Safety and Efficacy of Cefixime versus Cefaclor in Respiratory Tract Infections

Summary

A randomized controlled study design was used to compare the efficacy of cefixime versus cefaclor in 30 patients suffering from lower respiratory tract infections. Patients were treated with a 10 to 11 day course of cefixime 200 mg b.i.d. or cefaclor 500 mg t.i.d.

The overall clinical response (cured and improved) in the 13 evaluable patients of the cefixime group was 100%. 12 of the 14 patients of the cefaclor group were cured or improved. In the two other patients the symptoms remained unchanged. The bacteriological efficacy in both groups was comparable.

Adverse effects were not reported during the study.     

The Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Ceftibuten Compared with Co-amoxiclav in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Sinusitis

Summary

The efficacy and safety of a once-daily oral regimen of 400 mg ceftibuten was compared with oral co-amoxiclav 500 mg three times daily in a multicentre, single-blind study. In patients with a bacteriologically confirmed infection, a successful clinical outcome was reported in 25 of 25 patients treated with ceftibuten and 10 of 10 patients treated with co-amoxiclav. In a further group of 88 patients, most of whom had been excluded from the primary efficacy evaluation because no pathogen was isolated pretreatment, overall successful clinical outcomes of 87% and 88% were reported for ceftibuten and co-amoxiclav, respectively. The duration of treatment and the time to resolution of the signs and symptoms of sinusitis were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was higher in the co-amoxiclav-treated patients (31% versus 15% in the ceftibuten group) as was the incidence of severe events (10% for co-amoxiclavtreated patients versus < 1% in the ceftibuten group). In summary, once-daily ceftibuten can be considered a safe and effective treatment for acute bacterial sinusitis.     

The efficacy and safety of once-daily ceftibuten compared with co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.

The efficacy and safety of a once-daily oral regimen of 400 mg ceftibuten was compared with oral co-amoxiclav 500 mg three times daily in a multicentre, single-blind study. In patients with a bacteriologically confirmed infection, a successful clinical outcome was reported in 25 of 25 patients treated with ceftibuten and 10 of 10 patients treated with co-amoxiclav. In a further group of 88 patients, most of whom had been excluded from the primary efficacy evaluation because no pathogen was isolated pretreatment, overall successful clinical outcomes of 87% and 88% were reported for ceftibuten and co-amoxiclav, respectively. The duration of treatment and the time to resolution of the signs and symptoms of sinusitis were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was higher in the co-amoxiclav-treated patients (31% versus 15% in the ceftibuten group) as was the incidence of severe events (10% for co-amoxiclav-treated patients versus < 1% in the ceftibuten group). In summary, once-daily ceftibuten can be considered a safe and effective treatment for acute bacterial sinusitis.     

A Randomized,Observer-Blind Trial of Amoxycillin/Clavulanate Versus Cefaclor in the Treatment of Children with Acute Otitis Media

Abstract

In this randomized, multicenter, observer-blind study, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefaclor were compared in children with a clinical diagnosis of acute otitis media. Patients aged between 1 and 12 years received either amoxycillin/clavulanate (250 mg/62 mg t.i.d., or 125 mg/31 mg t.i.d. if aged under 6 years) or cefaclor (250 mg t.i.d., or 125 mg t.i.d. if aged under 6 years) for 7 days. The amoxycillin/clavulanate regimen was based on a dose of 20/5 mg/kg/day (representing 20 mg amoxy-cillin plus 5 mg clavulanic acid) in three divided doses. Patients were followed-up at the end of therapy and on days 10-12 and 38-40.

At the end of the study (days 38-40), clinical success rates were 91.4% for amoxycillin/clavulanate and 78.6% for cefaclor. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.008). After the 7 days of treatment, 3 patients (2.9%) in the amoxycillin/clavulanate group had clinical failure, compared with 18 patients (16.1%) in the cefaclor group (p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in adverse event profiles. The incidence of diarrhea was low (7.0% amoxycillin/clavulanate, 8.4% cefaclor) and was generally of mild or moderate intensity.

The study demonstrated that amoxycillin/clavulanate was significantly more effective clinically than cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.     

