Mechanisms of L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester-induced antinociception in mice: a role for serotonergic and adrenergic neurons.

1. The mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive action of L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) were investigated in mice. 2. Intraperitoneal administration of L-NAME produced a dose-dependent antinociception in the tail-flick, hot-plate and phenyl-p-quinone-induced writhing tests. 3. Pretreatment with the catecholamine depletors 6-hydroxydopamine (5 micrograms i.c.v.) or reserpine (5 mg/kg i.p.) or the serotonin synthesis inhibitor, p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (200 mg/kg i.p. on 2 consecutive days) resulted in a significant decrease in the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. 4. Similarly, pretreatment with the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazonin (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.), or the non-selective alpha-adrenoceptor blocker, phentolamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) antagonized the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. 5. However, the administration of the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan (2.5 mg/kg i.p.) was without effect. 6. Likewise, pretreatment with the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor blocker, ketanserin (1 mg/kg, i.p.), the D2 dopamine receptor antagonist (+/-) sulpiride (30 mg/kg, i.p.) or the opioid antagonist naloxone (5 mg/kg, i.p.) did not inhibit the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. 7. These results suggest that L-NAME produces antinociception in the mouse probably by an action on adrenergic and serotonergic synapses.     

The involvement of nitric oxide in the antinociception induced by cyclosporin A in mice

Cyclosporin A (CsA) and other immunophilin-binding agents are known to inactivate neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). Nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the nociception at the spinal level. We evaluated the effect of acute intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of CsA on the tail-flick response in mice and the involvement of NO and opioid receptors in this effect. CsA (5, 10, 20 and 50 mg/kg i.p.) induced a significant increase in tail-flick response. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (LNNA; 10, 40 and 80 mg/kg i.p.) significantly potentiated the CsA-induced (5 mg/kg) increase in tail-flick latency (TFL). While NOS substrate L-arginine (100, 200, 400 mg/kg i.p.) inhibited the CsA-induced (20 mg/kg) antinociception completely and in a dose-dependent manner. Concomitant administration of L-NNA and L-arginine blocked the inhibition exerted by the latter on the CsA-induced antinociception. The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (4 mg/kg i.p.) did not alter the CsA effect. These results indicate that acute administration of CsA induces an antinociceptive effect that involves the L-arginine-NO pathway but is not mediated by opioid receptors.     

Are 5-HT receptors or beta-adrenoceptors involved in idazoxan-induced food and water intake?

Idazoxan (10 mg/kg, i.p.) produces an unexpected increase in food intake in freely-feeding rats which has been linked to its high affinity for non-adrenoceptor idazoxan binding sites. In this study, a dose-related antagonism of idazoxan-induced food intake by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist (-)-propranolol (5-20 mg/kg, i.p.), which also blocks 5-HT1 (5-hydroxytryptamine1) receptors has been demonstrated. (+)-Propranolol (10, 20 mg/kg, i.p.) did not attenuate idazoxan-induced feeding. (-)-Propranolol (10 mg/kg, i.p.) but not the (+)-enantiomer (10 mg/kg, i.p.) also significantly inhibited the food intake, induced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.). Idazoxan-induced feeding was not altered by the selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists betaxolol (beta 1; 5 mg/kg, i.p.) and ICI 118,551 (beta 2; 5 mg/kg, i.p.) but was potentiated by the 5-HT receptor antagonist metergoline (5 mg/kg, i.p.). The anomalous findings with metergoline may reflect its action at different sub-types of 5-HT receptor. The water intake induced by idazoxan and the peripherally-active alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist L-659,066 was also blocked in a stereoselective manner by propranolol (10 mg/kg) but not significantly by either metergoline (5 mg/kg, i.p.), the beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist betaxolol (5 mg/kg, i.p.) nor by the beta 2-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI 118,551 (5 mg/kg, i.p.). These results suggest that the food intake induced by idazoxan (and perhaps mediated by non-adrenoceptor idazoxan binding sites) may involve the 5-HT system, although further studies, using antagonists acting selectively at the different sub-types of 5-HT receptor, are required to confirm this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Absence of 5-HT3 and cholinergic mechanisms in improgan antinociception

