Computer assisted prospective review of blood product utilization: a large hospital experience

In an effort to assess need to administer blood products, we developed a computer-assisted prospective blood utilization review system. Prior to transfusion, clinical information (from the blood requisition form) and pertinent laboratory data (from the laboratory information system) are checked against approved hospital transfusion guidelines (HTG). If request-review is outside HTG, the blood bank physician is called to review and consult with ordering physician. Of 27,840 requests received in a year period (1995-1996), 1.2% (327) were outside HTG and were physician reviewed. The great majority, 120/160 (88%) of requests for red blood cells (RBC) or whole blood were approved; about 65% of these were approved in patients with cardiorespiratory dysfunction and hemoglobin (Hb) > or = 90 g/L. Slightly more than two-thirds, 84/119 (71%) of platelet concentrate requests reviewed were approved; about 69% of them were approved in patients who were either bleeding or were undergoing an invasive procedure and had platelets > or = 20 x 9/L. Almost four-fifths, 38/48 (79%) of fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate requests reviewed were approved; all in bleeding patients with sepsis and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation. Based on the frequent request for RBC transfusions in patients with cardiorespiratory dysfunction and Hb > or = 90 g/L, we have obtained approval to increase the Hb threshold to < 130 g/L as a means of facilitating measures to increase oxygen delivery.     

A simple automatized audit system for following and managing practices of platelet and plasma transfusions in a neonatal intensive care unit

During neonatal intensive care, blood components are often used in clinical situations where both their efficacy and safety lack solid justification. A practical system to continuously analyse actual transfusion practices is a prerequisite for improvements of quality in transfusion therapy. We hypothesized that such a system would reveal inappropriate variations in clinical decision making and offer a means for staff education and quality improvement and assurance. The study consisted of three 120-152-day periods (P I, P II and P III) between January 2000 and October 2001 and involved 543 new patient admissions (141 patients with birth weight < 1501 g) and 6227 days of patient care at a single tertiary level NICU. P I was a control with no intervention, P II was after technically introducing the computer system and, the last period, P III was after presenting and discussing the results of P I and P II at a staff meeting. Upon an order of platelet or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) unit from the blood bank, a computer-based audit system compared the last platelet count or prothrombin time [expressed as percentage of normal clotting activity, prothrombin time (PT-%)] to predefined criteria. In the case of exceeding the preset thresholds, the system required additional information and recorded the pretransfusion laboratory values for later analysis. Thirty-two per cent of platelet transfusions were given with pretransfusion platelet count >49 x 10(9) L(-1), and 60% of these transfusions (19% of all platelet transfusions) could not be clinically justified in retrospective chart review. There was no significant change in this practice from P II to P III. FFP transfusions were given with significantly different pretransfusion PT-% values during P II and P III. The proportions of FFP transfusions with pretransfusion PT-% > 49% were 7.8% and 0.9% during P II and P III, respectively (P < 0.0001). In chart review, none of the FFP transfusions with pretransfusion PT-% > 49% could be justified by clinical grounds. Inappropriate transfusions of both platelets and plasma remain a significant challenge for quality assurance of neonatal intensive care. Automated recording of pretransfusion platelet count and prothrombin time reliably identified the poorly justified transfusions and thus offered a practical resource-saving tool for quality assurance of transfusion in the NICU. A significant shift towards more appropriate use of plasma was demonstrated after implementation of the audit system.     

