口服伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍疗效和安全性的临床研究

目的 :评价伐地那非对男性勃起功能障碍 (ED)患者的疗效和安全性。　方法 :应用随机、双盲、安慰剂平行对照、剂量固定 (5、1 0和 2 0mg)方法 ,对 88例ED患者进行 1 2周的临床研究。　结果 :5、1 0和 2 0mg伐地那非使ED患者达到和维持勃起的临床主要和次要指标均明显高于安慰剂 (P <0 .0 1 ) ;伐地那非各剂量组不良事件发生率高于安慰剂组 ,均为轻至中度 ,呈一过性。　结论 :伐地那非是治疗各种病因导致ED的安全、有效的药物。     

盐酸伐地那非治疗男性勃起功能障碍临床研究

目的 观察盐酸伐地那非治疗男性勃起功能障碍的安全性和有效性。方法 随机、双盲、安慰剂对照，对88例勃起功能障碍口服伐地那非治疗的患者进行了为期7个月的观察随访。结果 主要疗效指标的统计学分析结果，显示出5mg、10mg和20mg三个剂量组的伐地那非疗效均优于安慰剂组。次要疗效指标的分析结果与主要疗效指标一致。与药物相关的不良事件依次为潮红、头痛、眼胀、鼻塞、头晕和背痛，多为轻度，且可以自行缓解。结论 盐酸伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍安全、有效、耐受性好。     

他达拉非、西地那非和伐地那非治疗6个月后的疗效和患者满意度：勃起功能障碍观察性研究（EDOS）

EDOS是一项在全欧开展，旨在评估勃起功能障碍（ED）男性患者在实际临床中接受6个月他达拉非、枸橼酸西地那非（西地那非）或盐酸伐地那非（伐地那非）治疗后健康状况的研究。研究中药物的疗效和患者满意度的评估指标为一些已经得到确认的问卷，如全球评估问卷（GAQ）、国际勃起功能指数（IIEF）、     

伐地那非在肾移植伴勃起功能障碍患者中应用的有效性和安全性研究

目的:评估伐地那非在肾移植后伴阴茎勃起功能障碍(ED)患者中应用的有效性和安全性。方法:选取39例血浆肌酐值<2mg/dl的肾移植伴有ED患者进行为期4周随机、双盲的伐地那非研究,实验组20例,安慰剂组19例。应用勃起功能国际指数(IIEF)进行伐地那非有效性的评估;应用血清肌酐值,肌酐清除率和血液中免疫抑制剂环孢素浓度监测值评估伐地那非的安全性。结果:应用伐地那非治疗的ED患者评分从12.6±3.4改善到26.5±2.8(P<0.01)。肾功能和环孢素浓度在伐地那非治疗前后没有改变。有4例伐地那非组患者观察到不良反应,2例出现头痛,1例出现心悸伴颜面潮红,还有1例出现消化不良。结论:本研究证实伐地那非对肾移植伴ED患者勃起功能改善有效而且安全。     

磷酸二酯酶（PDEs）治疗勃起功能障碍的有效性研究

BernerMM等人进行了一项研究。本项元分析旨在通过国际勃起功能指数（IIEF），评估目前3种PDE-5抑制剂（西地那非、他达拉非和伐地那非）在使用最大固定剂量时对勃起功能障碍（ED）的改善程度。本研究通过对MEDLINE和Cochrane Library电子数据库的检索，寻找PDE5抑制剂治疗ED的有效性临床研究，亦通过相关药物制造厂家，以得到未发表的或未正式记录的会议录。     

夜间阴茎勃起作为衡量优化剂量的5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂长期服用治疗勃起功能障碍的依据

每晚服用一个灵活剂量的5型磷酸二酯酶（PDE5）的抑制剂西地那非（25、50、100mg），或伐地那非（5、10、25mg），连续服用1年，分析夜间阴茎勃起及坚挺次数（nptr，rigiscan）的结果，检验PDE5抑制剂是否可以改善轻中度动脉性勃起功能障碍（ED）男子的自发性勃起功能。MathersMJ等人进行了一项研究，将每晚服用西地那非的患者与基于每日固定剂量的西地那非25mg或伐地那非5mg的患者进行对照。     

伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍的多中心、随机、双盲、对照研究

目的　观察伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍的安全性和有效性。　方法　采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的方法 ,在国内 7家中心对 6 2 4例勃起功能障碍者口服伐地那非的勃起功能改善情况进行临床观察。患者随机按 1∶1∶1∶1进入安慰剂组及伐地那非 5、10、2 0mg组 ,每组各 15 6例 ,完成 4周洗脱期和 12周治疗期。患者按需在性交前 1h服用 1片研究药物。每日最多服用 1次研究药物。观察治疗 12周后国际勃起功能指数 (IIEF)问卷中有关勃起功能部分 (问题 1～ 5和 15 )的得分 ,患者日记中有关插入的成功率及成功保持勃起的成功率。　结果　共有 6 0 2例 (96 .5 % )进入安全性评估和意向性分析 ,各组分别为安慰剂组 14 8例 (94 .9% )、5mg组 15 1例 (96 .8% )、10mg组 15 0例 (96 .2 % )、2 0mg组 15 3例 (98.1% )。完全符合方案人群共 4 6 8例 (75 .0 % ) ,各组分别为 :安慰剂组 12 0例 (76 .9% )、5mg组 118例 (75 .6 % )、10mg组 10 6例 (6 8.0 % )、2 0mg组 12 4例 (79.5 % )。意向性分析人群的IIEF勃起功能部分 (问题 1～ 5 ,15 )得分的统计结果 ,用药 12周后 ,伐地那非 5mg组、10mg组和 2 0mg组的平均得分基线分别为 13.3分、14 .1分和 13.6分 ,分别增加到 2 2 .2分、2 2 .8分和 2 3.6分 ,与安慰剂组     

舍曲林和伐地那非治疗合并勃起功能障碍的早泄患者的临床观察

目的:评价舍曲林和伐地那非治疗合并勃起功能障碍(ED)的早泄患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法:60例诊断为合并ED的早泄患者随机分为舍曲林组和伐地那非组,每组30例。舍曲林组每天服用舍曲林50 mg,疗程2个月。伐地那非组每次性生活前服用伐地那非10~20 mg,疗程2个月。以治疗前后IIEF-5评分的改变来评价ED治疗效果,以治疗前后阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)的变化来评价早泄治疗效果。结果:伐地那非组勃起功能改善24例,有效率为80%;而舍曲林组仅8例勃起功能改善,有效率为27%,两者差异有显著性(P<0.05)。伐地那非组早泄改善20例,有效率为67%;而舍曲林组早泄改善12例,有效率为40%,两者差异有显著性(P<0.05)。两组患者中,勃起功能改善者的早泄治疗的有效率均显著高于勃起功能无改善者。两组的不良反应均为轻度,无停药者。结论:对合并ED的早泄患者,改善患者的勃起功能是关键。     

伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍的有效性和安全性

伐地那非是一种有效的、高选择性的口服磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂。它对各种病因、各种程度、各年龄段的男性勃起功能障碍(ED)患者均有良好疗效，可显著改善勃起功能。该药口服后最快10min即可起效，长期使用仍能保持疗效，不良反应少，耐受性好。因此，伐地那非是治疗男性ED患者的有效、安全的药物。     

伐地那非治疗勃起功能障碍的有效性和安全性

伐地那非是一种有效的、高选择性的口服磷酸二酯酶 (PDE5 )抑制剂。它对各种病因、各种程度、各年龄段的男性勃起功能障碍 (ED)患者均有良好疗效 ,可显著改善勃起功能。该药口服后最快 10min即可起效 ,长期使用仍能保持疗效 ,不良反应少 ,耐受性好。因此 ,伐地那非是治疗男性ED患者的有效、安全的药物。     

