Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity profile of dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin (EPI) and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer (ABC). From January to September 1997, 41 patients with recurrent or metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Their median age was 57 (range, 33-77) years and median performance status 0 (range, 0-2). Twenty patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of 4 cycles of EPI 110 mg/m2 every 2 weeks followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel, 225 mg/m2 over 3 hours every 2 weeks. G-CSF was administered prophylactically on days 2-10 of each cycle. 34 (83.0%) patients completed all 8 cycles of chemotherapy. A total of 304 cycles were administered, 259 (85.0%) of them at full dose. Thirty (10.0%) cycles were delivered with a delay. The relative median dose intensities of EPI and paclitaxel were 0.95. Most common grade 3-4 side effects were anemia (15.0%) neutropenia (12.0%), thrombocytopenia (5.0%), nausea/vomiting (10.0%), febrile neutropenia (7.5%), and alopecia (90.0%). Overall, 8 (19.5%) patients achieved a complete and 15 (36.5%) a partial response. Median duration of response was 8.4 (range, 3.1-15.5+) months. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, median time to progression was 8.7 (range, 0.5-21+) months; median survival has not been reached yet. Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with EPI and paclitaxel shows promising activity as first-line treatment in ABC. Randomized studies comparing this type of chemotherapy with the classical administration of the two drugs together every 3 weeks are ongoing.     

A multicentre phase II pilot study of epirubicin and Taxol (paclitaxel) in patients with advanced breast cancer

Anthracyclines are the gold standard monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Higher response rates are seen with drug combinations, especially with newer agents such as taxanes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and activity of the combination of paclitaxel and epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer. Thirty-five women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (first and second relapse) were treated with epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 3-weekly. Six centres recruited 35 patients; 34 (97%) were assessable for response. Eighteen had undergone prior chemotherapy, including six (17%) with anthracycline-containing regimens. Grade 4 neutropenia was found in 33 patients (94%), which was of 4 days' average duration; however, infective complications were rare, with only nine cycles (6%) complicated by neutropenic sepsis. There were two sepsis-related deaths. Symptomatic cardiotoxicity was infrequent, although a >15% decline in cardiac function was recorded in five patients (14%). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three patients (9%). The overall response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval 33-67) (complete response 12%; partial response 38%), with a median duration of response of 31 weeks. The median time to progression was 27 weeks, with a median survival of 48 weeks. This regimen appears to be a relatively safe, tolerable and effective treatment for advanced breast cancer. A United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee for Cancer Research Phase III trial (AB-01) comparing this combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel completed accrual in November 1999.     

紫杉醇联合表阿霉素剂量密集辅助化疗的安全性观察

目的 观察紫杉醇(PTX)联合表阿霉素(EPI)剂鼍密集化疗在高复发风险的乳腺癌辅助化疗中的安全性和耐受性.方法 2004年1月至2006年12月共收治101例乳腺癌术后患者,均具有高复发风险.采用FIX联合EPI的方案进行辅助化疗,随机分为密集组和常规组,计划每例患者接受6个周期的化疗.结果 全组有98例患者按计划完成化疗,中位随访24个月,中位无复发生存和总牛存时间均未达到.密集组和常规组的无复发率分别为89.8%和87.8%,2年生存率分别为100%和93.9%,其中高危患者的无复发率分别为86.8%和81.3%,2年生存率分别为100%和90.6%.全组101例患者均可评价不良反应,主要不良反应为粒细胞减少、恶心、呕吐和脱发.密集组和常规组的Ⅲ～Ⅳ度粒细胞减少发生率分别为16.0%和54.9%(P=0.000),凶不良反应而延迟化疗的发生率分别为2.4%和6.0%(P=0.027),两组间其他不良反应差异无统计学意义.结论 PTX联合EPI剂量密集方案用于高复发风险乳腺癌患者的辅助化疗,不良反应可以耐受,是一个安全的、有潜力的方案.     

