Establishing Early Enteral Nutrition With the Use of Self‐Advancing Postpyloric Feeding Tube in Critically Ill Children

Introduction: Early nutrition support is an integral part of the care of critically ill children. Early enteral nutrition (EN) improves nitrogen balance and prevents bacterial translocation and gut mucosal atrophy. Adequate EN is often not achieved as gastric feeds are not tolerated and placing postpyloric feeding tubes can be difficult. Spontaneous transpyloric passage of standard feeding tubes without endoscopic intervention or use of anesthesia can range from 30%?80%. The authors report on their experience with a 14Fr polyurethane self‐advancing jejunal feeding tube in a pediatric population. These tubes have been used in the adult population with success, but to the authors’ knowledge, there have been no reports of its use in the pediatric age group. Case Series: The authors present 7 critically ill patients 8–19 years old, admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, in whom prolonged recovery, inability to tolerate gastric feeds, and dependence on ventilator were predicted at the outset. The jejunal feeding tube was successfully placed on first attempt at the bedside in all 7 patients within the first 24 hours without the use of a promotility agent or endoscopic intervention. Nutrition goal achieved within 48 hours of feeding tube placement was reported for each patient. This case series demonstrates that children fed via the small bowel reached their nutrition goal earlier and did not require parenteral nutrition. Conclusion: The self‐advancing jejunal feeding tube can be used effectively to establish early EN in critically ill children.     

Enteral access for nutrition in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enteral nutrition is the preferred route for nutrition support in the intensive care unit setting. This is usually delivered through nasoenteric feeding tubes in patients with an otherwise functional gastrointestinal tract. Placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes, however, may be difficult in this setting. Nasoenteric feeding tubes may be placed by multiple methods, each with their particular advantages and disadvantages. This review summarizes the recent literature on different methods of nasoenteric feeding tube placement with emphasis on critically ill patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Bedside assisted methods using electromyogram, electrocardiogram, and magnetic fields to provide immediate positional feedback to help guide tube advancement appear promising. Bedside methods using specific protocols, modified feeding tubes, prokinetics or magnetic assistance were also successfully reported. None of these methods has been prospectively compared with more commonly practiced methods in large studies. Endoscopic nasoenteric tube placement methods including transnasal approaches using ultra-thin endoscopes have been recently described and appear to be equivalent to fluoroscopic placement. All these recently reported techniques, however, may require more specialized equipment or training than is currently widely available. SUMMARY: Feeding tubes can be placed using bedside, fluoroscopic, and endoscopic means. Novel bedside methods have been recently described using immediate positional feedback or new assistive methods. Endoscopic techniques have similar success rates to fluoroscopic techniques and provide data on upper gastrointestinal abnormalities. There is no clear universal standard method. When feeding tube placement is required the technique used depends on local institutional resources and expertise.     

Placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes using magnetic guidance: retesting a new technique

OBJECTIVE: To study a new technique of intubating the small bowel using a newly developed nasoenteral feeding tube fitted with a magnet in its tip and guided for placement with an external magnet. METHODS: The study was performed in medical and surgical wards of a university-affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs hospital on 42 patients referred by their attending physicians for tube placement. The newly designed feeding tube was inserted per nares into the stomach using traditional technique. As the tube was advanced, movement of the hand-held steering magnet was designed to guide the tip of the magnetic nasoenteral tube along the lesser curvature of the stomach, through the pyloric sphincter, and into the duodenum. Portable abdominal radiography confirmed the anatomic location of the tube tip. RESULTS: Fifty-one intubations were performed on 42 subjects. In 45 intubations (88%), tubes passed into the duodenum. Twenty-seven (53%) met criteria for optimal placement in the second portion of the duodenum or distally. Six of 11 tubes (55%) that were not optimally placed were advanced to the distal duodenum on repositioning. Median procedure time for the initial intubations was 30 minutes (interquartile range 15-40). Median procedure time for last 10 intubations improved to 13 minutes (interquartile range 5-20). No complications were related to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral feeding tube placement using external magnetic guidance is a promising, novel technique which is deserving of further study.     

