High-efficiency DALI apheresis using 1,250 ml adsorbers in a hypercholesterolemic obese patient: a case report.

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) apheresis is the first method for direct adsorption of lipoproteins from whole blood and is therefore an easy and rapid procedure. The majority of patients reaches >60% acute low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction using either the DALI 750 or 1000 configuration. However, in patients with extremely high LDL-C levels or very large blood volumes, these configurations may lead to suboptimal results. The current study was performed to test the safety and efficacy of DALI 1250. In a severely obese patient (185 cm, 133 kg, blood volume 7.2 L, LDL-C 239 mg/dl), 11 L of blood (1.53-fold patient blood volume) was processed at a flow rate of 80 ml/min in 2.5 h; a combined heparin-plus-citrate anticoagulation regimen was used. Commercially available DALI 1250 and DALI hardware and disposables were manufactured by Fresenius HemoCare Adsorber Technology, St. Wendel, Germany. Twenty weekly sessions were performed. Clinically and technically, the apheresis sessions were completely uneventful. As compared to DALI 1000 (n = 4 sessions), the reduction rates by DALI 1250 (n = 20) improved for LDL-C (from 52% to 66%), lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) (53% vs. 66%), and fibrinogen (11% vs. 16%). There was a slight increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) loss (20% vs. 24%). Moreover, the absolute amount of LDL-C removed per session increased from 5.06 g to 5.94 g. Laboratory safety parameters remained within the normal range, the anticoagulation was well controlled, and the pressure gradients over the adsorber remained constant. In this case report, DALI 1250 was perfectly safe and significantly increased the efficacy of LDL-C and Lp(a) elimination compared to standard DALI. Thus, this high-efficiency version of DALI may be used in patients with extremely high LDL-C levels and/or large blood volumes.     

Low density lipoprotein hemoperfusion by direct adsorption of lipoproteins from whole blood (DALI apheresis): clinical experience from a single center.

The elimination of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) by conventional LDL apheresis techniques can only be achieved in a cell-free medium and thus requires the initial separation of plasma from the blood cells. The present paper describes the first LDL hemoperfusion system which is able to adsorb LDL and Lp(a) directly from whole blood. This simplifies the procedure substantially. The adsorber consists of polyacrylate ligands linked to a modified polyacrylamide matrix. These negatively charged polyacrylate ligands interact with the positively charged apoprotein B moiety of LDL and Lp(a), which results in selective adsorption of these lipoproteins onto the column. Three hypercholesterolemic patients suffering from overt atherosclerotic complications were treated weekly by direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) (n = 20 sessions each). All patients were on the highest tolerated dose of cholesterol synthesis enzyme (CSE) inhibitors. About 1.3 patient blood volumes were treated per session. The anticoagulation was performed with acid citrate dextrose (ACD-A). The following acute reductions were achieved: LDL: 66%; Lp(a): 63%; and triglycerides: 29%. High density lipoprotein (HDL) (-13%) and fibrinogen (-16%) were not substantially reduced. The sessions were essentially uneventful. Due to a low ACD-A infusion rate, no hypocalcemic episodes were registered. One patient on enalapril was treated without complications when this angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor was withdrawn 2 days prior to apheresis. In summary, in our hands, DALI apheresis proved to be a simple, safe, and efficient method of lipid apheresis in hypercholesterolemic patients refractory to conservative lipid lowering therapy.     

Direct adsorption of low-density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) from whole blood: results of the first clinical long-term multicenter study using DALI apheresis

