Circulating Cytokines and Granulocyte-Derived Enzymes During Complex Heart Surgery: A Clinical Study with Special Reference to Heparin-Coating of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits

Blood contact with artificial surfaces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers a systemic inflammatory response in which complement, granulocytes and cytokines play a major role. Heparin-coated CPB circuits were recently shown to reduce complement and granulocyte activation in such circumstances. The present study comprised 20 complex heart operations, 10 with heparin-coated circuits (group HC) and 10 controls (group C), with evaluation of changes in terminal complement complex, the granulocyte enzymes myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin, and the cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8). Standard heparin dose and uncoated cardiotomy reservoir were used in all cases. In both groups the levels of enzymes and terminal complement complex rose significantly, beginning at conclusion of CPB, above base values, without significant intergroup differences. IL-6 and IL-8 also increased significantly, but tended to be lower in the HC group, starting at CPB end and continuing until 20 hours postoperatively: for IL-6 the difference was significant at CPB end (83 ± 18 vs 197 ± 39 μg/1, p = 0.21). Significantly increased inflammatory response was thus found during complex heart operations even with use of heparin-coated CPB sets. The heparin-coating of circuits seems to diminish cytokine production.     

Biocompatibility of Heparin-Coated Membrane Oxygenator During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract: The biocompatibility of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit, in which an oxygenator is solely heparinized, was assessed by systemic inflammatory reactions as an indicator during CPB. Fourteen patients, 11 males and 3 females, underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 7 patients each. For the heparin–coated oxygenator group (Group H), a heparin–coated membrane oxygenator was used in the CPB circuit, and in the control (Group C) an uncoated membrane oxygenator was employed. Systemic inflammatory reactions, such as platelet activation, prostaglandin production, complement activation, and activated granulocyte released substance, were measured prior to, during, and 6 h after CPB. The number of platelets decreased after protamine administration in both groups (14. 5 ±4. 7 times 10⁴/μl in Group H and 13. 8 ± 8. 7 times 10⁴/μd in Group C) and returned to baseline levels in Group H while it remained decreased in Group C at 6 h after CPB. The platelet factor 4 level was significantly lower in Group H (181 ± 40 ng/ml) than in Group C (297 ±131 ng/ml) after protamine administration. Thromboxane–B₂ (TXB₂) rose during CPB in both groups; however, there were significantly different levels of TXB₂ between the 2 groups at 60 min after CPB (293±258 pg/ml in Group H versus 408 ± 120 pg/ml in Group C) and after protamine administration (259 ± 122 pg/ml in Group H versus 709 ± 418 pg/ml in Group C). Plasma concentrations of granulocyte elastase were significantly lower in Group H at 30, 60 and 90 min, immediately after, and post–CPB than those of Group C. Although the oxygenator was solely heparinized in the CPB circuit, it was sufficiently effective to reduce inflammatory reactions during coronary artery bypass operation, and the heparin–coated surface seems to be more endothelium–like.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce circulating complement factors and interleukin-6 in paediatric heart surgery

Children are sensitive to the inflammatory side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our intention was to investigate if the biocompatibility benefits of heparin-coated CPB circuits apply to children. In 20 operations, 19 children were randomized to heparin-coated (group HC, n = 10) or standard (group C, n = 10) bypass circuits. Plasma levels of acute phase reactants, interleukins, granulocytic proteins and complement factors were measured. All were significantly elevated after CPB. Levels of complement factor C3a (851 (791-959)ng/ml [median with quartiles] in group C, 497 (476-573)ng/ml in group HC, p < 0.001), Terminal Complement Complex (114 (71-130) AU/ml in group C, 35.5 (28.9-51.4) AU/ml in group HC, p < 0.001), and interleukin-6 (570 (203-743) pg/ml in group C, 168 (111-206)pg/ml in group HC, p = 0.005), were significantly reduced in group HC. Heparin-coated CPB circuits improve the biocompatibility of CPB during heart surgery in the paediatric patient population, as reflected by significantly reduced levels of circulating complement factors and interleukin-6.     

