The coexistence of adenosine A1 and A2 receptors in guinea-pig aorta

The effects of adenosine, 5'-(N-ethyl)carboxamidoadenosine (NECA), 2-chloroadenosine (2-CA), No-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and N6(R-2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (R-PIA) on the tone of phenylephrine-constricted guinea-pig isolated aorta have been examined. For aortic relaxation the analogues exhibited the following rank order of potency: NECA > adenosine > 2-CA > R-PIA > CHA. This is consistent with previous reports that relaxation of this tissue is mediated by the adenosine A₂ receptor. An unexpected finding was that R-PIA, 2-CA and CHA all induced contractions at concentrations lower than were required for relaxation, giving a biphasic dose-response curve. Neither NECA nor adenosine contracted the aorta. This is consistent with activation of vascular A₁ receptors. An A₁-selective concentration of the antagonist l,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl xanthine abolished the contraction elicited by R-PIA in the guinea-pig aorta. This further suggests that the contraction is mediated by a₁ receptors.     

Adenosine receptors mediate both contractile and relaxant effects of adenosine in main pulmonary artery of guinea pigs

In guinea pig main pulmonary artery precontracted with noradrenaline, adenosine exerted an initial phasic contraction followed by a tonic contraction and a slow relaxation. After selective blockade by 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX: 10 nM) of A₁ receptors, adenosine only elicited a rapid relaxation. This initial response was characterized by use of adenosine (AR) and its analogues N⁶-cyclopentyl-adenosine (CPA), R-N⁶-phenyllsopropyladeno-sine (R-PIA), 2-chloroadenosine (CADO), 5-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine(NECA), N⁶-2-(4-aminophenyl) ethyl adenosine (APNEA) and 2-p-((carboxyethyl)phenethylamino)-5-carboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21 680). The order of potency of the adenosine analogues for purine-induced phasic contraction was CPA > R-PIA > NECA = APNEA > AR > CGS 21 680 suggesting the involvement of activation of A₁ type adenosine receptors in the contraction phase. DPCPX antagonized the CPA-induced contraction with a pA₂ = 9.27 ± 0.26, but the Schild plot slope parameter was significantly lower than unity (0.58 ± 0.09). In contrast, in electrically driven guinea pig atrial myocardium (a tissue reported to possess A1 receptors), the DPCPX-CPA antagonism was purely competitive (pA₂ = 8.95 ± 0.06; slope = 0.93 ± 0.06). In the presence of 300 nM DPCPX, the rank order of potency for the purine-induced fast relaxation was NECA > CADO = AR > CGS 21 680 = R-PIA > CPA. The NECA- and adenosine-induced relaxation was influenced neither by 300 nM CP 66 713 (an antagonist at A_2a receptors), nor by endothelial removal and inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (100 M N^G-nitro-L-arginine: L-NOARG). The adenosine-induced relaxation was antagonized by 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT), a potent A₁/A₂ antagonist. However, the rapid relaxation elicited by adenosine in the presence of 8-PT, was reversed and contraction developed. It is concluded that adenosine causes contraction via dual action on A₁ adenosine receptors and on xanthine-resistant sites. Our experiments with APNEA (a prototypic A₃ receptor agonist) did not support the suggestion that A₃ receptors are implicated in the xanthine-resistant component of adenosine-induced contraction, as DPCPX (300 nM) completely abolished and even reversed the APNEA-induced contraction. In addition, cromolyn (a mast cell stabilizing agent) did not influence the xanthine-resistant contraction induced by adenosine in the presence of DPCPX, 8-PT and dipyridamole (an adenosine uptake inhibitor). On the basis of the rank order of agonist potency, the receptors involved in the adenosine-induced rapid relaxation most likely is of the A_2b subtype. The opposing action of the xanthine-resistant contraction, however, did not allow a definitive pharmacological characterization of the receptor mediating relaxation.     

