Herbal medicines for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Limitations in the conventional medical management of osteoarthritis indicate a real need for safe and effective treatment of osteoarthritis patients. Herbal medicines may provide a solution to this problem. The aim of this article was to review systematically all randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of herbal medicines in the treatment of osteoarthritis. METHODS: Computerized literature searches were carried out on five electronic databases. Trial data were extracted in a standardized, predefined manner and assessed independently. RESULTS: Twelve trials and two systematic reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors found promising evidence for the effective use of some herbal preparations in the treatment of osteoarthritis. In addition, evidence suggesting that some herbal preparations reduce consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was found. The reviewed herbal medicines appear relatively safe. CONCLUSIONS: Some herbal medicines may offer a much-needed alternative for patients with osteoarthritis.     

Herbal medicines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: With the growing interest in herbal therapies among persons with rheumatoid arthritis, there exists a need for investigation into their safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to examine the evidence for the use of herbal medicines for RA based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS: A computerized search of eight electronic databases and the bibliographies of identified articles resulted in 14 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Two raters independently extracted data and rated the trials for quality. RESULTS: There is moderate support for gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), which is found in some herbal medicines, for reducing pain, tender joint count and stiffness. For other herbal medicines there was only a single RCT available, resulting in weak evidence. In general, herbal preparations were relatively safe to use. CONCLUSIONS: Given the number of herbal medicines promoted for RA, further research is needed to examine their efficacy, safety and potential drug interactions.     

Herbal treatments of asthma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a condition, often chronic, characterized by respiratory symptoms, variable airflow limitation and/or airway hyper-reactivity with symptoms causally related to family history, environmental influences, exposure to viruses and allergens as examples. The high economic burden associated with asthma is associated primarily with health care costs, missed work or school days. This systematic review was conducted to determine the study quality of articles investigating ayurvedic/collateral herbs, the effectiveness/efficacy and safety profile, as reported in the studies. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Mantis, Ovid, Annotated Bibliography of Indian Medicine, and Cochrane library to identify published trials on herbal medicines for asthma of which Ayruvedic herbals are a subset. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Quasi-Experimental Designs (QEDs) were included in this systematic review. The classic Jadad Scale, Singh RCT Scale with additional domains than Jadad, Safety Scoring Scale for clinical trials and the Singh QED Scale based on expanded features of QEDs were used to assess study quality. Herbs included in Traditional Chinese Medicine were excluded from this review. Forty-two articles were retrieved and 37 studies were ultimately reviewed utilizing 3 independent evaluators/1 arbitrator. RESULTS: Articles reviewed indicated benefit from most of the herbs used either as a primary or adjunctive treatment for Asthma. Study quality was mixed and therefore caution in interpretation of findings of usefulness of these herbals must be suggested. Limited safety information was mixed and generally was related to GI symptoms, though one herbal investigated reported more serious side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Herbs may be useful in treatment of asthma. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for or against the use of these herbals. Established effectiveness must be balanced with study quality and safety profile for the herb.     

Herbal medicines for the prevention and treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Despite the rapid advances in medical technology, including endovascular interventions and medications, cerebral vasospasm (CVS) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is still one of the major threats to the lives of patients with SAH. In East Asian countries, various types of herbal medicines have been used to treat cerebrovascular diseases, including SAH. In this review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of herbal medicines for the prevention and treatment of CVS after SAH.Methods and analysis:Seven databases will be searched for relevant studies from inception to the present date “June 2020”. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess the effect and safety of herbal medicines for the prevention and treatment of CVS after SAH will be included. The methodological quality will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. After selecting the appropriate studies, a meta-analysis of the RCTs will be performed.Results:This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of herbal medicines for CVS after SAH.Conclusion:Our systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether herbal medicines are effective interventions for patients with CVS after SAH.Ethics and dissemination:Ethical approval is not required, as this study is based on a review of published research. This review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print.Trial registration number:Research registry reviewregistry923.     

Herbal medicines for the management of irritable bowel syndrome: a comprehensive review

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gut disorder with high prevalence. Because of various factors involved in its pathophysiology and disappointing results from conventional IBS medications, the treatment of IBS is challenging and use of complementary and alternative medicines especially herbal therapies is increasing. In this paper, electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library were searched to obtain any in vitro, in vivo or human studies evaluating single or compound herbal preparations in the management of IBS. One in vitro, 3 in vivo and 23 human studies were included and systematically reviewed. The majority of studies are about essential oil of Menta piperita as a single preparation and STW 5 as a compound preparation. Some evaluated herbs such as Curcuma xanthorriza and Fumaria officinalis did not demonstrate any benefits in IBS. However, it seems there are many other herbal preparations such as those proposed in traditional medicine of different countries that could be studied and investigated for their efficacy in management of IBS.     

Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to quantify the global prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by means of a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis. PubMed was searched for population-based prevalence estimates published during the period 1990-2004. Articles were included if they: 1) provided total population or sex-specific estimates for COPD, chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema; and 2) gave method details sufficiently clearly to establish the sampling strategy, approach to diagnosis and diagnostic criteria. Of 67 accepted articles, 62 unique entries yielded 101 overall prevalence estimates from 28 different counties. The pooled prevalence of COPD was 7.6% from 37 studies, of chronic bronchitis alone (38 studies) was 6.4% and of emphysema alone (eight studies) was 1.8%. The pooled prevalence from 26 spirometric estimates was 8.9%. The most common spirometric definitions used were those of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (13 estimates). There was significant heterogeneity, which was incompletely explained by subgroup analysis (e.g. age and smoking status). The prevalence of physiologically defined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults aged > or =40 yrs is approximately 9-10%. There are important regional gaps, and methodological differences hinder interpretation of the available data. The efforts of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and similar groups should help to standardise chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence measurement.     

Effectiveness and safety of herbal medicines in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome： A systematic review

AIM： To explore the efficacy and safety of herba medicines （HM） in the treatment of irritable bowe syndrome （IBS）. METHODS： A computer-based as well as manual literature search was performed. We reviewed randomized controlled trials on the treatment of IBS with and without HM. RESULTS： A total of 22 studies with 25 HMs met the inclusion criteria. Four of these studies were of good quality, while the remaining 18 studies involving 17 Chinese herbal medicine （CHM） formulas were of poor quality. Eight of these reports using 9 HMs showed global improvement of IBS symptoms, 4 studies with 3 HMs were efficacious in diarrhea-predominant IBS, and 2 studies with 2 HMs showed improvement in constipation- predominant IBS. Out of a total of 1279 patients, 15 adverse events in 47 subjects were reported with HM. No serious adverse events or abnormal laboratory tests were observed. The incidence of the adverse events was low （2.97%; 95% CI： 2.04%-3.90%）. CONCLUSION： Herbal medicines have therapeutic benefit in IBS, and adverse events are seldom reported in literature. Nevertheless, herbal medicines should be used with caution. It is necessary to conduct rigorous, well-designed clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and safety in the treatment of IBS.     

Peripheral muscle strength training in COPD: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle weakness, and the associated impact on exercise tolerance, provides a strong theoretical rationale for strength training intervention for people with COPD.Aim: The purpose of this review was to examine systematically the current evidence for peripheral muscle strength training in people with COPD. METHOD: Empirical trials and reviews relating to strength training in COPD were obtained by searching electronic databases and citation tracking, using the keywords of COPD with strength/resistance training and skeletal muscle. Two reviewers completed data extraction and quality assessment independently, using the PEDro (physiotherapy evidence database) scale and a checklist for review articles. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were determined for empiric trials and metaanalysis used where appropriate. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 13 articles (9 empirical trials and 4 reviews). Strength training was found to have strong evidence for improving upper body and leg strength. However, no strong evidence for strength training was found for other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is required to investigate the effects of strength training on functional activities, such as balance, upper limb function, self care, and participation in daily life.     

Herbal medicine for adults with asthma: A systematic review

Background: Many people with asthma use herbal medicines to help reduce symptoms and improve asthma control. Objective: To update the systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of herbal medicine for adult asthma. Data Sources: Nine English and Chinese databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, AMED, CBM, CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang). Study Selections: Herbal medicines combined with routine pharmacotherapies compared with the same pharmacotherapies alone or placebo. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE Summary of Findings tables were used to evaluate methodological quality. Results: Twenty-nine (29) studies involving 3,001 participants were included. Herbal interventions used multi-ingredients such as licorice root, crow-dipper, astragali, and angelica. Compared with routine pharmacotherapies alone, herbal medicines as add-on therapy improved lung function (FEV1: MD 7.81%, 95% CI 5.79, 9.83, I² = 63%; PEFR: MD 65.14 L/min, 95% CI 58.87, 71.41, I² = 21%); asthma control (MD 2.47 points, 95% CI 1.64, 3.29, I² = 55%); reduced salbutamol usage (MD ?1.14 puffs/day, 95% CI ?2.20, ?0.09, I² = 92%); and reduced acute asthma exacerbations over one year (MD ?1.20, 95% CI ?1.82, ?0.58, one study). Compared with placebo plus pharmacotherapies herbal medicines as add-on therapy improved lung function (FEV1: MD 15.83%, 95% CI 13.54, 18.12 and PEFR: MD 55.20 L/min, 95% CI 33.41, 76.99). Other outcomes were not reported in these placebo studies. Included studies were low to moderate quality. Adverse events were rare. Conclusions: Herbal medicines combined with routine pharmacotherapies improved asthma outcomes greater than pharmacotherapies alone. Included studies did not blind participants therefore more studies that address such weaknesses are warranted.     

