Standards, options and recommendations for tumor markers in colorectal cancer]

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public University or General Hospitals, and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in colorectal cancer and their potential role in the management of patients with this malignancy. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 117 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the tumor markers in colorectal cancer are: 1) The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the reference serum marker (standard). 2) All the analyses for a given patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 3) CEA or CA 19-9 should not be used for screening or diagnosis (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) High initial serum concentration of CEA is of bad predictive value (standard, level of evidence C). CEA is an independent prognostic factor of survival in colorectal cancers with lymph node metastases (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) CEA is the most sensitive biological parameter for the screening of hepatic metastases (standard, level of evidence B2). 6) CEA serum concentration before palliative chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor of survival (standard, level of evidence B2). The combination of CEA assay with imagery techniques and clinical examination can help monitor the response to palliative chemotherapy (standard), in particular in non measurable disease (standard, expert agreement). 7) In 65% of the cases, CEA is the first indicator of relapse (standard, level of evidence B2). CEA is the choice marker for monitoring patients with colorectal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 8) A sustained biological follow-up including CEA assay can be used to predict the operability of recurring tumors (standard, level of evidence B2). Nevertheless, no survival advantage has been shown (standard).     

Standards, options, and recommendation for external radiotherapy of prostatic cancer: evaluation of the effect of dosage]

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) collaborative project was initiated in 1993 by the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), with the 20 French Regional Cancer Centres, several French public university and general hospitals, as well as private clinics and medical speciality societies. Its main objective is the development of serviceable clinical practice guidelines in order to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review, followed by critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. Draft guidelines are produced, then validated by specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: Produce clinical practice guidelines for the radiotherapy of prostate cancer using the methodology developed by the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: The FNCLCC and the French Urology Association (AFU) designated the multidisciplinary group of experts. Available data were collected by a search of Medline and lists selected by experts in the group. A first draft of the guidelines was written, they validated by independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1/ a minimal dose of 70 Gy must be used, whatever the prognostic factors; 2/ it appeared that patients with favourable prognostic indicators (stage T1-2, PSA < or = 10 micrograms/L and Gleason score < or = 6) do not benefit from a dose escalation effect for doses over 70-74 Gy; 3/ patients with intermediate prognosis are the ones who benefit most from the dose escalation effect over 74 Gy, provided they receive exclusive radiation therapy; 4/ whenever possible, patients should be included in controlled trials designed to assess the effects of dose escalation and hormonotherapy.     

Standards, options and recommendations for blood tumor markers in thyroid cancers

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in thyroid cancer and the potential role of these markers in the management of patients with this malignancy. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 55 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) Thyroglobulin is a serum tumor marker for the monitoring of operated thyroid differentiated neoplasms (standard). 2) It is essential to know if the patient is under TSH stimulation or under thyroid suppression therapy to interpret thyroglobulin results (standard). 3) Thyroglobulin assay must be performed regularly during the monitoring of differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2), should be coupled with the measurement of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies concentration using a sensitive method (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) Thyroglobulin assay should not be performed to detect or diagnose differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) The methods used to assay thyroglobulin must have a limit of detection lower than 3 mug.l- 1 (standard, expert agreement). 6) Calcitonin is a marker for medullary thyroid cancer (standard). 7) Its assay, associated with RET gene study if indicated, enables medullary thyroid cancer to be diagnosed. 8) The pentagastrin test is essential to diagnose familial forms of medullary thyroid cancer. 9) All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 10) Calcitonin and carcinoembryonic-antigen are serum markers for the monitoring of medullary thyroid cancer and allow the detection of recurrent disease (standard).     

