The Importance of Preoperative Breast MRI for Patients Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer

Abstract:  The use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer has been criticized for increasing the number of therapeutic mastectomies performed, as well as increasing the cost of treatment. The purpose of this report is to examine one surgeon's practice and to describe the MRI findings for patients with breast cancer to determine if those findings changed the therapeutic options for those patients in. Data were collected prospectively between August 2003 and January 2006 for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Diagnoses were made by core biopsy or fine-needle aspiration; all lesions were intact at the time of MRI. Twenty-five percent of patients were found to have previously occult, but suspicious lesions on MRI that required additional diagnostic evaluation, including ultrasound, core biopsy, excisional biopsy, or any combination; for approximately half of these patients a separate cancer was confirmed. For most of these patients, the new lesion was ipsilateral and multicentric, and most required mastectomy. For the remaining 75% of patients, MRI confirmed the index lesion was the only area of concern, and appropriate surgical treatment was completed. Preoperative bMRI for patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer identified previously occult and separate tumors in 13% of patients, resulting in surgical treatment change for many.     

Variability of Preoperative Breast MRI Utilization among Older Women with Newly Diagnosed Early‐stage Breast Cancer

While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used following breast cancer diagnosis, routine use of breast MRI for preoperative evaluation remains contentious. We identified factors associated with preoperative breast MRI utilization and investigated the variation among physicians. We used the surveillance, epidemiology, and end Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked database to analyze the preoperative breast MRI utilization among patients with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2007. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to identify patient‐ and physician‐level predictors of preoperative MRI utilization. Of 56,743 women with early‐stage breast cancer who were treated with surgery and evaluated by a preoperative mammogram and/or ultrasound during the study period, 8.7% (n = 4,913) received preoperative breast MRI. While patient and tumor characteristics did predict preoperative breast MRI utilization, they explained only 15.4% of the variation in utilization rates. Differences in preoperative breast MRI utilization across physicians were large, after controlling patient‐level factors and physicians' volumes. Accounting for clustering of patients within individual physicians (n = 3,144), the multilevel logistic regression models explained 36.4% of variation. The median odds ratio of 3.2, corresponding with the median value of the relative odds of receiving preoperative breast MRI between two randomly chosen physicians, indicated a large individual physician effect. Our study found that preoperative breast MRI has been adopted rapidly and variably. Although patient characteristics were associated with preoperative breast MRI utilization, physician practice was a major determinant of whether women received preoperative breast MRI. Future studies should evaluate whether routine use of preoperative breast MRI in newly diagnosed early‐stage breast cancer improves clinical outcomes.     

Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer are Not at Higher Risk for Contralateral Synchronous Breast Cancer

Abstract: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide a more accurate assessment of synchronous contralateral breast cancer in select cohorts of patients. The utility of this imaging technique for detecting synchronous contralateral breast cancers in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) has not previously been described. We report our experience in assessing contralateral disease in a cohort of women with LABC who had clinical assessment, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI prior to neo‐adjuvant therapy. Patients, who presented with LABC, stage IIB (T3N0), stage III A/B, were identified from a prospectively kept data base at a single tertiary care centre between November 2001 and August 2005. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and demographic, imaging and pathologic variables were abstracted. One hundred and one female patients with LABC were identified (median age 49). One hundred of 101 patients presented with a clinically obvious LABC. Three patients had LABC that was not visualized mammographically but was detected on ultrasound and MRI. Seventeen of 101 patients (17%) had contralateral imaging findings that required biopsy for diagnosis. Of the contralateral biopsies, 41% (7/17) were malignant. These malignant lesions were identified clinically in 4/7 patients, on 7/7 ultrasounds, 7/7 mammograms, and 5/5 MRI. Overall, 7% (7/101) patients had malignant synchronous contralateral disease. In our LABC patient cohort, 7% of patients presented with malignant contralateral disease. The incidence of contralateral disease in women with LABC is comparable with patients who present with early stage breast cancer. No single screening technique, ultrasound, mammogram or MRI, appeared to be superior for identifying contralateral synchronous malignancy.     

