Valve prosthesis distortion after cardiac compression in a patient who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been developed as an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in high‐risk patients. Nevertheless, TAVI has been associated with serious complications such as stroke, vascular injury, renal failure, and arrhythmia. Herein we describe a case of distortion of the Edward‐Sapien prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, USA), which was mounted on a balloon‐expandable stent, after chest compression for cardiac resuscitation in a patient who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Next-Generation Transcatheter Heart Valves: Current Trials in Europe and the USA

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a viable alternative for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. At the same time, there is increasing evidence that moderate-to-severe periprosthetic aortic regurgitation after TAVI is associated with dramatically increased mortality and morbidity. The issue of proper positioning of the valve, including the ability to reposition and recapture the device, must be dealt with before the use of TAVI can be extended to younger, healthier patients. The next generation of transcatheter heart valves will most likely address repositionability to facilitate accurate placement with additional features that minimize paravalvular leakage. Upcoming devices promise to improve outcomes and usability of current TAVI systems.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Core Valve: First Indian experience of three high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis

The prevalence of aortic stenosis is increasing with aging population. However with multiple co-morbidities and prior procedures in this aging population, more and more patients are being declared unfit for the ‘Gold Standard’ treatment i.e. surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Among the patients who are unfit or high risk for aortic valve replacement (AVR) by open heart surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been proven to be a valuable alternative improving survival and quality of life. We report first Indian experience of Core Valve (Medtronic Inc.) implantation in three high surgical risk patients performed on 22nd and 23rd February 2012.     

Apico-Aortic Conduit for severe aortic stenosis: Technique,applications, and systematic review

Patients referred for aortic valve replacement are often elderly and may have increased surgical risk associated with ascending aortic calcification, left ventricular dysfunction, presence of coronary artery disease, previous surgery, and/or presence of several co-morbidities. Some of these patients may not be considered candidates for conventional surgery because of their high risk profile. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement constitutes a widely accepted alternative, some patients may not be eligible for this modality due to anatomic factors. Apico-Aortic Conduit (AAC) insertion (aortic valve bypass surgery) constitutes a possible option in those patients. Apico-Aortic Conduit is not a new technique, as it has been used for decades in both pediatric and adult populations. However, there is a resurging interest in this technique due to the expanding scope of elderly patients being considered for the treatment of aortic stenosis. Herein, we describe our surgical technique and provide a systematic review of recent publications on AAC insertion, reporting that there is continued use and several modifications of this technique, such as performing it through a small thoracotomy without the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass.Abbreviations: AAC, Apico Aortic Conduit; AS, aortic stenosis; AVR, aortic valve replacement; BSA, body surface area; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; DHCA, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest; FEM-FEM, femoro-femoral; ITA, internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LVOT, left ventricle outflow tract; NYHA, New York Heart Association; MDCT, multidetector-computerized tomography; MVR, mitral valve replacement; OPCAB, off pump coronary artery bypass; PH, pulmonary hypertension; RITA, right internal thoracic artery; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation     

Contemporary balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Changing indications and refined technique

Even if un to improve long-term prognosis, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) may be useful in selected patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis either as a bridge to surgical or transcatheter valve replacement (aortic valve replacement [AVR] or transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) or as a triage strategy for patients with uncertain indications. International guidelines recommend BAV as: a “bridge” to AVR/TAVI, a “trial” in patients with undetermined symptoms, or a “bridge-to-decision” in case of comorbidities. However, in clinical practice, BAV is also used as a palliative measure to improve hemodynamics and quality of life in many patients who are excluded from AVR/TAVI. Finally, BAV is often performed during TAVI to facilitate prosthesis delivery, optimize frame expansion, or for bioprosthetic valve fracture in selected valve-in-valve procedures. Technical innovations, which allow for a mini-invasive approach via transradial access and pacing delivered through the wire, have led to a decrease in complications over time. This review focuses on contemporary BAV with a specific emphasis on new indications, innovative techniques, and specific complex patient subgroups.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Current status and future perspectives

