Variation of bispectral index under TIVA with propofol in a paediatric population

BACKGROUND: In this prospective observational study, we aim to explore the relationship between age and bispectral index (BIS) values at different plasma concentrations of propofol. METHODS: Fifty children aged from 3 to 15 yr were included. Anaesthesia was induced using a target-controlled infusion of propofol with the Kataria pharmacokinetic model together with a bolus of remifentanil followed by a continuous infusion rate at 0.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Target plasma propofol concentration was initially stabilized to 6 microg ml(-1) and continued for 6 min. The target was then decreased and stabilized to 4 microg ml(-1) and then to 2 microg ml(-1). BIS values, plasma propofol concentration, and EEG were continuously recorded. In order to explore the relationship between variations in propofol concentration and the EEG bispectrum, we used a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). Results are shown in median (range). RESULTS: We found no statistical difference between BIS values with propofol 6 microg ml(-1) [23 (12-40)] and 4 microg ml(-1) [28 (9-67)]. At 2 microg ml(-1), BIS was significantly different [52 (24-71)], but a significant correlation between the age of children and BIS values was found (r2=0.66; P<0.01). There was little change in children's position between 6 and 4 microg ml(-1) in the structure model of the MCA. From 4 to 2 microg ml(-1), the position of children moved only on axis 2. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed the difficulty to interpret BIS values because of the absence of significant change for higher plasma propofol concentration variation or because of the link with age for the lower plasma concentration.     

Closed-loop control of propofol anaesthesia using bispectral index: performance assessment in patients receiving computer-controlled propofol and manually controlled remifentanil infusions for minor surgery

Background. In a previous study we used the bispectral index(BIS)^TM for automatic control of propofol anaesthesia, usinga proportional-integral-differential control algorithm. As controlwas less than optimal in some patients, we revised the constantsof the control algorithm. The aim of the current study was tomeasure the performance of the revised system in patients undergoingminor surgery under propofol and remifentanil anaesthesia. Methods. Twenty adult patients scheduled for body surface surgerywere enrolled. Anaesthesia was manually induced with target-controlledinfusions (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil. After the startof surgery, when anaesthesia was clinically adequate, automaticcontrol of the propofol TCI was commenced using the revisedclosed-loop system. For patients 11–20, effect-site steeringwas also incorporated into the closed-loop control algorithm.Adequacy of anaesthesia during closed-loop control was assessedclinically, and by calculating the median performance error(MDPE), the median absolute performance error (MDAPE) and themean offset of the control variable. Results. The system provided adequate operating conditions andstable cardiovascular values in all patients during closed-loopcontrol. The mean MDPE and MDAPE were –0.42% and 5.63%,respectively. Mean offset of the BIS^TM from setpoint was –0.2.No patients reported awareness or recall of intraoperative events. Conclusions. The system was able to provide clinically adequateanaesthesia in all patients, with better accuracy of controlthan in the previous study. There was a tendency for more accuratecontrol in those patients in whom the control algorithm incorporatedeffect-site steering. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 737–41     

Clonidine decreases propofol requirements during anaesthesia: effect on bispectral index

Assessment of the effect of clonidine on depth of anaesthesiais difficult because clonidine combines analgesic, sedativeand direct haemodynamic effects. We thus evaluated the influenceof clonidine on the bispectral index (BIS) and its potentialdose-sparing effect on propofol. After induction of anaesthesiawith target-controlled infusion of propofol and obtaining anunchanged bispectral index (pre-BIS), clonidine 4 µg kg^–1or placebo was administered randomly to 50 patients in a double-blindmanner. Subsequently, if there was a decrease in BIS we reducedthe target concentration of propofol until pre-BIS was reached.The pre-BIS was maintained and a remifentanil infusion was addedduring surgery. The courses of the BIS, heart rate and bloodpressure were recorded and the total amounts of intra-operativepropofol and remifentanil were determined. Assessment of implicitmemory during anaesthesia was performed with an auditory implicitmemory test consisting of item sequences. Administration ofclonidine resulted in a decrease in the BIS from 45 (SD 4) to40 (6) (P<0.001), which allowed a reduction of propofol targetconcentration from 3.3 (0.6) to 2.7 (0.7) µg ml^–1(P<0.001) and measured propofol concentration from 2.9 (0.6)to 2.5 (0.7) µg ml^–1 (P=0.009) in order tomaintain the pre-BIS value. During subsequent surgery, propofolrequirements were reduced by 20% (P=0.002) in the clonidinegroup and a similar amount of remifentanil was used in eachgroup. The increase in anaesthetic depth given by clonidinecan therefore be measured with bispectral EEG analysis and allowsreduction of the propofol dose to achieve a specific depth ofanaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 627–32     