Standards, options and recommendations: nutritional support in palliative or terminal care of adult patients with progressive cancer]

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 95 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for nutritional support in adult patients with advanced or terminal cancer are: 1) Palliative care has been defined in a consensual way and is governed by the law (standard). Nutritional support is a palliative care which aim is to maintain and restore the "well-being" of the patient (standard). 2) Digestive symptoms and nutritional troubles are frequently noted in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). Karnofsky index (KPS) and performance status (PS) are functional scores with a prognostic value and have to be used (standard, level of evidence B2). 3) Anorexia has a bad predictive value in patients with advanced or terminal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) In France, patients with advanced or terminal cancer are referred to medical institutions, palliative care units or remained at home (standard). Patients need a multidisciplinary follow-up (standard). An active participation of patients and/or their family circle is very important and physicians have to pay attention for their opinions (standard). 5) Dietetic counseling can help patients to improve their alimentation and its drawbacks (standard). 6) Palliative nutritional care often includes medicinal treatments (standard). 7) Artificial nutrition can slow down nutritional degradation, avoid dehydration and improve quality of life in patients with advanced stage cancer (especially head and neck cancer for enteral nutrition and digestive occlusions for parenteral nutrition) and unable to eat adapted meals (standard, level of evidence C). 8) When life expectancy is below 3 months with a KPS 3/4 50% (or PS > 2), artificial nutrition is not recommended (recommendation, expert agreement). 9) The assessment of nutritional care in patients with advanced or terminal cancer has to include functional scores measurement, quality of life and satisfaction degree of the patient and/or their family (standard, expert agreement).     

Standards,options and recommendations for nutritional support in bone marrow transplant patients

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French cancer centers and specialists from French public university and general hospitals and private clinics. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations, clinical practice guidelines for nutritional support in bone marrow transplant patients. Methods: Data were identified by searching Medline , web sites and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups, then submitted for review to 75 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for nutritional support in bone marrow transplant patients are: 1) Nutritional evaluation and monitoring may be proposed to bone-marrow transplant recipients (options). 2) Nutritional evaluation consists of body weight assessment and percent weight loss evaluation (standard, expert agreement). 3) Nutritional monitoring should include daily weight monitoring, clinical monitoring of hydration and assessment of daily dietary intake (standard, expert agreement). 4) Artificial nutrition is recommended in immuno-suppressed bone marrow transplant patients. This is not systematically indicated in other situation (standard). 5) Artificial nutrition, intravenous hydration and oral nutrition can be proposed to bone-marrow transplant recipients (option). 6) There is no standard modality for artificial nutrition (level of evidence B 1). Exclusive enteral or parenteral nutrition and enteral plus parenteral nutrition may be proposed to bone-marrow transplant patients (options). 7) Lipid intake representing up to 30% of the non-protein caloric intake should be supplied to patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (standard, level of evidence B1). 8) Oral supplementation with nitrogen substrates or glutamine is not recommended. Parenteral glutamine supplementation may be proposed (option).     

Practical recommendations for breathing-adapted radiotherapy]

Respiration-gated radiotherapy offers a significant potential for improvement in the irradiation of tumor sites affected by respiratory motion such as lung, breast and liver tumors. An increased conformality of irradiation fields leading to decreased complications rates of organs at risk (lung, heart...) is expected. Respiratory gating is in line with the need for improved precision required by radiotherapy techniques such as 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy. Reduction of respiratory motion can be achieved by using either breath-hold techniques or respiration synchronized gating techniques. Breath-hold techniques can be achieved with active techniques, in which airflow of the patient is temporarily blocked by a valve, or passive techniques, in which the patient voluntarily holds his/her breath. Synchronized gating techniques use external devices to predict the phase of the respiration cycle while the patient breaths freely. This work summarizes the different experiences of the centers of the STIC 2003 project. It describes the different techniques, gives an overview of the literature and proposes a practice based on our experience.     