Although surgical aortic valve replacement is the standard therapy for severe aortic stenosis(AS),about one third of patients are considered inoperable due to unacceptable surgical risk.Under medical treatment alone these patients have a very poor prognosis with a mortality rate of 50%at 2 years.Transcatheter aortic valve implantation(TAVI)has been used in these patients,and has shown robust results in the only randomized clinical trial of severe AS treatment performed so far.In this review,we will focus on the two commercially available systems:Edwards SAPIEN valve and CoreValve Revalving system.Both systems have demonstrated success rates of over 90%with 30-d mortality rates below 10%in the most recent transfemoral TAVI studies.Moreover,long-term studies have shown that the valves have good haemodynamic performance.Some studies are currently exploring the non-inferiority of TAVI procedures vs conventional surgery in high-risk patients,and long-term clinical results of the percutaneous valves.In this article we review the current status of TAVI including selection of patients,a comparison of available prostheses,results and complications of the procedure,clinical outcomes,and future perspectives.     

Rescue “valve in valve” implantation after late onset corevalve cusp rupture leading to acute massive aortic insufficiency

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a feasible and effective alternative to aortic valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk, and is associated with a lower risk of death at 1 year follow‐up when compared with standard therapy. In a recent large study, enrolling 663 high risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis TAVI with the use of CoreValve system has been associated with early and sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits, with a cumulative mortality of 15.0% at 1 year follow‐up. This study has shown that paravalvular aortic regurgitation after successful TAVI is a frequent finding, being of mild entity in the vast majority of cases, whereas valvular regurgitation is almost entirely absent or mild. Of note, no cases of structural valve deterioration were reported. We report a case of a successful implantation of a CoreValve that complicated with late onset massive intravalvular aortic regurgitation, due to CoreValve cusp rupture, leading to low output state with acute pulmonary edema, which was successfully treated with “valve in valve” implantation. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation 10 years after valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing aortic valve homograft root replacement

Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV‐TAVI) is an established therapy for a degenerated surgical bioprosthesis. TAVI‐in‐TAVI following ViV‐TAVI has not been previously performed. We report a high‐risk patient presenting with severe left ventricular failure secondary to undiagnosed critical aortic stenosis due to degeneration of the implanted transcatheter heart valve more than a decade after initial ViV‐TAVI for a failing stentless aortic valve homograft. Successful TAVI‐in‐TAVI reversed the clinical and echocardiographic changes of decompensated heart failure with no evidence of coronary obstruction.     

The Importance of Echocardiography in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Valvular heart diseases cause serious health problems in Turkey as well as in Western countries. According to a study conducted in Turkey, aortic stenosis (AS) is second after mitral valve disease among all valvular heart diseases. AS is frequently observed in elderly patients who have several cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. In symptomatic severe AS, surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a definitive treatment. However, in elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction and comorbidities, the risk of operative morbidity and mortality increases and outweighs the gain obtained from AVR surgery. As a result, almost one‐third of the patients with serious AS are considered ineligible for surgery. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic severe AS who have high risk for conventional surgery. Since being performed for the first time in 2002, with a procedure success rate reported as 95% and a mortality rate of 5%, TAVI has become a promising method. Assessment of vascular anatomy, aortic annular diameter, and left ventricular function may be useful for the appropriate selection of patients and may reduce the risk of complications. Cardiac imaging methods including 2D and 3D echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography are critical during the evaluation of suitable patients for TAVI as well as during and after the procedure. In this review, we describe the role of echocardiography methods in clinical practice for TAVI procedure in its entirety, i.e. from patient selection to guidance during the procedure, and subsequent monitoring.     

Setting up a transcatheter aortic valve implantation program: Indian perspective

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the management of elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in the western world. It is a valuable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients, who are inoperable or at high surgical risk due to co-morbidities. The prevalence of aortic stenosis increases sharply with age after the sixth decade and is expected to have a significant impact on the geriatric health care system of India, given the rapid increase in life expectancy in recent years. Although a decade has passed since the first TAVI implantation, it is yet to penetrate most of the developing countries in a major way. This short review focuses on fundamentals of initiating a TAVI program based on the experience of a high volume TAVI center with a successful program in Germany.     