Measuring depth of anaesthesia using changes in directional connectivity: a comparison with auditory middle latency response and estimated bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia

General anaesthesia is associated with changes in connectivity between different regions of the brain, the assessment of which has the potential to provide a novel marker of anaesthetic effect. We propose an index that quantifies the strength and direction of information flow in electroencephalographic signals collected across the scalp, assess its performance in discriminating ‘wakefulness’ from ‘anaesthesia’, and compare it with estimated bispectral index and the auditory middle latency response. We used a step-wise slow induction of anaesthesia in 10 patients to assess graded changes in electroencephalographic directional connectivity at propofol effect-site concentrations of 2 μg.ml⁻¹, 3 μg.ml⁻¹ and 4 μg.ml⁻¹. For each stable effect-site concentration, connectivity was estimated from multichannel electroencephalograms using directed coherence, together with middle latency response and estimated bispectral index. We used a linear support vector machine classifier to compare the performance of the different electroencephalographic features in discriminating wakefulness from anaesthesia. We found a significant reduction in the strength of long-range connectivity (interelectrode distance > 10 cm) (p < 0.008), and a reversal of information flow from markedly postero-frontal to fronto-posterior (p < 0.006) between wakefulness and a propofol effect-site concentration of 2 μg.ml⁻¹. This then remained relatively constant as effect-site concentration increased, consistent with a step change in directed coherence with anaesthesia. This contrasted with the gradual change with increasing anaesthetic dose observed for estimated bispectral index and middle latency response. Directed coherence performed best in discriminating wakefulness from anaesthesia with an accuracy of 95%, indicating the potential of this new method (on its own or combined with others) for monitoring adequacy of anaesthesia.     

Relationship between bispectral index,auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points

Background. Many anaesthetists are deterred from using totali.v. anaesthesia because of uncertainty over the concentrationof propofol required to prevent awareness. We predicted bloodand effect-site concentrations of propofol at two clinical end-points:loss of consciousness and no response to a painful stimulus. Methods. Forty unpremedicated Caucasian patients were anaesthetizedwith i.v. propofol delivered by a Diprifusor target-controlledinfusion (TCI). Bispectral index (BIS) and auditory evoked potentialindex (AEPex) were measured and blood and effect-site propofolconcentrations were predicted. Logistic regression was usedto estimate population values for predicted blood and effect-sitepropofol concentrations at the clinical end-points and to correlatethese with BIS and AEPex. Results. The effect-site EC₅₀ at loss of consciousness was 2.8 µm ml^–1with an EC₀₅ and an EC₉₅ of 1.5 and 4.1 µm ml^–1,respectively. The predicted EC₅₀ when there was no responseto a tetanic stimulus was 5.2 µm ml^–1 withan EC₀₅ and an EC₉₅ of 3.1 and 7.2 µm ml^–1,respectively. Conclusions. Unconsciousness and lack of response to a painfulstimulus occur within a defined range of effect-site concentrations,predicted by Diprifusor TCI software. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 127–31     

Comparing the effects of stimulation and propofol infusion rate on implicit and explicit memory formation

