The economics of topical immunomodulators for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a common, chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease frequently affecting infants and children. The worldwide prevalence of atopic dermatitis is estimated to be 5--20% of the paediatric population. First-line therapy has generally consisted of dry skin care, avoidance of triggers, application of topical corticosteroids, and administration of antihistamines and oral antibacterials. Topical corticosteroids improve the lesions of atopic dermatitis; however, concern on the part of physicians and patients regarding adverse effects has led to reluctance to utilise topical corticosteroids early and especially for prolonged periods. Topical immunomodulators (TIMs), including tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream, were recently introduced for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.Clinical data show that TIMs are effective in atopic dermatitis, yet do not cause the significant adverse effects associated with topical corticosteroids. Questions remain regarding the place of TIMs as a treatment for atopic dermatitis and how to use them most effectively, from both therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic standpoints. Specifically, two major issues remain unresolved: (i) how TIMs measure up to other therapies, especially topical corticosteroids; and (ii) how members of the TIM drug class compare against each other.Previous research has established that atopic dermatitis has a significant impact on quality of life (QOL) and carries a substantial economic burden. Some studies have also measured the utility of various atopic dermatitis disease states. While there is a need for further research, early economic studies provide evidence that TIMs positively affect the QOL of patients and families. In certain patients, TIMs may be cost effective and have an acceptable incremental cost utility compared with topical corticosteroids.Making cost-effectiveness comparisons between tacrolimus and pimecrolimus is challenging because there are limited head-to-head comparative data. Given currently available efficacy data, the results of one study suggest that tacrolimus may be more cost effective than pimecrolimus in paediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis.The full economic and QOL benefits of both agents are yet to be completely understood. The studies reviewed herein are the first to delineate the pharmacoeconomic benefits of TIMs in atopic dermatitis, and lay the foundation for future analyses. TIMs represent an exciting advance in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Additional research will help determine the proper place of TIMs among the current array of therapeutic options for atopic dermatitis.     

Pimecrolimus: new preparation. Me-too: too many risks, not beneficial enough in atopic dermatitis

(1) Symptomatic treatment of atopic dermatitis is initially based on simple measures and moisturising creams. Topical corticosteroids are reserved for treatment of inflammatory exacerbations. (2) After topical tacrolimus, marketing authorisation has been granted in France for a second topical immunosuppressant, pimecrolimus, as a short-term symptomatic treatment for atopic dermatitis in children from the age of two years, and intermittently for long-term prevention of new exacerbations. (3) Short-term treatment with pimecrolimus has been tested in three trials in children with mild to moderate dermatitis (against the excipient), in one adult trial against the excipient, and in one dose-finding study in adults that included a group treated with topical corticosteroids. (4) Longer term treatment periods of 6 to 12 months have been tested in two trials versus excipient in children, and two adult trials, one versus moderately active topical corticosteroids. (5) These trials show that pimecrolimus works better than the excipient, but not nearly as well as moderately active topical corticosteroids. Pimecrolimus has not been compared with topical corticosteroids in children, the age group most vulnerable to atopic dermatitis. (6) The commonest adverse effects observed in clinical trials were local and included a burning sensation at the site of application and skin infections. Systemic adverse effects (mainly infections) were most marked in infants. Long-term risks, especially the risk of skin cancer, have not been assessed. (7) In practice, the reference treatment for exacerbations of atopic dermatitis is a topical corticosteroid; in children, it seems best to begin with a weak preparation. There is no reason to use pimecrolimus, which is less active than topical corticosteroids and whose potential long-term adverse effects, especially in children, are unknown.     

Atopic dermatitis: understanding the disease and its management

ABSTRACT

Objective: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, inflammatory skin disease that can significantly reduce the quality of life of not only patients but also entire families. This review will focus on the currently available non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments for the control and management of AD.

Research design and methods: A review of English-language articles from January 1953 to May 2006 was performed within the MEDLINE database. Search terms included, but were not limited to, atopic dermatitis, topical corticosteroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Studies evaluating the diagnosis, physical and psychological burden, and underlying pathophysiology of AD were included. Particular focus was placed on literature presenting key safety and efficacy data from clinical trials involving AD treatment.

