Gastrointestinal transit after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or ileostomy

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis increases the frequency of stooling, perhaps due in part to the loss of an ileocecal or colonic braking effect on gastrointestinal transit. To assess whether colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or with ileostomy accelerates gastrointestinal transit, we studied 16 IPAA patients (mean +/- SEM stool frequency, 8 +/- 1 stools/day), 5 patients after colectomy and Brooke ileostomy, and 8 healthy, unoperated controls (1 +/- 1 stools/day). Gastric emptying of liquids and small bowel transit of chyme were measured concurrently with a dual isotope technique. Gastric emptying was similar among all groups. In contrast, postprandial small bowel transit of the head of a duodenal marker was slowed, not accelerated, in IPAA patients (178 +/- 26 min) compared to Brooke subjects (80 +/- 32 min, P less than 0.05) and controls (75 +/- 15 min, P less than 0.01). Maximal filling of both the ileal pouch (341 +/- 19 min) and the ileostomy bag (348 +/- 12 min) occurred later than filling of the colon in controls (243 +/- 32 min, P less than 0.01). Overall stool frequency did not correlate with small bowel transit in the ileoanal patients, but the two ileoanal subjects with greatest stool frequency (11 and 18 stools/day) had the earliest arrival of marker at the pouch. In conclusion, removal of the colon markedly slowed small bowel transit in most patients, although it did not alter gastric emptying of liquids. Creation of an ileal pouch and ileoanal anastomosis further slowed transit of the head of the meal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis.

We examined the physiology of continence in 12 patients at least four months after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. The mean fecal output (+/-SEM) was 598 +/- 60 gm, passed as 12 +/- 4 movements/24 hr, of which 4 +/- 1 were passed at night. The patients were generally continent during the day and could distinguish gas from stool, but 11 of 12 leaked stools at night. Anal sphincter resting pressures (71 +/- 8 cm H2O) and squeeze pressures (171 +/- 15 cm H2O) of patients were similar to those of ten healthy controls (P greater than 0.05), although the rectal inhibitory reflex was absent in the patients. After operation, the distal bowel had a pressure-volume curve of greater slope (0.15 +/- 0.05 ml/cm H2O) than it had in controls (0.07 +/- 0.01 ml/cm H2O, P less than 0.05) and a lesser maximum capacity (patients, 248 +/- 31 ml; controls, 406 +/- 26 ml; P less than 0.05). The greater the capacity of the neorectum, the fewer was the number of bowel movements/day (r = 0.91, P less than 0.001). We concluded that the operation preserved the anal sphincter, although it decreased the capacity and compliance of the distal bowel and impaired continence.     

Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Bowel function varies markedly among patients with colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Little is known of the mechanisms controlling fecal continence and frequency of defecation after operation. The aim of this study was to determine which features of the anal sphincter and neorectum accounted for the variation in clinical outcome. Twenty patients were studied 4 to 35 months after operation and compared to 12 healthy volunteers. Despite several patients exhibiting impaired fecal continence, anal sphincteric length and pressures and ileal pouch capacity and distensibility were similar in patients and controls. Patients with poor results, however, had rapid filling of their ileal pouch, which resulted in early onset of high amplitude propulsive pressure waves in the pouch. As these waves became more frequent, defecation resulted. Patients with poor results also were not able to empty adequately their pouch. The poorer the completeness of evacuation, the more frequent the defecation (r = 0.62, p less than 0.01). The authors conclude that rapid pouch filling and impaired pouch evacuation can lead to increased stool frequency in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.     

Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The aim of our study was to determine whether ileal pouch motility and evacuability and the 24 hour fecal output influence stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In 23 patients, at a mean of 24 months postoperatively (range 22 to 26 months), ileal pouch motility was measured using an intraluminal bag and pressure-sensitive catheters. The pattern and efficiency of ileal pouch emptying was determined scintigraphically. A 24 hour stool collection was made and the stool output and stool frequency recorded. The volume of ileal pouch distention at which large amplitude propulsive waves appeared (the threshold volume) correlated closely with stool frequency. The larger the threshold volume, the fewer the stools per 24 hours (correlation coefficient -0.70; p less than 0.01). Also, the greater the 24 hour stool output, the greater the stool frequency (correlation coefficient 0.79, p less than 0.001). In contrast, the efficiency of ileal pouch evacuation was less strongly related to stool frequency (correlation coefficient -0.41, p = 0.05). We conclude that ileal pouch motility and stool output are major determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Inefficient pouch emptying is less commonly associated with frequent bowel movements.     