Doubt remains about the conditions under which learning persistsdespite anaesthesia. This study investigated the relative importanceof dose of anaesthetic and stimulation for learning during propofolinfusion before surgery. Thirty-six patients were randomly assignedto three groups. Group 1 received two word lists (category examplesand nonsense words) during infusion of propofol to a targetconcentration of 2 µg ml^–1. Groups 2 and3 received the word lists during infusion of propofol 5 µg ml^–1.Group 2 received nonsense words before tracheal intubation andcategory examples during intubation; Group 3 heard categoryexamples before and nonsense words during intubation. Bispectralindex was recorded as a measure of depth of sedation/anaesthesia.We assessed explicit memory on recovery using a structured interviewand a recognition test. We assessed implicit memory using acategory generation test and a preference rating task. To establishbaseline, a control group of 12 patients completed the categorygeneration test without receiving the category examples duringanaesthesia. Overall, there was no evidence for learning duringpropofol infusion, though the category generation task showeda trend towards more implicit memory for words presented duringintubation than during anaesthesia. We conclude that learningdoes not occur during anaesthesia without surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 189–95     

Comparison of Alaris AEP index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia

Background. The Alaris AEP monitor^TM (Alaris, UK, version 1.4)is the first commercially available auditory evoked potential(AEP) monitor designed to estimate the depth of anaesthesia.It generates an ‘Alaris AEP index’ (AAI), whichis a dimensionless number scaled from 100 (awake) to 0. Thisstudy was designed to compare AAI and BIS^TM (Aspect, USA, versionXP) values at different levels of anaesthesia. Methods. Adult female patients were premedicated with diazepam0.15 mg kg^–1 orally on the morning of surgery. Electrodesfor BIS and Alaris AEP monitoring and a headphone to give auditorystimuli were applied as recommended by the manufacturers. Anaesthesiawas induced with remifentanil (0.4 µg kg^–1 min^–1)and a propofol target-controlled infusion (Diprifusor^TM TCI,AstraZeneca, Germany) to obtain a predicted concentration ofinitially 3.5 µg ml^–1. After loss of consciousnessthe patients were given 0.5 mg kg^–1 of atracurium. Aftertracheal intubation, remifentanil was given at 0.2 µgkg^–1 min^–1 and the propofol infusion was adjustedto obtain BIS target values of 30, 40, 50, and 60. AAI and BISvalues were recorded and matched with the predicted propofoleffect-site concentrations. Prediction probability was calculatedfor consciousness vs unconsciousness. Values are mean (SD). Results. Fifty female patients, 53 (15), range 18–78 yr,ASA I or II were studied. Mean values before induction of anaesthesiawere 95 (4), range 99–82 for BIS and 85 (12), range 99–55for AAI. With loss of eyelash reflex both values were significantlyreduced to 64 (13), range 83–39 for BIS (P<0.05) and61 (22), range 99–15 for AAI (P<0.05). The predictionprobability P_K for consciousness vs unconsciousness (i.e. lossof eyelash reflex) was better for BIS (P_K=0.99) than for AAI(P_K=0.79). At a BIS of 30, 40, 50, and 60 the correspondingAAI values were 15 (6), 20 (8), 28 (11), and 40 (16), and thesewere significantly different. Conclusions. During propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia a decreaseof the depth of anaesthesia as indicated by BIS monitoring isaccompanied by corresponding effects shown by the AAI. However,wide variation in the awake values and considerable overlapof AAI values between consciousness and unconsciousness, suggestsfurther improvement of the AAI system is required. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 336–40     

BIS guided sedation with propofol during spinal anaesthesia: influence of anaesthetic level on sedation requirement

Background. In this prospective, clinical study we tested thehypothesis whether two different doses of spinal administeredbupivacaine and accordingly, two different levels of spinalanaesthesia can affect the dose requirement of propofol duringBIS guided sedation. Methods. Fifty women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (high spinalgroup, HS) or transvaginal tape (TVT) procedure for urinaryincontinence (low spinal group, LS) under spinal anaesthesiawere enrolled to the study. In group HS, 17.5 mg and in groupLS, 7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine were given intrathecally.After 15 min to obtain the appropriate level of spinal anaesthesia,propofol infusion was started at a rate of 100 µg kg^–1min^–1 to reach a BIS level of less than 75 (onset time),and titrated to maintain the BIS value between 65 and 75. Propofolinfusion was stopped 45 min after placing the spinal to measurethe time to reach a BIS level of 90 (recovery time). Results. Median anaesthetic level was T3 (T1–4) in theHS group and T10 (T9-11) in the LS group. In both the HS andthe LS groups, onset time was 226 (47) vs 273 (48) s (P=0.001),recovery time was 234 (47) vs 202 (56) s (P=0.03), total doseof propofol was 2.17 (0.43) vs 3.14 (0.56) mg kg^–1 (P<0.001),respectively. Conclusion. A high spinal block obtained with hyperbaric bupivacaine17.5 mg was associated with a faster onset, delayed recoveryand lower doses of propofol sedation compared with a low spinalblock with 7.5 mg of the same drug.     

