Rizatriptan efficacy in ICHD-II pure menstrual migraine and menstrually related migraine

Objective.— To examine the efficacy of rizatriptan for the treatment of pure menstrual migraine (PMM). Background.— In 2004, the International Headache Society proposed new research criteria for menstrual migraine (International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD‐II]). Two subtypes were defined: PMM, in which attacks occur exclusively with menstruation, and menstrually related migraine (MRM), in which attacks may also occur at other times of the cycle. Methods.— The 2 protocols (MM1 and MM2) were identical randomized, double‐blind studies. Adult patients with ICHD‐II menstrual migraine were assigned to either rizatriptan 10‐mg tablet or placebo (2:1). Patients were to treat a single menstrual migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. This prospectively planned substudy pooled data from patients with a diagnosis of PMM from both studies. The primary substudy endpoint was 2‐hour pain relief. Efficacy data were summarized for patients with a diagnosis of MRM. Results.— Of 707 (MM1: 357, MM2: 350) patients treated in the study, 146 patients (MM1: 81, MM2: 65) had a diagnosis of PMM. The percentage of patients reporting 2‐hour pain relief was significantly greater for rizatriptan than for placebo for both PMM (73% vs 50%, P = .006) and MRM subgroups (71% vs 52%, P < .001). Most other efficacy endpoints favored rizatriptan compared with placebo in patients with either PMM or MRM. Conclusion.— Rizatriptan 10 mg was superior to placebo for the treatment of PMM, as measured by 2‐hour pain relief. Rizatriptan was also effective for the treatment of MRM and for relief of migraine‐associated symptoms for both headache subtypes.     

Opioid control of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis cyclically fails in menstrual migraine

To assess the biological correlates of the precipitation of migraine attacks in the perimenstrual period, plasma beta-endorphin (beta-EP) and cortisol responses to naloxone (8 mg iv) and corticotropin releasing hormone (100 micrograms iv) were evaluated in both the follicular phase and the premenstrual period in 7 patients suffering from menstrual migraine and in 7 healthy, asymptomatic control volunteers. In the controls, naloxone evoked a significant release of both beta-EP (F = 5.86, p less than 0.002) and cortisol (F = 4.43, p less than 0.008), independently of the menstrual cycle phase (F = 0.31 and 1.04, for beta-EP and cortisol, respectively). Menstrual migraine patients, on the other hand, showed a significant hormone response only in the follicular phase, not in the premenstrual period. Corticotropin releasing hormone significantly increased beta-EP and cortisol in both the controls and the menstrual migraine patients, independently of the menstrual cycle phase. In both the naloxone and corticotropin releasing hormone testings, the basal beta-EP levels measured in the premenstrual period were lower than those observed in the follicular phase (p less than 0.02). These data demonstrate a cyclical, premenstrual dysfunction of the hypothalamic control exerted by opioids on the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Impairment of this fundamental adaptive mechanism (involved in stress responses and in pain control) could establish a causal relationship between menstrual-related migraine attacks and premenstrual opioid hyposensitivity.     

The association of menstrual migraine with the premenstrual syndrome

To investigate the comorbidity of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and menstrual migraine, the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) was prospectively administered for two consecutive menstrual cycles to 22 patients with menstrual migraine, 12 cases with migraine without aura and 15 patients with PMS. MDQ scores varied throughout the menstrual cycle in each patient group, the wider changes being shown by patients with PMS. Fourteen menstrual migraine patients and 4 migraine without aura patients achieved diagnostic criteria for PMS over two menstrual cycles. In these patients MDQ scores did not differ from PMS sufferers at any stage of the menstrual cycle. The premenstrual increase of each cluster of PMS symptoms was identical in menstrual migraine and PMS subjects with the exception of negative affect. We suggest that PMS symptoms should be taken into account in the IHS diagnostic criteria for menstrual migraine.     

