A New Look at Blockade of T-cell Costimulation: A Therapeutic Strategy for Long-term Maintenance Immunosuppression

Activated T cells orchestrate the immune response that results in graft rejection; therefore, a common goal among current immunosuppressive therapies is to block T-cell activation, proliferation and function. Current immunosuppressive regimens that inhibit T cells and immune cells have greatly reduced the incidence of acute rejection following solid-organ transplant. However, the expected improvements in long-term outcomes have not been realized. This may be related to the non-immune side effects of current maintenance immunosuppressants, which target ubiquitously expressed molecules. The focus in transplantation research is shifting in search of maintenance immunosuppressive regimens that might offer improved long-term outcomes by providing efficacy in prevention of acute rejection combined with reduced toxicities. An emerging therapeutic strategy involves an immunoselective maintenance immunosuppressant that inhibits full T-cell activation by blocking the interaction between costimulatory receptor–ligand pairs. This review describes costimulatory pathways and the development of molecules, which inhibit them in the context of transplantation research. Recent clinical data using the selective costimulation blocker, belatacept (LEA29Y), as a part of a CNI-free maintenance immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplantation is highlighted.     

Cyclosporine preserves the anergic state of human T cells induced by costimulation blockade in vitro

BACKGROUND: Costimulation blockade based tolerance-inducing therapies might be disrupted by adjunct conventional immunosuppressive drug use. In the current study, we evaluated the compatibility of various immunosuppressive agents on costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression and T-cell anergy induction of human alloreactive T-cells in vitro. T-cell anergy is crucial in transplantation tolerance. METHODS: T cell anergy was induced in human mixed lymphocyte cultures in vitro, by monoclonal antibodies directed against the costimulatory ligands CD40 and CD86. The effect of coadministration of conventional immunosuppressive drugs (CsA, rapamycin or FK506) on the inhibitory potential of costimulation blockade and the induction and maintenance of T cell anergy was analyzed. RESULTS: We found that monoclonal antibodies against CD40 and CD86 and the simultaneous use of conventional immunosuppressive drugs resulted in strong immunosuppression of proliferation and cytokine production. Rapamycin, in contrast to FK506 and CsA, facilitated T-cell apoptosis. However, drug cotreatment prevented costimulation blockade induced T-cell anergy. Induction of human T-cell anergy in vitro required approximately 5 days of culture. Coadministration of drugs at day 5 after the start of mAb treatment, when anergy was established, did not increase the immunosuppressive effect of mAb treatment. But interestingly, in the majority of experiments, in contrast to rapamycin and FK506, CsA did not affect the anergic state when given after T-cell anergy induction. Moreover, the cell death facilitating potential of rapamycin vanished when used later after T-cell activation. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and choice of conventional drug are crucial in the success of costimulation blockade-based tolerance induction therapies.     

BK Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated with a Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Immunosuppression Regimen

Recently, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has been reported more frequently and is emerging as an important cause of renal allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Susceptibility appears to be related to the type and intensity of pharmacologic immunosuppression but some reports have suggested a link among the development of PVAN, the treatment of rejection or maintenance with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. We report three cases of PVAN in patients who never received immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Two patients received induction immunosuppression consisting of an IL-2 receptor antagonist while 1 received thymoglobulin. These 3 patients were maintained on prednisone, sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and none was treated for rejection. All three patients presented with an elevated serum creatinine and demonstrated polyomavirus infection on biopsy and by blood PCR. These cases demonstrate that, unlike reports linking tacrolimus and PVAN, polyomavirus infection may develop in patients maintained on CNI-free immunosuppressive regimens and have not had episodes of rejection.     