Herbal medicine for the prevention of sarcopenia: A protocol for systematic review

Background:Sarcopenia is a syndrome characterized by a gradual and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength leading to physical disability, poor quality of life, and possible death. The disease impacts the steadily increasing aging population worldwide. In this systematic review protocol, we aim to investigate the effects and safety of herbal medicines on skeletal muscle health, specifically focusing on possible treatments for preventing sarcopenia.Methods:Nine electronic databases will be comprehensively searched from inception to the present date. Clinical studies reporting on the effects and safety of herbal medicines associated with skeletal muscle health and the prevention of sarcopenia will be included. The primary outcome will be determined by five categories: anti-inflammatory and antioxidant efficacy, muscle damage prevention, anti-fatigue effect, muscle-atrophy prevention, and muscle regeneration and differentiation. Two independent researchers will perform the research selection, data extraction, and quality assessment processes. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be used to assess the methodological quality and design of the included studies. We will place no restrictions on publication status or language, and the results of the systematic review will be disseminated electronically and in print by publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Results:The present study will evaluate the effects and safety of herbal medicines for the prevention of sarcopenia.Conclusion:Our findings will provide guidance on the use of herbal medicines to prevent sarcopenia. This knowledge is valuable for elderly people, clinicians treating patients with sarcopenia, policy makers, and researchers.Registration number:Reviewregistry1113 (URL: https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analyses/registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analysesdetails/604a1e5ef176d2001b557750/).     

Chiropractic treatment for fibromyalgia: a systematic review

Many patients use chiropractic as a treatment of fibromyalgia, and many chiropractors seem to be convinced that it is effective for that condition. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review of randomised clinical trials testing the effectiveness of chiropractic care for fibromyalgia. Six electronic literature searches were conducted. No language restrictions were applied. Data extraction and validation were carried out by two independent reviewers. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Their methodological quality was poor. They generated no evidence to suggest that chiropractic care is effective for fibromyalgia. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that chiropractic is an effective treatment for fibromyalgia.     

Evaluating the Clinical COPD Questionnaire: A systematic review

The Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) is recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) to evaluate health status in patients with COPD. The objective of this work was to systemically assess the reliability, validity, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the CCQ. A structured search was conducted in three databases to identify articles that evaluated the psychometric properties of the CCQ in individuals with COPD. Two investigators screened the title, abstract and full text of the articles to determine study eligibility and performed the data extraction. Quality assessment of included studies was assessed by the COSMIN (Consensus‐Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) checklist. Finally, 43 studies were included, over half of which had fair methodological quality. Internal consistency (reliability) of the CCQ total score ranged from 0.84 to 0.94, and test‐retest reliability was 0.70–0.99. The overall CCQ had a better correlation with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; from 0.71 to 0.88) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT; from 0.64 to 0.88) than modified Medical Research Council (mMRC; from 0.392 to 0.668) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁% predicted; from ?0.31 to ?0.68). Scores were different within GOLD stages, groups, composite events and co‐morbidities. CCQ was sensitive to exacerbations, pulmonary rehabilitation and smoking cessation with the MCID of 0.4. The CCQ is a very useful and practical tool that can be used in clinical populations with good reliability, validity and responsiveness to interventions.     

Herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Herbal medicines are empirically used to treat cervicogenic dizziness. However, till date there have been no systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these medicines. Therefore, this study protocol describes the methods for evaluating the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness.Methods and analysis:The following electronic academic databases will be searched up to December 2019 without language or publication status restrictions: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), together with Korean, Chinese, and Japanese databases. Any randomized controlled trials related to herbal medicine for cervicogenic dizziness will be included. The functional outcomes and the vertebrobasilar artery hemodynamic states will be evaluated as primary outcomes. The total effective rate, hematological conditions, and adverse events will be assessed as secondary outcomes. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment of studies, and qualitative evaluation of clinical evidence will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies will be evaluated using a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The strength of evidence from the included data will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Data synthesis will be performed as either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model using Review Manager software version 5.3. The results will be reported as a risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes and as a mean difference or standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes.Ethics and dissemination:No ethical approval is required since the individual clinical information of the patient is not used. The findings of this systematic review will be disseminated through the peer-reviewed publications or conference presentations.Review Registry Unique Identifying Number:reviewregistry1036.     

Misuse of medicines in the European union: a systematic review of the literature

Background: Although awareness of the misuse of medicines is increasing, data on the extent of the problem in the European Union (EU) are lacking. Methods: In order to assess the magnitude and severity of the problem, a systematic review of the literature on the misuse of analgesics, opioid substitution medicines and sedatives/hypnotics (with the exception of benzodiazepines) was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Relevant literature was identified between 2001 and 2011. Results: The main groups of misused medicines include opioid analgesics, methadone, buprenorphine and Z-drugs. Regional trends in medicine misuse indicate heterogeneity across the EU with respect to misused medicine types and research activities. Prevalence, high-risk populations and factors contributing to medicine misuse are discussed. Conclusion: The implications of these findings for prevention, treatment, and policy in the EU are considered.     

