Long‐Term Outcome Following Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Originating From the Pulmonary Veins: Absence of Late Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation and Pulmonary Vein Tachycardia . Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the long‐term outcome and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients following catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia (AT) from the pulmonary veins (PV). Background: Although both AT and AF may originate from ectopic foci within PVs, it is unknown whether PV AT patients subsequently develop AF. Methods: Twenty‐eight patients with 29 PV ATs (14%) from a consecutive series of 194 patients who underwent RFA for focal AT were included. Patients with concomitant AF prior to the index procedure were excluded. Results: The minimum follow‐up duration was 4 years; mean age 38 ± 18 years with symptoms for 6.5 ± 10 years, having tried 1.5 ± 0.9 antiarrhythmic drugs. The distribution of foci was: left superior 12 (41%), right superior 10 (34%), left inferior 5 (17%), and right inferior 2 (7%). The focus was ostial in 93% and 2–4 cm distally within the vein in 7%. Mean tachycardia cycle length was 364 ± 90 ms. Focal ablation was performed in 25 of 28 patients. There were 6 recurrences with 5 from the original site. Twenty‐six patients were available for long‐term clinical follow‐up. At a mean of 7.2 ± 2.1 years, 25 of 26 (96%) were free from recurrence off antiarrhythmic drugs. No patients developed AF. Conclusions: Focal ablation for tachycardia originating from the PVs is associated with long‐term freedom from both AT and AF. Therefore, although PV AT and PV AF share a common anatomic distribution, PV AT is a distinct clinical entity successfully treated with focal RFA and not associated with AF in the long term. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 747‐750, July 2010)     

在心房颤动持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术的可行性

探讨在心房颤动 (简称房颤 )持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术的可行性。 9例在导管消融术中房颤持续发作的房颤患者 ,根据肺静脉环状标测电极导管记录的肺静脉激动特征采用 2种方法进行肺静脉开口部的消融 :①肺静脉激动有序且有一种或多种固定的激动顺序 ,采用射频导管消融环状电极记录的最早的激动部位 ;②肺静脉激动无序或无明确的激动顺序 ,首先使用超声球囊导管消融 ,如未达终点再加用射频导管消融。 2种方法的消融终点均为肺静脉电学隔离。总计对 31根肺静脉进行了消融 ,其中 2 8根在房颤心律下消融。房颤心律下电隔离肺静脉的成功率为 92 .9% (2 6根 )。总操作时间和X线透视时间分别为 1 38± 2 1min和 38± 9min。本组无肺静脉狭窄及其他并发症。随访 6 .3± 2 .9(3～ 1 1 )个月后 ,4例 (44.4% )患者无房颤发作 (无需药物 )。结论 :在房颤持续过程中行肺静脉电学隔离术方法可行 ,且较为安全 ;联用超声球囊消融和射频消融对于房颤发作过程中无序或无明确激动顺序的肺静脉具有较好的电学隔离效果。     

