Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Shorter survival has been repeatedly reported for patients of African ancestry. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that this gap could be a consequence of socio-economic disparities instead of genetic specificities. However, those results were obtained in a pre-targeted therapies era and the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR are not known in this population.
Objective
In this French West Indies study, we report overall survival (OS) in a frequently mutated population treated for lung adenocarcinoma within an equal-access healthcare system.
Patients and Methods
Clinical, demographic, survival, and treatment data have been retrospectively assessed for all patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma in the islands of Martinique and Guadeloupe between 2013 and 2015.
Results
Two hundred and forty-one patients (82% African-Caribbean) were included. EGFR mutations were detected in 37% of all tumor specimens and were associated with non-smoker status in multivariate analysis. Median OS was 16.2 months. For patients with advanced disease, median OS was 11.5 months, depending on EGFR mutation (23 vs. 8.3 months for non-mutated patients, p = 0.0012). There was no difference in survival according to ethnicity or island. In multivariate analysis, performance status (PS) and EGFR mutation were the only independent prognostic factors.
Conclusions
Despite a higher frequency of EGFR mutations in African-Caribbean patients, ethnicity was not an independent factor of OS in lung adenocarcinoma. Lower initial PS in this mainly non-smoking African-Caribbean population may explain the absence of a difference in OS.
Prognostic significance of early tumor shrinkage following treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has not been fully elucidated.
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of early tumor shrinkage induced by first-line TKIs on overall survival (OS) in mRCC patients.
Patients and Methods
This study retrospectively included 185 consecutive Japanese patients with mRCC treated with either sunitinib or sorafenib for at least 3 months as first-line molecular-targeted therapy between April 2011 and December 2014 at Kobe University Hospital and its affiliated institutions.
Results
Median OS in the 185 patients was 33.6 months. At 12 weeks after the introduction of TKIs, 9 patients had achieved tumor shrinkage from ?100 to ?50 %, 43 from ?49 to ?25 %, 61 from ?24 to 0 %, and the remaining 72 patients showed an increase in tumor size. The median OS stratified according to tumor shrinkage as shown above was 59.2, 39.1, 31.4, and 16.1 months, respectively. Univariate analysis identified prior nephrectomy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk classification, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, liver metastasis, number of metastatic organs, histological subtype, sarcomatoid feature, and early tumor shrinkage as significant predictors of OS. Of these significant factors, only the MSKCC classification, CRP level, liver metastasis, and early tumor shrinkage were shown to be independently associated with OS on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Early tumor shrinkage could be a useful predictor of OS in mRCC patients receiving TKIs as a first-line molecular-targeted agent.
Nintedanib is a triple angiokinase inhibitor approved with docetaxel for adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer after first-line chemotherapy (FLT). In the phase III LUME-Lung 1 study, overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with nintedanib/docetaxel than with placebo/docetaxel in all adenocarcinoma patients and those with time from start of FLT (TSFLT) <9 months.
Objective
This study sought to extend analyses from the LUME-Lung 1 study, specifically for adenocarcinoma patients, to explore the impact of clinically relevant characteristics on outcomes such as time to progression after FLT.
Patients and Methods
Exploratory analyses were conducted of the overall and European LUME-Lung 1 adenocarcinoma population according to age, prior therapy, and tumor dynamics. Analyses also used TSFLT and time from end of FLT (TEFLT).
Results
Treatment with nintedanib/docetaxel significantly improved OS in European patients independently of age or prior therapy. Analyses of several patient subgroups showed improvements in median OS: TSFLT <6 months, 9.5 versus 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.98); chemorefractory to FLT, 9.1 versus 6.9 months (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52–0.99); progressive disease (PD) as best response to FLT, 9.8 versus 6.3 months (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.94); TEFLT ≤6 months, 11.3 versus 8.2 months (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.92); and TEFLT <3 months, 11.0 versus 8.0 months (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.94).
Conclusions
Nintedanib/docetaxel demonstrated significant OS benefits in adenocarcinoma patients, which were more pronounced in patients with shorter TSFLT or TEFLT, or with PD as best response to FLT.
This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00805194.
Cancer cachexia is associated with patient outcomes.
Objective
The objective was to evaluate the effect of cachexia on survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who had received first-line sunitinib treatment.
Patients and Methods
Seventy-one patients were retrospectively evaluated. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using sex-specific cut-offs for skeletal muscle index (measured using pre-treatment computed tomography) that were adjusted for body mass index. The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was measured using C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels (mGPS 2: CRP >1.0 mg/dL and albumin <3.5 g/dL; mGPS 1: CRP >1.0 mg/dL; mGPS 0: CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.
