共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
两种压疮危险评估表预测效果的比较研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
[目的]测量并比较Waterlow压疮危险评估表和Braden修订版压疮危险评估表的预测效果。[方法]分别用两种评估表对332例病人进行评分,分析不同临界值时敏感性、特异性、阳性预测价值、阴性预测价值。[结果]Braden修订版压疮危险评估表以19分为临界值、Waterlow压疮危险评估表以15分为临界值时敏感性、特异性、阳性预测价值、阴性预测价值等指标间能达到较好的平衡,且Braden修订版压疮危险评估表各指标均大于Waterlow压疮危险评估表;Braden修订版压疮危险评估表的ROC曲线下面积略高于waterlow压疮危险评估表。[结论]Braden修订版压疮危险评估表和Waterlow压疮危险评估表都有较好的预测效果,尤其以Braden修订版效果更优。 相似文献
2.
[目的]测量并比较Waterlow压疮危险评估表和Braden修订版压疮危险评估表的预测效果。[方法]分别用两种评估表对332例病人进行评分,分析不同临界值时敏感性、特异性、阳性预测价值、阴性预测价值。[结果]Braden修订版压疮危险评估表以19分为临界值、Waterlow压疮危险评估表以15分为临界值时敏感性、特异性、阳性预测价值、阴性预测价值等指标间能达到较好的平衡,且Braden修订版压疮危险评估表各指标均大于Waterlow压疮危险评估表;Braden修订版压疮危险评估表的ROC曲线下面积略高于Waterlow压疮危险评估表。[结论]Braden修订版压疮危险评估表和Waterlow压疮危险评估表都有较好的预测效果,尤其以Braden修订版效果更优。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
ICU病人压疮危险因素及其评估工具 总被引:33,自引:1,他引:32
ICU病人是压疮的高发人群,同时存在多种危险因素,且彼此相互影响.在压疮危险因素评估方面,国外的研究较多,但目前没有一个量表被严谨的科学研究证明在ICU内应用有较高的效度和信度.国内医护人员对压疮的评估和预防还处于经验性的决策阶段. 相似文献
6.
目的:制定针对手术患者的压疮危险因素评估量表,使手术室压疮护理有科学的评价工具。方法:在文献回顾和专家访谈的基础上,结合临床实践经验,确立备选指标,通过专家会议法自行设计第一轮专家函询问卷,采用德尔菲法对30名专家进行3轮函询。结果:手术患者压疮危险因素评估量表一级指标有患者因素、手术因素、麻醉因素,二级指标分别包括年龄、体质指数(体重/身高2)、受压点皮肤类型、活动能力、神经感觉障碍;手术体位、手术预计时间、术中施加外力、失血量;麻醉方式等。结论:采用手术患者压疮危险因素评估量表对手术患者进行术前评估,依据量表评分采取科学、合理、具有针对性的压疮预防措施,有利于减少围手术期压疮发生率,提高手术患者生活质量。 相似文献
7.
ICU病人压疮危险因素及其评估工具 总被引:25,自引:1,他引:25
ICU病人是压疮的高发人群,同时存在多种危险因素,且彼此相互影响。在压疮危险因素评估方面,国外的研究较多,但目前没有一个量表被严谨的科学研究证明在ICU内应用有较高的效度和信度。国内医护人员对压疮的评估和预防还处于经验性的决策阶段。 相似文献
8.
潘富群 《实用临床医药杂志》2015,(6)
目的术中压疮护理在手术压疮高危患者护理中的应用研究。方法选取本院进行手术的压疮高危患者106例,根据患者接受手术时间的先后分为实验组和对照组各53例,实验组患者术中给予压疮护理措施,对照组患者则遵医嘱给予常规手术护理。结果实验组患者术中压疮的发生率低于对照组,实验组患者手术室护理服务满意率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论术中压疮护理可降低术中压疮的发生率,提升患者对手术室护理工作的满意度。 相似文献
9.
目的对约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表汉化并进行信效度分析,确定其应用价值,为我国住院患者提供有效的跌倒评估工具。方法采用分层随机抽样方法抽取浙江省1所三级甲等综合医院成年住院患者400例,由2名研究者运用中文版约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险量表独立对同一例患者进行测定并进行信效度分析。结果中文版约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表总的Cronbach’sα系数为0.791,剔除当前条目后量表Cronbach’sα系数在0.649~0.703,评定者间信度r=0.949,探索性因素分析提取的4个公因子累积方差贡献率为62.437%。结论中文版约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表具有较好的信度和效度,可用于我国住院患者的跌倒风险评估。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
Evaluating content validity and test-retest reliability of the children's health risk behavior scale
Riesch SK Anderson LS Angresano N Canty-Mitchell J Johnson DL Krainuwat K 《Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)》2006,23(4):366-372
OBJECTIVE: Describe the instrument development process and report the validity and reliability of the Children's Health Risk Behavior Scale (CHRBS), a scale designed to screen for health risk behaviors among youth aged 10-13 Years. METHODS: Domain identification and item generation using the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and testing relevance and test-retest reliability among a target audience sample of 77 fifth graders in their classrooms in two separate public school districts. RESULTS: Youth performed their tasks as expert item reviewers effectively. Twenty-one items comprise the CHRBS with a reading level determined to be at the third grade. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a reliable and valid measure to assess late elementary youth's participation in health risk behavior. 相似文献
13.
