Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR), and Conventional vs Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer (CLASICC) trials were the data sources for the study. STUDY SELECTION: Patients who had at least 3 years of complete follow-up data were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Patients who had undergone curative surgery before March 1, 2000, were studied. Three-year disease-free survival and overall survival were the primary outcomes of this analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 1765 patients, 229 were excluded, leaving 796 patients in the laparoscopically assisted arm and 740 patients in the open arm for analysis. Three-year disease-free survival rates in the laparoscopically assisted and open arms were 75.8% and 75.3%, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] of the difference, -5% to 4%). The associated common hazard ratio (laparoscopically assisted vs open surgery with adjustment for sex, age, and stage) was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.80-1.22; P = .92). The 3-year overall survival rate after laparoscopic surgery was 82.2% and after open surgery was 83.5% (95% CI of the difference, -3% to 5%). The associated hazard ratio was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.83-1.37; P = .61). Disease-free and overall survival rates for stages I, II, and III evaluated separately did not differ between the 2 treatments. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopically assisted colectomy for cancer is oncologically safe.     

Significance of preoperative ultrasound measurement of gallbladder wall thickness

Evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of biliary tract disease usually includes ultrasound assessment of the gallbladder. Does measurement of the thickness of the gallbladder wall yield any significant information to the clinical surgeon? The records of all my patients undergoing cholecystectomy since 1990 were reviewed. The entire series consists of 401 consecutive patients, in whom 388 procedures were completed laparoscopically, with 14 patients requiring conversion to an open cholecystectomy. Each patient's preoperative evaluation included a gallbladder ultrasound, which included measurement of the diameter of the gallbladder wall. The entire series of cholecystectomies was evaluated according to the ultrasound measured diameter of the gallbladder wall. A thin gallbladder wall was less than 3 mm in diameter. A thick gallbladder wall was 3 mm or greater in diameter. Of the 401 consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder disease, 86 (21.5%) were removed laparoscopically for acalculous disease. Eleven per cent of patients with acalculous cholecystitis had acute cholecystitis and 89 per cent had chronic cholecystitis. Every patient with either a thin or thick gallbladder wall with acalculous cholecystitis had a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Three-hundred fifteen patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for calculous cholecystitis. In patients with calculous cholecystitis, 28.3 per cent had acute cholecystitis and 71.7 per cent had chronic cholecystitis. The gallbladder wall was found to be greater than 3 mm in 38 per cent of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and greater than 3 mm in 41 per cent of patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis. One-hundred, forty-two patients, out of a series total of 401, had a gallbladder wall thickness greater than 3 mm by preoperative sonography and 14 of these patients (10%) required conversion to an open cholecystectomy. A preoperative gallbladder ultrasound evaluation for symptomatic cholecystitis, which documents a thick gallbladder wall (> or =3 mm) with calculi, is a clinical warning for the laparoscopic surgeon of the potential for a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure which may require conversion to an open cholecystectomy procedure.     

Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma--the CAE-S/CAMIC registry

INTRODUCTION: Results of earlier surveys raised the prospect that laparoscopic surgical procedures may specifically increase the risk of port wound metastasis and generally of tumour cell seeding if at the time of operation an unsuspected gallbladder cancer existed. Other observations lead to presume that laparoscopic technique could deteriorate the prognosis of gallbladder cancer. These assumptions are going to be verified by the CAES/ CAMIC-registry. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The Workgroup Surgical Endoscopy (CAE) of the German Society of Surgery has started 1997 a registry of all cases of cholecystectomy--laparoscopic as well open--with a postoperative incidental finding of a gallbladder carcinoma. The aim of our registry is to compare the prospectively collected follow up data on the outcome of these patients and to answer the question whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy affects the course and the prognosis of patients with unsuspected gallbladder cancer. RESULTS: Until now 142 cases of incidental gallbladder cancer following laparoscopic and 79 cases following open cholecystectomy as well as 24 cases after intraoperative conversion to the open procedure have been recorded. The median follow up runs up to 27 (1-69) months. Following laparoscopic primary procedure we registered 10 port site metastases (7 %), following open primary procedure 4 (5.1 %) wound recurrences. The total recurrence rate at the moment is about 27 % after laparoscopic treatment and 31 % for conventionally operated patients. 70 of the 245 patients underwent a second radical procedure after diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma. A postoperative combined radio- and chemotherapy was undertaken in 4 cases, a chemotherapy alone in 14 cases. 64 patients already died due to the underlining disease. DISCUSSION: At the present, after a median follow up of 27 months, the incidence of abdominal wall recurrences is very similar following laparoscopic and conventional procedure (7 % vs. 5.1 %). The total incidence of recurrences is at the moment slightly higher following open cholecystectomy (31 % vs. 27 %). The access technique, open or laparoscopic, doesn't seem to influence the prognosis of unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma. Until now we could not find disadvantages for the laparoscopically operated group.     