Heparin-coated circuits reduce myocardial injury in heart or heart-lung transplantation: a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of heparin-coated (HC) circuits have been primarily investigated in routine cardiac operations with limited duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and ischemia. Their benefits have not been conclusively proven but could be more significant when CPB and ischemic times are longer, such as during heart transplantation (HTx) or heart-lung transplantation (HLTx). METHODS: In a 22-month period, 29 patients undergoing HTx and HLTx were randomly divided into two groups using HC (Duraflo II, n = 14, 10 HTx and 4 HLTx) or uncoated but identical circuits (NHC group, n = 15, 10 HTx and 5 HLTx). All patients received full systemic heparinization (3 mg/kg) during CPB. Plasma endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, and cardiac troponin-I were measured before heparin administration, immediately after aortic cross-clamping, 5, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes, and 12 and 24 hours after aortic declamping. The intensive care unit (ICU) staff and the laboratory technologists were blinded as to the use of HC circuits. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between groups were found with respect to all baseline values, duration of CPB and aortic cross-clamping, graft ischemic time, doses of heparin, postoperative blood loss and transfusion, peak lactate and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme values, duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of ICU stay. One patient in each group died during the hospital stay. Patients in the HC group needed more protamine sulfate after CPB. Although endotoxin levels were similar in the two groups, significantly lower IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 levels were observed 1 hour after aortic declamping in the HC group. The release of cardiac troponin-I was also significantly reduced in the HC group 12 and 24 hours after reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HC circuit limits both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses to CPB. It may also reduce myocardial injury after prolonged duration of CPB and ischemia.     

Effects of Heparin Coating of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits on In Vitro Oxygen Free Radical Production During Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) oxygen free radicals (OFR) are formed, which can mediate reactions damaging tissue components. Blood contact with artificial surfaces during CPB leads to an activation of leukocytes, which are one of the sources of the OFR. Heparin coating of the CPB circuit reduces granulocyte activation. In the present study, the heparin-coated circuits with noncoated cardiotomy reservoirs (Group HC) were compared with noncoated, otherwise similar CPB sets (Group C). In each group, 8 patients were operated on for coronary revascularization. The release of granulocyte granule proteins myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lac-toferrin (LF) was evaluated. Production of OFR in the whole blood and in the granulocyte suspension were measured by chemiluminescence (CL). In both groups the whole blood CL declined during CPB. The whole blood CL induced by serum-opsonized zymosan, when enhanced by luminol, was significantly lower in Group HC at 45 min after CPB start (68 ± 6% of initial values in Group HC vs. 87 ± 6% in Group C, mean ± SEM) and 30 min after protaminization (54 ± 6% of initial values in Group HC vs. 72 ± 6% in Group C, mean ± SEM), and CL was significantly higher in Group HC at CPB end (83 ± 5% of initial values in Group HC vs. 67 ± 5% in Group C, mean ± SEM) when enhanced by lucigenin. CL of isolated granulocytes showed no significant differences between the groups. Release of MPO at CPB end and of LF 45 min after start of CPB and at CPB end were significantly lower in the heparin-coated CPB circuits.     

Heparin-coated versus uncoated extracorporeal circuit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of heparin-coated circuits on bleeding, transfusion, and platelet count in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting with full heparinization. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without previous sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either a heparin-coated or an uncoated extracorporeal circuit for CPB. Heparin, 300 micro/kg, was administered, and supplemental amounts were administered to maintain an activated coagulation time of greater than 480 seconds. Platelet counts were determined during CPB. Mediastinal chest tube drainage was collected in the intensive care unit for 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean platelet counts were similar between the groups during CPB. There was no significant difference in 24-hour mediastinal chest tube drainage (mean +/- standard deviation; median) between the heparin-coated (n = 44, 1096 +/- 401, 1015 mL) and uncoated group (n = 44, 1150 +/- 548, 1040 mL; p = 0.91). The heparin-coated group received less allogeneic packed red blood cells (0.9 +/- 1.6, 0.0 v 1.5 +/- 1.8, 1.0 U; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a heparin-coated or uncoated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and full heparinization marginally reduced only red blood cell transfusion but was not associated with platelet sparing or reduced perioperative bleeding.     

Decreased blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass using heparin-coated circuit and 50% reduction of heparin dose.