Bispectral index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia

Background. As very strong agreement has been reported betweenbispectral index (BIS) values measured from the occipital andfrontal skull areas, we compared BIS values measured from centraland parietal areas with those from frontal area to investigatewhether BIS is really a topographically dependent or topographicallyindependent variable. Methods. Twenty patients, ASA I–II, non-obese, aged 18–62yr and with no neurological disorders were enrolled. Based onthe 10–20 international landmarks, five silver dome electrodeswere positioned: F7, C3, P7, Cz (common reference) and Fp1 (ground).Using frontal (F7–Cz), central (C3–Cz) and parietal(P7–Cz) electrode montages, the corresponding BIS valueswere simultaneously recorded with an Aspect A-1000 monitor (softwarev3.12). The BIS values were recorded at the propofol concentrationallowing laryngeal mask insertion, which was maintained duringthe 10 min data collection period in absence of additional externalstimuli. Data were analysed using the Kruskall–Wallis,Wilcoxon paired sign with Bonferroni correction, Bland–Altmanand linear correlation tests. Results. At the predicted effect target propofol concentration4–8 µg ml^–1, the 10 min mean BIS (median [min–max])were 32 [20–44], 46 [28–68] and 58 [41–72]for the frontal, central and parietal leads, respectively. Differencesbetween these BIS recordings were statistically significant(P<0.0001, Kruskall–Wallis; P<0.005, Wilcoxon pairedsign test). Conclusions. The present results provide evidence that BIS indexis a topographically dependent variable in patients receivingpropofol anaesthesia.     

Cerebral haemodynamic changes during propofol-remifentanil or sevoflurane anaesthesia: transcranial Doppler study under bispectral index monitoring

Background. Sevoflurane or propofol–remifentanil-basedanaesthetic regimens represent modern techniques for neurosurgicalanaesthesia. Nevertheless, there are potential differences relatedto their activity on the cerebrovascular system. The magnitudeof such difference is not completely known. Methods. In total 40 patients, treated for spinal or maxillo-facialdisorders, were randomly allocated to either i.v. propofol–remifentanilor inhalational sevoflurane anaesthesia. Transcranial Dopplerwas used to assess changes in cerebral blood flow velocity,carbon dioxide reactivity, cerebral autoregulation and the bispectralindex to assess the depth of anaesthesia. Results. Time-averaged mean flow velocity (MFV) was significantlyreduced after induction of anaesthesia in both sevoflurane andpropofol–remifentanil groups (P<0.001). At deeper levelsof anaesthesia, MFV increased in the sevoflurane group, suggestingan uncoupling flow/metabolism, whereas it was further reducedin the propofol–remifentanil group (P<0.001). Indicesof cerebral autoregulation were reduced in patients with high-dosesevoflurane whereas autoregulation was preserved in patientsanaesthetized with propofol–remifentanil (P<0.001).Higher CO₂ concentrations impaired cerebral autoregulation inthe sevoflurane group but not in patients anaesthetized withpropofol–remifentanil. Conclusions. Propofol–remifentanil anaesthesia induceda dose-dependent low-flow state with preserved cerebral autoregulation,whereas sevoflurane at high doses provided a certain degreeof luxury perfusion.     