Should suspected early gallbladder cancer be treated laparoscopically?

Early gallbladder cancer (EGC), defined as T1 and T2 disease, is frequently curable when completely excised without bile spillage. The objective of the present study was to determine what effect initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy has on outcome in patients with EGC. Of 89 patients referred to our institution with gallbladder cancer over an 11-year period, 26 had undergone initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixteen of the 26 patients had T1 or T2 disease and are the subjects of this report. These patients were reviewed retrospectively to assess preoperative diagnosis, intraoperative bile spillage, and outcome (recurrence and survival). In addition, the Western literature was reviewed to determine the impact of initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy on recurrence and survival of patients with EGC. Six patients had a preoperative ultrasound consistent with a mass in the gallbladder wall. Seven (44%) had documented bile spillage during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. T stage based on the laparoscopic cholecystectomy was T1 (n = 1) and T2 (n = 15). Twelve patients underwent reexploration of whom seven underwent further radical excision (gallbladder liver bed resection and extensive lymphadenectomy). After a mean follow-up of 20.1 months (range 4 to 39 months), 69% of patients have had a recurrence or died. Three patients had a port-site recurrence. Five (71%) of seven patients with bile spillage at laparoscopic cholecystectomy have had a recurrence or died of disease. A review of the Western literature on EGC initially removed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (including the present series) yielded 21 patients with T1 and 42 patients withT2 disease. One-year Kaplan-Meier survival (T1 = 89%, T2 = 71%) and 3-year Kaplan-Meier survival (T1 = 47%, T2 = 40%) of these patients is worse than prior reports for open cholecystectomy. An initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy with its potential for bile spillage can convert potentially curable EGC to incurable disease. Patients with preoperative findings suspicious for gallbladder cancer should undergo open exploration with intent to perform a radical cancer operation as a primary procedure if the diagnosis is confirmed intraoperatively. Presented at Forty-Second Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, May 20–23, 2001, Atlanta, Ga (oral presentation).     

Is concomitant cholecystectomy necessary in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery?

Background  Morbid obesity is associated with a high prevalence of cholecystopathy, and there is an increased risk of cholelithiasis during rapid weight loss following gastric bypass. In the era of open gastric bypass prophylactic cholecystectomy was advocated. However, routine cholecystectomy at laparoscopic gastric bypass is controversial. Methods  We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) from February 2000 to August 2006. All had routine preoperative biliary ultrasonography. Concomitant cholecystectomy at LRYGB was planned in patients with proven cholelithiasis and/or gallbladder polyp ≥1 cm diameter. Results  1711 LRYGBs were performed. Forty-two patients (2.5%) had a previous cholecystectomy and were excluded from further analysis. Two hundred and five patients (12%) had gallbladder pathology: cholelithiasis in 190 (93%), sludge in 14 (6.8%), and a 2 cm polyp in 1 (0.5%). One hundred and twenty-three patients with cholelithiasis (65%) had a concomitant cholecystectomy at LRYGB, while 68 (35.7%) did not. Of these, 123 (99%) were completed laparoscopically. Concomitant cholecystectomy added a mean operative time of 18 min (range 15–23 min). One patient developed an accessory biliary radicle leak requiring diagnostic laparoscopic transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LTG-ERCP). Of the 68 patients with cholelithiasis who did not undergo cholecystectomy 12 (17.6%) required subsequent cholecystectomy. A further 4 patients with preoperative gallbladder sludge required cholecystectomy. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. One patient required laparoscopic choledochotomy and common bile duct exploration (CBDE) with stone retrieval. Eighty-eight patients (6%) with absence of preoperative gallbladder pathology developed symptomatic cholelithiasis after LRYGB; 69 (78.4%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy; 3 presented with gallstone pancreatitis and 2 with obstructive jaundice, requiring laparoscopic transcystic CBDE in 4 and LTG-ERCP in one. Conclusion  In our experience, concomitant cholecystectomy at LRYGB for ultrasonography-confirmed gallbladder pathology is feasible and safe. It reduces the potential for future gallbladder-related morbidity, and the need for further surgery. Competing Interests Declared: None     