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) is the first low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis technique by which atherogenic LDL and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) can be selectively removed from whole blood without plasma separation. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy, selectivity and safety of long-term DALI apheresis. Sixty-three hypercholesterolemic coronary patients were treated by weekly DALI sessions. Initial LDL-cholesterol (C) plasma levels averaged 238 +/- 87 mg/dl (range 130-681 mg/dl). On average, 34 sessions (1-45) were performed processing 1.5 patient blood volumes. The primary aim was to acutely reduce LDL-C by >or=60% per session. To this end, three different adsorber sizes could be employed, i.e., DALI 500, 750, and 1000, which were used in 4, 73, and 23% of the 2156 sessions, respectively. On average, 7387 ml of blood were processed in 116 min per session. This resulted in the following mean acute changes: LDL-C 198 --> 63 mg/dl (-69%), Lp(a) 86 --> 32 mg/dl (-64%), triglycerides 185 --> 136 mg/dl (-27%). HDL-C (-11%) and fibrinogen (-15%) were not significantly influenced. The mean long-term reduction of LDL-C was 42% compared to baseline while HDL-C slightly increased in the long run (+4%). The selectivity of LDL removal was good as recoveries of albumin, immunoglobulins, and other proteins exceeded 85%. Ninety-five percent of 2156 sessions were completely uneventful. The most frequent adverse effects were hypotension (1.2% of sessions) and paresthesia (1.1%), which were probably due to citrate anticoagulation. Access problems had to be overcome in 1.5%, adsorber and hardware problems in 0.5% of the sessions. In this multicenter long-term study, DALI apheresis proved to be an efficient, safe, and easy procedure for extracorporeal LDL and Lp(a) elimination.     

Efficacy and safety of DALI LDL-apheresis at high blood flow rates: a prospective multicenter study

Direct adsorption of lipids (DALI) is the first LDL-apheresis method compatible with whole blood. Usually, the blood flow rate is adjusted at 60-80 ml/min, which results in session times of about 2 hr. The present study was performed to test the safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] removal by DALI at high blood flow rates in order to reduce treatment time. Thirteen chronic DALI patients in seven centers suffering from hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C 162 +/- 42 mg/dl at baseline) and coronary artery disease were treated on a weekly or biweekly basis by DALI apheresis. The blood flow rate QB was held constant for at least two sessions, respectively, and was increased from 60 to 80, 120, 160, 200, and 240 ml/min. All patients had pre-existing av-fistulas. The anticoagulation was performed by a heparin bolus plus ACD-A at a ratio of citrate:blood ranging from 1:20 to 1:90. Clinically, the sessions were well tolerated and only 26/201 sessions (12%) of the treatments were fraught with minor adverse events. Acute LDL-C reductions (derived from LDL-C levels determined by lipoprotein electrophoresis) averaged 72/66/60/53/50/48% for QB=60/80/120/160/200/240 ml/min. Lp(a) reductions were 68/67/62/60/58/56%, whereas HDL-C losses were < or =10%. Routine blood chemistries and blood cell counts remained in the normal range. Treatment times averaged 142/83/45 min at Qb=60/120/240 ml/min. On average, DALI LDL-apheresis could be performed safely and effectively at high blood flow rates up to at least 120 ml/min in patients with good blood access, which significantly reduced treatment time from 142 to 83 min (-42%).     

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins from whole blood by DALI apheresis: technique and effects.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis can drastically reduce atherogenic lipoproteins in coronary patients in whom LDL and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) cannot be sufficiently reduced by conservative therapy. LDL and Lp(a) adsorption by polyacrylate/polyacrylamide (DALI) is the simplest procedure for clinical LDL apheresis to date. DALI was first applied in patients in 1994 and introduced into clinical routine in 1996. It is the first LDL-hemoperfusion system, i.e., it adsorbs LDL and Lp(a) directly from whole blood. This markedly simplifies the extracorporeal circuit, the handling of the system, and reduces significantly staff time and, especially at higher blood flow rates, treatment time. Its features are high selectivity and capacity of lipoprotein removal (maximum about 8 g low-density lipoprotein cholesterol per session). Using citrate anticoagulation, good biocompatibility is evidenced by the lack of cell losses, hemolysis, thrombotic events, and complement activation. Some clotting factors of the intrinsic system are also adsorbed. There is significant bradykinin activation that, however, does not cause problems in most patients if angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor medication is avoided. In a first long-term study, 93% of sessions were uneventful. Major side effects were citrate-induced paresthesias (1.3%) and hypotension (0.8%). To date, more than 25,000 DALI sessions have been performed all over the world.     

