Diagnostic laparoscopy and diverting sigmoid loop colostomy in the management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot injuries

BACKGROUND: This prospective study reviews the management of isolated civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot injuries using a protocol of diagnostic laparoscopy and abdominal wall trephine diverting loop colostomy, without laparotomy, distal rectal washout and presacral drainage. METHODS: Patients admitted to the trauma unit at Groote Schuur Hospital between January 2000 and December 2002 with a rectal injury were evaluated. A rectal injury was confirmed by digital rectal examination and proctosigmoidoscopy. Missile peritoneal violation was excluded by diagnostic laparoscopy. Normal laparoscopy was followed by creation of a diverting sigmoid loop colostomy through an abdominal wall trephine, without a laparotomy. No distal rectal washout or presacral drainage was performed. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients admitted with 106 rectal injuries, 20 (19.2 per cent) qualified for inclusion in the study. All had sustained low-velocity gunshot injuries of which 18 exhibited a transpelvic trajectory. Diagnostic laparoscopy was normal and a trephine diverting loop sigmoid colostomy was performed in all 20 patients. No pelvic sepsis occurred. Two patients developed rectocutaneous fistulas, both of which resolved without surgical treatment. Nineteen stomas have since been closed. CONCLUSION: Low-velocity gunshot injuries isolated to the extraperitoneal rectum can be managed safely by laparoscopic exclusion of intraperitoneal missile penetration and diverting sigmoid loop colostomy, without laparotomy, distal rectal washout or presacral drainage     

Surgical treatment of extraperitoneal rectal and perineal injuries

The aim of this study was to analyse the results of the treatment of extraperitoneal rectal and perineal injuries for 153 patients. All the patients were examined according to the scheme. Therapeutic-diagnostic algorithm was developed for perineal, anal, rectal injuries. Wide opening and drainage of the wound was used. The method allows to avoid colostomy and its subsequent operative closing in extraperitoneal injury of the rectum. The method of surgical treatment is recommended in extraperitoneal rectal and perineal injuries.     

Unusual extraperitoneal rectal injuries: a retrospective study

Purpose  

Rectal injuries, which are rarely encountered because of the anatomic characteristics, occur due to penetrating traumas. In the current study, we aimed to present experiences gleaned from our clinic concerning rarely encountered unusual rectal injuries, including those cases presented for the first time.     

Management of rectal injuries

We have reviewed the management of twentynine casualties with rectal injuries terated in Vietnam. A high incidence of virulent complications and a 22.2 per cent mortality occurred in eighteen casualties treated by conventional means with a divided sigmoid colostomy, rectal repair when feasible, and presacral drainage. The complications and deaths were invariably related to pelvic sepsis. Distal washout to prevent continued contamination from fecal material remaining in the defunctionalized rectosigmoid was employed in ten casualties in addition to the conventional measures. This resulted in a striking reduction in complications and no mortality. We also stress the importance of prompt diagnosis, direct control of hemorrhage, proper management of associated injuries, and adequate debridement.     

Management of penetrating lung injuries in civilian practice

Recent reports of military thoracic injuries have advocated early thoracotomy and aggressive management of pulmonary injuries with resection as opposed to the more conservative and traditional treatment with chest tube thoracostomy. A retrospective study was therefore performed to determine the incidence of thoracotomy and lung resection in civilian injuries and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of these injuries. Between 1973 and 1985, in a series of 1,168 patients, there were 384 gunshot wounds and 784 stab wounds to the thorax. Two hundred eighty-three patients with a gunshot wound (74%) and 602 with a stab wound (77%) were treated with chest tubes alone. Sixty-eight patients (6% of the total) required operative repair of pulmonary hilar or parenchymal injury. Pulmonary resection was necessary in only 18 patients (nine with a gunshot wound and nine with a stab wound), and 10 patients had repair of hilar injuries (nine with a gunshot wound and one with a stab wound). Of patients requiring pulmonary resection, nine required wedge or segmental resection, six required lobectomy, and three patients required pneumonectomy. Mortality for all thoracic injuries was 2.3%: for those treated with chest tube alone, 0.7%; for pulmonary hilar injuries, 30%; for pulmonary parenchymal injuries, 8.6%; and for injuries necessitating lung resection, 28%. Most civilian lung injuries can be treated by tube thoracostomy alone. Although relatively few patients with primary pulmonary injury require thoracotomy, those that do are at significant risk and may require lung resection to control bleeding or hemoptysis or to remove destroyed or devitalized lung tissue.     