A prospective audit program to determine blood component transfusion appropriateness at a large university hospital: a 5-year experience

Predetermined transfusion guidelines, pretransfusion approval, and transfusion audits are useful tools in the education of those ordering blood components, potentially resulting in the reduction of inappropriate use of blood components. Our institution requires mandatory prospective audits for a proportion (10%) of packed red blood cell unit orders and all orders for fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. Cases where the blood bank physician recommends against a transfusion and the ordering physician concurs, or when blood components are released against blood bank's recommendation, are referred to the transfusion committee. Transfusion committee members review the medical records to determine the circumstances surrounding the transfusion request as well as patient outcomes relating to their receiving or not receiving the transfusion. We analyzed 220 transfusion episodes brought before the transfusion committee from 2001 to 2005. The most requested blood component denied or changed was fresh frozen plasma. With only a few exceptions, the denial or change of blood components had no adverse effect on the patient. Nonetheless, these interventions were deemed appropriate by the transfusion committee. In most cases, blood components released based on the demand of the ordering physician, despite the advice of the blood bank physician, were deemed as inappropriate transfusions. This study therefore suggests that prospective audits of blood component orders can help reduce inappropriate transfusions and can be a valuable educational tool for the ordering physicians as well as for residents in training.     

Adult outpatient transfusion clinic in a hospital-based blood bank

Eighty-one patients have been followed in our ambulatory transfusion clinic for a total of 176 patient visits. They received phlebotomies, plasmapheresis, and transfusions of erythrocytes and platelets. Minor reactions (febrile reactions, transient hypotension, and urticaria) occurred in only six patients. The advantages of a transfusion service conducted by blood bank professional and technical staff are numerous. The nurse/patient ratio is low enough so that the patient can receive individualized attention including virtually constant vigilance. The laboratory staff and pathologist become familiar with the therapeutic management of patients who may potentially place great stress on the laboratory. The transfusion clinic also provides an opportunity for the pathologist to gain further experience and to train others as transfusion therapists, a role which he is often asked to assume when a transfusion reaction occurs. The gain for the outpatient clinic and emergency room is that they can function more efficiently when more rooms are available for patients who have a faster turnover time.     

Monitoring for underutilization of RBC components and platelets

BACKGROUND: Monitoring blood transfusion for overutilization is standard practice at most institutions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study monitored for underutilization of blood transfusion over a 14-month period, by evaluating patients who had Hb levels that were reported to be <5 g per dL or platelet counts <10 x 10(9) per L and who did not receive an RBC or platelet transfusion within 24 hours of the reported results. RESULTS: During the study period, 24,004 units of RBCs and 3,967 units of apheresis platelets were transfused. There were 148 patients who had a Hb level that was reported to be <5 g per dL or a platelet count reported to be <10 x 10(9) per L and who did not receive a transfusion during the 24 hours after the reporting of these results. In 5 cases, the patients died before the reporting of the low Hb or platelet counts, which precluded the low Hb or low platelet count reports from triggering transfusion therapy. In 8 cases, an underutilization review investigation could not be done, because of the unavailability of patient charts. Of the remaining 135 cases, investigation revealed justifiable reasons for withholding transfusion in 133. In 2 cases, the withholding of transfusion was deemed by peer review to be inappropriate, as the patients should have received a transfusion. Overall, there was one documented underutilization of RBC transfusion therapy during a period when 24,004 units were transfused and one underutilization of platelet transfusion therapy during a period when 3,967 units of apheresis platelets were transfused. CONCLUSION: Monitoring for underutilization of transfusion therapy fulfills the requirements of the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: While the underutilization of transfusion therapy did not appear to be a significant problem at this medical center, determining the reasons for withholding transfusions shed light on important patient care-related issues, including preexisting causes of falsely low platelet counts and Hb levels, delays in investigating critical laboratory values, and the need for policies for the treatment of patients who refuse transfusion for personal or religious reasons.     

