Androgen receptors are frequently expressed in mammary and extramammary Paget's disease.

Mammary Paget's disease and extramammary Paget's disease are rare intraepithelial neoplasms. Mammary Paget's disease is almost exclusively associated with underlying invasive breast carcinoma or high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS G3). Extramammary Paget's disease arises in areas rich in apocrine glands and is suspected to have apocrine gland origin. The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR) and Her2/neu in a large number of cases. We investigated 58 cases of mammary and 23 cases of extramammary Paget's disease. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues were analyzed using antibodies against AR, PR, ER and Her2/neu according to standardized procedures. In mammary Paget's disease, positive immunoreactions for Her2/neu, AR and ER were observed in 56 of 58 (97%), 51 of 58 (88%), and respectively in six of 58 (10%) cases. All cases of mammary Paget's disease were negative for PR and showed a coexpression of Her2/neu and AR in 51 out of 58 cases (88%). In extramammary Paget's disease, positive immunoreactions for AR, Her2/neu and ER were observed in 18 of 23 (78%), 12 of 23 (52%), and respectively in 1 of 23 (4%) cases. All cases of extramammary Paget's disease were negative for PR and showed a coexpression of AR and Her2/neu in 12 out of 23 cases (52%). In contrast to ER and PR, AR and Her2/neu are commonly expressed in mammary and extramammary Paget's disease. The knowledge about frequent expression of AR in Paget's disease could lead to the development of a new adjuvant therapy, particularly in patients with recurrent disease.     

Prolactin receptor expression in gynaecomastia and male breast carcinoma

Aims:  Despite the well-established function of prolactin (PRL) in normal breast development, its role in breast cancer pathogenesis is still controversial. PRL activity is dependent on the activation of a transmembrane protein, the PRL receptor (PRLR). The aim was to evaluate and compare PRLR expression in gynaecomastia and male breast carcinoma (MBC).
Methods and results:  PRLR expression was detected immunohistochemically in 30 cases of gynaecomastia and 30 cases of MBC. The whole series was also assessed for oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and androgen receptors (AR). A cut-off of 10% was used as the criterion for positivity. Histological type and tumour differentiation were evaluated. Pathological stage was assessed [Tumour Node Metastasis (TNM)-International Union Against Cancer system]. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test. PRLR positivity was seen in 20% of gynaecomastia cases and in 60% of MBC cases ( P  = 0.003). In gynaecomastia immunoreactivity was predominantly observed in luminal cell borders, whereas in MBC the reactivity was heterogeneous and mainly cytoplasmic. There was no statistically significant correlation between PRLR expression and ER, PR, AR, pTNM, or histological grade.
Conclusions:  PRLR is significantly more expressed in MBC than in gynaecomastia, and with different patterns of reactivity, suggesting a role for PRL in male breast carcinogenesis.     

雄激素受体在乳腺癌中的表达及其与雌、孕激素受体和HER2的关系

目的 研究雄激素受体(AR)在乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达及其与雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和HER2状态的关系,探讨其作为乳腺癌治疗靶点的可行性.方法 采用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测AR、ER、PR、HER2在175例乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达,依据结果分为腺腔A型、腺腔B型、HER2过表达型和三阴性型(ER-/PR-/HER2-)组.结果 175例中AR阳性88例(50.3%),AR表达与ER、PR、HER2均呈正相关(P＜0.01).腺腔A型53例(30.3%),腺腔B型33例(18.9%),HER2过表达型23例(13.1%),三阴性型66例(37.7%),AR阳性率分别为56.6%(30/53),75.8%(25/33)、47.8%(11/23)和33.3%(22/66),组间AR阳性率差异显著(x2=17.054,P=0.001).三阴性型组AR阳性者核分裂象较少(x2=5.140,P=0.023),腺腔A型组AR阳性者多为年轻患者(x2=4.567,P=0.033),差异有统计学意义.其他组内AR表达与否和临床病理学特征比较无统计学意义.结论 AR在乳腺癌中有较高的阳性率,可作为乳腺癌,特别是三阴性型乳腺癌的治疗靶点.     