Results: Although good skin care and trigger avoidance are fundamental to AD management, most patients also require pharmacologic intervention. Topical therapies comprise the foundation of AD treatment. In particular, topical corticosteroids have been a mainstay in AD treatment for several decades and the newer topical calcineurin inhibitors have become a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium. TCIs are a safe and effective AD treatment; they limit the number of disease flares, extend the time between flares, and provide a steroid-sparing option that may be of particular benefit in the pediatric population. The use of more potent therapies, such as systemic (oral/injected) agents or phototherapy, is typically limited to the treatment of severe, refractory disease. Additionally, owing to the increased risk for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in patients with AD, topical or systemic antimicrobials are an important component of treatment.

Limitations: Case reports and small-scale studies were typically not included in this analysis and owing to the limited number of trials evaluating TCSs, consensus statements and comprehensive review articles were used to obtain information pertaining to the use of this treatment in AD.

Conclusions: AD is a common, chronic disease requiring a long-term management strategy that incorporates preventive measures and a multipronged treatment approach.     

Pharmacological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies currently available for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS).A literature search using MEDLINE from 1966 through to April 2005 and a hand search of abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) meetings for 2001 through to 2004 were performed. References of articles retrieved were also searched.The MEDLINE search yielded 570 citations and 157 abstracts from ACR were identified. Eighty-four studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs); 53 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (pharmacological treatment of AS and RCT) and were included in this review. Statistical pooling of data was not performed because of the disparate outcome measures used. Eight RCTs found nonselective NSAIDs and two RCTs found cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2-selective NSAIDs to be superior to placebo for relief of pain and improvement in physical function. Twenty-nine RCTs showed comparable efficacy and safety between nonselective NSAIDs. One RCT showed no difference between methylprednisolone 1g and 375 mg. Seven RCTs assessing the efficacy of sulfasalazine (sulphasalazine) and two RCTs of methotrexate provided contradictory evidence as to their benefit for treatment of AS. One RCT showed intravenous pamidronate 60 mg to be more effective than 10mg intravenously for the treatment of axial pain. All six RCTs of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents demonstrated superiority to placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral symptoms.Nonselective as well as COX-2-selective NSAIDs can be used for pain control in patients with AS. Other proven treatment options include sulfasalazine for the treatment of peripheral joint symptoms, while limited evidence supports the use of pamidronate or methotrexate, which require further studies. Anti-TNFalpha agents have been found very effective for the treatment of both peripheral and axial symptoms in patients with AS, but their use is limited by cost and uncertainty over long-term efficacy and safety.     

Successful treatment of severe refractory atopic dermatitis with efalizumab

Despite multiple therapeutic modalities, treatment of atopic dermatitis with its chronic, relapsing nature remains a challenge. Chronic use of standard therapies is associated with variable efficacy and potential side effects. Targeted therapeutic approaches using biologic agents may prove to be a novel alternative. We present a case of severe recalcitrant atopic dermatitis successfully treated with efalizumab.     

Safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate in the topical treatment of skin diseases

Fluticasone propionate - the first carbothioate corticosteroid - has been classified as a potent anti-inflammatory drug for dermatological use. It is available as 0.05% cream and 0.005% ointment formulations for the acute and maintenance treatment of patients with dermatological disorders such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and vitiligo. This glucocorticoid is characterized by high lipophilicity, high glucocorticoid receptor binding and activation, and a rapid metabolic turnover in skin. Although skin blanching following fluticasone propionate exceeds that of corticosteroids of medium strength, several clinical trials demonstrate a low potential for cutaneous and systemic side-effects, even in difficult-to-treat areas like the face, the eyelids and intertriginous areas. Even among paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis, fluticasone propionate proved to be safe and effective. These pharmacological and clinical properties are reflected by the high therapeutic index of this glucocorticoid.     