Detected, yet not Diagnosed - Breast Cancer Screening with MRI Mammography in High-Risk Women

BACKGROUND: MRI has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive imaging method for detecting breast cancer in women at high risk, allowing depiction of cancers that are occult on mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. This high sensitivity is tempered by imperfect specificity due to overlap in the features of benign and malignant lesions. CASE: We present the case of a young BRCA2 mutation carrier whose breast cancer could have been diagnosed 2 years earlier; this is a rare case of a false-negative finding in MRI. DISCUSSION: We discuss morphological, physiological and psychological reasons for underestimation of MRI sets, especially in young women. CONCLUSION: We conclude that double reading in MR screening for breast cancer in high-risk women, as conducted for mammography screening, could be considered.     

MRI Screening in a Clinic Population with a Family History of Breast Cancer

Background Breast MRI is increasingly being used in patients at increased risk for breast cancer; however, guidelines for MRI screening are inadequately defined. We describe our experience with MRI screening in a large population of women with a family history of breast cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the Memorial Sloan–Kettering breast cancer surveillance program prospective database from April 1999 to July 2006. Patients with a family history of breast cancer and at least 1 year follow-up were identified. All patients were offered biannual clinical breast examination (CBE) and annual mammography (MMG). MRI screening was performed at the discretion of the physician and patient. Results Family history profiles revealed 1,019 eligible patients; median follow-up was 5.0 years. MRI screening was performed in 374 (37%) patients resulting in a total of 976 MRIs during the study period. Cancer was detected in 9/374 patients (2%) undergoing MRI screening. Seven cancers were detected by MRI only, for a cancer detection rate of 0.7% (7/976) for screening MRI. When stratified by family risk profile, the positive predictive value (PPV) of MRI was higher (13%) in those patients with the strongest family histories and lower (6%) in patients with less significant family histories. Conclusions MRI screening can be a useful adjunct to CBE and MMG in patients with high-risk family histories of breast cancer, yet it has low yield in patients with lower-risk family histories. These data suggest that MRI screening should be reserved for those at highest risk. Patrick I. Borgen is currently affiliated with Maimonides Cancer Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.     

The Utility of Breast MRI in the Management of Breast Cancer

Abstract: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in the evaluation of breast cancer. The impact of this modality on patient management at a single institution is evaluated in this paper. A retrospective review was performed for 114 breast cancer patients who had breast MRI as part of their diagnostic evaluation. Clinical information, mammograms, breast ultrasounds and MRI scans were reviewed to determine whether the MRI findings led to a change in patient management. Outcomes as the result of breast MRI were stratified as favorable and unfavorable. Ninety‐five patients who had complete clinical, radiologic, and pathologic data were identified. The indications for breast MRI included: high risk screening (n = 3), diagnostic evaluation of disease after neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24) or prior to re‐excision (n = 8), extent of in situ ductal, infiltrating ductal or infiltrating lobular disease histology (DCIS n = 3, IDC n = 24, ILC n = 17), identification of unknown primary (n = 2), assessment of contralateral breast (n = 4), recurrence surveillance (n = 5), and other (n = 5). MRI was concordant with clinical findings and other modalities in 70.5% of cases. MRI altered planned clinical management in 28 of 95 patients (29.5%). Management changes were favorable in 21 patients (75%). Diagnostic evaluation of the breast by MRI alters patient management in 30% of cases depending upon the indications. Alteration in patient management is favorable in 75% of cases. Evaluation of the breast by MRI alters the clinical management of nearly one‐third of patients. Changes are favorable for the majority of these cases. Patients undergoing evaluation for contralateral disease, invasive lobular carcinoma and assessment of chemotherapeutic response may derive a more meaningful benefit from MRI.     

Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging Recommendations and Outcomes in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening recommendations and the subsequent outcomes in women with increased risk for breast cancer evaluated by oncology subspecialists at an academic center. Patients evaluated between 1/1/2007 and 3/1/2011 under diagnosis codes for family history of breast or ovarian cancer, genetic syndromes, lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia were included. Patients with a history of breast cancer were excluded. Retrospective review of prospectively acquired demographics, lifetime risk of breast cancer, and screening recommendations were obtained from the medical record. Retrospective review of the results of prospectively interpreted breast imaging examinations and image‐guided biopsies were analyzed. 282 women were included. The majority of patients were premenopausal with a median age of 43. Most (69%) were referred due to a family history of breast or ovarian cancers. MRI was recommended for 84% of patients based on a documented lifetime risk >20%. Most women referred for MRI screening (88%) were compliant with this recommendation. A total of 299 breast MRI examinations were performed in 146 patients. Biopsy was performed for 32 (11%) exams and 10 cancers were detected for a positive predictive value (PPV) of 31% (based on biopsy performed) and an overall per exam cancer yield of 3.3%. Three cancers were detected in patients who did not undergo screening MRI. The 13 cancers were Stage 0–II; all patients were without evidence of disease with a median follow‐up of 22 months. In a cohort of women seen by breast subspecialty providers, screening breast MRI was recommended according to guidelines, and used primarily in premenopausal women with a family history or genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Adherence to MRI screening recommendations was high and cancer yield from breast MRI was similar to that in clinical trials.     

The Role of Smoking in Breast Cancer Development: An Analysis of a Mayo Clinic Cohort

Abstract:  The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of smoking history on breast cancer diagnosis in a referral clinic population. We conducted a case–control study using clinical data collected on 8,097 female patients (1,225 breast cancer cases and 6,872 controls) seen in the Mayo Clinic Breast Clinic between August 1, 1993 and November 31, 2003. Breast cancer patients and noncancer patients significantly differed with respect to age at time of the index visit (p < 0.001), number of pregnancies (p = 0.006), number of live births (p = 0.002), vital status at last known follow-up (p < 0.001), current menstruation (p < 0.001), age at menopause (p < 0.001), history of hysterectomy (p < 0.001), use of oral contraception (p = 0.05), duration of oral contraception use (p = 0.001), use of other exogenous hormones (p < 0.001), duration of exogenous hormone use (p = 0.05), breast pain at time of index visit (p = 0.002), smoking status (p < 0.001), and use of five or more alcoholic beverages per week (p = 0.002). After adjustment for these baseline characteristics, having a personal history of smoking was found to be predictive of breast cancer diagnosis (odds ratios [OR] = 1.25, p = 0.004). Other positive predictors for breast cancer diagnosis were: age (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), history of hysterectomy (OR = 0.66, p < 0.001), prior use of oral contraception for more than 11 years (OR = 2.10, p < 0.001), and prior use of other exogenous hormones/estrogen (OR = 1.81, p < 0.001). In this referral practice having a personal history of smoking is predictive of breast cancer diagnosis. Further studies are needed to further explore this relationship.     

Axillary Ultrasound in the Management of the Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patient

Axillary lymph node status remains an important prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer. Axillary ultrasound (AUS) is an important tool in the workup of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and also has an emerging role evaluating the axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This review discusses the value of AUS in the workup and management of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and describes its role given the recent changes in axillary management.     

Multicentric and Contralateral Invasive Tumors Identified with Pre-op MRI in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Abstract: Preoperative breast MRI in newly diagnosed cancer patients has several potential benefits. Improved survival for patients with invasive disease as the index lesion is unlikely to be one of these benefits, given what is known from variations in locoregional management in the historic conservation trials. However, this may not be the case for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), as the discovery of unsuspected invasive cancer located elsewhere from the biopsy‐proven DCIS could result in decreased survival if left undetected and untreated. In support of this hypothesis, a previous observational study of a large cohort of DCIS patients revealed the development of invasive cancer to be the most common event after unilateral DCIS treatment, occurring in 3.9%, mostly in the opposite breast. These cancers appeared on mammography or clinical exam within a short time frame (median 2.9 years) and were associated with a diminution in survival. Given these second events occurring so soon after DCIS treatment, it must be considered that invasive cancers were present elsewhere, but mammographically occult, at the time of DCIS diagnosis. To examine this possibility, 288 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed DCIS underwent preoperative MRI, with the discovery of separate foci of invasive cancer, either multicentric or contralateral, occurring in 3.5% of patients, a similar incidence to the short‐term observational study. These “elsewhere” invasive cancers are presented here with details of pathology such that both Stage I and Stage II disease can be seen as clinically significant, with the usual stage‐based survival implications.     

