A systematic review of the role of hepatectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

AimThis review sought to systematically appraise the literature to establish the role of hepatectomy in treating renal cell carcinoma hepatic metastases.MethodMedline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers reporting survival of patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.ResultsSix studies containing 140 patients were included. There were no randomised controlled trials. Perioperative mortality was 4.3%, with reported morbidity between 13 and 30%. Patients with metachronous presentation, and a greater time interval between resection of primary tumour and development of metachronous metastases, appeared to have better survival. There was no difference in survival between patients with solitary and multiple metastases.ConclusionFew patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma are suitable for hepatectomy as metastatic disease is usually widespread. Selected patients may experience a survival benefit, but identifying these patients remains difficult.     

Current status of studies on targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is regarded as one of the most refractory malignancies. A further study of the molecular mechanism of RCC formation has led to a series of successful examples for treatment of patients with advanced RCC. Over the past 20 years, a nonspecific immunotherapy, with cytokines, has been employed as the gold standard for therapy of metastatic RCC. However, with scientific development and clinical testing of new drugs, targeted molecular cancer therapy has become a focus of interest. At the same time, with a better understanding of RCC,the treatment method has converged on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related molecular-targeted pathways.A large amount of research and numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of the targeted molecular therapies in patients with metastatic RCC. For example sorafenib and sunitinib were approved, in 2005 and 2006 respectively, by the U.S. FDA for treating advanced RCC. In this report, issues such as the importance of VEGF in RCC and the studies of bevacizumab,sunitinib and sorafenib in treating metastatic RCC etc., are reviewed.     

Is there a role for proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review

This paper aimed to review the literature concerning the use of proton therapy systematically in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, focusing on clinical results and technical issues. The literature search was conducted according to a specific protocol in the Medline and Scopus databases by two independent researchers covering the period of 1990–2012. Both clinical and technical studies referring to a population of patients actually treated with protons were included. The PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews were followed. A final set of 16 studies from seven proton therapy institutions worldwide were selected from an initial dataset of 324 reports. Seven clinical studies, five reports on technical issues, three studies on treatment related toxicity and one paper reporting both clinical results and toxicity analysis were retrieved. Four studies were not published as full papers. Passive scattering was the most adopted delivery technique. More than 900 patients with heterogeneous stages of disease were treated with various fractionation schedules. Only one prospective full paper was found. Local control was approximately 80% at 3–5 years, average overall survival at 5 years was 32%, with data comparable to surgery in the most favorable groups. Toxicity was low (mainly gastrointestinal). Normal liver V0_Gy < 30%_volume and V30_Gy < 18–25%_volume were suggested as cut-off values for hepatic toxicity. The good clinical results of the selected papers are counterbalanced by a low level of evidence. However, the rationale to enroll patients in prospective studies appears to be strong.     

肾细胞癌分子靶向治疗的研究进展

近年来。肾细胞癌（RCC）分子生物学研究取得了很大的进展，已确认的信号通路包括血管内皮生长因子和磷脂酰肌醇3激酶（P13K）-Akt-哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白（mTOR）通路等。RCC的靶向治疗已成为研究热点，新型靶向药物sunitinib、sorafenib、temsirolimus和bevacizumab在临床前期和临床试验中的疗效令人鼓舞.     

Optimizing treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

With the advent of targeted antiangiogenic therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the prognosis for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease has significantly improved. Indeed, the results of several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), provide superior efficacy and tolerability compared with traditional cytokine-based treatments. However, TKI therapy is still associated with significant toxicities related to off-target inhibition that are detrimental to patient quality of life. The results of ongoing head-to-head trials will determine how these agents compare with each other in terms of efficacy, and whether TKIs that interact with fewer off-target kinases have improved tolerability profiles. Furthermore, examining how these agents could be integrated with surgery to provide a multimodal approach to the treatment of metastatic RCC could further improve the outlook for RCC patients.     

Tumour shrinkage measured with first treatment evaluation under VEGF-targeted therapy as prognostic marker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

Background:

The aim of our analysis is to further characterise the prognostic relevance of early tumour shrinkage (TS) during VEGF-targeted therapy in mRCC, in order to explore whether this could define a group of patients with long-term survivorship.

Methods:

A hundred patients were stratified into five subgroups according to their change of tumour size with first treatment evaluation: −100% to −60% −59% to −30% and −29% to 0% TS or gain of tumour size from 1% to 19% and ⩾20% or occurrence of new lesions (i.e., progressive disease).