In a randomized, double-blind study of patients undergoing elective coronary artery grafting, the effect of heparin-coated circuit combined with 50% reduction of systemic heparin bolus was investigated. Ten patients comprised group HC (heparin-coated) and ten group C (controls). The mean total doses of heparin were 172 IU/kg in group HC and 416 IU/kg in group C and the respective protamine doses were 0.96 and 3.96 mg/kg (both p < 0.001). Activated clotting times during cardiopulmonary bypass were significantly shorter in group HC, and both intra- and postoperative bleeding was significantly less than in group C (7.7 vs. 11.7 ml/kg, p = 0.036, and 6.9 vs. 9.7 ml/kg, p = 0.004). Hemoglobin loss via the drains was 22.5 g in group HC and 43.7 g in group C (p < 0.005). Hemolysis at the end of bypass was significantly greater in group C. Apart from one perioperative myocardial infarction in group HC the postoperative course was uneventful. Use of a heparin-coated circuit is concluded to permit complication-free reduction of heparin and protamine doses and to decrease both intra- and postoperative bleeding, which may favorably influence the outcome of coronary artery grafting.     

A prospective, randomized platelet-function study of heparinized oxygenators and cardiotomy suction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if substitution of a heparin-coated oxygenator and salvaged autologous blood for cardiotomy suction would improve platelet function. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: A large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into 1 of 4 groups in a 2 x 2 factorial design by oxygenator (heparinized v nonheparinized) and blood salvage during CPB (cardiotomy suction v salvaged autologous blood). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome measures were platelet function, glass-bead retention, platelet dense-body adenosine triphosphate secretion, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) aggregometry, Plateletworks platelet-function analyzer (Helena Laboratories Corp, Allen Park, MI), and platelet count. Secondary outcome measures were chest-tube drainage and allogeneic blood transfusion requirements. All platelet-function tests except thrombin-receptor activator peptide-induced PRP aggregometry showed a reduction in platelet function during and immediately after CPB (all p < 0.05). The only statistically significant difference in platelet-function tests between the groups was the glass-bead assay at 5 minutes before discontinuation of CPB (p < 0.05). This difference resolved 10 minutes after protamine administration. There were no differences between the groups in the amount of blood transfused, chest-tube drainage, and routine laboratory test results. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that the effects of these changes to the CPB circuit were small and inconsequential in this cohort of patients.     

Influence of Two Blood Conservation Techniques (Cardiotomy Reservoir Versus Cell-Saver) on Biocompatibility of the Heparin Coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit During Coronary Revascularization Surgery

A bstract Blood conservation during cardiac surgery is critically important because of the inherent risks in homologous blood transfusions. Two techniques for the intraoperative conservation of blood—retransfusion of the red cells using a cell-saver (CS), or retransfusion of the blood using a cardiotomy suction (CTR) system—were compared using biocompatibility markers, granulocyte activation, and production of oxygen-free radicals (OFR). In the CTR group, heparin coated circuits with an uncoated cardiotomy reservoir were used. For the CS group, identical heparin coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) sets, without a cardiotomy reservoir but with a CS, were used. In each group, eight patients had coronary artery bypass grafting performed. The capacity of the whole blood and the granulocytes to produce OFR was estimated by a chemiluminescence, and granulocyte activation was measured as release of the granulocyte granule proteins myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lactoferrin. A significantly reduced capacity to produce OFR by the whole blood was noted at 45 minutes of CPB in the CTR group (68%± 17% vs 94%± 16% in the CS group). MPO release was higher after 3 hours (p = 0.05) and 20 hours (p < 0.05), postoperatively, in the CTR group (417 ± 77 μg/L and 257 ± 31 μg/L vs 246 ± 25 μg/L and 164 ± 12 ng/L, respectively, in the CS group). We conclude that the heparin coated CPB circuit with the uncoated cardiotomy reservoir may be less biocompatible than the identical CPB set used together with the CS.     

Heparin-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits Reduce Circulating Complement Factors and Interleukin-6 in Paediatric Heart Surgery