Long-term prognosis of gallbladder cancer diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Several clinical and laboratory studies concerning port-site recurrence have raised the concern that laparoscopic procedures might worsen the prognosis of malignant disease. However, the long-term prognosis of patients with malignancy who undergo laparoscopic surgery is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term prognosis of patients with unexpected gallbladder cancer diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: A clinicopathologic study was performed on 41 patients with postoperatively diagnosed gallbladder cancer from among 5,027 patients undergoing LC at 24 institutions. The cumulative survival rate was compared with that reported for gallbladder cancer diagnosed after open cholecystectomy (OC). RESULTS: Of 26 patients with early gallbladder cancer (pTis or pT1), 23 were simply followed up, and 9 of 15 patients with advanced cancer (pT2 or pT3) had additional resection after the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. Port-site recurrence occurred in four patients, and two of them died of the cancer. However, at this writing, the other two are still alive after abdominal wall resection or radiation therapy, having survived for 31 and 71 months, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 92% for early cancer and 59% for advanced cancer. These results were comparable with 5-year survival rates for gallbladder cancer diagnosed after OC. CONCLUSIONS: Although port-site recurrence occurred in four patients with advanced gallbladder cancer, the long-term prognosis of patients with undiagnosed gallbladder cancer who underwent LC was not worsened by the laparoscopic procedure. We conclude that surgeons can perform LC with reasonable confidence, even if the lesion is possibly malignant.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients

BACKGROUND: The results and advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the geriatric population have received minimal attention. Several early reports related high conversion rates complications and mortality. This case series review is focused on the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the geriatric population in a private practice environment. METHODS: The records of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy by the author over the past 12 years were reviewed. The entire series consists of 248 patients in whom 239 procedures were completed laparoscopically, with 9 patients converted to an open cholecystectomy. This report identifies 82 patients who were aged 65 years or older at the time of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The results of this series are reported in three progressive geriatric age groups: 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 to 95 years. RESULTS: All 82 geriatric patients reported from this series were symptomatic from their gallbladder disease. A majority of all patients in all age groups were female. Gallstones were present in 77 patients, and 5 patients had a gallbladder ejection fraction of less than 35%. In this series of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 26.8% had an emergent procedure for acute cholecystitis and the remainder had an elective or semielective procedure for symptomatic cholecystitis. The majority of patients between the ages of 65 and 84 years had elective procedures whereas the majority of patients over age 85 had an emergent procedure. There were 2 deaths. The first death (age 86 years) was from extensive metastatic cancer from the gallbladder, and the second patient (age 91 years) died of sepsis and multiple system organ failure. Each patient in this entire series had an attempt at laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder. The conversion rate was 3.6% in the entire series of 248 patients and also 3.6% in the geriatric series. Ninety-one percent of the patients in this geriatric series were discharged home after only 24 to 48 hours of postoperative observation. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure in the geriatric population. The procedure should be recommended for all geriatric patients who have symptomatic cholecystitis before the development of acute cholecystitis or severe fibrosis with dense adhesions from chronic cholecystitis.     

Laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Inadvertent dissemination of latent gallbladder (GB) cancer has become a crucial issue with the widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a standard operation for benign gallbladder diseases. METHODS: Laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy is a new technique we have developed for the resection of GB tumors with suspicion of malignancy. The procedure is safe and minimally invasive and prevents tumor dissemination. The GB is resected laparoscopically along with a 1-cm margin of the liver using LaparoSonic Coagulating Shears without any ligation or clipping. RESULTS: We applied this technique to a patient with a GB tumor in the fundus. The tumor was not exposed on the cut surface, and there were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy for GB tumors with suspicion of malignancy is a minimally invasive technique that may decrease the risk of tumor dissemination.     

Radical Second Resection Provides Survival Benefit for Patients with T2 Gallbladder Carcinoma First Discovered after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Port site recurrence or peritoneal seeding is a fatal complication following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma. The aims of this retrospective analysis were to determine the association of gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with port site/peritoneal recurrence and to determine the role of radical second resection in the management of gallbladder carcinoma first diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 28 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma were analyzed, of whom 10 had a radical second resection. Five patients had recurrences; port site/peritoneum recurrence in 3 and distant metastasis in 2. The incidence of port site/peritoneal recurrence was higher in patients with gallbladder perforation (3/7, 43%) than in those without (0/21, 0%) (p = 0.011). The outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was worse in 7 patients with gallbladder perforation (cumulative 5-year survival of 43%) than in those without (cumulative 5-year survival of 100%) (p <0.001). Among 13 patients with a pT2 tumor, the outcome after radical second resection (cumulative 5-year survival of 100%) was better than that after laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone (cumulative 5-year survival of 50%) (p = 0.039), although there was no survival benefit of radical second resection in the 15 patients with a pT1 tumor (p = 0.65). In conclusion, gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with port site/peritoneal recurrence and worse patient survival. Radical second resection may be beneficial for patients with pT2 gallbladder carcinoma first discovered after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Port site recurrences after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Port site metastasis is a well-documented event after laparoscopic procedures in cancer patients. We summarize current epidemiological knowledge about the risk of this complication after laparoscopic/conventional cholecystectomy in patients with unexpected gallbladder cancer as well as other intraabdominal malignancies. We found 174 cases of port site metastasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 12 recurrences in the surgical scar after converted or open cholecystectomy. A review of all case reports and its comparison with four international surveys show a 14% incidence of port site metastases 7 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cancer. Similar numbers are available for open cholecystectomy. Our data suggest that abdominal wall metastases of gallbladder cancer are not a specific complication of laparoscopy. The long-term prognosis of patients with unknown gallbladder cancer however seems to be worsened by laparoscopy. The registry of the German Society of Surgery, which prospectively compares follow-up and prognosis of all cases of cholecystectomy, laparoscopic as well as open, in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer will definitively clarify whether laparoscopy affects the prognosis of patients with unsuspected gallbladder cancer. Received: February 13, 2001 / Accepted: August 1, 2001     

