A phase II trial of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer

The primary aim of this phase II trial was to assess the antitumour activity of ZD0473 in ovarian cancer patients who had failed initial platinum-based therapy. Patients (n=94) were classified as either platinum-sensitive (n=35) or platinum-resistant (n=59) depending on whether they had relapsed or progressed within 26 weeks of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients initially received 120 mg/m² ZD0473 as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. If well tolerated, the dose could be escalated to 150 mg/m². Few patients (9%) withdrew because of treatment-related adverse events and no clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Objective response rates for platinum-resistant and sensitive patients were 8.3 and 32.4%, respectively, and clinical benefit was observed in 76.5% of the sensitive patients. Median time to progression was 57 and 180 days, and median time to death was 242 and 402 days, for resistant and sensitive patients, respectively. In conclusion, ZD0473 has a manageable toxicity profile and encouraging activity in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients.     

A phase I study of ZD0473 combined with paclitaxel for the treatment of solid malignancies

Purpose ZD0473 is a cytotoxic platinum agent, which in preclinical studies has exhibited synergistic activity when combined with paclitaxel. The aim of this open-label phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and antitumour activity of ZD0473 followed by paclitaxel in patients with refractory solid malignancies.Methods Patients received paclitaxel and ZD0473 on day 1 every 3 weeks. Seven dose levels were planned (ZD0473 60–180 mg/m², paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m²), with dose escalation dependent on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity.Results Included in the study were 23 patients who received 76 treatment cycles at dose levels 1 (60 mg/m² ZD0473, 135 mg/m² paclitaxel) to 6 (150 mg/m² ZD0473, 175 mg/m² paclitaxel). Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia (platelet count <25×10⁹/l) occurred in two of six patients at dose level 6, which defined the MTD. Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities included: anaemia (21.7%), neutropenia (39.1%), thrombocytopenia (34.8%), and leucopenia (34.8%). The most common grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities included: alopecia (13.0%), pleural effusion (13.0%), somnolence (8.7%), and vomiting (8.7%). Of the 23 patients, 11 (47.8%) had disease stabilization, including 4 with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had a 25% reduction in tumour dimensions.Conclusions ZD0473 combined with paclitaxel has a manageable tolerability profile and shows some evidence of antitumour activity in patients with NSCLC.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine in combination with patupilone in patients with advanced solid tumors

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy regimens including gemcitabine in combination with microtubule inhibitors such as docetaxel and paclitaxel have wide clinical application. Patupilone is a novel tubulin-polymerizing agent with activity against paclitaxel-resistant cell lines. We conducted a phase I trial to assess the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and antitumor activity of gemcitabine and patupilone. METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors enrolled in cohorts of three. Cohorts received fixed doses of gemcitabine (1,000 or 750 mg/m(2)) along with escalating doses of patupilone (1.5-3 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received a total of 99 courses of treatment on study. Hematologic toxicity in the first cohort required a modification of the protocol to decrease the gemcitabine dose. Subsequent patients received gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of patupilone from 1.5 to 3 mg/m(2). DLTs were grade 3 asthenia and grade 3 dehydration. There was also one treatment-related death due to neutropenic infection. Other clinically significant toxicities were persistent asthenia and persistent nausea. Four patients, one each with pancreatic cancer, esophageal carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma, experienced a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine and patupilone were asthenia and dehydration. Dose reductions also occurred due to persistent fatigue that was not dose-limiting. However, patients with advanced malignancies were able to tolerate gemcitabine and patupilone at doses that resulted in clinical benefit. The recommended phase II dose for this schedule is gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) and patupilone 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.     

