Noninvasive Evidence of Shortened Atrial Refractoriness during Sinus Rhythm in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Shortening of the atrial refractory period is the key feature of atrial electrical remodeling during atrial fibrillation (AF). During sinus rhythm (SR), assessment of the atrial refractoriness is hampered by the fact that the atrial repolarization wave (Ta wave) is largely obscured by the following QRST complex. The purpose of this study was to study the Ta wave in subjects with paroxysmal AF during SR with third‐degree atrioventricular (AV) block, and in matched controls. Methods: Fifteen patients (mean age 70 ± 10 years, five males) with paroxysmal AF undergoing AV‐nodal ablation were studied. Fifteen age‐ and gender‐matched subjects (mean age 71 ± 9 years, five males) with third‐degree AV block, without a history of heart disease, were used as controls. Standard 12‐lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded and transformed to orthogonal leads and studied using P‐wave signal averaging technique. Results: The P to Ta interval was shorter (408 ± 47 ms vs 451 ± 53 ms, P = 0.017) and in Lead Y the Ta peak location was earlier (156 ± 31 ms vs 187 ± 34 ms, P = 0.002) in subjects with paroxysmal AF than in the controls. The P‐wave duration (126 ± 15 ms vs 129 ± 17 ms, P = 0.59) and morphology was similar in AF patients and controls. Conclusions: In this study, the ECG signs of shorter atrial refractoriness associated with a history of AF are visualized for the first time during SR. The finding of the earlier location of the PTa peak in AF subjects implies that a possible indicator of increased arrhythmia susceptibility may be visible already in the unprocessed ECG.     

Left Atrial Ablation at the Anatomic Areas of Ganglionated Plexi for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Modification of left atrial ganglionated plexi (GP) is a promising technique for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) but its therapeutic efficacy is not established. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of anatomic GP modification by means of an implantable arrhythmia monitoring device. Methods: In 56 patients with paroxysmal AF, radiofrequency ablation at anatomic sites, where the main clusters of GP have been identified in the left atrium, was performed. In all patients, an electrocardiogram monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was implanted before (n = 7) or immediately after (n = 49) AF ablation. Results: Average duration of the procedure was 142 ± 18 min and average fluoroscopy time 20 ± 7 min. In total, 53–81 applications of RF energy were delivered (mean of 18.2 ± 3.8 at each of the four areas of GP ablation). Heart rate variability was assessed in 31 patients. Standard deviation of RR intervals over the entire analyzed period, the root mean square of differences between successive RR intervals, and high frequencies decreased, while HRmin, HRmean, and LF to HF ratio increased immediately postablation; these values returned to baseline 6 months after the procedure. At end of 12‐month follow‐up, 40 (71%) patients were free of arrhythmia recurrence. Ten patients had AF recurrence, two patients had left atrial flutter, and four patients had episodes of flutter as well as AF recurrence. Duration of episodes of AF after ablation gradually decreased over the follow‐up period. Conclusions: Regional ablation at the anatomic sites of the left atrial GP can be safely performed and enables maintenance of sinus rhythm in 71% of patients with paroxysmal AF for a 12‐month period. (PACE 2010; 33:1231–1238)     

Atrial and Ventricular Pressures in Atrial Flutter

The hemodynamic effects of atrial flutter (AF) are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the changes in atrial and ventricular pressures after induction of AF. In 23 patients with paroxysmal AF (age 59 ± 9 years), a hemodynamic study was performed both during sinus rhythm and after induction of the tachyarrhythmia. During AF, 13 patients showed a fixed 2:1 AV conduction and 10 patients showed variable conduction. Mean right and left atrial pressures increased (P < 0.001) and right and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures decreased (P < 0.001) after induction of AF. Roth the increase in mean atrial pressures and the decrease in ventricular end-diastolic pressures were present either in the patients with fixed 2:1 AV (heart rate: 133 ± 15 beats/min) or in those with variable conduction (heart rate 96 ± 15 beats/min), but were more marked in the former. AF produces an impairment of atrial function, as evidenced by the increase in mean atrial pressures and reduction in ventricular end-diastolic pressures in the absence of an elevated heart rate. The mechanisms responsible for the increase in mean atrial pressures are unknown; however, atrial contractions against closed AV valves seem to play an important role.     