Improgan, an analgesic derived from histamine antagonists, acts in the brain stem to activate descending non-opioid, pain-relieving circuits, but the mechanism of action of this drug remains elusive. Because improgan has a moderate affinity for 5-HT(3) receptors, and, since cholinergic and serotonergic drugs can modulate descending analgesic circuits, roles for 5-HT(3), nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in improgan antinociception were presently investigated in rats. Improgan (80 microg, icv) induced nearly maximal inhibition of hot plate and tail flick nociceptive responses, and these actions we unaffected by antagonists of muscarinic (atropine, 5.9 mg/kg, i.p.) and nicotinic (mecamylamine, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) receptors. Control experiments verified that these antagonist treatments were maximally effective against muscarinic and nicotinic antinociception in both tests. In addition, improgan antinociception was unaffected by icv pretreatment with a 5-HT(3) antagonist (ondansetron, 20 microg). When given alone, icv treatment with neither this antagonist nor a 5-HT(3) agonist (m-chlorophenylbiguanide, 1000 nmol, icv) modified thermal nociceptive latencies. These results show no role for supraspinal cholinergic and 5-HT(3) receptors in improgan antinociception. The findings help to narrow the search for the relevant mediators of the action of this novel analgesic agent.     

Potentiation of imipramine-induced antinociception by nicotine in the formalin test.

In this study, the effect of cholinergic agents on imipramine antinociception in mice, in the formalin test, has been investigated. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of different doses of imipramine (2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg) or nicotine (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 mg/kg) induced a dose dependent antinociception in both the first and second phases of the formalin test in mice. The combination of imipramine with doses of 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg of nicotine showed a potentiated response, in both phases of the test. However, neither hexamethonium (5 and 10 mg/kg), atropine (0.25 mg/kg) or mecamylamine (0.25 mg/kg) altered the antinociception induced by imipramine. It is concluded that nicotinic receptor activation but not the cholinergic muscarinic mechanism is involved in the imipramine-induced antinociception.     

Antinociceptive properties of the ethanolic extract and of the triterpene 3beta,6beta,16beta-trihidroxilup-20(29)-ene obtained from the flowers of Combretum leprosum in mice

The present study examined the antinociceptive effects of the ethanolic extract (EE) and of the triterpene 3beta,6beta,16beta-trihidroxilup-20(29)-ene obtained from the flowers of Combretum leprosum in chemical and thermal behavioural models of pain in mice. The EE (10-1000 mg/kg) given orally (p.o.), 1 h prior to testing, produced dose-dependent inhibition of acetic acid-induced visceral pain, with mean ID50 value of 131.9 mg/kg. In the formalin test, the EE (10-300 mg/kg, p.o.) also caused significant inhibition of both the early (neurogenic pain) and the late (inflammatory pain) phases of formalin-induced licking, however, it was more potent and efficacious in relation to the late phase of the formalin test, with mean ID50 values for the neurogenic and the inflammatory phases of approximately 300 and 88.8 mg/kg, respectively. The EE (10-1000 mg/kg, p.o.) also caused significant and dose-dependent inhibition of capsaicin- and glutamate-induced pain, with mean ID50 values of 160.5 and 38.3 mg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, the triterpene 3beta,6beta,16beta-trihidroxilup-20(29)-ene (1-30 mg/kg), given p.o., 1 h prior to testing, also produced dose-related inhibition of glutamate-induced pain, with a mean ID50 value of 5.6 mg/kg. When assessed in a thermal model of pain, the EE (10-300 mg/kg, p.o.) and fentanyl (100 microg/kg, s.c.) caused a significant and marked increase in the latency response on the hot-plate test (50 degrees C). The antinociception caused by EE (100 mg/kg, p.o.) in the glutamate test was significantly attenuated by intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatment of mice with naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg), pindolol (a 5-HT 1A/1B receptor/beta adrenoceptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg), WAY100635 (a 5-HT 1A receptor antagonist, 0.7 mg/kg) or ketanserin (a 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist, 0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, EE (100 mg/kg, p.o.) antinociception was affected neither by L-arginine (precursor of nitric oxide, 600 mg/kg) nor by ondansetron (a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, 0.5 mg/kg) i.p. treatment. It was not associated with non-specific effects such as muscle relaxation or sedation. Together, these results indicate that EE produces dose-related antinociception in several models of chemical and thermal pain through mechanisms that involve an interaction with opioid and serotonergic (i.e., through 5-HT 1A/1B and 5-HT 2A receptors) systems.     