Influences of different adenosine receptor subtypes on catalepsy in mice

The effects of adenosine A₁ and A₂ receptors on catalepsy were studied in mice. The adenosine agonists 5-N-ethylcarboxamide-adenosine (NECA), N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine (PIA) and N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) induced dose dependent catalepsy. The A₁ adenosine antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT) potentiated catalepsy induced by NECA, R-PIA and CHA. However, theophylline did not potentiate but inhibited the responses induced by NECA, R-PIA and CHA. Neither 8-PT nor theophylline alone has any effect on catalepsy in mice. It is concluded that catalepsy induced by the adenosine agonists may be due to A₂ receptor stimulation and that the A₁ antagonism may potentiate the response.     

Species-dependent effects of adenosine receptor agonists on contractile responses of vas deferens to ATP

1 Experiments were carried out to examine the postjunctional actions of adenosine receptor agonists on the smooth muscle of the vas deferens of the guinea-pig and rabbit. 2 Although they produced neither contraction nor relaxation by themselves, adenosine analogues enhanced contractions of the guinea-pig vas deferens induced by 10 μm ATP. The rank order of potency was N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) > 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) > adenosine > CGS 21680. Dose–response curves for NECA were shifted to the right by the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist 8(p-sulphophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT; 100 μm ) and by the selective A₁-receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX; 1 m m ). 3 In the rabbit vas deferens, contractions induced by ATP (1 m m ) were inhibited rather than facilitated by NECA. Neither CPA, R(–)-N⁶-(2-phenyl isopropyl)-adenosine (R-PIA) nor CGS 21680 had any effect. 4 The results indicate that the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig vas deferens expresses facilitatory adenosine A₁ receptors but not adenosine A₂ receptors. In contrast, in rabbit there are postjunctional inhibitory adenosine A_2A receptors but not adenosine A₁ receptors.     

Inotropic actions of adenosine derivatives in the mammalian heart

The effects of adenosine receptor (AR) stimulation on contractile parameters as well as inositol phosphates, cAMP content, and phospholamban-phosphorylation was studied in cardiac preparations. In guinea-pig papillary muscles adenosine increased inositol trisphosphate formation and also slightly elevated force of contraction. In the presence of isoprenaline, however, adenosine still enhanced inositol trisphosphate formation but reduced force of contraction. In isolated electrically driven guinea-pig ventricular cardiomyocytes the A₁-AR agonist R-PIA and the A₁/A₂-AR agonist NECA reduced isoprenaline-stimulated contractility but only R-PIA decreased isoprenaline-enhanced cAMP content. The selective A₂-AR agonist CGS 21680 increased isoprenaline-stimulated cAMP content. This effect of CGS 21680 was antagonized by the A₂-AR antagonist CGS 15943A and was increased after pertussis toxin-pretreatment. Furthermore, R-PIA and NECA decreased via A₁-ARs the isoprenaline-stimulated phospholamban-phosphorylation in guinea-pig ventricular cardiomyocytes. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Activation of adenosine1 (A1) receptors suppresses head shakes induced by a serotonergic hallucinogen in rats

Modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by metabotropic glutamate2/3 (mGlu2/3) receptor agonists effectively treats seemingly diverse neuropsychiatric illness such as generalized anxiety disorder and schizophrenia. Activation of adenosine A₁ heteroceptors, like mGlu2 autoreceptors, decreases glutamate release in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and other limbic brain regions. Previously, we have reported electrophysiological, neurochemical and behavioral evidence for interactions between the 5-hydroxytryptamine_2A (5-HT_2A) and mGlu2/3 receptors in the mPFC. The present studies were designed to investigate the effects in rats of adenosine A₁ receptor activation/blockade on a behavior modulated by 5-HT_2A receptor activation/blockade in the mPFC: head shakes induced in the rat by phenethylamine hallucinogens. An adenosine A₁ receptor agonist, N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) suppressed head shakes induced by activation of 5-HT_2A receptors with the phenethylamine hallucinogen (±)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine hydrochloride (DOI). An adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), enhanced DOI-induced head shakes and blocked the suppressant action of an adenosine A₁ receptor agonist on DOI-induced head shakes. Thus, the pattern of activity for an agonist and antagonist at the adenosine A1 receptor with respect to modulating DOI-induced head shakes is similar to the pattern observed with mGlu2/3 receptor agonists and antagonists. These novel observations with an adenosine A₁ receptor agonist suggest that this pharmacological action could contribute to antipsychotic effects in addition to thymoleptic effects.     