Ventricular Pauses during Atrial Fibrillation Predict Relapse after Electrical Cardioversion: A Prospective Study

Aims: To investigate the use of ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring in atrial fibrillation (AF) to predict recurrence after electrical cardioversion (ECV). Methods: RR interval variables were obtained from 24 hours ECGs recorded before ECV in 119 patients (85 men, age 66 ± 10 years) with persistent AF. Patients were followed for 1 month. Results: Of the 119 patients, 16 (13%) failed ECV and 65 (55%) were in AF at 1 week and 81 (68%) at 1 month after ECV. The maximum RR interval (RR‐max) and the minimum RR interval (RR‐min) during AF were found to be reproducible. The RR‐max was longer in those who had AF 1 week (2.55 ± 0.49 vs 2.01 ± 0.52 seconds, P = 0.005) and 1 month (2.56 ± 0.50 vs 1.89 ± 0.43 ms; P < 0.001) after ECV than in those who maintained sinus rhythm. Those in AF at 1 month included more patients with RR‐max ≥ 2.8 seconds (31% vs 11% P = 0.021). The average heart rate was lower in patients with RR‐max ≥ 2.8 seconds, but the average rate was not predictive of AF recurrence. Conclusion: Ventricular pauses during AF predict relapse after ECV. (PACE 2010; 934–938)     

Initial Experience with Mode Switching in a Dual Sensor, Dual Chamher Pacemaker in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

Mode switching algorithms have been developed to avoid tracking of atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL) during DDD(R) pacing. Upon recognition of AF or AFL, the mode is switched to a nontracking, sensor driven mode. The Vitatron Diamond model 800 pacemaker does this on a beat-to-beat basis. Atrial events occurring within a “physiological range” (± 15 beats/min) calculated from a running average of the atrial rate are tracked. When atrial events are not tracked the escape interval is either determined by the sensor(s) or by a fallback algorithm thereby preventing large increases in V-V interval during mode switching. Loss of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony by atrial premature beats and after an episode of AF or AFL is prevented by atrial synchronization pulses (ASP), which are delivered after a safe interval (timed out from the sensed premature atrial event) has expired and before delivery of the next ventricular stimulus. We implanted 26 such devices in 18 men and 8 women with symptomatic second- or third-degree AV block and paroxysmal AF or AFL. Their ages ranged from 18–84 years (mean 60), and the follow-up ranged from 2–13 months (mean 8). During pacemaker check-up, exercise testing or 24-hour Holter monitoring one or more episodes of mode switching was documented in 8 patients. In these 8 patients a smooth transition (ventricular rate) from sinus rhythm to AF or AFL was documented on one or more occasions, without inappropriate increase in ventricular rate in the DDDR mode. None of the patients complained of palpitations. Appropriate rate response was seen in all patients during Holter monitoring and exercise. Restoration of AV synchrony with ASP was documented many times. In 2 patients the DDIR mode was programmed due to intermittent synchronization of ventricular stimuli to near incessant supraventricular tachycardia, which sometimes gave rise to asymptomatic slightly irregular ventricular paced rhythms below WO beats/min. Recognition of AF or AFL was reliable. No inappropriate increases in ventricular pacing rate were seen at the onset of or during AF or AFL. ASP is an effective method of maintaining AV synchrony and avoiding competitive atrial pacing.     

