Light-evoked excitatory synaptic currents of X-type retinal ganglion cells

The excitatory amino acid receptor (EAAR) types involved in the generation of light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were examined in X-type retinal ganglion cells. Using isolated and sliced preparations of cat and ferret retina, the light-evoked EPSCs of X cells were isolated by adding picrotoxin and strychnine to the bath to remove synaptic inhibition. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors contribute significantly to the light-evoked EPSCs of ON- and OFF-X cells at many different holding potentials. An NMDA receptor contribution to the EPSCs was observable when retinal synaptic inhibition was either normally present or pharmacologically blocked. NMDA receptors formed 80% of the peak light-evoked EPSC at a holding potential of -40 mV; however, even at -80 mV, 20% of the light-evoked EPSC was NMDA-mediated. An alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor-mediated component to the light-evoked EPSCs predominated at a holding potential of -80 mV. The light-evoked EPSC was blocked by the AMPA receptor-selective antagonist GYKI52466 (50-100 microM). The AMPA receptor-mediated EPSC component had a linear current-voltage relation. AMPA receptors form the main non-NMDA EAAR current on both ON- and OFF- X ganglion cell dendrites. When synaptic transmission was blocked by the addition of Cd(2+) to the Ringer, application of kainate directly to ganglion cells evoked excitatory currents that were strongly blocked by GYKI52466. Experiments using selective EAAR modulators showed the AMPA receptor-selective modulator cyclothiazide potentiated glutamate-evoked currents on X cells, while the kainate receptor-selective modulator concanavalin A (ConA) had no effect on kainate-evoked currents. Whereas the present study confirms the general notion that AMPA EAAR-mediated currents are transient and NMDA receptor-mediated currents are sustained, current-voltage relations of the light-evoked EPSC at different time points showed the contributions of these two receptor types significantly overlap. Both NMDA and AMPA EAARs can transmit transient and sustained visual signals in X ganglion cells, suggesting that much signal shaping occurs presynaptically in bipolar cells.     

I4AA-Sensitive chloride current contributes to the center light responses of bipolar cells in the tiger salamander retina

Light-evoked currents in depolarizing and hyperpolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs and HBCs) were recorded under voltage-clamp conditions in living retinal slices of the larval tiger salamander. Responses to illumination at the center of the DBCs' and HBCs' receptive fields were mediated by two postsynaptic currents: DeltaI(C), a glutamate-gated cation current with a reversal potential near 0 mV, and DeltaI(Cl), a chloride current with a reversal potential near -60 mV. In DBCs DeltaI(C) was suppressed by L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (L-AP4), and in HBCs it was suppressed by 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX). In both DBCs and HBCs DeltaI(Cl) was suppressed by imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA), a GABA receptor agonist and GABA(C) receptor antagonist. In all DBCs and HBCs examined, 10 microM I4AA eliminated DeltaI(Cl) and the light-evoked current became predominately mediated by DeltaI(C). The addition of 20 microM L-AP4 to the DBCs or 50 microM DNQX to HBCs completely abolished DeltaI(C). Focal application of glutamate at the inner plexiform layer elicited chloride currents in bipolar cells by depolarizing amacrine cells that release GABA at synapses on bipolar cell axon terminals, and such glutamate-induced chloride currents in DBCs and HBCs could be reversibly blocked by 10 microM I4AA. These experiments suggest that the light-evoked, I4AA-sensitive chloride currents (DeltaI(Cl)) in DBCs and HBCs are mediated by narrow field GABAergic amacrine cells that activate GABA(C) receptors on bipolar cell axon terminals. Picrotoxin (200 microM) or (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4yl) methyphosphinic acid (TPMPA) (2 other GABA(C) receptor antagonists) did not block (but enhanced and broadened) the light-evoked DeltaI(Cl), although they decreased the chloride current induced by puff application of GABA or glutamate. The light response of narrow field amacrine cells were not affected by I4AA, but were substantially enhanced and broadened by picrotoxin. These results suggest that there are at least two types of GABA(C) receptors in bipolar cells: one exhibits stronger I4AA sensitivity than the other, but both can be partially blocked by picrotoxin. The GABA receptors in narrow field amacrine cells are I4AA insensitive and picrotoxin sensitive. The light-evoked DeltaI(Cl) in bipolar cells are mediated by the more strongly I4AA-sensitive GABA(C) receptors. Picrotoxin, although acting as a partial GABA(C) receptor antagonist in bipolar cells, does not suppress DeltaI(Cl) because its presynaptic effects on amacrine cell light responses override its antagonistic postsynaptic actions.     

