Effects of acute withdrawal on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice

Rationale

Reexposure to ethanol during acute withdrawal might facilitate the transition to alcoholism by enhancing the rewarding effect of ethanol.

Objective

The conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure was used to test whether ethanol reward is enhanced during acute withdrawal.

Methods

DBA/2J mice were exposed to an unbiased one-compartment CPP procedure. Ethanol (0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 g/kg IP) was paired with a distinctive floor cue (CS+), whereas saline was paired with a different floor cue (CS?). The withdrawal (W) group received CS+ trials during acute withdrawal produced by a large dose of ethanol (4 g/kg) given 8 h before each trial. The no-withdrawal (NW) group did not experience acute withdrawal during conditioning trials but was matched for acute withdrawal experience. Floor preference was tested in the absence of ethanol or acute withdrawal.

Results

All groups eventually showed a dose-dependent preference for the ethanol-paired cue, but development of CPP was generally more rapid and stable in the W groups than in the NW groups. Acute withdrawal suppressed the normal activating effect of ethanol during CS+ trials, but there were no group differences in test activity.

Conclusions

Acute withdrawal enhanced ethanol’s rewarding effect as indexed by CPP. Since this effect depended on ethanol exposure during acute withdrawal, the enhancement of ethanol reward was likely mediated by the alleviation of acute withdrawal, i.e., negative reinforcement. Enhancement of ethanol reward during acute withdrawal may be a key component in the shift from episodic to chronic ethanol consumption that characterizes alcoholism.     

DBA/2J mice develop stronger lithium chloride-induced conditioned taste and place aversions than C57BL/6J mice

Genetic differences in lithium-induced conditioned aversion were examined using both place- and taste-conditioning procedures. In the place-conditioning procedure, adult male C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice were exposed to a differential conditioning procedure in which each mouse received four 30-min pairings of a distinctive floor cue immediately after IP injections of either 0.75, 1.5, or 3. 0 mEq/kg LiCl. A different floor cue was paired with saline injections. A separate group of control mice received saline injections paired with both floor types. Subsequent floor preference testing revealed greater conditioned aversion in D2 mice compared to B6 mice in groups receiving 3.0 mEq/kg LiCl. Lower LiCl doses did not produce conditioning in either strain. In a conditioned taste-aversion procedure, fluid-restricted mice received four trials in which access to 0.2 M NaCl solution was followed by IP injection of either 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mEq/kg LiCl. D2 mice showed stronger conditioned taste aversion than B6 mice at all doses, suggesting that taste conditioning may be a more sensitive index of aversive drug sensitivity than place conditioning. These findings are not well explained by strain differences in general learning ability or by strain differences in stimulus salience or innate preference. Rather, these data appear more consistent with previous studies showing strain differences in lithium pharmacokinetics and in general sensitivity to aversive events.     

Baclofen alters ethanol-stimulated activity but not conditioned place preference or taste aversion in mice.

The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in male DBA/2J mice. Mice in the CPP experiment received four pairings of ethanol (2g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). On intervening days (CS- sessions), mice received saline injections paired with a different floor type. On CS+ days, mice also received one of four doses of baclofen (0.0. 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/kg) 15 min before an injection of ethanol. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections, and were placed on a half-grid and half-hole floor for a 60-min session. Baclofen dose dependently reduced ethanol-stimulated activity, but did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CPP at any dose. For the CTA experiment, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of saline or baclofen (2.0 and 6.0 mg/kg) 15 min before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Baclofen did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA at any dose. In addition, baclofen alone did not produce a CTA. Overall, these studies show that activation of GABA(B) receptors with baclofen reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activation, but does not alter ethanol's rewarding or aversive effects in the CPP and CTA paradigms in DBA/2J mice.     

