Is Obesity Associated with Higher Complication Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty for High-Riding Dysplastic Hips?

ObjectiveDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a disabling pathology leading to hip problems, such as painful arthritic hip, unstable hip, etc. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment modality for this condition. Obesity has been shown to be associated with increased rates of complications following orthopaedic surgeries (Journal of Arthroplasty 20:46–50). The hypothesis of this study was that patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 (obese), who undergo total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hip, are associated with longer operative and anaesthetic times, longer hospital stays and higher re-admission rates within 30 days.MethodsAll the cases of total hip arthroplasty in patients with high-riding dysplastic hips were reviewed. Evaluation was made of a total of 68 patients comprising 64 females and 4 males, classified into two groups. Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² formed the non-obese group and patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² the obese group.ResultsThe mean age was 44.67 ± 6.49 years. BMI was < 30 in 44 (64.7%) patients and > 30 in 24 (35.3%) patients. The data analysis showed that mean surgical time, anaesthesia duration and re-admission rate were significantly higher in the group with BMI ≥ 30(obese) as compared to the group with BMI < 30 (non-obese) (p < 0.01). The complication rate was determined to be higher in the obese group (p < 0.05).ConclusionObese patients performed with total hip arthroplasty for high-riding dysplastic hips had more complications and higher rates of re-admission to hospital compared with the non-obese patients.     

Effect of Home‐based Telerehabilitation on the Postoperative Rehabilitation Outcome of Hip Fracture in the Aging Population

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of home‐based telerehabilitation based on the Internet‐based rehabilitation management system on hip function, activities of daily living and somatic integrative ability of elderly postoperative hip fracture patients.MethodsFrom June 2020 to November 2020, we recruited 58 elderly postoperative hip fracture patients and randomly assigned them to the telephone group (n = 29) and the telerehabilitation group (n = 29). Both groups received routine discharge instructions, and the former received telephone follow‐up after discharge, while the latter received remote rehabilitation based on the Internet‐based rehabilitation management system. The Harris hip score (HHS), functional independence measure (FIM), timed up‐and‐go test (TUG), and short physical performance battery (SPPB) were used to evaluate the patients'' hip function, activities of daily living, and overall somatic ability.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the baseline data of the two groups before the intervention (P > 0.05); no matter after hip replacement or internal fixation, the HHS score and FIM score of both groups increased gradually with the postoperative time, and the scores in the telerehabilitation group were higher than those in the telephone group at 1 and 3 months after the intervention, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05); for patients after hip replacement, the TUG and SPPB scores in the telerehabilitation group were better than those in the telephone group at 3 months after the intervention, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe Internet‐based rehabilitation management system applied to postoperative home rehabilitation of elderly hip fracture patients can improve the functional recovery of the hip joint and enhance the ability to perform activities of daily living and somatic integration to a certain extent. This seems to provide an effective option for conducting home rehabilitation.     

Surgical Management for Chronic Destructive Septic Hip Arthritis: Debridement,Antibiotics, and Single‐Stage Replacement is as Effective as Two‐Stage Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo compare the surgical outcomes of debridement, antibiotics, and single‐stage total hip replacement (DASR) vs two‐stage arthroplasty (two‐stage arthroplasty) for chronic destructive septic hip arthritis (SHA).MethodsCases of chronic destructive SHA treated by DASR or two‐stage arthroplasty in our department from January 2008 to October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic information, perioperative inflammation markers, intraoperative blood loss, microbial culture, and metagenomic new generation sequencing results were recorded. The perioperative complications, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, infection recurrence rate, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the last follow‐up were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 28 patients were included in the study, including 11 patients who received DASR and 17 patients who received two‐stage arthroplasty. There was no significant difference in demographic information, preoperative serum inflammatory markers, synovial fluid white blood cell count, or percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes between the two groups. The DASR group demonstrated significantly lower intraoperative blood loss [(368.2 ± 253.3) mL vs (638.2 ± 170.0) mL, p = 0.002], hospital stay [(22.6 ± 8.1) days vs (43.5 ± 13.2) days, p < 0.0001], and hospitalization expenses [(81,269 ± 11,496) RMB vs (137,524 ± 25,516) RMB, p < 0.0001] than the two‐stage arthroplasty group. In the DASR group, one patient had dislocation as a complication. There were no cases with recurrence of infection. In the two‐stage arthroplasty group, there was one case complicated with spacer fracture, one case with spacer dislocation, and one case with deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs. There were no cases with recurrence of infection. There were no significant differences in the readmission rate, complication rate, or HHS at the last follow‐up between the two groups.ConclusionsBoth DASR and two‐stage arthroplasty achieved a satisfactory infection cure rate and functional recovery for chronic destructive SHA, and DASR demonstrated significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs than two‐stage arthroplasty. For appropriately indicated patients, if microbial data are available and a standardized debridement protocol is strictly followed, DASR can be a treatment option.     