Comparison of Cefaclor and Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Media with Effusion in Children Who Failed Amoxicillin Therapy

Abstract

This trial compared the efficacy and safety of a 10-day treatment course of cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion in children who failed therapy with amoxicillin.

This was an investigator-blind, randomized, parallel treatment group study. To be included, patients must have received treatment with a standard clinical regimen of amoxicillin for at least 48 hours and not more than 10 days, with the last dose within 72 hours of randomization. Patients who met the entry criteria were randomly assigned to one of two antibiotic treatment groups. Cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil suspensions were administered twice daily for a total daily dose of 40 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg, respectively. Physical examination, pneumatic otoscopy and tympanogram were performed to evaluate efficacy to therapy. Therapeutic equivalence was established by ruling out a difference (cefaclor minus cefuroxime axetil) of 15% in percentages of clinical success (cure plus improvement). Safety evaluation was performed by assessment of clinical adverse events.

In the intent-to-treat analysis post-therapy (1-6 days after completion of therapy), 96 of 104 (92.3%) cefaclor-treated patients had clinical success compared to 90 of 101 (89.1%) cefuroxime axetil patients. The 95% confidence limits on the difference between proportions of favorable outcomes (cefaclor minus cefuroxime axetil) was from ?4.8% to +11.2%. At termination of the study (day 10-16 after completion of therapy), 86 of 104 (82.7%) cefaclor patients and 84 of 101 (83.2%) cefuroxime axetil patients had favorable clinical outcomes (95% confidence interval: ?10.8% to +9.9%). Thirty-two (30.8%) of the 104 patients in the cefaclor treatment group reported at least one adverse event, with rhinitis reported in 9 (8.7%) patients and cough increased in 7 (6.7%) patients. Thirty-six (35.6%) of the 101 patients in the cefuroxime axetil treatment group reported at least one event, with diarrhea reported in 11 (10.9%) of patients and rhinitis in 10 (9.9%) patients.

Cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil were equally effective in the treatment of patients with acute otitis media with effusion who had failed therapy with amoxicillin. Significantly fewer patients treated with cefaclor reported diarrhea, which is the most frequently reported adverse event in children treated with antibiotics for this disease.     

Neoadjuvant capecitabine and docetaxel (plus trastuzumab): an effective non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced breast cancer

BackgroundTo evaluate capecitabine–docetaxel (XT), with trastuzumab (H) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease, in inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).Patients and methodsPatients received up to six neoadjuvant 21-day cycles of capecitabine 900 mg/m² twice daily, days 1–14, plus docetaxel 36 mg/m², days 1 and 8. Patients with HER2-positive disease also received trastuzumab 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, evaluated separately in HER2-negative and HER2-positive cohorts. Secondary end points included clinical response rates and tolerability.ResultsThe pCR rate was 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7–28] in 53 patients receiving XT and 40% (95% CI 26–55) in 50 patients receiving HXT. After neoadjuvant therapy, 50 patients receiving XT and 45 receiving HXT underwent surgery. No unexpected toxicity was observed: the most common grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea/mucositis (30% and 20%, respectively) and grade 3 hand–foot syndrome (11% and 6%, respectively). Disease-free survival and overall survival were similar with XT and HXT after median follow-up of 22 months in the XT cohort and 21 months in the HXT cohort.ConclusionNeoadjuvant XT (HXT in HER2-positive disease) is highly effective in inoperable LABC, demonstrating pCR rates of 15% and 40%, respectively. This non-anthracycline-containing regimen offers obvious benefits in early disease, where avoidance of long-term cardiotoxicity is particularly important.     

Susceptibility of Respiratory and Urinary Pathogens to Ceftibuten and Other Comparative Drugs: Results of an Italian Multicenter Survey

Summary

A survey aimed at assessing the ability of ceftibuten, a new oral third-generation cephalosporin, to eradicate in Vitro selected bacterial pathogens was conducted in 1991 in 17 microbiology laboratories evenly distributed in Italy. Over 8700 organisms collected from in- and outpatients affected mainly by respiratory and urinary tract infections were analyzed. This collection of bacteria did not include staphylococci, enterococci, Pseudomonta and other oxidative species naturally refractory to the action of most antibiotics employed.

