HER-2/neu oncogene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization in 130 breast cancers using tissue microarray and clinical follow-up studies

Determining of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification has become clinically important for managing breast cancer. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are currently regarded as the standard methods. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was investigated as a new modification with an accurate, sensitive technique. From 1998 to 2002, using CISH and IHC, the amplification and protein expression of the HER-2/neu oncogene were examined using paraffin sections in 130 breast carcinomas and to determine the prognostic role of HER-2/neu for outcome after a follow-up of 24- 64 months. Amplifications by CISH and overexpression by IHC were observed in 28 (22%) and 27 cases (20.8%), respectively. Of the 104 patients, 20 patients (19.2%) with amplification had a shorter disease-free interval (34.9 months vs. 38.0 months in controls) (p=0.372). 15 patients (14.4%) had a disease recurrence, but there is no significant difference between 3 patients amplifying the oncogene and 12 patients without oncogene (20.6 months vs. 19.6 months) (p=0.862). 6 patients (5.8%) of these died. CISH is a useful alternative, particularly for confirming the IHC results. There is no relationship between the early recurrence and the HER-2/neu positive group, but lymph node status was statistically significant.     

HER2 positivity in breast carcinoma: a comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with fluorescence in situ hybridization in tissue microarrays, with targeted evaluation of intratumoral heterogeneity by in situ hybridization.

An accurate and reproducible assay method for determining HER2 status is crucial, as a positive HER2 gene status is an eligibility requirement for Herceptintrade mark therapy. Although immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment is both practical and inexpensive, a worrying trend of high false-positive rates has been reported. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the universally accepted gold standard for confirming IHC 2+ cases and ambiguous results but is costly and requires specialized equipment and technical expertise. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) amalgamates the practical advantages of IHC with the reproducibility of FISH, and high concordance between the CISH and FISH methods has been reported in conventional sections. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) allow high throughput of specimens, and HER2 status assessment in TMA cores using IHC and FISH has correlated well with scores in conventional sections. The authors used TMA technology to compare the efficacy of ZYMED(R) CISH with PathVysiontrade mark FISH in a cohort of 119 archival breast resection cases and investigated possible intratumoral heterogeneity in a "mini-array" of 21 HercepTest "equivocal"/2+ cases. Concordance between FISH and CISH in TMA sections was 99%. All prescored 2+ HercepTest cases were nonamplified. Four 3+ HercepTest cases were classed as potential false-positives. The authors suggest that confirmatory ISH should be performed on all positive HercepTest cases. CISH was easier to perform and quicker to enumerate than FISH. The authors conclude that CISH is a practical alternative to FISH as a confirmatory tool for HER2 gene amplification status. Intratumoral heterogeneity did not affect the patient's HER2 status.     

Comparison of fluorescence and chromogenic in situ hybridization for detection of HER-2/neu oncogene in breast cancer

Determination of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification has become clinically important in the present management of breast cancer and may have important applications in other areas of clinical oncology and scientific research. In situ hybridization is an extremely accurate and sensitive technique for assessing amplification of HER-2/neu. A new method using a chromogen-labeled probe offers numerous advantages, including the ability to view the morphologic features of the cells of interest using a light microscope, which can be found in every laboratory. We used both techniques to assay 31 cases of infiltrating breast carcinoma; assays were performed in laboratories at 2 institutions. Identical results for both methods were found in 26 cases (10 amplified, 16 nonamplified). One case was misinterpreted as overexpressed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) because of background precipitate. In 4 cases, CISH suggested low-level amplification. Three of these cases subsequently were found to have chromosome 17 polysomy. In the remaining case, the initial section chosen was suboptimal, showing weak signals by both methods. If a probe for chromosome 17 (now available for CISH) is used in cases of questionable HER-2/neu amplification, CISH seems to be as accurate and more practical than FISH.     