Comparison of the behavioral effects of adenosine agonists and dopamine antagonists in mice

The adenosine agonists 5-N-ethylcarboxamidea-denosine (NECA), 2-chloroadenosine (2-CLA), N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 2-(phenylamino)adenosine (CV-1808) and R and S isomers of N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA and S-PIA) decreased spontaneous locomotor activity in mice and, except for CPA, did so at doses that did not impair motor coordination, a profile shared by dopamine antagonists. CV-1808, the only agent with higher affinity for A₂ as compared with A₁ adenosine receptors, displayed the largest separation between locomotor inhibitory and ataxic potency. Like dopamine antagonists, NECA and CV-1808 also decreased hyperactivity caused by d-amphetamine at doses that did not cause ataxia whereas A₁-selective adenosine agonists reduced amphetamine's effects only at ataxic doses. Unlike dopamine antagonists, adenosine agonists inhibited apomorphine-induced cage climbing only at doses that caused ataxia. Involvement of central adenosine receptors in these effects was suggested by the significant correlation obtained between potency for locomotor inhibition after IP and ICV administration. Affinity for A₁ but not A₂ adenosine receptors was significantly correlated with potency for inducing ataxia. These results suggest that the behavioral profile of adenosine agonists in mice is related to their affinity for A₁ and A₂ adenosine receptors and indicate that adenosine agonists produce certain behavioral effects that are similar to those seen with dopamine antagonists.     

Differential regulation of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in serotonin transporter and monoamine oxidase A-deficient mice

The serotonin (5HT) transporter (5HTT) removes 5HT from the synaptic cleft and is thus critical to the control of serotonergic neurotransmission. Mice with a targeted inactivation of the 5HTT represent a novel and unique tool to study serotonergic system functioning. Because the release of 5HT is regulated by adenosine, we investigated 5HTT-deficient mice for possible adaptive changes of adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors. A₁ and A_2A receptors were studied by means of quantitative autoradiography using the radioligands [³H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine and [³H]CGS 21680, respectively. A comparison of 5HTT knockout versus control mice revealed upregulation of A₁ receptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN, +21%), but not in any of the serotonergic projection areas, and downregulation of A_2A receptors in basal ganglia. The adaptive changes of A₁ and A_2A receptors in 5HTT-deficient mice are likely to represent a compensatory neuroprotective effect mediated by the adenosinergic modulatory system. For comparison, these receptors were also studied in monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) knockout mice and in 5HTT/MAOA double knockout mice. 5HTT/MAOA double knockout mice showed adaptive changes of adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors similar to 5HTT knockout mice, while investigation of MAOA-deficient mice revealed an upregulation of A_2A receptors, which may relate to a role of both MAOA and adenosine A_2A receptors in anxiety.     

Do adenosine A3 receptors exist?

1. It has been suggested that adenosine A1 receptors may be sub-divided into A1 and A3 types, based on the relative potencies of 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) and selected N6-substituted adenosine analogues. At A1 receptors (rat adipocytes) N6-phenylisopropyladenosine (PIA) was reported to be approx. 100-fold more potent than NECA, whereas the compounds were equipotent at A3 receptors (those in cardiac and neuronal preparations). 2. The study reported here has systematically evaluated this proposal, the rank orders of potency of NECA, R- and S-PIA, N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) being determined in rat adipocytes, guinea-pig ileum and rat and guinea-pig atria. 3. R-PIA, CHA and CPA were found to have consistent potencies relative to NECA across all 6 tissues, including rat adipocytes. The rank order was CPA greater than or equal to CHA, R-PIA greater than or equal to NECA greater than S-PIA. 4. We conclude that the relative potencies of these agonists do not support the concept that adenosine A1 receptors in rat adipocytes differ from those in neuronal and cardiac tissues.     