Anoneorectal evaluation after colectomy and endorectal ileoanal anastomosis in children and young adults

Recent improvements in the technique of colectomy, rectal mucosectomy, and endorectal ileoanal anastomosis allow a satisfactory result in most patients. However, the clinical outcome is not entirely satisfactory in about 5% to 10% of patients because of excessive stool frequency or episodic fecal incontinence or both. We evaluated anoneorectal function postoperatively to help explain the mechanisms of the difficulties. Six patients with imperfect functional results (group 1) and 6 with good functional results (group 2) after ileoanal anastomosis and closure of the loop ileostomy were compared with 12 healthy volunteers who had not had operation, through a series of tests designed to evaluate anal sphincter and neorectal function. All patients were instructed in balloon dilation of the neorectum to develop a reservoir while awaiting closure of the ileostomy. Anal sphincter manometric measurements of resting and squeeze pressures were obtained with a 4-channel probe attached to a noncompliant pneumohydraulic perfusion system. Incremental inflation of an intraluminal bag while pressures were simultaneously recorded allowed determinations of neorectal capacity and distensibility. The efficiency of neorectal evacuation was assessed by instilling a labeled synthetic viscous load into the distal bowel. Patients in group 1 had lower resting anal pressures (P less than 0.05), lower squeeze pressures (P less than 0.05), smaller neorectal capacities (P = 0.13), and less neorectal distensibility (P = 0.27) than patients in group 2. Furthermore, the values for patients in group 2 closely approximated those found in healthy volunteers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Preservation of continence after ileoanal anastomosis by the coordination of ileal pouch and anal canal motor activity.

Nocturnal incontinence may occur after ileoanal anastomosis and may be related to loss of an effective anal canal pressure barrier during sleep; how pressure and contractions in the proximal bowel influence this barrier is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between anal canal pressure and contractions and contractile activity of the pouch in continent subjects after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and of the rectum in normal controls. A fully ambulatory system for 24-hour pressure recording was used. A flexible transducer catheter was introduced endoscopically so that sensors were at 2, 3, 8, 12, 16, and 24 cm from the anal orifice in 12 healthy controls (7 men, 5 women, mean age: 35 years) and 7 fully continent IPAA patients (4 men, 3 women, mean age: 34 years) more than 12 months postoperatively. Twenty-four hour spontaneous motor activity was stored in a 2.5 megabyte (MB) digital portable recorder. Mean anal canal pressure was calculated, and rectal motor complexes and ileal pouch large pressure waves were characterized. During sleep, resting anal canal pressures were similar in the two groups (72 +/- 12 mm Hg in controls versus 66 +/- 9 mm Hg in IPAA patients [mean +/- standard deviation (SD)], p = NS), but anal canal pressure showed cyclic relaxations (periodicity: 95 +/- 11 min in controls, 54 +/- 18 min in IPAA patients, p less than 0.05), during which the mean pressure trough was 15 +/- 4 mm Hg in controls and 14 +/- 5 mm Hg in IPAA patients (p = NS). In the control patients, during sleep, a mean of six rectal motor complexes were identified (range: 3 to 9). In patients with IPAA, during sleep, a mean of eight large pressure waves per hour were identified (range: 2 to 20). Importantly, in both controls and patients, rectal motor complexes or large pressure waves were always accompanied by rapid return of anal canal pressure from trough to basal values and increased contractile activity. We concluded that, in healthy patients and in continent patients after IPAA, motor activity of the rectum and of the ileal pouch was associated with changes in pressure and contractile activity of the anal canal so that rectal- and neorectal-anal canal pressure gradient, and, in turn, fecal continence were preserved.     

Proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch anastomosis without conservation of a rectal muscular cuff

The technique of proctocolectomy and formation of an ileal reservoir with ileoanal anastomosis is well described. It is believed that the conservation of a rectal muscular cuff is necessary for continence but no data are available to support this contention. The aims of this study were to describe the clinical and physiological aspects of continence after proctocolectomy and ileal J pouch anastomosis without conservation of a rectal muscular cuff. Eighteen consecutive patients (mean age 37.3 years, 16 ulcerative colitis, two familial polyposis) who underwent proctocolectomy and ileoanal anastomosis on the dentate line were studied 6 months after closure of the loop ileostomy. The 18 patients and eight controls underwent: (a) anal manometry; (b) determination of maximum tolerable volume (MTV); (c) liquid continence test (infusion of NaCl at 60 ml/min for 25 min) with simultaneous measurement of ileal reservoir pressure. The volume evacuated during 5 min after the continence test was also measured. The frequency of bowel actions was (mean +/- s.e.m.) 5.3 +/- 0.4 per 24 h (nocturnal 1.14 +/- 0.26). Seventeen of 18 patients (94 per cent) had normal continence and defaecation; one patient was incontinent. A decrease in resting anal canal pressure (102.5 +/- 4 versus 47.5 +/- 6 cmH2O) was observed after ileoanal anastomosis. A rectoanal inhibitory reflex was elicited in one of the 18 patients (6 per cent). Patients were able to retain 1023 +/- 68 ml saline during the liquid continence test. The percentage evacuation of the ileal reservoir was 61 +/- 4.5 per cent. Correlations were found (P = 0.05) between daily stool frequency and the volume of saline retained during the liquid continence test. It is concluded that conservation of a rectal muscular cuff is not necessary for the achievement of good clinical results.     

The physiologic effects of ileal reservoirs and efferent conduits complementing ileoanal anastomosis: an experimental study in dogs

S-shaped ileal reservoirs (SSRs) and double-barreled ileal reservoirs (DBRs) of equal size were placed 6 or 2 cm from the anus and evaluated over 1 year for their ability to improve the functional incontinence noted after an ileoanal anastomosis (IAA). Compared to straight IAA, both reservoirs prolonged intestinal transit (235 minutes versus 135 minutes, P less than 0.001) and alleviated frequency without causing nutritional abnormalities. The capacity of the reservoirs was greater than that of a comparable length of distal ileum in dogs (n = 6) with straight IAA (304 +/- 16 ml versus 102 +/- 2 ml, P less than 0.001). The SSRs (n = 9), in contrast to the DBRs (n = 10), developed excessive volume capacity (360 +/- 30 ml versus 254 +/- 104 ml, P less than 0.01) and obstructive complications. Reservoirs with 6 cm efferent conduits (n = 13), in contrast to those with a 2 cm efferent conduit (n = 6), underwent marked dilatation (334 +/- 24 ml versus 238 +/- 13 ml, P less than 0.005). Electromyography and manometry revealed the DBRs to be more contractile than the SSRs but less than ileum proximal to the anus in dogs with a straight IAA. Ileal reservoirs improve results after IAA. Reservoirs should be complaint and yet contractile (e.g., DBR) so as to discourage excessive dilatation, which is the harbinger of obstruction. Ileal conduits facilitate reservoir placement, but if longer than 2 cm they excessively impeded reservoir emptying, predisposing to excessive reservoir dilatation and obstruction. A DBR with a 2 cm efferent conduit results in continence without obstructive problems.     