5-Hydroxytryptamine-induced vasodilator responses in the hindquarters of the anaesthetized rat, involve beta2-adrenoceptors

These studies were conducted to examine the role of the vasoactive mediators nitric oxide (NO) and adrenaline (epinephrine) in the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT)-induced vasodilator response in the hindquarter vascular bed of anaesthetized rats. Intra-arterial administration of doses of 5-HT in the range 0.12-25 ng kg(-1) produced a dose-independent vasodilator effect in the hindquarters. The selective 5-HT(1D/1B) receptor agonist, L-694,247 at intra-arterial doses of 0.0012-1000 ng kg(-1), as well as adrenaline (at doses of 0.05-50 ng kg(-1) i.a.), mimicked the dose-independent vasodilator effect induced by intra-arterial administration of 5-HT. Intravenous pre-treatment with the selective beta2-receptor antagonist ICI 118,551 (0.5 mg kg(-1)) blocked the vasodilator effect of 5-HT, adrenaline and L-694,247. Additionally, the inhibitor of NO synthase NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NAME) (at a dose of 10 mg kg(-1) i.v.) blocked the vasodilator action of acetylcholine 300-3000 ng kg(-1)) but did not modify 5-HT-induced vasodilatation. The vasodilator effect produced by intra-arterial administration of 5-HT in the hindquarters was significantly inhibited both 30 min after denervation of the lumbar sympathetic chains and 1 h after bilateral adrenalectomy. Our data suggest that in the in-situ autoperfused hindquarters of the rat 5-HT-induced vasodilatation is mediated by a local 5-HT(1D) or 5-HT(1D/1B) activation, which in turn mediates the adrenal release of adrenaline, which then produces beta2-activation and vasodilatation.     

Antinociception after both peripheral and intrathecal injection of oxotremorine is modulated by spinal nitric oxide.

The present study investigated the role of spinal nitric oxide (NO) in the antinociception induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intrathecal (i.th.) injection of oxotremorine. The experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats, which had cannulas chronically implanted in the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord. Antinociceptive effects were evaluated using a tail-flick and a paw pressure test. To raise the spinal NO level, the rats received the NO donor, 3-morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1, 10 and 100 microg/5 microl); to lower the NO level, the inhibitor of NO synthase, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 50 and 400 microg/5 microl), was administered. Both those substances were injected i.th. Systemic injections of oxotremorine (0.02 and 0.1 mg/kg) produced a significant increase in the thermal nociceptive threshold, while the mechanical threshold was affected only by the higher dose (0.1 mg/kg) of the muscarinic agonist. I.th. injections of oxotremorine (0.1 ng, 1 ng, 1 microg/5 microl) produced significant antinociception in both those tests. I.th. administration of SIN-1 in doses which themselves did not affect the nociceptive threshold antagonized both the peripheral and central oxotremorine antinociception. I.th. administration of L-NAME (50 and 400 microg/5 microl) did not change the nociceptive threshold, but dose-dependently potentiated the effects of oxotremorine injected i.p. in both tests; however, the effect of i.th. administration of oxotremorine was potentiated only in the tail-flick test. Our results demonstrate that irrespective of the way of its injection, the antinociceptive effect of oxotremorine is modulated by activity of the spinal NO. Moreover, our results further support the hypothesis that NO present in the spinal cord exerts pronociceptive effects.     