Efficacy and treatment satisfaction with on-demand tadalafil (Cialis) in men with erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: Tadalafil (Cialis) is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, which mediates relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in the corpus cavernosum thus facilitating erection. The purpose of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate efficacy and treatment satisfaction of on-demand Cialis in men with mild-to-severe erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Following a 4-week treatment-free run in period, patients stratified into three severity groups by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) domain score were randomized to receive either placebo or Cialis 20 mg taken on demand over a 12-week period. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in IIEF EF domain scores, responses to Sexual Encounter Profile diary (SEP) questions, and responses to the Global Assessment Questions (GAQ). Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire in two of seven participating countries where validated translations were available. RESULTS: Of the 443 men who entered the trial, 409 (mean age, 52 years) formed the intent-to-treat population. Mean baseline demographics and ED severity measures were balanced between treatment groups except for a higher percentage of patients na?ve to sildenafil in the tadalafil group compared to placebo (50% versus 36%). The percentage of patients in each IIEF EF severity class (mild, moderate and severe) was 47%, 30% and 23% for placebo patients and 48%, 29% and 23% for tadalafil patients, respectively. Tadalafil was significantly superior to placebo on all primary efficacy measures (IIEF EF domain scores, SEP15, GAQ1; p < 0.001); notably 64% of tadalafil patients achieved a normal IIEF EF domain score at endpoint compared to 16% of placebo patients (p < 0.001). Of the 185 patients completing the EDITS questionnaire (137 receiving Cialis and 48 receiving placebo), tadalafil-treated patients had a median EDITS score of 84 (95%CI 80, 86), which was significantly higher than the median score for placebo-treated patients of 41 (95%CI 32, 59; p < 0.001; Wilcoxon test). The proportion of patients satisfied with treatment (defined as final EDITS score greater than 50) was 87% for the tadalafil-treated group and 46% for the placebo-treated group (p < 0.001; exact test). Adverse events were significantly more common with tadalafil than placebo (p < 0.01) and included primarily headache (7.2% versus 1.9%) and flushing (4.6% versus 0%). One patient discontinued tadalafil treatment due to back pain. CONCLUSION: In men with mild-to-severe ED, tadalafil 20 mg significantly improves erectile function, demonstrates superior treatment satisfaction relative to placebo, and is well tolerated. This is the first study to yield efficacy data on tadalafil in an Eastern European population of men with erectile dysfunction, and the first to measure satisfaction with the EDITS questionnaire in any study population of men with this condition using tadalafil.     

Vardenafil 20-mg demonstrated superior efficacy to 10-mg in Japanese men with diabetes mellitus suffering from erectile dysfunction

AIM: Vardenafil is a highly selective and potent phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy of vardenafil has been demonstrated in a broad range of ED populations, but has not yet been assessed in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), although DM is frequently associated with difficult-to-treat ED. This is the first study to investigate whether high-dose vardenafil (20 mg) can demonstrate superior efficacy to the usual dose (10 mg) in this subpopulation in Japan. METHODS: The study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre, parallel group comparison 12-week study. Following 4 weeks observation period, 778 patients aged 26-64 years old with ED and DM (HbA1c >12% at screening was excluded) both of more than 3 years duration were randomly allocated to one of the three groups, vardenafil 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo (randomization ratio 3:3:1). Erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function was estimated as the primary efficacy parameter. RESULTS: Vardenafil 10 and 20 mg both significantly improved the EF domain score from 13.6 and 13.9 at baseline to 21.8 and 22.9 at last observation carried forward (LOCF), respectively, compared to placebo (13.7 at baseline to 16.3 at LOCF; p<0.0001). In addition, vardenafil 20 mg demonstrated superior efficacy to 10 mg (p<0.05), and the difference was more evident in severe ED patients (baseline EF domain score <11). The safety profile was comparable between these two doses (drug-related adverse events: 6.6, 22.0 and 24.2% in placebo, vardenafil 10 mg, and 20 mg arms, respectively). The most common adverse events were hot flush, headache and nasal congestion, which were mild in intensity and transient, and are known to be common to PDE5 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: In Japanese men with DM and ED, vardenafil 10 mg and 20 mg were effective in improving erectile function with comparable safety profiles. Vardenafil 20 mg demonstrated superior efficacy compared with 10 mg, suggesting incremental clinical benefit in using the higher dose in this difficult-to-treat population.     