Investigation into Causes of Abnormal Cerebral MRI Findings Following PVAC Duty‐Cycled,Phased RF Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Asymptomatic Cerebral Lesions with Phased RF. Introduction: Left atrial catheter ablation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) is an established option for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Asymptomatic cerebral emboli (ACE) detected by diffusion weighted MRI (DW‐MRI) following AF ablation has been reported at varying rates. This variability may be linked to procedural variables and demographic risk factors. Animal studies with the multielectrode pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) have identified potential sources of emboli, including air introduced during PVAC introduction, inadequate anticoagulation, and high current densities when the distal (E1) and proximal (E10) electrodes are in contact. We sought to evaluate the incidence, size, and number of DW‐MRI findings with procedural modifications that potentially reduce the embolic load. Methods: Thirty‐seven AF patients (59 ± 10 years, 73% male, all with paroxysmal AF, left atrial [LA] diameter 44 ± 7 mm, left ventricular ejection fraction 57 ± 7%) underwent MRI sequences preceding ablation, within 24 hours postablation, and at 4–6 weeks. During the procedure all patients were on uninterrupted phenprocoumon, an attempted activated clotting time (ACT) level >300 seconds, had the PVAC introduced under saline, and antral ablation was started with a 2:1 bipolar/unipolar mode. Files from the ablation unit (GENius v14.4) were retrospectively analyzed to determine the relationship between E1 and E10 in close proximity and DW‐MRI findings. Results: Post procedure, 10/37 patients (27%) were positive for new DWI cerebral lesions. Nine of 10 patients had a single lesion, and 1/10 patient had 2 lesions. Average lesion size was 3.1 ± 3.9 mm (2–14 mm). One of 10 (10%) had lesions at MRI follow‐up. No neurological symptoms were observed. Eighteen of 37 (49%) of procedures had evidence of E1/E10 interaction. In the subgroup of patients with and without E1 and E10 in close proximity, the DW‐MRI rate was 8/18 (44%) and 2/19 (11%), respectively (P = 0.029). Conclusions: The source of positive DW‐MRI findings in LA ablation involves several factors. Controlling anticoagulation and careful sheath management helps to reduce the number and size of DW‐MRI lesions. With the PVAC catheter, an ablation with the E1 and E10 in close proximity increases the risk of a DW‐MRI finding. In the future, electrodes E1 and E10 should be kept apart to help reduce the incidence of acute ACE. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 121‐128, February 2013)     

Impact of Radiofrequency Characteristics on Acute Pulmonary Vein Reconnection and Clinical Outcome After PVAC Ablation

Impact of Radiofrequency Characteristics . Objective: The objective was to study the impact of radiofrequency (RF) characteristics on acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) and outcome after PVAC ablation. PVI with additional ablation of PVR (PVI + PVR) was compared to PVI‐only. Methods: In 40 consecutive patients, after PVAC‐guided PVI, adenosine and a 1‐hour waiting time were used to unmask and ablate acute PVR (PVI + PVR group). RF‐characteristics and 1‐year AF freedom were compared post hoc to 40 clinically matched patients undergoing PVI only (PVI‐only group). Custom‐made software was used to assess RF characteristics of the PVAC applications needed to obtain baseline PVI. Results: There was no difference in clinical characteristics or baseline RF‐profile between both groups. Acute PVR was observed and ablated in 38 of 160 veins (24%). AF‐freedom after PVI + PVR was higher than PVI (85% vs 65%, P < 0.05). Within the PVI group, comparing patients with and without AF‐recurrence, the percentage of PVAC applications with high T° (>48°) but low power (<3W) was higher (28 ± 18% vs 11 ± 11%, P < 0.0001). Within the PVI + PVR group, when comparing PVs with and without PVR, the percentage of low power/high T° PVAC applications was also higher (27 ± 13% vs 13 ± 15%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: (1) After PVAC ablation, 24% of PVs exhibit acute reconnection. Additional ablation of reconnection improves clinical outcome. (2) Acute reconnection as well as clinical recurrence of AF are characterized by PVAC ablation with a considerable number of applications with high temperature but low power. (3) If PV isolation is obtained with low power applications, a consistent use of both adenosine and waiting time is required. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 290‐296, March 2013)     

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Re‐Isolation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation . Aim: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence, necessitating repeat ablation procedures. The aim of this prospective randomized patient‐blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon (Cryo) versus radiofrequency (RF) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure. Methods: Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to Cryo or RF redo ablation. The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia, after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow‐up. All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm. Patients with an AF burden (AF%) ≤ 0.5% were considered AF‐free (Responders), while those with an AF% > 0.5% were classified as patients with AF recurrences (non‐Responders). Results: Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to Cryo (N = 40) or to RF (N = 40). Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs (1.9 ± 0.8 per patient) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs (1.7 ± 0.8 per patient) in RF Group (P = 0.62), all of which were targeted. In Cryo group, 68 (88%) of the 77 PVs were re‐isolated using only Cryo technique; the remaining 9 PVs were re‐isolated using RF. In RF group, all 72 PVs were successfully re‐isolated (P = 0.003 vs Cryo). By intention‐to‐treat, 23 (58%) RF patients were AF‐free vs 17 (43%) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year (P = 0.06). Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group; the RF group had no complications. Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation, 11 (38%) were AF‐free vs 20 (59%) of the 34 patients who had RF only (P = 0.021). Conclusion: When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF, RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 274‐279, March 2013)     

Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

Impact of a patent foramen ovale on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

Introduction: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is located at the anterior and superior part of the anatomical interatrial septum, the area that is targeted during transseptal puncture. This study sought to investigate the impact of accessing the left atrium via a PFO on paroxysmal AF ablation. Methods: From March 2004, 203 patients (55 ± 11 years) underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF (80 ± 71 months), with the endpoint being electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins (PV) and AF noninducibility. The presence of a PFO was determined by both transesophageal echocardiography and catheter probing. Procedural difficulty was evaluated by radiofrequency (RF), procedural, and fluoroscopic durations. Clinical follow‐up was also investigated. Results: A PFO was detected in 27 patients (13%) by transesophageal echocardiography and in 22 additional patients (total 49 patients, 24%), by catheter probing (P < 0.001). A PFO was associated with longer total RF applications (57 ± 19 vs 51 ± 18 min, P = 0.04) and RF applications to isolate the PVs (42 ± 16 vs 35 ± 12 min, P = 0.001). Procedural and fluoroscopic times were unaffected. Seventy‐three patients (36%) required a second procedure; there was no difference in the number of PV reconnections (1.3 vs 1.8 veins, P = NS). After a mean follow‐up of 19 ± 9 months, 194/203 patients (96%) were free of AF, with no difference in patients in whom a PFO had been used. Conclusion: Although isolation of PVs is longer, overall procedural duration and success is not affected when using a PFO compared with a transseptal puncture. The presence of a PFO is underestimated by transesophageal echocardiography with brachial injection when compared with catheter probing.     

Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results from Long‐Term Follow‐Up

Long‐Term Follow‐Up After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation . Introduction: Pulmonary veins play an important role in triggering atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for patients with paroxysmal AF. However, the late AF recurrence rate in long‐term follow‐up of circumferential PV antral isolation (PVAI) is not well documented. We sought to determine the time to recurrence of arrhythmia after PVAI, and long‐term rates of sinus rhythm after circumferential PVAI. Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with a mean age of 54 ± 10 years, with paroxysmal AF who underwent PVAI procedure were analyzed. Isolation of pulmonary veins was based on an electrophysiological and anatomical approach, with a nonfluoroscopic navigation mapping system to guide antral PVI. Ablation endpoint was vein isolation confirmed with a circular mapping catheter at first and subsequent procedures. Clinical, ECG, and Holter follow‐up was undertaken every 3 months in the first year postablation, every 6 months thereafter, with additional prolonged monitoring if symptoms were reported. Time to arrhythmia recurrence, and representing arrhythmias, were documented. Results: Isolation of all 4 veins was successful in 97% patients with 3.9 ± 0.3 veins isolated/patient. Follow‐up after the last RF procedure was at a mean of 39 ± 10 months (range 21–66 months). After a single procedure, sinus rhythm was maintained at long‐term follow‐up in 49% patients without use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). After repeat procedure, sinus rhythm was maintained in 57% patients without the use of AADs, and in 82% patients including patients with AADs. A total of 18 of 100 patients had 2 procedures and 4 of 100 patients had 3 procedures for recurrent AF/AT. Most (86%) AF/AT recurrences occurred ≤1 year after the first procedure. Mean time to recurrence was 6 ± 10 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis on antiarrhythmics showed AF free rate of 87% at 1 year and 80% at 4 years. There were no major complications. Conclusion: PVAI is an effective strategy for the prevention of AF in the majority of patients with PAF. Maintenance of SR requires repeat procedure or continuation of AADs in a significant proportion of patients. After maintenance of sinus rhythm 1‐year post‐PVAI, a minority of patients will subsequently develop late recurrence of AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 137‐141, February 2011)     