Nitric oxide involvement in consolidation, but not retrieval phase of cognitive performance enhanced by atorvastatin in mice

Atorvastatin, a widely-used medication in treatment of hypercholesterolemia, has shown some benefits in treating cognition impairment in Alzheimer's disease. In this study, effects of atorvastatin on spatial recognition memory and the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) has been determined on consolidation and retrieval of memory in a two-trial recognition Y-maze test. Memory was impaired using scopolamine (1mg/kg, i.p.); atorvastatin (1, 5mg/kg, p.o.) was administered, either in presence or in absence of a non-specific NO synthase inhibitor, L-NAME (3, 10mg/kg, i.p.); a specific inducible NO synthase inhibitor, aminoguanidine (100mg/kg, i.p.); and a NO precursor, L-arginine (750 mg/kg, i.p.). Results: 1) atorvastatin (5mg/kg) significantly improved memory performance in a dose-dependent manner on consolidation and retrieval stage of memory in scopolamine-treated mice; 2) the beneficial effects of atorvastatin on memory consolidation was significantly reversed by L-NAME (10mg/kg) and aminoguanidine; 3) L-arginine slightly potentiated the effects of sub-effective dose of atorvastatin (1mg/kg) on memory consolidation; 4) either L-NAME (up to 10mg/kg), or aminoguanidine did not affect the memory improvement by atorvastatin on retrieval stage; 5) the effects of sub-effective dose of atorvastatin (1mg/kg) on retrieval of memory were not potentiated by L-arginine. The present study demonstrates that atorvastatin improves both consolidation and retrieval phases of memory. This effect is affected by NO synthase inhibitors and NO precursor, L-arginine, only in memory consolidation phase, but not in retrieval phase. It is concluded that NO might be involved in consolidation of spatial memory improvement by atorvastatin.     

Mechanisms involved in the antinociception caused by agmatine in mice

The present study examined the antinociceptive effects of agmatine in chemical behavioural models of pain. Agmatine (1-30 mg/kg), given by i.p. route, 30 min earlier, produced dose-dependent inhibition of acetic acid-induced visceral pain, with mean ID50 value of 5.6 mg/kg. Given orally, 60 min earlier, agmatine (10-300 mg/kg) also produced dose-related inhibition of the visceral pain caused by acetic acid, with mean ID50 value of 147.3 mg/kg. Agmatine (3-100 mg/kg, i.p.) also caused significant and dose-dependent inhibition of capsaicin- and glutamate-induced pain, with mean ID50 values of 43.7 and 19.5 mg/kg, respectively. Moreover, agmatine (1-100 mg/kg, i.p.) caused marked inhibition of both phases of formalin-induced pain, with mean ID50 values for the neurogenic and the inflammatory phases of 13.7 and 5.6 mg/kg, respectively. The antinociception caused by agmatine in the acetic acid test was significantly attenuated by i.p. treatment of mice with L-arginine (precursor of nitric oxide, 600 mg/kg), naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg), p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (PCPA, an inhibitor of serotonin synthesis, 100 mg/kg once a day for 4 consecutive days), ketanserin (a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, 0.3 mg/kg), ondansetron (a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, 0.5 mg/kg), yohimbine (an alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, 0.15 mg/kg) or by efaroxan (an I1 imidazoline/alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg). In contrast, agmatine antinociception was not affected by i.p. treatment of animals with pindolol (a 5-HT1A/1B receptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg) or idazoxan (an I2 imidazoline/alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, 3 mg/kg). Likewise, the antinociception caused by agmatine was not affected by neonatal pre-treatment with capsaicin. Together, these results indicate that agmatine produces dose-related antinociception in several models of chemical pain through mechanisms that involve an interaction with opioid, serotonergic (i.e., through 5-HT2A and 5-HT3 receptors) and nitrergic systems, as well as via an interaction with alpha2-adrenoceptors and imidazoline I1 receptors.     