Results
Forty-five patients (63.4 %) had sarcopenia, with 53 (74.6 %), ten (14.1 %), and eight (11.3 %) patients having an mGPS of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly inferior PFS and OS, compared to non-sarcopenic patients (PFS: 7.6 vs. 18.2 months, p?=?0.0004; OS: 22.3 months vs. not reached, p?=?0.0019). Higher mGPS was associated with inferior PFS and OS (mGPS 0, 1, and 2: PFS?=?11.5, 10.9, and 4.12 months, p?<?0.0001; OS?=?47.2, not reached, and 5.28 months, p?<?0.0001; respectively). Sarcopenia was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (p?=?0.0163), and mGPS was an independent predictor of shorter OS (p?=?0.0012).
Conclusion
Sarcopenia and mGPS can predict outcomes among patients with mRCC who are receiving first-line sunitinib treatment.
Cancer therapies that target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway are in ongoing phase I/II clinical trials for several tumor types. However, the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer is unclear.
Objective
We assessed the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer.
Methods
We searched Medline/PubMed for eligible studies of the association between PD-L1 expression and patient survival in breast cancer published before 7 December 2015. The effect size was the hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % CIs were also extracted to evaluate associations between PD-L1 expression and patient clinicopathological features.
Results
We included five studies with 7,802 total patients in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR associated high PD-L1 expression with predictors of poor-prognosis: high tumor grade, negative ER status, negative PR status, positive HER2 status and lymphovascular invasion. High PD-L1 protein expression was associated with shorter OS (HR?=?3.22, 95 % CI: 1.86–5.59; P?<?0.0001), shorter RFS (HR?=?1.38, 95 % CI: 1.03–1.86; P?=?0.03) and shorter MFS (HR?=?3.33, 95 % CI: 2.30–4.82; P?<?0.00001); whereas high PD-L1 mRNA expression was associated with longer OS (HR?=?0.86, 95 % CI: 0.75–1.00; P?=?0.05) and longer RFS (HR?=?0.57, 95 % CI: 0.36–0.91; P?=?0.02).
Limitations
The findings of these studies were significantly heterogeneous; the results should be interpreted cautiously.
Conclusion
In breast cancer, high PD-L1 protein expression appears to be a negative prognostic factor, whereas high PD-L1 mRNA expression appears to be a favorable prognostic factor.
The chemokine (C-X-C Motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) and its ligand, stromal-cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1), are frequently overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors, and are believed to play important roles in the regulation of organ-specific metastasis, tumor growth, invasion, and survival. In this randomized Phase 2 trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of LY2510924 (LY), a peptide antagonist of CXCR4, combined with sunitinib (SUN) in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Patients and Methods
Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to receive LY (20 mg SC daily) + SUN (50 mg PO daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off) or SUN alone. Response was assessed after two cycles; patients continued treatment until tumor progression or intolerable toxicity. The study was powered to detect a 47 % increase in median progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
One hundred eight patients were randomized and treated (LY + SUN, 72; SUN, 36); median duration of treatment of five cycles. Observed median PFS was 8.1 months with LY + SUN and 12.3 months with SUN; Bayesian time-to-event HR 1.23; 95 % credible interval: 0.74, 1.96. LY was well tolerated; the toxicity profile was typical of SUN. No efficacy differences were seen between treatments groups when subsets with high versus low levels of CXCR4 tumor expression were compared.
Conclusions
The addition of LY to SUN in the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC was well tolerated, but did not improve the PFS or overall survival (OS) vs. SUN alone. CXCR4 remains an unproven therapeutic target for the treatment of RCC.
If patients in oncology trials receive subsequent therapy, standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses may inaccurately estimate the overall survival (OS) effect of the investigational product. In this context, a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study was performed with the aim to compare enzalutamide with placebo in terms of OS, adjusting for potential confounding from switching to antineoplastic therapies that are not part of standard metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment pathways in some jurisdictions.
Methods
The PREVAIL study, which included 1717 chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC randomized to treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg/day or placebo, was stopped after a planned interim survival analysis revealed a benefit in favor of enzalutamide. Data from this cutoff point were confounded by switching from both arms and so were evaluated in terms of OS using two switching adjustment methods: the two-stage accelerated failure time model (two-stage method) and inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW).
