A case of encephalitis following COVID-19 vaccine

We describe the first case of encephalitis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Our patient was a 46-year-old Japanese woman who presented with acute onset diplopia. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging revealed brain stem encephalitis that was rapidly responsive to high dosage steroid therapy and completely improved. Although the occurrence of encephalitis after vaccination could have just been a casual temporal association, her symptoms were temporally correlated with two vaccinations. Our case suggests caution and indicates treatment and prognosis, despite no evidence of a causal relationship. Nonetheless, this report emphasizes the enormous benefits of vaccination, which should not be undermined.     

Clinical application of SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection and monoclonal antibody therapies against COVID-19

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical application of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus-2(SARS-CoV-2) specific antibody detection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific monoclonal antibodies(m Abs) in the treatment of coronavirus infectious disease 2019(COVID-19). The dynamic changes of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies during COVID-19 were studied. Immunoglobulin M(Ig M) appeared earlier and lasted for a short time, while immunoglobulin G(Ig G) appeared later and last...     

Medical research during the COVID-19 pandemic

The current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which was first detected in Wuhan, China in December 2019 is caused by the novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus has quickly spread to a large number of countries leading to a great number of deaths. Unfortunately, till today there is no specific treatment or vaccination for SARS-CoV-2. Most of the suggested treatment medications are based on in vitro laboratory investigations, experimental animal models, or previous clinical experience in treating similar viruses such as SARS-CoV-1 or other retroviral infections. The running of any clinical trial during a pandemic is affected at multiple levels. Reasons for this include patient hesitancy or inability to continue investigative treatments due to self-isolation/quarantine, or limited access to public places (including hospitals). Additional barriers relate to health care professionals being committed to other critical tasks or quarantining themselves due to contact with COVID-19 positive patients. The best research approaches are those that adapt to such external unplanned obstacles. Ongoing clinical trials before COVID-19 pandemic have the potential for identifying important therapies in the long-term if they can be completed as planned. However, these clinical trials may require modifications due a pandemic such as this one to ensure the rights, safety, and wellbeing of participants as well as medical staff involved in the conduction of clinical trials. Clinical trials initiated during the pandemic must be time-efficient and flexible due to high contagiousness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the significant number of reported deaths, and time constraints needed to perform high quality clinical trials, enrolling adequate sample sizes. Collaboration between different countries as well as implementation of innovative clinical trial designs are essential to successfully complete such initiatives during the current pandemic. Studies looking at the long term sequalae of COVID-19 are also of importance as recent publications describe multi-organ involvement. Long term follow-up of COVID-19 survivors is thus also important to identify possible physical and mental health sequellae.     

新型冠状病毒肺炎临床表现与影像学特征分析

目的:分析新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的临床表现与影像学征象,提高对该病的认识。方法:回顾分析解放军总医院第五医学中心确诊的58例COVID-19患者的临床资料和胸部影像学表现。根据新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第6版),将所有患者分为轻型(7例)、普通型(34例)、重型(7例)和危重型(10例)并分析影像学表现。结果:COVID-19患者常见临床表现为发热(47例,81.0%)、咳嗽(31例,53.4%)、乏力(10例,17.2%)。实验室检查:白细胞计数正常或减低52例(89.7%),淋巴细胞计数减低14例(24.1%),C-反应蛋白升高18例(31.0%)。CT表现为双下肺分布阴影(46例,90.2%),COVID-19普通型患者CT主要表现为磨玻璃影(23/34,67.6%)或混合型(17/34,50.0%),周边分布为主(28/34,82.4%),重型及危重型患者CT主要表现为实变(13/17,76.5%)及混合型(14/17,82.4%),周边及中心同时受累(14/17,82.4%)。其他常见征象包括胸膜平行征、晕征、血管增粗征、铺路石征、空气支气管征等。5例重型及危重型患者有胸腔积液。结论:COVID-19患者的胸部影像学表现具有一定特征,不仅能做为早期诊断参考,还能对临床病程及严重程度进行评估。     

Changes in diagnostic usefulness of the JRS scoring system in COVID-19 pneumonia by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

IntroductionThe Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) scoring system is a useful tool for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in non-elderly (aged <60 years) patients. As SARS-CoV-2 vaccination progresses, COVID-19 in elderly people has markedly reduced. We investigated changes in diagnostic usefulness of the JRS scoring system in COVID-19 pneumonia between the Delta variant group (vaccination period) and non-Delta variant group (before the vaccination period).MethodsThis study was conducted at five institutions and assessed a total of 1121 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (298 had the Delta variant). During the vaccination period, the Delta variant has spread and replaced the Alfa variant. We evaluated the vaccination period as the Delta variant group.ResultsAmong the six parameters of the JRS scoring system, matching rates of two parameters were higher in the Delta variant group than the non-Delta variant group (pre-vaccination period): age <60 years (77.5% vs 42.2%, P < 0.0001) and no or minor comorbid illness (69.1% vs 57.8%, p = 0.0007). The sensitivity of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was significantly higher in the Delta variant group compared with the non-Delta variant group (80.2% vs 58.3%, p < 0.0001). When the diagnostic sensitivity was analyzed for different ages, the diagnostic sensitivities for the Delta variant and non-Delta variant groups were 92.6% and 95.5% for non-elderly patients and 39.1% and 32.5% for elderly patients, respectively.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that the JRS scoring system is a useful tool for distinguishing between COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia in the COVID-19 vaccination period, but not before the vaccination period.     