Novel immunomodulators for topical skin disease therapy

The use of topical corticosteroids has revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. However, problems including pharmacological resistance, as well as the side effect profile of potent topical corticosteroids, has prompted studies to investigate into other topical non-corticosteroidal agents in inflammatory skin diseases. This review outlines the major types of inflammatory skin diseases and discusses emerging therapies based on topical immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotics. In particular, tacrolimus and ascomycin derivatives have been shown to be effective for treating atopic dermatitis with a surprising lack of side effects. It is expected that these agents will play an important role in future dermatological therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests the importance of lipid-derived mediators of inflammation (eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor) in cutaneous inflammatory diseases. The role of these mediators in skin inflammation is also addressed in this review. Though there appears to be a large amount of redundancy in the activities of these lipid mediators, this family of agents could potentially serve as targets for anti-inflammatory therapy. Inasmuch as the phospholipase A(2) family of enzymes serve to synthesise both eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor, inhibition at this step could have important therapeutic benefits in designing therapy for inflammatory skin diseases.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with topical corticosteroids in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: review of randomised, double-blind clinical studies conducted in Japan

Tacrolimus (FK506) ointment is widely used in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis. The drug exerts its action by down-regulating antigen-specific T-cell activities and associated proinflammatory cytokine production. A number of clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment compared with vehicle or topical corticosteroids in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. These studies have suggested that topical tacrolimus has a rapid onset of action and exerts sustained therapeutic effects, with an efficacy similar to that of moderate to potent topical corticosteroids, but without causing skin atrophy. Two phase III randomised, controlled clinical trials have been conducted in Japanese adult patients with atopic dermatitis to compare the efficacy and safety of topical 0.1% tacrolimus with topical corticosteroid ointments. In the first study, patients with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis on the trunk and extremities were randomised to 3 weeks of treatment with topical 0.1% tacrolimus or the mid-potency topical corticosteroid 0.12% betamethasone valerate. Over 90% of the patients in each study group experienced at least a moderate improvement at the end of the study. In the second study, patients with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis on the head or neck were randomised to 1 week of treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus or the mild-potency corticosteroid 0.1% alclometasone dipropionate. Significantly greater improvements in individual symptom scores were observed with topical tacrolimus compared with alclometasone dipropionate, with overall global improvement at 1 week being statistically superior with tacrolimus. Furthermore, in a long-term open-label study involving 568 patients, at least a moderate global improvement in symptoms was observed in 85% of patients at 6 weeks, increasing to 91% at both 26 weeks and 52 weeks; this rate was maintained throughout the 2-year duration of the study. 0.1% tacrolimus ointment was considered to be safe in the majority of patients. The most prevalent adverse reactions were local application site irritations, which generally resolved with continued therapy. In summary, these findings suggest that 0.1% tacrolimus ointment is an effective and safe nonsteroidal alternative therapy for adult patients with atopic dermatitis.     

Novel immunomodulators for topical skin disease therapy

The use of topical corticosteroids has revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. However, problems including pharmacological resistance, as well as the side effect profile of potent topical corticosteroids, has prompted studies to investigate into other topical non-corticosteroidal agents in inflammatory skin diseases. This review outlines the major types of inflammatory skin diseases and discusses emerging therapies based on topical immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotics. In particular, tacrolimus and ascomycin derivatives have been shown to be effective for treating atopic dermatitis with a surprising lack of side effects. It is expected that these agents will play an important role in future dermatological therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests the importance of lipid-derived mediators of inflammation (eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor) in cutaneous inflammatory diseases. The role of these mediators in skin inflammation is also addressed in this review. Though there appears to be a large amount of redundancy in the activities of these lipid mediators, this family of agents could potentially serve as targets for anti-inflammatory therapy. Inasmuch as the phospholipase A₂ family of enzymes serve to synthesise both eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor, inhibition at this step could have important therapeutic benefits in designing therapy for inflammatory skin diseases.     