Results
Following adjustment for switching to nonstandard antineoplastic therapies by 14.8 (129/872 patients) and 21.3% (180/845 patients) of patients initially randomized to enzalutamide and placebo, respectively, the two-stage and IPCW methods both resulted in numerical reductions in the hazard ratio (HR) for OS [HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.81 and HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52–0.75, respectively] for enzalutamide compared to placebo versus the unadjusted ITT analysis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60–0.84). These results suggest a slightly greater effect of enzalutamide on OS than originally reported.
Conclusion
In the PREVAIL study, switching to nonstandard antineoplastic mCRPC therapies resulted in the ITT analysis of primary data underestimating the benefit of enzalutamide on OS.
Sorafenib is recommended for the treatment of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, it is expensive, effective in few patients, and may cause significant adverse effects. Therefore, accurate selection of patients is needed. In a previous study, we constructed a simple scoring system to predict patients’ outcomes based on the occurrence of sorafenib adverse effects.
Objective
The present study aimed to validate this scoring system in a real-life cohort of HCC patients.
Patients and Methods
Clinical records of 279 outpatients treated with sorafenib in eight Italian centers were retrospectively analyzed. Adverse effects considered to calculate the score were skin toxicity, diarrhea, and arterial hypertension, occurring during the first month of therapy. For each adverse effect, 1 point was assigned if present; and 0 points if absent (resulting in a total score between 0 and 3).
Results
Median overall survival (OS) was 10.8 months and median time to progression (TTP) was 5.1 months. At multivariate analysis, performance status, α-fetoprotein (AFP), and Child-Pugh score were independently associated with TTP and OS. A progressive increase of OS and TTP was observed in patients with scores from 0 to 3 (p < 0.001). Six-, 12-, and 24-month survival probabilities were 55.1, 24.5, and 7.9% in score 0 patients, and 100, 80.9, and 46.2% in score 3 patients, respectively. Complete response was observed in one patient (0.4%), partial responses in 41 (15.2%), and stable disease in 117 (43.5%). The disease control rate in patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was 34.3, 51.6, 80.9, and 96.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Complete or partial responses were not observed in score 0 patients.
Conclusions
We have validated a useful scoring system to predict outcomes in sorafenib-treated HCC patients. This score is easy to calculate and suitable for implementation in daily clinical practice.
Olaparib is poorly soluble, requiring advanced drug delivery technologies for adequate bioavailability. Sixteen capsules/day are required for the approved 400 mg twice-daily dose; a tablet formulation was developed to reduce pill burden. This clinical trial evaluated the optimal dose and administration schedule of the tablet formulation.
Patients and Methods
Two stages of sequentially enrolled cohorts: stage 1, pharmacokinetic properties of tablet and capsule formulations were compared in patients with advanced solid tumours; stage 2, tablet dose escalation with expansion cohorts at doses/schedules of interest in patients with solid tumours and BRCAm breast/ovarian cancers.
Results
Olaparib 200 mg tablets displayed similar Cmax,ss, but lower AUCss and Cmin,ss than 400 mg capsules. Following multiple dosing, steady-state exposure with tablets ≥300 mg matched or exceeded that of 400 mg capsules. After dose escalation, while 400 mg twice daily was the tablet maximum tolerated dose based on haematological toxicity, 65 % of patients in the randomized expansion phase eventually required dose reduction to 300 mg. Intermittent tablet administration did not significantly improve tolerability. Tumour shrinkage was similar for 300 and 400 mg tablet and 400 mg capsule cohorts.
Conclusions
The recommended monotherapy dose of olaparib tablet for Phase III trials was 300 mg twice daily, simplifying drug administration from 16 capsules to four tablets per day.
Lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) all eventually develop acquired resistance to the treatment, with half of the patients developing EGFR T790M resistance mutations.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess histological and clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in Hispanic EGFR mutated lung cancer patients after disease progression.
Patients and Methods
EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer patients (n = 34) with acquired resistance to the EGFR-TKI erlotinib were identified from 2011 to 2015. Post-progression tumor specimens were collected for molecular analysis. Post-progression interventions, response to treatment, and survival were assessed and compared among all patients and those with and without T790M mutations.
