Current biomarkers of invasive sporadic pituitary adenomas

Though pituitary adenomas (PA) are considered benign, some of them exhibit invasive behaviors such as recurrence and low rate of total surgical resection. Reliable prognostic biomarkers for invasive PA are highly desired; however they remain to be identified. In this review, we summarize the current controversial findings of biomarkers for invasive sporadic PA, and we discuss the possible reasons for the controversies.     

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein variants in sporadic pituitary adenomas

CONTEXT: Proximal pathogenesis of pituitary tumors remains largely unclear. Recently, three heterozygous germline mutations were reported in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene in Finnish and Italian families with pituitary tumor predisposition and in Finnish patients harboring sporadic pituitary tumors. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine the frequency of the three AIP germline mutations in U.S. patients harboring sporadic pituitary tumors and to correlate clinical features of pituitary tumors with these mutations, if they exist in these patients. DESIGN: Genomic DNA was extracted from lymphoblastoid cell lines established from patients with sporadic pituitary tumors. Three segments of the AIP gene that contain the reported mutation sites for Q14X, IVS3-1G>A, and R304X were amplified by PCR and sequenced. SETTING: The study was conducted in a private nonprofit academic medical center. PATIENTS: The subjects were 66 consecutive patients (including 52 with acromegaly or prolactinoma) participating in a pituitary tumor database who consented to genetic study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The main outcome measure was the prevalence of these specific germline mutations in affected individuals. RESULTS: AIP mutations were not detected in the 66 patients. A synonymous polymorphism was found in a single patient with acromegaly. CONCLUSIONS: The three specific AIP germline mutations do not play an important role in pathogenesis of sporadic pituitary tumors in U.S. patients.     

The treatment of sporadic versus MEN1-related pituitary adenomas

The treatment of pituitary tumours strongly depends on their clinical presentation. In general, the treatment aims are reducing tumour volume and/or decreasing hormone hypersecretion. It relies on single or a combination of three different methods: surgery, medication and radiotherapy. The rationale for deciding the treatment are many but include the aggressiveness of the tumour. The aetiologies of sporadic pituitary adenomas are not fully understood. However, several causes have been identified resulting in specific familial phenotypes like multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN1). MEN1 is related to mutations in the MEN1 gene, a tumour suppressor gene localized on chromosome 11q13 and which encodes menin, a 610 amino acid protein. During the last years, an evidence progressively emerged that MEN1-related adenomas were more aggressive and less responsive to therapy than their sporadic counterparts. In this article, we review the differences between sporadic and MEN1-related adenomas and suggest specific ways of treatment and follow-up for MEN1-related tumours.     

Differential gene expression in pituitary adenomas by oligonucleotide array analysis

OBJECTIVES: Microarray technology allows for the expression profile of many thousands of genes to be quantified at the same time, and has resulted in novel discoveries about the tumour biology of a number of cancers. We sought to do this in pituitary adenomas, the most common intracranial neoplasm. METHODS: Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133A oligonucleotide arrays covering 14 500 well-characterised genes from the human genome were used to study pooled RNA for each of the four major pituitary adenoma subtypes. Individual gene-expression levels in the tumours were compared relative to the expression profile in normal pooled pituitary RNA. Three differentially expressed genes with potential importance in tumourigenesis were chosen for validation by real-time quantitative PCR on the original tumours and on an additional 26 adenomas. RESULTS: Bioinformatic analysis showed that 3906 genes and 351 expressed sequence tags were differentially expressed among all pituitary tumour subtypes. Lysosomal-associated protein transmembrane- 4-beta (LAPTM4B), a novel gene upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, was significantly over-expressed in adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH)-secreting adenomas and non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). Bcl-2-associated athanogene (BAG1), an anti-apoptotic protein found at high levels in a number of human cancers, was significantly over-expressed in growth hormone-secreting and prolactin-secreting adenomas and NFPAs. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p18, in which murine gene deletion has been shown to produce pituitary ACTH cell hyperplasia and adenomas, was significantly under-expressed in ACTH-secreting adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Expression array analysis of pituitary adenomas using the Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133A arrays appears to be a valid method of identifying genes that may be important in tumour pathogenesis.     

