Longevity of the novel ConvaTec infusion set with Lantern technology

Current insulin infusion sets are approved for only 2-3 days. The novel ConvaTec infusion set with Lantern technology is designed to extend infusion set wear time. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate the duration of wear for this set. This was a pilot safety study in adults with type 1 diabetes using tethered insulin pumps. Participants inserted the set and wore it for 10 days or until failure. Among 24 participants, two were excluded. Forty-five per cent of the sets lasted 10 days. Median wear time was 9.1 (7.1, 10.0) days. Among 12 premature failures, six (50%) involved adhesive failures, four (33%) hyperglycaemia unresponsive to correction, one (8%) hyperglycaemia with ketones and one (8%) infection. Average CGM glucose per day of infusion set wear showed a statistically significant increase over time, while total daily insulin over the same period did not change. In this pilot study, the duration of wear for the novel infusion set exceeded previously reported commercial sets (P < .001). This extended wear technology may eventually allow for a combined glucose sensor and infusion set.     

An observational study comparing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and insulin glargine in children with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: The advantages of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or insulin glargine have been demonstrated both in adult and paediatric diabetic patients; however, as no data comparing these two approaches during childhood are available, we have examined the efficacy of these two intensive approaches. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 36 diabetic children, who had changed their previous insulin regimen [with isophane insulin (NPH) at bedtime] because of HbA1c levels >8.0%. Twenty patients underwent CSII, while the other 16 (significantly younger for age) started insulin glargine at bedtime. RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months, CSII-treated patients showed a significant reduction in HbA1c values from 8.5 +/- 1.8 to 7.4 +/- 1.1% and to 7.6 +/- 1.2%, respectively. The insulin requirement significantly decreased from 0.93 +/- 0.2 IU/kg to 0.73 +/- 0.2 IU/kg of body weight and to 0.74 +/- 0.15 IU/kg of body weight, respectively, while no significant differences were observed for BMI SDS, fructosamine and severe hypoglycaemic events. The patients treated with glargine showed a small decline in HbA1c values from 8.9 +/- 1.7 to 8.3 +/- 0.9% (not significant) in the first 6 months of treatment and to 8.2 +/- 0.9% after 12 months. CONCLUSION: The basal insulin supplementation can be supplied effectively in children with type 1 diabetes by either CSII or insulin glargine. As previously reported for adults, it is confirmed that CSII is the best current intensive approach aimed to the improvement of glycaemic control.     

Multiple mealtime administration of biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus traditional basal-bolus human insulin treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of multiple mealtime injections of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (30% fast-acting insulin aspart in the formulation, BIAsp30) to traditional basal-bolus human insulin regimen (HI) on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-three patients (eight women and 15 men) aged 44.8 (20.6-62.5) years (median and range) with a diabetes duration of 19.5 (1.6-44.6) years completed the study. All eligible patients were randomly assigned to BIAsp30 thrice daily supplied with bedtime NPH insulin when necessary, or basal-bolus HI for 12 weeks and then switched to the alternative regimen for another 12 weeks. The insulin dose adjustments were made by patients on the basis of advice from a diabetes nurse. At end of each treatment period, the patients attended two profile days, 1 week apart for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments. HbA1C was measured at baseline and at the end of each treatment period. A seven-point self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) was obtained twice weekly. RESULTS: In comparison with HI, multiple mealtime injections of BIAsp30 resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1C[HI vs. BIAsp30 (%, geometric mean and range): 8.6 (7.4-11.4) vs. 8.3 (6.7-9.8), p = 0.013]. During treatment with BIAsp30, nighttime glycaemic control was significantly improved. Day-to-day variation in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and the rate of hypoglycaemia were not increased with BIAsp30 compared with HI. Conclusions: In type 1 diabetics, multiple mealtime administration of BIAsp30 compared with traditional basal-bolus human insulin treatment significantly improves long-term glycaemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Despite a higher proportion of intermediate-acting insulin, thrice-daily injections with BIAsp30 do not increase the day-to-day variations in insulin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.     