Results
Mean age was 59.4 ± 13.9 years, 65% were never-smokers, and 53% had a performance status 0–1. All patients received erlotinib as first-line treatment. Identified mutations included: 60% DelE19 (Del746–750) and 40% L858R. First-line erlotinib overall response rate (ORR) was 61.8% and progression free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI: 13.7–19.9). Acquired resistance mutations identified were T790M mutation (47.1%); PI3K mutations (14.7%); EGFR amplification (14.7%); KRAS mutation (5.9%); MET amplification (8.8%); HER2 alterations (5.9%, deletions/insertions in e20); and SCLC transformation (2.9%). Of patients, 79.4% received treatment after progression. ORR for post-erlotinib treatment was 47.1% (CR 2/PR 14) and median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI: 2.2–36.6). Median overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation was 32.9 months (95% CI: 30.4–35.3), and only the use of post-progression therapy affected OS in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.05).
Conclusions
Hispanic patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib continued to be sensitive to other treatments after progression. The proportion of T790M+ patients appears to be similar to that previously reported in Caucasians.
Retrospective studies have found that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) are associated with favorable outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, few prospective studies have evaluated ETS and DpR.
Patients and Methods
We performed a phase II study of FOLFOX plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), chronological tumor shrinkage (evaluated every 8 weeks), and safety. The association of ETS and DpR with survival time was analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
Results
In 54 participants, the RR, median PFS, and OS were 66.7 % (95 % CI, 53.4–77.8 %), 11.1 months, and 33.9 months, respectively. There was no unexpected toxicity. Forty (80 %) of 50 assessable patients had ETS, which was associated with prolonged PFS and OS (11.3 vs. 3.7 months, HR 0.26, p?=?0.0003; 42.8 vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.40, p?=?0.0279, respectively). Median DpR was 56.3 %. The DpR correlated with OS (rs?=?0.314, p?=?0.027) as well as post-progression survival (PPS) (rs?=?0.366, p?=?0.017). Interestingly, DpR was moderately associated with OS and PPS (rs?=?0.587, rs?=?0.570, respectively) in patients harboring tumors with larger target lesions, but was not associated with OS or PPS in patients with smaller target lesions. FOLFOX plus cetuximab was active as a first-line treatment for Japanese mCRC patients, with no unexpected toxicities.
Conclusions
Our prospective evaluation of chronological tumor shrinkage showed that ETS and DpR correlate with outcomes in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who receive cetuximab-based chemotherapy (UMIN000004197).
The combination of everolimus and the imidazoquinoline derivative, BEZ235 (dactolisib), a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, demonstrated synergy in a preclinical model.
Objective
To establish clinical feasibility, a phase Ib dose-escalation trial investigating safety and pharmacokinetics of this combination in patients with advanced tumors was performed.
Patients and Methods
BEZ235 was orally administered daily in escalating doses of 200, 400, and 800 mg along with everolimus at 2.5 mg daily in 28-day cycles. Nineteen patients were enrolled. Adverse events and tumor responses were evaluated using CTCAE v4.0 and RECIST 1.1, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed.
Results
Common toxicities observed included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, mucositis, and elevated liver enzymes. No confirmed responses were observed. BEZ235 pharmacokinetics exhibited dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC0-24 over the three doses, with high inter-individual variability. Non-compartmental and population pharmacokinetic-based simulations indicated significant increases in everolimus Cmax and AUC0-24 on day 28 and decreased clearance to 13.41 L/hr.
Conclusions
The combination of BEZ235 and everolimus demonstrated limited efficacy and tolerance. BEZ235 systemic exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner while oral bioavailability was quite low, which may be related to gastrointestinal-specific toxicity. The changes in steady-state pharmacokinetics of everolimus with BEZ235 highlight potential drug–drug interactions when these two drugs are administered together.
The decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level is faster and greater during cetuximab treatment than bevacizumab treatment and correlates with prolonged survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who receive cetuximab.
Objective
We investigated if the degree of change in the CEA value can serve as a diagnostic tool for predicting survival, as well as tumor regression in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab combined regimen as first-line treatment.
Patients and Methods
Associations among the CEA decrease, depth of response (DpR), and clinical outcomes were evaluated in 113 patients with mCRC from two phase II trials of first-line therapy: the JACCRO CC-05 trial of cetuximab plus FOLFOX and the CC-06 trial of cetuximab plus SOX. Analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A 75% decrease in the CEA was used as the cut-off value to define the CEA response and discriminate CEA responders on the basis of the results of a previous study.
