活体肝移植供者术前磁共振胰胆管成像检查中脂肪餐的应用

目的 评价脂肪餐后磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)在活体肝移植(LDLT)供者术前胆道系统评估中的应用价值.方法 具有术中胆道造影(IOC)资料的LDLT供者50例.术前供者脂肪餐(进食2个油煎鸡蛋)前后分别行MRCP,比较脂肪餐前后二级胆管的显示情况及直径差异;脂肪餐后MRCP显示胆道分型的结果与相应术中IOC结果相比较,计算脂肪餐后MRCP评估正常与变异胆管的准确度、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值.结果所有供者中,脂肪餐前MRCP显示的二级胆管82%能满足评估要求,脂肪餐后MRCP显示的二级胆管100%能满足评估要求,脂肪餐前后MRCP显示二级胆管的图像质量和直径的差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);以相应术中IOC为参考标准,脂肪餐后MRCP准确评估胆管解剖结构分型49例(98%),显示正常与变异解剖结构的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为98%、94.7%、100%、100%、96.9%.结论 脂肪餐后MRCP对二级胆管结构显示明显改善,完全能够满足临床LDLT供者术前胆道系统评估的需要,可以作为常规MRCP的有益补充.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the applications of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after fat meal in the preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy of living liver donors.Methods Fifty cases of the preoperative donors for living liver transplantation were included and all had the corresponding intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) information. The MRCP of the donors for living liver transplantation was performed before and after fat meal (two fried eggs). The visualization and diameter of the secondary bile duct were analyzed before and after the fat meal. The results of the biliary branching pattern by MRCP after fat meal were compared with the corresponding IOC results. The accuracy, sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRCP after the fat meal in distinguishing normal and any type of variant biliary anatomy were calculated. Results In all cases,82% of the 50 cases in MRCP before the fat meal could meet the diagnosis needs of the preoperative evaluation,and 100% of the 50 cases in MRCP after the fat meal could meet the diagnosis needs. There was significant difference in the demonstration quality and diameter of the secondary bile duct in MRCP before and after the fat meal (P＜0. 05). MRCP showed accurate anatomy of the biliary system, using IOC as the reference standard, in 49(98%) subjects. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRC in distinguishing normal and any type of variant biliary anatomy were 98%,94. 7%, 100%, 10% and 96. 9%,respectively. Conclusion The MRCP after fat meal can clearly demonstrate the secondary bile duct and perfectly meet the needs of the preoperative evaluation of the living liver transplantation. The MRCP after fat meal and routine MRCP should be considered complementary to one another in order to avoid complications in living liver transplantation donors.     

成人右半肝活体肝移植胆道重建探讨

目的探讨成人右半肝活体肝移植胆道重建的技术问题.方法回顾性分析我院2007年4月至2009年5月完成的21例成人右半肝活体肝移植资料.供肝右肝管与受者肝总管单个吻合10例;供肝两支胆管开口分别与受者两支胆管吻合5例;供肝胆管整形成一个开口与受者胆管吻合5例,其中采用T管支撑2例,Y型管支撑1例;右肝管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合1例.结果4例受者术后1个月内死亡,1例因术后急性肝坏死行再次肝移植.其余受者存活至今,1年存活率为77.65%.受者术后发生胆道并发症7例,其中胆漏5例,胆道狭窄2例,均经外科手术处理痊愈.胆管与胆管单个吻合口组、胆管整形成一个开口与受者胆管吻合组和两支胆管开口分别与受者胆管吻合组比较,胆道并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(x2=0.659,P=0.719).结论根据供受者胆管情况,可以灵活采用单根胆管吻合、胆管整形、分别吻合和肝管空肠吻合等不同重建方式.后壁连续、前壁间断以及显微外科技术的采用可能有助于降低胆道并发症的发生率.     

成人活体右半肝移植术前供肝体积评估100例资料分析

目的探讨成人活体右半肝移植中术前移植肝估测体积(GV)与术中实测质量(GW)的相关性。方法回顾性分析100例活体右半肝移植的临床资料,获得术前基于螺旋CT三维重建的GV和GW的数据,比较分析GV与GW、GV和受者标准肝体积(SLV)之比(GV/SLV)与GW和SLV之比(GW/SLV)之间的相关性。结果 GV(772.8±114.8)mL和GV/SLV0.624±0.082分别大于GW(654.7±86.7)g、GW/SLV0.529±0.060(均P=0.000);而且GV与GW、GV/SLV与GW/SLV均呈正相关(均P=0.000)。结论基于螺旋CT扫描并进行三维重建所估测的GV值大于术中实际获取GW值,两者存在正相关关系;活体肝移植中移植肝的体积评估方法仍需进一步完善。     