Standards, options and recommendations (SOR) for clinical care of malignant thymoma. Groupe de Travail SOR]

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the clinical care of malignant thymoma in adult. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline (december 1998) and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to national and international independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for malignant thymoma management are that: 1) the clinical diagnosis is based on appropriate clinical and radiological findings; 2) the final diagnosis is pathological and made from a biopsy, except in cases of well-encapsulated tumors which are completely resected. The biopsy, via anterior mediastinostomy, should be performed by the surgeon who will subsequently perform the definitive surgery; 3) surgical resection must be complete including thymus and perithymic fat and performed by an experienced surgeon; 4) the therapeutic strategy for malignant thymoma is based on the three current staging systems and involves surgery with radiotherapy given if the capsule is invaded or penetrated. Radiotherapy should be given in experienced centres. Inclusion of patients in prospective clinical trials is recommended in order to determine the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and multimodality approaches; 5) treatment of metastatic malignant thymoma is based on chemotherapy. Secondary surgery may be performed with the aim of achieving complete resection. Inclusion in clinical trials is recommended; 6) at the present time, there are no clear data on which to base guidelines for timing and duration of follow-up studies in this condition. Because of late recurrence, follow-up should be long.     

Standards & options: recommendations for the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anaemic cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (2007 update)

INTRODUCTION: Beginning 1998, a working group of specialists convened by the guidelines department (Standards, Option and Recommendations: SOR) of the National French Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) published then regularly updated Recommendations relative to the use of ESA(epoetin alfa, epoetin bêta, darbepoetin) in anaemic patients with cancer. This article presents the updated Recommendations set up in 2007. METHODS: This updating process is based on the methodology developed and used in the "Standards, Options: Recommendations" programme. The methodological approach combines systematic review with the judgement of a multidisciplinary group of experts. On the basis of analysis of literature, the conclusions and their level of evidence are established. Then, the conclusions accompanied by experts' judgement lead to the Recommendations. A Recommendation is a proposal of one or several clinical attitudes intended to improve cancer patient care. Before publication, the RPC-SOR are re-examined by independent reviewers selected according to the same principles as the group of expert writers. RESULTS: New data, relative to the "use of ESA in anaemic cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy", didn't lead to update the latest Recommendations validated in 2003. However, new data relative to the "use of ESA in anaemic prophylaxis among adult patients with cancer" and to the "use of iron with ESA in cancer patients" were sufficient to generate either major or minor modifications to the initial Recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it appears relevant to re-examine these Recommendations according to a systematic monitoring process which should be renewed in two years.     

Standards, options and recommendations for the management of locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the management of locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to independent reviewers and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) The management of the locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma has two main goals: firstly to obtain local control of the disease (or to at least delay local progression in order to improve the survival or relapse free survival), and secondly to prevent the development of metastases. 2) There is a consensus that locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma should be irradiated. External beam radiotherapy should be of optimal quality and delivered at a minimal dose of 60 Gy by standard fractionation. For patients with a poor life expectancy, this can be delivered as a split-course or hypofractionated scheme. 3) Treatment for patients with a performance status of 0-1 should consist of short duration induction chemotherapy (with a least two drugs one of which must be cisplatin), combined sequentially with conventional radiotherapy. 4) Surgery is contraindicated in extensive N3 disease. Combined radio-chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) is not indicated outside clinical trials. Surgery is justified in stage N2 disease as good local control can be achieved. T4-N0 disease should be treated surgically with curative intent.     

Standards, options and recommendations (SOR) for clinical care of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Groupe de travail SOR]

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline (1991-1998) and the expert groups personal reference lists. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to national and international independent reviewers and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx management are that: 1) diagnosis and initial assessment should be based on appropriate clinical and radiological findings; 2) the therapeutic strategy is based on surgery, radiotherapy, bradytherapy and chemotherapy; 3) in limited tumours, the recommended strategy involved the use of one of these modality; 4) a multimodality approach is recommended for the treatment of extended resectable tumours. Following results of recent meta-analyses, use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. The same studies have shown that association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy either in sequence or in combination significantly improve survival of extended curable tumours. These associations are recommended within the framework of clinical trials; 5) follow-up of squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx should involve physical examination of the upper aerodigestive tract and the lymph nodes areas every three months during the first year, every six months during the second year and then every year. An annual chest x-ray is recommended. Other investigations should be performed as indicated by symptoms and clinical manifestations.     