GABAA receptors modulate ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and taste aversion in mice

  Rationale: GABA_A receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce ethanol self-administration and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in rats, suggesting a role for the GABA_A receptor in modulating ethanol’s motivational effects. Objectives: The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA_A receptor antagonists, bicuculline and picrotoxin, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and CTA in male DBA/2J mice. Methods: Mice in the CPP experiments received four pairings of ethanol (2 g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). During CS+ sessions, mice also received bicuculline (0, 1.0, 3.0, or 5.0 mg/kg) or picrotoxin (2.0 mg/kg) before an injection of ethanol. On intervening days (CS– sessions), the pretreatment injection was always vehicle followed by saline injections that were paired with a different floor type. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections and were placed on a half grid and half hole floor for a 60-min session. For the CTA experiments, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of vehicle, bicuculline (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg), or picrotoxin (0.75 and 2.5 mg/kg) before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Results: Both picrotoxin and the lowest dose of bicuculline (1.0 mg/kg) significantly increased the magnitude of CPP relative to vehicle-treated controls. Picrotoxin alone did not produce place conditioning. Ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity was significantly reduced during conditioning trials with picrotoxin and the higher doses of bicuculline (3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg). Bicuculline did not alter ethanol-induced CTA; however, picrotoxin dose-dependently increased the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA. Bicuculline and picrotoxin did not produce CTA when administered alone. Conclusions: Overall, these results suggest that blockade of GABA_A receptors with bicuculline and picrotoxin enhances ethanol’s motivational effects in the CPP paradigm; however, only picrotoxin enhances ethanol’s motivational effects in the CTA paradigm. Received: 12 September 1998 / Final version: 21 December 1998     

Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, but not aversion, is blocked by treatment with d-penicillamine, an inactivation agent for acetaldehyde

Rationale There is evidence to suggest that acetaldehyde is involved in the control of ethanol-seeking behavior and reward. d-penicillamine, a thiol amino acid, is a highly selective agent for the inactivation of acetaldehyde. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that d-penicillamine prevents both behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol and acetaldehyde-produced locomotor depression in mice. Objectives The contribution of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde to the affective effects of ethanol (preference and aversion) was assessed using an unbiased place conditioning design. Methods Male mice received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+: GRID+ or HOLE+) with injections of saline and ethanol (2 g/kg) given before (preference) or after (aversion) the 5-min exposure to the place conditioning apparatus. A different floor stimulus (CS−: GRID− or HOLE−), associated with saline-saline injections on alternate days, was presented. For a different group of animals, the pairings with the CS+ were associated with saline and ethanol injections, but on alternate days, they received d-penicillamine (50 or 75 mg/kg) and ethanol injections paired with the CS−floor stimulus. A 60-min preference test was carried out 24 h after the last conditioning trial. A similar procedure was followed to test the effect of d-penicillamine on morphine (16 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced (20 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP). Results CPP and conditioned place aversion (CPA) were observed for ethanol, but d-penicillamine only blocked CPP. d-penicillamine, by itself, did not produce either rewarding or aversive effects. CPP observed for morphine and cocaine was unaffected by d-penicillamine pretreatment. Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that the selective inactivation of acetaldehyde blocked the rewarding, but not aversive, effects of ethanol and support the role of this ethanol metabolite in the affective properties of ethanol.     

CB1 receptor knockout mice display reduced ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and increased striatal dopamine D2 receptors.

Cannabinoids and ethanol activate the same reward pathways, and recent advances in the understanding of the neurobiological basis of alcoholism suggest that the CB1 receptor system may play a key role in the reinforcing effects of ethanol and in modulating ethanol intake. In the present study, male CB1 receptors knockout mice generated on a CD1 background displayed decreased ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) compared to wild-type (CB1(+/+)) mice. Ethanol (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/kg) induced significant CPP in CB1(+/+) mice at all doses tested, whereas it induced significant CPP only at the highest dose of ethanol (2.0 g/kg) in CB1(-/-) mice. However, there was no genotypic difference in cocaine (20 mg/kg)-induced CPP. There was also no genotypic difference, neither in cocaine (10-50 mg/kg) nor in D-amphetamine (1.2-5 mg/kg)-induced locomotor effects. In addition, mutant and wild-type mice did not differ in sensitivity to the anxiolytic effects of ethanol (1.5 g/kg) when tested using the elevated plus maze. Interestingly, this decrease in ethanol efficacy to induce CPP in CB1(-/-) mice was correlated with an increase in D2/D3 receptors, as determined by [3H]raclopride binding, whereas there was no difference in D1-like receptors, as determined by [3H]SCH23390 binding, measured in the striatum from drug-naive mice. This increase in D2/D3 binding sites observed in CB1 knockout mice was associated with an altered locomotor response to the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole (low doses 0.02-0.1 mg/kg) but not to an alteration of quinpirole (0.1-1.0 mg/kg)-induced CPP compared to wild-type mice. Altogether, the present results indicate that lifelong deletion of CB1 receptors reduced ethanol-induced CPP and that these reduced rewarding effects of ethanol are correlated to an overexpression of striatal dopamine D2 receptors.     