Results
Ninety-two patients were eligible for analyses of both CEA and DpR. The median CEA decrease was 67.4%, and the median time to CEA nadir was 2.8 months, which was similar to the median time to DpR of 3.0 months. The DpR was associated with PFS and OS (rs = 0.56, P < 0.0001; rs = 0.39, P = 0.0090, respectively); moreover, the CEA decrease correlated with PFS (rs = 0.56, P < 0.0001), as well as OS (rs = 0.35, P = 0.019). CEA responders had significantly longer PFS (11.8 vs. 5.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, P = 0.0009) and slightly, but not significantly longer OS (36.2 vs. 23.5 months; HR 0.57; P = 0.072) than CEA non-responders. The CEA decrease was statistically significantly associated with the DpR (rs = 0.44, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates that both DpR and CEA response correlate with clinical outcomes of first-line treatment with cetuximab. The CEA decrease may serve as a surrogate for DpR in patients who receive first-line cetuximab treatment (UMIN000004197, UMIN000007022).
C-met and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) have been associated with the resistance mechanism of EGFR-TKIs. HGF was evaluated as a clinical-marker of response in NSCLC patients treated with afatinib.
Methods
Sixty-six patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma and progression to any-line chemotherapy received afatinib 40 mg/day. Mutational EGFR and HER2 status were assessed by RT-PCR. HER2 amplification was evaluated by FISH. Serum HGF content was measured by ELISA before and 2 months after the start of treatment. HGF levels were assessed with the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free-survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01542437.
Results
Fifty patients (75 %) were EGFR mutation positive. Response was achieved in 59 % of all patients and 78 % of EGFR mutated patients. Median PFS was 10 [95 % CI 6.8-13.1] and 14.5 months [10.9-18.9] for all and EGFR mutated patients, respectively. Median OS was 22.8 [17.5-28.1] and 32.4 months [18.3-46.6] for all and EGFR mutated patients, respectively. Patients with reduced serum HGF levels had improved ORR (75 % vs 44 %; p?=?0.011), PFS (15.1 [2.9-27.3] vs 6.5 months [3.9-9.1]; p?=?0.005) and OS (NR vs 14.5 months [7.8 - 21.3] p?=?0.007). A reduction in serum HGF levels was an independent factor associated with longer PFS (HR 0.40; p?=?0.021) and OS (HR 0.31; p?=?0.006) in all and EGFR mutated patients.
Conclusions
A reduction in serum HGF levels was associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with afatinib. These results suggest HGF might have a role as a mechanism of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. HGF could represent a potential therapeutic target to prevent or reverse resistance particularly in EGFR mutated patients.
To describe the use of regorafenib for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in clinical practice in the Czech Republic, and to describe the clinical outcomes of patients in terms of safety and survival.
Patients and Methods
The data of patients treated with regorafenib were extracted from the national CORECT registry. The CORECT registry is a non-interventional post-marketing database, gathering information about patients with CRC and treated with targeted agents. Twenty oncology centres in the Czech Republic contributed to this registry. Collected data included patients’ characteristics, disease history, cancer treatments, response to treatments and safety.
Results
A total of 148 patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice were analysed. At regorafenib initiation, almost all patients were fully active or slightly restricted in physical activity. Regorafenib was not administered as first-line treatment in any patient. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months and median overall survival was 9.3 months. One-year survival rate was 44.6 %. Four partial responses were observed and 51 stable diseases. Progression was observed in 66 patients (44.6 %). The main reported adverse events were skin toxicity (5.4 %) and fatigue (2.0 %).
Conclusions
Regorafenib is a well-established treatment for pretreated patients with mCRC, however real-life data are scarce. Our results demonstrated slightly better efficacy of regorafenib and better safety profile in patients with mCRC compared to the randomised trials.
Recently, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), standard chemotherapy was flanked by biological agents directed against genomic abnormalities, including EGFR and ALK alterations, that significantly improved patient outcome. Despite these achievements, tumour progression almost always occurs and a reassessment of the tumour genetic profile may contribute to modulating the therapeutic regimen. Resampling may provide tissue for additional tests to detect acquired resistance and/or new genetic alterations, but the currently available information is limited.
Patients and Methods
Histological and genetic reassessments of biopsy or surgical tissue samples from 50 non-squamous NSCLC patients before and after at least one systemic treatment were performed. EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and HER2 mutations were sequenced, p.T790M was identified with real-time PCR, and ALK and MET genomic alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Results
Overall in baseline biopsies, 37/50 (74 %) tumours had genetic alterations, either single (52 %) or multiple (22 %). Among them, 16 were EGFR mutations and 6 ALK rearrangements. In the second tissue sampling, 54 % of cases had additional genomic changes, including newly acquired alterations (81 %) or losses (18 %). The commonest changes were MET amplification and p.T790M mutation. One case had a histological shift from adenocarcinoma to small cell carcinoma.