Combination chemotherapy of carboplatin and gemcitabine against solid tumors: a phase I trial

Background. Some trials have suggested that the combination of gemcitabine and platinum compounds can have a synergistic effect on several solid tumors, but, at present, the data concerning carboplatin-gemcitabine combinations are not sufficient to allow the planning of phase II trials. The present phase I trial was planned to define the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of a carboplatin-gemcitabine combination. Methods. Thirty-two patients with advanced, pretreated solid tumors were treated with carboplatin on day 1 and gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The starting doses of carboplatin and gemcitabine were 3.5 mg/ml per min (area under the curve; AUC), and 600 mg/m², respectively. The doses of the two agents were alternately increased to 4, 4.5, and 5 mg/ml per min and to 800 and 960 mg/m², respectively. At each dose level, three patients were initially enrolled. If one of them experienced grade IV hematological toxicity or grade III–IV nonhematological toxicity (with the exception of alopecia), an additional three patients were enrolled at the same dose level. If two or more patients experienced grade IV hematological toxicity or grade III–IV non-hematological toxicity (with the exception of alopecia), the maximum tolerated dose was considered to have been reached, and the dose below this was recommended for further studies. All patients were evaluated weekly for toxicity and after every two courses of chemotherapy for response. Results. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematological, and the maximum tolerated doses were 4.5 mg/ml per min for carboplatin and 800 mg/m² for gemcitabine. The activity of the carboplatin/gemcitabine combination was encouraging, with a 21.9% response rate (7/32), three complete disease regressions, and a median time to progression of 30 weeks. The gemcitabine doses of day 15 or days 8 and 15 were omitted for hematological toxicity in 57 (50%) and 17 (14.9%) courses of chemotherapy, while no courses of chemotherapy were delayed for grade III–IV hematological or nonhematological toxicity. Conclusion. The maximum tolerated doses suggested by this trial are lower than those in other similar phase I trials, but they are consistent with those reported by most of the trials investigating gemcitabine either in combination with cisplatin or in heavily pretreated patients. Carboplatin 4.5 mg/ml per min on day 1 plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days may represent a promising schedule for further phase II trials. Received: January 29, 2001 / Accepted: September 13, 2001     

In vitro effects of combinations of cis-amminedichloro (2-methylpyridine) platinum (II) (ZD0473) with other novel anticancer drugs on the growth of SBC-3, a human small cell lung cancer cell line

Among numerous clinical regimens of combination chemotherapy, synergy has been observed to be particularly marked with combinations containing cisplatin (CDDP). However, the clinical use of CDDP has sometimes been limited by acquired resistance. The new-generation platinum drug, ZD0473, was synthesized with the aim of hindering the reaction of the drug with thiols, by the introduction of a 2-methylpyridine ligand. This enables the drug to exert antitumor activity against cisplatin-resistant cancer cells with elevated glutathione and/or metallothionein levels. The drug was also shown experimentally to overcome cisplatin resistance due to impaired drug accumulation, and enhanced DNA repair/tolerance to platinum-DNA adducts. We investigated the effects of combinations of ZD0473 with other anticancer drugs on the growth of a human small-cell lung cancer cell line (SBC-3). Six novel anticancer drugs were tested: docetaxel (TXT), paclitaxel (TXL), vinorelbine (VNB), irinotecan (CPT-11), gemcitabine (GEM) and pemetrexed (MTA). The growth inhibitory effect of the drugs was measured by MTT assay and the effects of the combination regimens were evaluated by the combination index analysis method developed by Chou and Talalay. Synergy was demonstrated for the combination regimens of ZD0473-GEM and ZD0473-TXL, while an additive effect was observed with combinations containing TXT, VNB, CPT-11 or MTA. In the case of the ZD0473-GEM combination, synergy was observed over a wide range of inhibition levels at dose ratios of 50:1, 100:1 and 250:1. The level of synergy was equivalent to that observed for combinations of CDDP-etoposide, CDDP-GEM and nedaplatin-CPT-11. The results suggest that the combination of ZD0473 with GEM merits further investigation in small cell lung cancer.     