Sensitization of the trigeminal sensory system during different stages of the rat estrous cycle: implications for menstrual migraine

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the sensitization of the trigeminal system changes after dural activation of the trigeminal nerve during different stages of the rat estrous cycle. BACKGROUND: The specific mechanisms through which ovarian hormones trigger menstrual migraine are currently unknown. Past animal studies have suggested that the response properties of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) may change during the different phases of the rat estrous cycle, but none have been performed in an experimental paradigm for migraine headache. METHODS: Sixty-one cycling female Sprague-Dawley rats were used for these experiments. The stage of the estrous cycle of each animal was identified by examination of the cellular morphology of vaginal lavage. The animals were anesthetized and a 7 mm portion of the skull was removed that was centered over the sagittal sinus. A tungsten electrode was used to record from neurons in the TNC or CI-CIII regions. Only neurons that had both dural and cutaneous receptive fields were used for these experiments. Facial receptive field sizes (RFS) were mapped and neurophysiologic response properties of the TNC/CI-CIII neurons to cutaneous and dural stimuli was ascertained before and after application of capsaicin to the dura. One-way and repeated measure analysis of variance were used to compare changes in RFS and response properties of TNC/CI-CIII neurons from animals during different stages of the rat estrous cycle. RESULTS: When data were analyzed individually for each stage, there was greater enlargement of cutaneous receptive fields and enhanced sensitivity of the trigeminal system to cutaneous stimuli during proestrus as compared to metestrus and diestrus after dural activation with capsaicin (P values <.05). When data were pooled from stages with similar hormonal milieus, the percent change in the response magnitude of TNC neurons to electrical stimulation of the dura was greater and receptive field enlargement was larger from the proestrous/estrous group compared to those from the metestrous/diestrous group after administration of capsaicin (P values <.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is enhanced sensitization of the trigeminal system during the later halves of proestrus and estrus, which represent stages of the rat estrous cycle during and immediately following an abrupt decline in ovarian hormones. If similar changes occur during the human menstrual cycle these results could have important implications for menstrual migraine.     

Platelet serotonin pathway in menstrual migraine

In order to understand the possible 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) anomalies in migraine, particularly in the period before the headache attack, we compared the levels of 5HT, its stable metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA) and platelet monoaminoxidase (MAO) activity in patients with menstrual migraine with those of healthy female controls. In every subject, blood samples were drawn during both follicular and late luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. In controls, platelet 5HT levels remained stable, whereas 5HIAA levels and MAO activity were higher in the luteal than in the follicular phase, suggesting an increased catabolism of 5HT which occurs physiologically just before menses. In menstrual migraine 5HIAA levels and MAO activity showed similar changes with higher values in the luteal than in the follicular phase. The luteal phase values were significantly higher than those of controls. Also, and in contrast to controls, 5HT levels decreased in the luteal phase. These data suggest that 5HT availability is reduced in menstrual migraine, possibly due to an increased catabolism and/or to a reduced synthesis, and hence predisposes patients to migraine attacks.     

Hormones, menstrual distress, and migraine across the phases of the menstrual cycle

OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of the present study were to (1) contrast reproductive hormone levels and ratings of menstrual distress of female migraineurs with those of a control group in each menstrual cycle phase, (2) examine correlations between hormone levels and migraine frequency, severity, and migraine-related disability, and (3) examine correlations between menstrual distress and migraine frequency, severity, and migraine-related disability. A secondary objective was to evaluate the validity of a migraine disability measure modified to reflect 7-day recall. BACKGROUND: Further controlled, prospective study is needed regarding the temporal relationships between reproductive hormones at each stage of the menstrual cycle and fluctuations in migraine activity across the cycle. METHODS: Twenty-three women (17 with migraine, 6 control participants) completed laboratory hormone assays and measures of menstrual distress and disability at each phase of one menstrual cycle, and monitored their headache activity daily during the same cycle. Results.-The migraine group evidenced lower premenstrual luteinizing hormone and more menstrual distress symptoms at each phase of the menstrual cycle. Hormones were associated with migraine activity and disability within cycle phases, and across phases in a time-lagged manner. Menstrual distress was associated with ovulatory phase migraine activity and with migraine-related disability across the menstrual cycle. A retrospective 7-day migraine disability measure appeared to be a consistently valid index. CONCLUSIONS: Both reproductive hormones and menstrually related distress appear to predict migraine activity and disability. These associations were evident not only for perimenstrual migraine, but also for migraine at each phase of the menstrual cycle.     