14.
FIONA HAMILTON 《Journal of clinical nursing》1992,1(4):185-193
- ? The purpose of this analysis was to determine which pressure sore risk-assessment scale was the most valid and reliable for use outside the elderly setting.
- ? It includes a review of the causes of pressure sores to determine the factors which should be included in a scoring system, an overview of the risk-assessment scales developed and an analysis of the research performed to test their validity and reliability.
- ? The study has shown that the Gosnell, Knoll, and Douglas scales have had little or no validity studies conducted and should therefore not be used in the clinical setting and the Pressure Sore Prediction Score should be used with caution outside an orthopaedic setting. The Waterlow scale has also not been fully validated and the Norton scale requires further validation to make it applicable to patients outside the elderly setting. The Norton scale has been shown to overpredict the risk of pressure sores, but the Waterlow scale may actually overpredict this risk even more.
- ? The Braden scale appears to be the most appropriate to use because it has been tested on a representative sample of patients with a wide age range (14–102). It also has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 64–90% compared with the Norton scale's sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 36%.
- ? The analysis concludes that more research is required on all of the scales to determine validity and reliability outside of the elderly setting and therefore all scales should be used with caution bearing in mind the limitations of each.
15.
[目的]本研究旨在描述及确定用于ICU病人最有效的压疮危险因素预测量表。[方法]采用系统性文献回顾方法全面检索1996年—2010年相关文献,数据库包括Medline,CINAHL,Journals@Ovid,Science Direct及中文CAJ。共检出有效研究论文11篇,8篇英文,3篇中文;分析、比较和检视4个常用于ICU病人的压疮危险因素预测量表的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值以及各自最佳临界值。[结果]Braden量表为最常用于ICU病人压疮危险因素预测量表,但临界值设定各异;方差分析结果4个量表的4项预测指标之间无统计学意义。Cubbin&Jackson量表的敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均高于其他3个量表。[结论]虽然Braden量表在国内外均较为常用,但Cubbin&Jackson量表是专门为ICU病人而设置,有较好的预测能力及较固定的临界值,但需要在中国人群中作进一步的验证。 相似文献
16.
目的编制护护关系量表,并检验其信效度,为进一步研究护护关系提供可靠测量工具。方法编制具有4个维度26个条目的初始量表,选取某地区3所医院的174名护士进行预调查,收集的数据用来进行项目分析和探索性因子分析,选取护士372名作为正式调查对象,对问卷的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度进行检验。结果确定量表包含4个维度21个条目,量表总体Cronbach'sα系数为0.904,4个维度的Cronbach'sα系数0.839~0.909;两周后重测,总体量表、各维度和各个条目的重测信度均在0.7以上;验证性因子分析显示,除AGFI外,其余各拟合指标均在要求范围内。结论编制的护护关系量表具有良好的信度与效度,可以作为研究护护关系的可靠测量工具。 相似文献
17.
18.
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the relevance of serum albumin and serum sodium as predictors of pressure sores in addition to the Waterlow score. DESIGN: Observational study of patients at risk of developing decubitus ulcers. SETTING: Staffordshire, in the midlands of the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 773 elderly hospital in-patients of a district general hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Waterlow scores and serum albumin and sodium. Development of a pressure sore. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis of serum albumin, serum sodium and the Waterlow score showed the Waterlow score and serum albumin were significant predictors of pressure sores. CONCLUSIONS: Serum albumin may, in this patient group (in-patients over 64 years of age), be a useful predictor of pressure sore occurrence, though further work is needed to establish whether this is the case. Risk assessment of pressure sores can possibly be improved by adding serum albumin to one of the pre-existing tools such as the Waterlow score. 相似文献
19.
目的了解居家长期照护老年人发生压疮情况及发生压疮风险因素。方法采用分层整群抽样法对909例老年人进行一般人口学资料调查及采用日常生活活动能力量表、工具性日常生活活动能力量表、Norton量表等对其进行测评,分析各相关因素对压疮发生的影响。结果居家长期照护老年人压疮发生率为25.8%;压疮的好发部位为骶尾部、髋部和足跟部;卧床分级、工具性日常生活活动能力和Norton量表压疮发生危险因素是压疮发生的重要影响因素。结论居家长期护理老年人压疮发生率较高,在社区和居家护理中需采取相对应的预防和干预策略。 相似文献