Pulmonary Vein Contraction Before and After Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary Vein Contraction After Ablation. Introduction: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) may provide a noninvasive method to test for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) by detecting changes in PV contraction. Methods: PV contraction (the maximal percentage change in PV cross‐sectional area [CSA] during the cardiac cycle) measured 1 month before and 2 months after PV isolation was compared in 63 PVs from 16 patients with medically refractory AF. Repeat cMRI imaging and invasive catheter mapping was performed prior to repeat PV ablation in 50 PVs from 14 additional patients with recurrent AF. Contraction in PVs with sustained isolation after the initial ablation was compared to contraction in PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff PV contraction value for prediction of PV‐atrial reconnection after ablation. The cutoff value was then prospectively tested in 40 PVs from 12 additional patients. Results: PV contraction decreased after AF ablation (22.4 ± 10% variation in CSA before ablation vs 10.1 ± 8% variation in CSA after ablation, P < 0.00001). PVs with sustained isolation on invasive mapping contracted less than PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium (13.7 ± 10.6% vs 21.4 ± 9.3%, P = 0.021). PV contraction produced a c‐index of 0.74 for prediction of PV‐atrial reconnection after ablation and >17% variation in PV CSA predicted reconnection with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 66.7%. Conclusion: PV contraction is reduced by ablation. PV contraction measurement may provide a noninvasive method to test for PV isolation after ablation procedures. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 169‐174, February 2011)     

Acute and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome After Endoscopic Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results from the First Prospective,Multicenter Study

Clinical Outcome After Endoscopic PVI. Introduction: The acute and long‐term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using an endoscopic ablation system (EAS) has only been reported in single‐center studies. The current prospective, multicenter study assessed the acute and 1‐year outcome following PVI using the EAS. Methods and Results: Seventy‐two patients (34 female, mean age 58 ± 10 years) with a history (5 ± 6 years) of drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Endoscopic PVI was performed in all patients. Follow‐up was based on regular telephone interviews, Holter ECG, and transtelephonic ECG recordings. Recurrence was defined as a symptomatic and/or documented AF episode >30 seconds following a blanking period of 3 months. In 72 patients, a total of 281 pulmonary veins (PVs) were targeted and 277/281 (98.6%) PVs were isolated successfully using only the EAS. PV stenosis, thrombembolic events, pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, and phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 0 of 72, 0 of 72, 3 of 72 (4.2%), 4 of 72 (5.6%), and in 1 of 72 (1.4%) patients, respectively. Sixty‐seven of 72 (93.1%) patients completed a follow‐up of 365 days and 42 of 67 (62.7%) patients remained in stable sinus rhythm after a single procedure. A total of 13 of 25 (52%) patients suffering from AF recurrence consented to repeat PVI using conventional radiofrequency energy 221 ± 121 days after the index procedure. LA to PV reconduction was found in 30 of 45 (67%) previously isolated PVs. Conclusions: A very high rate of acute electrical PVI is achieved using exclusively the EAS. The 1‐year single‐procedure success rate in patients with paroxysmal AF is comparable to conventional PVI. PV reconduction is the major determinant for AF recurrence. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 7‐13, January 2013)     

Image‐Integration of Intraprocedural Rotational Angiography‐Based 3D Reconstructions of Left Atrium and Pulmonary Veins into Electroanatomical Mapping: Accuracy of a Novel Modality in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

