Evaluation of Versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is a tool used to optimize antiviral treatment regimens. The newly developed Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 uses sequence information from both the 5' untranslated region and the core region, allowing distinction between HCV genotype 1 and subtypes c to l of genotype 6 and between subtypes a and b of genotype 1. HCV-positive samples were genotyped manually using the Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 system according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the comparison study, Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0 was used. In this study, 99.7% of the samples could be amplified, the genotype of 96.0% of samples could be determined, and the agreement with the reference method was 99.4% when a genotype was determined. The reproducibility study showed no significant differences in performance across sites (P = 0.43) or across lots (P = 0.88). In the comparison study, 13 samples that were uninterpretable or incorrectly genotyped with Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0 were correctly genotyped by Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0. Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 is a sensitive, accurate, and reliable assay for HCV genotyping. The inclusion of the core region probes in Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 results in a genotyping success rate higher than that of the current Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0.     

Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6

The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (line probe assay [LiPA] 2.0), based on reverse hybridization, and the Abbott Realtime HCV genotype II assay (Realtime II), based on genotype-specific real-time PCR, have been widely used to analyze hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, their performances for detecting HCV genotype 6 infections have not been well studied. Here, we analyzed genotype 6 in 63 samples from the China HCV Genotyping Study that were originally identified as genotype 6 using the LiPA 2.0. The genotyping results were confirmed by nonstructural 5B (NS5B) or core sequence phylogenetic analysis. A total of 57 samples were confirmed to be genotype 6 (51 genotype 6a, 5 genotype 6n, and 1 genotype 6e). Four samples identified as a mixture of genotypes 6 and 4 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 3b. The remaining two samples classified as genotype 6 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 1b, which were intergenotypic recombinants and excluded from further comparison. In 57 genotype 6 samples detected using the Realtime II version 2.00 assay, 47 genotype 6a samples were identified as genotype 6, one 6e sample was misclassified as genotype 1, and four 6a and five 6n samples yielded indeterminate results. Nine nucleotide profiles in the 5′ untranslated region affected the performances of both assays. Therefore, our analysis shows that both assays have limitations in identifying HCV genotype 6. The LiPA 2.0 cannot distinguish some 3b samples from genotype 6 samples. The Realtime II assay fails to identify some 6a and all non-6a subtypes, and it misclassifies genotype 6e as genotype 1.     

Evaluation of a new-generation line-probe assay that detects 5' untranslated and core regions to genotype and subtype hepatitis C virus

The VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA 2.0; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium; distributed by Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) is a new-generation line-probe assay that simultaneously detects sequences in the 5' untranslated (5'UTR) and core regions to genotype and subtype hepatitis C virus (HCV). We tested 60 specimens of known genotype and subtype and 2 specimens with mixed infections with the LiPA 2.0 assay. After arbitration based on genotype and subtype determined by sequencing, there was concordance in 58 of 60 specimens (specificity, 96.7%). Computer-assisted typing yielded comparable results, but much more rapidly. Of 67 clinical specimens, 64 readily yielded genotype and subtype; 3 indeterminate specimens were typed by sequencing and were uncommon types not in the database. The newgeneration line-probe assay that detects the 5'UTR and core regions to genotype and subtype HCV is applicable to more than 95% of specimens. Interpretation is facilitated by computer-assisted analysis.     

Improvement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination with the new version of the INNO-LiPA HCV assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates have been classified into six main genotypes. Genotyping methods, and especially the widely used line probe assay (LiPA), are frequently based on the 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR). However, this region is not appropriate for discriminating HCV strains at the subtype level and for distinguishing many genotype 6 samples from genotype 1. We investigated the capacity of a novel LiPA (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay) based on the simultaneous detection of 5'UTR and Core regions for genotypes 1 and 6 to provide correct HCV genotypes (characterized with a phylogenetic analysis) in a set of HCV strains mainly encountered in Western countries. The improvement was assessed by comparing the results to those obtained with the previous version of the assay. Of the 135 tested samples, 64.7% were concordant for genotype group and subtype with sequencing reference results using the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay versus 37.5% with the previous version. The yield was mainly related to a better characterization of genotype 1, since the accuracy, tested in 62 genotype 1 samples, increased from 45.2% with the first version to 96.8% with the new one. However, this new version necessitates a specific PCR and could no longer be used after 5'UTR PCR used for current HCV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the information provided by 5'UTR hybridization is not reliable for correctly identifying the diversity within genotypes 2 and 4. Thus, the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay remains a useful tool for clinical practice when only the discrimination between major HCV genotypes is necessary.     