Multi-level approach to anaesthetic effects produced by sevoflurane or propofol in humans: 1. BIS and blink reflex

Background: The relative roles of forebrain and brainstem in producing adequateanaesthesia are unclear. Methods: We simultaneously analysed the effects of sevoflurane (GroupS; n = 18) or propofol (Group P; n = 29) on the bispectral index(BIS) and the first component of the blink reflex (R1). Thedose of anaesthetic agent was increased until loss of blinkreflex. After discontinuation and reappearance of blink reflexactivity, the amount was increased again. The area under curveR1 (area-R1) of the electromyogram of the orbicularis oculimuscle after electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nervewas measured. Using a sigmoid E_max model and a first-order rateconstant k_e0, we characterized the dose–response relationshipsfor BIS and area-R1. Results: Concentration-dependent depression of BIS and area-R1 was adequatelymodelled. The concentration that causes an effect midway betweenminimum and maximum (EC₅₀) for area-R1 was smaller than EC₅₀for BIS in both groups [0.34 (0.19) vs 1.29 (0.19) vol% and1.78 (0.65) vs 2.69 (0.67) µg ml^–1; mean (SD)].At doses of sevoflurane and propofol with equivalent depressionof BIS, sevoflurane depressed area-R1 more than propofol. Thek_e0 for area-R1 was about half that for BIS in both groups:0.24 (0.19–0.29) vs 0.48 (0.38–0.60) min^–1for Group S; 0.28 (0.23–0.34) vs 0.46 (0.40–0.54)min^–1 for Group P, geometric mean (95% CI). Conclusions: The blink reflex (brainstem function) is more sensitive to sevofluraneor propofol than BIS (forebrain function). Sevoflurane suppressesthe blink reflex more than propofol. Different k_e0s for blinkreflex vs BIS indicate different effect sites.     

Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery

Background. Target-controlled infusions (TCI) are used to simplifyadministration and increase precision of i.v. drugs during generalanaesthesia. However, there is a limited relationship betweenpreset targets and measured concentrations of drugs and betweenmeasured concentrations and measures of brain function, suchas the bispectral index (BIS). Methods. We set out to evaluate the performance of TCI devicesfor propofol (Diprifusor^®) and remifentanil (Remifusor,prototype), during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 21 patients.We also checked if there was any correlation between serum concentrationsof propofol and BIS during individually adjusted anaesthesia. Results. The Diprifusor and Remifusor had a median absoluteperformance error of 60% and 25% respectively. Propofol concentrationswere underpredicted by a median of 60%, and remifentanil concentrationswere slightly overpredicted by a median of 7%. When anaesthesiawas adjusted to keep BIS values between 45 and 60, no correlationexisted between measured concentrations of propofol and thecorresponding BIS values, although both BIS and serum propofolconcentration discriminated well between the awake and asleepstates. Emergence was rapid and uneventful in all patients.Female patients had a more rapid emergence than male patients(6.6 and 11.6 min respectively). Conclusions. TCI devices for remifentanil and propofol resultin large variation in measured serum concentrations. The lackof correlation between BIS and serum concentrations of propofoladds to the debate about whether BIS measures hypnosis as agraded state during surgery. This study confirms that womenwake up faster than men, but provides no explanation for thisrepeatedly shown difference. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 773–80     

Multi-level approach to anaesthetic effects produced by sevoflurane or propofol in humans: 2. BIS and tetanic stimulus-induced withdrawal reflex