Detection of Her-2/neu oncogene in breast carcinoma by chromogenic in situ hybridization in cytologic specimens

Determination of Her-2/neu oncogene amplification is important in the current treatment of breast carcinoma. In addition to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemical stain (HercepTest), chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has been shown to be a sensitive and specific method to determine the Her-2/neu status of surgical specimens. The effectiveness of CISH in detecting the Her-2/neu oncogene in cytologic specimens has not been well documented. Twenty-five cases of fine needle aspirate smears and touch imprints from infiltrating ductal carcinomas were examined. Both CISH and FISH were performed on each case using a digoxigenin-labeled Her-2 DNA probe for CISH (Zymed) and both Her-2 and chromosome 17 probes for FISH (Vysis). Sixty tumor cells were evaluated in each case. The scoring system and interpretation of CISH were as follows: (1) no amplification (<5 brown dots/nucleus), (2) amplification (>10 brown dots/nucleus), and (3) low-level amplification (5-9 brown dots/nucleus). Of the 25 cases analyzed, 23 (3 amplified and 20 nonamplified) showed similar results for both methods. Two cases were discordant. In these cases, low-level amplification was suggested by CISH but nonamplification by FISH. One of the cases can be explained by polysomy for chromosome 17 by FISH. In conclusion, our preliminary data suggest that CISH is a useful technique to determine Her-2/neu oncogene status in cytologic specimens. In a case of low-level amplification, a CISH chromosome 17 probe should be used, or FISH is recommended for confirmation.     

PGDS, a novel technique combining chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of ErbB2 (HER2/neu) status in breast cancer.

Given the important prognostic and predictive utility of v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ErbB2) [human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/neu)] in breast cancer, it is recommended that ErbB2 testing be performed on all invasive breast cancers at the time of diagnosis. A consensus, however, has not yet been reached as to the optimal method of evaluating ErbB2 status. Immunohistochemistry to detect protein overexpression and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect ErbB2 gene amplification are the most frequently used methods. As no one detection method fulfills all necessary requirements of reliability, reproducibility, and ease of use, we developed a novel approach in the form of a simple assay we refer to as protein and gene double staining (PGDS) which simultaneously evaluates protein overexpression and gene amplification by combining immunohistochemistry with chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). A total of 134 invasive breast carcinomas, including 81 cases with a full-face section and 53 cases included in a tissue microarray (TMA), were assessed by PGDS, and the results were correlated with ErbB2 gene amplification status as determined by FISH. ErbB2 gene copy number determined by CISH analysis in the PGDS assay showed excellent concordance with that of FISH (correlation coefficient 0.82; P<0.001 with full-face section cases, and 0.98; P<0.001 with cases in a TMA). The overall concordance rate for gene amplification status between PGDS and FISH was 90.12% in cases with a full-face section and 92.45% with TMA cases. Perfect correlation was seen between the PGDS assay and FISH in cases that were considered either nonamplified or highly amplified by the dual assay. Of the 17 cases that showed low amplification by PGDS, 5 were classified as nonamplified by FISH. Correction for chromosome 17 copy number in the FISH assessment contributed to the discordance between CISH and FISH results. This newly developed PGDS method represents a novel approach to ErbB2 status determination that combines the assessment of both protein overexpression and gene amplification in one simple assay. It is likely that this assay will aid in immunohistochemical calibration and will also increase the sensitivity and specificity of ErbB2 testing.     

显色原位杂交和免疫组织化学检测乳腺癌HER2/neu基因状况和蛋白表达的对照性研究

目的探讨显色原位杂交（CISH）在检测乳腺癌中HER2／neu基因扩增上的作用。方法挑选乳腺浸润性导管癌患者组织石蜡蜡块（回顾性255例,前瞻性271例）,进行免疫组织化学（IHC）、CISH检测。15例回顾性标本送往德国HERA检测中心进行FISH检测。结果（1）回顾性病例中IHC阳性3＋者CISH基因扩增率为91．6％（120／131）,IHC2＋者CISH基因扩增率为56．5％（39／69）,IHC与CISH检测结果符合率为81．2％（207／255）,两者明显相关（P〈0．01）。（2）前瞻性病例中IHC蛋白过表达率31．7％．CISH基因扩增率27．3％。IHC3＋者CISH基因扩增率为91．4％（53／58）,IHC2＋者CISH基因扩增率为46．4％（13／28）,IHC与CISH检测结果符合率为89．7％（243／271）,两者明显相关（P〈0．01）。（3）经德国检测中心荧光原位杂交（FISH）检测的15例中14例和CISH结果完全一致,1例检测失败,而CISH为无扩增。（4）CISH检测基因扩增与雌激素受体（ER）、孕激素受体（PR）表达明显负相关（P值均〈0．01）。结论CISH检测HER2基因扩增结果与IHC检测蛋白过表达及FISH结果高度一致,CISH是检测HER2基因扩增的一项新技术。     