Scintigraphic assessment of the anorectal angle in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

To determine whether the anorectal angle was preserved after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, a simple, safe, low-radiation, real-time method of imaging the anorectum was developed. A cylindrical balloon was placed in the neorectum and anal canal and filled with a solution of 99mTc in water. A gamma camera then imaged the angulation of the balloon while the subject was at rest, during sphincteric squeeze, and during a Valsalva maneuver. Thirteen healthy volunteers and six patients were studied after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. An angle was identified in all controls and patients. In the lateral decubitus position at rest, the mean anorectal angle in controls (102 +/- 18 degrees; SD) and anopouch angle in patients (108 +/- 19 degrees) were similar (p = 0.3). Sitting straightened the angle in both groups (p less than 0.03), whereas sphincteric squeeze and a Valsalva maneuver sharpened the angle in both the sitting and standing positions (p less than 0.03). In the lateral decubitus position, however, the pouch group was less able to sharpen the angle than were the controls (p = 0.04). In controls, the anorectal junction descended during sitting and elevated during squeeze (p less than 0.03), but this did not occur in the pouch group. In conclusion, maneuvers favoring or stressing continence (squeeze, Valsalva) sharpened the anorectal angle and elevated the pelvic floor, whereas a maneuver favoring defecation (sitting) straightened the angle and caused the pelvic floor to descend. After ileal-anal anastomosis, the angle and its movements (except those while lying) were similar to controls. Elevation of the pelvic floor during squeeze, however, was decreased, indicating a decreased mobility of the pelvic floor after operation.     

Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis

ILEAL POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice in mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Because the disease is cured by surgical resection, functional results, pouch survival prognosis, and disease or dysplasia control are the major determinants of success. There is controversy as to whether the IPAA should be handsewn with mucosectomy or stapled, preserving the mucosa of the anal transitional zone. Crohn's disease is a contraindication for IPAA, but long-term outcome after IPAA is similar to that for MUC in patients with indeterminate colitis who do not develop Crohn's disease. As development of dysplasia and cancer in the ileal pouch have been reported, a standardized surveillance program is mandatory in cases of MUC, FAP, and chronic pouchitis. COLONIC POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Construction of a colonic pouch is a widely accepted technique to improve functional outcome after low or intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Several randomized studies comparing colo-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPA) with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) have found the pouch functionally superior. Most controlled studies cover only 1-year follow-up, but randomized studies with 2-year follow-up show similar functional results of CPA and CAA. Evacuation difficulty as initially observed was related to pouch size, and the results with smaller pouches (5-6 cm) are more favorable, showing adequate reservoir function without compromising neorectal evacuation. The transverse coloplasty pouch may offer several advantages to J-pouch reconstruction. Current series question whether the neorectal reservoir is the physiological key of the pouch, but rather the decreased motility. The major advantage reported with colonic pouch reconstruction is the lower incidence of anastomotic complications.     

Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently an alternative to proctocolectomy and ileostomy for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis. Some studies have suggested significant anal sphincter damage after mucosal proctectomy. Our aim was to assess prospectively late sphincter function after IPAA. In 250 patients, anorectal pressures were assessed with a pneumohydraulic perfused catheter manometry system. Each patient underwent colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, ileoanal anastomosis of a 15 cm ileal J-pouch, and loop ileostomy. Eight weeks after IPAA, anal manometry was repeated, and the ileostomy was closed. Manometry was repeated at yearly intervals. A decline in resting tone of the anal sphincter occurred early after IPAA with a gradual recovery toward control. External sphincter squeeze after pressures were not affected by IPAA and steadily increased to 8 years after operation. During this time, a progressive increase in J-pouch capacity was noted, and 24-hour stool frequency declined from 7.9 +/- 0.3 stools to 6.5 +/- 0.3 stools (p less than 0.05). We conclude that mucosal proctectomy results in internal anal sphincter trauma but is associated with long-term sphincter recovery, coupled with a significant improvement in external sphincter capacity, ileal pouch volume, and stool frequency.     

Endoscopy-assisted transanal division of an apical pouch bridge after restorative proctocolectomy with a J-shaped ileal pouch

Restorative proctocolectomy and J-shaped ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have been performed as a standard operation for ulcerative colitis. However, functional problems are sometimes troublesome in the postoperative period. The J pouch was constructed from 2 ileal limbs using the gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler. A residual mucosal bridge remained because the stapler had a safety margin at the top of the cartridge. Apical pouch bridge is a residual septum above the ileoanal anastomosis. There are several reports of so-called apical pouch bridge syndrome due to outlet obstruction of the J-shaped ileal pouch by an apical bridge. Division of this septum can resolve the outlet obstruction. We describe a successful endoscopic procedure for division of an apical pouch bridge. An Endo-GIA stapler was introduced into the ileal pouch alongside the endoscope, and division of the apical bridge required a few firings of the Endo-GIA stapler under transanal endoscopic guidance. The symptoms related to the apical pouch bridge were resolved completely without creation of an ileostomy.     

Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.

Between March 1989 and August 1990, we performed 21 stapled J pouch ileonal procedures (20 ulcerative colitis [UC], 1 familial polyposis [FP]) without an ileostomy in 19, of whom 13 were taking prednisone and eight underwent semi-emergent surgery for uncontrollable bleeding. During the same time, an additional four patients required a standard ileonal procedure. The results of anal manometry and clinical function were compared to 25 patients who had previously undergone mucosal stripping and a sutured J pouch ileoanal anastomoses with a temporary diverting ileostomy between October 1982 and August 1990. During this same time period, an additional 19 patients underwent an anti-peristaltic reversed J pouch and 18 an S pouch, for a total of 83 ileoanal procedures. The reversed J pouch had a lower stool frequency than a standard J pouch but had an unacceptable incidence of complications and problems with pouch emptying. The S pouch had a stool frequency similar to the standard J pouch but provided greater length in patients with a short mesentery. Stapled J pouch ileoanal patients had a better (p less than 0.02) maximum and sphincter resting pressure (46 +/- 11 versus 34 +/- 12 mmHg), fewer (p less than 0.05) night-time accidents (22% versus 68%), daytime (17% versus 55%) or night-time (28 versus 61%) spotting, or use of a protective pad at night (11% versus 42%) than nonstapled J pouch ileoanal patients. Stool frequency was similar in the two groups. All but one UC patient had residual disease at the anastomosis. Anal mucosa between the dentate line and stapled anastomosis was 1.8 +/- 1.3 cm (range, 0 to 3.5 cm). Complications in the nonstapled J pouch group included 4 pouches excised (2 for complications, 2 for excessive stool frequency), 1 pelvic abscess, 2 stenosis requiring dilation under anesthesia, 1 enterocutaneous fistula after ileostomy closure, 1 ileostomy site hernia, and 2 small bowel obstructions. Of the 65 patients who underwent ileostomy closure in the entire series, 8 (12%) developed a complication requiring surgical intervention. Complications in the stapled group included 1 anastomotic leak, 1 pouch leak, and 1 pelvic abscess. Patients were managed successfully with drainage (all 3) and diverting ileostomy (1). One patient developed stenosis requiring dilation under anesthesia. The stapled J pouch ileoanal anastomosis is a simpler, safer procedure with less tension than a standard handsewn J pouch but leaves a very small cuff of residual disease. It provides significantly better stool control and may obviate the need for an ileostomy with its complications.     

New Predictor for the Defecatory Function after Sphincter-Preserving Operation: Lumen Score

Few studies on sphincter-preserving surgery have analyzed the colon used for the anastomotic segment. We evaluated the usefulness of measuring the square of the diameter of the sigmoid colon (cm(2)) (lumen score, LS) as a predictor of defecatory function after very low anterior resection (VLAR) for rectal cancer. Measurements were done by radiography with semiliquid barium, and the LS was calculated. A total of 24 patients [straight coloanal reconstruction (VLAR-S), n = 17; colonic J pouch reconstruction (LVAR-J), n = 7] were studied more than 6 months after the operation. VLAR-S was divided by the LS results: the high-LS group had an LS of 12 or more (n = 5), and the low-LS group had an LS of less than 12 (n = 12). The neorectal capacity, anal manometry, and defecatory function were studied. In the VLAR-S group, LS had a significant positive correlation with neorectal capacity (gamma = 0.81, p <0.01) and a negative correlation with bowel frequency (gamma = -0.67, p <0.05). Regarding neorectal capacity, the high-LS group had a significantly larger capacity than the low-LS group (118.0 vs. 88.3 ml; p <0.05). The low-LS group had unfavorable defecatory function compared with that of the high-LS group, which was equal to that of the VLAR-J group. We concluded that the LS is a useful predictor of successful colonic J pouch reconstruction.     

Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Comparison of performance status.

Although the clinical results of Brooke ileostomy are good, patients are permanently incontinent of stool and gas. Alternative operations designed to restore enteric continence, such as ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, must not only be as safe and effective as Brooke ileostomy, but should provide an improved quality of life in order to establish long-term acceptability. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has been performed safely and good functional results have been reported. The quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, however, has not been documented. Two hundred ninety-eight ileal pouch patients and 406 Brooke ileostomy patients who had the operations performed for chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis formed the basis of the study. After adjusting for age, diagnosis, and reoperation rate, logistic regression analysis of performance scores in seven different categories was used to discriminate between operations. Median follow-up was longer in Brooke ileostomy patients than in ileal pouch patients (104 months vs. 47 months, respectively), and Brooke ileostomy patients were slightly older (38 years vs. 32 years). A great majority of patients in each group were satisfied (93% Brooke ileostomy; 95% ileal pouch-anal anastomosis). Thirty-nine per cent of Brooke ileostomy patients, however, desired a change in the type of ileostomy they had. At 47 months, ileal pouch patients had a median of 5 stools per day and 1 at night, 77% did not experience any daytime incontinence, while 22% reported occasional spotting. In each performance category, the performance score discriminated between operations, with the probability of having had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis operation increasing with improvement in performance scores (p less than 0.05). We concluded that after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, patients experienced significant advantages in performing daily activities compared to patients with Brooke ileostomy and thus may experience a better quality of life. These results help further to establish ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as a safe, attractive, and valid alternative to Brooke ileostomy.     

Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective review was performed to determine the results after surgical reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileal pouch-anal procedures for ulcerative colitis and familial colonic polyposis at a university medical center. METHODS: During the 20-year period from 1978 to 1998, 601 patients underwent colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis, familial colonic polyposis, or Hirschsprung's disease. A J pouch was used for 351 patients, a lateral pouch for 221, an S pouch for 6, and a straight pull-through for 23. Acute complications after pouch construction have been detailed in previous publications and are not included in this study. Chronic pouch stasis with diarrhea, frequency, urgency, and soiling gradually became more severe in 164 patients (27.3%), associated with pouch enlargement, an elongated efferent limb, and obstruction to pouch outflow, largely related to the pouch configuration used during the authors' early clinical experience. These patients were sufficiently symptomatic to be considered for reconstruction (mean 68 months after IPAA). Transanal resection of an elongated IPAA spout was performed on 58 patients; abdominoperineal mobilization of the pouch with resection and tapering of the lower end (AP reconstruction) and ileoanal anastomosis on 83; pouch removal and new pouch construction on 7; and conversion of a straight pull-through to a pouch on 16. RESULTS: Good long-term results (mean 7.7 years) with improvement in symptoms occurred in 98% of transanal resections, 91.5% of AP reconstructions, 86% of new pouch constructions, and 100% of conversions of a straight pull-through to a pouch. The average number of bowel movements per 24 hours at 6 months was 4.8. Complications occurred in 11.6% of reconstructed patients. Five of the 164 patients (3.1%) required eventual pouch removal and permanent ileostomy. The high rate of pouch revision in this series of patients undergoing IPAA is due to a policy of aggressive correction when patients do not experience an optimal functional result, or have a progressive worsening of their status. CONCLUSIONS: Although occasionally a major undertaking, reconstruction of ileoanal pouches with progressive dysfunction due to large size or a long efferent limb has resulted in marked improvement in intestinal function in >93% of patients and has reduced the need for late pouch removal.     