Erectile response with vardenafil in sildenafil nonresponders: a multicentre, double-blind, 12-week, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled erectile dysfunction clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of vardenafil in patients previously unresponsive to sildenafil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre, double-blind, 12-week, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled trial was conducted, involving 463 men aged > or = 18 years with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction (ED) and who were unresponsive to sildenafil (by history). After a 4-week treatment-free run-in, patients received placebo or vardenafil 10 mg with the option to maintain current dose or to titrate by one dose level (5, 10 or 20 mg) based on efficacy and tolerability at 4 and 8 weeks. Outcome measures were the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function, two Sexual Encounter Profile diary questions (vaginal penetration and maintenance of erection until successful completion of intercourse), and the Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: There was significantly better EF with vardenafil than with placebo throughout the study. The least-square mean EF domain scores increased from 9.3 at baseline to 17.6 at the 'last' observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis with vardenafil (P < 0.001). Overall least-square mean per-patient success rates more than doubled for penetration (30.3% to 62.3%) and quadrupled for successful intercourse (10.5% to 46.1%) with vardenafil. Improved erections (positive response to the GAQ) were reported by 61.8% of patients receiving vardenafil and 14.7% of those receiving placebo at LOCF (P < 0.001). Normal EF (domain score > or = 26) was achieved by 30% of patients receiving vardenafil and 6% receiving placebo at LOCF (P < 0.001). Adverse events were infrequent and representative of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor profile. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil is an effective and generally safe treatment for ED, even in men unresponsive to sildenafil (by history).     

The efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil, a new, oral, selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction: the first at-home clinical trial

Vardenafil, a novel selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, was evaluated in its first large-scale at-home trial. A total of 601 men with mild to severe erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled in this multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 12 weeks of treatment with either placebo or 5, 10 and 20 mg of vardenafil. Primary endpoints were Q3 (vaginal penetration) and Q4 (maintenance of erection) of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). In the intent-to-treat population (n=580), the changes from baseline for 5, 10 and 20 mg vardenafil (1.2, 1.3 and 1.5, respectively) were all improved (P<0.001) over placebo (0.2) for Q3 and were similarly improved for Q4 (1.4, 1.5 and 1.7) compared to placebo (0.5) (P<0.001). All vardenafil doses improved all IIEF domains compared to placebo (P<0.001). The percentage of successful intercourses was between 71 and 75% for the three vardenafil doses. For the 20 mg dose, 80% of the patients experienced improved erections (GAQ) compared to 30% for placebo. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (7-15%), flushing (10-11%) and up to 7% for dyspepsia or rhinitis. Vardenafil treatment resulted in a high efficacy and low adverse-event profile in a population with mixed ED etiologies.     

Efficacy and safety of on-demand tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in South-East Asian men

AIM: Tadalafil is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy and safety of tadalafil have been evaluated extensively in Western populations. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of on-demand tadalafil for the treatment of ED in South-East Asian men. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of men with mild to severe ED of various etiologies randomized to receive placebo (n = 122), tadalafil 10 mg (n = 120), or tadalafil 20 mg (n = 125), taken as needed (maximum once daily) for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary, and a Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: Men from China, Singapore, and the Philippines participated in this trial (n = 367). Compared with placebo, tadalafil significantly improved erectile dysfunction on all efficacy outcomes (P < 0.001). Patients receiving tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg experienced a significant mean improvement of 8.1 and 8.7, respectively, in the IIEF Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score from baseline (vs placebo 2.4, P < 0.001). In patients receiving tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, the mean per-patient success rate for intercourse attempts (SEP3) was 62% and 70%, respectively, compared with 32% for the placebo group (P < 0.001). Of patients who received tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, 81% and 86% reported improved erections at endpoint (GAQ) compared with 44% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events reported by patients were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for South-East Asian men with ED.     