Estrogen pretreatment modulates morphine-induced conditioned place preference in ovariectomized mice

Estrogen is known to modulate the neurotransmission in the brain. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effects of estrogen on the rewarding properties of morphine using conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm in adult female mice. The possible rewarding effect of estrogen was also examined in ovariectomized mice. Following a 6-day conditioning procedure, sham operated animals showed a significant preference towards the side previously paired with a range of morphine doses (2, 5 and 10—but not 20—mg/kg, SC). However, ovariectomized mice showed decreased CPP compared to gonadally intact mice with a right shift in their morphine dose-response curve. These effects were reversed by chronic daily administration of estradiol benzoate (EB; 20 µg/kg, SC). Furthermore, in ovariectomized mice, EB per se was able to induce CPP. In conclusion, our findings indicate that estradiol has a facilitating effect on morphine reward while its deficiency increases the threshold dose of morphine to induce CPP.     

Injection timing determines whether intragastric ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice

Previous studies have shown that mice develop conditioned place preference (CPP) when ethanol is administered by intraperitoneal (ip) or intravenous (iv) injection. The present studies examined CPP in mice using the intragastric (ig) route of administration. Inbred mice were surgically implanted with chronic intragastric cannulae and exposed to an unbiased place conditioning procedure in which infusion of ethanol (2 or 4 g/kg) was paired with a conditioned stimulus (CS+). A different CS was paired with water. In Experiments 1-2, ethanol was infused just before exposure to CS+. Contrary to previous studies involving intraperitoneal injection, infusion of 4 g/kg ig ethanol produced a significant conditioned place aversion (CPA). However, when a 5-min delay was inserted between infusion and CS exposure (Experiments 3-4), the same dose produced CPP. These outcomes are not consistent with expectations derived from a recent study in selectively bred rats, suggesting that sensitivity to ethanol reward is enhanced by intragastric administration. However, the finding that intragastric ethanol can produce either CPP or CPA depending on dose and injection timing is consistent with previous intraperitoneal ethanol studies in mice. Although the parameters differ for each route of administration, it appears that the same underlying processes can be invoked to explain how manipulation of injection timing affects the direction of ethanol-induced place conditioning. More specifically, in both cases, CPA can be attributed to an initial, short-lived aversive effect, whereas CPP can be attributed to a delayed rewarding effect of ethanol.     

Conditioned stimulus preference after acetaldehyde but not ethanol injections

Acetaldehyde, the first ethanol metabolite, has been suggested to mediate some of the behavioral effects of ethanol and particularly its reinforcing properties, although this later hypothesis remains extremely controversial. While several studies demonstrated the reinforcing effects of brain acetaldehyde, blood acetaldehyde accumulation is believed to be primarily aversive. In the present study, a conditioned reinforcement procedure has been used to investigate the reinforcing and/or aversive effects of intraperitoneal injections of both acetaldehyde and ethanol in Wistar rats. An olfactory stimulus was paired with daily injections of either ethanol (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 g/kg) or acetaldehyde (0, 10, 20, 100 and 150 mg/kg). After eight conditioning sessions, all rats were tested for their stimulus preference or aversion. The results show that conditioning with small, 0.25 and 0.5 g/kg, ethanol doses induced neither preference nor aversion for the olfactory cue. In contrast, higher ethanol doses (1.0 and 2.0 g/kg) resulted in significant stimulus aversions. Acetaldehyde conditioning led to a biphasic stimulus preference, with a maximal preference around 20 mg/kg acetaldehyde. No evidence of aversive effects was found with increasing doses of acetaldehyde, even with concentrations close to the lethal limit. The present study clearly shows that systemic acetaldehyde injections induced significant stimulus preferences. This suggests that acetaldehyde may be, at least in part, responsible for the reinforcing effects of alcohol intake.     