Characterization of receptors for glutamate and GABA in retinal neurons

Glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are major excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters in the vertebrate retina, "a genuine neural center" (Ramón y Cajal, 1964, Recollections of My Life, C.E. Horne (Translater) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Photoreceptors, generating visual signals, and bipolar cells, mediating signal transfer from photoreceptors to ganglion cells, both release glutamate, which induces and/or changes the activity of the post-synaptic neurons (horizontal and bipolar cells for photoreceptors; amacrine and ganglion cells for bipolar cells). Horizontal and amacrine cells, which mediate lateral interaction in the outer and inner retina respectively, use GABA as a principal neurotransmitter. In recent years, glutamate receptors and GABA receptors in the retina have been extensively studied, using multi-disciplinary approaches. In this article some important advances in this field are reviewed, with special reference to retinal information processing. Photoreceptors possess metabotropic glutamate receptors and several subtypes of GABA receptors. Most horizontal cells express AMPA receptors, which may be predominantly assembled from flop slice variants. In addition, these cells also express GABAA and GABAC receptors. Signal transfer from photoreceptors to bipolar cells is rather complicated. Whereas AMPA/KA receptors mediate transmission for OFF type bipolar cells, several subtypes of glutamate receptors, both ionotropic and metabotropic, are involved in the generation of light responses of ON type bipolar cells. GABAA and GABAC receptors with distinct kinetics are differentially expressed on dendrites and axon terminals of both ON and OFF bipolar cells, mediating inhibition from horizontal cells and amacrine cells. Amacrine cells possess ionotropic glutamate receptors, whereas ganglion cells express both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. GABAA receptors exist in amacrine and ganglion cells. Physiological data further suggest that GABAC receptors may be involved in the activity of these neurons. Moreover, responses of these retinal third order neurons are modulated by GABAB receptors, and in ganglion cells there exist several subtypes of GABAB receptors. A variety of glutamate receptor and GABA receptor subtypes found in the retina perform distinct functions, thus providing a wide range of neural integration and versatility of synaptic transmission. Perspectives in this research field are presented.     

Synaptic pathways that shape the excitatory drive in an OFF retinal ganglion cell

Different types of retinal ganglion cells represent distinct spatiotemporal filters that respond selectively to specific features in the visual input. Much about the circuitry and synaptic mechanisms that underlie such specificity remains to be determined. This study examines how N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor signaling combines with other excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms to shape the output of small-field OFF brisk-sustained ganglion cells (OFF-BSGCs) in the rabbit retina. We used voltage clamp to separately resolve NMDA, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), and inhibitory inputs elicited by stimulation of the receptive field center. Three converging circuits were identified. First is a direct glutamatergic input, arising from OFF cone bipolar cells (CBCs), which is mediated by synaptic NMDA and AMPA receptors. The NMDA input was saturated at 10% contrast, whereas the AMPA input increased monotonically up to 60% contrast. We propose that NMDA inputs selectively enhance sensitivity to low contrasts. The OFF bipolar cells, mediating this direct excitatory input, express dendritic kainate (KA) receptors, which are resistant to the nonselective AMPA/KA receptor antagonist, 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide disodium salt (NBQX), but are suppressed by a GluK1- and GluK3-selective antagonist, (S)-1-(2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-3-(2-carboxy-thiophene-3-yl-methyl)-5-methylpyrimidine-2,4-dione (UBP-310). The second circuit entails glycinergic crossover inhibition, arising from ON-CBCs and mediated by AII amacrine cells, which modulate glutamate release from the OFF-CBC terminals. The third circuit also comprises glycinergic crossover inhibition, which is driven by the ON pathway; however, this inhibition impinges directly on the OFF-BSGCs and is mediated by an unknown glycinergic amacrine cell that expresses AMPA but not KA receptors.     

Activation of mGluR5 modulates GABA(A) receptor function in retinal amacrine cells