Children are sensitive to the inflammatory side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our intention was to investigate if the biocompatibility benefits of heparin-coated CPB circuits apply to children. In 20 operations, 19 children were randomized to heparin-coated (group HC, n = 10) or standard (group C, n = 10) bypass circuits. Plasma levels of acute phase reactants, interleukins, granulocytic proteins and complement factors were measured. All were significantly elevated after CPB. Levels of complement factor C3a (851 (791-959) ng/ml [median with quartiles] in group C, 497 (476-573) ng/ml in group HC, p &lt; 0.001), Terminal Complement Complex (114 (71-130) AU/ml in group C, 35.5 (28.9-51.4) AU/ml in group HC, p &lt; 0.001), and interleukin-6 (570 (203-743) pg/ml in group C, 168 (111-206) pg/ml in group HC, p = 0.005), were significantly reduced in group HC. Heparin-coated CPB circuits improve the biocompatibility of CPB during heart surgery in the paediatric patient population, as reflected by significantly reduced levels of circulating complement factors and interleukin-6.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce blood cell trauma. Experiments in the pig

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding remain important problems in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared heparin-coated with non-coated circuits in the pig. Twenty animals were perfused for 2 h at normothermia using membrane oxygenators (Bentley Bos 50). Two groups were studied. In the non-coated group (NC, n = 11) the CPB circuits used were without a heparin coating. This group had systemic heparinization of 400 IU/kg to maintain an ACT (activated clotting time) of over 400 s during CPB. In the coated group (C, n = 9), all surfaces exposed to blood in the CPB circuits were heparin-coated. This group had the heparin dose reduced to 25% (100 IU/kg) without further administration regardless of ACT. During CPB, group C displayed shorter ACT (per definition), higher platelet count, platelet adhesion and lower fibrinolysis and haemolysis (P less than 0.05) as compared to group NC. No thromboembolic events were detected during CPB. Three animals in group NC and 4 animals in group C were weaned from CPB and protaminized. Four hours postoperatively, the leucocyte consumption was two-fold greater and blood loss about four-fold greater in group NC as compared with group C (P less than 0.05). Perfusion with heparin-coated surfaces reduces blood cell trauma. The decreased postoperative blood loss observed in group C is probably explained by the reduced dosages of heparin and protamine.     

Protamine reduces whole blood platelet aggregation after cardiopulmonary bypass

Objectives: Platelet dysfunction is an important cause of postoperative bleeding after cardiac surgery. Protamine is routinely used for reversal of heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP), but may affect platelet aggregation. We assessed changes in platelet function in relation to protamine administration. Design: Platelet aggregation was analyzed by impedance aggregometry before and after protamine administration in 25 adult cardiac surgery patients. Aggregation was also studied after in vitro addition of heparin and protamine. The activators adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TRAP), arachidonic acid (AA) and collagen (COL) were used.

Results: Platelet aggregation was reduced by approximately 50% after in vivo protamine administration; ADP 640?±?230 (AU*min, mean?±?SD) to 250?±?160, TRAP 939?±?293 to 472?±?260, AA 307?±?238 to 159?±?143 and COL 1022?±?350 to 506?±?238 (all p?<?0.001). Aggregation was also reduced after in vitro addition of protamine alone with activators ADP from 518?±?173 to 384?±?157 AU*min p?<?0.001, and AA 449?±?311 to 340?±?285 (p?<?0.01) and protamine combined with heparin (1:1 ratio) with activators ADP to 349?±?160 and AA to 308?±?260 (both p?<?0.001); and COL from 586?±?180 to 455?±?172 (p?<?0.05). Conclusions: Protamine given after CPB markedly reduces platelet aggregation. Protamine added in vitro also reduces platelet aggregation, by itself or in combination with heparin.     

Reducing hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a combined approach

Interventions such as heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and reduced shed blood reinfusion have shown mixed results when applied individually for limiting hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared coagulation and fibrinolytic activation during conventional CPB (control) (CTRL) using noncoated circuits, no antifibrinolytics, and open cardiotomy with a combined strategy (HAC) that used heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and closed cardiotomy. Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for primary coronary bypass grafting surgery from 9 CTRL patients and 10 HAC patients. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A levels (markers of thrombin and fibrin generation) were reduced in the HAC versus CTRL group after 30 min of CPB (P < 0.05). Average tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) levels were significantly lower in the HAC group by 30 min on CPB (P < 0.05), resulting in preservation of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 during CPB (P < 0.05). D-Dimer, a measure of intravascular fibrin formation and removal, was reduced in the HAC group during and after CPB (P < 0.005). Overall, the combined strategy was associated with a reduction in CPB-induced increases in markers of thrombin generation, fibrin formation, tPA release, and fibrin degradation and better preservation of PAI-1. IMPLICATIONS: A combined approach during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) that uses heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and limited reinfusion of shed pericardial blood is associated with reduced activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems that typically occurs during conventional CPB.     