Standards, options and recommendations (SOR) for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of osteosarcoma. Groupe de travail SOR

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. For pediatric issues, this project is a collaboration between the FNCLCC and the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP). The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for the clinical care of osteosarcoma in children and adult. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline (1985-december 1998) and the expert groups personal reference lists. The main criteria considered were incidence, risk factors, prognostic factors and efficacy of treatment. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 27 national and international independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres and, in particular, the 4 which have particular expertise in pediatric cancer management. RESULTS: The main recommendations for osteosarcoma management are that: 1) the clinical diagnosis is based on appropriate clinical and radiological findings; 2) the final diagnosis is pathological and the biopsy should be performed by the surgeon who will subsequently perform the definitive surgery; 3) surgical biopsy must be of adequate size and performed by an experienced surgeon; 4) the therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma is based on surgery with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy given in experienced centres. Inclusion of high dose methotrexate is recommended for children, and the dose of methotrexate must be adapted for adults. Inclusion of children in SFOP protocols and adults in EORTC and FNCLCC clinical trials is recommended; 5) treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma is based on chemotherapy and surgery to lung metastases which may be curative. Amputation is rarely appropriate. Inclusion of children in SFOP and of adult in EORTC and FNCLCC clinical trials for metastatic osteosarcoma is recommended; 6) at the present time, there are no clear data on which to base guidelines for timing and duration of follow-up studies in this condition.     

Future chemotherapy and radiotherapy options in head and neck cancer

Chemoradiation is a standard approach to advanced unresectable head and neck cancer, although the optimum combination regimen remains controversial. However, in the past few years, chemoradiation has been successfully extended from the treatment of unresectable disease to the postsurgical therapy of high-risk patients and its value as an organ preservation procedure is under evaluation. More recently, molecular-targeted therapies have emerged, which interfere with mechanisms of chemo- and radioresistance, and preliminary data are promising. Their use in the combined treatment of head and neck cancer will hopefully further improve the value of chemoradiation in the clinical setting.     

Standards, options and recommendations for the use of recombinant erythropoietin (epoietin alpha and beta darbepoietin-alpha, EPO) in the management of anaemia in oncology for patient undergoing radiotherapy-update 2003]

CONTEXT: "The Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the twenty French cancer centres, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To update the Standards, Options and Recommendations clinical practice guidelines for the use of recombinant erythropoietin (epoietin alpha and beta darbepoietin-alpha, EPO) in the management of anaemia in oncology for patient undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: The working group identified the questions requiring up-dating from the previous guideline. Medline and Embase were searched using specific search strategies from January 1999 to October 2002. Literature monitoring was performed to identify randomised clinical trials published between October 2002 to November 2003. In addition several Internet sites were searched in October 2002. RESULTS: There is no standard attitude for use of rHuEPO in patients undergoing radiotherapy. There is no evidence to support use of rHuEPO in patients with ENT cancer receiving radiotherapy alone. In patients undergoing curative radiotherapy, it is recommended to correct anaemia under I Og/dL using transfusion rather than rHuEPO. When the haemoglobin concentration is between 12g/dL and 14g/dL initial use of rHuEPO can be an option under certain conditions for radiochemotherapy if the risk of anaemia is high with the chemotherapy regimen used. Anaemic patients should be included in clinical trials to clarify the impact of rHuEPO in terms of local control of the tumour and survival.     

Results of radiotherapy and combined, comprehensive treatment of pancreatic cancer]