New immunosuppressive agents in transplantation

Immunosuppressive agents have enabled the development of allogenic transplantation during the last 40 years, allowing considerable improvement in graft survival. However, several issues remain such as the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors, the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens and/or the higher risk of opportunistic infections and cancers. Most immunosuppressive agents target T cell activation and may not be efficient enough to prevent allo-immunization in the long term. Finally, antibody mediated rejection due to donor specific antibodies strongly affects allograft survival.Many drugs have been tested in the last decades, but very few have come to clinical use. The most recent one is CTLA4-Ig (belatacept), a costimulation blockade molecule that targets the second signal of T cell activation and is associated with a better long term kidney function than calcineurin inhibitors, despite an increased risk of acute cellular rejection.The research of new maintenance long-term immunosuppressive agents focuses on costimulation blockade. Agents inhibiting CD40-CD40 ligand interaction may enable a good control of both T cells and B cells responses. Anti-CD28 antibodies may promote regulatory T cells. Agents targeting this costimulation pathways are currently evaluated in clinical trials.Immunosuppressive agents for ABMR treatment are scarce since anti-CD20 agent rituximab and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have failed to demonstrate an interest in ABMR. New drugs focusing on antibodies removal (imlifidase), B cell and plasmablasts (anti-IL-6/IL-6R, anti-CD38…) and complement inhibition are in the pipeline, with the challenge of their evaluation in such a heterogeneous pathology.     

Conventional Immunosuppression is Compatible with Costimulation Blockade-Based, Mixed Chimerism Tolerance Induction

T-cell costimulatory blockade has emerged as an effective strategy to prevent allograft rejection in experimental models. We and others have reported that the beneficial effects of costimulation blockade can be negated when combined with certain immunosuppressants. The current study evaluates the compatibility of various immunosuppressive agents in a costimulation blockade-based, mixed chimerism tolerance protocol. The addition of conventional agents, including calcineurin inhibitors, did not interfere with tolerance induction. All mice developed multilineage macrochimerism and accepted donor allografts. Analysis of specific T-cell receptor utilization demonstrated selective deletion of donor-reactive T cells. Challenge with donor and third-party allografts confirmed donor-specific tolerance. Clinical introduction of costimulation blockade-based strategies will likely incorporate currently approved immunosuppressive agents. While it has been reported that certain conventional agents are detrimental to costimulation blockade-based strategies, our results suggest that these agents could safely be combined in clinical trials when used as part of a nonmyelosuppressive, mixed chimerism-based tolerance strategy.     

Treatment of lupus nephritis

Patients with lupus nephritis pose a therapeutic challenge and stimulate investigation of innovative treatment strategies. Although patient survival and renal function outcomes have improved over the last 4 decades, contemporary immunosuppressive regimens are not consistently effective and often require extended courses associated with insidious toxicities. Several strategies are under investigation to induce remissions more rapidly and to reduce the risk of long courses of cytotoxic drug therapy. The combination of pulse methylprednisolone and pulse cyclophosphamide may be more effective than pulse cyclophosphamide alone for patients with relatively severe proliferative lupus nephritis. Ongoing clinical studies evaluate the risk/benefit of other intensive induction regimens (eg, combination fludarabine with relatively low-dose pulse cyclophosphamide). A particularly vigorous strategy employs immunoablative cyclophosphamide with or without stem cell rescue. Several studies of sequential immunosuppressive therapy are in progress. It is anticipated that long-term toxicities can be lessened by substituting various maintenance agents (eg, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) after initial cyclophosphamide therapy has induced a renal response. Additional information is needed to determine the role of this strategy. Furthermore, a number of standard and experimental immunosuppressive regimens (that do not include cyclophosphamide) are under investigation as well. Innovative approaches (eg, costimulatory blockade) offer the hope of more effective treatments without the risks of contemporary regimens.     

CD40 blockade combines with CTLA4Ig and sirolimus to produce mixed chimerism in an MHC-defined rhesus macaque transplant model

In murine models, T-cell costimulation blockade of the CD28:B7 and CD154:CD40 pathways synergistically promotes immune tolerance after transplantation. While CD28 blockade has been successfully translated to the clinic, translation of blockade of the CD154:CD40 pathway has been less successful, in large part due to thromboembolic complications associated with anti-CD154 antibodies. Translation of CD40 blockade has also been slow, in part due to the fact that synergy between CD40 blockade and CD28 blockade had not yet been demonstrated in either primate models or humans. Here we show that a novel, nondepleting CD40 monoclonal antibody, 3A8, can combine with combined CTLA4Ig and sirolimus in a well-established primate bone marrow chimerism-induction model. Prolonged engraftment required the presence of all three agents during maintenance therapy, and resulted in graft acceptance for the duration of immunosuppressive treatment, with rejection resulting upon immunosuppression withdrawal. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that upregulation of CD95 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells correlated with rejection, suggesting that CD95 may be a robust biomarker of graft loss. These results are the first to demonstrate prolonged chimerism in primates treated with CD28/mTOR blockade and nondepletional CD40 blockade, and support further investigation of combined costimulation blockade targeting the CD28 and CD40 pathways.     