雄激素受体在乳腺癌中的表达及其与雌、孕激素受体和HER2的关系

目的 研究雄激素受体(AR)在乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达及其与雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和HER2状态的关系,探讨其作为乳腺癌治疗靶点的可行性.方法 采用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测AR、ER、PR、HER2在175例乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达,依据结果分为腺腔A型、腺腔B型、HER2过表达型和三阴性型(ER-/PR-/HER2-)组.结果 175例中AR阳性88例(50.3%),AR表达与ER、PR、HER2均呈正相关(P＜0.01).腺腔A型53例(30.3%),腺腔B型33例(18.9%),HER2过表达型23例(13.1%),三阴性型66例(37.7%),AR阳性率分别为56.6%(30/53),75.8%(25/33)、47.8%(11/23)和33.3%(22/66),组间AR阳性率差异显著(x2=17.054,P=0.001).三阴性型组AR阳性者核分裂象较少(x2=5.140,P=0.023),腺腔A型组AR阳性者多为年轻患者(x2=4.567,P=0.033),差异有统计学意义.其他组内AR表达与否和临床病理学特征比较无统计学意义.结论 AR在乳腺癌中有较高的阳性率,可作为乳腺癌,特别是三阴性型乳腺癌的治疗靶点.     

Immunohistochemical characterization of molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer: a study from North India

In recent years breast cancer has been classified on the basis of its molecular characteristics by gene expression profiling. A similar classification using immunohistochemistry has been identified so that it has a wider application. This study was designed to define the precise prevalence of molecular subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma using immunohistochemistry in patients from north India and to correlate it with known clinical and histological prognostic factors. Based on ER/PR/Her2/neu expression, 100 cases of invasive breast cancer were categorized into: ER+ and ? or PR+ and Her2/neu? (47%), ER+ and?or PR+ and Her2/neu+ (15%), ER? and ? or PR? and Her2/neu+ (Her2/neu overexpressing, 21%), ER?, PR? and Her2/neu? (Triple negative, 17%). All cases demonstrated positivity for the luminal Cytokeratins 8/18. In addition, 10% of these tumours showed expression of the basal markers (CK4/14, CK5/6). Among the 17 triple negative cases, eight cases were positive for one of the basal markers and two cases with basal marker expression were Her2/neu overexpressing. The basal markers showed significant correlations only with histological grade and ER negative status. On the basis of hormone receptor, Her‐2/neu and cytokeratin expressions, distinct subclasses of breast cancer have been identified which show significant differences in relation to histological grade and ER status. Expression of basal markers is needed to define basal‐like breast cancer.     

Androgen receptor is frequently expressed in HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative breast cancers

The estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-negative breast carcinomas (BCs) encompass three molecular subtypes: one with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER) overexpression, one normal like, and the triple negative. The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 70–90% of invasive BCs. The aim of our study is to detect the expression of AR in a series of ER/PR-negative BCs to ascertain if there is clinical significance in relation to BC molecular subtypes. A immunohistochemical study for all receptors and cytokeratin expression was performed in 232 cases of ER/PR-negative BCs. According to cytokeratin expression, BCs were classified into two groups: luminal-type BCs (44.2%) and basal-like-type BCs (55.8%). According to the expression of HER2, 59.3% were triple-negative BCs (when ER, PR, and HER2 were negative) and 40.7% were HER2-positive BCs. AR expression was observed in 128 tumors (56.6%). One hundred and ten cases (48.8%) had >10% and 18 (7.8%) had <10% of positively stained cells. AR immunoreactivity was found in 31.2% basal-like BCs, while in the luminal group 71.1% of cases were positive, showing highly significant correlation (p < 10⁻⁸). Regarding HER2 status, 76.7% of HER2-positive BC cases were AR positive compared with only 30.4% of triple-negative BC types, showing a strong statistically significant correlation. In conclusion, we show that AR is frequently expressed in ER/PR-negative BCs and that expression of HER2 and AR is highly correlated (p < 0.005). Our results point out the role of AR and HER2 in the pathogenesis of BCs and suggest the potential role of AR in clinical management of ER/PR-negative BCs.     

MYC gene amplification is often acquired in lethal distant breast cancer metastases of unamplified primary tumors