Incidence and Predictive Factors of Atrial Fibrillation in Paced Patients

We have designed a prospective observational study to analyze the incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation (AF) during a long follow-up, in a large population. Atrial fibrillation episodes were documented by the fallback mode switch (FMS) provided by implanted pacemakers. We have included 377 patients (61% men). The pacing indications were atrioventricular (AV) block (49%), sinus node disease (SND, 16%), bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (BTS, 5%), AV block + SND (19%), AV block + BTS (6%), and BTS + SND (5%). The mean age at implant was 75 ± 12 (range 28–95). Atrial fibrillation before inclusion was documented in 10% of patients. Drug therapy at first follow-up included beta-adrenergic blockers (17% of the patients), amiodarone (13%), and others (16%). The mean follow-up was 30 ± 24 weeks. At least one AF episode was stored during follow-up in the memory of 169 pacemakers (45%). Among patients without history of AF at implant, 46% had documented FMS during follow-up. Patients with AF received more antiplatelet medications than patients without AF (P = 0.03). In patients with AF, New York Heart Association functional class was slightly higher, amiodarone and sotalol were more often prescribed, and the proportion of hypertension was higher than in patients without AF. However, these trends were not statistically significant. A significant higher incidence of premature atrial beats was observed in patients with AF than patients without AF (P < 0.0002). Patients with AF had a lower atrial percentage of paced events (55%) than patients without AF (63%, P < 0.02). These preliminary results confirm the high incidence of AF in paced patients and suggest a preventive effect of atrial pacing. The effects of other clinical variables may be confirmed with a longer follow-up in a larger population.     

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation During Sinus Tachycardia Induced by Exercise in Patients with Implantable Atrial Defibrillators

Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for appropriate operation of an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD). However, during episodes of sinus tachycardia, distinction between AF and sinus rhythm (SR) using the "quiet interval" and "baseline crossing" analysis in the detection algorithm of the IAD may be difficult. The efficacy of this AF detection algorithm was tested in five patients implanted with an IAD (MFTRIX, Model 3000 or 3020, InControl Inc.) during treadmill exercise testing. The IADs were programmed to Monitor Mode with a wake up cycle of 1 minute for AF detection using the device nominal parameters or modified parameters, and to mark rhythms appropriate for shock delivery. A mean peak heart rate of 137 ± 26 beats/min was reached during maximum exercise, and one patient developed transient AF. Seventy-eight (75 in SR, 3 in AF) and 91 (89 in SR, 2 in AF) runs of AF detection were performed using the nominal and modified parameters, respectively. The IAD detected AF and SR accurately, except for one episode of false-positive AF detection during sinus tachycardia at the nominal settings, but inappropriate shocks were prevented by minimum RR interval criteria that limited discharge at high heart rate. These results indicate that the AF detection algorithm in the IAD may become more vulnerable to false-positive AF detection during sinus tachycardia, which were avoided by reprogramming the Quiet Interval and minimum RR interval criteria for AF detection. Exercise testing appeared useful to program optimal settings of the IAD in preparation for daily activities.     

Optimized Standby Rate Reduces the Ventricular Rate Variability in Pacemaker Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Patients with chronic atria! fibrillation (AF) and symptomatic bradycardia often receive ventricular-based pacemakers. However, many of these patients continue to have symptoms of palpitations, which may be due to ventricular rate variability. It has previously been shown that contin uous ventricular pacing during AF has a stabilizing effect on the ventricular rate. Hence, a study was initiated to determine whether a patient-specific optimal ventricular standby rate that reduces the ventricular rate variability, without over-pacing, could be predicted. A ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) pacing algorithm that increases the pacing rate until instability is reduced below a threshold was developed. The VRS algorithm was utilized to determine a patient-specific standby rate in 15 patients with chronic AF, intact AV nodal conduction, and implanted pacemakers. The computer algorithm controlled a pacemaker programmer to automatically change the pacemaker's ventricular pacing rate via telemetry. Patients were studied for 15 minutes with VRS and for 15 minutes with 50 ppm fixed rate pacing (control). The results were as follows: (1) VRS versus control = P < 0.05; (2) mean ventricular pacing rate (ppm): 77 ± 13 versus 50 ± 0; (3) mean ventricular rate (beats/mm); 82 ± 13 versus 79 ± 12; (4) ventricular rate coefficient of variation (%): 11 ± 1 versus 22 ± 5; (5) percent pacing: 75 ± 8 versus 6 ± 8; (6) percent of RR intervals less than minimum pacing interval eliminated: 58 ± 12; (8) regression analysis: mean VRS pacing rate (beats/min) = 0.96 X mean control ventricular rate + 2.3, r²= 0.85. We concluded that: (1) a moderate increase in the ventricular pacing rate was required to substantially stabilize the ventricular rate; (2) the resulting mean ventricular rate increased marginally: (3) a majority of RR cycles less than each patient's minimum pacing interval were eliminated; and (4) there was a linear relationship between the mean ventricular rate during control and the optimal ventricular pacing rate. Thus, a ventricular pacing rate close to the mean ventricular rate during control consistently reduced the ventricular variability. Although pacing at an increased ventricular standby rate reduces variability at rest, the optimal solution would likely be an adaptive rate algorithm that changes the ventricular standby rate as the mean intrinsic rate varies.     