Successful HCV genotyping of previously failed and low viral load specimens using an HCV RNA qualitative assay based on transcription-mediated amplification in conjunction with the line probe assay.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is a critical part of the diagnostic work-up for chronic hepatitis C. The VERSANT HCV line probe assay (LiPA) marketed by Bayer Corporation requires PCR-derived amplicons for genotyping usually obtained from commercial assays, including Amplicor HCV 2.0 (Amplicor 2.0), Amplicor HCV Monitor 2.0, or SuperQuant. Occasionally, PCR-based methods in conjunction with LiPA fail to give a genotyping result. Although most genotyping failures occur among low viral load specimens, some occur in specimens with relatively high viral loads. The Bayer HCV RNA Qualitative assay (HCV TMA), with a limit of detection of approximately 5-10 IU/ml, is more sensitive than other commercial assays. OBJECTIVES: An HCV genotyping protocol using HCV TMA linked with LiPA (TMA-LiPA) was developed and tested for ability to genotype samples that had previously failed genotyping by PCR-based methods in conjunction with LiPA. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical specimens were obtained from eight independent laboratories in Canada and the US and tested with TMA-LiPA at the Bayer Reference Testing Laboratory. Specimens included those that failed to produce a genotype result when a PCR-based assay was used in conjunction with LiPA and specimens for which genotyping was not attempted because the viral load was below the validated cut-off determined in the laboratory of origin. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: TMA-LiPA successfully genotyped 68 of 75 (90.7%) specimens that had failed genotyping by PCR-based methods used in conjunction with LiPA and 36 of 40 (90.0%) specimens that were rejected for genotyping due to low viral load. Moreover, TMA-LiPA assigned subtype for 79 of 107 (73.8%) specimens. Our TMA-LiPA results reflected the distribution of HCV genotypes found in North America, and were 100% concordant with those of Amplicor 2.0 in conjunction with LiPA for control specimens genotyped by both assays. TMA-LiPA may prove useful both in optimizing LiPA performance and genotyping patient specimens.     

Development and evaluation of a sensitive enzyme-linked oligonucleotide-sorbent assay for detection of polymerase chain reaction-amplified hepatitis C virus of genotypes 1-6

A high-throughput polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based enzyme-linked oligonucleotide-sorbent assay (ELOSA) was developed for use in the diagnostic testing of serum from patients who may be infected with different hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. Twelve genotype-specific 5'-aminated DNA-coated probes were designed based on the variable 5'-untranslated region sequences of the HCV genotypes 1-6. Using 100 clinical serum samples, the performance of the PCR-ELOSA method was compared with Roche's COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor V2.0 assay and the VERSANT HCV genotype assay (LiPA), and the overall agreement was 99% at the level of HCV genotypes with a detection range of 2.0 x 10(2) to 1.0 x 10(7)IU/ml for PCR-ELOSA. The PCR-ELOSA was more comprehensive as demonstrated by the fact that approximately 20% of the samples with different subtypes could be discriminated by this method but not by LiPA. In addition, the PCR-ELOSA system showed high accuracy (CV相似文献   

