Worsening Renal Function in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Treated With Ultrafiltration: Predictors and Outcomes

BackgroundUltrafiltration (UF) is used to treat patients with diuretic-resistant acute decompensated heart failure. The aim of this study was to identify predictors and the effect of worsening renal failure (WRF) on mortality in patients treated with UF.Methods and ResultsBased on changes in serum creatinine, 99 patients treated with UF were divided into WRF and control groups. Overall creatinine increased from 1.9 ± 9.7 to 2.2 ± 2.0 mg/dL (P < .001), and WRF developed in 41% of the subjects. The peak UF rate was higher in the WRF group in univariate analysis (174 ± 45 vs 144 ± 42 mL/h; P = .03). Based on multivariate analysis, aldosterone antagonist treatment (odds ratio [OR] 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–13.46, P = .04), heart rate ≤65 beats/min (OR 6.03, 95% CI 1.48–48.42; P = .03), and E/E′ ≥15 (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.26–17.55; P = .04) at hospital admission were associated with WRF. Patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤60 mg/dL who developed WRF during UF had a 75% 1-year mortality rate.ConclusionsWRF occurred frequently during UF. Increased LV filling pressures, lower heart rate, and treatment with aldosterone antagonist at hospital admission can identify patients at increased risk for WRF. Patients with baseline GFR ≤60 mg/dL and WRF during UF have an extremely high 1-year mortality rate.     

A Patient with Heart Failure and Worsening Kidney Function

There is high prevalence of CKD, defined by reduced GFR, in patients with heart failure. Reduced kidney function is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population. The cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) involves a bidirectional relationship between the heart and kidneys whereby dysfunction in either may exacerbate the function of the other, but this syndrome has been difficult to precisely define because it has many complex physiologic, biochemical, and hormonal abnormalities. The pathophysiology of CRS is not completely understood, but potential mechanisms include reduced kidney perfusion due to decreased forward flow, increased right ventricular and venous pressure, and neurohormonal adaptations. Treatment options include inotropic medications; diuretics; ultrafiltration; and medications, such as β-blockers, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and more novel treatments that focus on unique aspects of the pathophysiology. Recent observational studies suggest that treatments that result in a decrease in venous pressure and lead to hemoconcentration may be associated with improved outcomes. Patients with CRS that is not responsive to medical interventions should be considered for ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation, or combined heart and kidney transplantation.     

Worsening Renal Function and Outcome in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction and the Impact of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Treatment

Background

Worsening renal function (WRF) associated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition does not confer excess risk in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Objectives

The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between WRF and outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and the interaction with RAAS blockade.

Methods

In 3,595 patients included in the I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and development of WRF after initiation of irbesartan or placebo were examined. We examined the association between WRF and the first occurrence of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (primary outcome in this analysis) and the interaction with randomized treatment.

Results

Estimated GFR decreased early with irbesartan treatment and remained significantly lower than in the placebo group. WRF developed in 229 (6.4%) patients and occurred more frequently with irbesartan treatment (8% vs. 4%). Overall, WRF was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 1.85; p = 0.008). Although the risk related to WRF was greater in the irbesartan group (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.28; p = 0.002) than with placebo (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.79; p = 0.73), the interaction between treatment and WRF on outcome was not significant in an adjusted analysis.

Conclusions

The incidence of WRF in HFpEF was similar to that previously reported in HFrEF but more frequent with irbesartan than with placebo. WRF after initiation of irbesartan treatment in HFpEF was associated with excess risk, in contrast to WRF occurring with RAAS blockade in HFrEF.     

Effect of Losartan on the Cardiac and Renal Function in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Objectives To explore the effect of losartan on cardiac and renal function in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods Sixty-five patients with CHF were divided into two groups using a randomized, control and single blind method: losartan group (n=30) and convention group (n=35), with a treatment course of 8 weeks for both groups. The concentrations of cystatin C (cys C) in serum, microamount albumin (MA) in urine were measured by immunoturbidimetry. The concentration of aquaporin-2(AQP-2)was determined by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the heart contractile function was measured by echocardiography before and after treatment respectively. Results Comparing with routine treatment group, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd) decreased significantly, while left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) increased significantly in losartan group. The levels of cys C in serum and MA, AQP-2 in urine were significantly lower in losartan group than in routine treatment group. Conclusion Losartan can improve cardiac and renal function in patients with CHF.     