A1-and A2-PURINOCEPTORS IN THE GUINEA-PIG UTERUS

1. Radioligand binding and functional studies were undertaken to investigate the P₁-purinoceptors present in the separated myometrial layers and the endometrium of the guinea-pig uterus. 2. In preparations of endometrium-denuded circular myometrium, the A₂-selective agonists (2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine (CGS 21680, 100 μmol/L) and N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (NECA, 1–10 μmol/L) inhibited contractile responses to phenylephrine. In preparations of endometrium-intact circular myometrium, NECA (10 μmol/L) enhanced responses to phenylephrine. NECA did not modulate the spontaneous contractions of longitudinal myometrium. 3. Homogenate binding studies with circular myometrium, longitudinal myometrium and endometrium revealed saturable high affinity [³H]-NECA binding sites. The mean maximal densities of binding sites (B_max) were 2.08, 14.7 and 15.5 fmol/mg protein, and pK_D (neg. log dissociation constant) values were 9.82, 9.19 and 7.44, respectively. 4. (R-) and (S-) -N⁶-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R- and S-PIA) both competed for two [³H]-NECA binding sites in preparations of circular myometrium. CGS 21680 competed for two [³H]-NECA binding sites in preparations of endometrium and longitudinal myometrium. All other agonist competition was for one site only. The rank orders of potency of high affinity binding were S-PIA ≥ R-PIA ≥ CGS 21680 (circular myometrium), R-PIA ≥ CGS 21680 ≥ S-PIA (longitudinal myometrium) and CGS 21680 > > S-PIA ≥ R-PIA (endometrium). 5. In preparations of circular myometrium, longitudinal myometrium and endometrium the selective A₁-purinoceptor antagonist, 1,3-dipropyl-8-(2-amino-4-chloro)-phenylxanthine (PACPX), competed for two [³H]-NECA binding sites, the non-selective antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX), competed for one site only. 6. NECA increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (CAMP) levels in preparations of both circular myometrium and endometrium. 7. These results indicate that P₁-purinoceptors of the A₂-subtype mediate the inhibitory effects of adenosine analogues on the phenylephrine-induced contractions of the circular myometrium of the guinea-pig, this effect is modified by the presence of the endometrium. There is no evidence that the [³H]-NECA binding sites of the longitudinal myometrium correlate with functional P₁-purinoceptors in this tissue.     

Effect of selective agonists and antagonists on atrial adenosine receptors and their interaction with Bay K 8644 and [3H]-nitrendipine.

1. (-)-N6-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) and N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), highly selective agonists at A1-adenosine receptors, 5'-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine (NECA), a non-selective agonist at A1 and A2 receptors, and 2-phenylaminoadenosine (CV-1808), a selective A2 agonist, were compared in spontaneously beating and electrically driven atria. R-PIA, CHA and NECA inhibited contraction in both preparations. CV-1808 was not effective up to 500 nM. 2. 1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), a new selective A1 receptor antagonist, competitively inhibited the effects of the adenosine agonists, at low concentrations (IC50 less than 1 nM). 3. CHA and NECA were able to inhibit the positive inotropic effect of Bay K 8644 both in spontaneously beating and in electrically driven atria. 4. R-PIA, CHA and NECA (agonists), 8-phenyltheophylline (PT) and DPCPX (antagonists), failed to influence [3H]-nitrendipine binding on microsomal membranes from guinea-pig atria and ventricles in a range of concentrations from 1 nM to 100 microM. 5. The data support the existence of A1 receptors in atrial tissue. No evidence for a direct interaction between adenosine analogues and Bay K 8644 was found at the level of slow calcium channels. Adenosine analogues appear to antagonize the effects of Bay K 8644 indirectly by activation of A1 receptors.     

Effects of adenosine A2 receptor agonists on the excitation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent sensory nerves in airway tissues