Results:

The median PFS and OS were 10.4 months and 28.2 months, respectively. The median OS stratified according to the subgroups as described above was 77.4, 33.5, 26.9, 30.0 and 14.3 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed early TS as a prognostic marker (P=0.021; HR 1.624).

Conclusion:

The extent of TS defines a small proportion of patients with an excellent prognosis. Larger studies are warranted to define the relationship of long-term survivorship and extent of TS with targeted therapies.     

Outcomes of palliative surgery for bone metastasis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy

IntroductionThe introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized treatment strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and has improved survival rates. The number of patients with bone metastases from RCC requiring surgery will increase as survival rates improve. However, there is insufficient evidence to standardize the treatment of bone metastases after the introduction of targeted therapy for metastatic RCC. We aimed to determine the outcomes of palliative surgical treatment of bone metastases in the extremities of patients with metastatic RCC.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 26 lesions from 17 patients who underwent surgery for extremity and acetabular bone metastases and were treated with targeted therapies for advanced RCC between 2008 and 2020. The median follow-up duration was 19 months (range, 4–76). We assessed the patients’ activities of daily living, quality of life, and pain and analyzed their postoperative values relative to preoperative values. Postoperative overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and the factors affecting them were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsThe 5-year OS and LPFS rates were 39.5% and 65.6%, respectively. The factors affecting OS were sex, Katagiri score, visceral metastases, and preoperative targeted therapy, while the factors affecting LPFS were pathologic fractures and surgical technique.ConclusionIn this study, the postoperative outcomes of palliative surgery for bone metastases from metastatic RCC were good. We suggest that systemic treatment should be prioritized over local control for advanced bone metastasis in RCC and surgery before pathological fracture should be performed for local control.     

MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This is a systematic review of studies investigating the prognostic value of different microRNAs (miRs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Twenty-seven relevant studies were identified, with a total of 2578 subjects. We found that elevated expression of miR-21, miR-1260b, miR-210, miR-100, miR-125b, miR-221, miR-630, and miR-497 was associated with a poor prognosis in RCC patients. Conversely, decreased expression of miR-106b, miR-99a, miR-1826, miR-215, miR-217, miR-187, miR-129–3p, miR-23b, miR-27b, and miR-126 was associated with a worse prognosis. We performed meta-analyses on studies to address the prognostic value of miR-21, miR-126, miR-210, and miR-221. This revealed that elevated miR-21 expression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28–4.08), cancer specific survival (CSS; HR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.49–6.95), and disease free survival (DFS; HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.16–3.98). The decreased expression of miR-126 was associated with shorter CSS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15–0.85), OS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30–0.69), and DFS (HR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18–0.50). Our comprehensive systematic review reveals that miRs, especially miR-21 and miR-126, could be promising prognostic markers and useful therapeutic targets in RCC.     

Hyponatremia as a prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Background:

Low serum sodium has recently been associated with poor survival in localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We now show the prognostic effect of serum sodium in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC).

Methods:

Cohort A comprised 120 consecutive patients with mRCC receiving subcutaneous, low-dose interleukin-2 and interferon-α. Hyponatremia was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. An independent cohort of another 120 patients with mRCC was used for validation (cohort B).

Results:

In cohort A, estimated 5-year survival was 15% and median survival was 15.1 months. Serum sodium ranged between 126 and 144 mM. Twenty-four patients (20%) had serum sodium levels below normal range (<136 mM). In multivariate analysis, significant independent risk factors for short survival were low serum sodium (P=0.014), high neutrophils (P=0.018), lactate dehydrogenase >1.5 upper normal level (P=0.002), and number of metastatic sites (+3) (P=0.003). In cohort B, serum sodium ranged between 128 and 146 mM. Seventeen patients (14%) had sodium levels below normal range. In multivariate analysis, serum sodium was validated as an independent prognostic factor (P=0.001). A significant association between lack of response and hyponatremia was observed in both cohorts (P=0.003 and P=0.02, respectively).

Conclusion:

Low serum sodium is a new, validated, independent prognostic, and predictive factor in patients with mRCC.     

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted agents

The medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone a paradigm shift during the last decade with the approval of five drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors (bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib and axitinib) and of two drugs inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway (temsirolimus and everolimus). Median survival has now reached 2 years in mRCC patients receiving first-line targeted treatment. A considerable body of work was conducted on the identification of prognostic factors of survival in the earlier era of immunotherapy of mRCC. The current challenge is to pursue this work on biomarkers of prognosis for targeted therapy and, even more importantly, to identify predictive factors of response to such therapy. This review provides an overview of recent key work on prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced clear cell RCC treated with VEGF-targeted agents.     