Conclusions
The remarkable number of molecular changes following systemic therapy and the genetic complexity of some cases underline the value of histological and molecular re-evaluation of lung cancer to tailor the most appropriate therapy during disease progression.
Several clinical trials have reported that therapies targeting programmed death-1 (PD1) and its ligand (PD-L1) improve patient outcomes, while tumor response has been related to PD-L1 expression.
Objective
To investigate the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in patients affected by renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Methods
MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ASCO University were searched for studies investigating the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in RCC. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.
Results
Six studies and 1323 cases were included in the final analysis. PD-L1 was expressed in 24.2 % of clear cell tumors compared to 10.9 % of non-clear cell tumors (p?=?0.002). In the overall population, a higher level of PD-L1 expression increased the risk of death by 81 % (HR; 1.81, 95 % CI 1.31–2.49; p?<?0.001). When the analysis was restricted to cases evaluated by immunohistochemistry alone, the higher expression of PD-L1 more than doubled the risk of death (HR; 2.05, 95 % CI 1.38–3.05; p?<?0.001). In clear cell histology, higher PD-L1 expression increased the risk of death by 53 % (HR; 1.53, 95 % CI 1.27–1.84; p?<?0.001), while in metastatic patients, the evaluation of PD-L1 expression on primary tumors revealed that it retains its prognostic role (HR; 1.45, 95 % CI 1.08–1.93; p?=?0.01).
Limitations
Significant heterogeneity has been identified among the included studies. As a consequence, cautious interpretation of the results is recommended.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis indicates that a higher level of PD-L1 expression is a negative prognostic factor in RCC. Its validation as an independent prognostic factor compared to other traditionally used clinical parameters in localized or advanced disease is recommended.
Little is known about the outcomes, safety, and response to subsequent therapies of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with atezolizumab outside clinical trials.
Objectives
The objectives of the study include to report the clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, and the response to future therapies in clinical practice outside clinical trials.
Patient and Methods
This is a retrospective, single-center study including consecutive patients with confirmed mUC who received at least one dose of atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks between May 2016 and April 2017.
Results
Seventy-nine patients, median age 72 years (range 29–93), 71% men and 76% ECOG PS 0–1, were identified. Most patients (79%) had primary cancer in the bladder, 62% had prior surgery, and 75% received at least one prior line of treatment (34 patients had prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy). Best response included 18% partial response, 29% stable disease, and 53% progressive disease. Patients were on atezolizumab for a median of 2.7 months (95%CI, 1.8–3.6) and median PFS was 3.2 months (95%CI, 1.6–4.8). A total of 33 (42%) patients had significant (any cause) AEs, including grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia in two patients; no toxic deaths were reported. At time of data analysis, only 18% of patients received at least one subsequent line of treatment for a median of 1.8 months (95%CI, 0.0–5.0) while 42% were referred to palliative care/hospice or died.
Conclusions
Patients with mUC who progressed on atezolizumab were unlikely to receive subsequent systemic treatments and the benefit of those treatments appeared limited in our cohort. The findings may impact timing and designs of clinical trials in mUC.
Patients with diabetes are at increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and have a poorer prognosis as compared to non-diabetics when HCC occurs. Diabetics with non-HCC cancers are at higher risk of toxicity related to systemic therapy, but data on HCC are lacking.
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of sorafenib in HCC patients according to the presence/absence of diabetes.
Patients and Methods
From October 2008 to June 2014, 313 patients with HCC treated with sorafenib were enrolled. The patients were staged according to the BCLC system. Treatment response was evaluated according to the mRECIST criteria. The main evaluated outcomes were the overall survival and the safety in the two groups.
Results
Patients were divided in two groups: 80 diabetics (DIAB) and 233 nondiabetics (nDIAB). The median treatment duration was 4 months in DIAB and 3 months in nDIAB. Main adverse events occurred with comparable frequency in both groups, with the exception of rash, that was more frequent among DIAB than in nDIAB: 27.5 % vs 17.6 % (P?=?.047). The median overall survival was 9 months in nDIAB and 10 months in DIAB group (P?=?.535). Median time-to-progression (TTP) was longer the in DIAB than the nDIAB group (P?=?.038).
Conclusions
Sorafenib was as safe as effective in DIAB and in nDIAB patients. The longer TTP observed among DIAB than in nDIAB patients might suggest a better anticancer effect of sorafenib in patients with diabetes.