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Termination on Clinical Outcome after Ablation in Relation to the Duration of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Whether procedural termination of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is necessary for optimal clinical efficacy still remains controversial. We sought to characterize the patients with persistent AF in whom procedural AF termination impacted an improved clinical outcome after ablation. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 132 patients (61.0 ± 9.3 years, 114 males) undergoing catheter ablation of persistent AF (duration 3 years, median). A stepwise ablation approach including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial substrate ablation targeting complex fractionated and high‐frequency electrograms was performed with desired endpoint of AF termination. Results: Overall, 90 patients (68%) were free from recurrent arrhythmias at 20 ± 11 months of follow‐up after one or two procedures. The left atrial diameter and continuous AF duration according to medical history were associated with the outcome (P = 0.002 and P< 0.001, respectively). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the continuous AF duration was the only independent predictor of recurrent arrhythmias (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.10–1.23, P < 0.001). In patients with AF duration of ≥3 years, the clinical success was comparable regardless of whether AF termination was achieved or not (log‐rank, P = 0.27). In the remaining patients with AF duration of <3 years, procedural AF termination was associated with a higher arrhythmia‐free rate than when AF was sustained after ablation (log‐rank, P = 0.023). Conclusion: Extensive ablation to terminate AF might not be warranted in patients with a longer AF duration. On the contrary, procedural AF termination could be associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with a shorter AF duration with a less proarrhythmic substrate. (PACE 2012;35:1436–1443)     

Effect of Varying Atrial Sensitivity, AV Interval, and Detection Algorithm on Automatic Mode Switching

Automatic mode switching (AMS) is absolutely dependent on atrial tachyarrhythmia detection. The effects of programming several features that could influence tachyarrhythmia detection were assessed in 18 patients (six women; mean age 64 years) with pacemakers having AMS capability. The atrial electrogram amplitude in sinus rhythm at implant (SR-EGM), last measured atrial sensing threshold prior to tachycardia (A-SENS), and atrial sensing threshold for effective AMS during atrial tachyarrhythmia (AMS-SENS) were obtained. Additionally, ten patients had AV intervals increased from 60 to 200 ms, while seven patients had detection algorithms made more stringent from 5 beats at 150 beats/min to 11 beats at 200 beats/min to assess their effects on AMS efficacy. Results: Sensitivities: Mean SR-EGM = 3.55 mV; mean A-SENS = 2.06 mV; and mean AMS-SENS = 1.46 mV. Fourteen patients developed atrial fibrillation and four atrial flutter. Thirteen of 14 patients who developed atrial fibrillation sensed adequately at ≥ 1.0 mV in normal sinus rhythm (NSR), but only six patients had effective AMS at these settings in atrial fibrillation. Three of four patients who developed atrial flutter had effective AMS at ≥ 2.0 mV. AV Interval: AMS was effective in eight of ten patients at AV intervals up to 200 ms. One patient lost AMS at an AV interval of 120 ms. Algorithm: In two of seven patients, AMS was not effective if the detection algorithm was more stringent than five beats at 150 beats/min. Conclusions: (1) In atrial fibrillation, effective AMS requires more sensitive atrial settings than in NSR: (2) AV intervals as short as 120 ms can interfere with AMS function; and (3) More stringent detection algorithms may be inappropriate for effective AMS function.     