Role of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in the Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease

Conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery has been in clinical use since 1960. Results, particularly in high-risk populations such as the very elderly and frail, continue to improve in response to the challenges posed by this growing segment of the patient population. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a fairly recent development, performed for the first time in 2002. The last decade has seen an exponential growth in the application of this technology in higher-risk populations. Results of recent randomized prospective trials demonstrate both the future promise and current problems of the TAVI approach. Many patients deemed inoperable for AVR have been treated successfully by TAVI. However, elevated procedural and late mortality rates, excessive early and late stroke, and a significant incidence of periprosthetic aortic valve insufficiency and patient-prosthesis mismatch all suggest caution in extending this technology to patients able to undergo conventional AVR with a low risk of early or late complications.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patient with cardiogenic shock

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, who are at high or intermediate risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. The vast majority of TAVI are performed on patients without acute decompensated heart failure. In this case report we present the successful TAVI in a patient with a cardiogenic shock.     

Advanced age and the clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implan-tation

Aortic valve stenosis （AS） is common in the elderly. Although surgical replacement of the valve has been the gold standard of management, many patients have been excluded from surgery because they were very old, frail, or had co-morbidities that increased operative risks. In the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation （TAVI） has emerged as a new treatment option suitable for these patients. This article reviews the available literature on the role of TAVI in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. Published studies showed that elderly individuals who underwent TAVI experienced better in-hospital recovery, and similar short and mid-term mortality compared to those underwent surgical treatment of AS. However, long-term outcomes of TAVI in elderly patients are still unknown. The available data in the literature on the ef-fect of advanced age on clinical outcomes of TAVI are limited, but the data that are available suggest that TAVI is a beneficial and tolerable procedure in very old patients. Some of the expected complications after TAVI are reported more in the oldest patients such as vascular in-jures. Other complications were comparable in TAVI patients regardless of their age group. However, very old patients may need closer monitoring to avoid further morbidities and mortality.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using direct aortic access: first procedures in Poland

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative option for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients carrying an elevated operative risk of conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Recently, data from randomised clinical trials confirmed superiority of TAVI when compared with the conservative treatment in inoperable patients, and its non-inferiority when compared with AVR in a high-risk population. Transfemoral vascular access remains the preferred route for delivering the bioprosthesis. However, in a significant proportion of patients, the presence of severe iliac-femoral arteriopathy or small vessel diameter render the transfemoral approach unusable. In this article, we report the first Polish experience of two successful TAVI procedures with bioprostheses (both balloon- and self-expandable) delivered using direct aortic access.     

Who is the right patient for TAVI?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly emerged as a valid therapeutic option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are high risk or ineligible for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. Despite its minimally invasive nature, TAVI is invariably associated with complications in these old patients that may affect outcomes. Although the success of TAVI is determined by multiple factors, good screening and appropriate patient selection is crucial. Selection of the right patient includes the determination of risk levels and feasibility of a safe procedure in each individual case. Here, we describe below our critical appraisal of patient selection for TAVI.     

Fungal endocarditis after transfemoral aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was introduced in 2006 as an alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as treatment for patients with aortic stenosis. Endocarditis after TAVI has been anecdotally reported, but concerns aroused because SAVR is often needed to explant the endocarditic valve in a high risk patient previously deemed not to be a surgical candidate. We report a case of a patient who underwent TAVI because he was too high risk to undergo SAVR. Several months later, he developed an intermittent self‐limiting fever of unknown origin which eventually was diagnosed as endocarditis. The valve was surgically removed, and pathology showed an infection caused by Histoplasma capsulatum. The patient recovered fully and remains in good condition.© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Cirurgia cardíaca na estenose aórtica severa: o que mudou com o advento do tratamento percutâneo?