An analysis of errors in blood component transfusion records with regard to quality improvement of data acquisition and to the performance of lookback and traceback procedures

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance of blood transfusion covers institutions, personnel, and procedures involved in preparing, issuing, and using blood components. The accuracy of data related to blood component transfusions is a tool for quality control in the transfusion service. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A study of the accuracy of data records of the transfusion service at the University Hospital of Erlangen, Germany, between June 1994 and May 1996 was carried out. All returned blood component transfusion report forms were examined for discrepancies between primary data records and clinical transfusion reports. RESULTS: Blood components (n = 49,224) from allogeneic and autologous donations, packed red cells, fresh-frozen plasma, and platelet components that had been issued for transfusion were included in this evaluation. For 27.3 percent of all components issued, no transfusion report was returned to the blood bank. For the remaining 35,786 units, errors were found in 3.8 percent of the records. For 1.24 percent of all components, discrepant information related to the recipient's identity or the component's status was found; this affected the feasibility of lookback or traceback searches. CONCLUSION: A remarkably high frequency of discrepancies exists between computerized blood bank records and the information recorded on returned blood transfusion forms. The processes of data acquisition and entry must be included in quality assurance efforts in transfusion medicine.     

A novel system for providing compatible blood to patients during surgery: "self-service" electronic blood banking by nursing staff

BACKGROUND: A good blood bank must be able to provide compatible blood units promptly to operating room patients with minimal wastage. A "self- service" by nursing staff blood banking system that is safe, efficient, and well-accepted has been developed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Specific blood units are no longer assigned to surgical patients who have a negative pretransfusion antibody screen, irrespective of the type of surgery. A computer-generated list of the serial numbers of all group-identical blood units currently in the blood bank inventory is provided for each patient. The units themselves are not labeled with a patient's name. The group O list will be provided for group O patients, the group A list for group A patients, and so forth. Should the patient require transfusion during surgery, the operating room nurses go to the refrigerator, remove any group-identical unit, and check the serial number of the unit against the serial numbers on the patient's list. If the serial number is on that list, the blood bank will accept responsibility for compatibility. The system was implemented in 1995. RESULTS: Since implementation, a total of 2154 patients have undergone operations at this hospital. Thirty-two patients received more than 10 units of red cells each. There were no transfusion errors. The crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio was reduced from 1.67 to 1.12. Turnaround time for supplying additional or urgent units to patients in operating room was shortened from 33 to 2.5 minutes. There was no incidence of a blood unit's serial number not being on the list. Work by nurses and technical staff was reduced by nearly 50 percent. CONCLUSION: The "self-service" (by nursing staff) blood banking system described is safe and efficient. It saves staff time and can be easily set up.     

Guidelines for blood utilization review

Hospitals are required by accrediting agencies to perform blood utilization review. Specific areas that must be addressed are the ordering, distribution, handling, dispensing, and administration of blood components. Monitoring the effects of transfusion on patients is also required. The format of the review process and the criteria for appropriate blood utilization must be developed by each institution. This article provides examples of areas that can be reviewed and procedures that may be used. However, the suggested laboratory values must not be interpreted as defining indications or criteria for transfusion. Each transfusion committee, or its equivalent, is responsible for developing its own institutional blood utilization procedures and audit criteria. Review and approval by the medical staff prior to implementation are essential. The procedures must also be reviewed and revised on a regular basis.     

P25Overnight Transfusions Expose Patients to Unnecessary Risk and Seldom Facilitate Next Day Discharge