磁共振胰胆管成像、扩散加权成像及两者联合在胆道梗阻性疾病中的应用进展

胆道梗阻性疾病为临床常见病。MR胰胆管成像(MRCP)因其具有良好的定位、定性作用,在胆道梗阻的诊断中应用较广。随着磁共振技术的发展,扩散加权成像(DWI)在胆道梗阻早期诊断及肝功能评估等的应用也越来越多。本文就MRCP、DWI及两者联合在胆道梗阻中的应用进展进行综述。     

成人右半肝活体肝移植21例分析

目的 探讨成人右半肝活体肝移植供受者处理的关键性技术问题。方法 回顾性分析2007年4月至2009年5月首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肝胆外科完成21例成人右半肝活体肝移植的资料。 结果 供者术后无死亡,发生并发症23例次,按照Clavien系统分级：Ⅰ级15例次,Ⅱ级8例次。经积极非手术治疗后,所有供者均痊愈。受者术后发生胆道并发症7例,均经外科手术处理痊愈,术后1个月内死亡4例。移植物含肝中静脉4例,不含肝中静脉17例,两组受者1年存活率分别为75%与76%（χ2 = 1.000,P = 0.617）。 结论 右半肝活体肝移植是治疗终末期肝病尤其是各种原因导致的急性肝功能衰竭的重要手段。仔细术前评估,精细手术操作,合理地分配肝中静脉并保证移植物和残肝的功能性体积,术后密切监护、妥善处理并发症是供受者安全的重要保证。     

胆道数字成像技术在活体肝移植肝内胆道解剖分型及胆道切面确定中的应用

目的 评价术中胆道数字成像技术在活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)肝内胆道解剖分型和胆道切面确定中的作用及临床价值.方法 66例LDLT供者,通过术中胆道数字减影了解胆道分型及变异,结合金属标志物准确选择胆道离断位置,与手术结果比较,分析其在LDLT供者术中胆道解剖描述及切面确定中的作用.结果 所有供者均采用胆道数字成像技术对肝内胆道解剖进行分型,Ⅰ型(经典型)45例(68.2%),Ⅱ型(三叉型,胆总管由右前肝管、右后肝管、左肝管汇合而成)7例(10.6%),Ⅲ型(无右肝管主干,右后肝管汇入肝总管)13例(19.7%),Ⅳ型(无右肝管主干,右后肝管汇入左肝管)1例(1.5%),Ⅴ型(复杂分型)0例(0%).Ⅰ型所有供者均形成单一吻合口;Ⅱ型7例供者中4例形成2个吻合口,3例经成形或非成形后形成1个吻合口;Ⅲ型13例供者中9例形成2个吻合口,4例经成形后形成1个吻合口;Ⅳ型1例供者,2个胆道吻合口.所有供者都完成活体右半肝切取术.结论 术中胆道数字减影结合金属标志物可以精确显示肝内胆道解剖及变异并准确定位肝管切面,减少胆道吻合口数目,有助于供肝的安全获取和移植.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate biliary digital imaging technology in determining the type of the intrahepatic bile duct anatomy and the transection plane of the duct in right lobe living donor liver transplantation(LDLT). Methods Mobile digital subtraction angiography was performed to show the intrahepatic bile duct anatomy of 66 liver transplant donor candidates. Combined with metal markers, the bile duct transection plane was defined. Comparing with the actual results, the effect of digital imaging technology in determining the intrahepatic anatomical variations and transection plane of the duct in LDLT was evaluated. Results Intrahepatic bile duct anatomical variations were showed in all donors by using digital imaging technology. type Ⅰ (classical type) was identified in45 cases (68.2%), type Ⅱ (with triple confluence, the simultaneous emptying of the right anterior segmental duct, right posterior segmental duct and left hepatic duct into the common hepatic duct) in 7 cases ( 10.6% ), type Ⅲ (no right hepatic duct stem, right posterior segmental duct draining into common hepatic duct) in 13 cases ( 19. 7% ), type Ⅳ (no right hepatic duct stem, right posterior segmental duct draining into left hepatic duct) in 1 case (1.5%), and type Ⅴ (complex variation ) in no case (0%). As a result, cases of type Ⅰ form a single anastomosis. In type Ⅱ, four cases formed double anastomoses, three cases formed single anastomosis with or without ductoplasty. In type Ⅲ, two anastomoses were formed in 9 cases, single anastomosis in 4 cases with ductoplasty. The case of type Ⅳ had double anastomoses. In all cases right lobe liver were harvested.Conclusions Biliary digital subtraction image combined with metal markers accurately defines intrahepatic bile duct anatomy and the transection plane, helping to reduce number of bile duct anastomosis, and contributes to safe graft harvesting.     