Introduction and objectiveTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative therapeutic approach to patients not considered suitable for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) due to their high operative risk. We sought to assess the impact of TAVI on the profile and operative results of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing SAVR.MethodsA total of 214 patients were included, of whom 103 consecutive patients underwent isolated SAVR in 2005 and 111 in 2009. Patients’ demographic and operative data were collected retrospectively. Operative and one-year mortality and morbidity were analyzed.ResultsPatients’ mean age was 70 years, and 56% were female. Following the introduction of a TAVI program, patients undergoing conventional surgery were older, with more comorbidities. Overall 30-day and one-year mortality were 2.8% and 7.0%, respectively. After the introduction of TAVI, the observed mortality rate for SAVR decreased, but not significantly (operative mortality: 3.9% before TAVI vs. 1.8% after TAVI, p=NS; one-year mortality: 10% vs. 4.5%, p=NS). Striking differences were observed in morbidity (operative morbidity: 23.3% before TAVI vs. 13.5% after TAVI, p=0.047, and one-year morbidity: 20.4% vs. 9.9%, p=0.032).ConclusionsSince the introduction of a TAVI program at our center, the number of patients undergoing SAVR has increased, with a slight rise in surgical risk, but without worsening the final operative results. The implementation of a TAVI program has thus had a positive impact on the volume of procedures, patient selection and outcomes in SAVR.     

Challenging TAVI imaging case with Portico valve

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is considered as an appropriate alternative to surgical valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis at moderate to high perioperative risk. There have also been case reports and patient series using TAVI system in patients with predominant or pure symptomatic aortic regurgitation. We report a case of a patient with symptomatic combined aortic valve disease that was successfully treated with selfexpandable Portico system despite extremely elliptical annulus.     

Considerations in antithrombotic therapy among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aortic stenosis (AS) accounts for the majority of valvular abnormalities requiring surgical intervention. Platelet dysfunction has been demonstrated among patients with severe aortic stenosis which may predispose patients to bleeding or ischemic events. Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the standard therapy for severe symptomatic AS; however, a number of patients have very high or prohibitive surgical risk. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been shown to be superior to medical therapy among inoperable patients and non-inferior to AVR in patients with high surgical risk. In comparison to AVR, TAVI has been associated with a higher incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events, conduction abnormalities necessitating permanent pacemaker placement, and vascular complications. Current practice guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following TAVI using a combination of low dose aspirin and clopidogrel for 3–6 months. This regimen may be adjusted in patients with clinical bleeding events or indications for concomitant systemic anticoagulation. Recent and ongoing trials aim to clarify the optimum antithrombotic regimen and duration of therapy following TAVI. Collectively, early studies have not revealed additional benefit of adding clopidogrel to aspirin therapy in regards to reducing ischemic events, but have shown a trend towards increase in major bleeding. TAVI has proven successful, and as its breadth of utility is expanded, further studies are needed to define optimum antithrombotic therapy following TAVI. This article will review the current data for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy following TAVI.     

Lessons Learned from Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Experience from the Pre‐transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Era

Background: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been used as a bridge to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in high‐risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Such patients are now being referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to study the indications and outcomes of BAV in patients with severe AS in the pre‐TAVI era. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients with severe AS undergoing BAV from 1990 to 2005. In these patients with no immediate surgical option, BAV was attempted to temporarily improve hemodynamics, with a goal to improve general health of the patient, and ultimately AVR. Results : A total of 99 BAVs (eight repeats, one second repeat) were performed in 90 consecutive patients. Baseline ejection fraction was ≤25% in 36 (36%) patients. The 30‐day mortality rate was 17% (n = 17). Of the 99 patients, 27 (30%) underwent AVR. Average follow‐up of patients with and without AVR was 55 ± 57 months and 16 ± 23 months, respectively. The 6‐month and 1‐year survival rates in patients who underwent AVR were 81% and 78%, respectively, versus 57% and 44% in patients who did not undergo AVR (P = 0.024). Conclusion: BAV can be used successfully to clinically improve the health of some nonsurgical patients with severe symptomatic AS, and a proportion of these patients improve to a point where AVR can be performed. Bridging to TAVI will provide further options to high‐risk patients who cannot be bridged to conventional AVR. The role of BAV in bridging to TAVI merits further study. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:499–508)