Fourth‐Generation Ceramic‐on‐Ceramic THA in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Minimum 10‐Year Follow‐Up

ObjectiveTo report the long‐term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with fourth‐generation ceramic‐on‐ceramic (CoC) bearing in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsWe retrospectively identified 180 primary THAs performed in 110 patients with AS, including 100 (90.9%) men and 10 women (9.1%), from 2009 to 2011.The mean age of the patients at surgery was 33 years (range, 16 to 65 years). Cementless prostheses with fourth‐generation CoC bearings were used in all patients. Survivorship of the implants and postoperative complications were calculated. Functional improvement was assessed by the hip flexion‐extension range of motion (ROM) and Harris hip score (HHS). A special noise assessment questionnaire was performed at the last follow‐up. The cumulative incidence of noise was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Clinical characteristics and functional outcomes were compared in the hips with noise to those without noise.ResultsThe mean follow‐up was 11 years (range, 10 to 12 years), and survivorship of the implants was 99.4% at the most recent follow‐up. The complications included dislocation (one hip, 0.6%), periprosthetic joint infection (one hip, 0.6%), mild to moderate pain (five hips, 2.8%), heterotopic ossification (12 hips, 6.7%), and noise (52 hips, 28.9%). The flexion‐extension ROM improved significantly with a median from 10° (range, 0 ~ 130°) to 100° (30 ~ 130°) after THA (p < 0.001), and the HHS increased significantly from 41 ± 20 to 90 ± 8 (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of noise at 0.5, 5, and 10 years was 6.1% (95% CI, 2.6 ~ 9.6), 16.7% (95% CI, 11.2 ~ 22.1), and 28.9% (95% CI, 22.2 ~ 35.5), respectively, and that of squeaking at 0.5, 5, and 10 years was 4.4% (95% CI, 1.4 ~ 7.4), 13.3% (95% CI, 8.4 ~ 18.3), and 23.9% (95% CI, 17.6 ~ 30.1), respectively. None of the patients with noise generation in the hip reported it affecting daily activities or causing dissatisfaction. No differences in age, sex, BMI, disease duration, bilateral THA, the frequency of bony ankylosis, the proportion of using a 36‐mm‐diameter femoral head, pre/postoperative flexion‐extension ROM, or pre/postoperative HHS were found between hips with noise and those without noise (p > 0.05).ConclusionTHAs with fourth‐generation CoC bearings exhibit excellent long‐term survival and clinical outcomes in patients with AS, with a very low dislocation rate. The incidence of noise associated with CoC bearings in THA performed in patients increases over time, but it does not affect postoperative hip function or daily activities.     

An Initial Experience with Hip Resurfacing Versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Hip resurfacing is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty.

Questions/Purpose

We aimed to compare an experienced hip surgeon’s initial clinical results of hip resurfacing with a new cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

The first 55 consecutive hip resurfacing arthroplasties were compared to 100 consecutive cementless THAs using a cylindrical tapered femoral stem. The learning curve between the two procedures was compared utilizing the incidence of reoperation, complications, Harris Hip Scores (HHS), and implant survivorship.

Results

The reoperation rate was significantly higher (p = 0.019) for hip resurfacing (14.5%) versus THA (4%). The overall complication rate between the two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.398). Preoperative HHS were similar between the two groups (p = 0.2). The final mean HHS was similar in both the resurfacing and THA groups (96 vs. 98.3, respectively, p < 0.65). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with an endpoint of reoperation suggests complications occurred earlier in the resurfacing group versus the THA group (log-rank test, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

In comparison to our initial experience with a cementless THA stem, operative complications occur earlier and more often after hip resurfacing during the learning period. The clinical outcomes in both groups however are similar at 5 year follow-up.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-013-9333-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Analysis of Factors Affecting Early Functional Recovery of Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy

ObjectivesTo explore factors affecting the efficacy of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 44 patients with hip dysplasia who underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy with a modified Smith‐Peterson approach between January 2017 and November 2019. Among them, 40 were women and four were men. The average age was 31.2 ± 9.4. Preoperative and postoperative imaging parameters were measured. The acetabular top tilt angle, lateral central edge angle, acetabular abduction angle, femoral head extrusion index, sphericity index of femoral head, Shenton line, Tonnis grade of osteoarthritis, joint congruency, p/a ratio, acetabular anteversion angle, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale scores, and modified Harris hip score (MHHS) were observed. MHHS were divided into three clinically relevant categories: poor (<70 points), good (70–85 points), and excellent (86–91 points). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, were subjected to univariate logistic regression analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors influencing postoperative MHHS.ResultsThe follow‐up time was 1.0–3.9 years after surgery, with an average of 1.6 years. By the last follow‐up, MHHS increased from 70 points before surgery to 91 points after surgery (P < 0.001), WOMAC pain score decreased from 4 points before surgery to 0 points after surgery (P < 0.001). WOMAC functional score decreased (Preoperative: 18.0 [4.0]; Postoperative: 4.0 [0], P = 0.004). Six patients had sensory disturbance of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, four of which recovered completely during follow‐up. No other complications related to surgical approach, osteotomy, acetabular displacement, acetabular fixation, and postoperative stage were found. There was no significant vascular, nerve, or visceral injuries in any of the patients. On multiple regression analysis, the probability of the postoperative modified Harris hip score of a hip joint with a preoperative lateral center edge angle ≥4.5° being classified as excellent was six times that of angles <4.5° (Exp[β]: 6.249, 95% CI: 1.03–37.85, P = 0.046). Regression analysis of other factors found no significant correlation with postoperative functional scores.ConclusionOverall functional scores post‐PAO significantly improved, and pain symptoms were significantly reduced. Patients with a preoperative lateral center edge angle ≥4.5° had better joint function after surgery.     