Fluoxetine suppresses morphine tolerance and dependence: modulation of NO-cGMP/DA/serotoninergic pathways

Although the phenomenon of opioid tolerance and dependence has been widely investigated, neither opioid nor non-opioid mechanisms are completely understood. In view of the modulation of 5-HT transport into presynaptic terminals in the brain by nitric oxide (NO) via cGMP, and the existence of a tonic 5-HTergic inhibition of dopamine release, the present study investigated the effect of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and NO modulators L-N(G)-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME; NO synthase inhibitor) and L-Arginine (substrate for nitric oxide synthase) alone or in combination against morphine tolerance and dependence. Animals developed tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of morphine (10 mg/kg s.c. twice daily) on day 3 and the degree of tolerance was further enhanced on days 9 and 10. The development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of morphine was delayed by prior administration of fluoxetine (10 mg/kg i.p, twice daily for 9 days) and L-NAME (10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily for 9 days) alone or in combination. It was accentuated by L-Arginine (50 mg/kg i.p. twice daily for 9 days) alone or in combination with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily for 9 days). Similarly, fluoxetine (10 mg/kg i.p.) or L-NAME (10 mg/kg i.p.), when administered acutely on day 10, reversed morphine-induced tolerance. L-Arginine (50 mg/kg i.p.) however, when administered acutely on day 10, accentuated morphine tolerance. Fluoxetine (10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily for 9 days) suppressed the development of morphine dependence as assessed by naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.)-precipitated withdrawal jumps. This suppression of dependence was potentiated by L-NAME (10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily for 9 days) and reversed by L-Arginine (50 mg/kg i.p. twice daily for 9 days), respectively. Acute administration of the respective drugs on day 10 modulated morphine dependence in a similar fashion. L-Arginine also reversed fluoxetine-induced weight loss in morphine-dependent animals. The present study demonstrated that fluoxetine suppressed the dependence and development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Fluoxetine-induced suppression was potentiated by L-NAME and accentuated by L-Arginine. The results therefore suggest that a complex phenomenon such as morphine tolerance and dependence might involve close interplay of the NO-c GMP/5-HT/DA receptor system. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report to suggest targeting this cascade for amelioration of opioid tolerance and withdrawal syndrome.     

Fluoxetine attenuates thermal hyperalgesia through 5-HT1/2 receptors in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice

Diabetic neuropathic pain, an important microvascular complication in diabetes mellitus, is recognised as one of the most difficult types of pain to treat. A lack of understanding of its aetiology, inadequate relief, development of tolerance and potential toxicity of classical antinociceptives warrant the investigation of newer agents to relieve this pain. The aim of the present study was to explore the antinociceptive effect and possible mechanism of action of a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Four weeks after a single intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (200 mg/kg), mice were tested in the tail-immersion and hot-plate assays. Diabetic mice exhibited significant hyperalgesia compared with control mice. Fluoxetine (10 and 20, but not 5 mg/kg, i.p.) injected into diabetic mice produced an antinociceptive effect in both the tail-immersion and hot-plate assays. The percentage maximum possible effect (% MPE) produced by fluoxetine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) was significantly lower in diabetic mice than in control mice. The antinociceptive effect of fluoxetine (20 mg/kg) in diabetic mice was dose-dependently potentiated by pindolol (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p., a selective 5-HT(1A/1B) receptor antagonist), attenuated by ritanserin (1 and 2 mg/kg, i.p., a selective 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor antagonist) and remained unaffected by ondansetron (1 and 2 mg/kg, i.p., a selective 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist) in both test systems. These results suggest that fluoxetine-induced antinociception primarily involves serotonin pathway modulation through 5-HT(1) and 5-HT(2) receptors, but not through 5-HT(3) receptors, in the chronic pain associated with streptozotocin-induced diabetic neuropathy. Further, the potentiation of the antinociceptive effect of fluoxetine by pindolol indicates the usefulness of a combination of an antidepressant and a 5-HT(1A/1B) receptor antagonist in the treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain in humans.     

5-HT1-like receptor agonists enhance wakefulness.