Highly selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for the treatment of allergic skin diseases and psoriasis

The phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 is the predominant cyclic AMP degrading enzyme in a variety of inflammatory cells including eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, T cells and monocytes. In addition, this enzyme is expressed in non-immune cells such as keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Highly selective PDE4 inhibitors are currently under evaluation for the treatment of asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Due to the broad anti-inflammatory/immuno-modulatory action of PDE4 inhibitors, it has been proposed that PDE4 inhibitors might also be efficacious for skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis. Consequently, PDE4 inhibitors including cilomilast and AWD 12-281 have been tested in several models of allergic and irritant skin inflammation. These PDE4 inhibitors displayed strong anti-inflammatory action in models of allergic contact dermatitis in mice, in the arachidonic acid induced skin inflammation in mice and in ovalbumin sensitised guinea pigs. The determination of cytokines in skin homogenates revealed that both Th1 as well as Th2 cytokines are suppressed by PDE4 inhibitors, indicating an anti-inflammatory activity in both the Th2 dominated acute phase as well as the Th1 dominated chronic phase of atopic dermatitis. Due to the suppression of Th1 cytokines, activity can also be expected in psoriasis. Results of early clinical trials with both topically (cipamfylline, CP80,633) and systemically (CC-10004) active PDE4 inhibitors demonstrated efficacy in atopic dermatitis and in the case of CC-10004, also in psoriasis. AWD 12-281 (GW 842470) is currently under clinical evaluation for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. Results concerning clinical efficacy of this potent and selective PDE4 inhibitor are anxiously awaited.     

Examining the roles of cannabinoids in pain and other therapeutic indications: a review

Importance of the field: In recent times, our knowledge of cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system has greatly advanced. With expanding knowledge, synthetic cannabinoids – including nabilone, dronabinol and a combination of synthetic Δ9-THC and cannabidiol – have been developed and tested for benefit in a variety of therapeutic indications.

Areas covered in this review: The aim of this article is to provide a summative review of the vast amount of clinical trial data now available on these agents.

What the reader will gain: To locate clinical trials for review, a literature search was performed using PubMed between the dates of 25 May and 30 June 2009. Search parameters were set to isolate only human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and 2009. Keywords consistently used for each search include: cannabinoids, marijuana, THC, nabilone and dronabinol. Preferential selection was given to the best-designed trials, focusing on placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs with the largest patient populations, if available.

Take home message: As efficacy and tolerability of these agents remain questionable, it is important that cannabinoids not be considered ‘first-line’ therapies for conditions for which there are more supported and better-tolerated agents. Instead, these agents could be considered in a situation of treatment failure with standard therapies or as adjunctive agents where appropriate.     

Use of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in thin and sensitive skin areas

ABSTRACT

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic skin disorder characterized by itch and dry skin, which can develop into pruritic red plaques that ooze when scratched. AD flares often occur in anatomic areas where the skin is naturally thin (the face, neck, and intertriginous zones). Such regions, especially the face, are also areas of sensitive skin and need special consideration when being treated.

Objective: This article will briefly review the concepts of thin and sensitive skin and discuss the treatment of AD in such areas.

Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for English-language articles published that contained the text terms atopic dermatitis, sensitive skin, treatment, topical corticosteroids, or topical calcineurin inhibitors. Articles that pertained to the safety and efficacy of various treatments were selected for further review.

Results: Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are effective for the treatment of AD in thin and sensitive skin areas, but their use is limited due to adverse events, such as skin thinning, and the potential for impairing the skin barrier. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) also provide effective AD treatment without impairing the skin barrier or inducing skin thinning. Although TCIs may be associated with a higher incidence of application-site reactions such as pruritus and skin burning, these symptoms are typically transient and mild to moderate in nature.

Limitations: This analysis focused primarily on relatively recent key trials evaluating the treatment of AD in sensitive skin; due to the limited number of controlled trials evaluating TCS agents, consensus statements and comprehensive review articles were used for most of the information pertaining to this therapeutic option.

Conclusions: Although both TCSs and TCIs have a place in a long-term, comprehensive treatment strategy for AD, TCIs may have a particular use in thin and sensitive skin areas.     