HER-2/neu testing in breast carcinoma: a combined immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization approach.

We evaluated 750 consecutive invasive breast carcinomas for HER-2/neu utilizing a combination of immunohistochemical (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methodologies. IHC reactions of 3+ were considered HER-2/neu positive and 0 and 1+ IHC reactions were considered HER-2/neu negative. IHC reactions of 2+ were considered inconclusive and reflexed to FISH analysis. In addition, a 10% sampling and validation FISH analysis was performed on the positive and negative IHC tests. One hundred thirty-eight cases (18.4%) were HER-2/neu positive by IHC and/or FISH. One hundred twenty-three of the positive cases (89%) were 3+ IHC reactions and 14 positive cases were inconclusive by IHC and amplified by FISH. There was concordance with FISH in 77 of 78 (98.7%) of the positive or negative IHC cases that were tested (95% confidence interval [CI] = 93.1 to 100%). A single IHC-negative case showed HER-2/neu amplification by FISH. Thirty-nine cases were 2+ IHC (5.2%); 14 (36%) were amplified, 24 (62%) were not amplified, and one was not interpretable. HER-2/neu positivity was observed in 34% of grade 3 ductal carcinomas, 11.4% of grade 2 ductal carcinomas, 3.2% of grade 1 ductal carcinomas, and 3.2% of lobular carcinomas. Occasional cases with discordant IHC expression of HER-2/neu within the in situ and invasive carcinoma elements were also identified. IHC reliably characterized HER-2/neu in approximately 95% of the cases studied (95% CI = 93.0 to 96.2%) and was effective as a primary method for evaluating HER-2/neu status. In this study, 2+ IHC reactions were a heterogeneous group best regarded as indeterminate or inconclusive; in this series, only 36% were amplified by FISH analysis. Our findings suggest that a combination of IHC and FISH testing with FISH analysis performed reflexly on all 2+ IHC cases can optimize HER-2/neu testing.     

双探针显色和荧光原位杂交法检测乳腺癌HER2基因状态和17号染色体的分析

目的 通过与荧光原位杂交(FISH)比较,评估双探针显色原位杂交(双探针CISH)法在诊断女性乳腺浸润性导管癌HER2基因状态中应用的可靠性,同时探讨17号染色体多倍体对原位杂交诊断HER2基因状态时可能产生的影响.方法 收集146例乳腺癌组织的常规石蜡包埋标本,分别用欧盟(CE)认证的FISH(146例)及CISH(73例)HER2/17号染色体着丝粒(CENl7)双探针试剂盒技术,对肿瘤标本的HER2基因状态进行检测,并按照2007年美国临床肿瘤协会及美国病理家协会(ASCO/CAP)标准分别用计算HER2基因拷贝数和(或)计算HER2/CENl7比值的方法对结果进行分析.结果 在同时进行FISH和双探针CISH检测的73例标本中发现,两种技术对HER2阴性和阳性的诊断符合率分别为91.7%(33/36)和97.4%(37/38),两者的总体符合率为95.9%(70/73);在对146例FISH结果的计数分析中,计数HER2基因拷贝数得出不确定诊断的病例量是计数HER2/CENl7得出不确定诊断病例量的1.6倍(13/8);此外,在FISH和CISH结果中按拷贝数计数为阳性的病例与在按比值计数时却为阴性病例的不吻合率分别为4.8%(3/63)和3.O%(1/33);同时在FISH HER2阳性病例(HER2/CENl7)中多倍体发生率为63.5%(40/63,P=0.002),高于阴性者中多倍体的发生率(37.3%,28/75).结论 双探针CISH技术检测乳腺癌HER2基因状态的结果和FISH技术检测的结果非常一致,提示两种技术临床诊断价值相近,并且同步检测并计数HER2和17号染色体有助于明确HER2基因状态.     