Rational Development of LEA29Y (belatacept), a High-Affinity Variant of CTLA4-Ig with Potent Immunosuppressive Properties

Current success in organ transplantation is dependent upon the use of calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens. Unfortunately, current immunotherapy targets molecules with ubiquitous expression resulting in devastating non-immune side effects. T-cell costimulation has been identified as a new potential immunosuppressive target. The best characterized pathway includes CD28, its homologue CTLA4 and their ligands CD80 and CD86. While an immunoglobulin fusion protein construct of CTLA4 suppressed rejection in rodents, it lacked efficacy in primate transplant models. In an attempt to increase the biologic potency of the parent molecule a novel, modified version of CTLA4-Ig, LEA29Y (belatacept), was constructed. Two amino acid substitutions (L104E and A29Y) gave rise to slower dissociation rates for both CD86 and CD80. The increased avidity resulted in a 10-fold increase in potency in vitro and significant prolongation of renal allograft survival in a pre-clinical primate model. The use of immunoselective biologics may provide effective maintenance immunosuppression while avoiding the collateral toxicities associated with conventional immunsuppressants.     

Studies Introducing Costimulation Blockade for Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman Primates

Vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) are technically feasible. Similar to other organ transplants, VCAs are hampered by the toxicity and incomplete efficacy associated with conventional immunosuppression. Complications attributable to calcineurin inhibitors remain prevalent in the clinical cases reported to date, and these loom particularly large given the nonlifesaving nature of VCAs. Additionally, acute rejection remains almost ubiquitous, albeit controllable with current agents. Costimulation blockade offers the potential to provide prophylaxis from rejection without the adverse consequences of calcineurin‐based regimens. In this study, we used a nonhuman‐primate model of VCA in conjunction with immunosuppressive regimens containing combinations of B7‐specific costimulation blockade with and without adhesion blockade with LFA3‐Ig to determine what adjunctive role these agents could play in VCA transplantation when combined with more conventional agents. Compared to tacrolimus, the addition of belatacept improved rejection free allograft survival. The combination with LFA3‐Ig reduced CD2^hi memory T cells, however did not provide additional protection against allograft rejection and hindered protective immunity. Histology paralleled clinical histopathology and Banff grading. These data provide the basis for the study of costimulation blockade in VCA in a relevant preclinical model.     

Costimulation blockade and its possible future use in clinical transplantation

The nonimmune effects of currently used immunosuppressive drugs result in a high incidence of late graft loss due to nephrotoxicity and death of patients. As an immune-specific alternative to conventional immunosuppressants, new biotechnology tools can be used to block the costimulation signals of T-cell activation. Many experimental studies--particularly preclinical studies in nonhuman primates--have focused on blocking the 'classical' B7/CD28 and CD40/CD40L pathways, which are critical in primary T-cell activation. Here, we review the limitations, the recent advances and the first large-scale clinical application of the CTLA4-Ig fusion protein to block the B7/CD28 costimulation pathway. We also focus on new B7/CD28 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)/TNF-R family costimulatory molecules that can deliver positive or negative costimulation signals regulating the alloimmune response. Strategies that use single agents to block costimulation have often proved to be insufficient. Given the diversity of the different costimulation molecules, future strategies for human transplantation may involve the simultaneous blockade of several selected pathways or the simultaneous use of conventional immunosuppressants.     

Biologics in organ transplantation

The last two decades have witnessed a pandemic in antibody development, with over 600 entering clinical studies and a total of 28 approved by the FDA and European Union. The incorporation of biologics in transplantation has made a significant impact on allograft survival. Herein, we review the armamentarium of clinical and preclinical biologics used for organ transplantation--with the exception of belatacept--from depleting and IL-2R targeting induction agents to costimulation blockade, B-cell therapeutics, BAFF and complement inhibition, anti-adhesion, and anti-cytokine approaches. While individual agents may be insufficient for tolerance induction, they provide possibilities for reduction of steroid or calcineurin inhibitor use, alternatives to rejection episodes refractory to conventional therapies, and specialized immunosuppression for highly sensitized patients.     

Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in a cardiac transplant patient with chronic renal failure.

Chronic renal failure triggered by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression is a common complication after cardiac transplantation. Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are 2 newer immunosuppressive agents with no documented nephrotoxic side effects. This case report describes a patient with ongoing chronic renal failure 10 months after cardiac transplantation on cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. Conversion of the immunosuppressive regimen from cyclosporine to sirolimus and MMF resulted in freedom from acute rejection, excellent cardiac graft function and consistently improved renal function. This case illustrates the beneficial potential of sirolimus and MMF as CNI-free and safe long-term immunosuppression in a patient with chronic renal failure after heart transplantation.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major concern after renal transplantation. To investigate the safety and efficacy of a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen, 132 live-donor renal transplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and steroids. The patients were randomized to a maintenance immunosuppression regimen that included steroids, sirolimus, and either low-dose tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Over a mean follow-up period of approximately 5 yr, patient and graft survival did not significantly differ between the two maintenance regimens. Patient survival was 93.8% and 98.5% in the tacrolimus/sirolimus and MMF/sirolimus groups, respectively, and graft survival was 83% and 88%, respectively. However, the MMF/sirolimus group had significantly better renal function, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. In addition, this group was less likely to require a change in their primary immunosuppression regimen than the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (20.8% versus 53.8%, P = 0.001). The safety profile was similar between groups. In summary, after long-term follow-up, a CNI-free maintenance regimen consisting of sirolimus, MMF, and steroids was both safe and efficacious among low to moderate immunologic risk renal transplant recipients.     

Steroid and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing protocols in kidney transplantation

Recent improvements in kidney transplantation have been driven largely by lower acute rejection rates attributed to better immunosuppressive agents. In an effort to reduce the long-term toxicities of immunosuppressant drugs, corticosteroid- and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing immunosuppression protocols have become increasingly popular in managing kidney transplant recipients. Nevertheless, these strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic allograft injury (CAI) that may worsen the fate of transplant recipients. This article focuses on steroid and CNI sparing protocols to elucidate their safety and efficacy in patients receiving a kidney transplant. Steroid avoidance protocols are rapidly and increasingly being used. Studies have shown that corticosteroids are not essential to achieve excellent short- and intermediate-term results. However, the role of steroid withdrawal is only marginally beneficial and very often benefit overstated. CNI-sparing strategies have been used to help maintain the balance between allograft survival and nephrotoxicity. Trials evaluating CNI minimization have shown reduced incidence of CAI and preservation of allograft function. CNI withdrawal within 3 to 12 months after kidney transplantation improved graft function despite increased risk of acute rejection. This approach may be feasible with adequate exposure and proper usage of mammalian target of rapamacin inhibitors. Late withdrawal or conversion did not show a clear benefit. Timing and degree of renal dysfunction are key determining factors. With regards to CNI avoidance, earlier trials, such as the Symphony study, did not support the use of a CNI-free regimen of low-dose sirolimus as initial immunosuppression. However, recent studies using costimulatory blockade-based immusouppression showed that CNI avoidance is possible. The best maintenance immunosuppressive with CNI- or steroid-sparing is a work in progress and awaits longer term follow-up. The availability of newer biologics for costimulatory blockade and new immunosuppressive agents with novel mechanisms of action have the potential of using CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols to minimize the incidence of CAI and improve long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.     

