A 15-item checklist for screening mentally retarded males for the fragile X syndrome

A 15-item checklist, including physical and behavioral features frequently observed in fragile X syndrome, was used in a prospective study of 188 mentally retarded males in order to identify males at risk for this syndrome. Of the 188 males, 19 were found to have the fragile X syndrome, while the remaining 169 males had no recognizable cause of their mental retardation, including normal chromosomes. Significant differences (p less than 0.01) were found between mentally retarded males with and without the fragile X syndrome with increased hyperactivity; shorter attention span; more tactile defensiveness, hand-flapping, perseverative speech, and hyperextensibility; large ears and testes; higher frequency of simian creases or Sydney lines and plantar creases; and more positive family histories of mental retardation in the fragile X syndrome males. Multiple regression and discriminant analyses of the 188 males indicated several physical features were useful predictors for inclusion in the fragile X syndrome group. An overall correct classification rate of 93% was achieved based on 6 variables (plantar crease, simian crease, hyperflexibility, large testes, large ears, and a positive family history of mental retardation) that were entered into the discriminant equation. Therefore, our experience with a 15-item checklist suggests the potential of screening for the fragile X syndrome in mentally retarded males and that 6 of the 15 variables were particularly good predictors of this syndrome.     

Screening of mentally retarded males for macro-orchidism and the fragile X chromosome

Four hundred forty-four male residents of a state mental retardation institution were screened for macro-orchidism. Twenty-six white males (8.3%) and two black males (1.5%) had marked macro-orchidism (>34 ml). Seven of 17 whites tested for the fragile X were positive; the one black tested was negative. Thus, a minimum of 7/26 or 27% (whites) are fragile X positive indicating potential population variability, also evident from previous reports. Concurrent testing of institutionalized brother pairs indicated over half of the fragile X-positive males had a strong family history consistent with X-linked mental retardation.     

Anthropometric comparison of mentally retarded males with and without the fragile X syndrome

An anthropometric survey of 41 variables (weight, height, 10 linear, 4 breadth, 22 craniofacial, 2 skinfold, and testicular volume), including multivariate discriminant analysis, was undertaken on 110 mentally retarded males (39 with and 71 without the fra(X) syndrome). The mean Z scores of the fra(X) syndrome males fell between -2.00 and 8.38 for bizygomatic diameter and testicular volume, respectively, and the range of the mean Z scores of the non-fra(X) males was from -2.64 to 2.26 for hand breadth and testicular volume, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference (P less than .05) between fra(X) and non-fra(X) males for 18 measurements (weight, height, 7 linear, 2 breadth, 5 craniofacial, 1 skinfold, and testicular volume), with the greater measurements (excluding bizygomatic diameter) found in fra(X) males. Sitting height, knee-buttock length, middle finger length, and hand length were negatively correlated (P less than .05) with age, whereas bizygomatic diameter, ear length, and ear width were positively correlated (P less than .05) with age and head circumference, head length, and outer canthal distance were positively correlated (P less than .05) with fra(X) chromosome expression in the fra(X) males. Triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were negatively correlated (P less than .05) with age, whereas ankle breadth, ear length, ear width, and nose length were positively correlated (P less than .05) in the non-fra(X) males. Discriminant analysis of 34 fra(X) and 71 non-fra(X) males resulted in a discriminant function based on 6 of 17 anthropometric variables and age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Fragile X syndrome in mildly mentally retarded children in a Northern Swedish county. A prevalence study

In an extensive etiological study of an unselected series of mildly mentally retarded children (MMR) (IQ 50–70) born 1959–1970 in a northern Swedish county, 5 of 110 boys (4.5%) and none of 61 girls had a fragile site on the distal end of the X-chromosome (Fra Xq 28). Consequently fragile X was seen in 2.9% of the total series of 171 children. In a combined series of severe and mild mental retardation, the incidence of the fragile X syndrome was calculated to be 1:3000 in the county of Vasterbotten. Next to trisomy 21 the fragile X syndrome was the most common single identified cause of MMR in boys. A cytogenetic investigation using special cultural conditions and banding techniques should be performed in cases of mental retardation of unclear etiology and in possible female carriers.     

Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of the fragile X syndrome in a series of 453 mentally retarded subjects: A study of 87 families

We report on a series of 453 mentally retarded subjects investigated for fragile X syndrome from 1982 to July 1995. The 22% rate of efficiency of FRAX positivity indicated a significant preselection by the clinicians. However, this rate dropped to 11% in the last year. Since 1992, Southern blot analysis was extended to include family members of the 87 positive subjects, for a total of 442 individuals examined with the probe StB12.3. In addition to premutated (118), fully mutated (148), and pre/full mutation mosaic subjects (27), 14 atypical cases were found. Some of these cases are described in more detail. In particular, we report on the hybridization and polymerase chain reaction data of 2 fragile X subjects with full mutation and a 2.8-kb allele and 1 with full mutation and a 2.4-kb allele. An intellectually normal male with 18% of fraXq27.3 and an unmethylated full mutation is also described. Finally, a mentally retarded child with only a lower allele of 2.7 kb is presented. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Klinefelter syndrome and two fragile X chromosomes

Two fragile X chromosomes were found in 20% of the cells in a moderately mentally retarded patient with Klinefelter syndrome.     

Simultaneous expression of the rare and common fragile sites on the X chromosome

The fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome is the most common inherited form of X-linked mental retardation and is associated with a rare folate sensitive fragile site on the X chromosome at band Xq27.3. Recently, a common fragile site located at chromosome band Xq27.2 was delineated (Sutherland & Baker 1990). In order to confirm the previous findings and to further investigate the conditions required for induction of both types of fragile sites, we studied the use of four experimental protocols. Samples from a control male, two fra(X) males and a fra(X) carrier female were studied. Both common and rare fragile sites were seen in the samples from the fra(X) subjects. Up to 4% of cells showed both common and rare fragile sites on the same X chromosome at the 500 band level. The rare and common fragile sites on the X chromosome could be clearly distinguished. From 1 to 3% of the control cells exhibited the common fragile site, while none exhibited the rare fragile site. These protocols should be useful in resolving questionable fra(X) syndrome diagnoses.     

Prader-Willi-like phenotype in fragile X syndrome

Henk Meyer¹
A 3-year-old boy was referred to the pediatric department because of unexplained extreme obesity. Height and occipitofrontal circumference were just above the 90th centile. Endocrine studies failed to show any significant abnormality. Motor and speech development were generally delayed. On clinical-cytogenetic-molecular grounds, Prader-Willi syndrome was excluded. Fragile X syndrome was diagnosed by the presence of the classical FMR-1 mutation and confirmed by cytogenetic studies, revealing 20% fragile X positive cells. We compare the clinical features in the present patient with the nine reported patients with fra(X) syndrome and extreme obesity. In pathogenesis, hypothalamic dysregulation is hypothesized. In differential diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome, fragile X has to be considered, especially when laboratory workup for Prader-Willi syndrome is negative. Clinical behavior can be of help.     

FMR1 gene expression in olfactory neuroblasts from two males with fragile X syndrome

The fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) mutation is strongly correlated with specific and marked neurobehavioral and neuroanatomical abnormalities. The protein product, FMRP, is highly expressed in neurons of the normal mammalian brain, and absent or in low levels in leukoctyes from individuals with fragile X (FraX)–associated mental impairment. Inferences which arise from these findings are that FMRP has a critical role in the development and functioning of the brain, and that leukocyte-derived molecular assessments provide a good indicator of FMR1 expression in that organ. This latter conclusion appears true in most cases even though the typical FMR1 mutation is an unstable triplet repeat expansion which demonstrates somatic heterogeneity within and across tissues. Blood to brain correspondence in FraX patients has only rarely been confirmed by the direct study of human brain specimens and, to our knowledge, it has never been studied in living individuals with the FMR1 mutation. In this report, we describe the FMR1 patterns in olfactory neuroblasts (ON) from two living brothers with expansion mutations in their leukocytes who are mentally retarded and autistic. ON were chosen for study because they are accessible neurons closely linked to the brain. In both subjects, the ON genotype was highly, but not perfectly, consistent with that observed in leukocytes. Protein phenotypes across tissues were completely consistent showing the absence of FMRP-immunoreactivity (-ir). These results augment the limited amount of direct evidence which indicates that FMR1 mutation patterns in leukocytes are a good, albeit potentially fallible, reflection of such patterns in the brain. This report further demonstrates the feasibility of using ON samples to evaluate the FMR1 mutation in humans in vivo. Am. J. Med. Genet. 82:25–30, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Prevalence of fragile X syndrome

The much-quoted prevalence figure of 1:1,000 males for fragile X syndrome is an overestimate in a mixed ethnic population. A reexamination of the individuals from whom those data were derived using molecular diagnostic techniques demonstrates a more realistic figure of 1:4,000 males. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Survey of the fragile X syndrome and the fragile X E syndrome in a special education needs population

