Bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction

The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by bundle branch block is a significant clinical problem and represents 8% to 13% of patients with acute infarction. This study reviews the records of 606 patients with myocardial infarction admitted to our coronary care unit. Forty-seven (8%) had complete bundle branch block. The risk of developing high-degree AV block in these 47 patients was reviewed. There are no established therapeutic guidelines for patients with pre-existing bundle branch block and left bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction. We found a high risk of progression in patients with pre-existing bifascicular block in the presence of anterior wall infarction (25%) as well as in patients with left bundle branch block with acute anterior wall infarction (100%). On the basis of our data and careful review of the literature, we recommend prophylactic pacemaker insertion in these high-risk groups.     

Long-term prognostic significance of atrioventricular block in inferior acute myocardial infarction

Among 477 consecutive patients admitted for inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV) block developed in 88 (20%). Compared with the 359 without AV block, these 88 patients presented a higher incidence of Killip class greater than 1 (52% vs 28%, P less than 0.001), pericarditis (30% vs 17%, P less than 0.01), atrial fibrillation (26% vs 11%, P less than 0.01), complete bundle branch block (12% vs 4%, P less than 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (24% vs 4%, P less than 0.001). The 3-year post-hospital mortality was not significantly different in the two groups (12% vs 15%). Among the 88 patients with AV block, those who died at hospital were older (66 +/- 11 vs 59 +/- 11 years, P less than 0.05), had a higher incidence of Killip class greater than 1 (86% vs 42%, P less than 0.001) and bundle branch block (29% vs 7%, P less than 0.05). Thus, patients with inferior AMI who developed AV block had a poor hospital outcome but long-term prognosis was similar in hospital survivors who had AV block and in those without this complication.     

Bundle branch block in acute Q wave inferior wall myocardial infarction: A high risk subgroup of inferior myocardial infarction patients

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and impactof right and left bundle branch block on the in-hospital, 5-yearand 10-year mortality of patients with acute inferior Q wavemyocardial infarction. A retrospective analysis of clinicalcharacteristics, hospital, 1-, 5-, and 10-year mortality of2215 consecutive patients with acute inferior Q wave myocardialinfarction hospitalized in 13 coronary care units in Israelwas performed Bundle branch block during acute Q wave inferior wall myocardialinfarction was present in 108 patients (4.9%), 85 of whom hadright and 23 left bundle branch block. Patients with bundlebranch block had more in-hospital complications than those without,irrespective of the site and time of appearance of the block.In addition, a trial fibrillation (19%), complete atrioventricularblock (21%) and congestive heart failure (45%) appeared morefrequently in patients with, than in those without, bundle branchblock (11%, 9% and 31%, respectively), and in-hospital and 5-yearmortality were higher in patients with the block (22%, 33%)than in those without it (13% and 23%, respectively). Bundle branch block emerged as an independent predictor of deathonly among patients with new right bundle branch block, andright bundle branch block emerged as an independent predictorfor the development of complete atrioventricular block (oddsratio 2.13; 90% confidence interval 1.39–3.28). However,hospital mortality among patients with inferior myocardial infarctionand complete atrioventricular block was virtually independentof bundle branch block (39% with vs 36% without bundle branchblock, respectively). Patients with inferior Q wave myocardial infarction and bundlebranch block comprise a high risk subgroup of patients witha complicated hospital course and increased hospital and long-termmortality.     

Alternating and intermittent bilateral bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarct with development of total atrioventricular block]

The development of bilateral bundle branch block of various degree in the course of an acute myocardial infarction was demonstrated in a 74-year-old man during continuous ecg-monitoring. Initially there was a tachycardia- and bradycardia-dependent left bundle branch block, followed by a right bundle branch block with second degree type II AV block (Mobitz), and finally complete bilateral bundle branch block with asystole. Different combinations of incomplete block were shown and the presence of type I and type II second degree block within the bundle branches could be demonstrated; Wenckebach periods became indirectly visualized through changes in the AV conduction. This case illustrates the prognostic importance of progressive intraventricular conduction disturbance and reveals the multiplicity and possible mechanisms of conduction defects within the bundle branches.     