We examined the effects of adenosine analogues on the asthmatic reactions induced by the stimulation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent sensory nerves. Intravenous (i.v.) injection of adenosine A₂ receptor agonists, 5′-(N-ethylcarboxamido)-adenosine (NECA) and 2-[p-(carboxyethyl)-phenylethylamino]-5′-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine (CGS 21680), dose dependently inhibited capsaicin-induced guinea-pig bronchoconstriction (1–1000 nmol kg⁻¹), whereas i.v. administration of the adenosine A₁ receptor agonist, N⁶-cyclo-hexyladenosine (CHA), did not affect it (1000 nmol kg⁻¹). Intratracheal injection of NECA (0.05–5 nmol site⁻¹) and CGA 21 680 (0.05−5 nmol site⁻¹) also reduced capsaicin-induced constriction in a dose-dependent manner. However, NECA (1000 nmol kg⁻¹) failed to inhibit substance P-induced guinea-pig bronchoconstriction. NECA (1–1000 nmol kg⁻¹) dose-dependently inhibited cigarette smoke-induced rat tracheal plasma extravasation, but not substance P-induced reaction. NECA (0.1–10 μM) and CGS 21 680 (10 μM) significantly blocked the capsaicin-induced release of substance P-like immunoreactivity from guinea-pig lung, whereas CHA (10 μM) had no effect. This evidence suggests that adenosine A₂ receptors modulate negatively the excitation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent sensory nerves and substance P release from their endings in airway tissues.     

Adenosine receptor-mediated contraction and relaxation of guinea-pig isolated tracheal smooth muscle: effects of adenosine antagonists.

1. The effects of several adenosine analogues and antagonists on guinea-pig isolated trachea have been examined. 2. 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), 5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (MECA) and adenosine (in the presence and absence of dipyridamole) elicited concentration-dependent tracheal relaxation. 3. The R(-)- and S(+)-enantiomers of N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA and S-PIA respectively), N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) and 2-chloroadenosine (CADO) caused contractions at low concentrations (0.05-2.0 microM), whereas at higher concentrations, relaxation resulted. 4. For tracheal relaxation, the adenosine analogues exhibited the following rank order of potency: NECA greater than CADO greater than R-PIA = MECA greater than S-PIA greater than adenosine. The rank order of potency for inducing contractions was R-PIA greater than CHA greater than CADO greater than S-PIA. These data suggest that relaxation is mediated by adenosine A2-receptors, whereas contraction is the result of activation of A1-receptors. 5. 8-Phenyltheophylline (8-PT), aminophylline, the triazoloquinazoline CGS 15943A and NPC205 (1,3-di-n-propyl-8-(4-hydroxyphenyl)xanthine) each inhibited the R-PIA-induced contractile response, whereas enprofylline was without effect. NPC205, aminophylline and 8-PT were competitive antagonists, but CGS15943A was non-competitive. 6. That the most potent antagonist was the A1-selective agent, NPC205 (pA2 = 7.80), further suggests that the contraction is mediated by A1-receptors. Moreover, NPC205 was 13 times more potent as an antagonist of R-PIA-induced contractions (A1) than of NECA-induced relaxations (A2). 7. The antagonists were also found to relax the trachea by an unknown mechanism. That enprofylline did not antagonize the R-PIA-induced contractions, but was 3-4 times more potent a tracheal relaxant than aminophylline, further suggests that a direct effect on airway smooth muscle, rather than antagonism of endogenous adenosine, is more relevant to the bronchodilator effect of alkylxanthines in the treatment of asthma.     

Adenosine receptor modulation of sympathetic neurotransmission in rat isolated kidney

In the present study we set out to define, using discriminatory agonists and antagonists, the adenosine receptors modulating sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat kidney. Isolated kidneys from male Wistar rats were perfused with modified Krebs-Henseleit buffer solution at constant flow. The neuronal noradrenaline stores were labeled with ³H-noradrenaline and the renal nerves stimulated electrically (2 Hz, 3 msec, 9 mA, during 20 sec at intervals of 6 min). ³H overflow was taken as an index of ³H-noradrenaline release. The A₁ receptor selective agonists N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), and N⁶-[R(−)-1-phenyl-2-propyl]adenosine (R-PIA), and the mixed A₁/A_2A receptor agonists 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) and 2-chloroadenosine (CADO) inhibited evoked ³H outflow concentration-dependently. The selective A_2A receptor agonist 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino]-5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680), at concentrations selective for A_2A receptors, failed to modify ³H outflow, whereas at higher concentrations it induced inhibition. The rank order of potency of agonists, CPA > CHA = R-PIA > NECA > CADO >> CGS 21680, is typical for an interaction with the A₁ receptor. 1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), at concentrations selective for blockade of A₁ receptors, blocked concentration-dependently the inhibitory effects of CPA and NECA; no evidence of an increase in outflow was seen with NECA in the presence of DPCPX. The selective A_2A receptor antagonist 9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)[1,2,4]triazol[1,5-c] quinazoline-5-amine (CGS 15943) did not influence the agonist effects at concentrations interacting selectively with A_2A receptors but antagonized them concentration-dependently at higher, non-selective concentrations. Taken together, our data establish the presence of inhibitory adenosine A₁ receptors on the terminal sympathetic neurons of rat kidney. No evidence was obtained for the presence of functional A_2A receptors in this preparation. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Different efficacy of adenosine and NECA derivatives at the human A3 adenosine receptor: Insight into the receptor activation switch