LDL-apheresis: indications and clinical experience in a tertiary cardiac centre

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of liposorber D low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis system in high-risk cardiac patients. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 466 treatments undertaken in eight patients with coronary heart disease. Five patients had severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), one had severe hypertriglyceridaemia and two were cardiac transplant recipients with FH intolerant to statins. Acute reductions during single sessions and preprocedural long-term changes in lipoprotein subfractions, laboratory safety parameters, adverse events and clinical outcome were recorded. RESULTS: In 352 treatments performed in seven patients, acute reductions averaged 52.8% (standard deviation: 8.61%) for total cholesterol (TC), 61.8% (10.13%) for LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), 21.1% (9.66%) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 71.1% (median) for lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and 44.5% (14.42%) for triglycerides (p < 0.05). Long-term reductions of TC, LDL-C, Lp(a) and triglycerides by 18.1%, 21.7%, 9.4% (median) and 19.8%, respectively, were achieved. HDL-C was increased by 7.5%. Results from the patient with severe hypertriglyceridaemia were analysed separately because of markedly elevated TC and triglycerides. Technical and clinical complications were mild and showed an incidence of 16.65% and 12.45% respectively. The most common clinical event was transient hypotension (5.8%), whereas vascular access difficulties (11.3%) represented a common technical problem. All patients demonstrated clinical improvement. However, two patients treated via a central line developed septicaemia, resulting in endocarditis in one of them. CONCLUSION: Liposorber D is a simple, safe and effective modality in reducing atherogenic lipoproteins in dyslipidaemic high-risk cardiac patients. The treatment via an arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access in this type of patient.     

Improvement of hemorheology by DALI apheresis: acute effects on plasma viscosity and erythrocyte aggregation in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Plasma viscosity (PV) and erythrocyte aggregation (EA) are determinants of microcirculation, especially under the compromised hemodynamic conditions resulting from atherosclerosis. Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) apheresis is the first method for direct adsorption of lipoproteins; it drastically reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]), and may therefore improve PV and EA. The current study was performed to test the effect of DALI on hemorheology. Six hypercholesterolemic patients who had been on regular LDL apheresis for at least several months were treated on a weekly or biweekly basis, on average 5 times each by DALI. Before and after each session, PV was measured by a capillary tube plasma viscosimeter and EA by rotational aggregometry. Single DALI sessions (n = 31) acutely decreased PV from 1.18 +/- 0.04 to 1.06 +/- 0.3 mPa (-10%) while EA improved from 22.8 +/- 4.4 to 13.3 +/- 4.5 (arbitrary units) (-42%). LDL-cholesterol, Lp(a), and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol were effectively reduced while the decrease of triglycerides and fibrinogen was only moderate. DALI apheresis exerted an acute positive effect on blood hemorheology which may have beneficial effects on microcirculation. This hypothesis is in accordance with the clinical observation that in some patients, improvement of angina and/or exercise tolerance can be observed after only a few DALI sessions where changes of coronary stenoses cannot be expected yet.     

Effects of direct adsorption of lipoproteins apheresis on lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein subtypes, and hemorheology in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease.

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) apheresis has been shown to reduce effectively low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) concentrations. However, the effects on nontraditional risk indicators such as hemorheology and LDL subtypes have not been investigated so far. Five patients (2 women, 3 men, age 53 +/- 8 years) with coronary artery disease and severe LDL hypercholesterolemia regularly treated with other LDL apheresis devices entered the study and were then treated with DALI for the first time. Hemorheological and lipoprotein parameters were measured before and immediately after the initial DALI apheresis as well as before the fourth DALI apheresis. Compared to baseline (before the first DALI apheresis), the following parameters were significantly improved (p < 0.05) after the first DALI apheresis: LDL cholesterol (69 +/- 28 versus 208 +/- 82 mg/dl) and cholesterol in each LDL subfraction as well as plasma viscosity (1.23 +/- 0.04 versus 1.37 +/- 0.06 mPa), C-reactive protein, native blood viscosity, red cell aggregation, and red cell deformability. When parameters before the fourth DALI apheresis were compared to baseline, LDL cholesterol was still lower, and red cell deformability was still improved while cholesterol in each subfraction showed a statistical trend to lower concentrations (0.08 < p < 0.14). In conclusion, DALI apheresis not only reduces LDL cholesterol but also induced a significant reduction of cholesterol in all LDL subfractions and improved various hemorheological parameters.     