Utility of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Occult Primary Breast Cancer

Background Although carcinoma presenting as axillary metastases is assumed to be due to breast cancer, identification of the primary lesion may prove problematic. We investigated the ability of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify the primary tumor, thereby confirming the diagnosis and broadening treatment options. Methods From 1995 to 2001, 69 patients at our institution presented with occult primary breast cancer. All patients had negative breast examinations and mammograms and underwent breast MRI. Results Of 69 patients, 55 had axillary adenopathy without evidence of distant disease (stage II); 14 had stage IV disease. In patients with stage II disease, MRI revealed suspicious lesions in 76% (42 of 55). In 62% (26 of 42), the MRI finding proved to be the occult primary tumor. Of these, 58% (15 of 26) were candidates for breast conservation. MRI did not identify the primary tumor in 25 women; 12 underwent mastectomy. Cancer was found in 33% (4 of 12) of these. Thirteen patients were treated with primary breast irradiation; three were lost to follow-up, one developed distant disease, and nine were without evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. In women with stage IV disease, MRI identified the primary tumor in 5 of 9 patients with regional adenopathy and 2 of 5 patients with distant disease (overall 50%; 7 of 14). MRI identified the primary tumor in women with both mammographically dense (19 of 44; 43%) and less dense (10 of 20; 50%) breasts. Conclusions Breast MRI detects mammographically occult cancer in half of women with axillary metastases, regardless of breast density. MRI is a powerful tool for stage II and stage IV patients with occult primary breast cancer. Claire L. Buchanan, MD, is now at Swedish Cancer Institute, 500 17th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98108     

Prognostic Factors for Metachronous Contralateral Breast Cancer: Implications for Management of the Contralateral Breast

The absolute number of breast cancer survivors who are at risk for metachronous contralateral breast cancer (mCBC) has dramatically increased. The objectives of this study were to identify factors predictive of survival for patients with mCBC and to determine clinicopathological factors predictive of advanced mCBC. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data base, we identified women, ages 18–80, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1992 to 2010. We excluded patients with bilateral and stage IV primary breast cancer. Patients who developed mCBC ≥12 months from initial diagnosis were identified. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to determine survival of patients with mCBC. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine factors associated with advanced mCBC. We identified 6,673 patients who developed mCBC during our study period. The median interval between initial breast cancer and mCBC was 5 years. The strongest predictor of overall survival was the nodal status of the mCBC. Other significant prognostic factors included patient age; race; size, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, grade, and type of surgery of the initial breast cancer; grade of the mCBC; and use of radiation therapy for the mCBC. Overall, 25% of mCBCs were node positive. Younger age, black race, and characteristics of the initial breast cancer (increased size, invasive lobular histology, mastectomy treatment, and node‐positivity) were significantly associated with node‐positive mCBC (all p < 0.0.05). The most powerful predictor of survival for patients with mCBC is the nodal status of mCBC. Patients with advanced initial breast cancers are more likely to develop node‐positive mCBC. Adherence to current surveillance and adjuvant therapy guidelines may minimize the risk and mortality of mCBCs.     

Features of Occult Invasion in Biopsy‐Proven DCIS at Breast MRI

The purpose of this study is to determine if MRI BI‐RADS criteria or radiologist perception correlate with presence of invasive cancer after initial core biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Retrospective search spanning 2000–2007 identified all core‐biopsy diagnoses of pure DCIS that coincided with preoperative MRI. Two radiologists fellowship‐trained in breast imaging categorized lesions according to ACR MRI BI‐RADS lexicon and estimated likelihood of occult invasion. Semiquantitative signal enhancement ratio (SER) kinetic analysis was also performed. Results were compared with histopathology. 51 consecutive patients with primary core biopsy‐proven DCIS and concurrent MRI were identified. Of these, 13 patients (25%) had invasion at excision. Invasion correlated significantly with presence of a mass for both readers (p = 0.012 and 0.001), rapid initial enhancement for Reader 1 (p = 0.001), and washout kinetics for Reader 2 (p = 0.012). Significant correlation between washout and invasion was confirmed by SER (p = 0.006) when threshold percent enhancement was sufficiently high (130%), corresponding to rapidly enhancing portions of the lesion. Radiologist perception of occult invasion was strongly correlated with true presence of invasion. These results provide evidence that certain BI‐RADS MRI criteria, as well as radiologist perception, correlate with occult invasion after an initial core biopsy of DCIS.     