To begin to understand the population dynamics of the fragile X (FRAXA) mutation and to learn more about the fragile X E (FRAXE) syndrome, we have initiated a survey of children in special needs education programs in the public school system. With respect to the FRAXA syndrome, we found approximately 1/1,000 full mutations among males. No large alleles at the FRAXE locus were observed among 462 individuals. The allele distributions at the two loci among Caucasians and among African Americans were examined as well as the level of heterozygosity. We found a significant difference in the FRAXA allele distribution among the two ethnic groups; the major difference was due to the lack of smaller alleles among the African Americans. No difference was found for the FRAXE allele distribution among the two groups. The level of heterozygosity was less than predicted by the allele distribution at both loci. This is probably due to unidentified large alleles among females with a test result of a single band. Alternatively, this excess may indicate that the population is not at equilibrium. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Reverse mutations in the fragile X syndrome

Three females were identified who have apparent reversal of fragile X premutations. Based on haplotype analysis of nearby markers, they were found to have inherited a fragile X chromosome from their premutation carrier mothers, and yet had normal size FMR1 repeat alleles. The changes in repeat sizes from mother to daughter was 95 to 35 in the first, 145 to 43 in the second, and 82 to 33 in the third. In the first family, mutations of the nearby microsatellites FRAXAC2 and DXS548 were also observed. In the other two, only mutations involving the FMR1 repeats were found. We suggest differing mutational mechanisms such as gene conversion versus DNA replication slippage may underlie such reversions. We estimate that such revertants may occur among 1% or less of premutation carrier offspring. Our results indicate that women identified to be carriers by linkage should be retested by direct DNA analysis. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

不明原因智力低下儿童脆性X综合征的筛查和基因诊断

目的建立一种快速分析脆性X综合征智力低下基因1(Fragile X mental retardation gene 1,FMR-1)突变的方法,对不明原因智力低下儿童进行脆性X综合征的筛查和诊断。方法应用7-deza-dGTP的PCR法一次性扩增FMR-1基因的(CGG)n的重复区,检测CGGn的重复序列的大小判断FMR-1基因状态(正常、突变前、突变后),对脆性X综合征可疑患儿快速筛查。结果在101例不明原因的先天性智力低下惠儿中,我们发现脆性X综合征患儿13例(男性10例,女性3例)。结论采用7-deza-dGTP扩增GC富集区的PCR法可对高危患儿进行快速筛查,确定携带者和患者。     

Frequency of Fra X syndrome among institutionalized mentally retarded males in Poland

Results of cytogenetic studies, performed in a group of 201 institutionalized mentally retarded males, are presented. At least two cytogenetic methods for eliciting the Xq27.3 fragile site, recommended by the Fourth International Workshop on the Fra X Syndrome were used. A subgroup of 67 out of 201 studied males was also examined using molecular methods. In 6 (2.9%) males fra X syndrome was diagnosed. All cytogenetic positive results were confirmed by molecular analysis. Five patients had full expansion CGG repeats and one had both premutation and full mutation. Postulated frequency of fra X syndrome in Polish population being 0.2–0.4/1,000 males seems to be lower than it could be expected on the basis of previous literature data. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Screening for the fragile X syndrome among mentally retarded males by hair root analysis

A noninvasive antibody test was used to identify male fragile X patients in special education schools, on the basis of the lack of FMRP in hair roots. We studied 300 males with mental retardation of unknown cause attending special schools. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the scores according to a fragile X check list (Group 1 /= 10 points). Group 2 consists of 51 males and only 5 males in this group showed no FMRP expression in hair roots within the abnormal range (91%). Fragile X diagnosis in these cases was confirmed by DNA analysis. None of the males scoring more than 10 on the check list was diagnosed positive for the fragile X syndrome using DNA analysis. With our antibody test on hair roots we did not detect a fragile X patient in Group 1. The FMRP antibody test on hair roots is suitable in a screening program for the fragile X syndrome among mentally retarded males attending special education schools.     

Dilemmas in counselling females with the fragile X syndrome

The dilemmas in counselling a mildly retarded female with the fragile X syndrome and her retarded partner are presented. The fragile X syndrome is an X linked mental retardation disorder that affects males and, often less severely, females. Affected females have an increased risk of having affected offspring. The counselling of this couple was complicated by their impaired comprehension which subsequently impaired their thinking on the different options. The woman became pregnant and underwent CVS, which showed an affected male fetus. The pregnancy was terminated. Whether nondirective counselling for this couple was the appropriate method is discussed and the importance of a system oriented approach, through involving relatives, is stressed.     

Detection of the fragile X chromosome and other fragile sites

To assist in cell sample size selection and detect the fragile X chromosome, statistical tables have been presented. A comparable approach had been suggested earlier for the diagnosis of chromosome mosaicism. The cytologic detection of the fragile X or any fragile site is simply a special case in the detection of mosaicism. Minimum numbers of metaphases are recommended for fragile X analysis to have 95% confidence that the fragile X is not manifest in a given proportion of cells and similar recommendations apply to all other fragile sites.