Weekly docetaxel/paclitaxel in pretreated metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of weekly docetaxel/paclitaxel in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. Twenty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were included in this study. Three different schedules of treatment were administered. The starting schedule, A1, consisted of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 over 1 hour, weekly for 18 weeks; this schedule was considered feasible if at least 70% of the planned doses were given on time and without reduction. Schedule A2 consisted of the same doses administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and schedule B consisted of docetaxel 25 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 for 1 hour on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a total of 6 cycles. All patients had received prior anthracyclines, and 19 patients were pretreated with taxanes. Seventy-seven percent of patients had received at least 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients are assessable for toxicity and efficacy. A total of 109 cycles of chemotherapy have been administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-8 cycles). The median delivered dose intensity was 27 mg/m2/week for paclitaxel (range, 18-50 mg/m2/week) and 17 mg/m2/week (range, 12-39 mg/m2/week) for docetaxel. Six patients received schedule A1. This schedule was considered not feasible due to neutropenia grade > 2, mucositis, and diarrhea grade 2, which required dose reduction/omission in 33% of administrations. For this reason, treatment in the following 5 patients was omitted on day 15 (schedule A2). Schedule B was found to be more feasible with 16% of dose reductions/omissions. The overall response rate was 68% (95% CI, 50%-86%) with a median duration of response of 10 months (range, 2-18+ months). Treatment was well tolerated; myelosuppression was rare and grade 3 cutaneous toxicity was observed in only 2 patients. In conclusion, weekly docetaxel/paclitaxel is active at low dosages and was well tolerated as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. This regimen represents a valid option as a salvage treatment in taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated patients.     

High-dose chemotherapy with mitoxantrone + melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue in metastatic breast cancer patients: a study of feasibility and tolerability

Hematological and extra-hematological toxicity of mitoxantrone-containing regimens with autologous stem cell rescue was evaluated in 32 metastatic breast cancer patients. The schedule was the final part of two high-dose chemotherapy programs, including an induction phase with three courses of conventional chemotherapy with epirubicin (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) plus three courses of docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and a first high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) or melphalan (160 mg/m2) plus thiotepa (600 mg/m2). The final second autograft phase included mitoxantrone (60 mg/m2) associated with melphalan (160 mg/m2) and autologous stem cell rescue infusion. The median duration of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 9 (range, 7-13) and 11.5 (range, 9-29) days. The median number of units of erythrocytes and platelets transfused was 1 (0-11) and 4 (1-9), respectively. Fever for a median of 2 (0-8) days developed in 71.8% of the patients. Mucositis was observed in 81.2% (WHO grade 3-4 in 25%). No acute or late cardiac toxicity was observed. One patient died because of a transplant-unrelated cause. The response according to the program phase showed an increased rate of complete response, from 12.5% at the end of conventional chemotherapy to 21.9% after the first high-dose chemotherapy course, to increase to 43.9% after the treatment with mitoxantrone-melphalan. We conclude that a conditioning regimen with high dose mitoxantrone-melphalan fits well within the high-dose chemotherapy program.     

Gemcitabine combined with epirubicin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study

This phase II study of gemcitabine and epirubicin evaluated the activity and toxicity in advanced breast cancer. Female patients with stage IIIB or IV breast cancer received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and then epirubicin 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. Thirty-five patients with stage IV disease, a median age of 59 years (range, 39-73), and a median Karnofsky performance status of 90 (range, 60-100) were enrolled. Fourteen (40.0%) patients received prior chemotherapy (12 adjuvant, 4 metastatic, 2 both). Of 35 evaluable patients, 10 had PR, for an overall RR of 28.6%, and 12 (34.3%) patients had SD. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.4-9.5 months) and 17.1 months (95% CI, 11.2-19.9 months), respectively. WHO grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 51.5% of patients without febrile neutropenia, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 29.4% of patients without hemorrhage or platelet transfusions. The most common nonhematologic toxicities were grade 3 alopecia (38.2%) and nausea/vomiting (11.4%). There were no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities. Gemcitabine plus epirubicin is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Future studies should continue to evaluate the impact of various schedules on outcome.     

The feasibility of FEC (75) as adjuvant chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients

Recently, high-dose FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) has been increasingly used in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Japan. However, the safety and tolerability of high-dose FEC are not well evaluated in Japanese breast cancer patients. We studied the feasibility of FEC (75) (fluorouracil: 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin: 75 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide:500 mg/m(2), q 3 w, 6 cycles) as adjuvant chemotherapy for 59 primary breast cancer patients. Out of these patients, 56 (94.9%) finished 6 cycles-FEC. The mean epirubicin dose received was 431.7 mg/m(2) (95.9% of the intended dose of 450 mg/m(2)). Forty-five (76.2%) of 59 patients experienced neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, while the rates of febrile neutropenia (grade 3) and infection (grade 2) were 3.4% and 10.2%, respectively. Anemia (88.2%), fatigue (42.4%), nausea (40.6%), liver dysfunction (40.7%), and vomiting (18.7%) occurred, however most of them were mild and categorized into grade 1 or 2. No patients developed any cardiac failure symptoms. This study shows FEC (75) is well tolerable as adjuvant chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients.     