Effects of plant stanol and sterol esters on serum phytosterols in a family with familial hypercholesterolemia including a homozygous subject

We studied the concentrations and ratios to cholesterol of noncholesterol sterols reflecting absorption (eg, campesterol) or synthesis (eg, lathosterol) of cholesterol off and on plant sterol and stanol ester spreads in serum and in different lipoproteins of a family with familial hypercholesterolemia, including heterozygous parents receiving no treatment and their homozygous offspring undergoing long-term treatment with statins and apheresis. Serum cholesterol levels were similar in the homozygous and heterozygous individuals, but the concentrations of sterols reflecting cholesterol absorption were as much as 10 times greater in the homozygous child than in the heterozygous parents, whereas the respective markers of cholesterol synthesis only tended to be higher. About 70% of squalene in the homozygous individual (60% in the heterozygous family members) and 85% to 90% of noncholesterol sterols (60%-80% in the heterozygous subjects) were transported by low-density lipoprotein. The ratios of absorption sterols to cholesterol were higher in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) than in very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), whereas those of synthesis markers and plant stanols were highest in VLDL. The ratios of absorption sterols in serum were mostly lower than those in HDL but higher than in VLDL, whereas the ratios of synthesis sterols in serum were lower than they were in VLDL. Both spreads reduced serum total cholesterol by about 14% in the heterozygous family members and 9% in the homozygous individual. The sterol ester spread increased serum plant sterol concentrations (eg, campesterol in the homozygous family member increased from 5 to 9 mg/dL) and the ratios to cholesterol, but the stanol ester spread decreased them. Plant sterol esters seemed to similarly decrease serum cholesterol in this family with familial hypercholesterolemia, but the clinical role of increased plant sterol concentrations, almost doubled in the LDL of homozygous individuals, is not known.     

Direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) from whole blood: first long-term clinical experience with a new LDL-apheresis system for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND: The DALI (direct adsorption of lipoproteins) LDL-apheresis system is a novel device for the removal of lipoproteins from whole blood. METHODS: We report the first long-term treatment experience (16.7 +/- 12.6 months; 57 +/- 43 treatments/patient) using different DALI adsorber sizes (DALI-500, DALI-750, DALI-1000) in seven patients with homozygous (n = 1) and severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. For each treatment, 1.6 fold of the calculated blood volume was processed. Treatments were scheduled at weekly or two-weekly intervals. RESULTS: The smallest DALI-500 configuration was unable to achieve sufficient removal of LDL cholesterol, with the adsorber being exhausted already at desorption of 65% of the calculated blood volume. In contrast, both larger adsorber systems effectively removed lipoproteins until the end of treatment. Therefore, the DALI-750 device was used for long-term treatment. LDL cholesterol (mean pretreatment value: 179 +/- 44 mg/dl) was reduced by 73.4 +/- 7.7% and Lp(a) levels (mean pretreatment value: 43 +/- 33 mg/dl) by 69.5 +/- 8.3%. HDL cholesterol (mean pretreatment value: 47 +/- 15 mg/dl) was reduced by 16.3 +/- 8.0% during the treatment. In the long term, LDL cholesterol was reduced by 54.0 +/- 10.5%--from 259 +/- 101 mg/dl to 119 +/- 19 mg/dl. No serious side effects occurred during the treatment. Long-term evaluation of other laboratory parameters showed a reduction in haemoglobin due to treatment-associated blood loss despite frequent iron supplementation. CONCLUSION: Sufficient reductions in LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) were achieved using the DALI-750 system and the treatment was well tolerated. The easy use and short period of 153 +/- 22 minutes required for each treatment are the major advantages of the DALI system as compared to other available LDL-apheresis devices. Potential particle release from the adsorber into the circulation must be ruled out before the system can be introduced in clinical routine.     