Improved design of nasogastric feeding tubes

Disappointed with the overall performance of weighted and unweighted nasogastric feeding tubes, a design programme was initiated which resulted in the development of two new nasogastric tubes, one weighted and one unweighted. The tubes were manufactured with polyurethane rather than polyvinylchloride (PVC) which permitted an increase in diameter of the internal lumen which in turn was coated with water activated lubricant to ease removal of the introducer wire. A specially modelled outflow port was incorporated into the tips of both tubes. The performance of the two new polyurethane nasogastric feeding tubes was assessed under controlled trial condition using as a reference a widely used PVC unweighted open ended tube. While intubation times were similar in patients without concurrent endotracheal intubation, it took a significantly shorter time to intubate patients with concurrent endotracheal intubation with the new weighted tube. Following tube intubation, it was possible to aspirate gastric contents significantly more often through the new polyurethane tubes (p < 0.001) than through the PVC tube, and the unweighted polyurethane tube stayed in situ longer (p < 0.05) than the PVC tube. The newly designed polyurethane nasogastric feeding tubes are the first tubes that have been shown to have advantages over the simpler type of open ended, unweighted PVC nasogastric feeding tubes.     

Tube-feeding versus hand-feeding nursing home residents with advanced dementia: a cost comparison

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs associated with caring for severely demented residents nursing homes with and without feeding tubes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A 700-bed long-term care facility in Boston Participants: Nursing home residents aged 65 years and over with advanced dementia and eating problems for whom long-term feeding tube had been discussed as a treatment option. Measurements: Costs were compared over the 6 months that followed the tube-feeding decision for those residents who did and did not undergo feeding tube placement for the following items: nursing time, physician assessments, food, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, diagnostic tests, treatment with antibiotics and parenteral hydration, and feeding tube insertion. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects were included, 11 were tube-fed (mean age 84.3 years +/- 6.0) and 11 were hand-fed (mean age 90.2 years +/- 9.1). The daily costs of nursing home care were higher for the residents without feeding tubes compared with residents with tubes ($4219 +/- 1546 vs $2379 +/- 1032, P = 0.006). Nonetheless, Medicaid reimbursement to nursing homes in at least 26 states is higher for demented residents who are tube-fed than for residents with similar deficits who are not tube-fed. Costs typically billed to Medicare were greater for the tube-fed patients ($6994 +/- 5790 vs. $959 +/- 591, P < 0.001), primarily because of the high costs associated with initial feeding tube placement and hospitalizations or emergency rooms visits for the management of complications of tube-feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing homes are faced with a potential fiscal incentive to tube-feed residents with advanced dementia: tube-fed residents generate a higher daily reimbursement rate from Medicaid, yet require less expensive nursing home care. From a Medicare perspective, tube-fed patients are expensive due to the high costs associated with feeding tube placement and acute management of complications. Further work is needed to determine whether these potential financial incentives influence tube-feeding decisions in practice.     

A randomized controlled trial comparing three different techniques of nasojejunal feeding tube placement in critically ill children

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare 3 different techniques used to place nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tubes in the critically ill or injured pediatric patients. This was a randomized, prospective trial in a university-affiliated 12-bed pediatric intensive care unit. Patients were critically ill children requiring placement of an NJ feeding tube. Patient age, weight, medications, use of mechanical ventilation, and patient tolerance were recorded. An abdominal radiograph obtained immediately after the placement determined correct placement. The final placement was recorded, as was the number of placement attempts. METHODS: Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: standard technique, standard technique facilitated with gastric insufflation, and standard technique facilitated with the use of preinsertion erythromycin. To ensure equal distribution, all patients were stratified by weight (<10 kg vs > or =10 kg) before randomization. All NJ tubes were placed by one of the investigators. If unsuccessful, a second attempt by the same investigator was allowed. Successful placement of the NJ tube was defined by confirmation of the tip of the tube in the first part of the duodenum or beyond by a pediatric radiologist blinded to the treatment groups. RESULTS: Seventy-five pediatric patients were enrolled in the study; 94.6% (71/75) of tubes were passed successfully into the small bowel on the first or second attempt. Evaluation of the data revealed no significant association with a specific technique and successful placement (p = .1999). CONCLUSIONS: When placed by a core group of experienced operators, the majority of NJ feeding tubes can be placed in critically ill or injured children on the first or second attempt, regardless of the technique used.     

