Pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy after switch to once-daily lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children

Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) is a protease inhibitor that is used twice daily (BID) in the treatment of HIV infection in children. In the context of a single-center observational study, a switch to a once-a-day (QD) LPV/r regimen was proposed for considerations of convenience and to support adherence. The aims of this study were to compare the pharmacokinetics, viral loads, percentages of CD4(+) T cells, and lipid profiles after switching from a twice-daily to a once-daily regimen of LPV/r in experienced children. For this purpose, LPV concentrations, viral loads, CD4(+) T cells, and biochemistry data were measured in routine therapeutic drug monitoring procedures in 45 children and adolescents. Thirty-six children were switched to the QD regimen. Nine children on the BID or QD regimen were added for pharmacokinetic-study purposes only. The QD trough concentrations (C(trough)) of lopinavir in plasma were significantly lower than those observed with the BID regimen (P < 0.0001), but the 24-h exposure levels were not significantly lower with the QD than with the BID regimen (P = 0.09). Among 34 evaluable patients who switched from the BID to the QD regimen, the virological efficacy of LPV/r appeared to differ (P < 0.001), with 74% and 57% of viral loads, respectively, being <50 copies/ml (mean follow-up times, 33 and 20 months). Among 22 patients with stable virological control before the switch, 12 experienced either failure or blip (one observation of detectable viral load between two observations of undetectable viral load) after the switch. The change from the BID to the QD regimen did not result in significant differences in CD4(+) T cell percentages or total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels. The switch from the BID to the QD LPV/r regimen led to equivalent exposure and lower C(trough) values and resulted in lower levels of virological control in these antiretroviral-experienced children.     

The MOTIVATE trials: maraviroc therapy in antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients

Although the use of combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in spectacular improvements in morbidity and mortality of HIV-1 infected patients, a need for the development of antiretroviral compounds with new mechanisms of action remains. Maraviroc (Celsentri^®; ViiV Healthcare, Middlesex, UK) is the only drug of the class of chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 antagonists registered for treatment for HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients. Registration was based on the MOTIVATE-1 and -2 studies, which compared the efficacy and tolerability of maraviroc in combination with optimized background therapy with placebo. The aim of this paper is to review the MOTIVATE studies and to discuss issues related to maraviroc therapy in clinical practice such as assessment of HIV-1 coreceptor tropism.     

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of etravirine administered as two different formulations in HIV-1-infected patients

BACKGROUND: An open-label, randomized, crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of two different formulations of etravirine after single and multiple dosing. METHODS:Treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients with viral load <50 copies/ml continued their current antiretroviral regimen and added etravirine twice daily for 7 days with a morning intake on day 8. Etravirine was administered following food as either 800 mg twice daily of the Phase II formulation or 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily of the Phase III formulation. A 12 h pharmacokinetic assessment was performed on days 1 and 8. RESULTS: After single- and multiple-dose administration, the exposure to etravirine was lower with 100 mg twice daily and higher with 200 mg twice daily compared with 800 mg twice daily. On day 8, the mean (+/-SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 12 h (AUC0-12 h) was 1,284 (+/-958) ng x h/ml when etravirine was administered as 100 mg twice daily (n=33), 3,713 (+/-2,069) ng x h/ml when administered as 200 mg twice daily (n=27) and 2,607 (+/-2,135) ng x h/ml when administered as 800 mg twice daily (n=32). Both formulations and all doses of etravirine tested were generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The range of exposure to etravirine was comparable between 200 mg twice daily dose and 800 mg twice daily. The Phase III formulation of etravirine significantly improves the bioavailability of etravirine over the Phase II formulation with reduced interpatient variability in etravirine pharmacokinetics.     

Health-related quality of life and tolerability in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients on tipranavir versus comparator regimens

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy including tipranavir boosted with ritonavir (TPV/r) has shown superior viral suppression and immunological response compared with comparator ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (CPI/r) regimens in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. This study assesses the influence of adverse events (AEs) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and change in HRQOL in patients treated with TPV/r versus CPI/r regimens. METHODS: Changes in HRQOL over 48 weeks were assessed using Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) data combined from two randomized, open-label, Phase III studies (RESIST-1 and RESIST-2). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to compare physical health and mental health summary scores and 10 subscale scores, and to compare scores of patients with and without AEs. To compare AE incidences in the two treatment groups, AEs were exposure-adjusted. RESULTS: There were 984 patients in the HRQOL analysis. AE occurrence and severity resulted in significantly lower MOS-HIV scores across both treatment arms (P<0.05). Overall incidence of AEs was higher in the CPI/r versus TPV/r group (562.8 versus 514.4 per 100 patient-exposure years); treatment-related AEs were more frequent in the TPV/r group (75.0 versus 56.6 per 100 patient-exposure years). HRQOL was maintained in patients on TPV/r over 48 weeks of treatment across all summary and subscale scores. Compared with CPI/r, TPV/r was associated with a significant but small (SD<0.2) improvement in pain scores (+4.8 points; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL was maintained across both summary and all subscale scores from baseline to 48 weeks in the TPV/r and CPI/r treatment arms, despite the incidence of treatment-related AEs.     