Comparison of different methods of hepatitis C virus genotyping

In order to introduce the approach of HCV genotyping in our laboratory, a comparative study of 3 molecular and 1 serological methods, was conducted on 62 HCV RNA positive sera. The molecular genotyping methods target the 5'untranslated (UTR) region of the virus genome and are based on an amplification of the viral genome, followed by partial sequencing, analyses of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) or molecular hybridation (Inno LiPA, Innogenetics). The serological method or serotyping is based on the detection of antibodies to genotype specific epitopes derivated from the Non Structural (NS) 4 region of the viral genome (HCV 1-6 Serotyping Assay, Murex Biotech). "In house" methods, sequencing and RFLP, identified the genotype for 13 samples classified as non-typables by commercial kits Inno LiPA test and HCV 1-6 Serotyping Assay. Mixed infections revealed, especially by Inno LiPA, could not be identified by partial sequencing, which seems to detect only predominant genotype. For 4 samples, genotyping results of the methods targeting the 5'UTR were discordant with those of the serotyping of the NS4 region. Commercial kits are efficient to determine HCV genotypes, particularly in the context of antiviral therapy and patient's follow-up, sequencing remains the best alternative for more complete characterisation of viral strains and for epidemiological investigations.     

Identification of hepatitis C virus genotype 6 in Korean patients by analysis of 5' untranslated region using a matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight-based assay, restriction fragment mass polymorphism

Previous surveys of the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Korea have identified types 1 and 2, but little has been said of other genotypes and viral subtypes. In this study, HCV genotypes in Korea were investigated using Restriction Fragment Mass Polymorphism (RFMP) assay, a sensitive and specific method for genotyping based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. A total of 1,043 independent serum samples from HCV-infected patients were analyzed. Of interest, 15 subjects (1.4%) were determined to contain HCV genotype 6 and 46 subjects (4.4%) contained mixed genotypes with the most prevalent genotypes being HCV 1b and 2a/c (45.0% and 35.4%, respectively). The 15 subjects with HCV genotype 6 comprised eight cases of subtype 6c, including one case of mixed infection with 1b, three cases of HCV 6a, and six cases of unassigned subtypes. Sequencing corroborated the identity of genotype 6 from 13 subjects, while the line probe assay (LiPA) mis-identified them as genotype 1b. The majority (7/9) of the genotype 6 patients enrolled for interferon/ribavirin therapy, achieved a sustained virologic response. The ability of the RFMP assay to differentiate various HCV genotypes should enable better analysis of the relationship between HCV genotype and disease prognosis.     

Evaluation of a new hepatitis C virus sequencing assay as a routine method for genotyping

The determination of HCV genotypes, subtypes and isolates has been helpful in understanding the evolution and the epidemiology of the virus, and is an important factor in the pre-treatment evaluation. A new simpler and automated sequencing based system has been developed recently, the Visible Genetics TruGene Hepatitis C Assay. The aim of the study was to compare this new genotyping assay with reverse hybridization based Innogenetics INNO-LiPA HCV II assay that is used most commonly. Eighty-eight HCV-RNA positive patients were enrolled and divided in four groups: 26 hemodialysed patients, 30 untreated patients with chronic HCV hepatitis, 12 IFN non-responder patients with chronic HCV hepatitis, 20 asymptomatic HCV positive subjects. The 5'-UTR region was amplified by RT-PCR and the nucleotide sequences determined by the TruGene assay. In parallel, the amplicons were also tested by INNO-LiPA. Concordant results were obtained in 80 out of 88 cases (90.9%). The new assay allowed to genotype 2 samples not typed by LiPA as 1b and 2a/c. The new system also allowed the subtyping of 3 untypable samples, classified as genotype 1 by INNO-LiPA, as genotype 1b (1 sample) and, as genotype 4 (2 samples). The difference between these genotype 4 isolates and the closest genotype 1 isolate was 6 nucleotides. One LiPA genotype 1a sample was typed as 1b and 2 genotype 1b samples were all typed as 1a by the sequence analysis. In conclusion, the new assay is a sensitive and rapid method that is suitable for accurate large-scale genotyping.     