Susceptibility to ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefuroxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin was assessed using a standardized agar-diffusion method. Production of β-lactamases was confirmed by the nitrocefin test. Among the microorganisms studied E. coli (32.1%) prevailed, followed by P. mirabilis (17.1%), K. pneumoniae (10.9%), 5. pyogenes (6.6%), E. cloacae (5.1%), Serratia spp. (4.5%), Enterobacter spp. (4.2%), H. influenzae (3.6%), S. pneumoniae (2.2%) and Af. catarrhalis (2%). Within this group of pathogens amoxicillin resistance, often mediated by synthesis of P-lactamases, was widely diffused (46.2%). The overall inhibitory activity of the drugs tested decreased as follows: ceftibuten (90.4%), cefuroxime (80.4%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (77.4%), cotrimoxazole (75.3%), cefaclor (72.6%), amoxicillin (53.8%) and erythromycin (32.8%). When the efficacy of the antibiotics was assessed against the collection of respiratory isolates producing β-lactamases only ceftibuten maintained the same overall potency manifested against the general population while the comparative agents were far less effective. The results of this national survey indicate that, given the low incidence of resistance among the most prevalent causative agents of respiratory and urinary tract infections, ceftibuten can be safely used at present in the empiric therapy of these conditions especially when they occur in community settings.     

Once-Daily Tobramycin Therapy in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

Abstract

In a multicenter Italian study of 104 adult patients with severe bacterial lower respiratory tract infections, the safety and efficacy of a regimen of high dose, once-daily tobramycin alone or in combination with antipseu-domonas betalactams was assessed.

The overall bacteriological response was an elimination of the original pathogen in 70% of the patients while the overall clinical response mirrored the bacteriological results with a successful clinical outcome in 78% of patients. Adverse experiences were, in general, few and mild without oto- or nephrotoxicity. The once-daily, high dose regimen of tobramycin proved to be a safe and efficacious therapy for severe lower respiratory tract infections in adult patients.     

Comparison of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by radiation vs concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

AimsTo compare the effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by radiation with that of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).Materials and methodsIn a group of patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by radiation, 15 patients received two cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel 60 mg/m², cisplatin 70 mg/m² and 5-day 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 750 mg/m²/day. Radiotherapy was begun 21 days after completing chemotherapy. In the group receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 19 patients received two cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel 50 mg/m², cisplatin 60 mg/m², and 5-day 5-FU 600 mg/m²/day. Radiation was begun on the first day of chemotherapy. The total radiation dose was between 63 and 74 Gy.ResultsOverall response rate (partial and complete response — both 100%) and complete response rate (87% and 84%) were similar, but, in overall survival, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF was better than induction chemotherapy with TPF followed by radiation. Mucositis and anaemia were more frequent in the group receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but the group receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF improved overall survival.ConclusionsThis is a small non-randomised comparison. The effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TPF was better than that of induction chemotherapy with TPF followed by radiation.     

Similar Outcome of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Imatinib in or Out of Clinical Trials

IntroductionOutcomes of CML-CP patients treated in clinical trials are frequently perceived to be not representative of those treated outside of clinical trials.Patients and MethodsWe investigated the outcomes of patients receiving imatinib outside of a clinical trial (off protocol) or in a clinical trial (on protocol) for CML-CP.ResultsWe identified 65 patients treated with imatinib off protocol and 71 patients treated on protocol with standard-dose imatinib. The overall complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate was 83% for patients treated on and off protocol. CCyR rates 12 months after initiation of imatinib were not statistically different (61% vs. 66%, respectively; P = .15). Patients treated off protocol had similar rates of overall major molecular response (72% vs. 73%) compared with the patients treated on protocol. The 5-year event-free survival rates were 84% and 86% for off and on protocol patients, respectively. There was also no significant difference in 5-year transformation free survival (94% vs. 96%) and overall survival (96% vs. 90%).ConclusionThese results suggest that patients with CML treated outside of a clinical trial might have the same excellent outcome as those treated in a clinical trial provided they are followed with the same rigor.     

Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Venetoclax: A Single-Center Evaluation of Off-Label Use

IntroductionVenetoclax is a highly effective agent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Phase I/II clinical trials have shown it to be safe and effective in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Adverse events were consistent with package labeling despite escalation to high doses. To the best of our knowledge, venetoclax use outside the setting of a clinical trial of NHL has not been reported.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 34 adult patients who had been treated off-label with venetoclax-containing regimens from 2016 to 2018.ResultsOf the 34 patients with NHL treated with venetoclax therapy, 13 had had high-grade B-cell lymphoma/diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 10 mantle cell lymphoma, 5 transformed follicular lymphoma, 2 Richter transformation, 2 marginal zone lymphoma, 1 follicular lymphoma, and 1 post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. The patients had received a median of 4 previous therapies. The overall response rate was 26% (3% with a complete response and 35% with stable disease). The median venetoclax dose achieved was 400 mg. Of those receiving combination therapy, 18% had undergone radiation and 62% had received other systemic antineoplastic therapy. The median progression-free and overall survival for the cohort was 2 and 4.5 months, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 76% of the patients during venetoclax therapy. The adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, tumor lysis syndrome, infection, neutropenic fever, diarrhea, and 1 opportunistic infection.ConclusionVenetoclax therapy in a real-world cohort offered modest benefits in heavily pretreated patients. Adverse events were observed at a greater incidence than in the clinical trials. A wide heterogeneity of venetoclax dose escalation, multiagent combinations, and timing of initiation were identified and require investigation in subsequent clinical trials.     

Efficacy and Safety of the Modified EPOCH Regimen (Etoposide,Vincristine, Doxorubicin,Carboplatin, and Prednisolone) for Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BackgroundWe retrospectively analyzed patients with untreated aggressive adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma who received the modified EPOCH (mEPOCH) regimen.Patients and MethodsPatients received up to 6 mEPOCH cycles. Etoposide (50 mg/m²/day), doxorubicin (10 mg/m²/day), and vincristine (0.4 mg/m²/day) were each given as a continuous 96-hour infusion on days 1 to 4. Prednisolone (40 mg/m²/day) was given intravenously or orally on days 1 to 4 and then tapered and stopped on day 7, and carboplatin (dose calculated for each patient individually using Calvert’s formula according to a target under the curve of 3 mg/mL/min) was given as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 6.ResultsIn 103 patients, overall response rate and complete response rate were 58% and 25%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.9 months, the median survival time was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-13.9 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 3.4-5.7 months). Patients who completed ≥ 4 cycles experienced significantly better overall survival and PFS compared with those who completed < 4 cycles. Twenty-eight patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after mEPOCH and demonstrated significantly prolonged overall survival and PFS compared with those who did not undergo transplantation.ConclusionThe mEPOCH regimen is effective with tolerable adverse effects and may be an alternative treatment option for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.     

North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N0432: phase II trial of docetaxel with capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundDocetaxel (T; Taxotere) with capecitabine (X) is active against metastatic breast cancer (MBC); bevacizumab (BV) has demonstrated efficacy with taxanes in the first-line setting. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of TX-BV in patients with MBC.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received first-line bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice per day on days 1–14 every 21 days. Primary and secondary end points were tumor response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.ResultsA total of 45 assessable patients received TX-BV for a median of seven cycles. Two complete and 20 partial responses were observed (overall RR 49%); nine patients had stable disease >6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 69%. Median response duration was 11.8 months. Median OS and PFS were 28.4 and 11.1 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events included hand–foot syndrome (29%), fatigue (20%), febrile neutropenia (18%), and diarrhea (18%). In cycles 3–10, median dose levels of docetaxel and capecitabine were 60 mg/m² and 660 mg/m², respectively.ConclusionTX-BV demonstrated significant activity; dose modifications were required to manage drug-related toxic effects.     