Verification of an electromagnetic placement device compared with abdominal radiograph to predict accuracy of feeding tube placement

Background: Use of an electromagnetic placement device (EMPD) facilitates placement of feeding tubes at the bedside. Standard practice for verification of feeding tube placement is via radiographic confirmation. The purpose of this research study was to assess the accuracy of placement of small‐bore feeding tubes (SBFTs) as determined by EMPD interpretation compared with that of abdominal radiograph verification by a radiologist. Methods: This multicenter prospective study enrolled patients requiring bedside feeding tube placement. SBFTs were placed by an experienced investigator using the EMPD. Two abdominal radiographs were then obtained: one after initial SBFT placement and an additional radiograph after injection of contrast. Documentation of location based on clinician interpretation using the EMPD was then compared with radiologist interpretation. Results: The final sample size was 194 patients, including 18 pediatric patients. Patient age ranged from 12 days to 102 years. Median time for tube placement was 12 minutes. Of the 194 patients, only 1 patient had data showing discrepancies between the original EMPD verification and the final abdominal radiograph interpretation, providing a 99.5% agreement. No patient experienced complications during SBFT placement, and 15 patients had inadvertent airway placement that was avoided with the use of the EMPD. Conclusions: There was a high percentage of agreement between EMPD and radiologic interpretation after contrast injection. The EMPD aided in avoiding inadvertent airway placement, with no patient complications. This device can be used safely at the bedside to facilitate placement of feeding tubes, leading to the delivery of early enteral nutrition.     

Economic Implications of an Early Postoperative Enteral Feeding Protocol

OBJECTIVE: To study the cost-effectiveness of an early postoperative feeding protocol for patients undergoing bowel resections. DESIGN: A nonrandomized, prospective, clinical trial. Surgeons elected to participate in the treatment arm before the study's outset. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Treatment (n = 66) and control (n = 159) patients were admitted to a nonprofit general teaching hospital in the Texas Medical Center for similar diagnoses and subsequent bowel resections during an 18-month period. INTERVENTION: Treatment patients who met specific inclusion criteria had a jejunal feeding tube placed during surgery. Tube feedings were initiated within 12 hours after surgery. Control patients who met the same inclusion criteria received usual care. OUTCOMES: A successful outcome was defined as a patient developing no postoperative infection. The average cost of a nosocomial infection is presented. Variable direct and total costs (fixed plus variable) are compared between patient groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean cost was adjusted for rate of success in each patient group according to an analytic model. The mean cost difference between groups was analyzed by independent-samples t tests. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum tests were used to determine the cost significance of a nosocomial infection. RESULTS: The average variable direct cost savings per successful treatment patient was $1,531, which required an additional variable cost of $108.30 for the dietitian's time. The protocol resulted in a total cost savings of $4,450 per success in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: An early postoperative enteral feeding protocol as part of an outcomes management program for patients undergoing bowel resection is cost-effective.     

Placement of Nasoenteral Feeding Tubes Using Magnetic Guidance: Retesting a New Technique

Objective: To study a new technique of intubating the small bowel using a newly developed nasoenteral feeding tube fitted with a magnet in its tip and guided for placement with an external magnet.

Methods: The study was performed in medical and surgical wards of a university-affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs hospital on 42 patients referred by their attending physicians for tube placement. The newly designed feeding tube was inserted per nares into the stomach using traditional technique. As the tube was advanced, movement of the hand-held steering magnet was designed to guide the tip of the magnetic nasoenteral tube along the lesser curvature of the stomach, through the pyloric sphincter, and into the duodenum. Portable abdominal radiography confirmed the anatomic location of the tube tip.