Changes of neuroendocrine axes in patients with menstrual migraine

Menstrual migraine (MM) is a menstrually related disorder (MRD) characterized by several symptoms in common with premenstrual syndrome (PMS). It has been hypothesized that in both MM and PMS hormonal cyclicity could change the balance of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators like monoamine and opioid. In this article we analyze all the data collected by our group on the central opioid tonus and the adrenergic and serotonergic systems in patients affected by menstrual migraine.     

Rizatriptan for the acute treatment of ICHD-II proposed menstrual migraine: two prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies

These are the first prospective studies to use criteria for menstrual migraine proposed in the 2004 revision of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) to examine the efficacy of rizatriptan for treatment of a menstrual attack. Two identical protocols (MM1 and MM2) were randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies. Adult women with ICHD-II menstrual migraine were assigned to either rizatriptan 10-mg tablet or placebo in a 2 : 1 ratio. Patients treated a single menstrual migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The primary end-point was 2-h pain relief and the secondary end-point was 24-h sustained pain relief. A total of 707 patients (MM1 357, MM2 350) treated a menstrual migraine attack. The percentage of patients reporting 2-h pain relief was significantly greater for rizatriptan than for placebo (MM1 70% vs. 53%, MM2 73% vs. 50%), as was the percentage of patients reporting 24-h sustained pain relief (MM1 46% vs. 33%; MM2 46% vs. 33%). Rizatriptan 10 mg was effective for the treatment of ICHD-II menstrual migraine, as measured by 2-h pain relief and 24-h sustained pain relief.     

Efficacy of rizatriptan for menstrual migraine in an early intervention model: a prospective subgroup analysis of the rizatriptan TAME (Treat A Migraine Early) studies

OBJECTIVE: A prospective subgroup analysis of the TAME (Treat A Migraine Early) studies examined the efficacy of rizatriptan in patients treating a menstrual migraine attack. METHODS: Both TAME studies were randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind. Adults with migraine were assigned (2:1) to either rizatriptan 10-mg tablet or placebo. Patients were instructed to treat within 1 hour of migraine onset and when the pain was mild. The primary endpoint was 2-hour pain freedom. The diagnosis of menstrual migraine was established according to the revised 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria. Data from both studies were pooled for logistic regression analyses. A test for interaction was performed to compare rates of 2-hour pain freedom between patients treating a menstrual and non-menstrual attack. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients (63 in the rizatriptan group and 31 in the placebo group) met IHS criteria for menstrual migraine and treated a menstrual attack. The percentage of patients reporting 2-hour pain freedom was significantly greater for rizatriptan than for placebo (63.5% vs 29.0%; odds ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 11.9; P = .002) in those treating a menstrual attack. In those treating with rizatriptan, the percentage of patients with 2-hour pain freedom did not statistically differ between those treating a menstrual or non-menstrual migraine attack (63.5% vs 57.5%; P = .454). CONCLUSION: Rizatriptan 10 mg was effective for the treatment of menstrual migraine in an early intervention model, as measured by 2-hour pain freedom. Rates of 2-hour pain freedom were comparable for patients treating menstrual and non-menstrual migraine attacks with rizatriptan.     

Ovarian hormones and migraine headache: understanding mechanisms and pathogenesis--part 2

Migraine headache is strongly influenced by reproductive events that occur throughout the lifespan of women. Each of these reproductive events has a different "hormonal milieu," which might modulate the clinical course of migraine headache. Estrogen and progesterone can be preventative or provocative for migraine headache under different circumstances depending on their absolute serum levels, constancy of exposure, and types of estrogen/progesterone derivatives. Attacks of migraine with and without aura respond differently to changes in ovarian hormones. Clearly a greater knowledge of ovarian hormones and their effect on migraine is essential to a greater understanding of the mechanisms and pathogenesis of migraine headache.     

