Should ulnar styloid be fixed following fixation of a distal radius fracture?,

IntroductionFracture of the base of the ulnar styloid has shown to have higher incidence of TFCC tears and DRUJ instability leading to nonunion and impaired function. Poorer functional outcomes of the distal radius fracture have been attributed to the untreated associated ulnar styloid fractures while some studies have shown no difference. Thus, the treatment remains controversial. However, it has been shown that fractures at the base of the ulnar styloid have a higher incidence of tears in the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and instability in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), which can lead to nonunion and impaired function. Despite this, there are currently no studies comparing the outcomes of surgically and conservatively treated patients.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the outcomes of intra-articular distal radius fractures associated with base of ulnar fracture treated with distal radius LCP fixation. The study included 14 patients who were treated surgically and 49 patients who were treated conservatively, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Radiological parameters such as union and amount of displacement, VAS score for ulnar-sided wrist pain, functional assessment using the modified Mayo score and the quick DASH questionnaire and complications were analyzed.ResultsAt the final follow-up, the mean scores for pain (VAS), functional outcomes (modified Mayo score), disability (QuickDASH score), range of motion, and non-union rate were found to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) between the surgically treated and conservatively treated groups. However, patients with non-union had statistically significant higher scores for pain (VAS), greater post-operative displacement of the styloid, poorer functional outcomes, and higher disability (p < 0.05).ConclusionWhile there was no significant difference in ulnar-sided wrist pain and functional outcomes between the surgically treated and conservatively treated groups, the conservatively treated cases had a higher risk of non-union, which can negatively impact functional outcomes. The amount of pre-operative displacement was found to be a key factor in predicting non-union and can be used as a guide for determining the management of this type of fracture.     

Does concomitant ulnar styloid fracture and distal radius fracture portend poorer outcomes? A meta-analysis of comparative studies

PurposeAn ulnar styloid fracture often occur in association with a distal radial fracture. Whether an ulnar styloid fracture interfere with the results of a distal radial fracture still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of an accompanying ulnar styloid fracture on clinical outcomes in patients with distal radial fractures.MethodsA meta-analysis of published studies comparing outcomes of distal radial fractures with an ulnar styloid fracture versus isolated distal radial fractures was performed. Outcomes of function results, radiological evaluation, and patient reported scores were analyzed.ResultsTen studies including 1403 distal radius fractures were identified fitting inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in wrist motion, grip strength, radial height, volar angle, ulnar variance, pain score, PRWE score, or SF-36 score for distal radial fractures associated with an ulnar styloid fracture versus isolated distal radial fractures. In final follow up, patients with associated an ulnar styloid fracture had lower radial inclination and higher DASH scores. But there was no significant clinical difference. In addition, we found there was no significant difference of outcomes between union and non-union ulnar styloid fractures.ConclusionsBased on this meta-analysis, we suggest that an associated ulnar styloid fracture does not affect the outcomes of a distal radial fracture and clinicians should be caution in electing operative treatment for patients with an ulnar styloid fracture.     

What's the best surgical repair technique of an ulnar styloid fracture? A biomechanical comparison of different techniques

Introduction8-10% of all Ulnar styloid fractures (USF) accompanying distal radius fractures are addressed surgically. The surgical fixation has to counteract forces of translation and rotation acting on the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The different technics used were never compared biomechanically. Our study aims to compare the effects of different techniques of USF fixation on the forearm rotation and the dorsal-palmar (DP)-translation of the DRUJ.Material and methods9 forearm specimens were mounted on a custom testing system. Load was applied for Pronosupination and DP-translation with the forearm placed in neutral position, pronation and supination. The positional change of the DRUJ was measured using a MicroScribe. Six different, sequential conditions were tested in the same specimen: intact, USF and 4 repair techniques (2 K-wire, tension band wiring (TBW), headless compression screw, suture anchor).ResultsThe USF significantly increased DP-translation and pronosupination compared to the intact condition. The DP-translation in neutral was reduced significantly with all four techniques compared to the USF condition. TBW and suture anchor also showed a significant difference to the K-wire fixation. In supination only the TBW and suture anchor significantly decreased DP-Translation. The rotational stability of the DRUJ was only restored by the K-wire fixation and the TBW.ConclusionsAll four USF repair techniques partially restored translational stability; however, only K-wire fixation and TBW techniques restored rotational stability. TBW was biomechanically superior to the other techniques as it restored translational stability and rotational stability.     