Peri-operative Morbidity Associated with Bilateral Hip Arthroplasty for Inflammatory Arthritis: Results from a Consecutive Series of 168 Hips

AimThis study aims to assess the risks and peri-operative morbidity associated with a single-stage sequential bilateral hip arthroplasty (SBHA) when performed in patients with arthritis secondary to inflammatory arthropathy.MethodsData of patients who underwent SBHA between 2012 and 2018 for inflammatory arthritis were extracted from a database, for peri-operative complications and functional improvement. SBHA for other causes was excluded.ResultsData of 84 consecutive patients with a mean age of 34.5 years were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 2.4 years. 66% had ankylosing spondylitis, while 14% had rheumatoid arthritis. 50% of the patients had bilateral fusion of the hips, and 34% had flexion deformity > 30°.None of the patients had peri-operative cardiac or pulmonary complications. 2.4% had per-operative hypotension (MAP < 50 mmHg) and 1.2% had desaturation (SpO₂ < 90%). The mean drop in hematocrit was 9.3%. While 31% did not require blood transfusion, 35% required more than 1 unit of blood. Patients with pre-operative PCV of > 36% had a significantly lower risk of being transfused > 1 unit of blood (p = 0.02). ICU admission was 6%—mostly for post-operative monitoring. While one patient had a local hematoma that needed a wash-out, there were no infections, dislocations, or mortality in these patients. The modified Harris hip score improved from a mean of 26.5–85. The mean hip flexion improved post-operatively from 32° to 92°.ConclusionsSBHA for inflammatory arthritis can be performed with minimum complications in a multidisciplinary setting. Pre-operatively, PCV of > 36 is advised to reduce transfusion rates.     

Arthroscopic Treatment of Acetabular Rim Fracture after Traumatic Posterior Hip Dislocation: A Case Series Study

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical and radiographic short‐term results of arthroscopic treatment for posterior labrum tears with an attached bony fragment after traumatic posterior hip dislocation.MethodsBetween July 2014 and May 2019, a consecutive series of nine patients diagnosed with a posterior labrum tear with an attached bony fragment after traumatic posterior hip dislocation were treated by hip arthroscopic techniques. The patients had been injured in traffic accidents (n = 6) or high falls (n = 3). All patients were provided primary treatment at the emergency department of our institution, and then were transferred to our department for arthroscopy. Demographic data (e.g. gender, age, etc), intraoperative findings, the preoperative and postoperative multiple clinical scores and radiological results were subsequently assessed. Visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and modified Harris hip scores (mHHSs) were measured and compared before surgery, and at the last follow‐up.ResultsA total of nine patients were enrolled, all of them were male, with a mean age at surgery of 32.2 ± 5.6 years (range, 22–65 years). The patients were followed‐up for an average of 26.5 ± 4.1 (range, 24 to 50 years). During the arthroscopic surgery, all patients had labral tears with posterior acetabular rim fracture. All patients had loose osteochondral fragments. Five had partial or complete tears of ligamentum teres. Two patients had osteochondral damage. Two had capsular rupture. Postoperative X‐ray films and three dimension computed tomography (3D‐CT) showed satisfactory reduction of posterior acetabular wall fractures. The mHHS before surgery and at 1 year and 2 years after surgery were 51.8 ± 4.3, 81.8 ± 2.0 and 87.5 ± 1.9 respectively; VAS scores were 5.6 ± 0.5, 1.3 ± 0.3 and 0.7 ± 0.3 respectively. As compared with the condition before surgery, there was a significant improvement in the mHHS and VAS scores at 1 year and 2 years after surgery (P < 0.01). There was no significant improvement in the mHHS and VAS scores between 1 year and 2 years after surgery (P < 0.05). At the final follow‐up, all patients had regained full range of motion (ROM) and were satisfied with the results. None of the patients showed signs of heterotopic ossification, avascular necrosis or progression of osteoarthritis of the hip joint.ConclusionTraumatic dislocation is accompanied by a variety of intra‐articular hip joint pathologies. Managing posterior acetabular rim fracture after traumatic posterior hip dislocation using arthroscopic reduction and fixation with anchors is a safe and minimally invasive option and delays the progression of traumatic osteoarthritis.     