Regulation of alloantigen-mediated T-cell proliferation by endogenous interferon-gamma: implications for long-term allograft acceptance.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that interferon (IFN)-gamma is not an essential mediator of acute rejection but, instead, is critical for the induction of long-term allograft acceptance. The in vivo mechanisms by which endogenous IFN-gamma regulates the alloimmune response and thus facilitates the induction of long-term allograft survival are not known. METHODS: We examined long-term cardiac and skin allograft survival, alloantigen-induced T-cell proliferation, and alloantigen-induced T-cell apoptosis in wild-type (IFN-gamma+/+) and IFN-gamma gene-knockout (IFN-gamma-/-) mice treated with either B7-CD28 T-cell costimulation blockade alone or B7-CD28 T-cell costimulation blockade combined with donor splenocyte transfusion. RESULTS: We found that IFN-gamma is essential for long-term allograft survival induced by treating mice with either B7-CD28 T-cell costimulation blockade alone or B7-CD28 T-cell costimulation blockade combined with donor splenocyte transfusion. Alloantigen-induced T-cell proliferation in vivo was significantly greater in IFN-gamma-/- mice than in IFN-gamma+/+ mice, and T-cell costimulation blockade abrogated alloantigen-induced T-cell proliferation in wild-type mice but failed to do so in mice that lack IFN-gamma. In contrast, alloantigen-induced T lymphocyte apoptosis in vivo did not differ between IFN-gamma+/+ and IFN-gamma-/- mice, and T-cell costimulation blockade enhanced alloantigen-induced T-cell apoptosis in both mouse strains. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that endogenous IFN-gamma facilitates the induction of long-term allograft survival by limiting the proliferation of alloactivated T lymphocytes. The data also suggest that B7-CD28 T-cell costimulation blockade exerts immunosuppressive actions by inhibiting the proliferation of activated T lymphocytes and by promoting their apoptosis.     

Increased intracellular pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage T cells of stable lung transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation and is associated with an increased expression of T-cell proinflammatory cytokines. We have recently shown that peripheral blood T-cell proinflammatory cytokine production was significantly reduced in stable lung transplant patients consistent with immunosuppression therapy. However, analysis of inflammatory cytokine profiles in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) T cells may be more relevant than peripheral blood T cells for assessing graft status. METHODS: To investigate the immunomodulatory effects of currently used immunosuppressive regimens on BAL T-cell cytokine production, whole blood and BAL from stable lung transplant patients and control volunteers was stimulated in vitro and cytokine production by CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell subsets determined using multiparameter flow cytometry. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in T-cell proinflammatory cytokine production in BAL compared with blood from control subjects but not transplant patients. Anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4 was increased in BAL compared with blood from both groups. There was a significant increase in IFNgamma, IL-2, IL-4, TGFbeta, and TNFalpha production by CD8 T cells and IFNgamma and TNFalpha production by CD4 T cells in BAL from transplant patients compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown decreased T-cell pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production in BAL compared with blood in control subjects but not in stable lung transplant patients. Current immunosuppression protocols have limited effect on T-cell proinflammatory cytokine production in BAL but do upregulate anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and TGFbeta. Drugs that effectively reduce T-cell proinflammatory cytokine production in BAL may improve current protocols for reducing graft rejection in these patients.     

Outcomes Following De Novo CNI-Free Immunosuppression After Heart Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Renal impairment at the time of heart transplantation complicates the choice of subsequent immunosuppressive therapy. Calcineurin (CNI)-free regimens utilizing proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI) may mitigate against nephrotoxicity in this group; however, their effectiveness remains unclear.
We present our 7-year experience with de novo CNI-free, PSI-based immunosuppression after heart transplantation. Of the 152 patients transplanted between July 1999 and July 2006, de novo immunosuppression regimens were 49 CNI-free, PSI-based, 88 CNI, 15 combination of CNI+PSI.
Pretransplant creatinine clearance improved within 6 months in the PSI group (0.69 ± 0.34 mL/s vs. 1.00 ± 0.54 mL/s, p < 0.05) but not the CNI (1.32 ± 0.54 mL/s vs. 1.36 ± 0.53 mL/s, p = ns) or CNI+PSI (1.20 ± 0.24 mL/s vs. 1.20 ± 0.41 mL/s, p = ns) groups. The PSI group had more episodes of early (≤6 months) acute rejection, bacterial or fungal infections and pleural effusions but less CMV infection (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Early CNI addition occurred in 37% of the PSI group for acute rejection. 33% of the entire cohort changed immunosuppression regimens over 3.6 ± 2.2 years follow-up.
De novo CNI-free, PSI-based immunosuppression in patients with significant renal dysfunction allowed significant posttransplantation renal recovery but with increased early acute rejection, bacterial and fungal infections and pleural effusions.     