HIV-1 tropism evolution after short-term maraviroc monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients

We analyzed the evolution of viral tropism after 8 days of maraviroc monotherapy, i.e., we used the maraviroc clinical test (MCT), in 21 patients with and 14 without virological response to the drug (MCT(+) and MCT(-) patients, respectively). No increases in CXCR4 inferred viral loads (X4IVLs) were observed in MCT(+) patients, while X4IVLs increased only in MCT(-) patients, with X4IVLs of >2 log(10) HIV RNA copies/ml. These results shed light on the evolution of viral tropism under a CCR5 antagonist in vivo.     

Pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitor indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children as part of a prospective, open, uncontrolled, multicenter study in The Netherlands. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children were monitored over 6 months of treatment with zidovudine (120 mg/m(2) every 8 h [q8h]), lamivudine (4 mg/kg of body weight q12h), and indinavir (33mg/kg of metabolic weight [MW] q8h). Four weeks after the start of treatment, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. If patients had an indinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of below 10 or above 30 mg/liter. h, a dose increase or a dose reduction was made and pharmacokinetic measurements were repeated 4 weeks later. Nineteen patients started with the dose of 33 mg/kg of MW q8h. The median AUC (range) was 10.5 (2.8 to 51.0) mg/liter. h. The median AUC (range) in 17 children treated with 50 mg/kg of MW q8h was 20.6 (4.1 to 38.7) mg/liter. h. Finally, five patients had a dose increase to 67 mg/kg of MW q8h, resulting in a median AUC (range) of 36.6 (27.2 to 80.0) mg/liter. h. After 6 months of treatment, there were 11 children with an AUC of below 20 mg/liter. h, of whom 5 (45%) had a detectable viral load, while this was the case in none of the 11 children with an AUC of higher than 20 mg/liter. h. We conclude that the optimal dose of indinavir in children to obtain drug exposure similar to that observed in adult patients is 50 mg/kg of MW q8h, which approximates 600 mg/m(2) q8h. It would even be better to adjust the indinavir dose based on an AUC of greater than 20 mg/liter. h.     

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of enfuvirtide in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize population pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide, 90 mg twice daily injected subcutaneously, in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, as well as the relationship between exposure and antiviral effect. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of enfuvirtide and HIV-1 ribonucleic acid were obtained from 628 patients in 2 phase III studies. NONMEM software was used for population pharmacokinetic analysis and to assess the effects of age, gender, body weight, anti-gp41 antibodies, and concomitant drugs. Enfuvirtide exposure (area under the plasma concentration-12-hour time curve or steady-state trough concentration) was calculated from individual parameter estimates derived from the model. The decline in HIV-1 ribonucleic acid from baseline at week 2 or 24 was regressed against estimates of enfuvirtide exposure by a maximum effect model. The exposure-response relationship was examined in functional monotherapy (phenotypic sensitivity score of 0) and combination therapy (phenotypic sensitivity score > or = 1). RESULTS: Enfuvirtide population pharmacokinetics was well described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Body weight and female gender were identified as affecting apparent clearance but not efficacy and safety. Concomitant medications had no significant effect on enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics. Antiviral response to enfuvirtide was independent of drug exposure, suggesting that the approved 90-mg twice-daily dose was in the plateau portion of the dose-response curve. For functional monotherapy (phenotypic sensitivity score of 0), approximately 66% of estimated maximal effect was achieved at week 2 and 73% at week 24, and for combination therapy, more than 92% was achieved at both weeks 2 and 24. CONCLUSIONS: Body weight and gender affected enfuvirtide clearance, but changes in exposure did not affect efficacy or safety. Efficacy reached a plateau at the 90-mg twice-daily dosage in the exposure-response curve.     