MRCP在活体肝移植术前供者胆管解剖结构评估中应用价值的荟萃分析

目的 评价磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)在评估活体肝移植术前供者胆管解剖结构中的应用价值.方法 检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库等文摘数据库收录的中英文文献摘要,辅以Springer、OVID、Sciencedirect等全文数据库,按照Coehrane协作网推荐的诊断试验纳入标准筛选文献,采用循证医学软件包检验纳入文献的异质性,并选择相应的效应量合并模型,对纳入的研究进行加权合并,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、诊断比值比,绘制汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC),计算曲线下面积,最后进行敏感性分析.结果 符合纳入标准的文献有17篇,共有34项研究,异质性检验发现各研究间存在异质性,进行荟萃回归分析发现异质性来源为MRCP成像方法,按照不同的MRCP成像方法进行亚组分析,各亚组内异质性检验未发现异质性.按照固定效应模型获得厚层MRCP、三维MRCP、厚层MRCP与三维MRCP结合、增强MRCP等亚组的汇总敏感性分别为0.89、0.92、0.95和1.00,特异性分别为0.78、0.80、0.82和0.76,阳性预测值分别为4.1、4.5、5.2和4.1,阴性预测值分别为0.14、0.10、0.06和 0),诊断比值比分别为29、45、85和1228,SROC曲线下面积分别为0.83、0.92、0.96和0.99.结论 厚层MRCP和三维MRCP相结合在评估活体肝移植供者术前胆管解剖结构中具有很高的敏感性和特异性,完全可以满足术前对胆管结构评估的要求.     

胆道数字成像技术在活体肝移植肝内胆道解剖分型及胆道切面确定中的应用

Objective To evaluate biliary digital imaging technology in determining the type of the intrahepatic bile duct anatomy and the transection plane of the duct in right lobe living donor liver transplantation(LDLT). Methods Mobile digital subtraction angiography was performed to show the intrahepatic bile duct anatomy of 66 liver transplant donor candidates. Combined with metal markers, the bile duct transection plane was defined. Comparing with the actual results, the effect of digital imaging technology in determining the intrahepatic anatomical variations and transection plane of the duct in LDLT was evaluated. Results Intrahepatic bile duct anatomical variations were showed in all donors by using digital imaging technology. type Ⅰ (classical type) was identified in45 cases (68.2%), type Ⅱ (with triple confluence, the simultaneous emptying of the right anterior segmental duct, right posterior segmental duct and left hepatic duct into the common hepatic duct) in 7 cases ( 10.6% ), type Ⅲ (no right hepatic duct stem, right posterior segmental duct draining into common hepatic duct) in 13 cases ( 19. 7% ), type Ⅳ (no right hepatic duct stem, right posterior segmental duct draining into left hepatic duct) in 1 case (1.5%), and type Ⅴ (complex variation ) in no case (0%). As a result, cases of type Ⅰ form a single anastomosis. In type Ⅱ, four cases formed double anastomoses, three cases formed single anastomosis with or without ductoplasty. In type Ⅲ, two anastomoses were formed in 9 cases, single anastomosis in 4 cases with ductoplasty. The case of type Ⅳ had double anastomoses. In all cases right lobe liver were harvested.Conclusions Biliary digital subtraction image combined with metal markers accurately defines intrahepatic bile duct anatomy and the transection plane, helping to reduce number of bile duct anastomosis, and contributes to safe graft harvesting.     