Where is the distal fracture line location of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures?

No consensus currently exists on the facture location of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures (DRFs). We present a systematic evaluation of the distal fracture line (DFL) location of DRFs and possible influencing factors. Determining the average location of DRFs provides a basis for developing more sensitive tests to determine bone strength using a variety of imaging techniques and for developing improved biomechanical models to test fracture characteristics and surgical implants. Initial radiographs of 157 DRFs dorsally displaced DRFs in patients aged 40–74 years were identified, patient and trauma specific data were collected, and standard radiographic measurements and (AO) fracture classification were performed. The dorsal and palmar DFL locations relative to the corresponding apex of the lunate facet were measured. The DFL was located dorsally 7.9 ± 2.7 mm and palmarly 11.7 ± 3.9 mm proximal to the corresponding lunate fossa apex. The dorsal DFL was significantly distal to the palmar one (p < 0.001), but the two did not correlate (r² = 0.018, p = 0.095). DFL location was independent of age, energy of the fall, and fracture complexity. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:489–494, 2011     

Can the displacement of a conservatively treated distal radius fracture be predicted at the beginning of treatment?

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the final displacement of conservatively treated distal radius fractures can be predicted after primary reduction. We analysed the radiographic documents of 311 patients with a conservatively treated distal radius fracture at the time of injury, after reduction and after bony consolidation. We measured the dorsal angulation (DA), the radial angle (RA) and the radial shortening (RS) at each time point. The parameters were analysed separately for metaphyseally "stable" (A2, C1) and "unstable" (A3, C2, C3) fractures, according to the AO classification system. Spearman's rank correlations and regression functions were determined for the analysis. The highest correlations were found for the DA between the time points 'reduction' and 'complete healing' (r = 0.75) and for the RA between the time points 'reduction' and 'complete healing' (r = 0.80). The DA and the RA after complete healing can be predicted from the regression functions.     

Ipsilateral fracture of distal and proximal ends of the radius: Does this injury pattern deserve special attention?

Background

Ipsilateral proximal and distal radial fractures represent an injury spectrum following trauma due to axial loading of forearm. This spectrum may vary from a minimal (undisplaced fractures at either ends) to a severe insult (associated proximal and distal ulnar fracture, comminution, displaced fragments and probable interosseous membrane damage).

Methods

Series of five cases on ipsilateral proximal and distal radial fractures and their results. Two of these cases occurred in paediatric age group.

Results

Both these injuries commonly result from a fall on outstretched hand. In older age group, especially osteoporotic elderly women, the fracture pattern can be a result of low energy trauma with minimal displacement of fractures. In younger age group, the injury complex mainly results from high-energy trauma with comminution, instability and significant soft tissue damage. The proximal fractures might be a part of a more severe elbow dislocation which may not be obvious at the time trauma radiographs are taken. The main sequellae in the series were related to involvement of radial head. In the paediatric group, the fracture pattern was complicated by avascular necrosis of radial epiphysis and premature physeal fusion.

Conclusions

Ipsilateral proximal and distal radial fracture is an uncommon injury pattern. The series illustrates a number of problems associated with this combination. Firstly, one should be aware of this rare injury pattern and there should be greater emphasis on clinical examination of elbow in cases of wrist injuries and vice versa. Once diagnosed, one faces the dilemma of appropriate management in these cases. The appropriate management will depend on the injury characteristics including the age of the patient and the fracture pattern. One should try to preserve the radial head to prevent a possible proximal radial migration especially in younger patients. In children, these injuries are extremely prone to complications and forewarning the parents of a possible poor result while treating these injuries is important.     

Desmoid tumour following a distal radius fracture – a complication or a coincidence?