A Phase II Trial of Mitoxantrone plus Cyclophosphamide and 5-Fluorouracil in Modulation with Levo-Folinate for Advanced Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract

Advanced breast cancer remains a major clinical problem. Current chemotherapy regimens are able to induce a clinical response in many patients but do not appear to influence significantly patients' survival. The use of new drugs such as mitoxantrone with a predicted lower toxi-city and biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil with levo-folinate are extensively studied research areas that could combine good therapeutic efficacy with the maintenance of an acceptable quality of life. 34 patients with advanced breast carcinoma were included in the study. Only 4 women had received prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Treatment plan was: 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² + l-leucovorin 100 mg/m² days 1-3, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² and mitoxantrone 12-14 mg/m² on day 3, q28. G-CSF (5 μg/kg/d days 7-14) was routinely delivered to the patients with the aim of maintaining dose intensity. 15 patients obtained a response for an overall response rate of 44%. Mean duration was 10.2+ and 11+ months for complete and partial responses respectively. Mean overall survival was 14.4+ months. A high complete response rate was seen in liver metastasis (44%), while lung lesions had a lower probability of response (25%). Toxicity was globally mild with 23% of grade 3 vomiting and 15% of grade 3-4 leukopenia. Two cases of cardiotoxicity were reported. No difference in response rate or toxicity was identified between patients receiving two different mitoxantrone doses (12 or 14 mg/m²). The schedule employed appears to be well tolerated and active in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. However, results are not different from those of other conventional combinations and so the economic expense of the therapy should represent a determining element in the choice of therapy.     

Translating clinical trials to clinical practice: outcomes of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and prednisone in and out of clinical trials

BackgroundMultiple factors can influence outcomes of patients receiving identical interventions in clinical trials and in routine practice. Here, we compare outcomes of men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel and prednisone in routine practice and in clinical trials.Patients and methodsWe reviewed patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Primary outcomes were overall survival and PSA response rate. Secondary outcomes were reasons for discontinuation and febrile neutropenia. Outcomes were compared for men treated in routine practice and in clinical trials, and with data from the TAX 327 study.ResultsFrom 2001 to 2011, 438 men were treated, of whom 357 received 3-weekly docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy: 314 in routine practice and 43 in clinical trials. Trial patients were younger and had better performance status. Median survival was 13.6 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 12.1–15.1 months] in routine practice and 20.4 months (95% CI 17.4–23.4 months, P = 0.007) within clinical trials, compared with 19.3 months (95% CI 17.6–21.3 months, P < 0.001) in the TAX 327 study. PSA response rates were 45%, 54%, and 53%, respectively (P = NS). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar although trial patients received more cycles (median: 6 versus 8 versus 9.5, P < 0.001). Rates of febrile neutropenia were 9.6, 0, and 3% (P < 0.001) while rates of death within 30 days of last dose were 4%, 0%, and 3%, respectively (P = NS).ConclusionsSurvival of patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel in routine practice is shorter than for men included in trials and is associated with more toxicity.     

All-oral combination of lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer – A phase II study

PurposeApproximately one-third of patients with advanced, HER2+ve breast cancer (BC) develop brain metastases (BMs). The aim of this study is to investigate efficacy and tolerability of the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine (LC) in HER2+ve BC patients with brain metastases (BCBM).Patients and methodsBetween January 2011 and January 2013, 21 patients with HER2+ve BCBM were included. Sixteen patients (76.19%) progressed after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 5 patients (23.81%) were treatment-naïve for BM. Patients received lapatinib (1250 mg/day continuously) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m² on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle). All patients were treated with trastuzumab either in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. No patients had received prior lapatinib and/or capecitabine. End-points were response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.ResultsThe overall response rate (ORR) was 33.3% (7/21) and all were partial response. For patients receiving prior WBRT and patients receiving LC as first line treatment for BCBM the ORR was 31.2% (5/16) and 40.0% (2/5) respectively. Median PFS was 5.5 months. Median OS was 11 months. Treatment-related adverse events were manageable. Grade 3–4 toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (14.3%), diarrhea (14.3%), nausea/vomiting (9.5%), mucositis (4.8%), and skin rash (4.8%).ConclusionThe combination of LC is active and well-tolerated treatment in patients with HER2+ve BCBM.     