Disadvantages of prostacyclin infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: a double-blind study of 50 patients having coronary revascularization

Prostacyclin (PGI2) has been suggested for use in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) because of its positive effects on platelet number and function. Fifty patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using a bubble oxygenator received heparin, 3 mg per kilogram of body weight, and then were randomly assigned to receive PGI2, 25 ng/kg/min, beginning 5 minutes before and until the end of CPB (26 patients) or a placebo (24 patients). Both groups were similar in sex, age, heparin dose, protamine dose, and CPB time. During CPB, mean arterial pressure fell significantly with PGI2 (76 +/- 2 mm Hg to 53 +/- 2 mm Hg; p less than 0.05) and necessitated pressor substances. Platelet counts fell significantly in both groups with the start of CPB, but after 60 minutes were similar in both groups (118 +/- 9 X 10(3) versus 130 +/- 8 X 10(3); not significant [NS]) and were unchanged 3 hours after CPB. Total chest tube output was 647 +/- 51 ml (placebo group) versus 576 +/- 34 ml (PGI2 group) (NS); 18 of the patients given PGI2 required 26 transfusions compared with 16 transfusions in 8 of the patients given a placebo (p less than 0.05). In PGI2 patients, arterial oxygen tension on 100% oxygen fell from 281 +/- 18 mm Hg before CPB to 223 +/- 17 mm Hg immediately after CPB (p less than 0.05). The placebo patients did not show a change in this variable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Platelet Function During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Multiple Electrode Aggregometry: Comparison of Centrifugal and Roller Pumps

Blood trauma may be lower with centrifugal pumps (CPs) than with roller pumps (RPs) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), because, unlike RPs, CPs do not compress the tubing, and shear stress is considered lower in CPs than in RPs. However, relative platelet function remains unclear. Using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), we compared platelet function with CP and RP. Ten swine underwent CPB for 3 h, with five weaned off using CP and five using RP. Platelet function was measured using MEA, as were hemoglobin concentration and platelet count, before sternotomy, after heparin infusion, 30 min and 3 h after starting CPB, after protamine infusion, and 60 min after stopping CPB. Platelet activation was initiated with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), and thrombin receptor‐activating protein 6 (TRAP). Fibrinogen, platelet factor 4 (PF4), and β‐thromboglobin (β‐TG) concentrations were measured before sternotomy and 60 min after stopping CPB. In the CP group and using ADP, aggregation was significantly reduced 30 min (P = 0.019) and 3 h (P = 0.027) after starting CPB, recovering to baseline 60 min after CPB was stopped. In the RP group, aggregation was significantly decreased 30 min (P = 0.007) and 3 h (P = 0.003) after starting CPB and after protamine administration (P = 0.028). With AA, aggregation significantly decreased 30 min after starting CPB in both the CP (P = 0.012) and RP (P = 0.016) groups, slightly increasing 3 h after starting CPB and after protamine infusion, and recovering to baseline 60 min after CPB cessation. With TRAP, aggregation in the CP and RP groups decreased 30 min after starting the pump, although changes were not significant; aggregation gradually recovered after 3 h and returned to baseline 60 min after the pumps were stopped. There were no significant differences at all sampling points of MEA. In both groups, fibrinogen, PF4, and β‐TG concentrations were similar 60 min after pump cessation and before sternotomy. Platelet function, evaluated with MEA, was lowest 30 min after CPB was started but did not decrease over time in either group. As assessed by MEA, platelet function using CP and RP did not differ significantly. Platelet dysfunction was caused mainly by initial contact with foreign materials and may not be dependent on type of pump.     

Biocompatibility of Heparin-Coated Circuits in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract: In this study, we evaluated the biocompatibility of heparin-coated circuits in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Eight patients were divided into 2 groups: the control group (Group C) and heparin-coated group (Group H). In Group H, CPB circuits, including the arterial pump, oxygenator, and cannulas were heparin-coated. Before, during, and after CPB, blood samples were obtained to assess the platelet counts (Plat), α2-plasmin plas-minogen inhibitor complex (PIC), thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), C3 activation products (C3a), inter-leukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocyte (PMN) elastase. There was no significant difference in Plat, PIC, or TAT between groups. Group H showed significantly low levels of C3a (during and after CPB), PMN elastase (during CPB), and IL-6 (after CPB). These data demonstrated that in pediatric CPB, heparin-coated CPB circuits reduced the activation of complements and the production of PMN elastase and IL-6, suggesting the superior biocompatibility of the heparin-coated circuits.     