Amacrine cells in the vertebrate retina receive glutamatergic input from bipolar cells and make synapses onto bipolar cells, ganglion cells, and other amacrine cells. Recent studies indicate that amacrine cells express metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and that signaling within the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the retina might be modulated by mGluR activity. This study tests the hypothesis that activation of mGluR5 modulates GABA(A) receptor function in retinal amacrine cells. Whole cell voltage-clamp recordings were combined with pharmacology to establish the identity of the ionotropic GABA receptors expressed in primary cultures of chick amacrine cells and to determine how mGluR5 activity affected the behavior of those receptors. Application of GABA (20 microM) produced currents that reversed at -58.2 +/- 0.9 mV, near the predicted Cl(-) reversal potential of -59 mV. The GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (50 microM), completely blocked the GABA-gated currents. cis-4-Aminocrotonic acid (CACA; 100 microM), a GABA(C) receptor agonist, produced small currents that were not blocked by the GABA(C) antagonist, (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl) methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA; 20 microM), but were completely blocked by bicuculline. These results indicate that cultured amacrine cells express GABA(A) receptors exclusively. Activating mGluR5 with (RS)-2-chloro-5-hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG; 300 microM) enhanced GABA-gated currents by 10.0 +/- 1.5%. Buffering internal Ca(2+) with BAPTA (10 mM) blocked the CHPG-dependent enhancement. Activation of PKC with the cell-permeable PKC activators (-)-7-octylindolactam V, phorbol 12-myristate 13 acetate (PMA), or 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) also enhanced GABA-gated currents in a dose-dependent manner. Preactivation of PKC occluded the mGluR5-dependent enhancement, and inhibition of Ca-dependent PKC isotypes with G?6976 (35 nM) suppressed the effects of mGluR5 activation, suggesting that mGluR5 and PKC are part of the same pathway. To determine if mGluR5-dependent enhancement occurred at synaptic GABA(A) receptors, postsynaptic currents were recorded in the presence of CHPG. On average, the mean amplitudes of the quantal events were increased by about 18% when mGluR5 was activated. These results indicate that activation of mGluR5 enhances GABA-gated current in cultured amacrine cells in a manner that is both Ca(2+)- and PKC-dependent. These results support the possibility that glutamate released from bipolar cells can modulate the function of GABAergic amacrine cells and alter signaling in the inner plexiform layer.     

Potentiating effects of 4-[2-(phenylsulfonylamino)ethylthio]-2,6-difluoro-phenoxyaceta mide (PEPA) on excitatory synaptic transmission in dentate granule cells

A novel sulfonylamino compound, 4-[2-(phenylsulfonylamino)-ethylthio]-2,6-difluoro-phenoxyaceta mide (PEPA) has been shown to selectively potentiate glutamate-induced currents in Xenopus oocytes expressing recombinant AMPA receptor subunits, GluR1-GluR4, by attenuation of desensitization. Here, we examined the effects of PEPA on responses to excitatory amino acids as well as on excitatory synaptic transmission in dentate granule cells of rat hippocampal slices using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. PEPA at 100 microM produced a 3-4-fold increases in the peak amplitude of current responses to AMPA and glutamate applied iontophoretically in the dentate granule cells, whereas it showed no effect on NMDA-induced currents. Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked in these neurons by stimulation of the perforant path had fast and slow components mediated by AMPA and NMDA receptors, respectively. PEPA at concentrations between 10 and 100 microM potentiated only the AMPA component of the EPSC (AMPA EPSC) in a dose-dependent manner without affecting the NMDA component. Although the potentiating effect of PEPA on the amplitude of the AMPA EPSC was weaker than that on the AMPA-induced current, it clearly prolonged the duration of the EPSC. PEPA at 100 microM increased the peak amplitude of the AMPA EPSC by 17%, and increased the area enclosed by the AMPA EPSC by 72%.     

Kainate receptor-mediated synaptic currents in mudpuppy inner retinal neurons reduced by D-O-phosphoserine

1. The effects of D-O-phosphoserine (DOS) were examined on proximal neurons in the superfused mudpuppy retinal-eyecup preparation by measuring their synaptically evoked whole-cell currents with the use of patch-clamp electrodes. 2. DOS reduced the light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) of amacrine and ganglion cells. This suppression was present even though the center responses of both ON- and OFF-bipolar cells were unaffected by DOS. 3. When recordings were done under voltage-clamp conditions. DOS diminished the magnitude of light-evoked synaptic currents associated with a reduction in synaptic conductance. 4. To determine which acidic amino acid receptor mediated the network-selective action of DOS, various glutamate agonists were tested against this excitatory amino acid receptor (EAAR) antagonist. DOS blocked the depolarizing effects of kainate (KA), but not those of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or quisqualate (QQ). Thus DOS was a selective KA antagonist, and KA receptors appear to be the dominant EAAR subtype that mediates synaptic inputs into the inner retina of the mudpuppy.     