Aims and Objectives The Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Committee has highlighted the increased risk of overnight transfusion in its annual reports. The risk arises from the paucity of staff (compared to daytime) to monitor patients and manage complications. The darkness on the ward can also obscure early clinical detection of clinical problems. Additionally, patients receiving the transfusion are prevented from sleeping and others in their bay are disturbed throughout the night. The commonest reason offered for overnight transfusion was to enable patient discharge the following day. After seeking approval from the Hospital Transfusion Committee, we performed two ‘snapshot’ studies to investigate the proportion of all transfusions given overnight. Having established that this was a significant number, fifty sequential overnight transfusions were further examined to see whether they were clinically appropriate and whether the recipients were actually discharged the following day. Evidence base/standards. ‘Overnight’ was defined as between 8 pm and 6 am as these are the times between which nursing and medical staffing levels are at their lowest. Transfusions were judged to be appropriate if they were for patients who: ? were actively bleeding ? admitted symptomatically anaemic during the night ? peri‐operative Methodology Each morning the Transfusion Practitioner examined the laboratory copies of the transfusion compatibility reports to identify the overnight transfusions. The medical notes for the transfused patients were then consulted for documented evidence as to the appropriateness of each episode according to the criteria above. Results From the two snapshot studies (each of a month), it transpired that, 43% of units of red cells were given to 40% of the patients and 26% of the units to 42% of the patients. This established that the project would be worthwhile. Of the 50 transfusion episodes, there was documentation in the notes of 30 patients (60%) of the need for transfusion. Seven patients (14%) were noted to be symptomatically anaemic and 3 (6%) bleeding. In total 20% of the overnight transfusions were appropriate by our criteria. Next day discharge occurred in five of the 50 patients. Further work was done to investigate possible delays in commencing the transfusions. Recommendations and actions The main action taken was to educate staff that inappropriate overnight transfusions compromised their patients’ care and rarely allowed earlier discharge. This was done through re‐enforcement at induction lectures, the Blood Transfusion Policy and a sign on the blood fridge.     

Implementing a program to improve compliance with neonatal intensive care unit transfusion guidelines was accompanied by a reduction in transfusion rate: a pre‐post analysis within a multihospital health care system

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that in the year 2006, approximately 35% of the transfusions administered in the Intermountain Healthcare neonatal intensive care units (NICU) were noncompliant with our transfusion guidelines. In January 2009 we instituted an electronic NICU transfusion ordering and monitoring system as part of a new program to improve compliance with transfusion guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the four largest NICUs of Intermountain Healthcare, we performed a pre‐post analysis of compliance with transfusion guidelines and transfusion usage. RESULTS: After beginning the new transfusion compliance program all four NICUs had an increase in compliance from 65% to 90%. Accompanying the improved compliance, all four NICUs had a reduction in transfusions administered. Specifically, compared with 2007 and 2008, there were 984 fewer NICU transfusions given in 2009. This included 554 fewer red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, 174 fewer platelet transfusions, and 256 fewer frozen plasma infusions. We calculate that in 2009, a total of 200 NICU patients who in previous years would have received one or more transfusions instead received none. Applying specific Intermountain Healthcare billing data to the observed transfusion reductions, this new program resulted in an annual decrease of $780,074 in blood bank charges (blood administration charges were not included). During the 3‐year period, January 2007 through December 2009, we detected no change in NICU demographics, major morbidities, length of hospital stay, or mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Implementing a systemwide NICU program to improve compliance with already‐established transfusion guidelines increased compliance from 65% to 90%. Improved compliance with transfusion guidelines was accompanied by a significant reduction in transfusions given, with no increase in NICU length of stay or mortality rate.     

10 Years of Experience with the First Thawed Plasma Bank in Germany

BackgroundPlasma is stored at −30°C, which requires thawing before transfusion, causing a time delay between ordering and issuing of at least 30 min. In case of bleeding emergencies, guidelines strongly recommend a 2:1 transfusion ratio of RBCs and plasma. In addition, each minute delay in issuing of blood products in bleeding emergencies increases the mortality risk. To provide plasma in time in bleeding emergencies, a thawed plasma bank was introduced in 2011.SummaryThe thawed plasma bank of University Medicine Greifswald has provided 18,924 thawed stored plasma units between 2011 and 2020. The workflow in the laboratory as well as in the emergency room, the operating room, and the intensive care unit have been optimized by thawed stored plasma. In case of emergencies, the stress factor for the transfusion medicine laboratory staff has been reduced substantially. The thawed plasma bank allows to transfuse patients with massive transfusion demand at a 2:1 ratio of RBCs and plasma according to guidelines. To reduce storage time, we issue all plasma requests from the thawed plasma bank except for pediatric patients. This results in a median storage time in the thawed plasma bank of 24 h. The “just in time” availability of plasma within the entire hospital based on the thawed plasma bank has reduced precautionary ordering of plasma, and hereby the unnecessary use of plasma. After introduction of the thawed plasma bank, plasma usage decreased substantially by 24% within the first year and by 60% compared to 2019/2020. However, as the overall approach to using blood products has changed over the last 10 years due to the patient blood management initiative, quantification of the effects of the thawed plasma bank in reduction of plasma transfusion is difficult.Key Messages(1) A thawed plasma bank for the routine supply of blood products in a large hospital is feasible in Germany. (2) The thawed plasma bank allows to supply RBCs and plasma in a 2:1 ratio in bleeding emergencies. (3) The beneficial logistical effects of the thawed plasma bank are optimal if all plasma requests are supplied from the thawed plasma bank. This results in a median storage time of 24 h for thawed plasma.     