Hepatitis C virus genotyping: interrogation of the 5' untranslated region cannot accurately distinguish genotypes 1a and 1b

Although the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR) is the most conserved region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome, it has been suggested that interrogation of this region is sufficient for determination of the HCV genotype. We compared two methods of determination of the HCV genotype: (i) direct sequencing of the DNA of the NS-5b region and (ii) reverse line probe assay (LiPA; INNO-LiPA HCV II; Innogenetics N.V.) of the 5' UTR. There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotype but only 80% concordance for subtype. A significant percentage of genotype 1a isolates were misclassified by LiPA as genotype 1b. Sequence analysis revealed that the only consistent difference in the 5' UTR for these genotype 1a isolates misclassified as genotype 1b was a single nucleotide (A/G) at position -99 of the HCV genome. All isolates with discordant results analyzed had a G at this position, consistent with LiPA determination of these samples as subtype 1b. However, sequence analysis of 222 nucleotides in the NS-5b region clearly identified all of these isolates as subtype 1a. Population distribution data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center of over 200 samples analyzed by sequencing of the NS-5b region and over 1,000 samples analyzed by LiPA also indicated that INNO-LiPA HCV II cannot accurately differentiate HCV genotype 1a isolates from HCV genotype 1b isolates. We provide evidence that the A/G at position -99 represents a sequence polymorphism in the HCV genome that cannot differentiate subtype 1a from subtype 1b isolates. In conclusion, the 5' UTR is not heterogeneous enough for use in determination of the HCV subtype and cannot be used for differentiation of HCV genotypes 1a and 1b.     

Evaluation of the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit with the new GeneLibrarian module 3.1.2 for genotyping of hepatitis C virus from clinical specimens

The TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit (GeneLibrarian modules 3.1.1 and 3.1.2) and VERSANT HCV genotyping assay were compared by using 96 hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive patient specimens, including HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10. The TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit (GeneLibrarian module 3.1.2) yielded the most accurate genotyping results.     

Greater diversity of hepatitis C virus genotypes found in Hong Kong than in mainland China.

A hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping PCR assay based on type-specific primers was expanded to include genotype 6a as well as genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, and 3a. The nucleotide sequences of a 194-bp fragment in the center of the HCV core gene showed that the homologies between genotype 6a and genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 5 were 81.2, 82.1, 73.8, 77.3, 81.4, and 78.9%, respectively. A high degree of homology (99.6%) was seen in the amplified core region among eight clinically unrelated genotype 6a isolates. Although the Hong Kong Chinese patients had predominantly genotype 1b (70%), it was noteworthy that genotype 6a was the second most common genotype (14%). Four other HCV genotypes--1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b--were also present. In contrast, HCV infection by mainland China was confined to genotypes 1b and 2a. Thus, we found a greater diversity of HCV genotypes in Hong Kong than in mainland China.     

Comparative study of different methods to genotype hepatitis C virus type 6 variants

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6a is found frequently in Southeast Asia. In Thailand, however, genotype 6 variants may exist which posses a genotype 1 like sequence in the 5' non-coding region. In order to genotype correctly these viruses, four different methods; INNO-LiPA assay, two RFLP assays on the core region (using different restriction enzymes) and phylogenetic analysis of the core sequences were compared. Samples from 17 chronic HCV patients from the Netherlands and Thailand and 18 anti-HCV positive blood donors recruited from Thailand were tested. The INNO-LiPA could not distinguish genotype 6 variants. The RFLP methods used could not, or only in combination with 5'NCR genotyping methods, identify type 6 variants. In conclusion, for identification of type 6 variants at least two different regions of the HCV genome have to be analyzed (both 5'NCR and core).     