A phase I trial of 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone in combination with gemcitabine for patients with advanced cancer

Purpose 3-Aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP), a new and potent inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase (RR), increases the cellular uptake, DNA incorporation, and cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in tumor cell lines. A phase I trial was initiated to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated doses of 3-AP and gemcitabine when used in combination in patients with advanced cancer.Study design 3-AP and gemcitabine were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Initially, 3-AP was infused over 2 h at a fixed dose of 105 mg/m². Gemcitabine was given over 30 min beginning no less than 1 and no more than 4 h after 3-AP. The first cohort received 3-AP alone in the first cycle. Subsequently, the gemcitabine dose was escalated beginning at 600 mg/m² in cohorts of three to six patients. Following the gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² dose level, the study was amended to determine if the 3-AP dose could be escalated above 105 mg/m².Results 3-AP at 105 mg/m² administered over 2 h followed in 1–4 h by gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² produced a toxicity profile similar to that expected for gemcitabine alone at the same dose. When the dose of 3-AP was escalated to 140 and 185 mg/m² administered over 2 h and subsequently over 4 h, acute hypotension, hypoxia, and EKG changes including non-specific ST-T wave changes and mild QT prolongation were observed, and one patient with underlying diffuse coronary artery disease had an asymptomatic myocardial infarction. 3-AP was shown to cause mild, reversible methemoglobinemia. Average end-of infusion serum concentrations for 3-AP at all doses were within the range capable of enhancing gemcitabine cytotoxicity in vitro. Gemcitabine plasma concentrations at end-of-infusion and elimination half-life were consistent with values reported in the literature. Among 22 evaluable patients, one complete response and two partial responses were observed, and an additional patient had prolonged stabilization of a large liver metastasis.Conclusions 3-AP at 105 mg/m² infused over 2–4 h followed by gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² on a days 1, 8, and 15 schedule every 28 days was generally well-tolerated and had a toxicity profile similar to that of gemcitabine alone. 3-AP produced mild to modest methemoglobinemia, which could cause acute symptoms in patients with limited pulmonary or cardiovascular reserve. The combination demonstrated antitumor activity and merits further exploration in phase II trials.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine administered as a 96-h continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced carcinoma and lymphoma

Background and objective Preclinical data suggest gemcitabine may have schedule-dependent activity fovoring prolonged infusion. We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) and toxicity of gemcitabine when given as a continuous intravenous (CIVI) over 96 h. Patients and methods Gemcitabine was initially given at 1 mg/m²/d for 48, then, 72, and finally 96 h. The dose was then increased to 2, 4, 6, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mg/m²/d. Dose levels of 7, 8, 9 mg/m²/d as 96-h infusion were added later after a protocol modification. After identifying the RPTD using an every 3-wk schedule. we then evaluated the feasibility of repeating the infusion every 2 wk, and then weekly for 3 of 4 wk. Results Thirty-four patients with a variety of tumor types received a total of 126 cycles of therapy (median of 2 cycles, range 1–10 cycles). The RPTD, was 8 mg/m²/d every 3 wk, and 6 mg/m²/d every 2 wk. The most common grade 2 or higher toxicities at all dose levels (>- grade 2) included fever (n=14), dyspnea (n=7). mucositis (n=6), hypotension (n=6), nausea/vomiting (n=6), and fatigue (n=5). Neutropeni and/or thrombocytopenia were uncommon. Conclusion A dministration of gemcitabine as a 96-h infusion results in a markedly different toxicity profile and RPTD than when given by a conventional 30-min infusion. The RPTD was 8 mg/m²/d (32 mg/m²/course) when given every 3 wk, or 6 mg/m²/d (24 mg/m²/course) when given every 2 wk.     

A phase II study of ZD0473 given as a short infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trial, IND 129.