In breast cancer, amplification of MYC is consistently observed in aggressive forms of disease and correlates with poor prognosis and distant metastases. However, to date, a systematic analysis of MYC amplification in metastatic breast cancers has not been reported. Specifically, whether the MYC amplification status may change in metastases in comparison to the corresponding primary breast tumor, and potential variability among different metastases within the same patient have also not been assessed. We generated single patient tissue microarrays consisting of both primary breast carcinomas and multiple matched systemic metastases from 15 patients through our previously described rapid autopsy program. In total, the 15 tissue microarrays contained 145 primary tumor spots and 778 spots derived from 180 different metastases. In addition, two separate tissue microarrays were constructed composed of 10 matched primary breast cancers and corresponding solitary metastases sampled not at autopsy but rather in routine surgical resections. These two tissue microarrays totaled 50 primary tumor spots and 86 metastatic tumor spots. For each case, hormone receptor status, HER2/neu, EGFR and CK5/6 expression were assessed, and the cases were characterized as luminal, basal-like or HER2 based on published criteria. Both fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for MYC was performed on all cases. Of the 25 cases, 24 were evaluable. While 4 of 24 primary tumors (16%) demonstrated MYC amplification, an additional 6 (25% of total evaluable cases) acquired MYC amplification in their systemic metastases. Of note, there was remarkably little heterogeneity in MYC copy number among different metastases from the same patient. MYC immunoreactivity was increased in metastases relative to matched primaries in the surgical cohort, although there was no perfect correlation with MYC amplification. In conclusion, amplification of MYC is a frequent event in breast cancer, but occurs more frequently as a diffuse, acquired event in metastatic disease than in the corresponding primary. These observations underscore the importance of MYC in breast cancer progression/metastasis, as well as its relevance as a potential therapeutic target in otherwise incurable metastatic disease.     

Comparison of the expression of prognostic biomarkers between primary tumor and axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer

The prognosis and prediction of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases in breast cancer is traditionally based upon the biomarkers status of the primary tumor. Some retrospective studies showed significant discordance in receptor expression between primary and metastatic tumors. We aim to prospectively assess the incidence of discordant biomarkers status in primary tumor and ALN metastases and to evaluate the role of ALN biopsies for the reassessment of receptor status. Tissue arrays were constructed from 54 breast cancer patients with ALN metastases diagnosed. Arrays were immuno-stained to compare protein expression of four biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 by immunohistochemistry. The kappa value of consistency in the primary tumor and the metastatic lymph nodes were 0.465 for ER, 0.445 for PR, and 0.706 for HER2. Good consistency was shown for Ki67 expression in primary and metastases regions with T test. No significant difference is existed between primary tumor and ALN metastases. It is concluded that the good consistency is present for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 between the primary tumor and the metastatic lymph nodes, suggesting that ER, PR, HER2, or Ki67 status in primary tumors could reflect their status in ALN metastases.     

人眼睑板腺和Zeis腺性激素受体定性定位的免疫组织化学研究

目的探讨性激素受体在睑板腺和Zeis腺的定性和定位分布。方法采用免疫组织化学技术和DAB显色方法显示雌激素受体（ER）、孕激素受体（PR）、雄激素受体（AR）在睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮的表达。结果胎儿4个月睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮呈ER、PR、AR阳性;而儿童至成人组睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮呈ER、AR阳性。各种性激素受体定位同时出现在细胞膜、细胞质和细胞核。ER在睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮阳性表达率在年龄组间比较,均无显著性差异（P〉0．05）;PR在睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮阳性表达率在年龄组间比较,均有显著性差异（P〈0．05）：AR在睑板腺上皮阳性表达率在年龄组间比较无显著性差异（P〉0．05）,而Zeis腺上皮阳性表达率则有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。ER、PR、AR阳性表达率在胎儿组性别间比较和ER、AR阳性表达率在儿童至成人组性别间比较均无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。结论胎儿4个月睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮ER、PR、AR即有表达。出生后睑板腺和Zeis腺上皮仅存在ER和AR,以ER为主。ER、PR、AR定位在细胞膜、细胞质和细胞核。     

Steroid hormone receptor and COX-2 expression in chordoma

Reports of sex steroid receptor expression in chordoma suggest that these tumors may be responsive to hormone manipulation therapy. Immunohistochemical stains for estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha, ER-beta, progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), were performed on a tissue microarray containing 21 samples of chordoma. Most chordomas expressed COX-2, ER-beta, and AR, whereas ER-alpha and PR stains were negative in all cases. ER-beta expression did not correlate with AR expression (P = .4142; McNemar test). There were no statistically significant correlations between the expression of any of these markers and anatomic location of tumor, patient sex, patient age, or disease-free survival. Chordomas commonly express COX-2, AR, and ER-beta. These findings may have therapeutic implications concerning the use of agents that inhibit or modulate these signaling molecules.     