Results: Fifty-one intubations were performed on 42 subjects. In 45 intubations (88%), tubes passed into the duodenum. Twenty-seven (53%) met criteria for optimal placement in the second portion of the duodenum or distally. Six of 11 tubes (55%) that were not optimally placed were advanced to the distal duodenum on repositioning. Median procedure time for the initial intubations was 30 minutes (interquartile range 15–40). Median procedure time for last 10 intubations improved to 13 minutes (interquartile range 5–20). No complications were related to the procedure.

Conclusions: Enteral feeding tube placement using external magnetic guidance is a promising, novel technique which is deserving of further study.     

Use of a nasal bridle prevents accidental nasoenteral feeding tube removal

Reinserting feeding tubes that are accidentally removed exposes patients to risk and consumes hospital resources. We were interested to know if using a bridle to secure tubes would be more effective than tape at preventing accidental tube removal. This was a quality improvement project with a before-and-after design. Between May 2007 and August 2007, we prospectively followed 90 tubes (50 tape, 40 bridle). Tubes were followed up daily until accidental tube removal, ICU discharge, or planned tube removal. Our primary endpoint was accidental tube removal. We compared the 2 groups on the following: (1) proportion of tubes accidentally removed; (2) rate of accidental tube removal (per 100 tube-days); and (3) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Survival analysis data were right-censored at ICU discharge or planned tube removal. There were no significant differences between groups in any demographics. The proportion of tubes accidentally removed was 36% (18 of 50) in the tape group and 10% (4 of 40) in the bridle group; P<.05. The rate of accidental tube removal (per 100 tube-days) was 6.4 (18 in 281 tube-days) in the tape group and 1.6 (4 in 248 tube-days) in the bridle group; P<.05. Survival analysis showed a significant difference between the groups with a log-rank test for equality of survivor function of P<.05. Using a bridle to secure feeding tubes significantly reduces the proportion and rate of accidental tube removal and results in increased tube survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis.     

Experience with image-guided gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tubes in children and adolescents with primary psychiatric illness

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical experience with G/GJ tubes in child and adolescent psychiatry patients with disordered eating. METHOD: Health Records and Image-Guided Therapy databases (1995-2005) identified patients with primary psychiatric illness who received radiologically placed G/GJ tubes for refeeding. Patient charts were reviewed for relevant data. RESULTS: Nine patients who were 11-17 years old had G/GJ tubes inserted for refeeding as a result of their psychopathology. Prior to G/GJ tube insertion, adolescent inpatients were fed by NG/NJ tube for 0.5-7.3 months (mean 3.1 months) and subsequently fed by G/GJ tube for 5-60 months (mean 29 months) on an outpatient basis. No major complications or episodes of intentional tube manipulation/removal occurred. G/GJ tube feeding was effective in restoring and/or maintaining weight. CONCLUSION: Image-guided enterostomy tubes are a safe and well-tolerated method for feeding pediatric patients with psychiatric disorders and food refusal, and allow outpatient management of underlying psychopathology.     

胃镜辅助下放置空肠营养管的方法

目的:探讨内镜下放置空肠营养管的方法.方法:给148例病人放置空肠营养管,116例病人在胃镜下用异物钳钳夹胃腔内空肠营养管,推送胃镜将其送至Treitz韧带以下.32例经鼻超细胃镜放置导丝后,再经导丝放入空肠营养管.结果:两种空肠营养管放置成功率均为100%,其中鼻肠管126例,三腔鼻肠管22例.两组均无严重并发症,1例病人置管后出现血淀粉酶升高.结论:两种空肠营养管放置的方法成功率均高,不良反应小,操作简单安全.     

Bedside electromagnetic-guided feeding tube placement: an improvement over traditional placement technique?