Background: General anaesthesia could be assessed at two sites: corticalstructures and the spinal cord. However, the practicalitiesof measurement at these two sites differ substantially. Methods: We simultaneously analysed effects of sevoflurane (Group S;n = 16) or propofol (Group P; n = 17) on bispectral index (BIS)and the tetanic stimulus-induced withdrawal reflex (TIWR). TIWRwas quantified by the area under the curve of the electromyogramof the biceps femoris muscle after electrical stimulation ofthe sural nerve. After loss of consciousness, TIWR was evokedonce per minute. The anaesthetic was increased until TIWR disappeared.After discontinuation of the anaesthetic and reappearance ofTIWR, the amount of anaesthetic was increased again. Using asigmoid E_max model and a first-order rate constant k_e0, we characterizedthe dose–response relationships for BIS and TIWR. Results: Concentration-dependent depression of TIWR was reasonably wellmodelled for sevoflurane, but poorly for propofol. TIWR wascompletely suppressed by sevoflurane, but not propofol. Sevofluranereduced TIWR to 5 mV ms (very weak movement) at 1.68 vol% end-expiredconcentration [ minimum alveolar concentration (MAC value)].The k_e0s for TIWR were smaller than those for BIS: 0.25 (0.16–0.39)vs 0.41 (0.33–0.51) min^–1 for Group S; 0.25 (0.22–0.30)vs 0.34 (0.29–0.40) min^–1 for Group P [geometricmean (95% CI)]. Conclusions: High concentrations of sevoflurane depress TIWR more than propofol.With propofol, we frequently observed a paradoxical behaviourof muscles of the lower leg. TIWR lags behind BIS, indicatingdifferent effect sites for two intended anaesthetic effects:unresponsiveness to noxious stimulation and unconsciousness.     

Cerebral state index: comparison between pairwise registrations from the left and the right sides of the brain

Background. Lateralization of cerebral blood flow and EEG activityis known to vary during cognition, sleep and waking. In spiteof this, electrode placement for the cerebral state index (CSI^TM)monitor is not specified to a particular side of the brain.This study is designed to determine if pairwise registrationsdiffer for CSI measured simultaneously from the left or rightsides of the brain. Methods. In total, 25 ASA I–II patients undergoing electiveday surgery under general anaesthesia were recruited. Pairwiserecordings were made every minute from two CSI^TM monitors (CerebralState Monitor, Danmeter A/S; Odense, Denmark) connected to theleft and the right side of the head. Sedation was graded accordingto the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation rating scaleand correlated with CSI. Results. A large overlap of indices, of similar magnitude, foreach side of the brain was seen between different levels ofsedation. The agreement between pairwise registrations was high,correlation between the 584 CSI pairs of recordings left/rightwas r²=0.92. Conclusions. Despite known lateralization of the EEC, this studyfound a very high correlation in CSI derived simultaneouslyfrom the left and right sides of the brain by two independentmonitors. LMA® is the property of Intavent Ltd.     

Effects of intramuscular administration of lidocaine or bupivacaine on induction and maintenance doses of propofol evaluated by bispectral index

Background. Interest in combining local and general anaesthesiahas lead to studies investigating possible interactions. Ina prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we tested whetherlocal anaesthetics administered i.m. potentiate the hypnoticeffect of propofol. Methods. Sixty patients (three groups, n=20) undergoing lowerabdominal surgery with total i.v. propofol anaesthesia wereinvestigated. Patients in Group B received i.m. bupivacaine(5 mg ml^–1) 1 mg kg^–1, patients in Group Lreceived i.m. lidocaine (100 mg ml^–1) 2 mg kg^–1and patients in Group C received i.m. saline 5 ml beforeoperation. Hypnosis was measured with bispectral index (BIS). Results. The induction (BIS <45), and the maintenance dosesof propofol (BIS between 40 and 50) were significantly lessin Group B and Group L compared with the control group. Inductiondoses were 1.58 (SD 0.39), 1.56 (0.24) and 2.03 (0.33) mg kg^–1respectively; P<0.0001. Maintenance doses were 6.33 (2.06),7.08 (1.23) and 9.95 (2.02) mg kg^–1 respectively in thefirst hour; P<0.0001. Groups B and L were associated withan attenuated haemodynamic response to both induction and intubation. Conclusion. I.M. administered local anaesthetics are associatedwith a decrease in both the induction and maintenance dosesof propofol during total i.v. anaesthesia and a reduction inhaemodynamic responses. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 849–52     

A comparison of bispectral index and entropy monitoring, in patients undergoing embolization of cerebral artery aneurysms after subarachnoid haemorrhage