胆道数字成像技术在活体肝移植肝内胆道解剖分型及胆道切面确定中的应用

Objective To evaluate biliary digital imaging technology in determining the type of the intrahepatic bile duct anatomy and the transection plane of the duct in right lobe living donor liver transplantation(LDLT). Methods Mobile digital subtraction angiography was performed to show the intrahepatic bile duct anatomy of 66 liver transplant donor candidates. Combined with metal markers, the bile duct transection plane was defined. Comparing with the actual results, the effect of digital imaging technology in determining the intrahepatic anatomical variations and transection plane of the duct in LDLT was evaluated. Results Intrahepatic bile duct anatomical variations were showed in all donors by using digital imaging technology. type Ⅰ (classical type) was identified in45 cases (68.2%), type Ⅱ (with triple confluence, the simultaneous emptying of the right anterior segmental duct, right posterior segmental duct and left hepatic duct into the common hepatic duct) in 7 cases ( 10.6% ), type Ⅲ (no right hepatic duct stem, right posterior segmental duct draining into common hepatic duct) in 13 cases ( 19. 7% ), type Ⅳ (no right hepatic duct stem, right posterior segmental duct draining into left hepatic duct) in 1 case (1.5%), and type Ⅴ (complex variation ) in no case (0%). As a result, cases of type Ⅰ form a single anastomosis. In type Ⅱ, four cases formed double anastomoses, three cases formed single anastomosis with or without ductoplasty. In type Ⅲ, two anastomoses were formed in 9 cases, single anastomosis in 4 cases with ductoplasty. The case of type Ⅳ had double anastomoses. In all cases right lobe liver were harvested.Conclusions Biliary digital subtraction image combined with metal markers accurately defines intrahepatic bile duct anatomy and the transection plane, helping to reduce number of bile duct anastomosis, and contributes to safe graft harvesting.     

成人右半肝活体肝移植供者的处理

目的 探讨成人右半肝活体肝移植供者处理的技术问题.方法 对我院2007年4月至2009年2月完成的19例成人右半肝活体肝移植供者资料进行回顾性分析.结果 19例右半肝移植物中带肝中静脉者4例,不带肝中静脉者15例;供肝重量为585～920 g,平均(727.32±117.01)g,与受者标准肝体积比为43%～67%(53.69%±1.77%),与受者重量比为0.82%～1.46%(1.10%±0.04%),供者残肝百分比为32%～55%(47%±2%),供者术中失血量400～1000 ml,平均(660±39.11)ml,输自体血0～735 ml,平均(216.37±62.28)ml,输新鲜冰冻血浆600～2000 ml,平均(789.47±75.66)ml,手术时间480～930min,平均(695.53±26.57)min.供者术后无死亡,发生并发症23例次,按照Clavien分级,Ⅰ级为15例次,Ⅱ级为8例次,经对症处理后均痊愈.住院时间13～58 d,平均(25.42±2.67)d.随访时间6～28月,全部供者均恢复正常工作生活.受者术后1年存活率为78.95%.结论 仔细术前评估,精细手术操作,合理地分配并保证移植物和残肝的功能性体积,术后密切监护、妥善处理并发症是供受者安全的重要保证.     

活体右半肝供体的安全性

目的 探讨活体右半肝供体的安全性。方法 对2002年1月至2005年6月施行的13例活体右半肝移植中供体的资料进行回顾性研究。不阻断入肝血流,在肝中静脉右侧,用超声刀离断肝组织得到右半供肝。通过计算得到标准肝体积及残余左半肝的比例。结果 右半供肝切取术平均失血490ml,平均输血440ml。围手术期平均输入人血白蛋白85g。1例供体门静脉分为3支,2例供体右后与右前胆管汇入左肝管,1例左外与左内胆管先后与右肝管汇合成肝总管,术中处理恰当,门静脉左干血流及左肝管胆汁引流保持通畅。2例供肝轻度脂肪变。术后第1天肝功能均有不同程度损害,但术后1周恢复到接近正常水平。术后并发症包括1例腹腔内出血,2例切口脂肪液化和1例乳糜漏。所有供体恢复好并回到原工作岗位。结论 只要保证左半肝血管与胆管通畅,残余肝体积在30％以上及手术对残余肝无大的损伤,右半供肝切取是安全的。     

成人间活体扩大右半肝移植治疗急性肝功能衰竭

目的介绍成人间活体扩大右半肝移植治疗急性肝功能衰竭的临床经验。方法对1例42岁男性急性肝功能衰竭合并肝性脑病Ⅲ期患者行活体扩大右半肝移植治疗。其45岁姐姐为供者,CT评估供者包含肝中静脉的扩大右半肝体积为728．4cm^2（801g）,供肝／受者体重比为1．3％。供肝之肝右、中静脉整形后与受者整形后之肝右静脉行端-侧吻合;供受者门静脉、肝动脉行端．端吻合。供肝胆管整形后与受者胆总管行端-端吻合。结果供、受者手术均成功。供者术后恢复顺利,受者术后8h恢复意识,14d后丙氨酸转氨酶、总胆红素等指标首次下降至正常水平。术后16d曾出现转氨酶明显升高,给予甲泼尼龙1000mg冲击治疗后恢复正常。随访至今,供受者已健康生存8个月,均未出现胆管、肝动脉及静脉回流等并发症。结论扩大右半肝移植在技术上完全可行。能为成人患者提供足够重量的移植物,尤其对于急性肝功能衰竭患者具有重要意义,术前精确的影像学评估,熟练的肝切除和肝移植技术是确保该类手术成功的关键因素。     