Influence of right bundle branch block on short- and long-term survival after acute anterior myocardial infarction

The impact of right bundle branch block on long-term prognosis after anterior wall myocardial infarction is unclear. In 932 patients with Q wave anterior infarction, the short- and long-term prognostic significance of the presence of right bundle branch block was analyzed. Compared with 754 patients without block, 178 patients with right bundle branch block after myocardial infarction showed an increased incidence of left ventricular failure (72% versus 52%, p less than 0.001) and increased in-hospital (32% versus 8%, p less than 0.001) and 1 year after hospital discharge (17% versus 7%, p less than 0.001) cardiac mortality rates. The presence of right bundle branch block was an independent predictor of increased in-hospital and 1-year mortality when entered in a multivariate analysis. However, the absence of left ventricular failure identified a subgroup of patients with right bundle branch block with low in-hospital (4%) and 1 year postdischarge (5%) cardiac mortality rates comparable with those of patients with neither failure nor right bundle branch block (1.7% and 4.8%, respectively). In the presence of left ventricular failure, patients with associated right bundle branch block had higher in-hospital (43% versus 14%, p less than 0.01) and 1 year postdischarge (24% versus 9%, p less than 0.01) cardiac mortality rates than those of patients with failure but no right bundle branch block. Thus, the presence of right bundle branch block after anterior myocardial infarction is an independent marker of poor prognosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Conduction disorders after cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation

Two-hundred-fifty-eight patients who had cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation were studied to determine the frequency and significance of conduction disturbances. Fifty-eight (34%) developed new postoperative conduction defects. Seventeen patients developed new conduction alterations after coronary artery bypass graft. The most common disturbance was transient bifascicular block (right bundle branch block and anterior subdivision block of the left bundle branch of His) (p less than 0.01). After valvular surgery twenty-one patients developed conduction defects. Of those the most common disturbance was high degree AV block (57%). The authors found no relation between the AV block and the number of valves operated on or type of valvular surgery. After congenital heart surgery, twenty patients developed conduction defects. The most common defect was high degree AV block. The frequency of complete heart block was higher after the closure of atrial septal defects (P less than 0.01). None of the conduction defects were related to the amount of time the patient was exposed to extracorporeal circulation or to postoperative myocardial infarction. All conduction defects were transient except complete heart block in some patients with ventricular septal defect surgery. In this study there were no hemodynamic complications or mortality associated with the conduction disturbances.     

Left bundle branch block: a continuously evolving concept

Eppinger and Rothberger in 1909 and 1910 first acknowledged the importance of the conduction system, yet a confusion of the pattern of left bundle branch block with right bundle branch block resulted which persisted for 25 years. In left bundle branch block, right ventricular endocardial activation begins before, and is often completed before, initiation of left ventricular endocardial activation. Most likely, right to left septal activation then follows, resulting in left ventricular endocardial activation. Although it is hazardous to make definitive diagnoses of infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block, clues do exist. Benign left bundle branch block is rare; usually disease becomes manifest. Electrocardiographic criteria of hypertrophy are not as helpful in older patients with chronic left bundle branch block (mainly because of the very high incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy) as in younger patients with block of nonatherosclerotic origin. Left bundle branch block is often associated with other abnormalities of the conduction system. Fascicular blocks may mask or mimic myocardial infarction. Left posterior fascicular block is most often an indicator of left ventricular myocardial deficit if right ventricular enlargement is eliminated. Mortality is higher in patients with associated left axis deviation than in those with a normal axis, although the incidence of progression of atrioventricular (AV) block is low. In symptomatic patients with prolonged His to ventricular intervals, the incidence of progression of AV block is higher (12%). Preexisting left bundle branch block in the absence of clinical evidence of heart disease is rare, yet carries with it a slightly increased mortality. Newly acquired left bundle branch block carries a 10-fold increase in mortality; the incidence of sudden death as the first manifestation of heart disease is increased 10-fold.     