The impact of extended-cycle vaginal ring contraception on migraine aura: a retrospective case series

Objective.— To determine whether extended‐cycle dosing of an ultralow dose vaginal ring contraceptive decreases frequency of migraine aura and prevents menstrual related migraine (MRM). Background.— Many women are denied therapy with combined hormonal contraceptives due to published guidelines that recommend against their use in migraine with aura (MwA). The concern is that these products might further elevate the risk of ischemic stroke that accompanies aura. Stroke risk has been reported to vary directly with aura frequency, and aura frequency in turn has been shown to have a direct relationship to estrogen concentration. With the evolution of increasingly lower dosed combined hormonal contraceptives, we now have formulations that – provided that ovulation is inhibited – result in lower peak levels of estrogen than the concentrations attained during the native menstrual cycle. These formulations would thus be expected to result in a lower frequency of migraine aura. Furthermore, as extended‐cycle therapy eliminates monthly estrogen withdrawals, this therapy would likewise be expected to prevent MRM. Methods.— This pilot study is an institutional review board‐approved retrospective database review. We queried our database of 830 women seen in a subspecialty menstrual migraine clinic to identify women who met all inclusion criteria: (1) current history of MwA; (2) confirmed diagnosis of MRM; and (3) treatment with extended‐cycle dosing of a transvaginal ring contraceptive containing 0.120 mg etonogestrel/15 µg ethinyl estradiol. Standardized calendars that specifically document bleeding patterns, headache details, and occurrence of aura are required of all patients in this clinic. Results.— Twenty‐eight women met study criteria, none of whom were smokers. Of these, 5 discontinued use of etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol within the first month, leaving 23 evaluable subjects. At baseline, subjects averaged 3.23 migraine auras/month (range: 0.1‐12). With extended dosing of the vaginal ring contraceptive, median frequency was reduced to 0.23 auras per month following treatment after a mean observation of 7.8 months (P < .0005). No subject reported an increase in aura frequency. On this regimen, MRM was eliminated in 91.3% of the evaluable subjects. Conclusion.— In this sample of women with both MwA and MRM, use of an extended‐cycle vaginal ring contraceptive was associated with a reduced frequency of migraine aura and with resolution of MRM. This cannot be extrapolated to suggest that stroke risk in MwA will be similarly reduced. Studies to evaluate this relationship are warranted.     

Elimination of menstrual-related migraine beneficially impacts chronification and medication overuse

Objectives.— This study seeks to determine whether menstrual‐related migraine (MRM) has a discrete, attributable impact on migraine chronicity and medication overuse. Background.— Menstrual‐related migraine can be a disabling headache on its own; but when seen in headache clinics, it is often enmeshed in the setting of chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH). Whereas nonspecific migraine preventives bestow their benefit uniformly, hormonal preventives (HPs)—when they are successful—address a discrete hormonal mechanism. They confer no known benefit to migraines that are not hormonally triggered. This selective property of HPs could potentially isolate MRM and segregate its effect on the overall clinical picture. Methods.— This is a retrospective review of 229 consecutive women seen in follow‐up for hormonal prevention of MRM at an academic headache center. Patients kept standardized diaries from which separate menstrual‐week (MW) and non‐menstrual week (nonMW) headache indices were calculated and compared. Resolution of MRM was defined by reduction of the MW headache index to a score not exceeding the nonMW headache indices. Consumption of all acute and preventive agents used in the preceding month was tallied. We performed post‐treatment comparisons of medication usage and headache characteristics among subjects in whom MRM was resolved and those in whom it was not resolved. Results.— At baseline, CM was present in 92% of subjects, 72% of whom also met criteria for MOH. Resolution of MRM was achieved in 81% of subjects who were compliant with HP and was associated with reversion to episodic migraine (59% vs 18%, P < .001) and resolution of medication overuse (54% vs 20%, P < .001). Resolution of MRM was associated with significant decreases in per capita consumption of triptans, opioids, all acute agents, and migraine preventive medications. Conclusions.— Resolution of MRM correlated not only with conversion of CM to an episodic pattern, but also with a significant reduction in medication usage. It offers preliminary evidence that hormonal regimens may have a beneficial role in prevention of MRM.     

Characteristics of menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks in women with menstrually related migraine referred to headache centres

Aim of this study was to determine whether menstrual attacks differ from nonmenstrual attacks (NMA) as regards clinical features or response to abortive treatment in women affected by menstrually related migraine (MRM) referred to tertiary care centres. Sixty-four women with MRM were enrolled in a 2-month diary study. Perimenstrual attacks were split into three groups--premenstrual (PMA), menstrual (MA) and late menstrual (LMA)--and compared to nonmenstrual ones. Perimenstrual attacks were significantly longer than NMA. No other migraine attack features were found to differ between the various phases of the cycle. Migraine work-related disability was significantly greater in PMA and MA than in NMA. Acute attack treatment was less effective in perimenstrual attacks. Pain-free at 2 h after dosage was achieved in 13.5% of MA (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22, 0.76) vs. 32.9% of NMA. We concluded that, in MRM, perimenstrual attacks are longer and less responsive to acute attack treatment than NMA.     