Rectal gunshot wounds. Management of civilian injuries

The diagnosis and operative management of 43 consecutive low velocity wounds of the rectum were evaluated with regard to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Rectal and proctoscopic examinations, although frequently positive (80% and 91%, respectively), were not uniformly reliable in making the preoperative diagnosis. Diversion of the fecal stream by colostomy occupies a key role in operative management. Loop colostomy appears not only as efficacious as end colostomy and mucus fistula, but also requires less time to perform and subsequently close. Distal rectal washout is an important adjunct which reduces the incidence of rectal and intra-abdominal infectious complications. Civilian and military wounds of the rectum appear to differ in terms of the postoperative complications, mortality rate, and management techniques.     

Errors and complications in the diagnosis and treatment of extraperitoneal rectal injuries

On the basis of observations of 11 patients with extraperitoneal injuries of the rectum the authors give recommendations on diagnosis and treatment. Operations on patients with extraperitoneal injuries should be completed by creation of the unnatural anus.     

Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all?

One hundred consecutive patients with injuries to the extraperitoneal rectum were treated over a ten-year period at an urban trauma center. The mechanisms of injury included firearms in 82 patients, stab wounds in 3 patients, a variety of other penetrating injuries in 10 patients, and in 5 patients the injuries resulted from blunt trauma. Treatment of the rectal injury was determined by the bias of the operating surgeon, the condition of the patient, and the magnitude of the rectal injury. Proximal loop colostomies were performed in 44 patients, diverting colostomies in 51 patients, Hartmann's procedure in 4 patients, and an abdominoperineal resection in 1 patient. Extraperitoneal rectal perforations were closed in 21 patients and the rectum was irrigated free of feces in 46 patients. Transperineal, presacral drainage was used in 93 patients. Infectious complications potentially related to the management of the rectal wound occurred in 11 patients (11%) and included abdominal or pelvic abscesses (4 patients), wound infections (6 patients), rectocutaneous fistulas (3 patients), and missile tract infections (2 patients). Four patients (4%) died as a result of their injuries. Of the therapeutic options available, statistical analysis revealed that only the failure to drain the presacral space increased the likelihood of infectious complications (p = 0.03); however, as it could not be determined with certainty that the use of, or failure to use, any particular therapeutic option had an effect on the risk of death. It is concluded that colostomy and drainage are the foundations of the successful treatment of civilian injuries to the extraperitoneal rectum. The use of adjuncts such as diverting colostomies, repair of the rectal wound, and irrigation of the rectum has little effect on mortality and morbidity.     

MRI of extraperitoneal rectal carcinoma

Last years technological developments in imaging field have made a substantial contribution to diagnosis and staging of rectal cancer. Endorectal ultrasound and MRI with endorectal coil are very useful in rectal cancer initial staging thanks to their ability to distinguish between the rectal wall layers. Major ultrasound limitations are presence of inflammations, desmoplastic reaction and small field of view which limits evaluation of perirectal invasion. MRI with phased-array coils, instead, allows depiction of mesorectum and to assess the distance between tumor and mesorectal fascia. Unfortunately CT shows low accuracy compared to MRI in local staging because it fails to distinguish the rectal wall layers. The criterion used in assessing nodal involvement remains unfortunately still the dimensional one even if new contrast media based on nano-iron particles look promising in this regard On reassessment after chemo-radiotherapy treatment, MRI proved to be a very accurate tool thanks to its ability to detect tumor downstaging, disappearance of mesorectal fascia infiltration or even to show a complete response. The presence of recurrence can be studied by contrast enhanced perfusion-MRI or with good accuracy using PET which, however, presents major technical limitations at present.     