DynaCT Cardiac Integration into Electroanatomical Mapping. Introduction: Exact visualization of complex left atrial (LA) anatomy is crucial for safety and success rates when performing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study was to validate the accuracy of integrating rotational angiography‐based 3‐dimensional (3D) reconstructions of LA and pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy into an electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system. Methods and Results: In 38 patients (62 ± 8 years, 25 females) undergoing catheter ablation of paroxysmal (n = 19) or persistent (n = 19) AF, intraprocedural rotational angiography of LA and PVs was performed. The subsequent 3D reconstruction and segmentation of LA and PVs was transferred to the EAM system and registered to the EAM. The distances of all EAM points to corresponding points on the LA syngo® DynaCT Cardiac surface were calculated. Segmentation of LA with clear visualization of adjacent structures was possible in all patients. Also, the integrated segmentation of the LA was used to guide the encirclement of ipsilateral veins, which resulted in PV isolation in all patients. Integration into the 3D mapping system was achieved with a distance error of 2.2 ± 0.4 mm when compared with the EAM surface. Subgroups with paroxysmal and persistent AF showed distance errors of 2.3 ± 0.3 mm and 2.1 ± 0.4 mm, respectively (P = n.s.). Conclusion: Intraprocedural registration of LA and PV anatomy by contrast enhanced rotational angiography was feasible and accurate. There were no differences between patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Therefore, integration of rotational angiography‐based reconstructions into 3D EAM systems might be helpful to guide catheter ablation for AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 278–283, March 2010)     

Outcomes of Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis

AF Ablation in HD Patients . Introduction: It is not common for patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) to undergo catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to show the outcomes of AF ablation in the HD patients. Methods and Results: Thirty HD patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for drug refractory paroxysmal AF were retrospectively studied, and their AF recurrence free rate and frequency of periprocedural complications were compared to 60 age‐ and gender‐matched control patients not requiring HD. A nonirrigated ablation catheter was used in both patient groups. During a mean follow‐up period of 821 ± 218 days, 16 (54%) of the HD patients remained free from AF recurrence without any antiarrhythmic agents versus 47 (78%) of the control patients with an initial ablation (P = 0.013). A second ablation procedure was performed in 12 patients with an AF recurrence, and consequently 20 (67%) of the HD patients were in sinus rhythm compared to 53 (88%) of the controls during a follow‐up duration of 747 ± 221 after the last ablation (P = 0.012). Bleeding from the venipuncture site requiring a prolonged hospital stay was identified in 2 HD patients and 1 control subject, while no life‐threatening complications were observed in either patient group. Conclusion: Although the success rate of the PV isolation in HD patients was far from satisfactory, it may be considered as one of the therapeutic options for them. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1289‐1294, December 2012)     

Comparison of ThermoCool® Surround Flow Catheter Versus ThermoCool® Catheter in Achieving Persistent Electrical Isolation of Pulmonary Veins: A Pilot Study

Persistent Electrical Isolation of Pulmonary Veins . Introduction: Aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of the new ThermoCool Surround Flow® catheter (SFc) versus the ThermoCool® (TCc) in achieving persistent circumferential electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results: This multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled patients suffering from paroxysmal AF. Randomization was run in a one‐to‐one fashion between radiofrequency ablation by TCc or SFc. Aim of PVs ablation was documentation of electrical isolation with exit/entrance block recorded on a circular catheter. Among the 106 enrolled patients, 52 (49.0%) were randomized to TCc and 54 (51.0%) to SFc. Total volume of infused saline solution during the procedure was lower in the SFc than in TCc group (752.7 ± 268.6 mL vs 1,165.9 ± 436.2 mL, P < 0.0001). Number of identified and isolated PVs was similar in the 2 groups. Number of PVs remaining isolated 30 minutes after ablation was higher in the SFc than in TCc group (95.2% vs 90.5%, P < 0.03), mainly driven by acute ablation result in the left PVs (96.1% vs 89.7%, P < 0.04). Complications were seldom and observed only in the TCc group (0% vs 3.84%, P < 0.03). At 6‐month follow‐up SFc patients reported a trend toward less AF recurrences compared to those in the TCc group (22.9% vs 27.0%, P = 0.69). Conclusion: PV isolation by SFc lowered the rate of left PV early reconnections and reduced the volume of infused saline solution while maintaining the safety profile of AF ablation. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 269‐273, March 2013)     

