Beyond Doublet Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Combination of Targeted Agents with First-Line Chemotherapy

The first-line treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved significantly over the past 5 years. As recently as 15 years ago, best supportive care (BSC) was considered an acceptable option for most patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, based on the concern that toxic effects of systemic chemotherapy overshadowed any potential benefits. The enhanced efficacy of platinum-based doublet chemotherapeutic regimens led to increases in overall patient survival relative to BSC. However, overall survival (OS) appeared to plateau, even with the introduction and refinement of these regimens. The addition of novel targeted agents targeting growth pathways to platinum-based regimens failed to overcome the 7.8- to 10.5-month survival barrier. After many phase III clinical trials, which involved tyrosine kinase inhibitors, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, protein kinase C inhibitors, and retinoids, this survival barrier had yet to be surmounted, although in some cases certain subgroups benefited, suggesting specific molecular correlations. Recently, inhibition of components of the angiogenesis pathway with the addition of bevacizumab to a platinum-based doublet led to statistically significant increases in OS, progression-free survival, and response rate relative to chemotherapy alone. This advance pushed the median survival of selected patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who met the eligibility criteria of the trial over the 12-month mark, thus offering patients and clinicians hope for more incremental advances in the future.     

Efficacy and Safety Results From a Phase II,Placebo-Controlled Study of Onartuzumab Plus First-Line Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

The treatment options for squamous cell non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of onartuzumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in previously untreated advanced squamous cell NSCLC.

Real-World Efficacy of First-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Tumor Expression

BackgroundIn clinical trials, first-line treatment with pembrolizumab improved overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of ≥ 50%. However, data on the efficacy of this treatment between clinical trials and actual clinical practice are inconsistent.Patients and MethodsNinety-five patients with histologically diagnosed advanced or recurrent NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥ 50% who received pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were consecutively enrolled onto this multicenter retrospective study from February 2017 to December 2018. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. We assessed the objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and immune-related adverse events (irAE), and determined their associations with clinical characteristics.ResultsThe objective response rate was 40.0%. The median PFS was 6.1 months, and OS did not reach the median. Multivariate analyses revealed that nonadenocarcinoma histology (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.03; P = .015) and ≥ 3 metastatic sites (hazard ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-8.01; P < .001) were independently correlated with poor PFS. Patients with irAE and patients without interstitial lung disease had significantly longer PFS (14.0 and 4.9 months, respectively; P = .011) than patients without irAE or patients with interstitial lung disease.ConclusionThe outcome of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab treatment was worse in those with nonadenocarcinoma and with a large number of metastatic sites. Patients with irAE and without interstitial lung disease had a more favorable outcome.     

Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Treated Beyond Progression

IntroductionTreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond progression is associated with improved survival in patients with melanoma and clear-cell renal carcinoma. Whether this association exists for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently still unclear.Patients and MethodsWe performed a multi-institutional retrospective study based on landmark and multivariable analyses to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with nivolumab beyond Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 progression in patients with advanced NSCLC. Criteria for receiving nivolumab beyond progression were investigator-assessed clinical benefit, stable performance status, tolerance of treatment, and no need of immediate intervention to prevent serious complication of progression.ResultsOf 176 patients progressed to nivolumab according to RECIST v1.1, 60 (34.1%) were treated beyond progression (TBP) and 116 (65.9%) were not-TBP (NTBP). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the TBP group compared with the NTBP group (17.8 vs. 3.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.46; P < .0001). In a landmark analysis of evaluable patients beginning 6 weeks from first progression, the median overall survival for patients TBP was 10.7 months and for those NTBP, 3.4 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.77; P = .002). Discontinuation of nivolumab at first progression was associated with shorter survival in multivariable analysis (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.95-4.54; P < .001). No safety concerns emerged in patients who were in the TBP group.ConclusionA subset of patients with NSCLC and progressive disease may continue to benefit from nivolumab beyond progression. Discontinuation of immunotherapy based only on RECIST v1.1 may be premature.     