Alcohol place preference conditioning in high- and low-alcohol preferring selected lines of mice.

High- and low-alcohol preferring (HAP and LAP) selected lines of mice diverge greatly in free-choice alcohol consumption. This study investigated whether the lines differ in a measure of alcohol reward not dependent on drinking, specifically place conditioning. Mice were subjected to a differential conditioning procedure in which four alcohol-paired CS+ trials on one floor cue (0, 1.5, 3, or 4 g/kg; ns=20-24) alternated with four saline-paired CS- trials on a different floor cue. Testing was on a split floor, half CS+ and half CS-. HAP and LAP mice showed no preference at 0 g/kg, and equivalent, moderate preference at 1.5 and 3 g/kg alcohol. At 4 g/kg, LAP, but not HAP mice showed an increase in preference. The present findings imply greater efficacy of alcohol preference conditioning in LAP mice, but do not speak for line differences in sensitivity. Results do not support the hypothesis that selection for high drinking yields greater efficacy of alcohol as a reinforcer when reward is measured using a technique that does not rely on drinking. Low drinking in LAP mice may emerge from innate taste avoidance of alcohol as a result of selective breeding for low preference, which prevents them from encountering alcohol's rewarding, pharmacological effects.     

Effect of Ro 15-4513 on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference.

The benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist Ro 15-4513 reverses a number of ethanol's effects, including its reinforcing properties as measured through self-administration. The present study examined the effect of this putative ethanol antagonist in a place conditioning design that has been shown to be sensitive to ethanol's rewarding properties in mice. Using an unbiased differential conditioning procedure, DBA/2J mice received, on alternate days, pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) with either ethanol (2 g/kg), Ro 15-4513 (3 mg/kg), or a combination of ethanol and Ro 15-4513. On alternate days, a different distinctive floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with vehicle. Under these conditions, ethanol produced a conditioned place preference that was unaffected by Ro 15-4513. Ro 15-4513 alone did not produce either a place preference or aversion. Ro 15-4513 did produce reductions in locomotor activity during conditioning, indicating it was behaviorally active. These results indicate that a dose of Ro 15-4513 that alters general activity does not affect ethanol reward.     

Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice

RATIONALE: Although the distinction between "biased" and "unbiased" is generally recognized as an important methodological issue in place conditioning, previous studies have not adequately addressed the distinction between a biased/unbiased apparatus and a biased/unbiased stimulus assignment procedure. Moreover, a review of the recent literature indicates that many reports (70% of 76 papers published in 2001) fail to provide adequate information about apparatus bias. This issue is important because the mechanisms underlying a drug's effect in the place-conditioning procedure may differ depending on whether the apparatus is biased or unbiased. OBJECTIVES: The present studies were designed to assess the impact of apparatus bias and stimulus assignment procedure on ethanol-induced place conditioning in mice (DBA/2 J). A secondary goal was to compare various dependent variables commonly used to index conditioned place preference. METHODS: Apparatus bias was manipulated by varying the combination of tactile (floor) cues available during preference tests. Experiment 1 used an unbiased apparatus in which the stimulus alternatives were equally preferred during a pre-test as indicated by the group average. Experiment 2 used a biased apparatus in which one of the stimuli was strongly preferred by most mice (mean % time on cue = 67%) during the pre-test. In both studies, the stimulus paired with drug (CS+) was assigned randomly (i.e., an "unbiased" stimulus assignment procedure). Experimental mice received four pairings of CS+ with ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.) and four pairings of the alternative stimulus (CS-) with saline; control mice received saline on both types of trial. Each experiment concluded with a 60-min choice test. RESULTS: With the unbiased apparatus (experiment 1), significant place conditioning was obtained regardless of whether drug was paired with the subject's initially preferred or non-preferred stimulus. However, with the biased apparatus (experiment 2), place conditioning was apparent only when ethanol was paired with the initially non-preferred cue, and not when it was paired with the initially preferred cue. These conclusions held regardless of which dependent variable was used to index place conditioning, but only if the counterbalancing factor was included in statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS:These studies indicate that apparatus bias plays a major role in determining whether biased assignment of an ethanol-paired stimulus affects ability to demonstrate conditioned place preference. Ethanol's ability to produce conditioned place preference in an unbiased apparatus, regardless of the direction of the initial cue bias, supports previous studies that interpret such findings as evidence of a primary rewarding drug effect. Moreover, these studies suggest that the asymmetrical outcome observed in the biased apparatus is most likely due to a measurement problem (e.g., ceiling effect) rather than to an interaction between the drug's effect and an unconditioned motivational response (e.g., "anxiety") to the initially non-preferred stimulus. More generally, these findings illustrate the importance of providing clear information on apparatus bias in all place-conditioning studies.     

Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect,sensitization to activating effect,but no change in rewarding effect

RATIONALE: The literature offers many examples of tolerance to ethanol's inhibitory/depressant effects and sensitization to its activating effects. There are also many examples of tolerance to ethanol's aversive effects as measured in the conditioned taste aversion and conditioned place aversion (CPA) procedures. However, there are very few demonstrations of either tolerance or sensitization to ethanol's rewarding or reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: The present studies were designed to examine effects of two forms of ethanol pre-exposure (distal or proximal) on ethanol's rewarding and aversive effects as indexed by the place conditioning procedure. METHOD: Male inbred (DBA/2J) mice were exposed to ethanol (2 g/kg IP) in an unbiased place conditioning procedure that normally produces either conditioned place preference (CPP) (ethanol injection before CS exposure) or CPA (ethanol injection after CS exposure). In the distal pre-exposure studies (experiments 1 and 2), mice initially received a series of four ethanol injections (0, 2, or 4 g/kg) in the home cage at 48-h intervals during the week before place conditioning. In the proximal pre-exposure studies (experiments 3-4), mice were injected with ethanol 65 min before (experimental groups) or 65 min after (control groups) each paired ethanol injection on CS+ trials. RESULTS: Distal pre-exposure produced a robust sensitization to ethanol's activating effect, whereas proximal pre-exposure generally reduced the activation normally produced by the paired ethanol injection. Both forms of pre-exposure interfered with CPA, but had no effect on CPP. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that both forms of pre-exposure reduced ethanol's aversive effect, but had no impact on ethanol's rewarding effect. In general, the detrimental effects of pre-exposure on CPA are explained best in terms of a reduction in ethanol's efficacy as an aversive unconditioned stimulus (i.e. tolerance), although explanations based on other types of associative interference are also possible. The failure to affect CPP with pre-exposure treatments that reduced or eliminated CPA suggests that these behaviors are mediated by independent, motivationally opposite effects of ethanol. Moreover, these results indicate dissociation between sensitization to ethanol's locomotor activating effect and changes in its rewarding effect. To the extent that motivational processes measured by CPP and CPA normally contribute to ethanol drinking, the present findings suggest that increases in ethanol intake seen after chronic ethanol exposure are more likely caused by tolerance to ethanol's aversive effect rather than sensitization to its rewarding or reinforcing effect.     

Ethanol discrimination in the rat: lack of modulation by restraint stress and memantine

There is a large body of experimental evidence that both stress and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists may alter acute behavioural effects of ethanol. Notably, an uncompetitive, low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonist, memantine, has been recently claimed to possess anti-craving properties in rats with a long-term history of ethanol consumption. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of restraint stress and memantine on the dose-response curve of ethanol discrimination. Rats were trained to discriminate 1 g/kg ethanol from saline in the two-lever drug discrimination procedure. When ethanol discrimination was acquired, the subjects were exposed to 30-min sessions of acute restraint stress, and different doses of ethanol (0.25, 0.5 or 1 g/kg) or saline were administered. In subsequent experiments the effects of memantine (2.25 or 4.5 mg/kg) on the cueing effects of ethanol were tested. Neither the stress sessions nor memantine influenced the ethanol discrimination dose-response curve. Moreover, the stress did not alter the rate of responding. However, both doses of memantine tended to increase the rate of responding when given in combination with lower doses of ethanol (0.25–0.5 g/kg). In contrast, 4.5 mg/kg memantine decreased the response rate when combined with 1 g/kg ethanol. These results suggest that: (1) pre-exposure to acute restraint stress or memantine does not affect the dose-response curve of ethanol discrimination; (2) memantine given in combination with low doses of ethanol may stimulate operant behaviour in the food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. Received: 2 March 1998 / Accepted: 11 November 1998     