Genotypes and viral load of hepatitis C virus among persons attending a voluntary counseling and testing center in Ethiopia

The prevalence of different genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Ethiopia is not known. HCV genotypes influence the response to therapy with alpha‐interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin. A cross sectional study was conducted on attendees of voluntary counseling and testing center. Serum samples from 1,954 (734 HIV positive and 1,220 HIV negative) individuals were screened for HCV antibody. Active HCV infection was confirmed by quantitative PCR in 18 of the 71 samples with anti‐HCV antibodies. The HCV viral load ranged from 39,650 to 9,878,341 IU/ml (median 1,589,631 IU/ml) with no significant difference [χ²(17) = 18.00, P = 0.389] between persons positive or negative for HIV. The viral load of HCV was, however, higher in older study subjects (r = 0.80, P = 0.000). HCV genotypes were determined using the VERSANT HCV Genotype Assay (LiPA) and sequence analysis of the NS5b region of the HCV genome. Diverse HCV genotypes were found including genotypes 1, 2, 4, and 5. There was no difference in the distribution regarding the HIV status. As in other parts of the world, genotyping of HCV must be considered whenever HCV is incriminated as a cause of hepatitis. J. Med. Virol. 83:776–782, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Second-generation line probe assay for hepatitis C virus genotyping.

Because of the enormous variability of hepatitis C virus (HCV), the development of reliable genotyping assays is a formidable challenge. The optimal genotyping region appears to be the 5' untranslated region (UR) because of high conservation within, but considerable variability between, genotypes. In this study, 21 probes dispersed over seven variable 5' UR areas were applied to a line probe assay (LiPA) and used to analyze 506 HCV-infected sera from different geographical regions representing a multitude of subtypes. At least 31 different reactivity patterns emerged, with 404 (80%) of 506 distributed over 11 prototype patterns, in general corresponding to subtypes 1a, 1b, 2a/2c, 2b, 3a, 5a, and 6a and several type 4 subtypes. Subtyping specificity ranged from 97% in Hong Kong to 90% in Europe but was only 11% in West Africa, while typing specificity was always 100% when samples from Vietnam were excluded. In a second evaluation, the subtype prediction by LiPA of 448 GenBank 5' UR HCV sequences was scored. Of the 58 theoretically predicted patterns, 321 sequences (72%) were covered by the 11 prototype patterns. We concluded that (i) the selected probes detected the corresponding signature motifs in the seven variable regions with 100% reliability; (ii) these motifs allowed correct type interpretation of samples collected worldwide, with the exclusion of Vietnam, Thailand, or Vietnamese patients residing in European hospitals; and (iii) subtyping specificities vary according to geographical region, with 11 prototype subtyping patterns identifying the majority of samples from Europe and the Americas. These results indicate that the LiPA is a reliable assay applicable to routine typing and subtyping of HCV specimens.     

Use of sequence analysis of the NS5B region for routine genotyping of hepatitis C virus with reference to C/E1 and 5' untranslated region sequences

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the NS5B region was performed to identify genotypes of 8,479 hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive patient samples collected in the Canadian province of Quebec. Genotypes could be determined for 97.3% of patients. Genotypes 1 to 6 were found in 59.4, 9.0, 25.7, 3.6, 0.6, and 1.8% of patients, respectively. Two isolates did not classify within the six genotypes. The subtype 1 distribution was 76.7% 1a, 22.6% 1b, and 0.7% others, while the subtype 2 distribution was 31.8% 2a, 47.6% 2b, 10.9% 2c, 4.1% 2i, and 5.6% others. Subtype 3a accounted for 99.1% of genotype 3 strains, while all genotype 5 samples were of subtype 5a. The subtype 4 distribution was 39.2% 4a, 15.4% 4k, 11.6% 4d, 10.2% 4r, and 23.6% others. The subtype 6 distribution was 40.4% 6e, 20.5% 6a, and 39.1% others. The 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) sequences of subtype 6e were indistinguishable from those of genotype 1. All samples that did not classify within the established subtypes were also sequenced in C/E1 and 5'UTR. C/E1 phylogenetic reconstructions were analogous to those of NS5B. The sequences identified in this study allowed the provisional assignments of subtypes 1j, 1k, 2m, 2r, 3i, 4q, 6q, 6r, and 6s. Sixty-four (0.8%) isolates classifying within genotypes 1 to 6 could not be assigned to one of the recognized subtypes. Our results show that genotyping of HCV by nucleotide sequence analysis of NS5B is efficient, allows the accurate discrimination of subtypes, and is an effective tool for studying the molecular epidemiology of HCV.     