Atrial fibrillation ablation using a closed irrigation radiofrequency ablation catheter

Background: Catheter ablation is an effective therapy for symptomatic, medically refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Open‐irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheters produce transmural lesions at the cost of increased fluid delivery. In vivo models suggest closed‐irrigated RF catheters create equivalent lesions, but clinical outcomes are limited. Methods: A cohort of 195 sequential patients with symptomatic AF underwent stepwise AF ablation (AFA) using a closed‐irrigation ablation catheter. Recurrence of AF was monitored and outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Mean age was 59.0 years, 74.9% were male, 56.4% of patients were paroxysmal and mean duration of AF was 5.4 years. Patients had multiple comorbidities including hypertension (76.4%), tobacco abuse (42.1%), diabetes (17.4%), and obesity (mean body mass index 30.8). The median follow‐up was 55.8 weeks. Overall event‐free survival was 73.6% with one ablation and 77.4% after reablation (reablation rate was 8.7%). Median time to recurrence was 26.9 weeks. AF was more likely to recur in patients being treated with antiarrhythmic therapy at the time of last follow‐up (recurrence rate 30.3% with antiarrhythmic drugs, 13.2% without antiarrhythmic drugs; hazard ratio [HR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–4.4, P = 0.024) and in those with a history of AF greater than 2 years duration (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.9, P = 0.038). Conclusions: Our study represents the largest cohort of patients receiving AFA with closed‐irrigation ablation catheters. We demonstrate comparable outcomes to those previously reported in studies of open‐irrigation ablation catheters. Given the theoretical benefits of a closed‐irrigation system, a large head‐to‐head comparison using this catheter is warranted. (PACE 2012; 35:506–513)     

Atrial Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White and Atrial Fibrillation: Absence of Rate Adaptation of Intraatrial Conduction Time Parameters

Clinical electrophysiology has not yet clearly defined atrial features that can predict spontaneous occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this work was to identify atrial electrophysiological features that can distinguish Wolff-Parkinson-White patients with spontaneous AF from those without this arrhythmia. Sixty-nine patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White were divided into three groups: group I (16 patients) with spontaneous AF; group II (35 patients) with reciprocating tachycardia but not AF; and group III (18 patients) asymptomatic without documented arrhythmias. Atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) and intraatrial conduction times in response to premature extrastimuli were analyzed. The latter were evaluated as the A₁A₂ interval minus the correspondent S₁S₂ interval (A₁A₂-S₁S₂), S₂A₂ and the interval A₁A₂ following the shortest S₁S₂ producing atrial activation (FRP'). All the parameters have been evaluated in two atrial sites and at two atrial pacing cycle lengths (600 and 400 ms). For all the parameters, the difference (“gradient”) was calculated between the values of the same parameter measured at the atrial pacing cycle length of 600 ms and that found at the atrial pacing cycle length of 400 ms in the same recording site in each patient was calculated. Atrial FRP did not differ significantly in the three groups. Intraatrial conduction parameters, evaluated in the high right atrium (HRA), were longer when measured at an atrial pacing of 400 ms and showed a lack of rate adaptation in patients with spontaneous AF. In group I patients in particular, FRP’became longer with the increase of atrial rate, while in groups 2 and 3, it usually shortened. The mean gradient of HRA FRP’was -15.0 ± 19 ms in group I as compared to 5.7 ±13 ms in group II and 6.4± 13 ms in group III (P < 0.001); sensitivity. specificity, and negative predictive value of a negative gradient in the identification of patients with spontaneous AF, were, respectively, 83%, 75%, and 93%. Patients from groups 2 and 3 did not differ in any of the analyzed parameters. Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White and spontaneous AF showed prolonged intraatrial conduction times and a different behavior in response to modification of heart rate. (PACE 1997;20[Pt. I]:1318-1327)     