SARS-CoV-2 antibody changes in patients receiving COVID-19 convalescent plasma from normal and vaccinated donors

Vaccination has been shown to stimulate remarkably high antibody levels in donors who have recovered from COVID-19. Our objective was to measure patient antibody levels before and after transfusion with COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma (CCP) and compare the antibody levels following transfusion of CCP from vaccinated and nonvaccinated donors. Plasma samples before and after transfusion were obtained from 25 recipients of CCP and COVID-19 antibody levels measured. Factors that effect changes in antibody levels were examined. In the 21 patients who received CCP from nonvaccinated donors, modest increases in antibody levels were observed. Patients who received two units were more likely to seroconvert than those receiving just one unit. The strongest predictor of changes in patient antibody level was the CCP dose, calculated by the unit volume multiplied by the donor antibody level. Using patient plasma volume and donor antibody level, the post-transfusion antibody level could be predicted with reasonable accuracy(R²> 0.90). In contrast, the 4 patients who received CCP from vaccinated donors all had dramatic increases in antibody levels following transfusion of a single unit. In this subset of recipients, antibody levels observed after transfusion of CCP were comparable to those seen in donors who had fully recovered from COVID-19. If available, CCP from vaccinated donors with very high antibody levels should be used. One unit of CCP from vaccinated donors increases patient antibody levels much more than 1 or 2 units of CCP from unvaccinated donors.     

Management of cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic at developing countries

Cancer patient care requires a multi-disciplinary approach and multiple medical and ethical considerations. Clinical care during a pandemic health crisis requires prioritising the use of resources for patients with a greater chance of survival, especially in developing countries. The coronavirus disease 2019 crisis has generated new challenges given that cancer patients are normally not prioritised for admission in critical care units. Nevertheless, the development of new cancer drugs and novel adjuvant/neoadjuvant protocols has dramatically improved the prognosis of cancer patients, resulting in a more complex decision-making when prioritising intensive care in pandemic times. In this context, it is essential to establish an effective and transparent communication between the oncology team, critical care, and emergency units to make the best decisions, considering the principles of justice and charity. Concurrently, cancer treatment protocols must be adapted to prioritise according to oncologic response and prognosis. Communication technologies are powerful tools to optimise cancer care during pandemics, and we must adapt quickly to this new scenario of clinical care and teaching. In this new challenging pandemic scenario, multi-disciplinary work and effective communication between clinics, technology, science, and ethics is the key to optimising clinical care of cancer patients.     

新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2基因检测及其影像学对照

目的研究新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)核酸基因检测及其影像学对照。方法实时荧光RT-PCR方法检测SARS-CoV-2 ORF1a/b和N基因,分析23例SARS-CoV-2核酸阳性患者临床及影像学资料。结果①无症状感染者3例,COVID-19确诊20例,潜伏期2~24天,成人轻型5例,儿童轻型1例,青年轻型1例,成年普通型13例。②23例SARS-CoV-2基因阳性患者,痰标本的病毒含量和检测效果高于鼻咽拭子标本,N基因粪便比痰和鼻咽拭子阳性持续时间长。③20例COVID-19中,30.0%(6/20)CT扫描未见异常。病毒载量与影像学无正比对应关系。④发病部位以外周带(13/14)和下叶后基底段(11/14)多见,两个或多个肺叶受累(11/14),双侧病变(11/14)。⑤14例CT异常COVID-19中,影像学主要表现为毛玻璃影(10/14)、双肺斑片状阴影(10/14)、晕征(8/14)、细网格征(5/14),以及伴发小叶间隔增厚(5/14)、支气管充气征(5/14)和小血管增粗影(5/14)。结论病毒载量与影像学无正比对应关系,SARS-CoV-2核酸检测联合CT扫描、流行病学史可以提高COVID-19的检出率,不能孤立仅仅依靠核酸PCR检查或CT检查。     

Clinical features and potential mechanism of coronavirus disease 2019-associated liver injury

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has posed a serious threat to global public health security. With the increase in the number of confirmed cases globally, the World Health Organization has declared the outbreak of COVID-19 an international public health emergency. Despite atypical pneumonia as the primary symptom, liver dysfunction has also been observed in many clinical cases and is associated with the mortality risk in patients with COVID-19, like severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome. Here we will provide a schematic overview of the clinical characteristics and the possible mechanisms of liver injury caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, which may provide help for optimizing the management of liver injury and reducing mortality in COVID-19 patients.     

Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel,a rapid multiplex PCR method for the diagnosis of COVID-19

IntroductionRapid, simple, and accurate methods are required to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2), a rapid multiplex PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection.MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) that were obtained from patients with COVID-19 who were diagnosed at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine were used in this study. When the NPS samples were found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2 after treatment, they were used as negative samples. We evaluated the performance of the QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Japan-recommended real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method (NIID-RT-PCR).ResultsIn total, 45 NPS samples were analyzed. The proportion of overall agreement between QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and NIID-RT-PCR on 45 samples was 91.0% with a sensitivity of 84.0% (21/25), specificity at 100% (20/20), negative predictive value at 83.3% (20/24), and positive predictive value at 100% (21/21). There were no patients with co-infections with pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2.ConclusionsQIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 showed a high agreement in comparison with the NIID-RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 also provided a rapid and accurate diagnosis for COVID-19, even when the concurrent detection of other respiratory pathogens was desired, and therefore, has the potential to direct appropriate therapy and infection control precautions.     

A SARS-CoV-2 targeted siRNA-nanoparticle therapy for COVID-19

1. Download : Download high-res image (156KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image