The effects of four 5-HT1-like receptor agonists (8-OH-DPAT, RU 24969, BEA 1654 and 5-carboxamidotryptamine) and some putative 5-HT1-like receptor antagonists on vigilance were examined in an attempt to clarify the role of 5-HT1-like receptors in the sleep-waking pattern of rats. Both 8-OH-DPAT (0.5-2.0 mg/kg, s.c.) and RU 24969 (0.5-2.0 mg/kg, s.c.) increased wakefulness and the latencies of slow wave and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. The slow wave and REM sleep were correspondingly decreased or completely abolished. The two other 5-HT1-like receptor agonists had either a slight (BEA 1654, 1.0-5.0 mg/kg, s.c.) or no (5-carboxamidotryptamine, 0.5-2.0 mg/kg, s.c.) effect on sleep pattern. The arousal effect of 8-OH-DPAT was further potentiated in rats pretreated with reserpine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.; 18 hr before 8-OH-DPAT). The non-selective 5-HT1-like and 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, methiothepin (2.0 mg/kg, i.p.) and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (16.0 mg/kg, s.c.), which is a putative antagonist at 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor subtypes, significantly potentiated the arousal effect of RU 24969. The putative 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, cyanopinolol (4.0 mg/kg, s.c.), mixed 5-HT1A receptor agonist/antagonist MDL 72832 (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) and the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (2.0 mg/kg) did not affect the vigilance, altered by RU 24969. These results suggest that the arousal effect of 5-HT1-like receptor agonists is probably not mediated by any of the subtypes of 5-HT1-like receptors or by an activation of a noradrenergic system.     

Systemic morphine produce antinociception mediated by spinal 5-HT7, but not 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the spinal cord

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The serotonergic system within the spinal cord have been proposed to play an important role in the analgesic effects of systemic morphine. Currently, seven groups of 5-HT receptors (5-HT1-7) have been characterized. One of the most recently identified subtypes of 5 HT receptor is the 5-HT7 receptor. We aimed to examine the role of spinal 5-HT7 receptors in the antinociceptive effects of systemic morphine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The involvement of spinal 5-HT7 receptor in systemic morphine antinociception was compared to that of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors by using the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist, SB-269970, the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, the selective 5-HT2 antagonist ketanserin as well as the non-selective 5-HT1,2,7 receptor antagonist, metergoline. Nociception was evaluated by the radiant heat tail-flick test. KEY RESULTS: I.t. administration of SB-269970 (10 microg) and metergoline (20 microg) completely blocked the s.c. administered morphine-induced (1, 3, 5 and 10 mg kg(-1)) antinociception in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, i.t. administration of SB-269970 (1, 3, 10 and 20 microg) and metergoline (1, 5, 10 and 20 microg) dose dependently inhibited the antinociceptive effects of a maximal dose of morphine (10 mg kg(-1), s.c.). I.t. administration of WAY 100635 (20 microg) or ketanserine (20 microg) did not alter morphine-induced (1, 3, 5 and 10 mg kg(-1), s.c.) antinociception. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that the involvement of spinal 5-HT7, but not of 5-HT1A or of 5-HT2 receptors in the antinociceptive effects of systemic morphine.     

Effect of benzodiazepines on central serotonergic neuron systems

Intracerebral (i.c.) injection of serotonin (5-HT) into mice induced head twitches in a dose-dependent manner at 10 min after injection. The head twitches induced by 5-HT (i.c.) were potentiated by the pretreatment of isocarboxazid (3 mg/kg i.p.), and inhibited by cyproheptadine (0.3 mg/kg i.p.), a 5-HT antagonist. Benzodiazepines such as fludiazepam and diazepam potentiated the head twitches induced by 5-HT (i.c.) in a dose-dependent manner. Mescaline (50 mg/kg i.p.) also induced head twitches in mice at 15 and 30 min after injection. Benzodiazepines potentiated the head twitches induced by mescaline in a dose-dependent manner. Cyproheptadine blocked the potentiating effect of benzodiazepines on the head twitches induced by both 5-HT (i.c.) and mescaline.By repeated administration of fludiazepam or diazepam for 5 days, the potentiating effect of both drugs on the head twitches induced by mescaline was unchanged and their anticonvulsant effects were not modified. In contrast, the potency of both drugs on muscle relaxation was significantly decreased by repeated administration.Benzodiazepines failed to change the uptake of 5-HT into the synaptosomal fractions from the rat brain.These results suggest that the pharmacological action of benzodiazepines is derived at least in part from their activating effect on 5-HT receptors.     

Potentiation by (-)Pindolol of the activation of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors induced by venlafaxine.