Postprogression Survival in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Receive Second-Line or Third-Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundThe increased availability of active agents has improved overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously showed that postprogression survival (PPS) is highly associated with OS in the first-line setting, but little is known about PPS in the salvage setting. In this study, we analyzed PPS in phase III trials in the second-line or third-line setting.Patients and MethodsA literature search identified 18 trials for previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC. We partitioned OS into progression-free survival (PFS) and PPS and evaluated the association between OS and either PFS or PPS. Correlation analysis to examine whether a treatment benefit for PFS carried over to OS was performed by calculation of incremental gains in OS and PFS at the trial level.ResultsThe average median PPS was longer than the average median PFS (5.4 and 2.6 months, respectively). The induction rate for subsequent chemotherapy after second-line or third-line treatment was related to the duration of PPS in linear regression analysis (r² = 0.4813). Median OS was highly associated with median PPS but not with PFS (r = 0.94 and 0.51, respectively), and only a weak association between the treatment benefits for PFS and OS was detected (r = 0.29).ConclusionsTreatment benefit for OS in patients with advanced NSCLC can be skewed by the effects of subsequent therapies in the second-line or third-line setting. Whether PFS or OS is the more appropriate endpoint for trials in the salvage setting should be considered.     

Potential Benefits of Bevacizumab Combined With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation

BackgroundOncogenic EGFR signaling has been shown to upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression involved in tumor angiogenesis. However, the clinical benefits of bevacizumab plus cytotoxic chemotherapy for EGFR mutation–positive patients remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate VEGFA messenger RNA expression in patients with EGFR mutation, and to further compare the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients.Patients and MethodsGene expression of various proangiogenic factors was analyzed in nonsquamous, non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Additionally, clinical data of patients receiving carboplatin and pemetrexed (CPem; n = 104) or bevacizumab plus CPem (BevCPem; n = 55) at Nagoya University hospital were retrospectively assessed for progression-free survival and best overall response rate (ORR).ResultsAmong various proangiogenic factors, only VEGFA expression was significantly higher in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR mutation compared to wild-type patients (P = .0476). Progression-free survival in the BevCPem group was significantly longer in patients with EGFR mutation than in wild-type patients (10.5 vs. 6.6 months; Wilcoxon P = .0278), while the difference in the CPem group was not significant (6.6 vs. 4.5 months; Wilcoxon P = .1822). The ORRs in the BevCPem group were 54.5% and 36.4% for EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients, respectively, and the ORRs in the CPem group were 35.5% and 28.8 % in EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients, respectively.ConclusionVEGFA messenger RNA expression was significantly increased in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation, and BevCPem provided better clinical benefits to patients with EGFR mutation than wild-type carriers.     

Efficacy and Safety of BRAF Inhibitors With or Without MEK Inhibitors in BRAF-Mutant Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From a Real-Life Cohort

BackgroundReal-life comparative data on BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and BRAFi + MEK inhibitors (MEKi) combination in BRAF-mutant (BRAFm) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lacking.Patients and MethodsConsecutive BRAFm advanced NSCLC patients (n = 58) treated in 9 Israeli centers in 2009-2018 were identified. These were divided according to mutation subtype and treatment into groups A1 (V600E, BRAFi; n = 5), A2 (V600E, BRAFi + MEKi; n = 15), A3 (V600E, no BRAFi; n = 7), B1 (non-V600E, BRAFi ± MEKi; n = 7), and B2 (non-V600E, no BRAFi; n = 23); one patient received both BRAFi and BRAFi + MEKi. Safety, objective response rate, progression-free survival with BRAFi ± MEKi, and overall survival were assessed.ResultsObjective response rate was 40%, 67%, and 33% in groups A1, A2, and B1, respectively (P = .5 for comparison between groups A1 and A2). In group B1, G469A and L597R mutations were associated with response to BRAFi + MEKi. Median progression-free survival was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-5.3), 5.5 months (95% CI, 0.7-9.3), and 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.5-6.7) for groups A1, A2, and B1, respectively (log-rank for comparison between groups A1 and A2, P = .04). Median overall survival with BRAFi ± MEKi was 1.7 months (95% CI, 0.5-NR), 9.5 months (95% CI, 0.2-14.9), and 7.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-NR) in groups A1, A2, and B1, respectively (log-rank for comparison between groups A1 and A2, P = .6). Safety profiles differed slightly, and similar treatment discontinuation rates were observed with BRAFi and BRAFi + MEKi.ConclusionIn the real-life setting, activity and safety of BRAFi + MEKi in V600E BRAFm NSCLC are comparable to those observed in prospective clinical trials; the combination of BRAFi + MEKi is superior to monotherapy with a BRAFi. Further research should be done to explore the impact of BRAFi + MEKi treatment on the natural history of BRAFm NSCLC.     