Expression and localization of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits in the goldfish retina--an in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical study

The expression and distribution of AMPA, kainate and NMDA glutamate receptor subunits was studied in the goldfish retina. For the immunocytochemical localization of the AMPA receptor antisera against GluR2, GluR2/3 and GluR4 were used, and for in situ hybridization rat specific probes for GluR1 and GluR2 and goldfish specific probes for GluR3 and GluR4 were used. The localization of the low affinity kainate receptor and NMDA receptor was studied using antisera against GluR5-7 and NR1. All AMPA receptor subtypes were demonstrated to be present in the goldfish retina both by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. In situ hybridization revealed expression of all AMPA receptors subunit at the inner border of the INL. Only GluR3 was also strongly expressed in the outer border of the INL. Some of the ganglion cells displayed a strong signal for GluR1, GluR3 and GluR4. GluR1-immunoreactivity was present in subsets of bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells. GluR2 and GluR2/3-immunoreactivity was mainly localized in the outer plexiform layer. GluR2 and GluR2/3-immunoreactivity are associated with the photoreceptor synaptic terminals. GluR4-immunoreactivity is present on Müller cells in the inner retina and on dendrites of bipolar cells in the OPL, whereas GluR5-7-immunoreactivity was prominently present on horizontal cell axon terminals. Finally, NR1-immunoreactivity was confined to amacrine cells, the inner plexiform layer and ganglion cells. This study shows that there is a strong heterogeneity of glutamate receptor subunit expression in the various layers of the retina. Of the AMPA receptor subunits GluR3 seems to be expressed the most widely in all layers with strong glutamatergic synaptic interactions whereas all the other subunits seem to have a more restricted expressed pattern.     

GABAA, GABAC and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition differentially affects light-evoked signalling from mouse retinal rod bipolar cells

Rod bipolar cells relay visual signals evoked by dim illumination from the outer to the inner retina. GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells contact rod bipolar cell terminals, where they modulate transmitter release and contribute to the receptive field properties of third order neurones. However, it is not known how these distinct inhibitory inputs affect rod bipolar cell output and subsequent retinal processing. To determine whether GABA_A, GABA_C and glycine receptors made different contributions to light-evoked inhibition, we recorded light-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (L-IPSCs) from rod bipolar cells mediated by each pharmacologically isolated receptor. All three receptors contributed to L-IPSCs, but their relative roles differed; GABA_C receptors transferred significantly more charge than GABA_A and glycine receptors. We determined how these distinct inhibitory inputs affected rod bipolar cell output by recording light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (L-EPSCs) from postsynaptic AII and A17 amacrine cells. Consistent with their relative contributions to L-IPSCs, GABA_C receptor activation most effectively reduced the L-EPSCs, while glycine and GABA_A receptor activation reduced the L-EPSCs to a lesser extent. We also found that GABAergic L-IPSCs in rod bipolar cells were limited by GABA_A receptor-mediated inhibition between amacrine cells. We show that GABA_A, GABA_C and glycine receptors mediate functionally distinct inhibition to rod bipolar cells, which differentially modulated light-evoked rod bipolar cell output. Our findings suggest that modulating the relative proportions of these inhibitory inputs could change the characteristics of rod bipolar cell output.     

Synaptic regulation of the light-dependent oscillatory currents in starburst amacrine cells of the mouse retina

Responses of on-center starburst amacrine cells to steady light stimuli were recorded in the dark-adapted mouse retina. The response to spots of dim white light appear to show two components, an initial peak that correspond to the onset of the light stimulus and a series of oscillations that ride on top of the initial peak relaxation. The frequency of oscillations during light stimulation was three time higher than the frequency of spontaneous oscillations recorded in the dark. The light-evoked responses in starburst cells were exclusively dependent on the release of glutamate likely from presynaptic bipolar axon terminals and the binding of glutamate to AMPA/kainate receptors because they were blocked by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxalene-2,3-dione. The synaptic pathway responsible for the light responses was blocked by AP4, an agonist of metabotropic glutamate receptors that hyperpolarize on-center bipolar cells on activation. Light responses were inhibited by the calcium channel blockers cadmium ions and nifedipine, suggesting that the release of glutamate was calcium dependent. The oscillatory component of the response was specifically inhibited by blocking the glutamate transporter with d-threo-beta-benzyloxyaspartic acid, suggesting that glutamate reuptake is necessary for the oscillatory release. GABAergic antagonists bicuculline, SR 95531, and picrotoxin increased the amplitude of the initial peak while they inhibit the frequency of oscillations. TTX had a similar effect. Strychnine, the blocker of glycine receptors did not affect the initial peak but strongly decreased the oscillations frequency. These inhibitory inputs onto the bipolar axon terminals shape and synchronize the oscillatory component.     