A Comparative Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Open Reduction Using the Anterior and Medial Approaches for the Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

BackgroundThe literature is scanty on reports directly comparing the outcomes of anterior open reduction (AOR) and medial open reduction (MOR) in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).Purpose of the StudyTo compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical treatment using either AOR or MOR in children with DDH aged < 24 months and to evaluate the procedure-inherent risks of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and need for further corrective surgery (FCS).Methods61 children who underwent surgical treatment for DDH were categorized into two groups: AOR (31 hips of 28 patients) and MOR (39 hips of 33 patients). The mean age was 17 ± 5.85 (range 7–24) months in group AOR and 13 ± 5.31 (range 6–24) months in group MOR. The mean follow-up was 118 ± 41.2 (range 24–192) months and 132 ± 36.7 (range 24–209) months in group AOR and MOR. At the final follow-up, mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. FCS was recorded.ResultsRegarding McKay’s clinical criteria, both groups exhibited similar results (p = 0.761). No significant differences were observed between the groups in both the center–edge–angle (p = 0.112) and the Severin score (p = 0.275). The AVN rate was 32% in the AOR group and 20% in the MOR group (p = 0.264). The FCS rate was 22% in the AOR group and 12% in the MOR group (p = 0.464).ConclusionsThis study showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes with AOR and MOR with no significant relation to AVN and FCS.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Comparison of Tri‐Lock Bone Preservation Stem and the Conventional Standard Corail Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the Tri‐Lock Bone Preservation Stem (BPS) and the conventional standard Corail stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsFrom March 2012 to May 2014, we retrospectively reviewed 84 patients (104 hips) who received Tri‐Lock (BPS) and 84 patients (115 hips) who received conventional standard Corail stem in THA. Their mean ages were 53.12 ± 2.32 years and 52.00 ± 2.11 years, respectively. The clinical outcomes were assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS). The radiological outcomes were evaluated by the radiological examination. Accordingly, Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed as well.ResultsThe mean follow‐up time was 48.23 ± 2.91 months in the Tri‐Lock (BPS) group and 49.11 ± 2.11 months in the Corail group, respectively. The bleeding volumes in two groups were comparable (169.22 ± 58.11 mL vs 179.30 ± 59.14 mL, P = 0.003), with more bleeding volume in Corail group patients, while no statistically significance with respect to operation time was observed (65.41 ± 6.24 min vs 63.99 ± 6.33 min, P = 0.567). The rates of intraoperative fracture was 8% for the Corail group while 1% for the Tri‐Lock (BPS) group (8% vs 1%, P = 0.030). At final follow‐up, no statistical differences in regard to HHS, WOMAC, and Pain VAS were revealed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The rate of thigh pain was higher in Corail group than in Tri‐lock (BPS) group (5% vs 0%, P = 0.043). However, incidence of stress shielding in grade 1 was higher in Tri‐Lock (BPS) than in the Corail group (76% vs 23%, P < 0.01), while those in grade 2 and 3 were lower compared to the Corail stem (15% vs 28%, P < 0.01; 9% vs 16%, P = 0.008, respectively). Intriguingly, other assessments in relation to radiographic outcomes and postoperative complications were not comparable between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier survival rate (revision surgery performed for any reason was defined as the end point) was similar between the two groups (P = 0.57), with 98.8% (95% confidence interval, 92.3%–100%) in Tri‐lock (BPS) group and 97.6% (95% confidence interval, 94.6%–100%) in Corail group.ConclusionsThe Tri‐Lock (BPS) has similar clinic performances compared to the Corail stem. Furthermore, the Tri‐lock (BPS) stem has some advantages in achieving lower incidence of thigh pain, stress shielding and intra‐operative fracture. Therefore, we recommend the Tri‐lock (BPS) stem as a good alternative in primary total hip arthroplasty, especially taking into account patient factors, including bone deficiency and convenience of extraction of the stem in hip revision.     

Restoring Rotation Center in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip with the Assistance of Three Dimensional Printing Technology: A Pilot Study

ObjectiveTo develop a new method to restore hip rotation center exactly and rapidly in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the assistance of three dimensional (3D) printing technology and evaluate its clinical and radiological outcomes.MethodsFrom March 2014 to July 2018, a total of 17 patients (five hips of four men and 16 hips of 13 women) with end‐stage osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip who underwent THA were analyzed and followed up retrospectively. The average age is 58.00 ± 8.12 years (range from 45 to 71 years). Simulated operations were performed on 3D printed hip models for preoperative planning. The morphology of Harris fossa and acetabular notches were recognized and restored to locate the acetabular center. The size of bone defect was measured by the bone wax method. The agreement on the size of acetabular cup and bone defect between simulated operations and actual operations were analyzed. Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. The vertical distance and horizontal distance of the rotation center on the pelvis plain radiograph were measured, which were used to assess the efficacy of restoring hip rotation center and acetabular cup migration.ResultsThe mean sizes of bone defect in simulated operations and THA were 4.58 ± 2.47 cm² and 4.55 ± 2.57 cm² respectively. There was no significant difference statistically between the sizes of bone defect in simulated operations and the actual sizes of bone defect in THA (t = 0.03, P = 0.97). The sizes of the acetabular cup of simulated operations on 3D print models showed a high rate of coincidence with the actual sizes in the operations (ICC = 0.93). All 17 patients were available for clinical and radiological follow‐up. The average follow‐up time was 18.35 ± 6.86 months (range, 12–36 months. The average HHS of the patients was improved from (38.33 ± 6.07) preoperatively to the last follow‐up (88.61 ± 3.44) postoperatively. The mean vertical and horizontal distances of hip rotation center on the pelvic radiographs were restored to 15.12 ± 1.25 mm and 32.49 ± 2.83 mm respectively. No case presented dislocation or radiological signs of loosening until last follow‐up.ConclusionsThe application of 3D printing technology facilitates orthopedists to recognize the morphology of Harris fossa and acetabular notches, locate the acetabular center and restore the hip rotation center rapidly and accurately.     

Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome with External Snapping Hip: A Comparison Study of Matched Case Series

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of hip arthroscopy combined with endoscopic iliotibial band (ITB) release in patients with both femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome and external snapping hip (ESH).MethodsRetrospectively review the preoperative and minimum of 2‐year follow‐up data of patients with both FAI syndrome and ESH who underwent endoscopic ITB release during hip arthroscopy (FAI + ESH group) from January 2014 to December 2018. The same number of age‐ and gender‐matched FAI syndrome patients without ESH undergoing hip arthroscopy were enrolled in the control group (FAI group). Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) including international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT‐33), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale for pain (VAS‐pain), and abductive force of affected hip at 3 month and 2 years postoperatively were comparatively analyzed. The VAS‐satisfaction score of two groups at 2 years postoperatively were also analyzed.ResultsThe prevalence of ESH in FAI syndrome patients undergoing hip arthroscopy in our institution was 5.5% (39 of 715 hips), including nine males (10 hips) and 29 females (29 hips). The mean age at the time of surgery was 32.1 ± 6.9 years (range, 22–48 years). According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 patients were enrolled in FAI + ITB group. Twenty‐three age‐ and sex‐matched FAI syndrome patients were enrolled in FAI group. At 24 months postoperatively, no patient still suffered ESH symptoms and painful palpation at lateral region in FAI + ITB group. The iHOT‐33, mHHS, and VAS‐pain score of patients in FAI + ESH group were significantly severer than patients in FAI group preoperatively (41.6 ± 7.5 vs 48.8 ± 7.2, 54.8 ± 7.2 vs 59.2 ± 6.9, 5.5 ± 0.9 vs 4.7 ± 1.0; P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in these scores between the patients in FAI + ESH group and FAI group at 3‐month and 24‐month follow‐up (73.6 ± 8.5 vs 76.1 ± 6.9, 85.3 ± 7.8 vs 84.2 ± 6.6, 0.8 ± 0.9 vs 0.6 ± 0.9; P > 0.05). At 3 months after surgery, the abductive force of operated hip was significantly smaller than that in FAI group (82.4 ± 12.4 N vs 91.9 ± 16.1 N, P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference at 24 months after surgery (101.6 ± 14.9 N vs 106.5 ± 13.7 N, P > 0.05). The VAS‐satisfaction scores of patients in the two groups were at a similarly high level (90.5 ± 6.8 vs 88.8 ± 7.3, P > 0.05). There was no complication and no arthroscopic revision in either group until 2‐year follow‐up.ConclusionAlthough abductive force recovery of the hip was delayed, hip arthroscopy combined with endoscopic ITB release addressed hip snapping in patients with both FAI syndrome and ESH, and could get similar functional improvement, pain relief, recovery speed, as well as patient satisfaction compared with the pure hip arthroscopy in FAI syndrome patients without ESH.     

Low Grip Strength Associated with Clinical Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty ‐ A Prospective Case–Control Study

ObjectiveTo assess whether low grip strength (GS) is associated with clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsA prospective case–control study was designed to assess 231 cases of primary THA between January 1, 2015 to May 1, 2018, at an urban tertiary care hospital. Patients were placed into two cohorts based on preoperative GS levels. Low GS in the present study was defined as GS lower than 26 kg for men and 16 kg for women in the dominant hand. Baseline data were prospectively collected and included patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), the surgeon''s diagnoses, medical history, length of stay, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists'' (ASA) score. Clinical outcomes included surgery‐ and prosthesis‐related variables. The Harris hip score (HHS) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF‐12) were completed at the baseline visit and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively in the outpatient department to assess the hip''s function and quality of life. Differences in baseline data, length of study (LOS), 90‐day postoperative complications, and hospital readmissions were compared. Besides, the correlations between GS and Harris hip score (HHS) and Short Form score (SF‐12) were tested.ResultsA total of 202 participants have completed records for analysis finally. The patients were followed up for an average of 24.8 months postoperatively (24–26 months). Eighty‐two patients (40.6%) had low GS before THA. Patients with low GS were more likely to be female, older, fracture of femoral head or neck as the primary cause, albumin <3.5 g/dL, and have a lower BMI, higher ASA score, increased rates of the pressure sore, blood transfusion, and LOS compared to normal GS (all P < 0.05). Also, patients in the low GS cohort showed a statistically significant increased unplanned hospital readmissions and decreased discharge home compared to normal GS (both P < 0.05). There was an increasing rate of complications between the two cohorts, for cardiac complications, pressure sore after THA, respiratory complications, urinary tract infection, stroke, and DVT (all P < 0.05). A partial correlation test by controlling medical comorbidities and demographic factors was used to determine the correlation between GS and HHS. There was a significant correlation between them (r = −0.673; P = 0.002). A similar condition was detected in the correlation between GS and SF‐12 (r = 0.645; P = 0.001).ConclusionsClinicians should be encouraged to include GS assessment in their evaluation of patients who planned to undergo THA in order to optimize the treatment of high‐risk individuals.     