BACKGROUND: ZD0473 is a new generation platinum compound with activity against a wide range of human tumor cell lines and xenografts, including carboplatin- and cisplatin-resistant lines. A phase II study of ZD0473 in advanced breast cancer was initiated by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with metastatic breast cancer, measurable disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to two, and a maximum of one prior cytotoxic agent for recurrent disease were enrolled and treated at 120 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. After 13 patients were enrolled, the dose was increased to 150 mg/m(2) on the basis of emergent data from studies ongoing at the time. RESULTS: Thirty-three women were evaluable for toxicity and 26 patients for response. Toxicity was mainly hematological with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 12 of 20 patients (60%) treated at 150 mg/m(2) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in three of 13 patients (23%) at 120 mg/m(2). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 15 patients (75%) at 150 mg/m(2) and two patients (10%) at 120 mg/m(2). Non-hematological toxicities were generally mild or moderate. There was one partial response seen for a response rate of 3.8% (95% confidence interval 0.1% to 19.5%) and stable disease in 15 patients. CONCLUSION: ZD0473 has minor activity as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer. Combinations with other drugs including docetaxel are ongoing and may be of interest.     

Erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors: phase IB trial

Purpose The purpose of this phase IB trial was to evaluate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity of erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors. Patients and methods Patients included those with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma or other malignancies potentially responsive to gemcitabine. In the escalating phase of the trial, patients were enrolled in sequential cohorts using 100 or 150 mg oral daily dosing of erlotinib. Gemcitabine dose was 1,000 mg/m² weekly ×7 (first cycle), then weekly ×3, every 4 weeks. Results Twenty-six patients completed at least one course on study. In Cohort IA, at the 100 mg/day dose of erlotinib, three patients have developed grade 3 transaminase elevations. After stricter inclusion criteria were adopted (Cohort IB), no additional events of grade 3 transaminase elevations were observed and the dose of erlotinib was escalated to 150 mg/day (Cohorts IB and IIB) without reaching dose-limiting toxicities. The most common toxicities included diarrhea, skin rash, fatigue and neutropenia. The pharmacokinetic analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between erlotinib and gemcitabine. Objective responses were seen in two patients: cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer (n = 15) had a median progression-free survival of 289 days, the estimated overall survival of 389 days (12.5 months), and a 1-year survival rate of 51%. Conclusion The 150 mg/day dose of erlotinib can be safely administered in combination with standard dose gemcitabine in selected patients with pancreatic cancer and other advanced solid tumors. Promising antitumor activity has been observed in patients with pancreatic cancer. Data were previously presented at the 40th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 12–15, 2004.     

Phase I clinical trial of intrathecal gemcitabine in patients with neoplastic meningitis

PURPOSE: A phase I study of intrathecal (IT) gemcitabine was performed to define a safe dose and characterize the toxicity profile and CSF pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its major metabolite 2',2'-difluoro-deoxyuridine (dFdU) in patients 3 years of age and older with neoplastic meningitis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Gemcitabine was administered via Ommaya reservoir or lumbar puncture at three dose levels: 5 mg weekly, 5 mg twice-weekly, and 10 mg twice-weekly using a standard phase I dose escalation design. Serial CSF samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic studies in seven patients with Ommaya reservoirs. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic studies were also obtained from three patients. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled in this study. Significant neurological toxicities occurred in two patients including myelitis in a patient at the 5 mg twice-weekly dose level and somnolence in a patient at the 10 mg twice-weekly dose level. No complete responses were seen; however, three patients had stable disease. Gemcitabine was rapidly eliminated from the CSF with a terminal half-life of 61 +/- 50 min. No gemcitabine or dFdU was detected in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: IT gemcitabine was associated with significant neurotoxicity; therefore, its further development for IT use is not recommended.     

A phase I human trial of mitoguazone and gemcitabine sequential bi-weekly treatment of cancer patients

Our previous studies have demonstrated the existence of synergism in a combination therapy using mitoguazone and gemcitabine when the mitoguazone is administered 24 hours before gemcitabine. Based on the cell culture and animal experimental results, a phase I clinical trial was performed in order to determine the toxicity of the combined treatment. Mitoguazone and gemcitabine were administered sequentially: mitoguazone on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 2. This cycle was repeated every 2 weeks. The dosages of these two drugs were varied between patients. Ten patients were enrolled in the study. Six patients began treatment at dose level 1 (mitoguazone 500 mg/m², gemcitabine 1500 mg/m²), three at dose level 2 (mitoguazone 500 mg/m², gemcitabine 2000 mg/m²), and one at dose level 3 (mitoguazone 600 mg/m², gemcitabine 2000 mg/m²). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was only observed in two patients treated at dose level 1 and one patient treated at dose level 3, while all the other patients only experienced nonhematologic toxicity, such as asthenia and mucositis. Two melanoma patients showed responses (one partial and one minor) to the treatment. One lymphoma patient also showed a brief partial response. This phase I trial indicated that the combination of mitoguazone and gemcitabine had limited but noticeable activity for treatment of cancer patients. Further study on the toxicity and on the effect of the scheduled mitoguazone-gemcitabine combination is needed.     