Lipoprotein apheresis in the management of severe hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipoproteinemia(a)—The Portuguese experience

Background

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are established causal risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lipoprotein apheresis is often required for treatment of patients with a high risk for CVD due to hypercholesterolemia and/or hyperlipoproteinemia(a).

Comparison of different treatment regimens in a case of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

The laboratory results of five periods of different treatment regimens were compared in a 19-year-old girl with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH): weekly low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis sessions with dextran sulfate columns (LA 15, Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) without statin administration; weekly LDL apheresis with polyacrylate columns (DALI, Fresenius Adsorber Technology, Bad Homburg, Germany) without statin; LDL apheresis as in Period 2 with 40 mg atorvastatin daily; LDL apheresis as in Period 2 with 80 mg atorvastatin daily; and fortnightly LDL apheresis sessions with polyacrilate and administration of 80 mg atorvastatin daily. The five treatments were given in the above order, and each lasted at least 2 months. To compare the effectiveness of the different methods, the blood levels of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were measured before each session, and the percentage decreases in the blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were recorded during sessions in Periods 1 and 2. In Periods 1 and 2, the biological effectiveness of LDL apheresis was comparable. Atorvastatin (40 mg daily) improved the blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, but lowered HDL-cholesterol values. Increasing the daily dose of atorvastatin from 40 mg to 80 mg did not significantly improve LDL-cholesterol levels. When the time between two sessions was longer (Period 5), the total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol values worsened and were comparable to those of Period 2 during which there was no atorvastatin treatment. In this case of homozygous FH, weekly sessions of LDL apheresis in association with atorvastatin at dose of 40 mg per day gave the best results.     

Low density lipoprotein apheresis by membrane differential filtration (cascade filtration).

Membrane differential filtration (MDF) is an apheresis technique with which atherogenic lipoproteins can be eliminated from plasma on the basis of particle size. In 52 patients (REMUKAST Study, 1,702 treatments), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was decreased by 61%, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 42%, and fibrinogen by 54%. Our own results in 3 patients show decreases of 62%, 31%, and 59%, respectively; lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) was reduced by 58%. The elimination of atherogenic lipoproteins was accompanied by a loss of macromolecules (IgM: 55%, IgG: 27%, alpha 2-macroglobulin: 49%) resulting in improved hemorrheologic parameters. Although HDL is eliminated with each apheresis session, pretreatment concentrations of HDL cholesterol increased by 24% during regular apheresis for 1 year (26 patients, REMUKAST Study). However, preapheresis concentrations of other macroglobulins such as immunoglobulins remained decreased compared to concentrations obtained before the first apheresis session (IgM: 34%, IgG: 23%, and IgA: 16%). We conclude that MDF apheresis is an effective method to lower elevated concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins. The concomitant loss of other macromolecules transiently improves hemorrheology but demands a close monitoring of immunoglobulin concentrations as a safety parameter.     

Serum lipids and apolipoproteins in patients with psoriasis.

Psoriasis is characterized by defects in the normal cycle of epidermal development that lead to epidermal hyperproliferation, altered maturation of skin cells, vascular changes and inflammation. Also, psoriasis has been associated with an abnormal plasma lipid metabolism. Changes in plasma lipid and lipoprotein composition in patients with psoriasis may be the reason for the increased risk of atherosclerosis in these patients. We determined serum concentrations of lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoprotein Al and B (apo A1 and apo B) in 72 patients with psoriasis and 30 age matched controls. Serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), apo A1 and apo B were measured by immunoprecipitation assays, and the lipids and other biochemical parameters by enzymatic methods. Serum Lp(a) and triglyceride (TG) were significantly higher in patients with psoriasis than in healthy control subjects (p<0.01 for both). Apo B was also found to be higher in the patient group, but the difference was not significant. The levels of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apo A1 did not differ significantly from those of the controls. These observations imply that serum Lp(a) and TG concentrations may play a role as risk factors for atherosclerotic disease in patients with psoriasis.     