Safety of long-acting beta-agonists in stable COPD: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Some studies have suggested that use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) leads to an increased risk for adverse events in patients with stable COPD. The purpose of this review was to assess the safety, and secondarily the efficacy of LABAs. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review with metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials (> or = 1 month in duration) in the published literature that have compared LABAs with placebo or anticholinergics in stable poorly reversible and reversible COPD. RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched to identify 27 studies. LABAs reduced severe exacerbations compared with placebo (relative risk [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.91). There was no significant difference between LABA and placebo groups in terms of respiratory deaths (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.64). Use of LABAs with inhaled corticosteroids reduced the risk of respiratory death compared with LABAs alone (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.93). Patients receiving LABAs showed significant benefits in airflow limitation measures, health-related quality of life, and use of rescue medication. Finally, tiotropium decreased the incidence of severe COPD exacerbations compared with LABAs (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.87). CONCLUSION: This review supports the beneficial effects of the use of LABAs in patients with stable moderate-to-severe COPD, and did not confirm previous data about an increased risk for respiratory deaths. Also, our analysis suggests the superiority of tiotropium over LABAs for the treatment of stable COPD patients.     

中医药治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎的系统评价

目的:系统评价中医药与西医治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎的疗效与安全性.方法:检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、OVID数据库和中国期刊网中与维普中文科技期刊全文数据库的英文和中文随机对照试验(RCT)文献,将Jadad积分≥3分高质量文章纳入研究,并提取纳入研究的特征信息.数据分析采用Revman软件,检验异质性,并根据异质性结果选择相应的效应模型.最后绘制漏斗图及Egger回归方程评定有无发表偏倚.结果:8项RCT,804例患者入选.与对照组相比,中医药组的总显效率(OR=4.17,95%CI:2.32-7.52)、总有效率(OR=5.79,95%CI:4.09-8.21)、病理学改善:萎缩(OR=5.06,95%CI:2.83-9.08)、肠化(OR=5.67,95%CI:2.74-11.73)、不典型增生(OR=4.72,95%CI:1.93-11.51)、不良反应发生方面(OR=0.20,95%CI:0.09-0.47),差异具统计学意义(均P<0.05).在中、西医治疗H.pylori方面,两组无统计学差异(OR=5.56,95%CI:0.55-56.67).中医药组与对照组在CAG治疗中总显效率、总有效率、H.pylori转阴率、病理改善情况(萎缩、肠化、不典型增生)的漏斗图均基本呈现下宽上窄左右对称的图形,线性回归常数项检验统计量表明无发表偏倚,P值分别为0.781、0.791、0.702、0.645、0.593及0.779.结论:中医药组对CAG的总显效率、总有效率、病理学改善等方面明显优于西医组,同时在不良反应发生率方面,中医药组明显低于西医组.     

Adulteration of Chinese herbal medicines with synthetic drugs: a systematic review

The popularity of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) demands a critical analysis of safety issues. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize data regarding adulterations of CHMs with conventional drugs. Literature searches were carried out in six databases. Articles containing original data on adulterations were considered without language restrictions. Eighteen case reports, two case series and four analytical investigations were identified. The list of adulterants contains drugs associated with serious adverse effects like corticosteroids. In several instances, patients were seriously harmed. One report from Taiwan suggests that 24% of all samples were contaminated with at least one conventional pharmacological compound. It is concluded that adulteration of CHMs with synthetic drugs is a potentially serious problem which needs to be addressed by adequate regulatory measures.     

Cardiovascular adverse effects of herbal medicines: a systematic review of the recent literature

Herbal medicines are popular but health care professionals often feel uncertain about their risks. This article summarizes recent evidence regarding the serious or potentially serious cardiovascular adverse effects of herbal medicines. Five electronic literature databases were searched. The evidence found was mostly anecdotal. Case reports and case series indicate that life-threatening adverse effects of herbal medicines occur. Potentially serious adverse effects are arrhythmias, arteritis, cardiac glycosides overdose, chest pain, congestive heart failure, hypertension, hypotension, myocardial infarction, over-anticoagulation, pericarditis and death. The problems relate to toxic herbal ingredients, adulteration and contamination of herbal medicinal products, and herb-drug interactions. Herbal medicines that have been implicated repeatedly include aconite, ephedra and licorice. Because of the anecdotal nature of the evidence, it is impossible to estimate the incidence of adverse effects. In conclusion, herbal medicinal products are regularly associated with serious cardiovascular adverse events but the size of this problem cannot be estimated at present. Vigilance and research seem to be the best way forward.