Phase I dose escalation study of docetaxel with a fixed dose of S-1 in combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Background  The primary objectives of this study were to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel in combination with a fixed dose of S-1 and to determine the recommended dose (RD). Patients and methods  Patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma with metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease were eligible. Patients received intravenous docetaxel starting at 40 mg/m² (dose level 1), and stepwise dose increases to 50, 60, and 70 mg/m² were planned for successive patient cohorts (dose levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively) over 1 h on day 1 and oral S-1 administered at a fixed dose of 40 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14, both drugs every 21 days. Results  A total of 13 patients were enrolled into this trial. All three patients at dose level 3 developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and this level was declared to be the MTD. Hence, level 2 (docetaxel 50 mg/m²) was declared to be the RD for the next study. As 9 of the 13 enrolled patients responded to treatment, the overall objective response rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 44.1–94.3%). The median time to progression was 8.38 months (range 1.44–8.51) and the overall survival duration was 9.9 months (range 0.62–11.57). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity of docetaxel plus S-1 was neutropenia, which was tolerable and manageable. Conclusion  This regimen showed encouraging activity and a manageable safety profile in advanced gastric carcinoma and could be used in further randomized studies.     

A phase I dose escalation study using simultaneous integrated-boost IMRT with temozolomide in patients with unifocal glioblastoma

PurposeTo evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of simultaneous integrated-boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) associated with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma.Patients and methodsBetween November 2009 and January 2012, nine patients with malignant glioma were enrolled in this phase I clinical trial. Radiotherapy was delivered using fractions of 2.5 Gy on the planning target volume b and of 1.9 Gy on the planning target volume a. Volumes were defined as follow: gross tumour volume b: tumour taking up contrast on T1 weighted MRI images; clinical target volume b: gross tumour volume b + 0.5 cm (adapted to the anatomical structures) and lastly planning target volume b: clinical target volume b + 0.5 cm; gross tumour volume a: tumour (gross tumour volume b) + 2 cm and including oedema outlined on T2Flair MRI sequences; clinical target volume a gross tumour volume a + 0.5 cm (adapted to the anatomical structures); planning target volume a: clinical target volume a + 0.5 cm. Three patients were enrolled at each of the three levels of dose (70, 75 and 80 Gy prescribed on the planning target volume b and 56, 60 and 60.8 Gy on the planning target volume a). Radiotherapy was delivered with temozolomide according to the standard protocol. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any haematological toxicities at least grade 4 or as any radiotherapy-related non-haematological acute toxicities at least grade 3, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.ResultsUntil the last dose level of 80 Gy, no patient showed dose-limiting toxicity.ConclusionsSIB-IMRT, at least until a dose of 80 Gy in 32 daily fractions, associated with temozolomide is feasible and well tolerated.     

A Phase 1 dose-escalation trial of glufosfamide in combination with gemcitabine in solid tumors including pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Absract Purpose To evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics and to establish the maximum tolerated dose of glufosfamide when administered in combination with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors. Methods This Phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated the combination of glufosfamide + gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with glufosfamide doses from 1,500 to 4,500 mg/m² IV over 4 h on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² IV over 30 min on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Detailed PK sampling was performed on days 1 and 8 of the first two cycles. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicity: Grade 3 fatigue at 2,500 mg/m² and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia at 4,500 mg/m². Five patients completed six cycles and one patient remained on study for ten cycles. Two patients discontinued for adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in seven patients and five patients, respectively. The CrCL fell below 60 mL/min in two patients. There was one unconfirmed partial response and 10 of 19 (52.6%) patients had stable disease or better at 8 weeks and three patients had continuing stable disease at 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetic analyses suggest no interaction between glufosfamide and gemcitabine. Conclusion Phase I data indicate that full dose glufosfamide (4,500 mg/m²) can be given safely in combination with gemcitabine. A Phase II study in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is ongoing. Presented in part at the 2006 ASCO Gastrointestinal Symposium. Research supported by Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.     