BACKGROUND: Registered dietitian/registered nurse (RD/RN) teams were created to place small bowel feeding tubes (SBFT) at the bedside in intensive care unit (ICU) patients using an electromagnetic tube placement device (ETPD). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of placing feeding tubes at the ICU bedside using an ETPD. Secondary outcomes included success rate, cost, and timeliness of feeding initiation. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 20 SBFT blind placements in ICU patients (control group). After implementing a protocol for RD/RN teams to place SBFTs with an ETPD, 81 SBFTs were placed (study group). Complications, success rate, number of x-rays after tube placement, x-ray cost, and time from physician order to initiation of feedings were compared between the groups. RESULTS: No adverse events occurred in either group. Successful SBFT placement was 63% (12/19) in the control group and 78% (63/81) in the study group (not significant, NS). The median time between physician order for tube placement and feeding initiation decreased from 22.3 hours (control group) to 7.8 hours (study group, p = .003). The median number of x-rays to confirm correct placement was 1 in the study group compared with 2 in the control group (p = .0001), resulting in a 50% decrease in the mean cost for x-rays. CONCLUSIONS: No adverse events occurred with the implementation of bedside feeding tube placement using an ETPD. In addition, SBFT placement with an ETPD by designated ICU RD/RN teams resulted in lower x-ray costs and more timely initiation of enteral feedings compared with blind placement.     

Lower respiratory tract illness in the first two years of life: epidemiologic patterns and costs in a suburban pediatric practice.

The epidemiologic patterns and the economic impact of acute lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) in children under age two were studied using data collected from November 1, 1971-August 30, 1975 in a suburban pediatric practice in Monroe County, New York. LRTI was responsible for 23 illness episodes per 100 child-years among children in their first two years of life. This indicates that a cohort of 100 children might be anticipated to have 46 LRTI episodes from birth until their second birthday. The majority of episodes correlated with the presence of four viruses in the community, most commonly respiratory syncytial virus. The minimal, estimated direct cost of LRTI in the first two years of life based on 1984 cost data was equivalent to $35.14 for every child and was comprised of hospitalization cost ($19.68) and ambulatory care cost ($15.46). Hospitalization costs attributable to LRTI comprised at least 2.5 per cent of all hospitalization costs in this age group. Immunization against the four most common respiratory viruses, at a reasonable cost per child immunized, would appear to be cost beneficial.     

A new nasal bridle for securing nasoenteral feeding tubes

A newly designed nasal bridle and rationale for its clinical use are described. Previous nasal bridles have been shown to reduce the 40 to 60% incidence of dislodgement of nasoenteral feeding tubes. Nasal bridles, however, are still not routinely used in nasoenteral feeding of patients who dislodge their feeding tubes. Instead, percutaneous gastrostomies and parenteral nutrition are increasingly being used in these patients who may otherwise be fed adequately with a secured nasoenteral tube. The newly designed nasal bridle described herein has the advantages of easy and rapid placement. Use of this bridle can promote safer and more effective enteral feeding while avoiding the complications and cost of parenteral nutritional and gastrostomies.     

Placement of a Magnetic Small Bowel Feeding Tube at the Bedside

Background: Current methods of achieving postpyloric enteral access for feeding are fraught with difficulties, which can markedly delay enteral feeding and cause complications. Bedside tube placement has a low success rate, often requires several radiographs to confirm position, and delays feeding by many hours. Although postpyloric enteral tubes can reliably be placed in interventional radiology (IR), this involves greater resource utilization, delays, cost, and inconvenience. We assessed the utility of bedside enteral tube placement using a magnetic feeding tube (Syncro‐BlueTube; Syncro Medical Innovations, Macon, GA, USA) as a means to facilitate initial tube placement. Methods: We recorded the time to insertion, location of tube, success rate, and need for radiographs in a series of patients given magnetic feeding tubes (n = 46) inserted by our hospitalist service over an 8‐month interval. Results: Of the 46 attempted magnetic tube placements, 76% were successfully placed in the postpyloric position, 13% were in the stomach, and 11% could not be placed. In 83% of the magnetic tubes, only 1 radiograph was needed for confirmation. The median time to placement was 12 minutes (range, 4–120 minutes). Conclusion: The use of a magnetic feeding tube can increase the success rate of bedside postpyloric placement, decrease the time to successful placement, and decrease the need for supplemental radiographs and IR.     