Mechanism and significance of widened QRS complexes during complete atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction

Twelve of 35 consecutive patients admitted with complete, atrioventricular (A-V) block complicating acute inferior myocardial infarction manifested widened QRS complexes. The escape beats had the pattern of left bundle branch block in four patients, right bundle branch block in five patients and both left and right bundle branch block in three patients.

His bundle recordings in five patients with escape beats that had a left bundle branch block configuration revealed a His bundle potential preceding the widened QRS complex at His-V intervals of 45 to 60 msec. Bradycardia-dependent left bundle branch block was demonstrated in two patients by His bundle pacing. In three patients the conducted beats had a left bundle branch block configuration after critical lengthening of the R-R interval during second degree A-V block before or after the episode of complete A-V block. In six patients whose escape beats had a right bundle branch block configuration, His bundle recordings did not reveal a His bundle potential preceding these beats.

Our observations suggest that widened QRS complexes with a left bundle branch block configuration could be due to an A-V junctional escape rhythm with phase 4 left bundle branch block. Alternatively in association with a right bundle branch block configuration it is possible that the widened QRS complexes represent a ventricular or fascicular escape rhythm.

Two of 12 patients with widened QRS complexes died. There were no significant differences in immediate mortality, 6 month mortality or mean peak serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) values between patients with narrow and widened QRS complexes. This finding suggests that widened QRS complexes during complete A-V block in acute inferior myocardial infarction have no prognostic significance.     

Incidence and predictors of atrioventricular conduction impairment after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Atrioventricular (AV) conduction impairment is well described after surgical aortic valve replacement, but little is known in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed AV conduction and need for a permanent pacemaker in patients undergoing TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System (MCRS) or the Edwards Sapien Valve (ESV). Sixty-seven patients without pre-existing permanent pacemaker were included in the study. Forty-one patients (61%) and 26 patients (39%) underwent successful TAVI with the MCRS and ESV, respectively. Complete AV block occurred in 15 patients (22%), second-degree AV block in 4 (6%), and new left bundle branch block in 15 (22%), respectively. A permanent pacemaker was implanted in 23 patients (34%). Overall PR interval and QRS width increased significantly after the procedure (p <0.001 for the 2 comparisons). Implantation of the MCRS compared to the ESV resulted in a trend toward a higher rate of new left bundle branch block and complete AV block (29% vs 12%, p = 0.09 for the 2 comparisons). During follow-up, complete AV block resolved in 64% of patients. In multivariable regression analysis pre-existing right bundle branch block was the only independent predictor of complete AV block after TAVI (relative risk 7.3, 95% confidence interval 2.4 to 22.2). In conclusion, TAVI is associated with impairment of AV conduction in a considerable portion of patients, patients with pre-existing right bundle branch block are at increased risk of complete AV block, and complete AV block resolves over time in most patients.     

Right ventricular apical activation times in patients with conduction disturbances occurring during acute transmural myocardial infarction.

His bundle and right ventricular apical electrograms were recorded in 18 patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction in whom catheter insertion was considered necessary for clinical reasons. The V-RVA and H-V intervals were of normal duration (5 to 30 and 35 to 55 msec, respectively) in five patients (Group 1) with persistently narrow (less than 100 msec) QRS complexes. In contrast, 13 patients (Group 2) who manifested a "complete" right bundle branch block pattern within 96 hours after admission had prolonged V-RVA intervals (range 50 to 80 msec, mean 59.2 msec) and H-V intervals that were at the upper limits of normal or prolonged (range 55 to 90 msec, mean 63 msec). In 6 of these 13 patients, the duration of the V-RVA interval became normal when the "complete" right bundle branch block pattern disappeared and was replaced by a "complete" left bundle branch block pattern in three patients and by narrow QRS complexes in the three other patients. This study showed that transmural myocardial infarction in itself did not increase the duration of the V-RVA interval even when "complete" left bundle branch block was present. Moreover, a prolonged V-RVA interval coexsting with a "complete" right bundle branch block pattern was not due to distal right bundle branch block but resulted from a conduction disturbance located in the proximal portions of the right bundle, or perhaps, even within the His bundle itself.     