A single-institute phase I/II trial combining nedaplatin dose escalation with a fixed dose of docetaxel for induction chemotherapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma

The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel plus nedaplatin induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Twenty-one patients were enrolled in this phase I/II clinical study. The toxicities, response rates, and the maximum tolerated dose of nedaplatin that could be safely given preoperatively were assessed. Patients received escalating doses of nedaplatin (60, 70, 80, 90 mg/m²) combined with a fixed dose of docetaxel (60 mg/m²) on day one. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), grade 4 leukopenia lasting for two days or more, was seen in one patient at dose level 3; no other DLT was observed at any dose level. The overall response rate was 66.7%. The response rate was 100% at nedaplatin dose level 4, while that at dose level 1 was low (33.3%). Given these results, the recommended dose of nedaplatin in this regimen combined with fixed dose docetaxel (60 mg/m²) was determined to be 90 mg/m². Docetaxel 60 mg/m² plus nedaplatin 90 mg/m² induction chemotherapy can be recommended for patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. Based on these results, an early phase II clinical study using this dose level was conducted; docetaxel plus nedaplatin induction chemotherapy appears to be a useful regimen for the treatment of OSCC. A late phase II clinical study is warranted.     

Phase I trial of gefitinib with concurrent radiotherapy and fixed 2-h gemcitabine infusion, in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancers are resistant to radiotherapy (RT) and current chemotherapy agents. Epidermal growth factor receptor is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and in vitro studies have shown that epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors can overcome radio- and chemoresistance. The aim of the study was to determine whether the addition of gefitinib to RT and gemcitabine for patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) was feasible and safe. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with pathologically proven LAPC, based on major vascular invasion based on helical computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound, were entered into the study. The targeted irradiated volume included the tumor and 2-cm margin. Prophylactic irradiation of regional nodes was not allowed. Patients with >500 cm(3) of planning tumor volume were excluded. An initial cohort of 6 patients was treated with RT (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) plus concomitant gefitinib (250 mg/day). Successive cohorts of patients received 100, 150, and 200 mg/m(2)/day of gemcitabine in a 2-h infusion over Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 with gefitinib (250 mg/day) and RT. Gefitinib was continued after RT until progression. A pharmacodynamic study of angiogenic markers was also performed to evaluate a possible antiangiogenic effect. RESULTS: There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Common toxicities were mild neutropenia, asthenia, diarrhea, cutaneous rash and nausea/vomiting. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival was 3.7 (95% CI = 1.9-5.5) months, and the median overall survival was 7.5 (95% CI = 5.2-9.9) months. No significant reduction of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8 was observed after treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results support that the combination of gefitinib, RT, and gemcitabine has an acceptable toxicity but with modest activity in LAPC.     

Induction of apoptosis by the ADEPT agent ZD2767: comparison with the classical nitrogen mustard chlorambucil and a monofunctional ZD2767 analogue