A 10-year experience of unsuspected gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Unsuspected gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a cancer that was previously manipulated by laparoscopic technique. The reported incidence was 0.3-1% and became an emerging problem as the popularity of LC increased. Lack of reliable data could address the outcome of reresection or nonreresection patients and the standard management. This study reviewed a single center experience in managing unsuspected gallbladder cancer patients after LC between July 1, 1992 and July 1, 2000 who had at least 2 years of follow-up. There were 11 patients (0.6%) postoperatively diagnosed with gallbladder cancer after 1825 LCs. Group A included three patients (28%) with nontransmural invasion, group B included four patients (36%) who had transmural invasion without secondary surgical intervention, and group C included four patients (36%) with reresection. The perioperation parameters and strategies were collected and compared. A review of the literature was performed simultaneously, and we concluded that unsuspected gallbladder cancer with nontransmural invasion needs no further treatment; however, aggressive reresection is beneficial to transmural invasion cancer, and prevention of bile spillage during LC should be the goal of every surgeon.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early gallbladder carcinoma: long-term outcome in comparison with conventional open cholecystectomy

Background The role of laparoscopic surgery for malignant gallbladder tumors remains uncertain. This study compared the surgical results of laparoscopic versus conventional open cholecystectomy for patients with early-stage gallbladder carcinoma and examined the role of laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinomas. Methods Data for the treatment of gallbladder carcinomas were gathered from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Linkou, Taiwan). A retrospective analysis of 40 patients with either stage 0 or stage 1 gallbladder carcinoma was performed. The patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of cholecystectomy procedures. The long-term outcomes for the two groups were compared. Results During the follow-up period, which ranged from 6.5 to 197.6 months, four patients in the conventional open cholecystectomy group encountered tumor recurrence, and one patient in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group experienced distant tumor recurrence (p = 0.216). No local port-site tumor recurrence was identified in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The overall 5-year survival rate in this series was 87.1%. A comparison of survival rates between the two groups demonstrated no significant difference (p = 0.340). Conclusion The laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure did not adversely influence the prognosis of patients with early-stage gallbladder carcinomas. Furthermore, meticulous removal of gallbladders during laparoscopic surgery, in which early gallbladder carcinoma can be managed successfully using laparoscopic cholecystectomy, achieved a satisfactory surgical result and a low port-site tumor recurrence rate.     

顺逆结合胆囊切除在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用

目的 :探讨顺逆结合胆囊切除在腹腔镜胆囊切除术 (LC)中的应用价值。方法 :对 6 0 0例结石性胆囊炎、胆囊息肉患者 ,采用顺逆结合法行LC手术。结果 :6 0 0例患者术后均顺利康复 ,无胆管损伤等并发症发生。术中将胆囊完全游离后发现 ,把 8例的胆总管误认为胆囊管夹闭 ,2例各有一与肝总管平行的副肝管汇入钛夹远端的胆囊管 ,11例在钛夹近端的胆囊管内有结石嵌顿 ,而术前B超未提示胆囊管内有结石嵌顿 ;均及时取除钛夹后 ,重新夹闭胆囊管的近端和远端 ,再切除胆囊。结论 :在LC手术中 ,采用顺逆结合法切除胆囊 ,可有效地减少胆管损伤、胆囊管残余结石等并发症的发生     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后肝功能变化的原因

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术后肝功能变化的原因。方法:将胆囊结石62例患者随机分为2组,A组32例,常规应用电刀切除胆囊,胆囊床普遍电凝处理;B组(对照组)30例,应用弯剪刀分离切除胆囊,钛夹钳闭止血。术后1、3、5、7d抽血测TBIL、ALT、AST、GGT、ALP含量。结果:A组术后第1天TBIL、ALT、AST明显升高,B组无升高,两组差异有显著性(P<0.01),A组术后第3天ALT、AST虽有下降,但仍高出正常值范围,差异仍有显著性(P<0.01),GGT、ALP两组均无明显升高。结论:电热损伤局部肝组织和肝外胆管的热电效应是术后肝功能变化的主要原因。