A quantitative histopathological study of right bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether necrosis of the right bundle branch is responsible for development of right bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction. Twenty patients with acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction were studied--10 with right bundle branch block (group A) and 10 without (group B)--to evaluate by serial sectioning the pathological extent of myocardial infarction surrounding the right bundle branch and also that of right bundle branch necrosis. Myocardial infarction reached the right bundle branch more than 8 mm above the moderator band in all of group A, whereas myocardial infarction reached the right bundle branch less than 3 mm above the moderator band in only three patients in group B. Nine hearts in group A showed significant necrosis of the right bundle branch. In group B and in one case with transient right bundle branch block no necrosis was found. The occurrence of right bundle branch block was almost entirely explained by necrosis of the right bundle branch, but transient right bundle branch block did develop without necrosis of the right bundle branch.     

A quantitative histopathological study of right bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether necrosis of the right bundle branch is responsible for development of right bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction. Twenty patients with acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction were studied--10 with right bundle branch block (group A) and 10 without (group B)--to evaluate by serial sectioning the pathological extent of myocardial infarction surrounding the right bundle branch and also that of right bundle branch necrosis. Myocardial infarction reached the right bundle branch more than 8 mm above the moderator band in all of group A, whereas myocardial infarction reached the right bundle branch less than 3 mm above the moderator band in only three patients in group B. Nine hearts in group A showed significant necrosis of the right bundle branch. In group B and in one case with transient right bundle branch block no necrosis was found. The occurrence of right bundle branch block was almost entirely explained by necrosis of the right bundle branch, but transient right bundle branch block did develop without necrosis of the right bundle branch.     

An autopsy case of rheumatoid arthritis with an involvement of the cardiac conduction system

A case of rheumatoid arthritis with an involvement of the cardiac conduction system was described. The patient was a 65-year-old man who had a 15-year history of classical rheumatoid arthritis combined with an advanced atrioventricular (AV) block resulting in Adams-Stokes seizure. Prior to the occurrence of the AV block, a complete right bundle branch block with a left axis deviation and a first-degree AV block were found on an electrocardiogram (ECG). The histological examination of the conduction system according to the serial sectioning method disclosed that the branching portion of the His bundle and anterior fascicle of the left bundle branch were replaced by the scarring tissue and that the penetrating portion of the His bundle, the AV node and the right bundle branch had rheumatoid granulomatous lesions. The extent and localization of the lesions in the conduction system were well correlated with the findings on the ECG.     

QRS Alternans with 2:1 Atrioventricular Conduction Block: What Is the Mechanism?

An 81‐year‐old woman was admitted for symptomatic bradycardia. On admission, the ECG exhibited QRS alternans, narrow QRS complex and left bundle branch block with 2:1 AV block. The patient soon had complete AV block and underwent a pacemaker implantation. An appropriate mechanism for explaining those ECG findings might be 4:1 conduction over the left bundle branch and 2:1 conduction over the right bundle branch. An ECG pattern exhibiting QRS alternans with a narrow QRS complex and bundle branch block with 2:1 AV block may suggest the coexistence of both bundle branch blocks and a high risk of complete AV block.     