靶向药物治疗儿童中重度特应性皮炎的临床研究进展

特应性皮炎(atopic dermatitis,AD)是一种以湿疹和皮肤瘙痒为特征的慢性皮肤病,是儿童最常见的皮肤病之一。AD的治疗目前以药物治疗为主,但儿童患者尤其是中重度AD患者的治疗需求尚未被完全满足,安全、有效的长期治疗方案仍待探索实践。以生物制剂和小分子抑制剂为代表的靶向药物是治疗中重度特应性皮炎的新兴药物,本文检索近年来国内外相关文献,分别从生物制剂和小分子抑制剂两方面进行综述,为儿童中重度特应性皮炎靶向药物的进一步开发与应用提供参考。     

Clobetasol propionate emollient formulation foam in the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses

Background: Topical corticosteroids are the most common treatment modality for patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis; however, the efficacy of topical corticosteroids is often hampered by barriers to patient adherence, such as lack of efficacy, side effects and inconvenience. Recently published studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of a novel emollient foam (EF) formulation of clobetasol propionate (CP), a class I topical corticosteroid in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Objectives: To summarize recent literature on CP EF foam, and to evaluate recent Phase II and III clinical trials of CP EF foam in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Methods: The MEDLINE (1950 – January 2008) database was searched using the following terms: ‘clobetasol propionate foam’, ‘topical corticosteroids’, ‘topical glucocorticoids’, ‘psoriasis’ and ‘atopic dermatitis’. Results were evaluated for relevance and quality, and additional references were obtained from bibliographies of selected articles. Conclusion: CP EF foam appears to be safe and effective for corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses in adults and children ≥ 12 years of age. As compared to its hydroethanolic foam predecessor, CP EF presents a potential advance for patients who are less likely to tolerate alcohol-based foam. As alcohol-based foams can be irritating and cause stinging in non-hair-bearing areas, this new emollient formulation has the potential to widen the use of CP foam to more patients with atopic dermatitis and to more non-scalp body sites in patients with psoriasis.     

Topical steroids for atopic dermatitis in primary care

Atopic dermatitis is very common. In most instances, the condition is relatively mild and can be managed in primary care. Topical corticosteroids are the standard therapy for controlling acute 'flares' of dermatitis. However, poor communication between doctors and patients often results in suboptimal use of such therapy. Here, we review the efficacy and safety of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. We discuss their optimal use in primary care, and the advice and information that patients or parents of children need when using such treatment.     

Pharmacological strategies to decrease transfusion requirements in patients undergoing surgery

Surgical procedures are inevitably associated with bleeding. The amount of blood loss may vary widely between different surgical procedures and depends on surgical as well as non-surgical factors. Whereas adequate surgical haemostasis may suffice in most patients, pro-haemostatic pharmacological agents may be of additional benefit in patients with (diffuse) surgical bleeding or in patients with a specific underlying haemostatic defect. In general, surgical haemostasis and pharmacological therapies can be complementary in controlling blood loss. The use of pharmacological therapies to reduce blood loss and blood transfusions in surgery has historically been restricted to a few drugs. Antifibrinolytic agents (aprotinin, tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid) have the best evidence supporting their use, especially in cardiac surgery, liver transplantation and some orthopaedic surgical procedures. Meta-analyses of randomised, controlled trials in cardiac patients have suggested a slight benefit of aprotinin, compared with the other antifibrinolytics. Desmopressin is the treatment of choice in patients with mild haemophilia A and von Willebrand disease. It has also been shown to be effective in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who received aspirin up to the time of operation. However, overall evidence does not support a beneficial effect of desmopressin in patients without pre-existing coagulopathy undergoing elective surgical procedures. Topical agents, such as fibrin sealants have been successfully used in a variety of surgical procedures. However, only very few controlled clinical trials have been performed and scientific evidence supporting their use is still limited. Novel drugs, like recombinant factor VIIa (eptacog alfa), are currently under clinical investigation. Recombinant factor VIIa has been introduced for the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors, either in surgical or non-surgical situations. Preliminary data indicate that it may also be effective in surgical patients without pre-existing coagulation abnormalities. More clinical trials are warranted before definitive conclusions can be drawn about the safety and the exact role of this new drug in surgical patients. Only adequately powered and properly designed randomised, clinical trials will allow us to define the most effective and the safest pharmacological therapies for reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in surgical patients. Future trials should also consider cost-effectiveness because of considerable differences in the costs of the available pro-haemostatic pharmacological agents.     