Intratumoral heterogeneity of her-2/neu in invasive mammary carcinomas using fluorescence in-situ hybridization and tissue microarray

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization is increasingly being used to determine HER-2/neu status in patients with breast carcinoma. The possibility that intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2/neu gene amplification may potentially contribute to inaccurate assessment of HER-2/neu status was investigated in routine cases of invasive mammary carcinomas. From 169 representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks of invasive duct mammary carcinomas with grade 3 architecture, 48 cases were analyzed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and 59 analyses were performed. Intratumoral heterogeneity for HER-2/neu gene amplification was demonstrated in only 5 (16%) of 31 cases where morphologically similar areas of a single tumor were analyzed. We conclude from this study that intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2/neu gene amplification is a demonstrable but relatively uncommon occurrence. For invasive mammary carcinomas, the accurate assessment of HER-2/neu status by fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis is not significantly confounded by intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2/neu gene amplification in individual tumors.     

Analysis of HER-2/neu amplification in endometrial carcinoma by chromogenic in situ hybridization. Correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization, HER-2/neu, p53 and Ki-67 protein expression, and outcome.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most widely used technique to detect HER-2/neu gene amplification; however, it is only available in some institutions. In contrast, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) can be evaluated by routine light microscopy. In endometrial carcinoma there are few data concerning HER-2/neu status and prognosis. Therefore, we determined HER-2/neu gene status by CISH using a digoxigenin-labelled probe on 60 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded endometrial carcinomas. The data were compared with the immunohistochemistry of HER-2/neu (A0485, TAB250), p53, Ki-67, clinicopathological factors, and survival. By conventional light microscopy, HER-2/neu amplification (>/=6 copies >50% cancer cells) was detected in 14% (8/59) tumours, HER-2/neu overexpression (>10% cells moderate/strong complete membrane staining) in 22% (13/60) for A0485, and 18% (11/60) for TAB250, p53 (>10% +cells) in 61% (36/59), and Ki-67 (>50% +cells) in 50% (30/60). Discordant cases for CISH and immunohistochemistry, as well as all (2+) were further analysed by FISH (Vysis). Among 10 cases (2+) and not amplified by CISH, two showed low-level amplification by FISH. Significant correlation was found between amplification and protein overexpression (P相似文献   

Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens

García‐Caballero T, Grabau D, Green A R, Gregory J, Schad A, Kohlwes E, Ellis I O, Watts S & Mollerup J
(2010) Histopathology 56, 472–480
Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens Aims: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to reveal several genomic imbalances relevant to proper cancer diagnosis and to the correct treatment regime. However, FISH requires expensive and advanced fluorescence microscopes in addition to expertise in fluorescence microscopy. To determine whether a newly developed dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) method is a suitable alternative to FISH, we analysed the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) amplification level of 168 breast cancer specimens using dual‐colour CISH and FISH and compared the results. Methods and results: We found 100% agreement between HER2 status determined by FISH and dual‐colour CISH. Furthermore, we observed that the time used to score slides was significantly reduced by 28% in dual‐colour CISH compared with the FISH protocol. Concordance between HER2 protein status and dual‐colour CISH or FISH was equally good with an overall agreement of 96.8%. Correlation between the HER2/centromere 17 gene ratios obtained with dual‐colour CISH and FISH was highly significant with an overall correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.96. Conclusions: We conclude that dual‐colour CISH and bright field microscopy are excellent alternatives to FISH when analysing the HER2 status of primary breast cancer.     