Spontaneous transpyloric passage and performance of 'fine bore' polyurethane feeding tubes: a controlled clinical trial

Certain groups of patients requiring enteral nutritional support are at increased risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration of feed. Positioning of enteral feeding tubes distal to the pylorus has been advocated as a method of reducing such complications. Various techniques have been suggested to achieve postpyloric siting. Reports have indicated that lengthening the tube or altering the distal end tip configuration, by varying the tip profile or by the addition of a weight, may facilitate spontaneous transpyloric passage of the tube. This prospective controlled clinical study using three new polyurethane tubes demonstrates that the frequency of spontaneous transpyloric passage of the tube is not affected by tip profile or by the addition of a weight. Indeed, with all three tube designs only about one-third had passed spontaneously through the pylorus at 24 hr. Once through the pylorus the unweighted tube stayed in position significantly longer than the weighted tubes (p less than 0.005). We suggest that in those patients requiring post-pyloric feeding, endoscopic or fluoroscopic techniques should be used to position the tubes at the time of insertion, and that an unweighted tube should be used to prolong tube usage.     

一次性医疗用品与复用医疗用品成本效益研究

目的研究一次性医疗用品(一次性导尿包、一次性换药包、一次性呼吸机管道、一次性塑料鞋套)与复用医疗用品(导尿包、换药包、呼吸机管道、复用拖鞋)成本效益,探讨一次性医疗用品与复用医疗用品经济效益与社会效益的利与弊。方法采取作业成本法和定性分析法将供应室的生产活动看成是由一系列的作业所组成的,完成一项作业消耗一定的资源,并根据产品生产的特点和成本管理的不同要求,对产品成本结构进行系统归纳,核算出实际成本。计算复用医疗用品替代一次性医疗用品减少的医疗废物产生量。结果复用导尿包成本12.15元/套,一次性导尿包成本16.00元/套,节省成本3.85元/套;复用换药包成本6.07元/套,一次性换药包成本5.50元/套,增加成本0.57元/套;复用呼吸机管道成本68.47元/套,一次性呼吸机管道成本80.00元,节省成本11.53元/套;复用拖鞋成本0.03元/双·次,一次性塑料鞋套成本0.17元/双,节省成本0.14元/双·次。假设以上医疗用品复用替代一次性使用,以某院为例,2014年节约费用187 409.50元,减少的医疗废物量30 839.6 kg;2015年节约费用133 243.64元,减少的医疗废物量43 517.5 kg。结论复用医疗用品的成本低于一次性医疗用品的成本,推广使用复用医疗用品可以降低医疗成本,减少患者医疗费用,减少医疗废物产生,同时可节约国家有限的资源。     

Breastfeeding promotion and priority setting in health

An increase in exclusive breastfeeding prevalence can substantially reduce mortality and morbidity among infants. In this paper, estimates of the costs and impacts of three breastfeeding promotion programmes, implemented through maternity services in Brazil, Honduras and Mexico, are used to develop cost-effectiveness measures and these are compared with other health interventions. The results show that breastfeeding promotion can be one of the most cost-effective health interventions for preventing cases of diarrhoea, preventing deaths from diarrhoea, and gaining disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The benefits are substantial over a broad range of programme types. Programmes starting with the removal of formula and medications during delivery are likely to derive a high level of impact per unit of net incremental cost. Cost-effectiveness is lower (but still attractive relative to other interventions) if hospitals already have rooming-in and no bottle-feeds; and the cost-effectiveness improves as programmes become well-established. At an annual cost of about 30 to 40 US cents per birth, programmes starting with formula feeding in nurseries and maternity wards can reduce diarrhoea cases for approximately $0.65 to $1.10 per case prevented, diarrhoea deaths for $100 to $200 per death averted, and reduce the burden of disease for approximately $2 to $4 per DALY. Maternity services that have already eliminated formula can, by investing from $2 to $3 per birth, prevent diarrhoea cases and deaths for $3.50 to $6.75 per case, and $550 to $800 per death respectively, with DALYs gained at $12 to $19 each.