Nicotine induces conditioned place preferences over a large range of doses in rats

Rationale Conditioned place preference (CPP) procedures provide one measure of potential rewarding effects of abused drugs. Many attempts to induce CPP with nicotine have been unsuccessful.Objectives To assess the influence of nicotine dose and stimulus assignment procedure on development of nicotine-induced CPP.Methods Initial preferences for one side of a two-compartment apparatus were first determined in Sprague–Dawley rats. In subsequent conditioning trials, the compartment paired with nicotine was the initially preferred side for half of the rats, and the initially non-preferred side for the other half. Rats received either an injection of nicotine (0.01–2 mg/kg SC) before being placed in one compartment (three trials) or saline before being placed in the other compartment (three trials). Control rats had saline injections associated with both compartments. A final test trial with no injection assessed final place preference.Results Significant CPP were induced by 0.1–1.4 mg/kg doses of nicotine. Nicotine-induced CPP were only apparent when nicotine was paired with the initially non-preferred side. Moreover, a very high dose of nicotine (2 mg/kg) induced conditioned place aversion when paired with the initially preferred side of the apparatus.Conclusions Nicotine induced significant CPP across a wide range of doses, in accordance with its role as the primary addictive component of tobacco. Small preferences for one side of the apparatus played a major role in the development of nicotine-induced CPP. These findings suggest that biased procedures may be more suitable than unbiased procedures for evaluation of rewarding effects of nicotine using CPP paradigms.     

Extended blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine with low doses of ethanol

The aim of the present study was to further evaluate effects of ethanol on nicotine discrimination and to correlate these effects with blood ethanol levels. Rats were trained to discriminate 0.3 mg/kg nicotine from its vehicle in the standard two-lever operant procedure. In antagonism tests, small doses of ethanol (0.25-0.5 g/kg) were injected either 5 or 50 min before nicotine. Both doses of ethanol partially antagonized the nicotine cue regardless of the pre-treatment time. Ethanol attenuated also inhibitory effects of nicotine on the rate of responding. Suppression of the cueing effects of nicotine was noted even 60 min after the injection of 0.25 g/kg ethanol, i.e. at the time point when the blood ethanol level was close to zero. Ethanol-induced antagonism of the nicotine cue disappeared when longer time (110 min) was allowed to elapse between the ethanol (0.5 g/kg) and nicotine injection. Concluding, the present results may indicate that the effects of ethanol on nicotine discrimination are not primarily related to blood ethanol levels.     

Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences

Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation has been proposed to be positively correlated with the rewarding effects of ethanol (Wise and Bozarth 1987). The present experiments provided a test of this hypothesis using a genetic model. Three behavioral indices of the motivational effects of ethanol (drinking, taste conditioning, place conditioning) were examined in mice from two independent FAST lines, selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and mice from two independent SLOW lines, selectively bred for insensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. In a single-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to drinking tubes containing ethanol in a concentration (1–12% v/v) that increased over 24 consecutive days. FAST mice consumed greater amounts of ethanol solution. In a two-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to tubes containing water or various concentrations of ethanol (2–8% v/v) over 6 days. FAST mice generally showed greater preference for ethanol solutions than SLOW mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, mice received access to saccharin solution followed by injection of 2.5 g/kg ethanol (IP). SLOW mice developed aversion to the saccharin flavor more readily than FAST mice. In a series of place conditioning experiments, tactile stimuli were paired with various doses of ethanol (0.8–2.0 g/kg). During conditioning, FAST mice showed locomotor stimulation after 1.0, 1.2 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol while SLOW mice did not. During testing, mice conditioned with 1.2 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg ethanol showed conditioned place preference, but there were no line differences in magnitude of preference. These results indicate that genetic selection for sensitivity to ethanol-stimulated activity has resulted in genetic differences in ethanol drinking and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion but not ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Overall, these data provide mixed support for the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.     