The incidence, clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of a left bundle-branch block associated with an acute myocardial infarct

To assess the current incidence and meaning of left bundle-branch block associated with acute myocardial infarction we studied 1,239 patients consecutively admitted in three hospitals. Left bundle branch block was present in 42 cases (3.3%). Compared to the patients without left bundle-branch block, those with left bundle-branch block were older (70 +/- 8.8 versus 63.9 +/- 11.4 years; p < 0.001), and had a more prevalent history of diabetes, angina, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Left bundle-branch block was associated more frequently with female gender and poor left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with left bundle branch block were admitted with a longer interval from the onset of the symptoms (7.8 +/- 6.3 versus 5.4 +/- 6.7 hours; p < 0.01) and received in a lesser rate thrombolytics agents (21% versus 56%; p < 0.001), than those without left bundle-branch block. Complications significatively associated with left bundle-branch block were: complete AV block; heart failure and one-year mortality (40.4% versus 19.5%, p < 0.01). Female gender, age and heart failure were independent predictors of mortality whereas left bundle-branch block was not. In conclusion, current incidence of left bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction is lower than that referred in the pre-thrombolytic era. Left bundle-branch block is accompanied by a low rate of thrombolysis, whereas a higher mortality rate of these patients seems to depend on their clinical characteristics.     

Bundle branch block and sudden death

It is clear from the available data that the prognosis for patients with chronic BBB depends to a large extent on the presence and etiology, as well as the severity, of the associated heart disease. In most patients, the terminal event is usually one of heart failure or the complication of coronary artery disease. In the absence of clinically detectable heart disease, the long-term prognosis for this group of patients is good.Patients with chronic bundle branch block Have been shown to have an incidence of ventricular arrhythmias greater than that found in a normal population. The mechanism of sudden death in any single unmonitored patient is speculative. Most patients dying suddenly, especially those with coronary artery disease, probably do so from ventricular fibrillation. Patients with documented transient high-degree AV block are at a substantial risk of sudden death.No clinical variable (such as age, syncope, angina, shortness of breath), or physical finding (such as S₃ gallop, cardiomegaly, heart failure), or electrocardiographic finding (such as RBBB with LAD, RBBB with RAD, P-R interval prolongation), or electrophysiologic variable (such as A-H or H-V interval prolongation) is useful in predicting progression to complete heart block. All the above variables occur frequently in patients with BBB and yet the progression to CHB is relatively infrequent. One might single out His-Purkinje block with normal AV nodal conduction during atrial pacing as a possible marker for development of complete heart block. However, the opposite, namely a normal H-V interval, does not rule out progression to complete heart block.The data available on the use of pacing in patients with unexplained recurrent syncope or dizziness suggests that this approach is reasonable provided an effort has been made to exclude noncardiac cause for the symptoms. Some suggest that documentation of bradyarrhythmia or measurement of H-V interval is essential prior to institution of pacing. Further studies are needed to clarify this point.BBB complicating acute myocardial infarction places the individual at significant risk of developing congestive heart failure, with mortality usually secondary to myocardial failure or refractory ventricular arrhythmias. The pressence of high-degree AV block per se does appear to increase the mortality in patients without pump failure. Recent data suggest that immediate survival may be enhanced by prophylactic pacing in patients at high risk for abrupt complete heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction, but who do not manifest evidence of heart failure. The assumption that prophylactic pacing will improve survival of patients with bundle branch block and significant heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction is purely speculative.Insufficient and conflicting data prevent a definitive statement regarding the usefulness of the P-R and H-V intervals as guidelines for the management of patients with recent-onset bundle branch block and acute myocardial infarction.Permanent pacing appears to benefit survivors of acute myocardial infarction complicated by BBB and transient high-degree AV block. However, the evidence is far from convincing.Little information is available on the influence of antiarrhythmic therapy on sudden death in patients with BBB. All currently used antiarrhythmic agents have a potentially high risk when administered to patients with BBB. Since there is no convincing prospective study as to the efficacy of drugs in preventing sudden death in patients with BBB, drug selection and its use in this group of patients remains at the discretion of the individual physician. It is based on the individual physician's experience with the drug in question and his perception of the benefit-to-risk ratio of the agent to be used.     

Electrophysiologic and pharmacologic studies in a patient with acute myocardial infarction complicated by intraventricular and atrioventricular block.