We describe a case of a desmoid tumour occurring 15 months following an uncomplicated fracture of the left distal radius. The occurrence of a desmoid tumour after fracture is extremely rare and a Medline search revealed only two previous reports. The correlation between the site of trauma and the tumour and the time interval between trauma and presentation strongly supports a causal role of the fracture in the occurrence of this tumour.     

Osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures with the Micronail®

Introduction

The Micronail^® is a minimally invasive intramedullar titanium locking screw fixation for two-part dislocated extra-articular fractures and average displaced intra-articular fractures.

Patients and methods

In a retrospective study we analyzed the outcome of 20 distal radius fractures in 18 patients (17 female, mean age 78 years), which were treated by Micronail^®. Average follow-up time was 4 months. We describe the operative technique. All fractures were classified according to AO guidelines. We studied the radiologic and clinical outcome.

Results

According to the AO classification there were 12 A2, 3 A3, 1 B1, and 1 B3 fracture. Three patients had an antebrachii fracture. Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 2.4. Eight patients had associated lesions. Average operative time was 58 min. All fractures healed without major loss of alignment. There were two major complications: one patient developed a carpal tunnel syndrome and one device secondary dislocated. With the use of the Micronail^®, we found no infections or complications due to the insertion of the osteosynthesis materials. Patients experienced good to excellent results, on an analogue scale, in function of their wrist from the procedure. All patients had a good range of motion of the operated wrist; the difference between their two wrists was maximal 10° in all directions.

Conclusion

This intramedullary implant intends to minimize some of the disadvantages of other surgical options in the treatment of distal radius fracture; the Micronail^® causes less tissue damage and has early load-carrying capacity. This minimally invasive technique seems suitable in selected, two-part dislocated extra-articular and average displaced intra-articular, distal radius fractures.     

Distal forearm fracture in the adult: is ORIF of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna a treatment option in distal forearm fracture?

INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures in younger adults are rare injuries resulting from high energy trauma. Treatment options vary from cast fixation, external fixator, percutaneus pinning and open reduction and internal fixation. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients aged 18-59 from 1996 to 2005 with a distal unstable forearm fracture. All were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the radius. The ulna was stabilized either by an open reduction and internal fixation or by a closed reduction with or without pin fixation and cast fixation in all cases. At follow-up, we evaluated the radiologic results in terms of forearm fracture retention and functional outcome according to the wrist score by Krimmer. RESULT: Radial inclination amounted to 24 degrees at the injured side when compared to 27 degrees at the non-injured side, palmar tilt was 3 degrees versus 7 degrees and ulna variance was -2 versus -1 mm. According to the modified wrist score by Krimmer, seven excellent, two good and four fair results were achieved. The range of motion of the injured wrist joint was 149 degrees of rotation, in the sagittal plane 106 degrees , frontal plane 61 degrees and on the non-injured side rotation was 171 degrees , and movement in the sagittal plane was 146 degrees and 79 degrees in the frontal plane. Decreased forearm rotation (107 degrees vs. 162 degrees ) and decreased range of motion in the sagittal plane (77 degrees vs. 114 degrees ) were measured in patient following open reduction and internal fixation of radius and ulna compared to the outcome in patients with open reduction and internal fixation of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna. Grip strength of the injured side averaged 350 N versus 440 N which is 76% of that of the opposite side. All patients stated no pain at rest and some experienced slight pain at work. Three patients had an excellent performance at daily activities, nine patients presented problems with certain activities, and one patient showed severe limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of the radius is the keystone in treating distal forearm fracture. In case of stable retention of the ulnar head after closed reduction, cast fixation with or without percutaneus pin fixation is a sufficient method to treat unstable distal forearm fractures. In patients with remaining instability of the distal ulna fracture, ORIF is indicated.     