Early Rehabilitation and Periprosthetic Bone Environment after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo investigate whether the periprosthetic bone environment could be affected by activity during the early rehabilitation period after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of activity during the early rehabilitation period.MethodsThis random clinical trial was conducted from January 2017 to July 2017. A total of 22 selected patients with advanced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) who underwent primary unilateral THA were randomized (1:1) to a high activity level group (HA group) or a low activity level group (LA group). The HA group included nine men and two women, aged 53.18 ± 13.29 years. The LA group included five men and six women, aged 55.73 ± 11.73 years. The intervention was different postoperative daily walking distances guided by researchers: 1727.27 ± 564.08 m 0–2 months and 4272.73 ± 904.53 m 3–6 months postoperation for the HA group and 909.09 ± 583.87 m 0–2 months and 2409.09 ± 1068.13 m 3–6 months postoperation for LA group. The primary outcomes were radiographic evaluation (prosthetic stability and stress shielding based on the Engh scale) and bone mineral density (BMD) with a femoral prosthesis (individual and intergroup comparison using seven Gruen zones) at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were set to confirm the safety and efficacy of activity during early rehabilitation, including day 1 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), day 1 hypersensitive C‐reactive protein (CRP), length of hospital stay (LOS), and the Harris hip score (HHS) at discharge, 2 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively.ResultsPatients were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Regarding primary outcomes, all prostheses were assessed as stable, with bone in‐growth. There were no adverse events in any cases. The HA group had a higher incidence of stress shielding than the LA group, but there was no statistical significance (63.64% vs 18.18%; P > 0.05). The degree of stress shielding had a different distribution for the two groups (P < 0.05). In the HA group and the LA group, the median percentage difference of the BMD on the operated side was −25% and was −13% in Zone 1, −8% and − 1% in Zone 2, +1% and 3% in Zone 3, +6% and + 6% in Zone 4, −2% and +2% in Zone 5, −3% and −1% in Zone 6, and −24% and −12% in Zone 7 compared with the unoperated side. The BMD was significantly reduced in the medial proximal femur (Zone 1) and the lateral proximal femur (Zone 7) in both groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, it was increased in the distal femur (Zone 4) in the HA group (P < 0.05). No difference was found in the BMD when comparing between groups. Regarding secondary outcomes, there was no statistical difference in day 1 ESR and day 1 CPR. The average LOS was similar in the HA and LA groups (7.00 days vs 7.18 days, P > 0.05). The HHS on day of discharge was higher in the HA group than in the LA group (60.73 ± 5.37 points vs 51.18 ± 8.05 points, P < 0.05); however, no statistically significant difference was found in postoperative the HHS at 2 months (81.73 ± 6.92 points vs 78.36 ± 9.18 points, P > 0.05) and 6 months (90.45 ± 5.24 points vs 91.55 ± 4.03 points, P > 0.05).ConclusionHigh activity levels during early rehabilitation after primary THA accelerate the process of bone remodeling and aggravate stress shielding, with no significant benefits for functional recovery.     

Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) are already proven good for end-stage arthritis in the older populations but it is challenging in young teenage patients. The primary aim was to assess Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOSS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and secondary aim for implant survival rate.Materials and MethodsThe details of 33 teenage patients (forty hips) who underwent HRA (21) and THA (19) at our institution (January 2002 to December 2013) with a mean follow-up period of 11.00 years (range 7.00–18.40) were included. The study group had 25 males and eight females.ResultsThe overall median HOOSs with interquartile range were 89.00 (87.63–0.00). The median HOOSs at follow-up were as follows: 95.00 (90.00–95.00) for symptoms, 92.00 (90.00–95.00) pain, 87.00 (85.00–90.00) for functions, 81.00 (75.00–85.00) for sports and 94.00 (88.00–95.00) for QOL. HHS improved significantly from 36.88 ± 6.14 to 90.12 ± 6.56 (p < 0.001). The HHS of HRA group improved from 36.29 ± 5.83 to 89.38 ± 5.23 and THA group improved from 37.26 ± 6.22 to 90.94 ± 7.84. The 5-year radiological follow-up X-rays did not show any radiolucent line wider than 2 mm in all three zones of the acetabulum and no progressive subsidence or migration of > 1 mm and divergent radiopaque line in femur. The Implant survival rate for HRA was 100% at 5 years, 100% at 10 years, 92% at 15 years and THA group was 100% at 5 years and 90% at 10 years.ConclusionOur study showed a disability rate of zero with improved HOSS and HHS. The overall implant survival rate was good with 100% at 5 years, 97% at 10 years and 89.9% at 15 years in contrast to the previous studies with the use of modern implants and newer standard surgical techniques.Level of EvidenceA Level II study http://www.spine.org/Documents/LevelsofEvidenceFinal.pdf.     