Methotrexate-paclitaxel-epirubicin-carboplatin (M-TEC) combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced bladder cancer: an open label phase II study

The present phase II study aimed to define the application of a novel regimen incorporating methotrexate, paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin (M-TEC) in advanced bladder cancer, essentially as an M-VAC-like regimen, by substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin, doxorubicin by epirubicin and vinblastine by paclitaxel. Forty patients with advanced bladder cancer entered the study; 34 males/6 females, median age: 68 (range, 59-76), median PS (Karnovsky): 80, without receiving prior chemotherapy. Disease extention was as follows; 11/40 had local recurrence, 6/40 liver metastases, 14/40 lung metastases, bone and lymph node 8/40, bones-lymph node-lung metastases 4, lymph node and liver 4/40, lymph node-liver and lung metastases 2/40. Drug schedule and doses were as follows: paclitaxel 180 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC = 5 (according to creatinine clearance, based on Calvert's formula), and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 were administered during day 1, whereas methotrexate 30 mg/m2 and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 were administered on day 14. All patients were evaluable for response with 24/40 responding [response rate (RR) 60%]; 10/40 (25%) CR, 14/40 (35%) PR, 9/40 (22.5%) SD, and 7/40 (17.5%) PD. Symptomatic improvement was observed in 50% of patients. The median duration of response was 22 (14-32) weeks, median time-to-progression (TTP) 33 (12-44) weeks, and median survival was 56 (20-84) weeks. Toxicity was well accepted and was mainly neutropenia > grade 3: 17%, anemia >grade 3: 16%, thrombocytopenia > grade 2: 6%, nausea & vomiting mainly > grade 2: 31%, according to the administered chemotherapy cycles, whereas fatigue grade 2-3: 19%, neurotoxicity grade 1-2 13% of patients, and alopecia grade 2 was observed in all patients. The present pilot study indicates the feasibility of the M-TEC combination for bladder cancer with acceptable toxicity.     

Feasibility of radiotherapy after high-dose dense chemotherapy with epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, and paclitaxel for patients with high-risk Stage II-III breast cancer

PURPOSE: To verify the feasibility of, and quantify the risk of, pneumonitis from locoregional radiotherapy (RT) after high-dose dense chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in patients with high-risk Stage II-III breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment consisted of a mobilizing course of epirubicin 150 mg/m2, preceded by dexrazoxane (Day 1), paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (Day 2), and filgrastim; followed by three courses of epirubicin 150 mg/m2, preceded by dexrazoxane (Day 1), paclitaxel 400 mg/m2 (Day 2), and peripheral blood progenitor cell support and filgrastim, every 16-19 days. After chemotherapy, patients were treated with locoregional RT, which included the whole breast or the chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular area. RESULTS: Overall, 64 of 69 patients were evaluable. The interval between the end of chemotherapy and the initiation of RT was at least 1.5-2 months (mean 2). No treatment-related death was reported. After a median follow-up of 27 months from RT (range 5-77 months), neither clinically relevant radiation pneumonitis nor congestive heart failure had been reported. Minor and transitory lung and cardiac toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Sequential high doses of epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, and paclitaxel did not adversely affect the tolerability of locoregional RT in breast cancer patients. The risk of pneumonitis was not affected by the use of sequential paclitaxel with an interval of at least 1.5-2 months between the end of chemotherapy and the initiation of RT. Long-term follow-up is needed to define the risk of cardiotoxicity in these patients.     

Multicentric phase II trial of gemcitabine plus epirubicin plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

In this phase II, multicentre trial, patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with a combination of gemcitabine, epirubicin and paclitaxel (GET). The primary objective of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity in terms of complete responce (CR) and overall response rate of the GET combination in this patient population. Patients with no prior treatment for MBC, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion received gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) over 30 min on days 1 and 4, followed by epirubicin i.v. at 90 mg m(-2) on day 1, and paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) over 3 h on day 1, every 21 days, up to eight courses. From May 1999 to June 2000, 48 patients were enrolled from seven Italian institutions. A total of 297 chemotherapy courses were administered with a median of six cycles patient(-1) (range 1-8). Seven patients (15%) obtained CR and 27 patients (56%) had partial responce, for an overall response rate of 71% (95% CI: 58.3-83.7). After a median follow-up of 23.7 months (range 7.0-34.4), median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.7), and median overall survival 25.9 months. The main haematological toxicity consisted of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia that occurred in 62% of cycles (22% grade 4 and 40% grade 3). The GET combination is active and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for MBC.     