A new approach to extraperitoneal rectal injuries: laparoscopy and diverting loop sigmoid colostomy

BACKGROUND: Current management of extraperitoneal rectal injuries involves a laparotomy and diversion of the fecal stream. In this study, we review our experience with laparoscopy and diverting loop sigmoid colostomy without laparotomy in the management of these injuries. METHODS: All patients admitted to the trauma unit at Groote Schuur Hospital between January 1995 and May 2000 with a rectal injury were evaluated. The presence of a rectal injury was confirmed by rectal examination and proctosigmoidoscopy. Intraperitoneal injuries were excluded by laparoscopy. Only patients who did not have intraperitoneal injuries were included in the study. The patients were then managed with a diverting loop sigmoid colostomy created through an abdominal wall trephine without laparotomy. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the study. In eight patients, laparoscopy excluded intraperitoneal injuries. All 10 patients had a diverting loop sigmoid colostomy fashioned. There were no complications related to either the rectal injury or colostomy. Nine stomas have since been closed. CONCLUSION: In patients with isolated extraperitoneal rectal injuries, laparoscopic exclusion of intraperitoneal injuries, followed by a diverting loop sigmoid colostomy, is a feasible option.     

Management options in penetrating rectal injuries.

A retrospective analysis of 54 patients (1976-1989) with penetrating rectal injuries was carried out to evaluate the options in management. The diagnosis was made on proctosigmoidoscopy in 39 patients and at laparotomy in 15. Three patients died within 24 hours from extensive associated trauma (Abdominal Trauma Index [ATI] 39.2). In the remaining 51 patients, rectal wound repair was performed in seven patients, four without proximal colostomy (mean ATI 16.5) and three with colostomy (mean ATI 24.8) without complications. Colostomy and presacral drainage with or without repair were employed in 43 patients. Twenty-one of these patients had rectal washout in addition. The other 22 patients did not have this procedure. The incidence of pelvic abscess in these two groups, who had comparable mean ATI, was identical (4.7% and 4.5%, respectively). One other patient with an extraperitoneal rectal injury had a colostomy alone without presacral drainage and subsequently developed pelvic abscess. The overall incidence of abscess was three of 51 patients or 5.8%. There were no late deaths from sepsis. It is concluded that colostomy (loop or end) and presacral drainage are the most important components of rectal injury management. Small and isolated rectal or rectosigmoid perforations may be repaired primarily without fecal diversion. The value of distal rectal irrigation remains to be proven, but it may be indicated in high-energy injuries of the rectum.     

Management of rectal injuries. Dogma versus practice

The current treatment of civilian rectal injuries stems from military practice. Five principles have evolved: 1) complete fecal diversion, 2) debridement and closure, 3) rectal stump irrigation, 4) presacral drainage, and 5) broad spectrum antibiotics. To assess our practice results, the records of 52 consecutive patients with rectal injury seen at Detroit Receiving Hospital from 1980-88 were reviewed. Etiologies were gunshot (40), shotgun (9), anal assault (2), and stab (1). There were no blunt injuries and no deaths. Treatment consisted of celiotomy (52), diverting colostomy (51), presacral drains (35), rectal stump irrigation (26), and primary closure (1). Broad spectrum antibiotics were administered in all patients. Despite lack of universal application of the "standard" principles, only five patients had postoperative complications and none were related to the rectal injury. Our results demonstrate that a single approach may not be justified, as excellent outcome was achieved with low morbidity and no mortality despite selective management. The universal application of colostomy, repair, irrigation, drainage, and antibiotics cannot be supported.