Canagliflozin improves glycaemic control over 28 days in subjects with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled on insulin

Aim: Canagliflozin is a sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that is being investigated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, 28‐day study conducted at two sites, in 29 subjects with T2DM not optimally controlled on insulin and up to one oral antihyperglycaemic agent. Subjects were treated with canagliflozin 100 mg QD or 300 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic characteristics and pharmacodynamic effects of canagliflozin were examined. Glucose malabsorption following a 75‐g oral glucose challenge was also examined. Results: Canagliflozin pharmacokinetics were dose‐dependent, and the elimination half‐life ranged from 12 to 15 h. After 28 days, the renal threshold for glucose excretion was reduced; urinary glucose excretion was increased; and A1C, fasting plasma glucose and body weight decreased in subjects administered canagliflozin (A1C reductions: 0.19% with placebo, 0.73% with 100 mg QD, 0.92% with 300 mg BID; body weight changes: 0.03 kg increase with placebo, 0.73 kg reduction with 100 mg QD, 1.19 kg reduction with 300 mg BID). Glucose malabsorption was not observed with canagliflozin treatment. There were no deaths, serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemic episodes. The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups. There were no clinically meaningful changes in routine laboratory safety tests, vital signs or electrocardiograms. Conclusion: In subjects receiving insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic therapy, canagliflozin was well tolerated without evidence for glucose malabsorption, had pharmacokinetic characteristics consistent with once‐daily dosing, and improved glycaemic control.     

Single‐dose euglycaemic clamp studies demonstrating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity between MK‐1293 insulin glargine and originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in subjects with type 1 diabetes and healthy subjects

Aims

MK‐1293 is an insulin glargine that has an amino acid sequence identical to that of Lantus, the originator insulin glargine. Two euglycaemic clamp studies, 1 in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 1 in healthy subjects, were conducted to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity between MK‐1293 and Lantus commercially procured in both the European Union (EU‐Lantus) and the USA (US‐Lantus).

Materials and Methods

Both studies were single‐dose, randomized, double‐blind, single‐centre, crossover studies with ≥7 days between dosing periods. A 2‐treatment, 4‐period replicate crossover study in T1D subjects (N = 76) compared the PK and PD of MK‐1293 to EU‐Lantus for 30 hours after dosing. A 3‐period crossover study in healthy subjects (N = 109) compared the PK and PD of MK‐1293, EU‐Lantus and US‐Lantus for 24 hours after dosing. In both studies, all subjects received single 0.4 units/kg subcutaneous doses of MK‐1293 or Lantus in all dosing periods. Pharmacokinetic assessment was based on LC‐MS/MS‐based measurement of the major insulin glargine metabolite (M1) and PD was characterized using the euglycaemic clamp platform.

Results

In both studies, pre‐specified similarity criteria were met between MK‐1293 and Lantus for comparison of PK (AUC_0‐24 and C_max of M1) and PD (GIR‐AUC_0‐24, GIR‐AUC_0‐12, GIR‐AUC_12‐24, and GIR_max) primary endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusion

Based on comparative assessment in both T1D and healthy subjects, it can be concluded that the PK and PD properties of MK‐1293 are highly similar to those of Lantus. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02059174).     

A reduction in severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes in a randomized crossover study of continuous intraperitoneal compared with subcutaneous insulin infusion