Sumatriptan-naproxen sodium for menstrual migraine and dysmenorrhea: satisfaction, productivity, and functional disability outcomes

(Headache 2011;51:664‐673) Objective.— To evaluate the impact of a sumatriptan/naproxen sodium combination tablet on patient satisfaction, productivity, and functional disability in menstrual migraine treated during the mild pain phase of a single menstrual migraine attack associated with dysmenorrhea. Background.— Menstrual migraineurs with dysmenorrhea represent a unique patient population not previously studied. When health outcomes end points are analyzed alongside traditional efficacy end points in migraine studies, a more comprehensive and robust understanding of the many factors that may influence patients' choice of and adherence to pharmacological treatments for migraine is observed. Methods.— In 2 replicate, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials, participants with menstrual migraine and dysmenorrhea treated a single menstrual migraine attack with a single fixed‐dose tablet of sumatriptan 85 mg formulated with RT Technology? and naproxen sodium 500 mg (sumatriptan–naproxen sodium) or placebo. Results.— Participants randomized to sumatriptan–naproxen sodium were significantly more satisfied than those randomized to placebo at 24 hours post dose, as demonstrated by higher satisfaction subscale scores for efficacy (P < .001 for both studies), functionality (P = .003 for study 1; P < .001 for study 2), and ease of use (P = .027 for study 1; P = .011 for study 2). There was little bothersomeness of side effects associated with either treatment. Use of sumatriptan–naproxen sodium was also associated with lower reported “lost‐time equivalents” in work and leisure time (pooled analysis, P = .003) and lower rates of functional disability (P = .05, study 1; P < .001, study 2) compared with placebo. Conclusion.— A fixed‐dose combination tablet containing sumatriptan and naproxen sodium significantly improved patient satisfaction, productivity, and restoration of normal functioning in menstrual migraineurs with dysmenorrhea.     

Defining the relationship between ovarian hormones and migraine headache

OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine whether the attack characteristics of migraine differ between different intervals of the menstrual cycle; (2) To ascertain whether the "rate of change,"magnitude of change," or "total burden" of urinary hormone metabolites correlates with headaches outcome measures during different intervals of the menstrual cycle. BACKGROUND: The mechanisms through which migraines are influenced by ovarian hormones remain unclear. No previous studies until now have identified "hormonally defined" time intervals within the female menstrual cycle and compared headache outcome measures among these intervals in female migraineurs. METHOD: Daily headache diary data were obtained from 21 female migraineurs during three native menstrual cycles. Daily urine samples were collected and later assayed for estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Seven 3-day time intervals were identified within each menstrual cycle based on urine hormone measurements. Primary (headache index) and secondary (disability index, headache severity, and headache frequency) outcome measures were compared between intervals using the mixed model approach. "Rates of change,"magnitude of change," and the "total burden" of ovarian hormones were estimated from urine hormone metabolites and correlated with headache outcome measures. RESULTS: The headache index was significantly different across different intervals of the menstrual cycle (P values <.001) and was higher during menstrual intervals (first 6 days of the menstrual cycle) than during mid-cycle and mid-luteal intervals (P < .002). Similarly, secondary outcome measures were highest during the menstrual intervals. "Higher burdens" of urinary progesterone metabolites were positively correlated with headache outcome measures during the luteal intervals of the menstrual cycle. "Rates of change" and the "magnitude of change" of urinary hormone metabolites did not correlate with headache outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine headache is more severe, disabling, and frequent during the menstrual intervals of the female reproductive cycle than during mid-luteal or mid-cycle intervals. Progesterone metabolites may play a role in modulating migraine headaches during luteal intervals of the menstrual cycle.     