The increase of extracellular 5-HT in brain terminal regions produced by the acute administration of 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRI's) is hampered by the activation of somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors in the raphe nuclei. The present in vivo electrophysiological studies were undertaken, in the rat, to assess the effects of the coadministration of venlafaxine, a dual 5-HT/NE reuptake inhibitor, and (-)pindolol on pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor function. The acute administration of venlafaxine and of the SSRI paroxetine (5 mg/kg, i.v.) induced a suppression of the firing activity of dorsal hippocampus CA(3) pyramidal neurons. This effect of venlafaxine was markedly potentiated by a pretreatment with (-)pindolol (15 mg/kg, i.p.) but not by the selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol (15 mg/kg, i.p.). That this effect of venlafaxine was mediated by an activation of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors was suggested by its complete reversal by the 5-HT(1A) antagonist WAY 100635 (100 microg/kg, i.v.). A short-term treatment with VLX (20 mg/kg/day x 2 days) resulted in a ca. 90% suppression of the firing activity of 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus. This was prevented by the coadministration of (-)pindolol (15 mg/kg/day x 2 days). Taken together, these results indicate that (-)pindolol potentiated the activation of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors resulting from 5-HT reuptake inhibition probably by blocking the somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor, but not its postsynaptic congener. These results support and extend previous findings providing a biological substratum for the efficacy of pindolol as an accelerating strategy in major depression.     

Involvement of 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) receptors in nicotine-induced tail tremor in rats

Involvement of the serotonergic system in tail tremor induced by repeated administration of nicotine was investigated in rats. Tail tremor induced by nicotine (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) was suppressed by a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-?2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl-]ethyl?-N-(2-pyridinyl)cycloh exanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY-100635; 0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by a 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist, ketanserin (0.1-0.3 mg/kg, i.p). The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists, buspirone (1-20 mg/kg, i.p.), gepirone (1-10 mg/kg, i.p.), tandospirone (1-10 mg/kg, i.p.) and (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.01-0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), enhanced the tail tremor. The enhancement of tail tremor by buspirone (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was blocked by WAY-100635 (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.). These findings suggest that nicotine-induced tail tremor is mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors and that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists are effective in the treatment of tremor.     

Role of 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in the generalization of 5-HT receptor agonists to the ethanol cue in the rat

Although accumulating evidence suggests that serotonergic drugs are able to substitute for the ethanol (EtOH) cue in rats, it is still unclear which 5-HT receptor subtypes are responsible for this phenomenon, and whether these receptors are critically involved in the EtOH cue. In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate EtOH (1000 mg/kg, i.p., t-15 min) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced procedure, and it was investigated to which extent serotonergic compounds with a certain level of specificity for either 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors generalized to the EtOH cue. Subsequently, the involvement of these receptor subtypes was ascertained by the use of selected 5-HT receptor antagonists. The 5-HT1B receptor agonist CP 94,253 (0.3-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the mixed 5-HT(2C/1B) receptor agonist mCPP (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.), but not the preferential 5-HT2A receptor agonist DOI (0.3-1 mg/kg, i.p.), completely generalized to the EtOH cue. Complete generalization of the former two compounds coincided with a decrease in response rate. In antagonism studies, it was shown that the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist GR 127935 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) completely blocked generalization of CP 94,253 to the EtOH cue, suggesting that stimulation of 5-HT1B receptors produces discriminative stimulus effects which are similar to those of EtOH. GR 127935 (10 mg/kg, i.p.), as well as the mixed 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor antagonist metergoline (1 mg/kg, i.p.), and the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB 206,553 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) completely blocked generalization of mCPP to the EtOH cue. This suggests that 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C receptors are required for the generalization of mCPP to the EtOH cue. The present findings indicate that activation of 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C, but not of 5-HT2A receptors, mimics the EtOH cue. However, the finding that neither metergoline, nor the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907 blocked the EtOH cue, suggests that these receptors play only a minor role in the discriminative stimulus effects of a moderately low dose of EtOH.     