Combining platinum, paclitaxel and anthracycline in patients with advanced gynaecological malignancy

Two meta-analyses have suggested that the addition of an anthracycline to platinum-based chemotherapy may improve survival in advanced ovarian cancer, and two randomised trials have demonstrated superiority of paclitaxel over cyclophosphamide in platinum combinations. A combination of platinum, anthracycline and paclitaxel would, therefore, be a reasonable experimental arm of any future randomised trial in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Patients who required chemotherapy for EOC but were ineligible for standard trials or had other gynaecological tumours that required similar platinum-based chemotherapy were considered for this pilot. The platinum/anthracycline/paclitaxel regimen (G-CAT) was given 3-weekly and consisted of doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) or epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) bolus, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (i.v.) over 3 h and either cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (i.v.) or carboplatin AUC 6, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at the neutrophil nadir. Different combinations were used in order to determine the least toxic regimen. Toxicity and response were assessed according to CTC and WHO criteria, respectively. 26 patients entered the study, 13 with EOC and 13 with other gynaecological cancers (peritoneal, fallopian tube, mixed Mullerian). Median age was 49 years (range: 27-67). 8 patients received carboplatin/doxorubicin/paclitaxel, 8 cisplatin/doxorubicin/paclitaxel and 10 carboplatin/epirubicin/paclitaxel. A total of 135 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered, with a median of 6 cycles per patient (range: 2-6). 54 (40%) cycles required G-CSF support and 17 (65%) patients required at least one dose reduction. All patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and 13 (50%) patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (12 of whom had received carboplatin). There were 4 (15%) patients with grade 3/4 infections but no septic deaths. Non-haematological toxicities were manageable, lethargy occurred in 75% of cisplatin-treated patients. Grade 1/2 cardiotoxicity, as assessed pre- and post-treatment by left ventricular ejection fraction, was observed in 6/13 (46%) patients who had received doxorubicin and 2/7 (29%) epirubicin-treated patients. No clinically detectable cardiac toxicity was encountered. The response rate in 25 evaluable patients was 76% (12 CR, 7 PR). Dose intensity was highest in the carboplatin/epirubicin/paclitaxel combination. G-CAT shows high activity and can be administered safely, but only very fit patients are suitable for this regimen as it is associated with considerable toxicity. Carboplatin/epirubicin/paclitaxel was the best tolerated regimen overall.     

A phase II trial of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced breast cancer

Initial trials of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer yielded high response rates but significant cardiac toxicity was observed. In this phase II trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with epirubicin. Patients with advanced breast cancer, performance status 0-2, measurable disease, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, who may have received adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) followed by a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-three eligible patients were treated at six centres. 67% patients received the maximum of six cycles. The response rate was 54% (95% CI 38-69%), 12% CR and 42% PR. Estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4-10.0) and estimated median overall survival was 17.9 months (95% CI 14.2-25.7). Four patients had a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > or =20% of baseline value, and in two patients the LVEF decreased to below the lower limit of normal, but no patient developed clinical evidence of cardiac failure. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 56% cycles, but only 4% of cycles were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 non-haematologic toxicity was uncommon. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) is a well tolerated, promising regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

Increased feasibility of weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Primary systemic therapy (PST) with a combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel achieves high response rates in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), but considerable toxicity occurs and the patient's compliance is poor. In this open-label phase II trial toxicity of a weekly administration schedule was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: On days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle, 45 patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer received epirubicin (35 mg/m(2), intravenous bolus) followed by paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) in 500 ml of normal saline infused over 3 h) for 3 cycles. Surgery was done 2 weeks after primary chemotherapy, followed by another 6 cycles of adjuvant CEF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 70 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median tumor size before and after PST was 6.0 and 2.0 cm, respectively. The clinical response rate was 96%, including 24% complete remission; 5 patients (11%) achieved pathologically complete response (pCR) including 3 patients with carcinoma in situ. Only 5 (11%) patients underwent breast conserving surgery although there were 15 patients suitable. Axillary nodes were negative in 16 (36%) of the 45 patients. Febrile neutropenia was found in 1 patient. There was no severe cardiac toxicity or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: PST with weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel was an effective and well-tolerated combination for LABC, although only few patients underwent breast conserving surgery.     