Successful conversion from conventional immunosuppression to anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody costimulatory molecule blockade in rhesus renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Several conventional forms of immunosuppression have been shown to antagonize the efficacy of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody- (mAb) based costimulatory molecule blockade immunotherapy. Our objective was to determine if allograft recipients treated with a conventional immunosuppressive regimen could be sequentially converted to anti-CD154 mAb monotherapy without compromising graft survival. METHODS: Outbred juvenile rhesus monkeys underwent renal allotransplantation from MHC-disparate donors. After a 60-day course of triple therapy immunosuppression with steroids, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil, monkeys were treated with: (1) cessation of all immunosuppression (control); (2) seven monthly doses of 20 mg/kg hu5C8 (maintenance), or; (3) 20 mg/kg hu5C8 on posttransplant days 60, 61, 64, 71, 79, and 88 followed by five monthly doses (induction+maintenance). Graft rejection was defined by elevation in serum creatinine>1.5 mg/dl combined with histologic evidence of rejection. RESULTS: Graft survival for the three groups were as follows: group 1 (control): 70, 75, >279 days; group 2 (maintenance): 83, 349, >293 days, and; group 3 (induction+maintenance): 355, >377, >314 days. Acute rejection developing in two of four monkeys after treatment with conventional immunosuppression was successfully reversed with intensive hu5C8 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Renal allograft recipients can be successfully converted to CD154 blockade monotherapy after 60 days of conventional immunosuppression. An induction phase of anti-CD154 mAb appears to be necessary for optimal conversion. Therefore, although concurrent administration of conventional immunosuppressive agents including steroids and calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to inhibit the efficacy of CD154 blockade, sequential conversion from these agents to CD154 blockade appears to be effective.     

Novel strategies in immunosuppression: issues in perspective

Recent findings suggest that a chronic alloimmune response is playing the dominant role in late allograft loss, challenging the notion that most grafts are lost due to the inexorable progression of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. CNIs have failed to improve long-term outcomes and are associated with multiple metabolic derangements. Thus, improvement in long-term allograft outcomes may depend on new agents with novel mechanisms of action, devoid of the toxicities associated with CNIs. To meet this need, inhibitors of novel pathways in B cell and plasma cell activation have emerged to combat the humoral immune response including belimumab and atacicept, both promising targets of B-cell survival factors and bortezomib and eculizumab, agents currently in trials for desensitization protocols and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Promising agents for maintenance immunosuppression, used as monotherapy or synergistically, include monoclonal antibodies and fusion receptor proteins targeting the CD40-CD154 pathway (multiple anti-CD40 antibodies), the CD28-CD80/86 pathway (i.e., belatacept), the LFA3-CD2 pathway (i.e., alefacept), and small molecules such as tofacitinib, a janus kinase 1/3 inhibitor. The induction of allograft tolerance has been attempted with some success with simultaneous bone marrow/kidney transplantation from the same donor, albeit, limited by its associated toxicites. Finally, the exciting fields of tissue engineering and stem cell biology with the repopulation of decellularized organs is ushering in a new paradigm for transplantation. The era of simplified immunosuppression regimens devoid of toxicities is upon us with the promise of dramatic improvement in long term survival.     

Clinical Trials of Transplant Tolerance: Slow But Steady Progress

The search for tolerance therapies that would thwart the alloimmune response following organ transplantation while preserving a patient's protective immune response has been a formidable goal for clinical immunologists. Over the past few decades, a more detailed understanding of the molecular events associated with T-cell recognition and activation has demonstrated the feasibility of various tolerance approaches, such as costimulation blockade, in numerous animal models of both autoimmunity and transplantation. Yet, only a few promising new therapies have reached the early stages of human clinical development. In contrast, the use of T-cell depleting induction therapy has become widespread, and new trials have been designed with immunosuppressive drug withdrawal in mind. Furthermore, nonmyeloablative mixed chimeric approaches have allowed complete immunosuppressive withdrawal in some limited cases. In the course of these investigations, however, what has become increasingly clear is that the distinctions between immunosuppression and tolerance have been blurred as the success and durability of the therapies rely as much on the state of the organ and organism as they do the mechanism of action of the drug. In this review, we provide a summary of the progress and lessons in promoting clinical transplant tolerance and an overview of promising agents.