ZD2767P is a phenol mustard glutamate prodrug which is currently being developed for Antibody Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (ADEPT). In ZD2767 ADEPT an active bi-functional alkylating drug, ZD2767D (4-[N,N-bis(2-iodoethyl)amino]phenol), is generated following cleavage of ZD2767P by the bacterial enzyme carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2) which is targeted to the tumour by conjugation to the F(ab')(2)fragment of the anti-CEA antibody A5B7. The aim of the studies described here was to identify the mode of cell death induced by ZD2767P + CPG2 in comparison to the established nitrogen mustard chlorambucil. The contribution of bifunctional and monofunctional ZD2767 DNA lesions to cell death induction was investigated using a monofunctional ZD2767D analogue. Apoptosis in LoVo tumour cells was studied by three different methods (nuclear morphology, annexin V staining and TUNEL). Levels of apoptosis detected using the three assays were similar, and each drug treatment produced apoptosis at levels above those in control cells at concentrations which resulted in tumour cell growth inhibition. The bi-functional compounds, ZD2767P + CPG2 and chlorambucil, induced apoptosis in a concentration and time dependent manner, with equitoxic concentrations producing equivalent levels of apoptosis. In contrast, the mono-functional ZD2767D analogue at 100 microM resulted in the maximal level of apoptosis at 25 h with no further increase over the following 72 h. These studies have demonstrated that apoptosis is the mechanism of cell death induced by the ZD2767 ADEPT system, and that levels of apoptosis produced by ZD2767 are similar to those observed at equitoxic concentrations of the classical nitrogen mustard chlorambucil. The mono-functional ZD2767 analogue also induced apoptosis, but with a different time course and characteristics. In conjunction with previous data, these studies have shown that the potent activity of ZD2767 can be attributed to the ability of the compound to induce bifunctional DNA lesions and engage apoptosis.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine given by 24-h hepatic arterial infusion

PurposeThis study was performed to assess the toxicities, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the pharmacokinetics and the anti-tumour activity of gemcitabine given by 24-h hepatic arterial infusion (HAI).Patients and methodsPatients with liver malignancies received gemcitabine by 24-h HAI, weekly × 3, every 4 weeks. On day 1 or day 8 of the first cycle, patients received one administration by 24-h intravenous infusion for pharmacokinetic comparison and to determine hepatic extraction.ResultsThirteen patients received gemcitabine at the dose levels of 75, 135 and 180 mg/m². The MTD was 180 mg/m² with thrombocytopaenia as the dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a significantly lower maximum gemcitabine plasma concentration (C_max: HAI, 26, 80 and 128 nM, respectively; IV, 229, 264 and 293 nM, respectively) and area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve (AUC_0–24h: HAI, 386, 1247 and 2033 nmol × h/L, respectively; IV, 3526, 4818 and 5363 nmol × h/L, respectively) during HAI, compared with intravenous infusion (both P < 0.001). Additionally, the mean hepatic extraction ratios of gemcitabine at the 75, 135 and 180 mg/m² dose level were 0.89, 0.75 and 0.55, respectively. Hepatic extraction decreased linearly with increasing dose. The C_max and AUC_0–24h of 2′,2′-difluoro-2′-deoxyuridine, the deaminated product of gemcitabine, were similar for HAI and intravenous infusion. Seven patients had stable disease for a median duration of 9 months (range: 2–11 months).ConclusionsGemcitabine given by 24-h HAI was well tolerated and resulted in significantly lower systemic gemcitabine plasma concentrations than intravenous infusion due to a relatively high hepatic extraction.     

A triplet chemotherapy with cisplatin, docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study

Purpose We conducted a phase I/II study of triplet chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (CDDP), docetaxel (DCT) and gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Fifty-three untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. All drugs were given on days 1 and 8. The doses of CDDP and DCT were fixed at 40 mg/m² and 30 mg/m², respectively. In the phase I portion, a dose escalation study of GEM with starting dose of 400 mg/m² was conducted and primary objective in the phase II portion was response rate. Results The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of GEM were determined as 800 mg/m² because grade 3 non-hematological toxicity (liver damage, diarrhea, and fatigue) developed in three of nine patients evaluated at that dose level. In pharmacokinetic analysis, C _max and AUC of dFdC and dFdU were increased along with the dose escalation of GEM. However, no relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity or response was observed. Objective response rate was 34% and median survival time was 11.7 months. Though major toxicity was myelosuppression, there were no life-threatening toxicities. Conclusion These results indicate that this triplet chemotherapy is feasible and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.