Current transfusion therapy: indications for basic components.

OBJECTIVE. To review basic blood components and currently acceptable transfusion practices. DATA SOURCES. Professional journals, current texts, and the author's experience. STUDY SELECTION. Not applicable. DATA EXTRACTION. Not applicable. DATA SYNTHESIS. Red blood cells, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and fresh-frozen plasma are the basic blood components ordered daily in hospitals and transfusion services all over the world. To notify the laboratory medical director of inappropriate orders for components, the clinical laboratory scientist must be aware of currently acceptable transfusion practices. This article reviews these four components and indicates acceptable processing methods and appropriate use. CONCLUSION. Considering the known risk factors of blood and blood component transfusions, it is essential that components be used only when necessary. Criteria for appropriate transfusion have changed over the years; old transfusion triggers are no longer acceptable. To provide the best medical care to the patient, the clinical laboratory scientist must stay abreast of currently acceptable transfusion practices.     

Blood transfusion in burns: what do we do?

Over 11 million units of blood are transfused yearly in the United States. Although blood transfusion is common in burns, data are lacking on appropriate transfusion thresholds. The purpose of the study was to identify current burn center physician blood transfusion practices. A 30-question survey of blood transfusion practices was developed and sent to burn center directors. The survey assessed demographics, burn experience, and blood transfusion thresholds. Physicians were asked to list factors affecting their blood transfusion thresholds and then to give their blood transfusion threshold for patients based on age and percent burn. The final section presents three case scenarios with alterations in one physiological parameter to assess the effect on transfusion thresholds. A total of 55 of the 180 surveys (31%) were returned. Mean number of burn beds was 15.7 +/- 1.4, with 264 +/- 25 burn admissions per year. The respondents had been in burn care for 15.9 +/- 1.4 years. Their mean hemoglobin transfusion threshold was 8.12 +/- 1.7 g/dl. The most frequent reasons for transfusion were ongoing blood loss (22%), anemia (20%), hypoxia (13%), and cardiac disease (12%). Inhalation injury influenced the decision to transfuse blood in 34%. The hemoglobin level below which respondents would transfuse blood increased with increasing TBSA burn, history of cardiac disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and age. Blood transfusion thresholds in burns vary based on burn percentage, age, and presence of cardiac disease. To date, no standard of care exists for blood transfusions in burns. Future prospective studies are needed to determine the appropriate use of blood in burns.     

Improvement in transfusion safety using a specially designed transfusion wristband

Fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction due to ABO incompatibility occurs mainly as a result of clerical error. A blood sample drawn from the wrong patient and labelled as another patient's will not be detected by the blood bank unless there is a previous ABO grouping result. We report here the detection of such clerical error by the use of a specially designed transfusion wristband. The wristband has the following special features: (i) once attached, it cannot be removed except by cutting; (ii) it has a pocket containing a transfusion label; (iii) a unique transfusion barcode is printed on each transfusion label and the corresponding wristband simultaneously by computer technology; (iv) a transfusion label removed from the wristband after attachment to the patient has a characteristic tear-mark distinguishing it from one removed prior to attachment. The blood bank only accepted those specimens bearing the tear-marked transfusion labels. All blood units for this patient were labelled with this unique transfusion code together with the patient's details. The nurses counter-checked the transfusion code on the blood units against the transfusion code on the patient's transfusion wristband prior to transfusion. If the blood sample for compatibility testing was drawn from the 'wrong' patient, the intended patient either did not carry a wristband or the transfusion codes did not match at all. Pretransfusion compatibility tests were performed on 2189 patient samples using this procedure. It was well accepted by both ward and blood bank staff. Two potential mismatched transfusions were avoided. These two clerical errors would not have been detected because neither patient had previous ABO grouping results.     