Safety and efficacy of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction: Result of a bridging study in Japan

AIM: Vardenafil is a selective and highly potent phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), with improved selectivity for PDE5 and demonstrated efficacy for improving sexual function in men with ED. The current study investigated the safety and efficacy of this new PDE5 inhibitor in Japanese men with ED. METHODS: This was a prospective, double blind, randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vardenafil. Following a 4-week treatment-free observation period, 283 eligible patients were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo. Primary efficacy responses were assessed using the scores of Q3 and Q4 of the international index of erectile function (IIEF). RESULTS: All three vardenafil doses showed significantly better improvement than the placebo group in Q3 and Q4 scores of the IIEF questionnaire, either at 12 weeks or at the 'last observation carried forward' (LOCF, P < 0.0001). Q3 scores were improved to 4.06 with vardenafil 5 mg, 4.53 with vardenafil 10 mg, and 4.64 with vardenafil 20 mg, versus 3.17 with placebo. Comparable scores for Q4 were 3.47, 4.15 and 4.31 versus 2.31 for placebo. Up to 86% of patients achieved improved erections as assessed by the global assessment question (GAQ). Reported adverse event rates were 35.3%, 45.3% and 54.5% with vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively, versus 21.1% in the placebo group. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were transient headache, flushing and rhinitis, which were mostly mild. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED and provides improvement in key indices of erectile function among Japanese men with ED. The results of our trial show that up to nearly 90% of patients achieve improved erections with the administration of vardenafil.     

Clinical efficacy of Apomorphine SL in erectile dysfunction of diabetic men

Although subgroup analyses from large randomised premarketing studies have shown that Apomorphine SL enhances the percentage of erections firm enough for sexual intercourse in diabetic men, the clinical role of the drug in this patient population remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of Apomorphine SL in diabetic males with erectile dysfunction (ED) and to identify factors predicting those who may benefit from the treatment. A total of 130 diabetic patients were randomised to receive either four tablets of 3 mg Apomorphine or a matching placebo. Assessments of efficacy comprised the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the one-item global efficacy question (GEQ). Patients with both a positive response to the GEQ and an improvement of at least 5 points in the EF domain of the IIEF were considered responders and subanalysed by several parameters indicative of the severity of both ED and diabetes. Response rate was 17% after placebo and 22% after Apomorphine SL. The EF domain of the IIEF and both questions 3 and 4 scores did not significantly improve in either of the two arms over the baseline. A younger age and a lower Hb1Ac were significantly linked to the status of responder in the Apomorphine arm. Apomorphine SL failed to show a statistically significant benefit over a placebo, but 22% of patients had a clinically significant erectile response. These figures seem to suggest that the drug has a limited use for ED diabetic patients.     

Up-titration of vardenafil dose from 10 mg to 20 mg improved erectile function in men with spinal cord injury

AIM: Vardenafil is a highly selective phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Efficacy of vardenafil has been demonstrated in various ED populations, but that in Japanese patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) has not been assessed. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter, flexible dose, 12-week study in patients with ED due to SCI. Following a 4-week observation period, patients received vardenafil 10 mg for 4 weeks, and based on efficacy, tolerability and patient preference, doses for the remaining 8 weeks were decided by investigators. The primary efficacy parameter was erectile function domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function. RESULTS: Ten patients took 10 mg all through the study, while 22 patients took 20 mg after completing 4 weeks' treatment with 10 mg. The erectile function domain score increased from 12.2 at baseline to 25.0 at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) in the former group and from 10.3 to 22.5 in the latter group, respectively. Importantly, there was a 5.0 point increase in erectile function domain score after up-titration in the latter group. Drug-related adverse events were observed in 22% of patients including hot flushes (9%) and headache (6%), but these were transient and mild in intensity. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Vardenafil 10 and 20 mg was well tolerated and improved erectile function in patients with SCI. Of interest, erectile function was further improved by 20 mg in patients who were not sufficiently treated with 10 mg.