Long-term results of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures treated with the pi-plate: is hardware removal necessary?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using dorsal plates and screws (AO/ASIF pi-plate) for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius. Although extensor tendon rupture is a recognized complication of all distal radial fractures, there appears to be an increased risk of this using dorsal plating. In addition, there is the added complication of extensor tendon irritation and dorsal wrist pain, which may necessitate plate removal. The low-profile pi-plates intended to overcome this problem have not done so, with quoted rates ranged from 19% to 55%.We treated 32 completely evaluated patients (13 men and 19 women) in our department between 2000 and 2004, with an average age of 46 years. They underwent ORIF of dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius using the specially designed pi-plate. Bone graft was used in 18 patients who had significant metaphyseal defect. Clinical examination, plain radiographs, and functional assessments using the modified Mayo Wrist Score were performed at an average follow-up of 86 months (range, 56-115 months). Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all 32 fractures at the time of operative fixation with no instances of loss of fracture reduction during the study period. According to the Mayo Wrist Score, 23 patients (72%) had excellent or very good results, 7 (22%) had fair results, and 2 (6%) had poor results. Two cases (6.25%) of extensor tendon rupture were noted during the first postoperative month, and 2 other patients showed progressive weakness of index finger extension 6 months postoperatively. The remaining 28 patients had no soft tissue problems.     

A revolution in the management of fractures of the distal radius?

The recent development of locking-plate technology has led to a potential revolution in the management of fractures of the distal radius. This review examines the evidence for pursuing anatomical restoration of the distal radius and the possible advantages and pitfalls of using volar locking plates to achieve this goal. The available evidence for adopting volar locking plates is presented and a number of important and, as yet unanswered, questions are highlighted.     

Epidemiology of distal radius fracture in Stockholm 1981–82

Background Theoretically, the motion of a bipolar hip prosthesis is most likely to occur at the inner joint if the frictional coefficients are equal at both surfaces. However, many studies have suggested that most motion occurs at the outer joint. Material and methods We performed an analysis of motion in a cadaveric bone model and in 50 patients during fluoroscopic examination, to determine how the motion is distributed between the two joints and what factors contribute to this distribution. Results The motion distributions varied widely between the patients. However, there was a relative preponderance (63–90%) of outer motion in all directions of leg movement in addition to a persistent coexistence of motion at both joints in 44 of 50 patients. This preponderance of outer motion was the result of an early impingement of the acetabular cup and structural differences between the two joints. Interpretation An adjustment of the positive eccentricity and a decrease in the frictional torque of the inner joint as a result of better lubrication and smoothness can be expected to improve the motion distribution, thus reducing the amount of acetabular erosion.     

Biomechanical testing of the fractured distal radius treated with a new bone cement--is it strong enough?

This study evaluates the in vitro ability of CAP, a bone graft substitute with osteointegration and osteoconductive properties, to restore the anatomy and strength of fractured distal radii. Ten pairs of cadaveric radii were imaged and tested to failure, simulating a fracture. The radii were reconstructed using CAP and were re-fractured and sequentially imaged. The deformities of the bones were determined through computerised evaluation of the radiographs. Radiographic analysis showed that CAP is capable of restoring the anatomy of the distal radius. The load and work required to fracture intact radii were compared to those required to fracture the reconstructed radii. The load to fracture was similar in the two situations. The work to fracture, however, was higher with reconstructed radii, suggesting that these are stronger than the original bones. Our study supports the hypothesis that CAP is capable of restoring the original anatomy and dimensions of the distal radius and re-establishing its mechanical strength.     

Brodie’s abscess following percutaneous fixation of distal radius fracture in a child

We report the case of a Brodie’s abscess presenting five and a half years following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a distal radius fracture. The index surgery was complicated by a pin site infection that was treated successfully with antibiotics. The patient represented with forearm pain years later, and radiological investigations revealed a Brodie’s abscess in the distal radius at the site of the previous Kirschner wires. The Brodie’s abscess was managed through surgical curettage and antibiotics. Staphylococcus aureus and diphtheroid organisms were cultured from the intraoperative specimens. A Brodie’s abscess is a form of localised subacute osteomyelitis, which usually occurs in the metaphysis of long bones and can mimic malignancy. Previous trauma or surgery has been implicated as predisposing factors. We have only identified one previously reported case of Brodie’s abscess following percutaneous pinning. Ours is the first reported case in an adolescent. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of this rare complication and review the current literature.     