Platelet function testing to assess effectiveness of platelet transfusion therapy.

BACKGROUND: Posttransfusion corrected count increments (CCI) following administration of platelets is the standard method for assessing effectiveness of platelet transfusion therapy. However, improvement in platelet count following transfusion may not necessarily indicate improvement in platelet function or restoration of primary hemostatic capacity. To address this possibility, we investigated the effectiveness of platelet transfusion based on results of the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100) and post-transfusion CCI. INVESTIGATION DESIGN AND METHODS: Platelet transfusion requests with different indications received at the blood bank were evaluated for inclusion in the investigation. Pre-transfusion, the following laboratory tests were performed: (1) PFA-100 assays (blood collected in 3.2% buffered sodium citrate) performed with CEPI and CADP test cartridges; (2) complete blood count (in EDTA) and platelet count; and (3) routine coagulation profile including PT, PTT, fibrinogen and D-Dimer. Only patients with normal coagulation profiles were included. The same set of tests were performed on a new blood sample collected 10-60 min post-transfusion. Chart review and clinical evaluation for response to platelet therapy were performed on each occasion of transfusion. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, five of whom were transfused on more than one occasion were evaluated. Thirty-five transfusion incidents were included. Posttransfusion outcomes were divided into two groups--those that resulted in shortening (>40 s) or normalization of the closure time (Group A) and those that had no change or greater prolongation of the closure time (Group B) when compared to the pre-transfusion value. Seventeen and eighteen transfusion episodes were categorized as Groups A and B, respectively. In Group A with improved PFA testing, nine patients had bleeding as indication for transfusion and six of these had concomitant improvement in their clinical picture as confirmed by control of hemorrhage. In contrast in Group B with no improvement in PFA testing, seven patients had bleeding as indication for transfusion and none showed cessation of hemorrhagic symptoms. These findings were statistically significant (p=0.0114). Similar evaluation using the post-transfusion CCI showed no correlation to bleeding symptoms in these patients (p-=0.500). CONCLUSIONS: In this evaluation, platelet function testing using the PFA-100 provided a better indication of transfusion outcome than did the post-transfusion CCI. Using this approach, PFA-100 may be an effective aid for supporting platelet transfusion decisions and may further aid in improving management of the hospital blood bank platelet inventory.     

Evaluation of pediatric transfusion practice using criteria maps

Pediatric blood transfusion practice in a tertiary-care pediatric hospital was evaluated retrospectively by using the technique of criteria mapping. A total of 630 transfusion episodes involving red cell concentrates, frozen plasma (plasma frozen within 24 hours of collection), platelet concentrates, and albumin were reviewed: 243 (86.2%) were reviewed only by a technical assistant, and 87 (13.8%) required additional physician review. Of these, 138 were red cell concentrate transfusions: 79.7 percent of that group were considered appropriate, 11.6 percent of unknown benefit/risk ratio, 5.8 percent inappropriate, and 2.9 percent impossible to evaluate. Some 246 frozen plasma transfusions were reviewed: 42.3 percent were considered appropriate, 32.5 percent of unknown benefit/risk ratio, 17.5 percent inappropriate, and 7.7 percent impossible to evaluate. A total of 139 platelet concentrate transfusions were reviewed: 64.7 percent were considered appropriate, 16.5 percent of unknown benefit/risk ratio, 10.1 percent inappropriate, and 8.6 percent impossible to evaluate. Some 107 albumin transfusions were reviewed: 90.6 percent were considered appropriate, 1.9 percent inappropriate, and 7.5 percent impossible to evaluate. The criteria maps developed for this study were easy for the technical assistant to use, and areas of appropriate and inappropriate pediatric transfusion practice were clearly identified.     