Pharmacokinetics of a once-daily regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected children

INTRODUCTION: Lopinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor that is co-formulated with ritonavir. The approved paediatric dose is 230/57.5 mg/m2 twice daily. Once-daily dosing may offer an advantage to adherence. We studied the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in a once-daily regimen in HIV-1-infected children. METHODS: HIV-1-infected children on stable antiretroviral therapy with a viral load <50 copies/ml for at least 6 months received lopinavir/ritonavir 460/115mg/m2 once daily with zidovudine and lamivudine. Blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 24 h after observed intake during steady state. Target level for lopinavir Cmin was 1.0 mg/l, based on in vitro IC50 data. RESULTS: Nineteen HIV-1-infected children with a median (range) age of 4.5 (1.4-12.9) years were enrolled. The median (interquartile range) dose of lopinavir was 456 (444-477) mg/m2. The mean (standard deviation) AUC0-24, Cmax and Cmin of lopinavir were 149.8 +/- 58.8 h*mg/l, 10.77 +/- 2.90 mg/l and 2.88 +/- 3.74 mg/l respectively. These values are comparable to data observed in adults using lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg once daily. In 10/19 (53%) children Cmin was considered to be too low (<1.0 mg/l). Younger children more often experienced subtherapeutic trough levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that 460/115 mg/m2 lopinavir/ritonavir once daily leads to mean pharmacokinetic parameters comparable to data of 800/200 mg lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in adults, although the variability observed in the trough levels is much higher in children. Further research, especially in young children, is necessary to determine whether a higher dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily must be given to reach the target level for Cmin.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the vasopeptidase inhibitor AVE7688 in humans

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to define the pharmacodynamic profile of the new dual neutral endopeptidase (NEP)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor AVE7688. METHODS: We compared the effects of single oral doses of AVE7688 (5 and 25 mg) with those of 10 mg ramipril (R10), a selective ACE inhibitor, in a placebo-controlled crossover study in sodium-depleted normotensive subjects. We also compared the effects of 25 mg AVE7688 with those of a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade induced by a high dose of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (300 mg irbesartan) and a dual blockade of the RAS (150 mg irbesartan plus 10 mg ramipril) in sodium-replete normotensive subjects by use of the same study design. The in vivo inhibition of ACE and NEP was monitored by measuring the urinary excretion of N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), respectively. The intensity of RAS blockade was assessed by the increase in plasma active renin concentration. RESULTS: The 24-hour urine AcSDKP cumulative excretion increased significantly more after 25 mg AVE7688 (919 nmol [95% confidence interval (CI), 803-1052 nmol], P < .05) than after 5 mg AVE7688 (706 nmol [95% CI, 612-813 nmol]) or 10 mg ramipril (511 nmol [95% CI, 440-593 nmol]). The 25-mg dose of AVE7866 significantly and transiently (4 to 8 hours after drug intake) increased urinary ANP (2.02 +/- 1.05 ng/h, P < .05), whereas 5 mg AVE7688 (1.14 +/- 0.77 ng/h) and 10 mg ramipril (0.93 +/- 0.65 ng/h) had no effect compared with placebo (0.80 +/- 0.37 ng/h). In the low-salt panel the rise in plasma active renin concentration achieved 24 hours after dosing by 25 mg AVE7688 (247 pg/mL [95% CI, 157-389 pg/mL], P < .05) was significantly higher than that achieved by 5 mg AVE7688 (129 pg/mL [95% CI, 75-221 pg/mL]) or 10 mg ramipril (113 pg/mL [95% CI, 67-193 pg/mL]), which did not differ. In the high-salt panel group the effects of 25 mg AVE7688 on renin release did not significantly differ from those after administration of the combination of 150 mg irbesartan plus 10 mg ramipril or 300 mg irbesartan alone. All of these active drugs similarly decreased blood pressure compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: AVE7688 at a dose of 25 mg has a favorable pharmacodynamic profile compared with other RAS blockers. These results support further clinical studies of its long-term effects in essential or resistant hypertension, chronic proteinuric nephropathy, and chronic heart failure.     

Pharmacokinetics of reduced-dose indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily in HIV-1-infected Thai patients

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics of indinavir/ ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily in antiretroviral-naive patients at Srinagarind Hospital in Khon Kaen, Thailand. METHODS: This was a steady-state, open-label pharmacokinetic study of 19 patients. A 12 h pharmacokinetic curve was recorded after an overnight fast. Plasma levels of indinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Virological failure was defined according to the most recent US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines as a viral load above 400 copies/ml at week 24. RESULTS: Median baseline values for CD4 and viral load were 13cells/mm3 and 167000 copies/ml, respectively. The median (interquartile ranges) for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 18.1 (15.3-23.8) mg/l x h, 4.1 (3.6-4.8) mg/l and 0.17 (0.12-0.30) mg/l, respectively. These values represent 37%, 39% and 24% of the AUC, Cmax and Cmin values found, respectively, for the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg dose in HIV-1-infected Thai patients. Short-term virological response was satisfactory. There were three subjects with an indinavir Cmin. below the target value of 0.10 mg/l, of whom one had virological failure (33%). Among the other 16 subjects with an indinavir Cmin above 0.10 mg/l, there was also one virological failure (6%) (P=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir exposure in this reduced-dose regimen of 400 mg with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily was more than dose-proportionally lower than previously observed with the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily regimen. Therapeutic Cmin levels of indinavir were achieved in >80% of the subjects and short-term virological response was satisfactory in this cohort of patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy at an advanced disease stage with high baseline viral loads.     