ATP‐Induced Dormant Pulmonary Veins Originating from the Carina Region After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Atrial Fibrillation

Dormant Pulmonary Veins from the Carina Region . Introduction: Elimination of transient pulmonary vein recurrences (dormant PVs) induced by an ATP injection and ablation at the PV carina region is an effective strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The relationship between dormant PVs and the PV carina region has not been evaluated. Methods: A total of 212 consecutive symptomatic AF patients underwent circumferential PV electrical isolation (CPVEI) with a double lasso technique. They were divided into 2 groups in a retrospective review; Group 1: those given an ATP injection during an intravenous isoproterenol infusion after the CPVEI (n = 106), and Group 2: those in which it was not given after the CPVEI (n = 106). Radiofrequency energy was applied at the earliest dormant PV activation site identified using a Lasso catheter on the CPVEI line and then PV carina region if it was ineffective. Results: After a successful PVEI, 54 patients (51%) in Group 1 had PV reconnections during an ATP injection. Acute PVEI sites were observed on the carina region within the CPVEI line in the right PVs (16%) and left PVs (10%). Dormant PVs were reisolated at the carina region in the right PVs (23%) and left PVs (26%). The distribution of the dormant PV sites, except for the RIPV, significantly differed from that of the acute PVEI sites (P < 0.05). Further, AF recurred significantly in the Group 2 patients as compared to those in Group 1 during 16 ± 6.1 months of follow‐up (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PV carina region origins may partly be responsible for an acute PVEI and potential recurrences. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 494‐500, May 2010)     

Long‐Term Outcome of Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Originating from Nonpulmonary Vein Ectopy

Long‐Term Outcome of NPV AF Ablation . Introduction: Data regarding the long‐term outcome of catheter ablation in patients with nonpulmonary vein (NPV) ectopy initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the long‐term result of patients with AF who had NPV triggers and underwent catheter ablation. Methods and Results: The study included 660 consecutive patients (age 54 ± 11 years old, 477 males) who had undergone catheter ablation for AF. Group 1 consisted of 132 patients with AF initiating from the NPV, and group 2 consisted of 528 patients with AF initiating from pulmonary vein (PV) triggers only. Patients from Group 1 were younger than those from Group 2 (51 ± 12 years old vs 54 ± 11 years old, P = 0.001) and were more likely to be females (34.4% vs 25.8%, P = 0.049). The incidences of nonparoxysmal AF (36.4% vs 16.3%, P < 0.001) and right atrial (RA) enlargement (31.3% vs 19%, P = 0.004) were higher, and the biatrial substrates were worse in Group 1 than those in Group 2 (left atrial voltage 1.5 ± 0.7 mV vs 1.9 ± 0.7 mV, P < 0.001, RA voltage 1.6 ± 0.5 mV vs 1.8 ± 0.6 mV, P = 0.014). During a follow‐up period of 46 ± 23 months, there was a higher AF recurrence rate in Group 1 than in Group 2 (57.6% vs 38.8%, P < 0.001). The independent predictors of AF recurrence were NPV trigger (P < 0.001, HR 2, 95% CI 1.4–2.85), nonparoxysmal AF (P = 0.021, HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.07–2.24), larger left atrial diameter (P = 0.002, HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.07) and worse left atrial substrate (P = 0.028, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.03–1.64). Conclusion: Compared to AF originating from the PV alone, AF originating from the NPV ectopy showed a worse outcome. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 250‐258, March 2013)     

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation at the Time of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Patients With Atrial Flutter Without Documented Atrial Fibrillation Derives a Better Long‐Term Benefit