Background. Processed EEG monitoring of anaesthetic depth couldbe useful in patients receiving general anaesthesia followingsubarachnoid haemorrhage. We conducted an observational studycomparing performance characteristics of bispectral index (BIS)and entropy monitoring systems in these patients. Methods. Thirty-one patients of the World Federation of Neurosurgeonsgrades 1 and 2, undergoing embolization of cerebral artery aneurysmsfollowing acute subarachnoid haemorrhage, were recruited tohave both BIS and entropy monitoring during general anaesthesia.BIS and entropy indices were matched to clinical indicatorsof anaesthetic depth. Anaesthetists were blinded to the anaestheticdepth monitoring indices. Analysis of data from monitoring devicesallowed calculation of prediction probability (P_K) constants,and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to be performed. Results. BIS and entropy [response entropy (RE), state entropy(SE)] performed well in their ability to show concordance withclinically observed anaesthetic depth. P_K values were generallyhigh (BIS 0.966–0.784, RE 0.934–0.663, SE 0.857–0.701)for both forms of monitoring. ROC curve analysis shows a highsensitivity and specificity for all monitoring indices whenused to detect the presence or absence of eyelash reflex. Areaunder curve for BIS, RE and SE to detect the absence or presenceof eyelash reflex was 0.932, 0.888 and 0.887, respectively.RE provides earlier warning of return of eyelash reflex thanBIS. Conclusion. BIS and entropy monitoring perform well in patientswho receive general anaesthesia after good grade subarachnoidhaemorrhage.     

Correlation and agreement between bispectral index and state entropy of the electroencephalogram during propofol anaesthesia

Background. Bispectral index (BIS) and state entropy (SE) monitorhypnosis. We evaluated the correlation and the agreement betweenthose parameters during propofol anaesthesia and laryngoscopywith and without muscle relaxation. Methods. A total of 25 patients were anaesthetized with propofol.At steady state (SS: BIS 40–50), they randomly receivedrocuronium (R) or saline (S); 3 min thereafter, a 20 s laryngoscopywas performed. Correlation (regression analysis) and agreement(Bland–Altman analysis) were evaluated before induction(baseline), at loss of eyelash reflex (LER), at SS and duringthe first 3 min after laryngoscopy (L). Results. The correlation coefficient r (95% CI), the mean difference(MD) (95% CI), and the limits of agreement [lower-upper limitsof 95% CI of MD (SD 1.96)] between BIS and SE were as follows.Overall recordings: 0.87 (0.83 to 0.90), 2.5 (1.2 to 3.0), and[–19.5 to 24.6]; Baseline: 0.45 (0.06 to 0.72), 7.6 (6.0to 9.2), and [–2.7 to 17.9]; LER: 0.74 (0.47 to 0.88),8.3 (3.5 to 13.2), and [–22.6 to 39.3]; SS, all patients:0.41 (0.14 to 0.63), 2.0 (–0.5 to 4.6), and [–19.0to 23.3]; SS, Group S: 0.36 (–0.07 to 0.68), 1.9 (–2.5to 6.3), and [–25.0 to 28.8]; SS, Group R: 0.63 (0.32to 0.82), 0.2 (–2.0 to 2.3), and [–14.0 to 14.4];L, all patients: 0.49 (0.32 to 0.63), 0.7 (–1.6 to 3.0),and [–25.6 to 27.1]; L, Group S: 0.41 (0.13 to 0.63),2.3 (–2.4 to 7.1), and [–36.7 to 41.3]; L, GroupR: 0.72 (0.56 to 0.83), –0.6 (–2.2 to 1.0), and[–14.3 to 13.1]. The correlation was good except for SSin Group S. The MD was significantly different from 0 for overallrecordings, during baseline and LER, but not for the other conditions.The agreement was poor except for baseline, and SS and L inGroup R. Conclusions. BIS and SE are globally well correlated. In contrast,agreement is poor as differences of more than 20 units are frequentlyobserved, except for awake and paralysed patients.     