Everolimus for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to anti-VEGF therapy: Results of a pooled analysis of non-interventional studies

AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who failed one or two anti-VEGF therapies.Patients and methodsData from four prospective, non-interventional studies conducted in Germany, France, Greece and Austria were pooled for this analysis. Patients with mRCC of any histology (clear cell or non-clear cell) were included. VEGF-refractory patients received everolimus 10 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to determine everolimus efficacy as measured by time to progression (TTP; from baseline to progression).ResultsThe overall population comprised 632 patients; 493 patients received everolimus in the second-line setting. Most patients were of favourable/intermediate MSKCC risk (91%), had clear cell mRCC (89%), and had undergone nephrectomy (89%). Median TTP was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9–6.8) for the overall population and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.8–6.9) for the second-line everolimus population. Similarly, median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 5.0–6.1) for the overall population and 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.0–6.4) for second-line everolimus population. Best tumour response (n = 349) was complete or partial remission in 12% of patients and stable disease in 59% of patients. Overall population median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.0–not reached). Commonly reported adverse events (AEs) (any grade) were stomatitis (25%), anaemia (15%) and asthenia (11%).ConclusionsResults of this pooled analysis provide evidence of safety and effectiveness of second-line everolimus in routine clinical use and support everolimus as a standard of care for VEGF-refractory patients with mRCC.     

Adjuvant therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Locally advanced, non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is conventionally managed with surgery. However, patients are at a high risk of RCC recurrence and have poor survival outcomes. An effective adjuvant systemic treatment is needed to improve on these outcomes. Targeted molecular and immune-based therapies have been investigated, or are under investigation, but their role in this setting remains unclear.

Areas covered: A comprehensive search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for relevant literature. The following topics pertinent to adjuvant therapy in RCC were evaluated: strategies for patient selection, cytokine-based immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, VEGF and non-VEGF targeted molecular agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Expert commentary: Strong evidence for the incorporation of adjuvant therapy in high-risk RCC is lacking. Multiple targeted molecular therapies have been examined with only one approved for use. Genetic and molecular-based prognostic models are needed to determine who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Developing adjuvant therapy strategies in the future depends on the results of important ongoing trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents.     

Prognostic factors associated with the response to sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Objective

We investigated the prognostic clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) in the once-daily continuous administration of first-line sunitinib in a consecutive cohort of Turkish patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (rcc).

Methods

The study enrolled 77 Turkish patients with metastatic rcc who received sunitinib in a continuous once-daily dosing regimen between April 2006 and April 2011. Univariate analyses were performed using the log-rank test.

Results

Median follow-up was 18.5 months. In univariate analyses, poor pfs and os were associated with 4 of the 5 factors in the Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center (mskcc) score: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher, low hemoglobin, high corrected serum calcium, and high lactate dehydrogenase. In addition to those factors, hypoalbuminemia, more than 2 metastatic sites, liver metastasis, non–clear cell histology, and the presence of sarcomatoid features on pathology were also associated with poor pfs; and male sex, hypoalbuminemia, prior radiotherapy, more than 2 metastatic sites, lung metastasis, nuclear grade of 3 or 4 for the primary tumour, and the presence of sarcomatoid features were also associated with poorer os. The application of the mskcc model distinctly separated the pfs and os curves (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our study identified prognostic factors for pfs and os with the use sunitinib as first-line metastatic rcc therapy and confirmed that the mskcc model still appears to be valid for predicting survival in metastatic rcc in the era of molecular targeted therapy.     

Update on the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) management has undergone a paradigm shift in recent decades. The first revolution came with the emergence of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors; there was a second wave with the unprecedented success of checkpoint inhibitors, and then the latest approach, which is becoming the new care standard in mRCC, of combining these two strategies in different ways. Updated results of Checkmate-214 after 42 mo of follow-up were consistent with previously published results showing the superiority of nivolumab/ipilimumab over sunitinib in progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate and high-risk patients. However, several studies presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 suggested that the best place, and so far, the only one for nivolumab/ipilimumab is the frontline setting. The update on Keynote-426 after 23 mo of follow-up showed no superiority of pembroli-zumab/axitinib over sunitinib in favorable-risk mRCC, suggesting that it should no longer be the first line of choice in low-risk patients. Finally, the phase III Checkmate 9ER trial results revealed the superiority of nivolumab/cabozantinib vs sunitinib in PFS, OS, and ORR, providing a new first-line option among all International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk patients. Some phase II clinical trials also presented this year showed promising results with new combination therapies such as nivolumab/sitravatinib, cabozantinib/atezolizumab, and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab, providing promising grounds upon which to start phase III studies. In addition, other works are using novel therapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action, including telaglenastat (a glutaminase inhibitor), entinostat [an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs)], and olaparib and talazoparib, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors widely used in other tumors. However, some questions regarding mRCC management still need to be addressed, such as head-to-head comparisons between the current options, treatment sequencing, non-clear cell mRCC, and the role of biomarkers to ascertain the best treatment choice.     