Effects of Verapamil on Electrophysiological Properties in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Verapamil is used to control ventricular response during atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited data is available on the effects of verapamil on atrial vuinerability in human AF. The effects of intravenous verapamil (0.15 mg/kg) on electrophysiological properties of the atrium were investigated in 12 patients with documented paroxysmal AF by electrophysiological studies. Sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time, and the effective refractory period of the right atrium were not significantly affected by verapamil. The intraatrial conduction delay zone was significantly increased (33 ± 20 msec before verapamil versus 50 ± 22 msec after verapamil, P < 0.01, and the maximal intraatrial conduction delay was also significantly prolonged by verapamil, both to the His bundle region (30 ±12 msec before verapamil versus 42 ± 15 msec after verapamil. P < 0.01) and to the coronary sinus (40 ± 15 msec before verapamil versus 53 ± 17 msec after verapamil, P < 0.01). The fragmented atrial activity zone was significantly increased (15 ± 14 msec before verapamil versus 25 ± 22 msec after verapamil, P < 0.02), and the percentile fragmented atrial activity was also significantiy increased by verapami] (149 ± 18 msec before verapamil versus 174 ± 44 msec after verapamil, P < 0.05). The repetitive atriaJ firing zone remained unchanged. Sustained AF spontaneousiy occurred in only one patient after the administration of verapamil. Thus, verapamil may modulate the abnormal atrial electrophysiology in paroxysmal AF, and wouid favor production of atrial reentry.     

Renin-angiotensin system blocker use may be associated with suppression of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation

Introduction: An additional approach may be essential to reduce recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We examined the efficacy of renin‐angiotensin system blockers (RAS‐B) in suppressing AF recurrences after PVI. Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied 264 consecutive patients (195 male, median age: 63 years) who underwent successful PVI of paroxysmal (n = 94) or persistent AF (n = 170). RAS‐B treatment was performed in 145 patients (angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; n = 13, angiotensin receptor blockers; n = 129, both; n = 3). Echocardiography was performed before and 3 months after the ablation to examine the occurrence of left atrial structural reverse remodeling (LA‐RR). After a median follow‐up of 195 (interquartile range: 95–316) days, AF recurred in 51 (19.3%) patients. A Cox regression analysis revealed that AF recurrence was significantly lower in the patients with RAS‐B than in those without (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23–0.71], P = 0.002). After a multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, the use of RAS‐B (HR = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.19–0.77], P = 0.007) and type of AF (HR = 0.30 [95% CI: 0.13–0.66], P = 0.003) were the independent predictors for AF recurrence during the entire follow‐up. Although effect of RAS‐B was not significant during the early follow‐up (<3 month), it was the only independent predictor during the late follow‐up (>3 months) (HR = 0.21 [95% CI: 0.08–0.53], P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in LA‐RR occurrence regarding RAS‐B medication. The use of RAS‐B was an independent predictor of late AF recurrences irrespective of an early LA‐RR occurrence. Conclusions: Treatment with RAS‐B significantly reduced the AF recurrence after PVI. This benefit became more prominent 3 months after the PVI. (PACE 2011; 34:296–303)     

Atrial Septal Pacing:

Atrial pacing may prevent the onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) because of: (1) prevention of the relative bradycardia that triggers paroxysmal AF; (2) prevention of the bradycardia induced dispersion of refractoriness; (3)suppression or reduction of premature atrial contractions that initiate reentry and predispose to AF; (4) preservation of AV synchrony, which might prevent switch induced changes in atrial repolarization predisposing to AF. Atrial pacing locations that decrease atrial activation and dispersion of refractoriness may be preferable in patients with a history of AF. Two different interatrial septum sites have been proposed: the Bachmann's bundle and the coronary sinus ostium. The results of two prospective randomized studies indicate that septal pacing, when compared to the traditional right atrial appendage pacing, significantly reduces : (1) paroxysmal AF recurrences and burden; and (2) progression to chronic AF. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. II]:850–854)     