Aim: Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with the DiaPort system using regular insulin was compared to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using insulin Lispro, to investigate the frequency of hypoglycemia, blood glucose control, quality of life, and safety.
Methods: In this open, randomized, controlled, cross-over, multinational, 12-month study, 60 type 1 diabetic patients with frequent hypoglycemia and/or HbA1c > 7.0% with CSII were randomized to CIPII or CSII. The aim was to obtain the best possible blood glucose while avoiding hypoglycemia.
Results: The frequency of any hypoglycemia was similar (CIPII 118.2 (SD 82.6) events / patient year, CSII 115.8 (SD 75.7) p = 0.910). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia with CSII was more than twice the one with CIPII (CIPII 34.8 events / 100 patient years, CSII 86.1, p = 0.013). HbA1c, mean blood glucose, and glucose fluctuations were not statistically different. Treatment-related severe complications occurred mainly during CIPII: port infections (0.47 events / patient year), abdominal pain (0.21 events / patient year), insulin underdelivery (0.14 events / patient year). Weight gain was greater with CSII (+ 1.5 kg vs. − 0.1 kg, p = 0.013), quality of life better with CIPII.
Conclusions: In type 1 diabetes CIPII with DiaPort reduces the number of severe episodes of hypoglycemia and improves quality of life with no weight gain. Because of complications, indications for CIPII must be strictly controlled. CIPII with DiaPort is an alternative therapy when CSII is not fully successful and provides an easy method of intraperitoneal therapy.     

Greater early postprandial suppression of endogenous glucose production and higher initial glucose disappearance is achieved with fast‐acting insulin aspart compared with insulin aspart

Aim

To investigate the mechanisms behind the lower postprandial glucose (PPG) concentrations achieved with fast‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) than with insulin aspart (IAsp).

Materials and methods

In a randomized, double‐blind, crossover trial, 41 people with type 1 diabetes received identical subcutaneous single faster aspart and IAsp doses (individualized for each participant), together with a standardized mixed meal (including 75 g carbohydrate labelled with [1‐¹³C] glucose). PPG turnover was determined by the triple‐tracer meal method using continuous, variable [6‐³H] glucose and [6,6‐²H₂] glucose infusion.

Results

Insulin exposure within the first hour was 32% greater with faster aspart than with IAsp (treatment ratio faster aspart/IAsp 1.32 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.18;1.48]; P < .001), leading to a 0.59‐mmol/L non‐significantly smaller PPG increment at 1 hour (ΔPG_1h; treatment difference faster aspart–IAsp ?0.59 mmol/L [95% CI –1.19; 0.01]; P = .055). The trend towards reduced ΔPG_1h with faster aspart was attributable to 12% greater suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP; treatment ratio 1.12 [95% CI 1.01; 1.25]; P = .040) and 23% higher glucose disappearance (1.23 [95% CI 1.05; 1.45]; P = .012) with faster aspart than with IAsp during the first hour. Suppression of free fatty acid levels during the first hour was 36% greater for faster aspart than for IAsp (1.36 [95% CI 1.01;1.88]; P = .042).

Conclusions

The trend towards improved PPG control with faster aspart vs IAsp in this study was attributable to both greater early suppression of EGP and stimulation of glucose disappearance.     

Faster insulin action is associated with improved glycaemic outcomes during closed‐loop insulin delivery and sensor‐augmented pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between insulin pharmacodynamics and glycaemic outcomes during closed‐loop insulin delivery and sensor‐augmented pump therapy. We retrospectively analysed data from a multicentre randomized control trial involving 32 adults with type 1 diabetes receiving day‐and‐night closed‐loop insulin delivery and sensor‐augmented pump therapy over 12 weeks. We estimated time‐to‐peak insulin action (t _{max, IA} ) and insulin sensitivity ( S _I ) during both interventions, and correlated these with demographic factors and glycaemic outcomes. During both interventions, t _{max, IA} was positively correlated with pre‐ and post‐intervention HbA1c (r = 0.50‐0.52, P < .01) and mean glucose (r = 0.45‐0.62, P < .05), and inversely correlated with time sensor glucose, which was in target range 3.9 to 10 mmol/L (r = ?0.64 to ?0.47, P < .05). Increased body mass index was associated with higher t _{max, I} and lower S _I (both P < .05). During closed‐loop insulin delivery, t _{max, IA} was positively correlated with glucose variability ( P < .05). Faster insulin action is associated with improved glycaemic control during closed‐loop insulin delivery and sensor‐augmented pump therapy.