Hepatitis C virus subtyping based on sequencing of the C/E1 and NS5B genomic regions in comparison to a commercially available line probe assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination is required in clinical practice to establish the dose and duration of antiviral treatment. Although subtype identification does not impact on current therapy this is changing with new specific inhibitors of HCV enzymes and functions which are becoming available worldwide. These new drugs may yield different antiviral responses and resistance profiles. Accurate classification of HCV genotype and subtype is therefore crucial. An “in‐house” method was developed for improving HCV subtyping and the results were compared with a second‐generation line probe assay (LiPA) used extensively in Portugal. Phylogenetic analysis was undertaken of the C/E1 and NS5B genomic regions of HCV isolated from 72 prisoners with chronic HCV infection and from reference samples. Although LiPA is considered to be a good method for genotyping, HCV was subtyped in only 47.2% of cases compared with 95.8% of cases by the “in‐house” method. Molecular data for both C/E1 and NS5B regions were obtained in 88.9% of the samples. Two out of 23 cases of subtype 1a were misclassified as subtype 1b by LiPA. A putative recombinant like RF1_2k/1b, two potential inter‐genotypic recombinants 1b/4a and 3a/4a, and also a potential intra‐genotypic recombinant 2q/2k in C/E1 and 2k/2a in NS5B were also identified. The “in‐house” method enabled HCV to be subtyped accurately with the detection, in some cases, of recombinant viruses or dual HCV infections. Near full‐length genomic analysis to characterize these potential recombinant viruses is planned. J. Med. Virol. 85:815–822, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

HCV genotype distribution in Flanders and Brussels (Belgium): unravelling the spread of an uncommon HCV genotype 5a cluster

In order to study the hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemiology in Flanders, Belgium, the HCV genotype of 2,301 patients diagnosed with HCV between 2001 and 2009 was determined. HCV genotyping was conducted using the Versant LiPA 1.0 or Versant LiPA 2.0 assay. To explore the transmission history of a remarkable cluster of the rarely found HCV genotype 5a, face-to-face interviews based on detailed questionnaires and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis were performed. HCV genotype 1 was the most prevalent genotype in all provinces, followed by HCV genotype 3 in East Flanders, Antwerp, Flemish Brabant and Limburg. In Brussels, HCV genotype 4 was the second most prevalent genotype. This observation is due to the immigration of patients from the Middle East and Africa. Remarkably, a cluster of HCV genotype 5a was found in West Flanders, where it represents the second most prevalent genotype, accounting for 26.2% of HCV infections. We could not identify one major transmission source explaining the whole HCV genotype 5a epidemic. Instead, several smaller possible transmission chains were identified and confirmed phylogenetically. Overall, the HCV genotype 5a epidemic in West Flanders seems to be mainly associated with blood transfusion and unsafe medical practices.     

Genotyping of hepatitis C virus isolates by a new line probe assay using sequence information from both the 5'untranslated and the core regions

The correct assessment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and subtypes by commercial assays is of utmost importance mainly for the therapeutic management of patients suffering from HCV infections. In this study, the performance characteristics of a newly designed genotyping assay were evaluated that does not rely exclusively on sequence information derived from the 5'untranslated region but also takes into account part of the HCV core. One hundred and ten clinical specimens were tested by this new assay prior to its commercialisation. The obtained typing results were compared to those recorded by the 5'UTR-based Versant HCV Genotyping Assay, version 1, the core-related Gen-Eti K DEIA, and phylogenetic analyses of partial HCV core and NS5B sequences. The HCV genotypes and subtypes identified by the newly devised kit were completely in line with the assignments achieved by DEIA and phylogenetic analyses. In particular, all 64 HCV strains belonging to subtypes 1a or 1b were recognised correctly, and HCV 6e and 6f isolates were adequately assigned to subtypes 6c-l. Thus, the second generation of the Versant genotyping assay could overcome the drawbacks of its exclusively 5'UTR-based predecessor and will turn out to be a reliable tool for HCV typing in clinical laboratories.