Does formal education and training of staff reduce the operation rate for fractures of the distal radius?

BackgroundFractures of the distal radius are one of the most common extremity fractures, and operation rates are increasing. Staff within our unit felt that formal teaching, particularly of new medical staff, with regards to fracture reduction and appropriate cast application could result in a reduction in operation rates.MethodsRetrospective data was extracted from FORD (Fracture Outcome and Research Database), including: number of fractures, number of fractures undergoing ORIF, fracture configuration, patient demographics, and mechanism of injury. All patients undergoing ORIF had their radiographs assessed by two separate reviewers. Information regarding adequate fracture reduction, adequate cast application (using Gap Index), and appropriate plaster cast moulding was recorded. Formal teaching was then given to the next group of medical staff rotating through the unit, and the same data was collected prospectively for that six-month period. Exclusion criteria included bilateral injuries, and polytrauma patients.ResultsA total of 1623 distal radial fractures were treated in our unit over the 12-month period, with 71 undergoing ORIF in the first 6 months and 39 in the second 6 months, this was statistically significant (p = 0.0009). Our study found that formal teaching and education significantly reduced the operation rate for distal radial fractures. This effect was most significant for extra-articular, dorsally angulated fractures of the distal radius.ConclusionOur study proves that just 1 h of basic training at the beginning of an attachment can have significant benefits to both the unit and, more importantly, the patients.     

Nonunion of distal radius fracture and distal radioulnar joint injury: a modified Sauvé–Kapandji procedure with a cubitus proradius transposition as autograft

The Sauvé–Kapandji (SK) procedure is indicated in distal radius nonunion or malunion and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. It can also be used to treat the rheumatoid wrist with severe degenerative changes in the DRUJ. The main objective is to allow a pain-free range of movement. We present a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and distal radius nonunion who, after three operations, was treated with the SK procedure. The clinical and radiological results were excellent. A 53-year-old woman diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis fell on her forearm at home 2 years ago. Examination at an outpatient clinic revealed a distal radius fracture classified as type V according to the Frykman classification. She had been operated three times with open reduction internal fixation using a plate, screws, and bone allograft. She came to our institution with a distal radius nonunion, positive post-traumatic ulnar variance, and ulnar nerve paresis. The range of movements was 20°–10° flexion-extension and 40°–30° pronation–supination, and she needed daily fentanyl. We performed a modified SK procedure with an autologous iliac crest bone graft and ulnar bone graft from the osteotomy area (cubitus proradius), bone morphogenetic protein, and a low profile distal radius plate. After 1 year of follow-up, the distal radius fracture has healed and the wrist is pain-free with a complete range of movement in flexion-extension and pronation-supination. The main indication for the SK procedure is post-traumatic positive ulnar variance and associated ulnocarpal impaction. The cubitus proradius bone graft transposition is an interesting technical note that makes this case a challenge for skilled orthopedic hand surgeons.     

Bicortical K-wires for distal radius fracture fixation: how many?

The aim of this study was to find out whether number and position of K-wires influence the stability of distal radius fractures treated by percutaneous wire fixation. Patients who underwent K-wire fixation for unstable fractures of the distal radius over a period of three years were included in this retrospective study. Radiographs taken immediately after the procedure and radiographs taken after removal of K-wires were analysed to study three radiological parameters: palmar or dorsal tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance. Loss of these angles was analysed statistically against the number of wires (2 or 3) and position of wires (from radial styloid or a combination of styloid and dorsal wires). Ninety-five fractures were analysed with a mean age of 52.8 years and male to female ratio of 1:2. Average loss of radial inclination was 5.2 degrees, loss of palmar tilt was 8.3 degrees and loss of ulnar variance was 3.4 mm. Using 3 wires or using a dorsal wire in addition to the styloid wires both improved the final radial length by 1.2 mm and 2 mm respectively, but the effects were statistically not significant. We found that the number or position of wires did not influence radiological outcome. Based on our findings we recommend the use of two K-wires: one from the radial styloid and one from the dorsal side for these fractures.