Genetic association and gene expression studies suggest that genetic variants in the SYNE1 and TNF genes are related to menstrual migraine

Background

Menstrual migraine (MM) encompasses pure menstrual migraine (PMM) and menstrually-related migraine (MRM). This study was aimed at investigating genetic variants that are potentially related to MM, specifically undertaking genotyping and mRNA expression analysis of the ESR1, PGR, SYNE1 and TNF genes in MM cases and non-migraine controls.

Methods

A total of 37 variants distributed across 14 genes were genotyped in 437 DNA samples (282 cases and 155 controls). In addition levels of gene expression were determined in 74 cDNA samples (41 cases and 33 controls). Association and correlation analysis were performed using Plink and RStudio.

Results

SNPs rs3093664 and rs9371601 in TNF and SYNE1 genes respectively, were significantly associated with migraine in the MM population (p = 0.008; p = 0.009 respectively). Analysis of qPCR results found no significant difference in levels of gene expression between cases and controls. However, we found a significant correlation between the expression of ESR1 and SYNE1, ESR1 and PGR and TNF and SYNE1 in samples taken during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Conclusions

Our results show that SNPs rs9371601 and rs3093664 in the SYNE1 and TNF genes respectively, are associated with MM. The present study also provides strong evidence to support the correlation of ESR1, PGR, SYNE1 and TNF gene expression in MM.     

Frovatriptan <Emphasis Type="Italic">vs.</Emphasis> transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium for the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine

Acute treatment of menstrual migraine (MM) attacks is often incomplete and unsatisfactory, and perimenstrual prophylaxis with triptans, oestrogen supplementation or naproxen sodium may be needed for decreasing frequency and severity of the attack. In this pilot, open-label, non-randomised, parallel group study we evaluated, in 38 women with a history of MM, the efficacy of frovatriptan (n=14) 2.5 mg per os or transdermal oestrogens (n=10) 25 μg or naproxen sodium (n=14) 500 mg per os once-daily for the short-term prevention of MM. All treatments were administered in the morning for 6 days, beginning 2 days before the expected onset of menstrual headache. All women were asked to fill in a diary card, in the absence of (baseline) and under treatment, in order to score headache severity. All women reported at least one episode of MM at baseline. During treatment all patients taking transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium and 13 out of the 14 patients (93%) taking frovatriptan had at least one migraine attack (p=0.424). Daily incidence of migraine was significantly (p=0.045) lower under frovatriptan than under transdermal oestrogens or NS. At baseline, the overall median score of headache severity was 4.6, 4.2 and 4.3 in the group subsequently treated with frovatriptan, transdermal oestrogens and naproxen sodium, respectively (p=0.819). During treatment the median score was significantly lower under frovatriptan (2.5) than under transdermal oestrogens (3.0) and naproxen sodium (3.9, p=0.049). This was evident also for each single day of observation (p=0.016). Among treatments differences were particularly evident for the subgroup of patients with true MM (n=22) and for frovatriptan vs. naproxen sodium. This study suggests that short-term prophylaxis of MM with frovatriptan may be more effective than that based on transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium.     

Characteristics of migraine attacks and responses to almotriptan treatment: a comparison of menstrually related and nonmenstrually related migraines