Hormonal receptors expression in epithelial cells of mammary phyllodes tumors correlates with pathologic grade of the tumor: a multicenter study of 143 cases

We used immunohistochemical analysis to detect the presence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR) protein expression in the epithelial and stromal cells of 143 phyllodes tumors (PTs). Expression of epithelial ER and PR proteins was common, occurring in 43% to 84% of PTs. Expression of epithelial AR protein and stromal ER, PR, and AR proteins was low (5% or less) in all tumors. An inverse relationship of epithelial ER and PR protein expression with degree of malignancy in PT was found (P < .05), and ER expression also correlated with mitotic count (P < .05). When considering PT with the expression of ER or PR proteins and the coexpression of both, the inverse relationship with tumor grade also was significant (P < .05). As the hormonal receptor protein expression shows a consistent decrease with increasing malignancy, we infer that the epithelium has a crucial role in the pathogenesis or progression of PT.     

不同ER、PR状态乳腺癌中AR的表达及其意义

目的探讨AR在不同ER、PR状态乳腺癌中的表达及意义。方法采用免疫组化方法检测AR、ER、PR在173例乳腺癌中的表达,依据结果分组:(1)AR状态分组:AR阳性组和AR阴性组;(2)ER、PR状态分组:En组(ER、PR均阴性)、Ep组[ER和(或)PR阳性];(3)AR、ER、PR联合分组:En-AR+(En组且AR阳性)、En-AR-(En组且AR阴性)、Ep-AR+(Ep组且AR阳性)、Ep-AR-(Ep组且AR阴性),其中En-AR-又称为均阴性组,其他三组统称为部分或完全阳性组。不同分组方法比较与临床病理特征的关系。结果Ep组AR阳性率62.8%(54/86),En组AR阳性率37.9%(33/87),两组差异有显著性(P=0.001),AR阳性组体积小、核分裂少、组织学分级低(P0.05);En-AR-组表现为核分裂多、组织学分级高(P0.01),此外En组内AR阳性者核分裂少、组织学分级低(P0.05),Ep组内AR阳性者临床分期高(P=0.000),En-AR+、Ep-AR+、Ep-AR-比较均无差异。结论AR在不同激素状态乳腺癌中表达的意义不同,ER、PR均阴性乳腺癌表达AR者预后较好,ER、PR阳性乳腺癌表达AR者临床分期高。在选择针对性药物时应考虑到不同激素受体状态的组合。     

Expression of steroid hormone receptors, their regulated proteins, and bcl-2 protein in myofibroblastoma of the breast

AIMS: To investigate the possible role of steroid hormones in the pathogenesis of myofibroblastoma (MFB) of the breast, we analysed the immunohistochemical expression of oestrogen, progesterone, androgen receptors, their regulated proteins and bcl-2 protein in a series of this rare tumour. METHODS AND RESULTS: Paraffin-embedded sections from seven cases of MFB of the breast (five male; two female) were immunohistochemically tested for the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), oestrogen-regulated pS2 protein, androgen-regulated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and bcl-2 protein. Rare cases of benign spindle cell tumours or tumour-like lesions of the breast (primitive fibromatosis, inflammatory pseudotumour, muscular hamartoma) which enter into the differential diagnosis with MFB, were also investigated and compared with MFB. All cases of MFB showed a diffuse (70-90% of neoplastic cells) and strong nuclear labelling with ER and PR, whereas AR was expressed only in three cases (two men and one woman) in about 60-70% of cells. Conversely, no immunostaining was detected for the pS2 protein and PSA. bcl-2 protein immunoreactivity was found in all cases of MFB, although with a variable degree of expression. No expression for steroid hormone receptors, their regulated-proteins and bcl-2 protein was observed in the rare benign spindle cell lesions of the breast included in this study. CONCLUSION: The in-situ detection of ER, PR and AR suggests that steroid hormones and their receptors are implicated in the pathogenesis of breast MFB. The consistent demonstration of bcl-2 protein, associated with a positive ER/PR status, provides evidence that bcl-2 may be an oestrogen-regulated protein also in MFB and that probably plays a role in the tumorigenesis. Finally, we postulate that the ER/PR and bcl-2 positive immunoprofile of MFB of the breast, in contrast to the negative profile of other rare primitive benign spindle cell lesions of the breast herein studied, might be exploited as an ancillary diagnostic aid in differential diagnosis of doubtful cases.     

Estrogen receptor alpha and androgen receptor are commonly expressed in well-differentiated liposarcoma

Background

Liposarcoma (LS) is the second-most common type of soft-tissue sarcoma. Despite advances in knowledge and treatment of this disease, there remains a need for more effective LS therapy. Steroid hormone receptors regulate metabolism in adipocytes. Estrogen receptor alpha (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of other cancer types. We sought to comprehensively determine temporal expression patterns of these receptors in LS.