Change of Pelvic Sagittal Tilt after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Bilateral Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

ObjectiveTo explore and analyze the change of pelvic sagittal tilt (PST) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with bilateral Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsThe study retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH undergoing THA from January 2008 to June 2019 who were followed up for 12 months postoperatively. Four parameters, including the ratio between the height and width of the obturator foramina(H/W ratio), the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the middle of the sacrococcygeal joint (SSc distance), the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the line connecting bilateral hip centers (SC distance) and the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the line connecting the bilateral lower ends of the sacroiliac joints (SSi distance), which could indirectly reflect the change of PST, were observed and measured by radiographs. The change of each parameter before operation, immediately after operation, and in 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively was compared and analyzed.ResultsCompared with the value before operation, the H/W ratio immediately after operation and in 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively were 0.61 ± 0.12 (t = 0.893, P = 0.377), 0.61 ± 0.11 (t = 1.622, P = 0.112), 0.67 ± 0.10 (t = 5.995, P < 0.001) and 0.76 ± 0.12 (t = −9.313, P < 0.001), respectively, and the SSc, SC and SSi distance in 6 months postoperatively were 30.12 ± 7.06 mm (t = 3.506, P = 0.002), 42.8 ± 7.7 mm (t = 5.843, P < 0.001), 129.3 ± 12.6 mm (t = 5.888, P < 0.001), respectively, and in 12 months postoperatively were 27.24 ± 7.68 mm (t = 6.510, P < 0.001), 36.1 ± 9.1 mm (t = 9.230, P < 0.001), 118.9 ± 14.9 mm (t = 8.940, P < 0.001), respectively. The radiographs obtained in 6 and 12 months postoperatively demonstrated a significantly increased H/W ratio and decreased SSc, SC and SSi distance. At the last follow‐up, the clinical evaluations significantly improved in all patients and there were no revisions.ConclusionThe significant change of pelvic sagittal posterior tilt in patients with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH might be a significant phenomenon after THA, which could occur in 6 months postoperatively.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case‐Control Study

ObjectiveTo determine whether more precise cup positioning can be achieved with robot‐assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) as compared to conventional THA.MethodsIn this study, between July 2019 and May 2021, 93 patients aged 23–75 years with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and adult developmental dysplasia of hip who underwent first hip surgery were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the robotic‐assisted THA group (n = 45) or the conventional THA group (n = 48). After the operation, all patients were given routine rapid rehabilitation guidance. The duration of operation was recorded to estimate the learning curve through cumulative summation analysis. We compared the demographics, duration of operation, cup positioning, leg length discrepancy, hip offset, and Harris Hip Score between robot‐assisted THA and manual THA. Precision in the positioning of the acetabular prosthesis using the MAKO system was also compared between the two groups.ResultsThe mean duration of operation for the robot‐assisted THA group was 91.37 ± 17.34 min (range: 63 to 135 min), which was significantly higher than that for the conventional THA group. When the number of procedures was increased to 13, the duration of operation in the robot‐assisted group decreased significantly and gradually became stable. In terms of duration of operation, robot‐assisted THA was associated with a learning curve of 13 cases. The mean amount of bleeding in the robot‐assisted THA group was not significantly different from that in conventional THA group (328 ± 210 ml vs 315 ± 205 ml) (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference in the proportion of prostheses located within Lewinnek''s safe zone between robot‐assisted THA group and conventional THA group (69.81% vs 64.41%). The leg length discrepancy (LLD) was significantly smaller in the robot‐assisted THA group than in the conventional THA group (p < 0.001), but both were within acceptable limits (10 mm). The inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular prosthesis planned before operations were correlated with the actual measurement (r = 0.857 p < 0.001, r = 0.830, p < 0.001). After surgery, none of the patients experienced hip dislocation, aseptic loosening, or periprosthetic infection during the 3 months of follow‐up.ConclusionThe proportion of acetabular prostheses in the Lewinnek''s safety zone was higher and the extent of LLD was significantly lower in the robot‐assisted THA group, as compared to the same metrics in the conventional THA group. The MAKO robot improved the accuracy of implant placement in THA.     

Arthroscopic Treatment of Labral Tears in Patients with Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Study with Mean 5.8 Years Follow‐Up