Reduced Granulocyte Activation with a Heparin–Coated Device in an In Vitro Model of Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Granulocyte activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), resulting in degranulation, may have adverse effects. Fresh whole human blood and priming solution was circulated through oxygenator/tubing sets coated with functional heparin (n = 7) and through uncoated sets (n = 7) in model CPB. Plasma concentrations of the primary granule protein myeloperoxidase (MPO) and the secondary granule protein lactoferrin (LF) were measured in radioimmunoassays, and the neutrophils were counted. After 120 min, seven to nine times baseline concentrations of LF (p less than 0.0001) were observed with both devices. Increases of MPO were also significant, but significantly larger (p less than 0.01) with the uncoated devices. There was an equivalent reduction in neutrophil numbers in both groups. MPO did not bind to heparin-coated Sephadex particles in gel chromatography. Thus, the heparin coating most likely prevented the release of potentially harmful primary granule proteins, indicating improved biocompatibility. Adhesion of neutrophils and exocytosis of LF, which may be involved in adhesion, were unaffected.     

The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators

Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells. IMPLICATIONS: Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.     

Heparin-coated circuits reduce the formation of TNFα during cardiopulmonary bypass

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes a systemic intlammatory response. TNFα, which is a major inflammatory mediator, has been found in the circulation during and after CPB. Although previous studies have shown that heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuits reduces complement and granulocyte activation, and the inflammatory response, the possible effect of heparin coating on TNFα formation and the inflammatory response has not been fully investigated.
Methods: Eighteen patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were divided randomly into two groups. One group of patients had extracorporeal perfusion using heparin coated circuits (HC group, n = 9). The other group had extra-corporeal perfusion using an identical circuit that was not coated (UC group, n = 9). Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for measurement of plasma TNFα, plasma IL-8, neutrophil count, and neutrophil elastase.
Results: Plasma levels of TNFα increased during CPB in the UC group but not in the HC group. Plasma concentrations of IL-8 increased similarly during and after CPB in both groups. Coating the circuits with heparin did not affect the levels of IL-8. In both groups, the neutrophil count increased after the release of the aortic cross clamp and remained elevated for three days. In the HC group, however, the increase of neutrophil count was significantly lower compared with the UC group. Plasma concentrations of neutrophil elastase were significantly increased during and after CPB in both groups. However, the levels of elastase were significantly lower at certain time points in the HC group.
Conclusion: From these observations, we conclude that heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuits reduces the TNFα formation during CPB, which may reduce neutrophil activation.     

Hemostatic Activation and Inflammatory Response during Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Impact of Heparin Management

Background: Cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to fulminant activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system. The authors hypothesized that heparin concentration-based anticoagulation management compared with activated clotting time-based heparin management during CPB leads to more effective attenuation of hemostatic activation and inflammatory response. In a randomized prospective study, the authors compared the influence of anticoagulation with a heparin concentration-based system (Hepcon HMS; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) to that of activated clotting time-based management on the activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system during CPB.

Methods: Two hundred elective patients (100 in each group) undergoing standard cardiac surgery in normothermia were enrolled. No antifibrinolytic agents or aprotinin and no heparin-coated CPB systems were used. Samples were collected after administration of the heparin bolus before initiation of CPB and after conclusion of CPB before protamine infusion.

Results: There were no differences in the pre-CPB values between both groups. After CPB there were significantly higher concentrations (P < 0.05) for heparin and a significant reduction in thrombin generation (25.2 +/- 21.0 SD vs. 34.6 +/- 25.1), d-dimers (1.94 +/- 1.74 SD vs. 2.58 +/- 2.1 SD), and neutrophil elastase (715.5 +/- 412 SD vs. 856.8 +/- 428 SD), and a trend toward lower [beta]-thromboglobulin, C5b-9, and soluble P-selectin in the Hepcon HMS group. There were no differences in the post-CPB values for platelet count, adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation, antithrombin III, soluble fibrin, Factor XIIa, or postoperative blood loss.