Methods

We analyzed 561 histologically subtyped LS specimens from 354 patients for expression of ER, PR, and AR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using diagnostic-grade reagents and protocols. The fractions of positively stained tumor cells were scored within each specimen. IHC scores were compared across LS subtypes using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and subtypes were compared using Dunn’s post-hoc test. Ages of patients with receptor-positive vs. -negative LS were compared by t-test. Genders and races were compared for hormone receptor positivity using Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square analysis, respectively. Recurrence-free survival was compared between receptor-positive and negative patients by log-rank test. p<?0.05 was considered significant.

Results

ER and AR were frequently expressed in LS, while few tumors expressed PR. Most of the ER?+?and AR?+?samples were of the well-differentiated LS subtype. A smaller fraction of de-differentiated LS expressed ER or AR, but expression was common within well-differentiated regions of tumors histologically classified as de-differentiated LS. In LS specimens from patients who underwent multiple surgeries over time, receptor expression frequently changed over time, which may be attributable in part to intratumor heterogeneity, varying degrees of de-differentiation, and biopsy bias. ER and AR were frequently co-expressed. Receptor status was not significantly associated with gender or race, but AR and PR expression were associated with earlier age at diagnosis. Receptor expression was not associated with altered recurrence-free survival.

Conclusions

ER and AR are commonly expressed in LS, particularly in well-differentiated tumors. These data warrant further functional study to determine receptor function in LS, and the potential efficacy of anti-hormone therapies for the treatment of patients with LS.

     

Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Pristauz G, Petru E, Stacher E, Geigl J B, Schwarzbraun T, Tsybrovskyy O, Winter R & Moinfar F
(2010) Histopathology 57, 877–884 Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations Aim: To assess the expression of receptors for androgen (AR), oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her‐2/neu) status of breast carcinomas in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and BRCA1/2 negative tested women. Methods: One hundred and thirty‐five breast cancers in women tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was performed by direct sequencing of all BRCA1 and BRCA2 exons as well as the surrounding intronic sequences. Additionally, BRCA genes were analysed with multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification. Consecutive paraffin sections were examined immunhistochemically for AR, ER, PR and Her‐2/neu. Results: Of the 135 tumours, 43 (32%) were BRCA1‐related, 18 (13%) were BRCA2‐related and 74 (55%) were BRCA1/2‐negative. Seventy‐two per cent of the BRCA1‐related, 22% of the BRCA2‐related and 12% of the BRCA1/2‐negative tumours were triple (ER, PR, Her2neu)‐negative. Eighty‐four per cent of BRCA1 mutated cancers were high‐grade (G3) tumours. ARs were expressed in 30% (13 of 43) of BRCA1‐related, in 78% (14 of 18) in BRCA2‐related tumours and in 76% (56 of 74) in BRCA1/2 negative tumours. Twenty‐one per cent of ER‐negative BRCA1‐related tumours expressed androgen receptors. Conclusion: Approximately one in five BRCA1 mutated breast cancers negative for ER and PR express androgen receptors. Modulation of AR might open a new avenue for treating these high‐risk cancers.     

The expression pattern of MUC1 (EMA) is related to tumour characteristics and clinical outcome in 'pure' ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS: To classify MUC1 according to five predefined expression patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and related clinicopathological parameters, coexpression of other biological markers and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: With a manual tissue arrayer, 92% (n = 80) of the 87 DCIS samples were successfully targeted. Immunohistochemistry was carried out for MUC1, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Her2/Neu, p53 and cyclin D1. Entire membrane expression was related to Her2/neu negativity (P =0.042). Apical membrane expression was associated with low grade (P = 0.027), Her2/neu negativity (P = 0.014) and PR positivity (P = 0.005). Focal cytoplasmic expression was related to high grade (P = 0.006). Diffuse cytoplasmic expression was associated with high grade (P = 0.004), large tumour size (P = 0.046), Her2/neu positivity (P =0.042) and cyclin D1 positivity (P = 0.002). On the basis of these analyses the four patterns were reclassified as membranous or cytoplasmic expression. On multivariate analysis, cytoplasmic MUC1 expression (hazard ratio 8.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 73.0; P = 0.04) was the only independent predictor of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Four patterns of MUC1 expression are recognized in DCIS that suggest a relationship to functional differentiation and can be simplified into two types that are clinically relevant and could therefore be helpful in the distinction between different subgroups of DCIS.     