ObjectiveTo retrospectively assess the mid‐term clinical and radiological results of hip arthroscopic treatment of labral tears in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH).MethodsFrom January 2010 and December 2019, data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery of the hip for the treatment of intra‐articular abnormalities. Only the Patients who had borderline developmental dysplasia (BDDH) were included. All operations were performed by two senior surgeons, the arthroscopic treatment including labral repair, labral debridement, minimal acetabuloplasty, femoroplasty and capsular closure. The evaluation consisted of pain evaluation (visual analog scale [VAS]), the modified Harris hip score (MHHS), range of motion, the radiological evaluation of plain film and MRI analysis of the hip joint. The plain film evaluation included anteroposterior views of the pelvis to assess lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular inclination (AI), frog‐leg lateral views of the hip to assess α angle.ResultsThere were 34 patients (36 hips) ultimately enrolled in this study. The follow‐up duration of the patients were minimal 2 years (average, 69.2 months) postoperatively. The patient group included seven men and 27 women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 30.9 years. The mean BMI was 22.3 kg/m². From the pre‐operative status to the final follow‐up visit, mean mHHS score increased from 64.5 to 92.7, mean VAS score decreased from 6.8 to 1.3. All scores exhibited statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). The mean LCEA decreased from 22.9° to 22.7°, the mean AI decreased from 7.7° to 7.6°. Which all showed no significant differences compared with the final follow‐up to the pre‐operative status (P > 0.05). However, the mean α angle was significantly decreased from 48.3° to 40.1° (P < 0.001). We encountered no significant complications such as infection, deep venous thrombosis, fluid extravasation, or permanent nerve injury. One patient (2.94%) underwent revision periacetabular osteotomies (PAO) because of subluxation of the hip joint with permanent pain after 6 months failed conservative treatment.ConclusionArthroscopic treatment of labral tears in patients with BDDH may provide safe and durable favorable results at midterm follow‐up. The best outcome could be expected in patients with labral repair and closure of the capsule with strict patient selection criteria.     

Aggressive Presentation and Rapid Progression of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head After COVID-19

BackgroundWe aim to report the consecutive patients diagnosed with osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) following recovery from COVID-19 disease and elucidate the unique features of ONFH associated with COVID-19.MethodsConsecutive 22 patients (39 hips) recovered from COVID-19 and presented with ONFH from November 2020 to October 2021 were included. All the patients received corticosteroids as a supportive treatment during COVID-19. Patients were classified into two types based on the type of presentation, namely classic ONFH and rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC) depending on radiographs, MRI, inflammatory markers and hip aspiration findings. Harris hip score was used to evaluate the functional outcome before and after treatment.ResultsThe mean time to diagnose of ONFH from the onset of hip symptoms was 39.3 days (range 10–90 days). The average duration of onset of hip symptoms after COVID 19 infection was 7.5 months (range 3 – 11 months). The average cumulative dose of methylprednisolone equivalent was 811 mg (range 200–2100 mg) and the average duration of steroid intake was 2.8 weeks. There was significant elevation in the inflammatory markers in RDC group compared to classic ONFH (p < 0.05). The Harris hip score improved from 63.6 ± 23.2 at presentation to 82.6 ± 9.6 after treatment (p < 0.05). Three patients had features of RDC. Among the three patients with RDC, two patients had rapid progression of ONFH and underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). The third patient is awaiting a THA.ConclusionONFH after COVID-19 can have a varied presentation. While the most common presentation is like classical ONFH, some patients can have an acute and aggressive presentation with rapid destruction. They have features like elevated serological markers and extensive periarticular bone and soft tissue edema. A low cumulative dose of steroids in our patients suggests that the COVID-19-associated vasculitis may play a role in the pathogenesis of ONFH.     

Relieved Low Back Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Both Hip Osteoarthritis and Lumbar Degenerative Disease

ObjectiveTo investigate the relief of low back pain after hip arthroplasty in patients with hip joint and spinal degenerative diseases, and to discuss the effects of unilateral and bilateral hip surgery on the relief of low back pain.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we followed 153 patients (69 males and 84 females, age: 43–88 years) who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a posterolateral approach and also suffered from lumbar degenerative diseases in the period of 2009 to 2019. The inclusion criteria were: (i) patients who had been diagnosed with severe hip degenerative disease and also been diagnosed with lumbar degenerative disease; (ii) patients who had undergone THA surgery; and (iii) patients who were retrospectively recruited. The exclusion criteria were: (i) patients who had undergone lumbar fusion or internal fixation surgery; or (ii) patients who had vascular claudication, history of major trauma, diabetic polyneuropathy, lumbar and pelvic infections, tumor diseases; (iii) or patients who had undergone THA because of femoral neck fracture or ankylosing spondylitis. The improvement of hip joint function and the relief of low back pain (LBP) were studied, and the effect of unilateral and bilateral THA on the relief of LBP were discussed. Hip pain and function were evaluated by the Harris Hip Score (HHS), LBP was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and lumbar function was evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system.ResultsThe average follow‐up time was 44.3 months (24–108 months). All patients recovered smoothly without complications. The LBP VAS of 153 patients decreased from 4.13 ± 1.37 preoperatively to 1.90 ± 1.44 postoperatively. The average HHS increased from 45.33 ± 13.23 preoperatively to 86.44 ± 7.59 postoperatively at the latest follow‐up. According to Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system, the proportion of patients with good response to treatment in these 153 patients reached 93.46%. LBP VAS decreased from 4.18 ± 1.38 preoperatively to 1.95 ± 1.49 postoperatively in unilateral group and from 3.94 ± 1.32 preoperatively to 1.73 ± 1.23 postoperatively in bilateral group, respectively. There were only nine patients with persistent or aggravated LBP after operation. Among them, six patients underwent subsequent lumbar surgery (five patients had pain relieved after reoperation and one patient had not) and the other three patients chose conservative treatment for pain.ConclusionTHA can relieve LBP while relieving hip pain and restoring hip function in patients with both hip and lumbar degenerative disease, thus possibly avoiding further spinal surgery.