肾透明细胞癌预后相关蛋白标志物的研究进展

肾细胞癌(renal cell carcinoma,RCC)是人类最常见的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤之一,其最常见的病理类型为肾透明细胞癌（clear cell renal cell carcinoma,ccRCC）。近年来,国内外诸多研究报道多种蛋白的表达与ccRCC的预后密切相关。本文就这些蛋白标志物在判断ccRCC患者预后方面的重要作用做一综述。     

Treatment of everolimus-resistant metastatic renal cell carcinoma with VEGF-targeted therapies

Background:

Treatment of everolimus-resistant disease remains largely undefined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We report on 40 patients (pts) who receive systemic treatment after failure of everolimus.

Patients and methods:

Forty pts received sunitinib (n=19), sorafenib (n=8), dovitinib (n=10) or bevacizumab/interferon (n=3) after failure of everolimus. Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and best tumour response (according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) were analysed retrospectively. Kaplan–Meier, log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate or predict OS and PFS.

Results:

Treatment of everolimus-resistant disease was associated with a PFS of 5.5 months. (range 0.4–22.3) and an objective partial remission (PR) in 4 pts (10%) and stable disease (SD) in 22 pts (55%). In univariate analyses, first-line treatment with sorafenib was the only variable to correlate with a prolonged PFS of treatment in everolimus-resistant disease (P=0.036). However, its significance as a predictive marker for subsequent therapy could not be verified in multivariate analyses.

Conclusions:

Vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy shows promising activity in everolimus-resistant metastatic renal cancer and warrants further studies.     

Molecularly targeted therapy in renal cell carcinoma

Recent developments in the molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma have identified multiple pathways associated with the development of this cancer. Multiple strategies have been investigated targeting these pathways, with significant clinical benefits shown in early studies. This review aims to overview the findings of recent clinical trials and clarify the development of these compounds for use in renal cell carcinoma. The authors also aim to clarify the molecular pathways implicated in renal cell carcinoma and the clinical results in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with agents targeting these pathways. The relevant literature was reviewed concerning pathways implicated in the pathophysiology of renal cell carcinoma including pathways activated secondary to von Hippel-Lindau gene inactivation and PI-3 kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway activation. Therapeutic targeting based upon underlying molecular biology in renal cell carcinoma has strong rationale. Substantial clinical activity has been reported with various agents targeting these pathways, most notably with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy. However, investigation is needed to optimally utilize these agents at the appropriate stage of disease and in the best combinations for maximal clinical benefit.     

转移性肾癌的治疗

 肾癌是泌尿生殖系统最为常见的肿瘤之一，全球肾癌发病率呈逐年上升趋势。相当一部分肾癌患者就诊时已有远处转移，其预后较差。目前尚无有效的治疗手段能明显提高转移性肾癌患者的预后。近年来肾癌治疗出现许多新的选择，就转移性肾癌的手术、免疫、化疗、放疗、抗血管内皮生长因子等治疗进展作一概述。     

Efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with renal insufficiency

BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with renal insufficiency are generally excluded from clinical trials, despite their increasing numbers. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sunitinib in such patients.Patients and methodsKorean patients with mRCC with renal insufficiency who had received sunitinib as first-line treatment between January 2008 and May 2012 were included. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and toxicities were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined according to the degree of renal impairment.ResultsThe median age of the 34 patients evaluated was 66 years, 90% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and the median glomerular filtration rate was 46.5 mL min⁻¹·1.73 m⁻² (range, 21.1–59.5). The starting sunitinib dose was 37.5 and 50 mg for 12 and 22 patients, respectively. A 4-weeks-on–2-weeks-off regimen was followed for 31 patients; a 2-weeks-on–2-weeks-off regimen, for one patient; and a daily regimen, for two patients. The best response was partial response in eight patients and stable disease in 12. Median OS and PFS times were 26.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.1–35.3) and 12.2 months (95% CI: 10.2–13.2), respectively. Common non-haematologic adverse events (AEs) were stomatitis, rash, general oedema and fatigue. The most common AEs of ⩾grade 3 severity were fatigue, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionsIn patients with mRCC with renal insufficiency, sunitinib was efficacious and did not cause increased toxicity. Thus, clinicians should not hesitate to treat patients with mRCC with renal insufficiency with sunitinib.