A₃ Adenosine receptors are promising drug targets for a number of diseases and intense efforts are dedicated to develop selective agonists and antagonists of these receptors. A series of adenosine derivatives with 2-(ar)-alkynyl chains, with high affinity and different degrees of selectivity for human A₃ adenosine receptors was tested for the ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase. All these derivatives are partial agonists at A₃ adenosine receptors; their efficacy is not significantly modified by the introduction of small alkyl substituents in the N⁶-position. In contrast, the adenosine-5′-N-ethyluronamide (NECA) analogs of 2-(ar)-alkynyladenosine derivatives are full A₃ agonists. Molecular modeling analyses were performed considering both the conformational behavior of the ligands and the impact of 2- and 5′-substituents on ligand–target interaction. The results suggest an explanation for the different agonistic behavior of adenosine and NECA derivatives, respectively. A sub-pocket of the binding site was analyzed as a crucial interaction domain for receptor activation.     

Adenosine receptors involved in the inhibitory control of non-adrenergic non-cholinergic neurotransmission in guinea-pig atria belong to the A1 subtype

Summary We have previously shown that endogenous adenosine inhibits non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) neurotransmission in isolated guinea-pig atria. In the present study the effect of adenosine analogues, such as N⁶cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 5 N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine (NECA), 2 chloroadenosine (2-CADO), R- and S-phenylisopropyladenosine (R- and S-PIA) on the cardiac response to transmural nerve stimulation has been tested in order to characterize the subtype of adenosine receptor involved in the inhibitory control of NANC neurotransmission. The effect of the adenosine antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT) was then tested against CPA and NECA.The prototypical A-1 selective agonist CPA was the most active agonist, reducing the response to the stimulation of NANC nerves with an IC₅₀ value of 2.8 nM; RPIA, NECA and 2-CADO showed IC₅₀ values of 9.5, 13.7 and 35 nM respectively. S-PIA was the least active agonist, showing an IC₅₀ value (306 nM) about 30-fold greater than that of R-PIA (9.5 nM). None of the agonists tested was able to modify cardiac response to exogenous CGRR Furthermore, 8-PT competitively antagonized the effect of CPA and NECA with very close pA₂ values (6.77±0.01 and 6.63±0.08 respectively). From these findings we concluded that prejunctional inhibitory adenosine receptors on capsaicin sensitive sensory nerves of cardiac tissue belong to the A-1 subtype. Send offprint requests to A. Rubino at the above address     

Involvement of adenosine receptors in mouse thermoregulation

The effects of the activation of adenosine receptors on core body temperature of mice have been studied in the present investigation. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of non-selective adenosine agonists 5'-N ethyl- carboxamide adenosine (NECA; 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg), R-(N(6)-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (R-PIA; 0.01, 0.1 and 0.25 mg/kg) and selective A(1) adenosine agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 0.1, 0.25 and 0.4 mg/kg) reduced core body temperature. However, R-PIA and CHA were less potent than NECA in reducing the core body temperature. Theophylline (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg) blocked the hypothermia of the adenosine agonists. Pre-treatment of animals with selective A(1) adenosine antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT; 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) decreased the hypothermic response of CHA but not of NECA and R-PIA. 8-PT potentiated the hypothermia induced by R-PIA. These results suggest that activation of both A(1) and A(2) adenosine receptors decreases core body temperature in mice.     