HER2状态与脑膜瘤分级及复发的相关性

目的 探讨HER2、细胞增殖指标Ki-67、胸苷激酶1(TK1)与脑膜瘤分级和良性脑膜瘤复发的相关性.方法 按2007年WHO神经系统肿瘤分类分级标准选取良性未复发的脑膜瘤、不典型脑膜瘤及恶性脑膜瘤石蜡标本各20例,并选取间期良性复发的脑膜瘤石蜡标本20例,将实验对象分为4组:良性非复发组、良性复发组、不典型组及恶性组.采用免疫组织化学MaxVision法对4组石蜡切片进行HER2、Ki-67、TK1蛋白的检测;并运用双色荧光原位杂交(FISH)法检测HER2蛋白表达阳性样本的HER2基因扩增情况.结果 免疫组织化学:(1)良性非复发组、良性复发组、不典型组和恶性组脑膜瘤的HER2阳性的例数分别为3例(15%)、6例(30%)、7例(35%)和10例(50%),随恶性程度增加,HER2蛋白阳性率升高(P<0.05);良性复发组HER2阳性率高于良性非复发组(P<0.05);(2)良性非复发组Ki-67和TK1的标记指数(U)均分别低于不典型组和恶性组(P<0.05);不典型组低于恶性组(P<0.05),随着恶性程度增高,Ki-67、TK1 LI升高;且良性复发组高于良性非复发组(P<0.05);(3)HER2与Ki-67、TK1均呈正相关(均P<0.01),Ki-67与TK1呈正相关(P<0.05).FISH法:(1)在26例HER2蛋白阳性表达的脑膜瘤组织中HER2/neu基因的扩增率为26.9%(7/26);HER2蛋白表达3+、2+者HER2/neu基因扩增比例分别为3,/4和4/6,均多于1+者(均P<0.01),3+者与2+者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).(2)26例HER2蛋白阳性表达的脑膜瘤组织中9例存在17号染色体的非整倍性(34.6%),但HER2蛋白表达1+、2+、3+者间17号染色体的非整倍性出现率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 HER2阳性且Ki-67或TK1 LI高提示脑膜瘤恶性程度较高或复发可能性较大.脑膜瘤组织中存在HER2/neu基因的扩增.HER2、Ki-67和TK1蛋白可能可以作为临床判断脑膜瘤生物学行为的参考指标.     

Determination of HER2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in archival breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH(TM)) with fluorescence in situ (FISH) hybridization and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in determination of the HER2 status in human breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER2 gene amplification was determined on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of 62 invasive breast cancers by FISH and followed by CISH using a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled HER2 DNA probe generated by Subtraction Probe Technology (SPT(TM)), and a biotin-labeled chromosome 17 centromeric (chr.17cen) probe. The sections were heat treated and enzyme digested. After in situ hybridization, the HER2 probe was detected with fluorescein (FITC)-anti-DIG for FISH, followed by peroxidase-anti-FITC and diaminobenzidine (DAB) for CISH. The chr.17cen probe was detected with peroxidase-streptavidin and DAB. For CISH application, HER2 gene copies or chromosome 17 centromeres and morphology of cells were easily visualized simultaneously with a 40x objective under bright-field microscope in hematoxylin-counterstained sections. IHC study of HER2 overexpression was performed on adjacent sections using a panel of three HER2 antibodies (TAB 250, CB11, A0485), and staining was scored according to the criteria specified in the HercepTest. RESULTS: HER2 gene amplification detected by CISH was visualized typically as large DAB-stained clusters or by many dots in the nucleus. FISH and CISH identified HER2 gene amplification in 19% of the tumors. Chromosome 17 polysomy was detected in 31% of the tumors. HER2 overexpression was demonstrated in 19% (TAB 250), 23% (CB11), and 36% (A0485) of the tumors. Complete concordance between the results of CISH with FISH, TAB 250, CB11, and A0485 was seen in 100%, 97%, 94%, and 84% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: By permitting observation of morphology using a bright-field microscope, CISH is an accurate, practical, and economical approach to screen HER2 status in breast cancers. It is a useful methodology for confirming ambiguous IHC results.     

Her-2/neu expression in salivary duct carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization study.