The results of irradiation, combined and complex treatment of pancreatic cancer have been evaluated versus stage, site and extent of surgery. Radiotherapy was carried out in 63 patients (1988-1999): prior to gastropancreaticoduodenectomy (GPDE)--7; after GPDE--12; for local recurrence after GPDE--4, before and after left-sided resection--4, before and after conservative surgery--19, and after diagnostic verification (exploratory laparotomy or ultrasound-controlled fine-needle biopsy)--17. Diagnosis was established on the basis of clinical data and case histories, ultrasonographic, CT, histological, cytological, biopsy, blood serum-marker CA 19-9 and CEA findings. Two months after treatment, complete remission was registered in 5 (13%), partial response--5 (13%), stabilization--13 (33%), tumor progression--16 (41%). Before and after GPDE, tolerance to radiotherapy was sufficient. Median survival in this group was 12.9 months, controls--8.1 months; for conservative surgery--7.3 and 4.1 months, respectively; radiotherapy + exploratory laparotomy alone--16.8 and 4.3 months, respectively. Irradiation of locally-advanced tumors of the body and/or tail of pancreas proved effective: median survival was 7.3 months, control--2.2 months. Hence, radiotherapy made an important contribution to treatment of locally-advanced and resectable pancreatic tumors and longer survival.     

Conformal radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer]

About one third of lung cancers initially present with a localised disease, without any curative surgery potential, because of local spread or comorbidity. Definitive radiation, alone or combined with chemotherapy, then represents the treatment of choice for these patients. The results, however, are disappointing, with a biopsy-proven local control of 10% at two years and a 5-10% five-year survival rate. These poor results may be partially explained by the difficulties in delineating the tumour volume as well as the dose limitations due to poor tolerance of surrounding normal organs. Lung parenchyma sequelae remain daily worrying events for the oncologist. The advent of 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DRT) allows progress and innovations, including the use of modern imaging techniques, sophisticated dosimetry and treatment planning, efficient immobilisation devices and on-line verification procedures. With more precise (and time-consuming) procedures, 3DRT will allow a better tumour volume delineation, an increased tumour dose and a dose limitation in normal tissues. These improvements may help increase local control and survival results. 3DRT, which has been used for several years for prostate cancer and benefits from recent imaging improvements, will now allow treatment of other locations, such as lung cancer, with conformal therapy. The few preliminary results are encouraging. This work reviews the current data and remaining questions regarding lung cancer treated with 3DRT, and presents and discusses the literature before discussing future trends in this area.     

Clinical and biological surveillance after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer]

Serum PSA is an excellent marker of disease status after external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy for patients with prostate carcinoma. A low PSA nadir < or = 1 even < or = 0.5 ng/mL has been shown to be as a surrogate end point for disease control. Three successive increases of this marker after achieving the nadir defines recurrence as recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. The biochemical relapse or PSA failure after treatment precedes clinical disease relapse by several months. PSA profile or kinetics may have implications for patterns of failure and prognosis. Prostate post-radiotherapy biopsies should not be part of routine follow-up as its interpretation is frequently problematic. Other exams should not be performed unless clinical symptoms are present. Post-radiotherapy relapse treatment has generally no curative intent.     

Targeted therapies and radiotherapy in lung cancer]

Targeted therapies are now more often used in lung cancer. Inhibitors of EGFR and of angiogenesis have demonstrated a certain activity in this disease. Some experimental in vitro or in vivo studies are in favour of combined targeted therapies and radiation. For example, additive or supra-additive effects have been shown when inhibitors of the EGFR tyrosine kinase were given with radiation. In advanced lung cancer, the combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy was demonstrated to produce better survival outcomes. But a high rate of fatal hemoptysis was reported with this drug, particularly for central and squamous tumors. This could be a limitation for its use in combination with radiation. Drugs with multiple targets are becoming available; their association with radiation seems to be promising.     

Successful treatment of recurrent kidney pelvic squamous cell cancer with chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a case report]

We report a case of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis. A 61-year-old woman was readmitted to our hospital 4 months after left nephrectomy. The medical imaging method revealed a left retroperitoneal tumor and squamous cell carcinoma related antigen (SCC-Ag) elevated (82 ng/ml). We suspected a recurrent tumor from renal pelvic cancer. She received 2 courses of systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU and CDDP, but the tumor did not change. As a second treatment, combined radiotherapy with PEP was given. The tumor was reduced and SCC-Ag returned to the normal level. The patient is alive with no recurrence or metastasis at one year following these therapies.