Shorter bevacizumab infusions do not increase the incidence of proteinuria and hypertension

BackgroundA previous study has shown that shorter bevacizumab infusions (0.5 mg/kg/min) can be safely administered without increasing the risk of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the risk of proteinuria and hypertension in patients receiving shorter infusions of bevacizumab is undetermined.Patients and methodsThis was a multicenter, prospective, observational study in patients receiving <10 mg/kg of bevacizumab infused over 0.5 mg/kg/min. Patients were observed until discontinuation of bevacizumab for progression of cancer or toxicity. The incidence of hypertension and proteinuria was compared with a prior cohort of patients who had received standard duration infusions of bevacizumab.ResultsSixty-three patients received a total of 392 doses of shorter bevacizumab infusions. Nineteen (30.2%) patients experienced proteinuria while receiving bevacizumab. Out of 19 patients, 13 had grade 1 and 6 had grade 2 proteinuria. None of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 proteinuria. Hypertension was reported in 32 (50.8%) patients receiving bevacizumab. Twelve (19%) patients developed grade 3 or greater hypertension on bevacizumab. The incidence of proteinuria and hypertension was 38.3% and 56.6%, respectively, in patients (N = 120, 1347 infusions) receiving standard duration infusions of bevacizumab.ConclusionsShorter bevacizumab infusions (0.5 mg/kg/min) do not increase the risk of proteinuria and hypertension.     

Phase 2 Study of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC: Updated 5-Year Survival Rates and Genomic Analysis

IntroductionDabrafenib plus trametinib was found to have robust antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). We report updated survival analysis of a phase 2 study (NCT01336634) with a minimum of 5-year follow-up and updated genomic data.MethodsPretreated (cohort B) and treatment-naive (cohort C) patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mNSCLC received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily and trametinib 2 mg once daily. The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points were duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.ResultsAt data cutoff, for cohorts B (57 patients) and C (36 patients), the median follow-up was 16.6 (range: 0.5–78.5) and 16.3 (range: 0.4–80) months, overall response rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 68.4% (54.8–80.1) and 63.9% (46.2–79.2), median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 10.2 (6.9–16.7) and 10.8 (7.0–14.5) months, and median overall survival (95% CI) was 18.2 (14.3–28.6) and 17.3 (12.3–40.2) months, respectively. The 4- and 5-year survival rates were 26% and 19% in pretreated patients and 34% and 22% in treatment-naive patients, respectively. A total of 17 patients (18%) were still alive. The most frequent adverse event was pyrexia (56%). Exploratory genomic analysis indicated that the presence of coexisting genomic alterations might influence clinical outcomes in these patients; however, these results require further investigation.ConclusionsDabrafenib plus trametinib therapy was found to have substantial and durable clinical benefit, with a manageable safety profile, in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mNSCLC, regardless of previous treatment.     

Survival follow-up and ipilimumab retreatment of patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab in prior phase II studies

BackgroundThis report provides a survival update at a follow-up of >5 years (5.5–6 years) for patients with advanced melanoma who previously received ipilimumab in phase II clinical trials. Safety and efficacy data following ipilimumab retreatment are also reported.Patients and methodsPatients who previously received ipilimumab 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg in one of six phase II trials (CA184-004, CA184-007, CA184-008, CA184-022, MDX010-08, and MDX010-15) were eligible to enroll in the companion study, CA184-025. Upon enrollment, patients initially received ipilimumab retreatment, extended maintenance therapy, or were followed for survival only. Overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated in patients from studies CA184-004, CA184-007, CA184-008, and CA184-022. Safety and best overall response during ipilimumab retreatment at 10 mg/kg were assessed in study CA184-025.ResultsFive-year OS rates for previously treated patients who received ipilimumab induction at 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg were 12.3%, 12.3%–16.5%, and 15.5%–28.4%, respectively. Five-year OS rates for treatment-naive patients who received ipilimumab induction at 3 or 10 mg/kg were 26.8% and 21.4%–49.5%, respectively. Little to no change in OS was observed from year 5 up to year 6. The objective response rate among retreated patients was 23%. Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 25%, 5.9%, and 13.2% of retreated patients who initially received ipilimumab 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/kg, with the most common being observed in the skin (4.2%, 2.9%, 3.8%) and gastrointestinal tract (12.5%, 2.9%, 3.8%), respectively.ConclusionsAt a follow-up of 5–6 years, ipilimumab continues to demonstrate durable, long-term survival in a proportion of patients with advanced melanoma. In some patients, ipilimumab retreatment can re-establish disease control with a safety profile that is comparable with that observed during ipilimumab induction. Further studies are needed to determine the contribution of ipilimumab retreatment to OS.ClinicalTrials.govNCT00162123.