急诊右半肝活体肝移植治疗急性肝衰竭

目的 探讨急诊右半肝活体肝移植（living donor liver transplantation,LDLT）治疗急性肝衰竭（acute liver failure,ALF）的价值。方法 同顾性分析我院自2006年11月至2007年2月6例接受急诊LDLT的ALF患者临床资料,评价转归和疗效。结果 全部供体术后均未发生严重并发症或死亡,3周后恢复日常生活。全部受体均接受不含肝中静脉的右半肝,手术顺利,术后48h内苏醒,未发生神经系统并发症。与术前水平相比,血氨术后第1天明显下降至（53.3±21.6）μmol/L （P〈0.05）;总胆红素（TB）术后第1天即可恢复至（212±130）μmol/L（P〈0.05）,以后呈继续下降趋势;凝血酶原时间（PT）术后1周内即可降至正常水平（13±1）s（P〈0.05）;国际标准化比值（INR）变化与PT类似;丙氨酸转氨酶（ALT）和天冬氨酸转氨酶（AST）术后1周内持续下降,至术后第7天降至较低水平。1例患者术后第10天发生急性排斥反应经激素冲击疗法治愈,其余5例均未发生严重并发症。全组受体均于术后1月内康复出院。结论 急诊右半肝LDLT能有效治疗ALF。     

成人间右半肝活体肝移植的肝动脉重建

目的 探讨成人间右半肝活体肝移植的肝动脉重建的相关问题.方法 我院移植中心2007年5月至2008年10月,共完成17例成人活体右半肝肝移植,结合此组病例的临床资料,就肝动脉重建的术前评估、手术技巧和并发症防治进行回顾性分析.结果 17例右半肝供体均为单一肝右动脉供血,动脉平均直径3.1 mm,S4段主要由左肝动脉供血有12例(12/17,70.1%),由肝右动脉供血4例(4/17,23.5%),肝右和肝左动脉均发出动脉分支供血的1例.利用胆囊动脉扩大供肝肝右动脉吻合口径2例.供肝肝右动脉与受体肝右动脉吻合10例(10/17,60%),与受体肝左动脉吻合4例,与受体肝固有动脉吻合2例.吻合方式均为间断吻合,先吻合动脉后壁再吻合前壁,缝合针数12～16针.均为一次吻合成功,平均吻合时间(51±26)min,术后未出现肝动脉相关并发症.结论 对供肝S4段肝动脉的详细评估和保护是活体肝移植肝动脉重建的重点,不翻转供受体动脉的吻合方法可以有效降低手术难度,减少动脉并发症的发生.     

活体肝移植的胆道重建与胆道并发症

To systematically summarize the current status of surgical techniques in biliary reconstruction and biliary complications following living donor liver transplantation and analyze the biliary reconstruction techniques and difficulties in the prevention of biliary complications.The refinements of surgical techniques and successful prevention and therapeutic strategies for reducing biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation are discussed.     

成人间活体右半肝移植术中变异门静脉右支切取与重建技术

目的 探讨成人间活体右半肝移植术中变异门静脉支(APVB)切取与重建的技巧.方法 2002年1月至2007年4月,共实施70例成人间活体右半肝移植.术前肝脏血管三维CT成像显示供肝动脉及静脉走向,70例右半供肝中有9例门静脉分支变异,其中7例为Ⅱ型变异,2例为Ⅲ型变异.除1例供者行狭窄桥状连接单口切取APVB外,其余8例均采用供者优先的原则即距门静脉主干2～3mm处双口切断APVB.Ⅱ型变异中有2例双口切取其右前、右后支成形为一个开口后与受者门静脉主干吻合,4例右前、右后支分别与受者门静脉左、右支吻合,1例行右前、右后支间狭窄桥状组织连接单口切取后与受者门静脉主干单口吻合.Ⅲ型变异中有1例双口切取其右前、右后支分别与受者门静脉支双口吻合,1例双口切取后行新型的U形血管移植物间置与受者门静脉主干单口吻合.结果 9例受者均无门静脉狭窄或血栓、肝动脉狭窄或血栓以及肝静脉流出道狭窄等血管并发症发生.1例供者术后3 d并发门静脉血栓,手术取栓及门静脉壁修补成形后痊愈.新型的U形血管移植物间置重建术后通畅,无并发症发生.结论 成人间活体右半肝移植术中采用供者优先的原则双口切取APVB、双口吻合重建以及新型的U形血管间置等门静脉重建技术是安全可行的,未增加手术难度,且临床效果良好.