AF Ablation in Patients With Only Documentation of Atrial Flutter. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) at the time of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is beneficial in patients with lone atrial flutter (AFL). Background: A high proportion of patients with lone persistent AFL have recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) after CTI ablation. However, the benefit of AF ablation in patients with only documentation of AFL has not been determined. Methods: Forty‐eight patients with typical lone persistent AFL (age 56 ± 6; 90% male) were randomized to CTI ablation (Group A; n = 25) or to CTI + PV isolation (PVI) (Group B; n = 23). In addition to PVI, some patients in group B underwent ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and/or creation of left atrial roof and mitral isthmus ablation line in a stepwise approach when AF was induced and sustained for more than 2 minutes. Mean follow‐up was 16 ± 4 months with a 48‐hour ambulatory monitor every 2 months. Results: There were no recurrences of AFL in either group. Six patients in group B (22%) underwent a stepwise ablation protocol. AF organized and terminated in 5 patients during ablation (83%). Complication rate was not significantly different among the groups. Twenty patients in group B (87%) and 11 patients in group A (44%) were free of arrhythmias on no medications at the end of follow‐up (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Ablation of AF at the time of CTI ablation results in a significantly better long‐term freedom from arrhythmias. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 34‐38, January 2011)     

Robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: midterm efficacy and predictors of postablation arrhythmia recurrences

Robotic Navigation in Ablation of Paroxysmal AF . Introduction: Remote navigation systems represent a novel strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The goal of this study is to describe a single‐center experience with the electromechanical robotic system (Sensei, Hansen Medical) in treatment of patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods: Out of 200 patients who underwent robotically guided ablation for AF between 2007 and 2009 at our institute, 100 patients (29 women, age 56.5 ± 10 years) had paroxysmal AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Electroanatomic mapping using NavX system (St. Jude Medical) provided anatomical shell for subsequent circumferential ablation with robotic catheter (Artisan) loaded with a 3.5‐mm, open‐irrigation, cooled‐tip ablation catheter. Results: A mean of 69 radiofrequency current applications (duration 2082 ± 812 seconds) were delivered to achieve circumferential electrical isolation of pulmonary venous antra. Total procedural time reached 222 ± 54 minutes. The mean fluoroscopic time was 11.9 ± 7.8 minutes. There were no major procedure‐related complications. After a median follow‐up of 15 months (range 3‐28 months), 63% of the patients were free from any atrial arrhythmias ≥ 30 seconds after the single procedure. Success rate increased to 86% after 1.2 procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that only predictor of recurrent AF/AT was shorter overall procedural time (207 ± 36 vs 236 ± 64 minutes in patients with and without recurrences, respectively, P = 0.0068). Conclusions: This study demonstrates feasibility and safety of robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. Midterm follow‐up documents success rate comparable to other technologies and potential for improvement in more extensive ablation along the ridges with thicker myocardium. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 534‐540 May 2011)     

Reversal of left ventricular dysfunction following ablation of atrial fibrillation

Background: Evaluation of ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be difficult, and the presence of an AF‐induced ventricular cardiomyopathy due to intermittent poor rate control or other causes may be underestimated. The outcome with AF ablation in patients with a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may provide insight into this important clinical issue. Objective: To determine the effect of pulmonary vein isolation on LVEF in patients with AF and decreased LVEF (≤50%). Methods: Ablation consisted of proximal isolation of arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins (PVs) and elimination of non‐PV triggers. LVEF was determined within 24 hours after ablation and again at up to 6 months follow‐up. Transtelephonic monitoring was performed routinely for 2–3 weeks prior to ablation, at 6 weeks, and 6 months post and with symptoms following ablation. AF control was defined as freedom from AF or marked (>90%) reduction in AF burden on or off previously ineffective antiarrhythmic medication. Results: AF ablation was performed in 366 patients and 67 (18%) patients had decreased LV function with a mean LVEF of 42 ± 9%. An average of 3.4 ± 0.9 PVs were isolated. AF control in the depressed LVEF group compared favorably with the normal EF group (86% vs. 87% P = NS), although more redo procedures were required (1.6 ± 0.8 vs 1.3 ± 0.6 procedures; P ≤ 0.05). Only 15 of 67 patients (22%) with decreased LVEF had shown tachycardia (>100 bpm) on repeated preablation ECG recordings during AF. In the decreased LVEF group, the LVEF increased from 42 ± 9% to 56 ± 8% (P < 0.001) after ablation. Conclusions: Patients with AF and decreased LVEF undergoing AF ablation have similar success to patients with normal LVEF and have improvement in LVEF after ablation. These results suggest the presence of a reversible AF‐induced ventricular cardiomyopathy in many patients with AF and depressed LV function. The presence of under‐recognized and reversible cardiomyopathy even when tachycardia is not persistent is important to recognize.     

Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation and Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Ablation without Additional Substrate Modification for Treating Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

PV Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: Effectiveness of antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) and ablation of non‐PV triggers (non‐PVTA) in controlling longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been reported. We sought to describe clinical outcomes with this ablation strategy in patients (pts) followed for at least 1 year. Methods: Two hundred pts underwent PVAI for longstanding persistent AF and were followed for recurrence. Thirty‐three pts with <1‐year follow‐up and 37 pts with additional RF atrial ablation were excluded, leaving 130 pts for analysis. Results: All 130 pts (108 men, mean LA 4.7 ± 0.6 cm, mean AF duration of 38 ± 44 months) underwent PVAI with entrance/exit block. In addition, 24 pts (15 pts during the initial procedure and 9 additional pts at repeat ablations) had 40 non‐PVTA, including 3 with AVNRT. During follow‐up, atrial flutter (AFL) was noted in 7 (5%) pts. The AF‐free survival after single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) was 38%. Repeat AF or AFL ablation was performed in 37 pts (28%) with PV reconnection uniformly identified (3.7 ± 0.5 veins/pt). During mean follow‐up of 41.1 ± 23.8 months (range 12–103 months), 85/130 pts (65%) were in sinus rhythm with 65 pts (50%) off AAD, 20 pts (15%) on AAD. Additionally, 9 pts (7%) have had rare episodes of AF such that 72% of pts have had good long‐term clinical outcome. Of the 36 pts with recurrent AF, 20 pts have not had a repeat procedure. Conclusions: PVAI with non‐PVTA for longstanding persistent AF provides good long‐term AF control in over 70% of patients with infrequent (5%) AFL. AAD therapy and repeat PVAI may be required for this optimal outcome. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 806‐813, August 2012)     

三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉消融治疗心房颤动

目的 探讨三维标测系统指导下环肺静脉消融治疗心房颤动的安全性和有效性.方法 阵发性心房颤动92例和持续性或永久性心房颤动36例,接受环肺静脉消融术.采用Carto电解剖标测系统,进行环肺静脉左心房线性消融,消融终点为肺静脉电隔离.手术结束时对心律仍为心房颤动者行同步直流电心脏复律.结果 完成"解剖学"环形消融线256条,其中58.6%达到电隔离肺静脉的终点,经寻找缝隙补充消融后最终248条(96.9%)消融线达到终点.手术时间(231±45)min、X线曝光时间(42±13)min和放电时间(66±17)min.术后随访平均10个月,无复发101例(78.9%).接受了再次手术15例,心内电生理检查证实14例有左心房-肺静脉传导,射频消融成功并随访30～270 d,两次射频消融术后总成功率为87.5%,其中阵发性心房颤动成功率为93.0%,持续性或永久性心房颤动为76.7%.并发症发生率为6.2%,包括心包填塞2例、小脑梗死2例、股静脉穿刺部位血肿1例和左侧大量血胸1例,经治疗后均痊愈.结论 以肺静脉电隔离为目标的环肺静脉消融术治疗心房颤动有效和安全.