高脂血症患者血浆脂蛋白(a)免疫复合物测定的意义

目的研究高脂血症患者脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]-循环免疫复合物[Lp(a)-C IC]的水平与血浆脂质之间的关系。方法用酶法和酶联免疫分析分别测定38例男性高脂血症患者和38名正常对照者的血脂及Lp(a)-C IC。结果高脂血症患者的总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、Lp(a)和Lp(a)-C IC水平显著高于对照组,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)低于对照组。血浆Lp(a)-C IC水平与LDL-C和Lp(a)浓度呈正相关,相关系数(r)分别为0.353(P=0.030)和0.735(P=0.000);Lp(a)-C IC与TG和HDL-C呈负相关,r分别为-0.433(P=0.007)和-0.346(P=0.030)。结论高脂血症患者体内存在高浓度的Lp(a)-C IC,其可能与该类人群易发粥样硬化有关。     

The familial hypercholesterolemia regression study: a randomized comparison of therapeutic reduction of both low-density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) versus low-density lipoprotein alone.

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), especially in the presence of a raised low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C). To ascertain whether reduction of both LDL and Lp(a) is more advantageous than reduction of LDL alone, patients with heterozygous FH and CHD were selected randomly to receive either LDL apheresis fortnightly plus simvastatin 40 mg/day or colestipol 20 g plus simvastatin 40 mg/day. Quantitative coronary angiography was undertaken before and after 2.1 years. Changes in serum lipids were similar in both groups except for the greater reduction of LDL-C and Lp(a) by apheresis. There were no significant differences in primary angiographic endpoints, and none of the angiographic changes correlated with Lp(a). Although LDL apheresis plus simvastatin was more effective than colestipol plus simvastatin in reducing LDL-C and Lp(a), it was not more beneficial in influencing coronary atherosclerosis. Decreasing Lp(a) seems unnecessary if LDL-C is reduced below 130 mg/dl.     

Comparison of different Lp (a) elimination techniques: A retrospective evaluation

Lipoprotein (a), abbreviated Lp (a), is accepted as a potential selective or additional risk factor for premature atherosclerosis. Though it may be considered to be closely related to low density lipoprotein, so far attempts to keep it under control with diet or cholesterol lowering medications have failed. Thus, extracorporeal elimination is the only effective treatment approach for patients with premature atherosclerosis. As different techniques for differential elimination such as precipitation, adsorption and filtration exist, it appeared of interest for us to retrospectively evaluate adsorption and filtration procedures in their capacity to lower Lp (a). Four patients with selectively elevated Lp (a) and eight patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and additional elevated Lp (a) could be evaluated. All patients had Lp (a) values of 80–120 mg/dl without treatment in common. Different plasma or whole blood volumes were processed to obtain 30 mg/dl Lp (a) as post-treatment target values. In patients with a selective elevation Lp (a)-apheresis, as developed from Prokovski, was the most potent elimination procedure, decreasing the Lp (a) by at least 81% of the initial value after processing 6 L of plasma followed from LDL-(immune) apheresis with 71%. Plasma differential filtration using the Kuraray LA 4 filter decreased Lp (a) by 70% processing only 3.4 L, however was less selective and limited by the loss of fibrinogen and other high molecular weight proteins. In patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and Lp (a) elevation in a range of 80–120 mg /dl LDL-(immune) apheresis removed >80% of Lp (a) processing 6 L of plasma whereas if 5 L were processed a removal of 76% was comparable to liposorption. Neither whole blood perfusion (DALI, Fresenius) nor filtration applying the Kuraray LA 5 filter was able to reach the desired target values.     