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell support as front-line therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with either filgrastim alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Patients then received three or four cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 16), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), and topotecan (10-15 mg/m(2)), with the latter two agents administered as 24-hour infusions and supported with PBSC and filgrastim. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled onto the trial and were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis and prolonged hematopoietic recovery. The maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan was 12.5 mg/m(2) when given with high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel for three cycles. Four cycles were able to be given with a dose of topotecan of 10 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics of each compound were not affected by the other agents. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients with assessable disease responded. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan can be safely administered with filgrastim and PBSC support. The recommended doses for phase II study are carboplatin AUC 16, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and topotecan 10 mg/m(2). Trials are currently being conducted with this regimen as front-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and extensive small-cell carcinoma. This approach remains experimental and should be used only in the context of a clinical trial.     

Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel versus the combination, as first-line chemotherapy, in advanced breast cancer: a randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of two different schedules of epirubicin and paclitaxel, as first-line chemotherapy, in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1997 until May 1999, 183 eligible patients with ABC entered the study. Chemotherapy in group A (93 patients) consisted of four cycles of epirubicin at a dose of 110 mg/m(2) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) in a 3-hour infusion. All cycles were repeated every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The therapeutic regimen in group B (90 patients) consisted of epirubicin (80 mg/m(2)) immediately followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) in a 3-hour infusion) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients (85%) in group A and 72 patients (80%) in group B completed treatment. The median relative dose-intensity of epirubicin was 0.96 in both groups, and that of paclitaxel was 0.96 and 0.97 in groups A and B, respectively. The complete response rate was higher in group A (21.5% v 9% P =.02). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the two groups (55% v 42%, P =.10). Severe neutropenia was more frequently observed with concurrent treatment. After a median follow-up of 16.5 months, median time to progression was 10 months in group A and 8.5 months in group B (P =.27), and median survival was 21.5 and 20 months, respectively (P =.17). CONCLUSION: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in overall response rate between dose-dense sequential administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel compared with the combination of the two drugs given on the same day, even though the sequential treatment resulted in a significantly higher complete response rate.     

Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, followed by CMF with or without paclitaxel, in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel primarily on disease-free survival (DFS) and secondarily on overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1997 until November 2000, 604 patients with T1-3N1M0 or T3N0M0 tumors were randomized to three cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of 'intensified' CMF (cyclophosphamide 840 mg/m2, methotrexate 47 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 840 mg/m2) (group A), or to four cycles of epirubicin followed by four cycles of CMF, as in group A (group B). All cycles were given every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 61.7 months for group A and 62 months for group B. The 3-year DFS was 80% in group A and 77% in group B. Survival rates were 93% and 90%, respectively. The effect of treatment on the hazard of death was different according to hormonal receptor status. More specifically, in patients with negative receptor status the hazard of death was significantly higher for group B (hazard ratio 2.42). Both regimens were well tolerated and severe acute side-effects were infrequent. No cases of severe cardiotoxicity or acute leukemia were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in DFS or OS between the two treatment groups. However, our study has shown clearly that high-dose paclitaxel can be safely incorporated to dose-dense sequential chemotherapy.     

Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix with epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to explore whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin could improve the operability and pathological response rate in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Between April 1996 and July 2000, 42 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix, FIGO stage Ib(2)-IVa, were treated with two or three 21-day cycles of an epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) regimen. RESULTS: All patients were eligible for evaluation of toxicity and response. A total of 92 courses of therapy were administered. Three patients had a 20% reduction from the starting dose due to haematological toxicity. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 15% of cycles, requiring G-CSF support in half of them. Major non-haematological toxicity consisted of grade 3 alopecia (100%), and grade 3 nausea and vomiting (40%). A total of 33 clinical responses (78.5%, 95% CI 63.8-93.2) were recorded, 8 complete responses (CR) and 25 partial responses (PR). Of the 42 patients, 32 (76.2%) underwent radical surgery. At pathological examination 8 complete or microscopic pathological responses, 17 PRs, and 9 patients with stable disease were observed. The median follow-up time was 17 months for the 42 patients enrolled (range 3-62 months). Among the patients submitted to radical surgery, five recurrences were observed, with a median disease-free survival of 47 months. Median overall survival had not been reached at the time of this report. These results appear to be in the range reported for other neoadjuvant cisplatin-based regimens not including paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin combination followed by radical surgery proved to be a safe and effective approach to advanced cervical cancer.     