Single lumen ileum with myectomy: a possible alternative to the pelvic reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy

An alternative procedure to construction of a pelvic ileal reservoir was assessed which avoids the need for a pouch, while providing an adequate rectal substitute and good continence. Thirty-six female adult beagles were allotted randomly to undergo total colectomy with (a) ileo-anal anastomosis alone, (b) ileo-anal anastomosis with two 15 cm myectomies, (c) ileo-anal anastomosis and myectomy with an ileo-ileal valve, or (d) ileo-anal anastomosis with a duplicated J pouch. The animals were studied before operation and at 4-weekly intervals for 20 weeks after operation. Mortality rates were similar. Ileal compliance was increased significantly by myectomy from 0.64 ml/mmHg (median, interquartile range 0.49-0.78) after ileo-anal anastomosis alone to 1.65 mmHg (1.16-1.93), P less than 0.01, an increase which was maintained. Ileal capacity was also increased both by myectomy and by the J pouch: ileo-anal anastomosis = 85 ml (75-100 ml), ileo-anal anastomosis and myectomy = 139 ml (116-156 ml), ileo-anal anastomosis and myectomy and ileo-ileal valve = 125 ml (range 85-145 ml), ileo-anal anastomosis and J pouch = 130 ml (range 75-165 ml) (P less than 0.01). Bowel function in the other three groups was markedly superior to ileo-anal anastomosis alone. Mean transit time was significantly less after ileo-anal anastomosis, 5.2 h (2.6-8.2 h) than after both ileo-anal anastomosis and myectomy, 10.5 h (9.6-13.9 h), P less than 0.05 and ileo-anal anastomosis and J pouch, 11.0 h (8.4-13.0 h), P less than 0.05, but addition of an ileo-ileal valve did not produce a further increase in transit time, 12.9 h (range 10.5-14.5 h), P = n.s.. Myectomy of single lumen ileum may be a useful alternative to a pelvic ileal reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy.     

Ileal "J" pouch-anal anastomosis. Clinical outcome.

One hundred eighty-eight patients undergoing abdominal colectomy with distal mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were reviewed to assess long-term functional results and to identify factors that might influence them. There was no postoperative mortality, but 10 patients (5.3%) required permanent ileostomy because of postoperative complications or the development of unsuspected Crohn's disease. Immediate postoperative complications, including pelvic sepsis, small bowel obstruction requiring surgery, anastomotic stricture, and ileostomy dysfunction, were observed in 11%, 9%, 14% and 9% of patients, respectively. No males were impotent but nine (9%) developed retrograde ejaculation. Pouchitis occurred in 8% of patients. Among 157 patients assessed at least 60 days after ileostomy closure (mean +/- SD, 375 +/- 216 days), all evacuated their neorectum spontaneously, and stool frequency was 6.0 +/- 2.6 daily and 1.2 +/- 1.3 nightly. While continence was generally good, 2.5% of patients during waking hours and 4.5% during sleep had occasional frank soilage. Moreover, seepage was noted in 25 and 47% of patients during daytime and nighttime, respectively. Both stool frequency and degree of continence improved with time. Patients less than 50 years of age and those with polyposis coli had fewer stools and better continence than those older than 50 or those with ulcerative colitis. It is concluded that ileal "J" pouch-anal anastomosis can be performed safely and will provide acceptable anorectal function without late deterioration.     

Enteric bacteriology, absorption, morphology and emptying after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The aim was to determine whether changes in enteric bacteriology, absorption, morphology, and emptying occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis, and to relate any changes to the clinical result. Twenty patients were studied 26 +/- 2 months (mean +/- s.e.m.) after operation. Eight patients had a good result, six a poor result, and six a history of recurrent pouch ileitis. Anaerobic and aerobic overgrowth occurred in the jejunum of patients with a poor result, but not in those with a good result or with pouch ileitis. In contrast, ileal pouch bacterial overgrowth occurred in all patients regardless of the clinical result. Patients with jejunal overgrowth had increased 24 h stool volume and stool nitrogen, but other patients did not. The larger the stool volume, the greater the anaerobic overgrowth. Pouch biopsies showed chronic inflammation in all patients, while 45 per cent had colonic metaplasia. Neither the inflammation nor the metaplasia correlated with the clinical result, nor did the clinical result correlate with the efficiency of pouch emptying. In conclusion, jejunal bacterial overgrowth after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was associated with an increased stool output, azotorrhoea, and a poor clinical result. A distinguishing bacterial, absorptive, morphological, or emptying abnormality was not found in patients with a history of recurrent pouch ileitis.