Androgen receptor expression in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Immunohistochemical, clinical, and prognostic associations

We sought to determine the prevalence of androgen receptor (AR) expression in a predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-negative subset of breast cancers and delineate the immunohistochemical and clinical associations, including whether AR expression has prognostic significance in ER-negative tumors. We identified 69 ER-negative and 19 ER-positive breast cancer cases with concurrent immunohistochemical prognostic panels (ER, PR, HER-2/neu, Ki-67, and p53); immunohistochemical analysis was performed for AR using standard techniques. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. chi 2 tests were used to assess associations between variables. AR was found in 49% (34/69) of ER-negative and 89% (17/19) of ER-positive cases. In ER-negative tumors, AR was associated with increased age (P = .02), postmenopausal status (P < .001), tumor grade (P = .03), tumor size (P = .03), and HER-2/neu overexpression (P = .003). In ER-positive tumors, AR was associated with progesterone receptor expression (P < .03). In univariate analysis of ER-negative tumors, patients with AR-positive tumors had significantly better disease-free survival (P = .049). AR is expressed in a significant number of ER-negative cases and shows significant associations with important clinical and pathologic prognostic factors.     

Coordinated expression of ER, PR and HER2 define different prognostic subtypes among poorly differentiated breast carcinomas

Aims:  Histological grade is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast carcinomas, but poorly differentiated neoplasms still have quite heterogeneous biological behaviour, since they can be genetically classified as basal-like, HER2+ or even luminal. The aim was to analyse the frequency of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 expression profiles among breast carcinomas with <10% tubular formation, and their correlation with classic prognostic factors.
Methods and results:  One hundred and thirty-four samples of paraffin-embedded tumours were studied retrospectively. The tumours were classified in to four groups by their ER/PR/HER2 profile: (i) ER+ and/or PR+ but HER2−; (ii) ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2+; (iii) ER− and/or PR− but HER2+; and (iv) ER−, PR− and HER2− (triple-negative). The histological features of triple-negative and HER2+ carcinomas overlap. The only difference was the expression of basal cytokeratins (basal CK), which was more frequent among triple-negative carcinomas. Basal-CK expression defined a more aggressive group of tumours, according to the pathological features, regardless of the immunohistochemical profile.
Conclusions:  Group 1 and 2 tumours (ER+ and/or PR+ tumours with or without HER2 expression) were not statistically different, suggesting that poorly differentiated carcinomas with hormone receptors correspond to the luminal B type of tumour. Among poorly differentiated breast carcinomas, the classic profile associated with basal-CK identifies distinct subtypes equivalent to those seen by genetic classification.     

Correlation of steroid hormone receptors (SR) with clinical and pathological features of human breast cancer

Paraffin-embedded materials from 104 patients with breast cancer were assayed for the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) with avidin-biotin complex method. A significant positive correlation was found between SR status and cell differentiation or lymph node status. Tumors with elastosis tend to contain ER, PR and AR more frequently. Patients with positive ER, PR or AR tumors were 1.2 to 2.6 times more likely to survive than those with negative ones. The five-year survival rate increased with the increase of number and amount of positive SR. These results indicate that ER, PR and AR detected by ABC method may be used as biomarkers for tumor differentiation and have prognostic values in breast cancer.     

Strong androgen receptor expression is not useful in distinguishing GATA3 + metastases

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) immunohistochemical expression is commonly considered to be a sensitive and specific diagnostic marker for breast and urothelial carcinomas in surgical pathology practice. However, since its expression has been also demonstrated in other tumors, GATA3 should be better used in conjunction with other immunohistochemical markers to establish tumor primitivity in metastatic setting.Interestingly, GATA3 expression seems to be significantly correlated with androgen receptor (AR) expression in breast carcinoma. In addition, strong AR expression -defined as immunohistochemical positivity in more than 60% of tumor cells- was suggested to be 100% specific for breast origin in GATA3+ metastases.The aim of this study was to verify whether strong AR expression may actually be useful to determine primivity in GATA3+ metastatic setting. Thus, we investigated AR and GATA3 immuno-expression in a cohort of metastatic tumors derived from urothelial, breast, endometrial and salivary gland carcinomas. We did not find any GATA3 or AR expression in the metastases from endometrial or salivary gland carcinomas, while GATA3 expression was seen in the majority of metastases from urothelial or breast carcinomas. In addition, strong AR expression was seen in 73% and in 47% of metastatic breast and urothelial carcinomas, respectively.On the whole, our findings confirm that GATA3 is sensitive and specific for breast and urothelial origin in metastatic setting. According to our results, strong AR expression is not useful to distinguish breast from urothelial primitivity, as previously suggested.