Phase 2 Study of Nimotuzumab in Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundWe evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of nimotuzumab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.Patients and MethodsIn this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted in Japan (JapicCTI-090825), patients received thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction, 6 weeks) and four 4-week cycles of chemotherapy (day 1, cisplatin 80 mg/m²; days 1 and 8, vinorelbine 20 mg/m²). Nimotuzumab 200 mg was administrated weekly for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment completion rate, defined as the percentage of patients completing 60 Gy of radiotherapy within 8 weeks, 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and at least 75% of the required nimotuzumab dose during the initial 2-cycle concurrent chemoradiotherapy period.ResultsOf 40 patients enrolled, 39 received the study treatment, which was well tolerated, with a completion rate of 87.2%. Thirty-eight patients completed 60 Gy of radiotherapy within 8 weeks. Infusion reaction, grade 3 or higher rash, grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis, or grade 4 or higher nonhematologic toxicity were not observed. The objective response rate was 69.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-year PFS rate were 508 days and 29.0%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate in patients with non–squamous cell carcinoma (n = 23) was 13.7% and in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16) was 50.0%. The 5-year overall survival rate was 58.4%.ConclusionAddition of nimotuzumab to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed potential for treating patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma.     

A Randomized Phase II Study of Pemetrexed in Combination With Cisplatin or Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundPemetrexed plus cisplatin was approved for first-line treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with nonsquamous histology after initiation of this study. This phase II study evaluated pemetrexed plus cisplatin and pemetrexed plus carboplatin as first-line treatments for stage IIIB/IV NSCLC.Patients and MethodsThe patients were randomized (1:1) to 2 parallel arms: pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m²) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (area under the curve 6) day 1 every 3 weeks (maximum, 6 cycles). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary objective; secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), 1-year survival, and safety.ResultsSixty-five patients were randomized to each treatment arm. The patients treated with pemetrexed plus cisplatin had a median age of 64 years and were predominantly men (42 [64.6%]) with nonsquamous histology (53 [81.5%]), stage IV (61 [92.4%]) disease, and a performance status of 0 (40 [61.5%]). Median PFS was 6.0 months, 6-month PFS rate was 50.5%, median OS was 11.7 months, and 1-year survival rate was 47.5%. Drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (11 [16.9%]), anemia (5 [7.7%]), thrombocytopenia (2 [3.1%]), and nausea (3 [4.6%]). Patients treated with pemetrexed plus carboplatin had a median age of 63 years, were predominantly men (46 [70.8%]) with nonsquamous histology (52 [80.0%]), stage IV (58 [86.6%]) disease, and a performance status of 0 (45 [69.2%]). The median PFS was 4.7 months, the 6-month PFS rate was 34.9%, median OS was 8.9 months, and 1-year survival rate was 39.2%. Drug-related grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (17 [26.2%]), thrombocytopenia (11 [16.9%]), anemia (7 [10.8%]), and nausea (5 [7.7%]).ConclusionsBoth the pemetrexed plus cisplatin and pemetrexed plus carboplatin arms met their primary endpoints and demonstrated efficacy and tolerability as first-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. http://ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00402051.     

Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

Systemic chemotherapy provides improvement in both survival and quality of life for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Elderly patients have more comorbidities and tend to tolerate more poorly aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy than younger individuals. Our purpose in this article is to summarize recent studies of single-agent chemotherapy and combination regimens with cytotoxic or targeted therapies in the management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. We have reviewed the available evidence in the literature to gauge the results of therapy for elderly patients with lung cancer. We found that single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for nonselected elderly patients. Retrospective analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with increased but acceptable toxicity for elderly patients. Therefore, the outcomes in the fit elderly mirror results observed in younger patients, although toxicity is generally greater.     

Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants are Associated With Chemotherapy Response and Prognosis in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to explore the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genetic polymorphisms and platinum-based chemotherapy response as well as the prognosis of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a Chinese cohort.Patients and MethodsSeven hundred fifty-five patients with advanced NSCLC (stage III [A + B] or stage IV) were enrolled. Platinum-based chemotherapy was given to each patient with NSCLC, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated. The VDR polymorphisms were genotyped.ResultsThree hundred twenty-one (42.5%) patients responded to chemotherapy (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) and 434 (57.5%) patients were nonresponders (stable disease [SD] or progressive disease [PD]). The genotypic and allelic frequencies of FokI, BsmI, and TaqI were not significantly different between chemotherapy responders and nonresponders. However, the genotypic and allelic frequencies of ApaI thymine (T) > guanine (G) were significantly different between the responders and nonresponders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GG genotype carriers of ApaI T > G had a higher chance of being responders. The ApaI T > G polymorphisms affected mean overall survival (OS). The GG genotype carriers of ApaI polymorphisms had a longer mean OS compared with TT carriers. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that ApaI T > G was significantly associated with OS.ConclusionWe found that there was an effect of ApaI T > G polymorphisms of the VDR gene on the chemotherapy response in patients with NSCLC, as well as a prognostic role of the VDR gene polymorphisms in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Use of Cetuximab After Failure of Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundGefitinib and cetuximab are both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) target therapies used to treat patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different mechanisms. To clarify the effectiveness of cetuximab after failure of gefitinib treatment, we investigated the clinical features of patients with NSCLC who received cetuximab-containing chemotherapy after failure of gefitinib.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed the clinical data and mutational studies of patients with NSCLC in the National Taiwan University Hospital who had received gefitinib and, after failure of gefitinib, cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.ResultsFifteen patients who received cetuximab-containing chemotherapy after failure of gefitinib were identified. Four were responders to gefitinib therapy, and 3 were responders to cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Ten were sequenced for EGFR and KRAS mutations. Six of the 10 patients had EGFR mutations, and all 10 patients had wild-type (WT) KRAS. In the 4 patients who had the gefitinib-resistant EGFR T790M mutation, 2 were responders to cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. The other cetuximab responder had WT EGFR.ConclusionCetuximab might add benefit in treatment after failure of gefitinib, regardless of EGFR mutational status. Treatment with cetuximab should be further explored, even in patients who have previously received gefitinib treatment.     