奈西立肽对心力衰竭患者肾功能及预后影响的研究进展

现今社会心力衰竭发病率的增加及高病死率严重威胁人类健康,奈西立肽作为一种治疗急性心力衰竭的新药,已广泛应用于临床。其安全性的分析及对预后的影响也在不断的探讨中。     

Levosimendan Improves Renal Function in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Comparison with Dobutamine

Background Levosimendan is a relatively new cardiac inotropic agent with calcium sensitizing activity. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of levosimendan (L) and dobutamine (D) on renal function in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure (HF). Method The present study included 88 consecutive patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated HF (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 3–4) requiring inotropic therapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either L or D for intravenous inotropic support. Diuretic therapy was kept constant during infusions. Renal function values, including serum creatinine (CR), blood urea nitrogen, 24-h urinary output levels and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured just prior to and 24 h after the infusions in all patients, and 48 and 72 h after the infusions in every second patient in both groups. The pre and post-infusion values of renal function and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated. Results LVEF increased significantly in both groups. Those in L showed a significant improvement in calculated GFR after 24 h, whereas those in D showed no significant change (median in change in L:+15.3%, median change in D: −1.33%). Furthermore, in the L group a significant improvement was observed in calculated GFR after 72 h compared to baseline levels, whereas in D no significant change (median change in L:+45.45%, median change in D: +0.09%) was seen. Both agents improved 24-h urinary output. Conclusion Levosimendan seems to provide beneficial effects in terms of improvement in renal function compared to dobutamine in patients with heart failure who require inotropic therapy.     

Progression of Renal Impairment and Chronic Kidney Disease in Chronic Heart Failure: An Analysis From GISSI-HF

Background

Data on the natural change in renal function in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) are limited.

Prognostic Impact of Worsening Renal Function in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Report From the JASPER Registry

BackgroundThe characteristics and prognostic impact of persistent worsening renal function (WRF; defined as an increase in serum creatinine of >0.3 mg/dL during hospitalization) on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have not yet been fully examined.Methods and ResultsThis was a post hoc analysis of the Japanese Heart Failure Syndrome with Preserved Ejection Fraction (JASPER) registry. We divided 523 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the WRF group (n = 92 [17.6%]) and the non-WRF group (n = 431 [82.4%]). The WRF group showed a higher systolic blood pressure on admission and a higher prevalence of atherosclerotic diseases, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that systolic blood pressure and loop diuretics were associated with WRF development (P < .05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis (median, 732 days) showed a higher all-cause death in the WRF group, as well as a higher composite end point of all-cause death or rehospitalization for HF (log-rank P < .001). The Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed WRF to be a predictor of both all-cause death (hazard ratio, 2.725; 95% confidence interval, 1.709–4.344; P < .001) and the composite end point (hazard ratio, 2.083; 95% confidence interval, 1.488–2.914; P < .001).ConclusionsPersistent WRF was associated with systolic blood pressure, atherosclerotic diseases, diuretics, and poor postdischarge prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.     

Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Detecting Acute Kidney Injury,Persistent Renal Impairment,and All-Cause Mortality Following Decongestive Therapy in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

BackgroundNew urinary biomarkers, such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and interleukin-18 (IL-18), are proposed to allow a more reliable early diagnosis and prognosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Our aim was to compare the predictive value of urinary NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 for the occurrence of AKI, persistent renal impairment, and mortality in ADHF.Methods and ResultsEighty-three patients admitted for ADHF were analyzed. Urinary creatinine (Cr), NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 were measured at baseline. Serum Cr was measured daily during the next 4 days and again at outpatient follow-up after 6 months. Mortality data were prospectively collected. Urinary NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 were modestly correlated with each other (Spearman ρ ≤0.61) and poorly correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; Spearman ρ ≤0.28). None predicted AKI, defined as a 25% decrease in eGFR, during the index hospitalization, but urinary IL-18/Cr was the strongest predictor of persistently elevated serum Cr ≥0.3 mg/dL after 6 months compared with baseline (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.674; P = .013). Urinary IL-18 was also significantly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.87; P = .001).ConclusionsLike urinary NGAL, urinary KIM-1 and IL-18 are relatively modest predictors of AKI in ADHF. Among these novel renal biomarkers examined, further investigations regarding the prognostic value of urinary IL-18 are warranted.     

Renal Hemodynamic Effects in Patients with Moderate to Severe Heart Failure during Chronic Treatment with Trandolapril

Treatment of patients with severe heart failure by ACE inhibition is often limited by worsening of renal function. To evaluate whether trandolapril, a potent lipophilic ACE inhibitor, affects renal function in severe heart failure, we studied 12 patients with severe heart failure treated with only diuretics and digoxin. Patients received increasing oral dosages of trandolapril (0, 1, and 2 mg) on 3 consecutive days (A). Patients were then discharged on 2 mg trandolapril bid and re-evaluated 8 weeks later (B). Mean arterial and pulmonary wedge pressures decreased by maximal 14% and 43%, and stroke volume and work indexes increased by 24% and 20% at A and similarly at B (11, 45, and 25 ns and 33%, respectively). In contrast, heart rate, systemic resistance, pulmonary artery pressure, and cardiac index decreased by 6%, 23%, 29%, and 17%, respectively, at only A. Renal blood flow improved by approximately 40% both at A and B. In contrast, the glomerular filtration rate decreased by 25% at only B, whereas serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and urine osmolality were unaffected during the study. Norepinephrine, angiotensin II, and aldosterone levels decreased by approximately 30%, 60%, and 65%, respectively, at both A and B. Renin levels increased by 136% at A and remained elevated at B. Thus, whereas the initial systemic vasodilating and inotropic effects did not persist, long-term trandolapril results in sustained neurohormonal modulation, reduced preload, and improved organ perfusion, indicated by a persistent increase in renal blood flow and preservation of renal function in severe heart failure.