Transfusion-Induced Bone Marrow Transplant Rejection Due to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens

Traditionally, alloimmunization to transfused blood products has focused exclusively on recipient antibodies recognizing donor alloantigens present on the cell surface. Accordingly, the immunologic sequelae of alloimmunization have been antibody mediated effects (ie, hemolytic transfusion reactions, platelet refractoriness, anti-HLA and anti-HNA effects, etc). However, in addition to the above sequelae, there is also a correlation between the number of antecedent transfusions in humans and the rate of bone marrow transplant (BMT) rejection—under reduced intensity conditioning with HLA-matched or HLA-identical marrow. Bone marrow transplant of this nature is the only existing cure for a series of nonmalignant hematologic diseases (eg, sickle cell disease, thalassemias, etc); however, rejection remains a clinical problem. It has been hypothesized that transfusion induces subsequent BMT rejection through immunization. Studies in animal models have observed the same effect and have demonstrated that transfusion-induced BMT rejection can occur in response to alloimmunization. However, unlike traditional antibody responses, sensitization in this case results in cellular immune effects, involving populations such as T cell or natural killer cells. In this case, rejection occurs in the absence of alloantibodies and would not be detected by existing immune-hematologic methods. We review human and animal studies in light of the hypothesis that, for distinct clinical populations, enhanced rejection of BMT may be an unappreciated adverse consequence of transfusion, which current blood bank methodologies are unable to detect.     

Transfusion management of sickle cell patients during bone marrow transplantation with matched sibling donor

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients have unique transfusion considerations during bone marrow transplantation (BMT), including prophylaxis against stroke and alloimmunization. Characterization of transfusion requirements is important for blood bank and clinician patient management.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) transfusion of SCD patients during myeloablative matched sibling donor (MSD) BMT at one institution from 1993 to 2007 was performed. Patient characteristics (RBC blood group antibodies, ABO-incompatible donor, BMT-related morbidity) and transfusion practices (RBC phenotype matching, transfusion threshold, and blood age) were assessed for effect on total RBC transfusion volumes.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received MSD BMT with 96% survival and 0% rejection. Six alloimmunized patients received RBCs with extended phenotype matching (C, c, E, e, K, Fy^a, Jk^b), 14 nonalloimmunized received limited matching (C, c, E, e, K), and 7 did not have phenotype matching. Among 26 survivors, a median seven RBC transfusions (range, 3-15) and 13.5 PLT transfusions (range, 4-48) per patient were administered, equivalent to 64 mL/kg RBCs (range, 22-122 mL/kg) and 106 mL/kg PLTs (range, 26-343 mL/kg). BMT-related morbidity predicted increased RBC transfusions (p = 0.006). Venoocclusive disease was associated with greater RBC (p = 0.016) and PLT transfusion volumes (p = 0.016). Greater phenotype matching was associated with decreased RBC transfusions (p = 0.0247).
CONCLUSIONS: SCD patients have high transfusion support during MSD BMT. Communication of BMT complications to the blood bank is essential for transfusion inventory management. Phenotype matching decreased RBC transfusions in this cohort and warrants further investigation in SCD transfusion therapy.     

Rh阴性血型患者输血相关问题探讨

Rh血型系统是重要的红细胞血型系统,目前临床输血治疗对于Rh阴性血液的需求仍处于紧张状态.实际临床工作中,通过典型案例分析总结针对Rh阴性血型患者输血的临床经验,建立规范化的血库管理模式,分析Rh阴性血型患者的输血类型,并且积极普及Rh阴性血型的相关知识,尽力减少临床输血过程中导致的输血反应等问题,从而达到安全、合理输血的目的.