A patient with an acute anterior wall myocardial infarction complicated by bilateral bundle branch block and paroxysmal AV block is presented. The following new, uncommon or unreported phenomena were documented: the simultaneous occurrence of phase-3 block in the right bundle branch and phase-4 block in the left bundle branch; the simultaneous occurrence of phase-4 block in both main bundle branches; phase-4 left posterior hemiblock associated with escape beats arising from the injured posterior division of the left bundle branch; supernormal conduction in the right bundle branck and 2:1 right bundle branch block related to supernormality. Most of these changes were, of course, not simultaneous, and their successive appearance was related to day-to-day and sometimes hour-to-hour variations in the degree and quality of the multifascicular injury caused by the infarct. In addition, the actions of several drugs upon automaticity and conduction were tested. The effects of amiodarone, lidocaine and isoproterenol were similar to those previously reported under comparable circumstances. At a moment when the patient had repeated episodes of paroxysmal AV block with severe Adams-Stokes seizures, the administration of a single i.v. dose of 0.25 mg of strophanthin suppressed totally the Adams-Stokes attacks through a significant enhancement of ventricular automaticity. If rapid implantation of an artifical pacemaker is not at hand, strophanthin may be life-saving in patients with acute paroxysmal AV block.     

Permanent pacing in patients with transient trifascicular block during acute myocardial infarction

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and transient complete atrioventricular (A-V) block in association with right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock have a high incidence rate of late sudden death presumably due to recurrent A-V block. Over a 5 year period, 18 patients demonstrated right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock and had transient complete block during an acute myocardial infarction and survived to hospital discharge. Of six patients who did not have permanent pacing, five died suddenly (one was lost to follow-up) with a mean survival time of 2.4 months after hospital discharge. Twelve subsequent patients received permanent demand pacemakers and had a significantly improved prognosis with a mean survival time of 18 months (P < 0.001). Six patients were still alive at an average follow-up time of 20 months. Prophylactic permanent pacing significantly improves the prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in this select subgroup of patients.     

ECG criteria in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block is difficult. Recently a diagnostic ECG scoring system was suggested, showing good diagnostic abilities. This scoring system has never been tested in a prospective manner; we have done so and investigated if it might bear prognostic information. METHODS: A prospective multi-centre study. Consecutive patients with left bundle branch block and suspicion of acute myocardial infarction, admitted to 14 Swedish coronary care units. Recruitment from March 1996 to December 1997. ECG registered on admission and after 12-24 h. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included, mean age 74.9 years. Seventy-six patients (48%) had an acute myocardial infarction. The proposed cut-off total score of > or = 3 of the ECG scoring system for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction had a sensitivity of 17.1% (95% CI 8.6-25.6%) and specificity of 94.0% (95% CI 88.9-99.1%). Clinical judgement of acute myocardial infarction resulted in a sensitivity of 15.8% (95% CI 7.6-24%) and specificity of 96.0% (CI 92.3-100%). No difference was seen in 3-month or 1-year survival between those with total ECG score > or = 3 versus total score < 3. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic abilities of the proposed ECG criteria are low and not better than the clinical judgement. The criteria are therefore not suitable for screening patients with suspicion of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block, nor do they seem to identify high risk patients.     

The fate of patients with intraventricular conduction disturbances complicating acute myocardial infarction.

The partial incidence and the early and late mortality were studied in 104 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by intraventricular conduction defects. Right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock had a greater incidence than the other conduction anomalies, while the hospital mortality was greater for the complete right bundle branch block combined with left anterior or posterior hemiblock, followed in order by complete left bundle branch block. Late morality was higher in cases with complete right bundle branch block combined with left posterior hemiblock and also in cases with focal block or left bundle branch block indicating a poor prognosis for these patients. For the rest sub-groups of patients late mortality was relatively low indicating the possibility of long survival after passing the acute phase. However, longer periods of observation are desirable for further estimation of their ultimate prognosis.