Predictive Capability of Left Atrial Size Measured by CT,TEE, and TTE for Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Following Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Background: Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been well established and is in part related to left atrial (LA) size. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive capability of LA diameter (LAD) and LA volume (LAV) by echocardiography and computed tomography (CT) to determine success in patients undergoing RFCA of AF. Methods: Eighty‐eight patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who had undergone RFCA and had a prior transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), and CT were enrolled in the study. TTE LADs and LV ejection fraction as well as TEE LADs and LAVs in three views were recorded. CT LAVs were also recorded. Clinical parameters prior to ablation as well as at 1‐year follow‐up were assessed. Results: A total of 40 (45%) patients with paroxysmal AF and 48 (55%) patients with persistent AF were analyzed. Paroxysmal AF patients had a RFCA success rate of 88% at 1 year with persistent AF patients having a 52% success rate (P < 0.001). A CT‐derived LAV ≥ 117 cc was associated with an odds ratio (OR) for recurrence of 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]=[1.4–16.4], P = 0.01) while a LAV ≥130 cc was associated with an OR for recurrence of 22.0 (95% CI =[2.5–191.0], P = 0.005) after adjustment for persistent AF. Conclusions: LA dimensions and AF type are highly predictive of AF recurrence following RFCA. LAV by CT has significant predictive benefit over standard LADs in severely enlarged atria even after adjustment for AF type. (PACE 2010; 532–540)     

Spontaneous Reinitiation of Atrial Fibrillation Following Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation

Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been systematically looked at in patients undergoing transvenous AF. This study involved 11 patients, the mean age 60 ± 8 years. 3 male and 8 female, in whom transvenous atrial defibrillation successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. Eight patients had paroxysmal AF and three patients had chronic persistent AF for 4 weeks or more. Four patients were taking antiarrhythmic medications at the time of testing. Multipolar transvenous catheters were positioned inside the coronary sinus, right atrium, and the right ventricle. Atrial defibrillation testing was performed using the METRIX atrial defibrillation system in nine patients and the Ventritex HVSO2 in the remaining two patients. A total of 64 therapeutic shocks (range 3–11) were delivered in the 11 patients, and 31 of these successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. In four patients spontaneous AF was reinitiated following 12 successful transvenous atrial defibrillation episodes. The mean time to reinitiation of AF following shock delivery and restoration of sinus rhythm was 8.26 ± 5.25 seconds, range 1.8–19.9 seconds. All 12 episodes of spontaneous AF were preceded by a spontaneous premature atrial complex. The coupling interval of the premature atrial complexes was 443 ± 43 ms, range 390–510 ms. None of the patients taking antiarrhythmic medications or those demonstrating no premature atrial complexes had spontaneous reinitiation of AF. In conclusion, spontaneous reinitiation of AF can occur in a significant proportion of patients with AE undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation. This phenomenon is preceded by the occurrence of atrial premature complex. Findings of this study may have significant clinical implications.(PACE 1998; 21:1105–1110)     

Effects on Cardiac Performance of Atrioventricular Node Catheter Ablation Using Radiofrequency Current for Drug-Refractory Atrial Arrhythmias

Patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF) are candidates for radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node with the aim being to control heart rate. As patients wilh AF can have markedly impaired ventricular function, information concerning the hemodynamic effects of AV node ablation using RF current would be valuable. Fourteen consecutive patients (mean age 65 ± 3 years) with drug-resistant AF underwent AV node catheter ablation with RF current and had permanent pacemaker implantation. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (FFJ by two-dimensional echoeardiography immediately before ablation was 42 ± 3% (range 14%–54%) and their mean exercise time was 4.4 ± 0.4 minutes. Complete AV block was achieved in all 14 patients with 6 ± 2 RF applications (range 1–18). There was no evidence of any acute cardiodepressant effect associated with delivery of RF current, and EF 3 days after ablation was 44 ± 4%. By 6 weeks after ablation, the left ventricular EF was significantly improved compared to baseline (47 ± 4% postablation vs 42 ± 3% preahlation; P < 0.05), and this modest increase in EF was accompanied by an improvement in exercise time (5.4 ± 0.4 min). In conclusion, delivery of RF current for AV node catheter ablation in patients with AF and reduced ventricular function is not associated with any acute cardiodepressant effect. On the contrary, improved control of rapid heart rate following successful AV node ablation is associated with a modest and progressive improvement in cardiac performance.