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) shares significant morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with ductal carcinoma of the breast, including HER-2/neu expression. Previous studies have detected HER-2/neu at the protein level in SDCs; however, no study, to date, has assayed whether this expression is related to gene amplification detected by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 12 previously diagnosed SDCs were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and CISH for HER-2/neu status. Result concordance was seen in all 12 cases. A total of 4 SDCs were positive by IHC; all 4 cases showed amplification with CISH. The remaining 8 cases were negative by IHC and showed no gene amplification with CISH. SDCs in this study show HER-2/neu overexpression on both the protein and gene levels in approximately 30% of cases. These findings suggest a role may exist for Herceptin (trastuzumab) based therapy in some SDC patients.     

Detection of c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) amplification in breast carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue sections and imprinted cells

Abnormalities in c-erbB-2 have attracted a great deal of attention. Treatment using an antibody against the c-erbB-2 gene product is effective against breast cancers with amplification and/or overexpression of c-erbB-2. There is an urgent need to establish methodology for selecting patients who would benefit from this therapy. A total of 235 breast carcinomas were examined for c-erbB-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections with discernible immunostaining from 52 tumors, 70 negative tumors and smear imprints from 35 patients were examined by dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for c-erbB-2 and the centromeric region of chromosome 17. The concordance between gene amplification and protein overexpression was 95.7%. When the findings of the two FISH preparation techniques were compared, no discrepancies were found in 24 of the tumors. However, differences were seen in eight cases. In six of these cases the differences did not affect the presence or absence of amplification, but in the other two cases, considered to show low-level amplification on paraffin sections, polysomy 17 was detected instead. It was concluded that FISH is an excellent tool to detect gene amplification in particular, and FISH on touch imprints is a useful adjunct to differentiate between low-level amplification and polysomy 17.     

Analysis of HER2 by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in lymph node-negative breast carcinoma: Prognostic relevance

In patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma (LNNBC), the prevalence of HER2 overexpression and gene amplification and their prognostic value have not been extensively evaluated. We examined 162 patients with LNNBC with complete follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2, Ki67, and p53 was performed. HER2 gene status was analyzed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and discordant cases by fluorescence in situ hybridization. HER2 overexpression was seen in 24.7% of cases (40/162) and amplification by CISH in 17.6% (28/159). Agreement between IHC and CISH was achieved in 147 (92.5%) cases. Amplification was seen in 21 (100%) of 21 (3+), 6 (35.3%) of 17 (2+), and 1 (0.6%) of 121 (0-1+) tumors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected 3 (1.8%) additional cases. HER2 overexpression and amplification were present in tumors of high grade, with necrosis and lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) (all P < .027). In addition, amplified tumors showed Ki67 of more than 20% and p53 overexpression (P < .05). By univariate analysis, shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were seen for patients with tumors showing HER2 amplification, LVI, and Ki67 of more than 20% (P < .05) (Kaplan-Meier). However, the multivariate analysis (Cox regression) demonstrated only Ki67 as an independent prognostic factor for both DFS (P = .017) and OS (P = .010), and as a trend for HER2 gene status (OS, P = .087) and LVI (DFS, P = .11; OS, P = .063). We conclude that IHC is a reliable method for detecting HER2 expression that can be complemented by CISH in nondefinitive cases (2+). Moreover, CISH is a valuable tool for the assessment of HER2 gene status with potential prognostic value and, therefore, in clinical decision making for treatment of high-risk LNNBC.     

Role of chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in the evaluation of HER2 status in breast carcinoma: comparison with immunohistochemistry and FISH

We report our experience with Chromogenic in Situ Hybridization (CISH) for the evaluation of HER2 amplification on 55 cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded invasive breast carcinomas of different histology. All the results were corrected for chromosome 17 aneusomy and compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC); a subset of cases was compared to FISH. Thirty-one of 32 cases in which FISH and CISH were performed yielded the same results. CISH and IHC showed a good concordance in the 0/1+ and 3+ category, while a poor agreement with weakly protein overexpression was confirmed. Chromosome 17 analysis was necessary in cases with a low number of HER2 gene copies. CISH is a useful tool to evaluate breast cancer HER2 status that can be easily implemented in a laboratory of surgical pathology.