Predictive performance of 'Servin's formula' during BIS-guided propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion in morbidly obese patients

Background. The aim of this study was to assess the predictiveperformance of ‘Servin's formula’ for bispectralindex (BIS)-guided propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion(TCI) in morbidly obese patients. Methods. Twenty patients (ASA physical status II–III,age 32–64 yr) undergoing bilio-intestinal bypass surgery,were recruited. Anaesthesia was induced by using a TCI of propofolwith an initial target plasma concentration of 6 µg ml^–1,then adapted to maintain stable BIS values ranging between 40and 50. A TCI of remifentanil was added to achieve pain controland haemodynamic stability. For propofol, weight was correctedas suggested by Servin and colleagues. With ideal body weight(IBW) corrected according to formula suggested by Lemmens andcolleagues. For remifentanil, weight was corrected accordingto IBW. Arterial blood samples for the determination of bloodpropofol concentrations were collected at different surgicaltimes. The predictive performance of propofol TCI was evaluatedby examining performance accuracy. Results. Median prediction error and median absolute predictionerror were –32.6% (range –53.4%; –2.5%) and33.1% (10.8%; 53.4%), respectively. Wobble median value was5.9% (2.5%; 25.2%) while divergence median value was –1.5%h^–1 (–7.7; 33.8% h^–1). Conclusion. Significant bias between predicted and measuredplasma propofol concentrations was found while the low wobblevalues suggest that propofol TCI system is able to maintainstable drug concentrations over time. As already suggested before,a computer simulation confirmed that the TCI system performancecould be significantly improved when total body weight is used.     

Remifentanil target-controlled infusion vs propofol target-controlled infusion for conscious sedation for awake fibreoptic intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) is a technique used in patients with difficult airways. This study compares the suitability of remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) to propofol TCI for conscious sedation during AFOI in patients with bona fide difficult airways. METHODS: We recruited 24, ASA I-III patients, who were undergoing sedation for elective AFOI. Patients were randomized to one of the two groups, Group P (n=10) received propofol TCI and Group R (n=14) received remifentanil TCI. Primary outcome measures were conditions achieved at endoscopy, intubation, and post-intubation, which were graded using scoring systems. Other parameters measured were the endoscopy time, intubation time, and number of attempts at intubation. A postoperative interview was conducted to determine recall of events and level of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Endoscopy scores (0-5) and intubation scores (0-5) were significantly different [Group P 3 (1-4) vs Group R 1 (0-3) P<0.0001, Group P 3 (2-4) vs Group R 1 (0-3) P<0.0001, respectively]; with much better conditions in Group R, endoscopy times and intubation times were also significantly different, being shorter in Group R (P<0.007 and P<0.023, respectively). Patient tolerance of the procedure, judged by the discomfort scores (P<0.004) and the post-intubation scores (P<0.08), was significantly better in Group R. The level of recall for events was higher in Group R. However, there were no significant differences in the patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil TCI appears to provide better conditions for AFOI when compared with propofol TCI. The disadvantage of remifentanil in this setting may be a higher incidence of recall.     

Reduction of pain during induction with target-controlled propofol and remifentanil

BACKGROUND: Pain on injection of propofol is unpleasant. We hypothesized that propofol infusion pain might be prevented by infusing remifentanil before starting the propofol infusion in a clinical setting where target-controlled infusions (TCI) of both drugs were used. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to determine the effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil to prevent the pain without producing complications. METHODS: A total of 128 patients undergoing general surgery were randomly allocated to receive normal saline (control) or remifentanil to a target Ce of 2 ng ml(-1) (R2), 4 ng ml(-1) (R4), or 6 ng ml(-1) (R6) administered via TCI. After the target Ce was achieved, the infusion of propofol was started. Remifentanil-related complications were assessed during the remifentanil infusion, and pain caused by propofol was evaluated using a four-point scale during the propofol infusion. RESULTS: The incidence of pain was significantly lower in Groups R4 and R6 than in the control and R2 groups (12/32 and 6/31 vs 26/31 and 25/32, respectively, P<0.001). Pain was less severe in Groups R4 and R6 than in the control and R2 groups (P<0.001). However, both incidence and severity of pain were not different between Groups R4 and R6. No significant complications were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: During induction of anaesthesia with TCI of propofol and remifentanil, a significant reduction in propofol infusion pain was achieved without significant complications by prior administration of remifentanil at a target Ce of 4 ng ml(-1).