Acquisition and expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice is inhibited by naloxone

The effects of opioid antagonists on conditioned reward produced by ethanol provide variable and sometimes conflicting results, especially in mice. In the present set of experiments, male C57BL/6 mice received 4 vehicle and 4 ethanol conditionings, and the rewarding effects of ethanol were assessed in an unbiased version of the conditioned place preference (CPP) apparatus and an unbiased stimulus assignment procedure. Intraperitoneal (ip) administration of ethanol (2 g/kg, but not 1 g/kg) resulted in the conditioned reward when conditionings lasted for 6 min but not when conditioning lasted for 20 min. Administration of the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 and 5 mg/kg) before the conditionings attenuated the acquisition of ethanol-induced place preference. Naloxone (1 mg/kg) also inhibited expression of the CPP response, but it did not alter the preference of vehicle-conditioned mice, suggesting the lack of its own motivational effects in this experimental setting. Taken together, the present results suggest that an unbiased version of ethanol-induced CPP in C57BL/6 mice could be a valid model for the study of the motivational effects of ethanol, confirming and expanding previous findings that have demonstrated inhibitory effects of opioid receptor antagonist on alcohol conditioned reward.     

Antagonism of caffeine-induced convulsions by ethanol and dizocilpine (MK-801) in mice

Ethanol (1 and 2 g/kg, i.p.) and MK-801 (1 mg/kg, i.p.), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, offered protection against caffeine-induced convulsions in mice. Subeffective doses of ethanol (0.5-g/kg, i.p.) and MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) when administered concurrently, did not provide a facilitatory anticonvulsant action against caffeine-induced convulsions. Ethanol (0.5 g/kg, i.p.) when administered concurrently with adenosine (100 mg/kg, i.p.) or dipyridamole (5 mg/kg, i.p.) elicited a facilitatory anticonvulsant action. However, concurrent administration of subeffective doses of MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) with adenosine (100 mg/kg, i.p.) did not offer a facilitatory anticonvulsant action against caffeine-induced convulsions. The protective effect of ethanol (1 g/kg, i.p.) against caffeine-induced convulsions was reversed by an imidazobenzodiazepine, Ro 15-4513 (4 mg/kg, i.p.). Ro 15-4513 did not produce any proconvulsant effect with caffeine. It is suggested that ethanol and MK-801 elicit their anticonvulsant actions against caffeine-induced convulsions through different receptor mechanisms and that the anticonvulsant action of ethanol may be partly attributed to its ability to act via central adenosinergic mechanisms.     

Juvenile ethanol exposure increases rewarding properties of cocaine and morphine in adult DBA/2J mice

Convergent data showed that ethanol exposure during adolescence can alter durably ethanol-related behaviour at adulthood. However, the consequences of juvenile ethanol exposure on the reinforcing effects of other drugs of abuse remain unclear. In the present work, we evaluated in adult male DBA/2J mice the effects of early ethanol exposure on the sensitivity to the incentive effects of cocaine and morphine, and on extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation in response to cocaine. Juvenile male mice received intragastric administration of ethanol (2×2.5 g/kg/day) or water for 5 days starting on postnatal day 28. When reaching adult age (10 week-old), animals were subjected to an unbiased procedure to assess conditioned place preference (CPP) to cocaine or morphine. In addition, activation of ERK in response to an acute injection of cocaine was investigated using immunoblotting in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens. Mice that have been subjected to early ethanol exposure developed CPP to doses of cocaine (5 mg/kg) or morphine (10 mg/kg) below the threshold doses to induce CPP in water pre-exposed mice. In addition, early ethanol administration significantly increased striatal ERK phosphorylation normally induced by acute cocaine (10 and 20 mg/kg) in adult mice. These results show that, in DBA/2J mice, early exposure to ethanol enhanced the perception of the incentive effects of cocaine and morphine. Ethanol pre-exposure also induced a positive modulation of striatal ERK signalling, in line with the inference that juvenile ethanol intake may contribute to the development of addictive behaviour at adult age.