Effects of two whole blood systems (DALI and Liposorber D) for LDL apheresis on lipids and cardiovascular risk markers in severe hypercholesterolemia

LDL apheresis is an extracorporal modality to lower the concentration of atherogenic lipoproteins, e.g., LDL cholesterol. We compared two recently introduced whole-blood LDL apheresis systems inpatients with hypercholesterolemia in a randomized cross-over trial with respect to their effects on lipoproteins as well as on other cardiovascular risk markers. Six patients (4 women, 2 men, median age 62.5 years, median BMI 25.9 kg/m(2)) on regular LDL apheresis were randomly assigned to receive six weekly treatments with either DALI (Fresenius) or Liposorber D (Kaneka). After 6 weeks, the patients were switched to the other device (again six weekly treatments). Blood was drawn before and immediately after LDL apheresis at three time points (last regular apheresis before the study; after six treatments with DALI and after six treatments with Liposorber D). LDL cholesterol concentration before the sixth apheresis (DALI 129 mg/dL, Liposorber D 132 mg/dL) as well as LDL cholesterol reduction during the sixth apheresis (DALI 68.3% and Liposorber D 68.4%) were similar with the two systems. CRP and fibrinogen concentrations were lower but interleukin-6, myeloperoxidase, and resistin concentrations were higher after the last Liposorber treatment compared with DALI (P < 0.05, respectively). No differences were observed concerning adiponectin, ghrelin, and PYY levels. In conclusion, both devices were highly effective in eliminating atherogenic lipoproteins. CRP and fibrinogen were better eliminated with Liposorber D. However, following Liposorber D, interleukin-6 levels were higher than after DALI possibly indicating an increased inflammatory activation.     

LDL apheresis in clinical practice: long-term treatment of severe hyperlipidemia.

Thirty patients (13 males, 17 females) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid-lowering drugs were treated for 48.7 +/- 19.2 months (range, 2-87 months) with low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. Three different systems (dextran sulfate adsorption for 27 of 30 [Kaneka, Liposorber, Japan], immunoadsorption system for 2 of 30 [Baxter, Therasorb, Germany], immunoadsorption system with special lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] columns for 1 of 30 patients [Lipopak, Pocard, Russia]) were applied. Before LDL apheresis 24 of 30 patients suffered from coronary heart disease (CHD) with angina symptoms. With LDL apheresis, reductions of 46% for total cholesterol, 49% for LDL, 30% for Lp(a), and 38% for triglycerides were reached. Severe side effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.5%). In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced in 27 of 30 patients. A 60 to 100% reduction of nitrate medication was observed in 17 of 24 patients. Regarding the different apheresis systems used, at the end of the trial there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome experienced by the patients and concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high density lipoprotein, and triglyceride concentrations. But to reduce high Lp(a) levels, the immunoadsorption method with special Lp(a) columns seems to be the most effective (-57% versus 25% [Kaneka] and 23% [Baxter]). The present data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia, resistant to maximum conservative therapy, is very effective and safe, even in long-term application.     

Clinical application and effectiveness of low-density lipoprotein apheresis in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

The Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis Coronary Atherosclerosis Prospective Study (L-CAPS) examined whether or not combined low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis and drug therapy apheresis could induce the regression of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Twenty-eight patients treated with LDL apheresis and drugs and 11 patients treated with drugs alone underwent sequential coronary angiography 2.5 years apart. The frequency of cases with regression or no change was significantly higher for the apheresis group than for the control group (p = 0.004). The LDL apheresis Angioplasty Restenosis Trial (LART) investigated the hypothesis that high plasma lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) levels were associated with increased incidences of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Two days before and 5 days after angioplasty, 66 patients underwent LDL apheresis. The restenosis rates were 21% in the 42 patients whose Lp(a) levels were reduced > or = 50% and 50% in the 24 patients whose Lp(a) levels were reduced < 50% (p < 0.05). LDL apheresis is effective in the prevention of the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Its potential application in restenosis prevention should be further investigated.