Stavudine, didanosine and nevirapine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients

In an ongoing, open-label, non-comparative study, the safety and efficacy of nevirapine/stavudine/didanosine were evaluated in 100 antiretroviral-naive adults with CD4 cell counts > or = 200 cells/mm3 and plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL) > or = 5000 copies/ml. Sixty patients received nevirapine twice daily (VIRGO I) and 40 received nevirapine once daily (VIRGO II); all patients received didanosine once a day. After median follow-ups of 44 weeks in VIRGO I and 30 weeks in VIRGO II, the following virological results were observed (ongoing study): an intent-to-treat, non-completer equals failure analysis at week 24 showed the proportions of patients with pVL <500 copies/ml were 78% in VIRGO I (60% <50 copies/ml) and 75% in VIRGO II. An on-treatment analysis at week 52 showed 80% of patients with a pVL <500 copies/ml and 59% with <50 copies/ml in VIRGO I. The mean CD4 cell count increase was +171 cells/mm3 at week 24 and +218 cells/mm3 at week 52 in VIRGO I and +158 cells/mm3 at week 24 in VIRGO II. Cutaneous rash (grades 1 to 3) occurred in 24% of patients leading to nevirapine discontinuation in eight of 24 patients. Five other patients discontinued therapy during the first 24 weeks because of hepatic cytolysis, peripheral neuropathy or biological pancreatitis. The nevirapine/stavudine/didanosine combination is a convenient and safe regimen, with rapid and potent immunological and antiviral effects sustained over 12 months.     

Interaction between artemether-lumefantrine and nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients

Artemether-lumefantrine and nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) are the most commonly recommended first-line treatments for malaria and HIV, respectively, in Africa. Artemether, lumefantrine, and nevirapine are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme system, which nevirapine induces, creating potential for important drug interactions. In a parallel-design pharmacokinetic study, concentration-time profiles were obtained in two groups of HIV-infected patients: ART-naïve patients and those stable on nevirapine-based therapy. Both groups received the recommended artemether-lumefantrine dose. Patients were admitted for intense pharmacokinetic sampling (0 to 72 h) with outpatient sampling until 21 days. Concentrations of lumefantrine, artemether, dihydroartemisinin, and nevirapine were determined by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. The primary outcome was observed day 7 lumefantrine concentrations, as these are associated with therapeutic response in malaria. We enrolled 36 patients (32 females). Median (range) day 7 lumefantrine concentrations were 622 ng/ml (185 to 2,040 ng/ml) and 336 ng/ml (29 to 934 ng/ml) in the nevirapine and ART-naïve groups, respectively (P = 0.0002). The median artemether area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h [AUC_{(0-8 h)}] (P < 0.0001) and dihydroartemisinin AUC_{(60-68 h)} (P = 0.01) were lower in the nevirapine group. Combined artemether and dihydroartemisinin exposure decreased over time only in the nevirapine group (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 0.76 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.65 to 0.90]; P < 0.0001) and increased with the weight-adjusted artemether dose (GMR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.31 to 3.45]; P = 0.002). Adverse events were similar between groups, with no difference in electrocardiographic Fridericia corrected QT and P-R intervals at the expected time of maximum lumefantrine concentration (T_max). Nevirapine-based ART decreased artemether and dihydroartemisinin AUCs but unexpectedly increased lumefantrine exposure. The mechanism of the lumefantrine interaction remains to be elucidated. Studies investigating the interaction of nevirapine and artemether-lumefantrine in HIV-infected patients with malaria are urgently needed.     

Evolution of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in HIV-1-infected patients in Italy from 2000 to 2010

Prevalence and predictors of transmitted drug resistance (TDR), defined as the presence of at least one WHO surveillance drug resistance mutation (SDRM), were investigated in antiretroviral-na?ve HIV-1-infected patients, with a genotypic resistance test (GRT) performed ≤6 months before starting cART between 2000 and 2010. 3163 HIV-1 sequences were selected (69% subtype B). Overall, the prevalence of TDR was 12% (13.2% subtype B, 9% non-B). TDR significantly declined overall and for the single drug classes. Older age independently predicted increased odds of TDR, whereas a more recent GRT, a higher HIV-RNA and C vs. B subtype predicted lower odds of TDR.