A phase II study of high-dose epirubicin (EPI) plus cyclophosphamide (CPA) with G-CSF for breast cancer patients with visceral metastases or hormone-independent tumors: a trial of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose epirubicin (EPI) plus cyclophosphamide (CPA) therapy, a phase II study of EPI, 130 mg/m2, plus CPA, 1000 mg/m2, with G-CSF every 3 weeks was carried out for 51 advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Fifty out of the 51 patients who were eligible for our criteria were treated with this regimen as first-line chemotherapy for visceral metastases or hormone-independent tumors. In this trial, 203 cycles were administered with an average of four cycles per patients. In 50 patients who were evaluable for response, there were 7 complete (CR) and 25 partial responses (PR) with an overall response rate of 64% (95% confidence interval, 50.1-75.9%). Symptomatic and hematological acute toxicity more than grade 3 occurred frequently; however, no treatment-related death occurred. The incidence of toxicities (> or = grade 3) was as follows: leukopenia 98%, thrombocytopenia 42%, nausea/vomiting 56% and hair loss 12%. In each cycle, daily administration of 2 micrograms/kg G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) was given on days 2-15 subcutaneously. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was low. Arrhythmia (< or = grade 2) was observed in 8% and a slight decrease of ejection fraction index (< or = grade 2) was observed in 2% in this trial. The median follow-up period for patients was 37.2 (24.6-51.5) months and the median survival period was 17.4 months. These data indicate that high-dose EPI + CPA combination chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated for breast cancer patients with visceral metastases or hormone-independent tumors. A randomized trial of high-dose EPI vs conventional chemotherapy is required to ascertain the usefulness of this regimen.      

Epirubicin--docetaxel combination in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a dose-finding and efficacy study

The aim of the study was to define a regular and tolerable dose of the epirubicin-docetaxel combination in first-line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Sixty-five women with measurable and/or evaluable disease were treated with epirubicin escalated from 60 to 110 mg/m(2) according to 5 dose levels, in combination with a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel, every 21 days for 6 cycles, without preventive use of hematopoietic growth factors or antibiotics. Forty-three women received adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of anthracyline- or anthracenedione-based regimens in 39 cases (60%). Twenty-seven women were treated in the phase I study (3 at epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and 6 at each subsequent dose level). Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of grade III asthenia and febrile neutropenia (epirubicin 75 mg/m(2)), grade IV thrombopenia and grade III asthenia (epirubicin 90 mg/m(2)), grade IV stomatitis and grade III diarrhea (epirubicin 100 mg/m(2)), and grade III diarrhea (epirubicin 110 mg/m(2)). In the phase II study, an additional 38 women were treated at epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 100 mg/m(2). During the 349 cycles delivered, grade IV neutropenia occurred in 90%; febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred in 62 (17.8%) and lasted more than 3 days in 12 (3.4%). Nonhematologic toxicity was acceptable. Three left ventricular ejection fraction depressions occurred and normalized during follow-up. The overall response rate in the 62 evaluable women was 69.4% (range: 58--81%), with a median duration of 7.8 months. After 26 months of follow-up, the median time to progression was 9.1 months and median overall survival was 22.7 months. On the basis of efficacy and toxicity, the recommended dose of the combination is epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2).     

Epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF support in first line metastatic breast cancer: a randomized phase II study of dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy

An increased dose-intensity can be achieved by either higher dose of chemotherapy per cycle (dose-escalation) or by shortening the interval between cycles (dose-dense). This multicenter randomized phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of two different approaches: epirubicin 110 mg/m(2) combined with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) every 21 days and epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) combined with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 10 days, both supported with G-CSF. Patients with advanced breast cancer and without prior palliative chemotherapy were scheduled for 6 cycles. Evaluable for response were 101 patients and for toxicity 106 patients. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred in 39% of patients in the dose-escalated arm and in 29% of the dose-dense arm, mainly febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity and (asymptomatic) cardiotoxicity. The median delivered cumulative doses for epirubicin/paclitaxel were 656/1194 and 448/1045 mg/m(2), treatment durations were 126 and 61 days, and delivered dose intensities were 36/67 and 51/120 mg/m(2)/week for the dose-escalated and dose-dense arm, respectively. Response rates were 75 and 70%, the progression-free survival 6 and 7 months, respectively. Dose-dense chemotherapy with a lower cumulative dose, a halved treatment time, but a higher dose-intensity may be as effective and safe as dose-escalated chemotherapy. The value of dose-densification over standard scheduled chemotherapy regimes yet needs to be determined.