Influence of the 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist SB242,084 on behaviour produced by the 5-HT(2) agonist Ro60-0175 and the indirect 5-HT agonist dexfenfluramine

Ro60-0175 has been described as a selective agonist at the 5-HT(2C) receptor, yet it has only 10- fold higher affinity at the 5-HT(2C) compared to the 5-HT(2A) subtype, and equivalent affinity for the 5-HT(2B) receptor. The selective 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist SB242,084 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.p.), blocked the hypoactivity and penile grooming induced by Ro60-0175 (1 mg kg(-1) s.c.). The combination of SB242,084 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and Ro60-0175 (3 - 10 mg kg(-1)) produced a completely different pattern of behaviours including wet-dog shakes, hyperactivity and back muscle contractions. These latter effects were blocked by the selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist MDL100,907 (0.5 mg kg(-1) i.p.), but not the 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist SB215,505 (3 mg kg(-1) p.o.). The indirect 5-HT releaser/reuptake inhibitor dexfenfluramine (1 - 10 mg kg(-1) i.p.) produced a mild increase in locomotor activity, penile grooming, and occasional back muscle contractions and wet-dog shakes. Pre-treatment with SB242,084 (0.5 mg kg(-1)), blocked the incidence of penile grooming, and markedly potentiated both the dexfenfluramine-induced hyperactivity, the incidence of back muscle contractions, and to a lesser extent wet-dog shakes. Some toxicity was also evident in animals treated with dexfenfluramine (10 mg kg(-1))/SB242,084 (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but not in any other treatment groups. The hyperactivity and toxicity produced by the dexfenfluramine (10 mg kg(-1))/SB242,084 (0.5 mg kg(-1)) combination was replicated in a further study, and hyperthermia was also recorded. Both hyperthermia and toxicity were blocked by MDL100,907 (0.5 mg kg(-1)) but not SB215,505 (3 mg kg(-1)). An attenuation of the hyperlocomotor response was also observed following MDL100,907. These findings suggest that 5-HT(2C) receptor activation can inhibit the expression of behaviours mediated through other 5-HT receptor subtypes.     

Ejaculatory response induced by a 5-HT2 receptor agonist m-CPP in rats: differential roles of 5-HT2 receptor subtypes

It has been reported that systemic administration of m-CPP (1-[3-chlorophenyl] piperazine hydrochloride), a 5-HT(2) receptor agonist, produces a 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated penile erections and self-grooming in rats. In the present study, we examined the ability of m-CPP to induce ejaculation in rats and determined which 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes may be involved in the m-CPP-induced ejaculation. The ejaculatory response was assessed by weighing the seminal materials accumulated over 30 min. In Experiment 1, systemic administration of m-CPP (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a dose-dependent increase in both the incidence of ejaculation and the weight of the seminal materials. The inverted U-shaped dose-response effects of m-CPP on penile erection and genital grooming were also observed, with maximum effects at 0.6 mg/kg. Pretreatment with SB242084 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist, dose-dependently attenuated the ejaculatory response induced by m-CPP (3.0 mg/kg). The proejaculatory effect of m-CPP was also attenuated by ketanserin (0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, whereas SB204741 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist, significantly potentiated the m-CPP-induced ejaculatory response. Penile erection and genital grooming induced by m-CPP (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) was only blocked by SB242084. In Experiment 2 (termed as corset test), in rats fitted with a corset at the thoracic level to prevent the loss of seminal materials by genital grooming, the proejaculatory effect of m-CPP was more efficiently detected than in the non-fitted animals: the ED(50) value for inducing ejaculation was reduced to less than 50% of the ED(50) in non-fitted animals. In this test, the proejaculatory effect of m-CPP (0.6 mg/kg, i.p.) was completely blocked by SB242084 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), whereas ketanserin (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) or SB204741 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the m-CPP -induced ejaculation. From these observations, it is suggested that the 5-HT(2) receptor agonist m-CPP at low doses (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) possesses the proejaculatory as well as proerectile effects in rats that are primarily associated with the activation of 5-HT(2C) receptors, and that the activation of 5-HT2B receptors may produce an inhibitory effect on ejaculation induced by a high dose (3.0 mg/kg) of m-CPP. Furthermore, the results of the present study also indicate that the corset test employed in this study may be useful for detecting the proejaculatory effect of the compounds.