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical characteristics of menstrually related migraines (MRMs) and nonmenstrually related migraines (nonMRMs) and to investigate the efficacy of almotriptan in the treatment of these migraine subtypes. DESIGN/METHODS: These are post hoc analyses of data from the AXERT Early miGraine Intervention Study (AEGIS), a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial that evaluated adults with IHS-defined migraine with and without aura. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treat 3 consecutive headaches with almotriptan 12.5 mg or matching placebo at the first sign of headache typical of their usual migraine, at any level of pain intensity but within 1 hour of onset. MRMs were defined as those occurring +/-2 days of the first day of menstrual flow. Post hoc analyses to describe headache characteristics pooled all migraine attacks experienced by patients who reported > or = 1 menses during the study regardless of assigned treatment group. The post hoc efficacy analyses included outcomes of almotriptan treatment compared with placebo treatment for all migraines in patients with a menstrual record. RESULTS: Of the 275 women in the AEGIS intent-to-treat population, 190 (69.1%; 97 almotriptan, 93 placebo; aged 18-54 years) reported > or = 1 menses during the trial. Of the 506 migraines reported by these patients, 95 (18.8%) occurred +/-2 days of the first day of menstrual flow and were defined as MRM. Aura was associated with 11.7% of MRM and 15.0% of nonMRM. Allodynia-associated symptoms were present with 62.8% of MRM and 57.0% of nonMRM. Prior to treatment, 19.1% of MRM were associated with normal functional ability, 68.1% with disturbed functional ability, and 12.8% required bed rest compared with 18.9%, 68.8%, and 12.3%, respectively, of nonMRM. Pretreatment pain intensity was mild in 40.0%, moderate in 47.4%, and severe in 12.6% of MRM compared with 43.6%, 47.2%, and 9.2%, respectively, of nonMRM. Almotriptan treatment efficacy outcomes for MRM vs nonMRM, respectively, were: 2-hour pain relief, 77.4% vs 68.3%; 2-hour pain free, 35.4% vs 35.9%; and sustained pain free, 22.9% vs 23.8%. Almotriptan was similarly effective in relieving migraine-associated symptoms and improving functional disability associated with both MRM and nonMRM. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to treatment, the presence of migraine-associated characteristics including aura, allodynia-associated symptoms, photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea were similar for both MRM and nonMRM attacks. The pretreatment levels of pain intensity and functional disability were likewise similar across the migraine subtypes. Almotriptan was equally effective in the treatment of both MRM and nonMRM attacks and was associated with an adverse event profile that was similar to placebo treatment.     

Intracellular and plasma magnesium in familial hemiplegic migraine and migraine with and without aura

Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is an autosomal dominant type of migraine and probably represents the most extreme end of migraine with aura. Reduced magnesium facilitates the development of spreading depression and possibly aura. Cellular magnesium levels are under genetic control. We hypothesized that FHM patients would have significantly reduced intracellular magnesium levels. We determined intracellular and plasma magnesium levels in blood of 38 afflicted and 11 non-afflicted members of three families with FHM and, in 32 migraine patients (9 with and 23 without aura) and 32 age and sex matched healthy controls. We found no significant differences between the magnesium levels in the five study groups. We conclude that reduced blood magnesium is unlikely to be related to migraine pathophysiology.     

Repeated oxytocin prevents central sensitization by regulating synaptic plasticity via oxytocin receptor in a chronic migraine mouse model

BackgroundCentral sensitization is one of the characters of chronic migraine (CM). Aberrant synaptic plasticity can induce central sensitization. Oxytocin (OT), which is a hypothalamic hormone, plays an important antinociceptive role. However, the antinociceptive effect of OT and the underlying mechanism in CM remains unclear. Therefore, we explored the effect of OT on central sensitization in CM and its implying mechanism, focusing on synaptic plasticity.MethodsA CM mouse model was established by repeated intraperitoneal injection of nitroglycerin (NTG). Von Frey filaments and radiant heat were used to measure the nociceptive threshold. Repeated intranasal OT and intraperitoneal L368,899, an oxytocin receptor (OTR) antagonist, were administered to investigate the effect of OT and the role of OTR. The expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and c-fos were measured to assess central sensitization. N-methyl D-aspartate receptor subtype 2B (NR2B)-regulated synaptic-associated proteins and synaptic plasticity were explored by western blot (WB), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and Golgi-Cox staining.ResultsOur results showed that the OTR expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) of CM mouse was significantly increased, and OTR was colocalized with the postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) in neurons. Repeated intranasal OT alleviated the NTG-induced hyperalgesia and prevented central sensitization in CM mouse. Additionally, the OT treatment inhibited the overexpression of phosphorylated NR2B and synaptic-associated proteins including PSD-95, synaptophysin-1 (syt-1), and synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (snap25) in the TNC of CM mouse and restored the abnormal synaptic structure. The protective effect of OT was prevented by L368,899. Furthermore, the expression of adenylyl cyclase 1 (AC1)/ protein kinase A (PKA)/ phosphorylation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein (pCREB) pathway was depressed by OT and restored by L368,899.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that repeated intranasal OT eliminates central sensitization by regulating synaptic plasticity via OTR in CM. The effect of OT has closely associated with the down-regulation of AC1/PKA/pCREB signaling pathway, which is activated in CM model. Repeated intranasal OT may be a potential candidate for CM prevention.