Familial pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas are benign intracranial neoplasms that present a major clinical concern because of hormonal overproduction or compression symptoms of adjacent structures. Most arise in a sporadic setting with a small percentage developing as a part of familial syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), Carney complex (CNC), and the recently described familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) and MEN-4. While the genetic alterations responsible for the formation of sporadic adenomas remain largely unknown, considerable advances have been made in defining culprit genes in these familial syndromes. Mutations in MEN1 and PRKAR1A genes are found in the majority of MEN1 and CNC patients, respectively. About 15% of FIPA kindreds present with mutations of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene. Mutations in the CDKN1B gene, encoding p27(Kip)1 were identified in MEN4 cases. Familial tumours appear to differ from their sporadic counterparts not only in genetic basis but also in clinical characteristics. Evidence suggests that, especially in MEN1 and FIPA, they are more aggressive and affect patients at younger age, therefore justifying the importance of early diagnosis. In this review, we summarize the genetic and clinical characteristics of these familial pituitary adenomas.     

Genetic abnormalities in sporadic parathyroid adenomas

We analyzed genomic DNA from 43 sporadic benign parathyroid adenomas for rearrangements of the PTH gene, and for point mutations of the H-ras (codons 12, 13, and 61), N-ras (codons 12, 13, and 61), and K-ras (codons 12 and 13) genes. One of 43 parathyroid adenomas showed a chromosome 11 rearrangement involving both the PTH gene on the short arm of chromosome 11 (at band p15) and a locus on the long arm (11q13). This rearrangement was indistinguishable from one that was previously described in a parathyroid adenoma by Arnold et al., indicating that this may be an important contributor to tumorigenesis in a small subset of patients with parathyroid adenoma. H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras oncogene activation by point mutation at codons 12, 13, or 61, known to occur in many tumors, could not be detected in any parathyroid adenoma.     

Gonadotroph pituitary adenomas

Initially, the distinction between "functional" and "non-functional" adenomas was a purely clinical notion. A "non-secreting" adenoma was not considered to cause acromegaly nor Cushing's syndrome nor amenorrhea-galactorrhea syndrome. The term "chromophobe adenoma" has been used since the advent Herlant tetrachrome. More recently immunocytochemistry methods have demonstrated that most of the "clinically non functional" adenomas (chromophobe with classical histology) are actually gonadotrophin secreting adenomas or gonadotroph adenomas. Due to progress in immunocytochemistry applied to operated adenomas, it is now known that gonadotroph tumors account for 15 to 20% of all pituitary adenomas. Gonadotroph adenomas are monoclonal but their pathogenesis, unlike somatotroph adenomas causing acromegaly and despite numerous molecular studies, remains unknown. Gonadotroph adenomas are most always discovered in patients presenting a pituitary syndrome (half to three-quarters consult for a visual field disorder). Pituitary imaging almost always demonstrates a macroadenoma: two-thirds of the macroadenomas are enclosed. Anterior pituitary insufficiency is much more frequent than gonad hyperstimulation whether testicular (macro-orchidia) or ovarian (ovarian hyperstimulation similar to that observed in ovulation induction). A careful analysis of hormone assay results shows that baseline concentrations of gonadotrophin or their free sub-units is elevated in 30 to 50% of cases (especially FSH in men, and the free a sub-unit in premenopausal women). Dynamic tests contribute little to diagnosis: the GnRH test is positive in 75 to 100% of cases, the TRH test in 60 to 70% for FSH (or alpha) and when there is already a baseline hypersecretion of FSH (or a) in 20 to 30% of the cases for the LH when the baseline LH concentration is high. The immunocytochemistry of gonadotroph adenomas is slightly different from that of other adenomas: generally, only 5 to 10% of the cells, grouped in islets of variable size, dispersed in the tumoral parenchyma, bind anti-FH, anti-LH and/or anti-sub-unit a antisera. Surgery is the primary treatment for gonadotroph adenomas. Complementary radiotherapy may be discussed in case of a postoperative remnant. It is probably effective against recurrence. Medical treatment (dopaminergic agonists, somatostatin analogs, GnRH agonists and antagonists) have given disappointing results.