Systematic review: the efficacy of treatments for irritable bowel syndrome--a European perspective

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common, chronic disorder, characterized by abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating and altered bowel habit. AIM: To conduct a systematic evidence-based review of pharmacological therapies currently used, or in clinical development, for the treatment of IBS in Europe. The safety and tolerability of these therapies are the subject of an accompanying review. METHODS: A literature search was completed for randomized controlled studies which included adult patients with IBS and an active or placebo control, assessed IBS symptoms, and were published in English between January 1980 and June 2005. The level of evidence for efficacy was graded according to the quality of the trial design and the study outcome. RESULTS: There is some evidence for improvement of individual IBS symptoms with antidiarrhoeals (diarrhoea), antispasmodics (abdominal pain/discomfort), bulking agents (constipation), tricyclic antidepressants (abdominal pain/discomfort) and behavioural therapy. In contrast, there is strong evidence for the improvement of global IBS symptoms with two new serotonergic agents: the 5-HT4 selective agonist tegaserod (IBS with constipation) and the 5-HT3 antagonist alosetron (IBS with diarrhoea). Further data are required for the 5-HT3 antagonist, cilansetron, and the mixed 5-HT3 antagonist/5-HT4 agonist renzapride before their utility in IBS can be appraised. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence for the efficacy, safety and tolerability of therapies currently available in Europe for the treatment of IBS. Overall, there is an absence of pharmacological agents licensed specifically for the treatment of IBS subtypes, and new agents are awaited in Europe that will allow changes in clinical practice to focus on and improve global IBS symptoms.     

Current investigational drugs in psoriasis

INTRODUCTION: The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. Increased understanding of immunogenetic pathways has allowed for the development of more selective targeted biologic therapies. Multiple new treatments are currently in development for the treatment of psoriasis. Preliminary data for many of these agents, particularly with regard to agents targeting the IL-23/Th17 pathway, are promising. Proven long-term safety, however, is an absolute necessity with newly developed drugs, and should, therefore, still be considered second-line agents to current established treatments with long-term safety data. AREAS COVERED: This review details the mechanisms of action of drugs currently in development or in clinical trials for the treatment of psoriasis, using clinical trial registries and associated publications. Readers will gain a comprehensive overview about the mechanism of action of emerging treatments targeting various immune pathways deeply involved in psoriasis. Pathogenesis, clinical efficacy and safety data for these treatments are discussed where available. EXPERT OPINION: Psoriasis remains a heavily undertreated systemic immune-mediated disease despite increased understanding of immunopathogenesis of the disease and advent of a multitude of novel therapeutic agents with potentially improved bioavailability and safety profiles. Limitations, however, remain in the realm of topical agents for treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis, which has seen little progress over the years. A concerted effort will need to be made among researchers, clinicians and patient advocacy groups to ensure new therapeutic agents are developed and gain proper exposure.     

Review article: the role of non-biological drugs in refractory inflammatory bowel disease

Background Up to one‐third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not respond to, or are intolerant of conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Although biological agents are alternative treatments, they may not be suitable or available to some patients. Aim To review the evidence for use of nonbiological drugs in the treatment of patients with IBD refractory to corticosteroids or thiopurines. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed for English language publications with predetermined search criteria to identify relevant studies. Results Published evidence from uncontrolled series and controlled clinical trials has been used to produce a practical approach relevant to clinical practice which incorporates the indication, optimal dose, and side effects of various therapies including tacrolimus, methotrexate, thalidomide, tioguanine, mycophenolate mofotil, leucocyte apheresis, nutritional therapy, antibiotics, probiotics, allopurinol, rectal acetarsol and ciclosporin in the treatment of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Approaches to optimise thiopurine efficacy are also discussed. Conclusions Patients with IBD refractory to corticosteroids or thiopurines may respond to alternative anti‐inflammatory chemical molecules, but the evidence base for many of these alternatives is limited and further trials are needed.