Effects of 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), a highly selective adenosine receptor antagonist,on force of contraction in guinea-pig atrial and ventricular cardiac preparations

Summary The effects of the A₁ adenosine receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) on force of contraction were examined in isolated electrically driven auricles and papillary muscles from guinea-pigs in the absence and presence of (–)-N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine (PIA) and 5-N-ethylcarboxamidadenosine (NECA).In auricles DPCPX (30–1000 nmol/l) alone increased force of contraction. DPCPX produced only a minor inhibition of phosphodiesterase I–III activity. PIA and NECA alone exerted concentration-dependent negative inotropic effects and the concentration-response curves for PIA and NECA were shifted competitively to the right by the adenosine receptor antagonist DPCPX with similar potency and efficacy. The pA₂-value for the inhibition of the effects of PIA and NECA were 9.1 and 8.8, respectively.In papillary muscles DPCPX alone had no inotropic effect. In the presence of isoprenaline PIA and NECA alone exerted concentration-dependent negative inotropic effects and again DPCPX shifted the concentration-response curves for PIA and NECA competitively to the right with similar potency and efficacy. The pA₂-value for the inhibition of the effects of PIA and NECA were 9.3 and 9.0, respectively.It is concluded that DPCPX is a potent competitive A₁ adenosine receptor antagonist in guinea-pig atrial and ventricular cardiac preparations. Since PIA and NECA were equally potent the cardiac adenosine receptor may constitute a subtype of A₁ adenosine receptors differing from the receptor in other tissues such as fat cells. Furthermore, DPCPX has a positive inotropic effect in atrial tissue which cannot be attributed to the A₁ receptor antagonism.Abbreviations cAMP cyclic adenosine-3,5-monophosphate - DPCPX 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine - IBMX 3-isobutyl-lmethylxanthine - NECA 5-N-ethylcarboxamidadenosine - PDE phosphodiesterase - PIA (–)-N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine Send offprint requests to J. Scholz at the present addressParts of the results have been presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Heart and Circulation Research (Scholz et al. 1988)     

Functional classification of P1-purinoceptors in guinea-pig left and right atria: anomalous characteristics of antagonism by cyclopentyltheophyline

The P₁ purinoceptor subtype mediating the negative inotropic responses of guinea-pig left atria and the negative chronotropic responses of beating right atria were characterized. Guinea-pig isolated paced left atria (2Hz, 5ms, threshold voltage+50%) and spontaneously beating right atria were set up in Krebs-bicarbonate solution and isometric tension and rate of contraction, respectively, were recorded. Concentration-response curves for the reduction of tension and rate, respectively, by adenosine receptor agonists, N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), the R- and S- stereoisomers of N⁶-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA and S-PIA), 5′-(N-carboxamido)adenosine (NECA) and 2-p-((carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino)-5′-(N-carboxamido)adenosine (CGS21680) were obtained. The orders of potency on the left atria (CPA=NECA>R-PIA>S-PIA>CGS21680) and right atria (CPA=R-PIA>S-PIA>CGS21680) were consistent with the responses being mediated via A₁ receptors. Antagonism of the responses to CPA or R-PIA by 8-cyclo-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT) was examined by a full Schild analysis. Concentration-response curves for CPA or R-PIA were obtained in the absence or presence of five or six concentrations (10^-7 -10^-5 or 3x10^-5M) of CPT. The shift in the concentration-response by CPT was expressed as the concentration-ratio (CR) and plotted as -log(CR-1) against log molar concentration of CPT (Schild plot). pA₂ values were calculated from the intercept on the concentration axis and by application of the equation; pA₂=log(antagonist concentration) -log (CR-1). The Schild plots had unity slopes indicating competitive antagonism and the pA₂ values derived therefrom indicated that the responses were mediated via A₁-receptor. Closer inspection of the Schild plots, however, showed that at the higher concentrations of CPT there was a limit to the displacement of the concentration-response curves of the left and right atria to CPA and of the left atria to R-PIA. There were also significant differences in the apparent pA₂ values calculated from the equation, when different concentrations of antagonist were examined. These results indicated that at higher concentrations of agonist there may be a component of the response that is resistant to antagonism by CPT. Whether this is related to the proposal that cardiac responses are mediated via A₃ receptors is discussed. Received: 27 September 1996 / Accepted: 27 February 1997