MRI Phenotype Is Associated With Response to Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Breast Cancer

Background: The preferred management for women with stage II or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathologic response to chemotherapy has been shown to be an excellent predictor of outcome. Surrogates that can predict pathologic response and outcome will fuel future changes in management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates that patients with LABC have distinct tumor patterns. We investigated whether or not these patterns predict response to therapy.Methods: Thirty-three women who received neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for 4 cycles and serial breast MRI scans before and after therapy were evaluated for this study. Response to therapy was measured by change in the longest diameter on the MRI.Results: Five distinct imaging patterns were identified: circumscribed mass, nodular tissue infiltration diffuse tissue infiltration, patchy enhancement, and septal spread. The likelihood of a partial or complete response as measured by change in longest diameter was 77%, 37.5%, 20%, and 25%, respectively.Conclusions: MRI affords three-dimensional characterization of tumors and has revealed distinct patterns of tumor presentation that predict response. A multisite trial is being planned to combine imaging and genetic information in an effort to better understand and predict response and, ultimately, to tailor therapy and direct the use of novel agents.     

Marital Status Predicts Change in Distress and Well‐being in Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer and Their Peer Counselors

Abstract: We conducted a nonrandomized study matching 42 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer (sojourners) with 39 trained breast cancer survivors (navigators) who provided one‐on‐one peer counseling for 3–6 months. Because little is known about how marital status might impact participants in such an intervention, we tested whether being married/partnered buffered navigators and sojourners from distress at baseline and over time. We examined baseline and slopes over time for change in depression and trauma symptoms, and emotional well‐being. We were particularly concerned that being matched with a newly diagnosed breast cancer patient might trigger a re‐experiencing of trauma symptoms for the navigator, so we examined a re‐experiencing subscale. All participants completed baseline, 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month assessments. Our hypotheses were tested in separate Analyses of Variance (married versus not) for the 39 sojourners and 34 navigators who provided baseline assessments, and the 29 sojourners and 24 navigators who were matched and provided at least one follow‐up. We found no significant baseline associations for navigators or sojourners. Being single/not married was associated with increasing depression symptoms over time in both navigators and sojourners compared with being married/partnered. By 12 months, these increases crossed above the clinical cut‐off for significant depression symptoms. Single status did not predict increasing trauma symptoms over time. However, being single/not married predicted a significant increase in navigators’ re‐experiencing of trauma symptoms. Over time, married sojourners increased significantly in emotional well‐being, whereas single/not married navigators did not differ from married navigators. In addition to providing ongoing training and emotional support to navigators, our findings indicate the importance of providing additional support for women who are not married or partnered.     

Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI Reveals the Extent and the Microvascular Pattern of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

To report the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing the extent of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To assess whether the microvascularity pattern in DCIS correlates with magnetic resonance enhancement. Eighty‐five histologically proven DCIS (77 pure DCIS, eight microinvasive DCIS) were prospectively studied with MRI. The morphology of magnetic resonance enhancement and the kinetic curve was recorded. Histopathologically, intraductal lesions were classified according to Van Nuys score. Tumor microvascularity was immunohistochemically assessed in a subset of 24 DCIS evaluating the number of microvessels, microvascularity area, and microvascularity pattern (diffuse or periductal). On the mammogram, 74% of DCIS appeared as microcalcifications. On MRI, 70% of DCIS showed enhancement. Non‐mass‐like uptake was observed in 78% of cases. The mean size of nonenhancing carcinomas was significantly lower than that of enhancing carcinomas (p = 0.033). The diffuse pattern was more frequent than the periductal pattern. A significant relationship between the morphology of MR enhancement and the microvascularity pattern was observed (p = 0.036); thus, 90% of DCIS showing segmental enhancement on MRI displayed a diffuse pattern while all DCIS with ductal enhancement showed a periductal pattern. There was a significant relationship between the maximum area of microvascularity and the vascular pattern (p = 0.015); periductal patterns showed larger areas than diffuse patterns. The lesion size was significantly larger as the Van Nuys score increased (p < 0.001) and was also related to the number of microvessels (p = 0.012). The mean area of microvascularity of DCIS was significantly larger as the Van Nuys score increased (p = 0.02). Breast MRI helps depict the extent of DCIS and reveals its microvascular pattern.