Subsequent Chemotherapy Improves Survival Outcome in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Acquired Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide promising effect against non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although most tumors acquire resistance. Our objective was to assess the survival outcome of patients with NSCLC with or without subsequent chemotherapy after acquired TKI resistance.Patients and MethodsA total of 114 patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who had had disease control with TKIs were retrospectively reviewed. After acquired TKI resistance, patients received either best supportive care (BSC) only or BSC plus subsequent chemotherapy. Both groups were well balanced in regard to performance status, age, sex, histology subtype, and smoking status.ResultsSixty-seven patients (58.8%) received subsequent chemotherapy, and 47 patients (41.2%) received BSC only. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the time of TKI resistance in the subsequent-chemotherapy group (11.2 months and 3.5 months, respectively) were longer than those of the BSC group (3.8 months and 1.5 months, respectively; P < .01). Patients who subsequently received taxane-based chemotherapy exhibited higher a response rate and disease control rate (48.7% and 79.5%, respectively) than patients treated with a nontaxane regimen (21.4% and 53.5%, respectively; P < .05). Overall survival and PFS in patients after taxane-based subsequent chemotherapy (12.7 months and 5.1 months, respectively) were longer than those of patients given a nontaxane regimen (7 months and 1.8 months, respectively; P < .01).ConclusionThis study suggests that acquired TKI resistance should be managed aggressively. The higher antitumor response and survival outcome with a taxane-based regimen in this retrospective study could encourage further prospective investigation to confirm the efficacy of taxane over nontaxane chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC whose disease progresses with EGFR TKI treatment.     

Association of Extended Dosing Intervals or Delays in Pembrolizumab-based Regimens With Survival Outcomes in Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundBesides modeling/simulation-based analysis, no post-approval studies have evaluated the optimal administration frequency of pembrolizumab in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate the association between survival outcomes and treatment extensions/delays of pembrolizumab-based regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC. Those who had received at least 4 cycles in routine practice were divided into 2 groups: nonstandard (Non-Std, ≥ 2 cycles at intervals > 3 weeks + 3 days) and standard (Std, all cycles every 3 weeks or 1 cycle > 3 weeks + 3 days).ResultsAmong 150 patients, 92 (61%) were eligible for the study (Non-Std, 27; Std, 65). The reasons for patients with extensions/delays in the Non-Std group included: immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (33%), non–irAE-related medical issues (26%), and patient-physician preference (41%). The Non-Std group was more likely to have a higher programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score, a higher number of treatment cycles, and pembrolizumab monotherapy. Univariate and 6-month landmark analyses showed longer median overall survival and progression-free survival in the Non-Std group compared with the Std group. After multivariable adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-4.8; P = .824) or progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-9.6; P = .157) between the 2 groups.ConclusionOur study shows that a significant proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC receive pembrolizumab-based regimens with extended intervals or delays in routine clinical practice and with similar outcomes to those receiving treatment at label-specified 3-week intervals. Given the durability of benefit seen and the potential for cost reduction and decreased infusion frequency in these patients, this requires validation in prospective trials.     

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Docetaxel-Cisplatin in Patients With Stage III N2 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionTo assess the efficacy and potential prognostic factors of patients with stage III N2 non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin (DP) chemotherapy followed by surgical resection.MethodsSixty-two patients with NSCLC treated with DP as neoadjuvant chemotherapy between November 2003 and December 2009 were identified and reviewed in this study. Tumor response, survival, and clinicopathologic data were collected retrospectively. The time to event was analyzed by fitting Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsFifty-eight (94%) of 62 patients eventually underwent surgical resection after DP. The overall clinical response rate to induction DP chemotherapy was 42%. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histology were more likely to response to the DP regimen than those with adenocarcinoma histology (68% vs. 33%, P = .006). With a median follow-up of 82.4 months among the 58 patients, there were 41 (71%) tumor relapses and 27 (47%) deaths. The median event-free survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 22.3-32.7 months), and the median overall survival was 66.7 months (95% CI, 35.1-98.3 months). In multivariate analysis, when fitting the Cox proportional hazards model, SCC histology (hazard ratio [HR] 0.234 [95% CI, 0.098-0.560]; P = .001) and mediastinal downstaging to N0 (HR 0.451 [95% CI, 0.226-0.898]; P = .024) were independent predictors of better event-free survival.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with the DP regimen is both active and well tolerated in patients with stage III N2 NSCLC. SCC histology predicted a better treatment response and survival outcome than adenocarcinoma histology in this patient group. Further investigation of combined-modality treatment is warranted to improve survival in the adenocarcinoma subset of stage III N2 NSCLC.