Spontaneous oscillatory activity of starburst amacrine cells in the mouse retina

Using patch-clamp techniques, we investigated the characteristics of the spontaneous oscillatory activity displayed by starburst amacrine cells in the mouse retina. At a holding potential of -70 mV, oscillations appeared as spontaneous, rhythmic inward currents with a frequency of approximately 3.5 Hz and an average maximal amplitude of approximately 120 pA. Application of TEA, a potassium channel blocker, increased the amplitude of oscillatory currents by >70% but reduced their frequency by approximately 17%. The TEA effects did not appear to result from direct actions on starburst cells, but rather a modulation of their synaptic inputs. Oscillatory currents were inhibited by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxalene-2,3-dione (CNQX), an antagonist of AMPA/kainate receptors, indicating that they were dependent on a periodic glutamatergic input likely from presynaptic bipolar cells. The oscillations were also inhibited by the calcium channel blockers cadmium and nifedipine, suggesting that the glutamate release was calcium dependent. Application of AP4, an agonist of mGluR6 receptors on on-center bipolar cells, blocked the oscillatory currents in starburst cells. However, application of TEA overcame the AP4 blockade, suggesting that the periodic glutamate release from bipolar cells is intrinsic to the inner plexiform layer in that, under experimental conditions, it can occur independent of photoreceptor input. The GABA receptor antagonists picrotoxin and bicuculline enhanced the amplitude of oscillations in starburst cells prestimulated with TEA. Our results suggest that this enhancement was due to a reduction of a GABAergic feedback inhibition from amacrine cells to bipolar cells and the resultant increased glutamate release. Finally, we found that some ganglion cells and other types of amacrine cell also displayed rhythmic activity, suggesting that oscillatory behavior is expressed by a number of inner retinal neurons.     

Electron microscopy of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) immunoreactivity in the inner plexiform layer of the rhesus monkey retina

Summary With indirect immunofluorescence, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), the GABA synthesizing enzyme, was localized to cell bodies in the inner half of the inner nuclear layer and a few in the outer tier of the ganglion cell layer in the rhesus monkey retina. In the inner plexiform layer there were three strongly GAD-immunoreactive laminae separated by two less immunoreactive laminae. Electron microscopy demonstrated that the GAD was contained in amacrine cells and these GAD-immunoreactive amacrines were primarily pre- and postsynaptic to biopolar cell axon terminals. The GAD-containing processes possessed small synaptic vesicles and formed synapses that could be characterized as symmetrical. Large, dense-cored vesicles were often found in the cell bodies and synaptic processes of the GAD-immunoreactive amacrine cells. As the vast majority of the synaptic input and output of the GAD-containing amacrine cells was to and from bipolar cells and the strongest GAD-immunoreactivity correlated with the endings of bipolar cells that connect with a single cone, the functional effects of GABA in the primate retina are likely to be found in the responses of single cone pathways in the inner plexiform layer.     

Characterization of the spontaneous synaptic activity of amacrine cells in the mouse retina

Amacrine cells are a heterogeneous class of interneurons that modulate the transfer of the light signals through the retina. In addition to ionotropic glutamate receptors, amacrine cells express two types of inhibitory receptors, GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) and glycine receptors (GlyRs). To characterize the functional contribution of these different receptors, spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs) were recorded with the whole cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique in acutely isolated slices of the adult mouse retina. All amacrine cells investigated (n = 47) showed spontaneous synaptic activity. In six amacrine cells, spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents could be identified by their sensitivity to kynurenic acid. They were characterized by small amplitudes [mean: -13.7 +/- 1.5 (SE) pA] and rapid decay kinetics (mean tau: 1.35 +/- 0.16 ms). In contrast, the reversal potential of sPSCs characterized by slow decay kinetics (amplitude-weighted time constant, tau(w), >4 ms) was dependent on the intracellular Cl(-) concentration (n = 7), indicating that they were spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs). In 14 of 34 amacrine cells sIPSCs were blocked by bicuculline (10 microM), indicating that they were mediated by GABA(A)Rs. Only four amacrine cells showed glycinergic sIPSCs that were inhibited by strychnine (1 microM). In one amacrine cell, sIPSCs mediated by GABA(A)Rs and GlyRs were found simultaneously. GABAergic sIPSCs could be subdivided into one group best fit by a monoexponential decay function and another biexponentially decaying group. The mean amplitude of GABAergic sIPSCs (-42.1 +/- 5.8 pA) was not significantly different from that of glycinergic sIPSCs (-28.0 +/- 8.5 pA). However, GlyRs (mean T10/90: 2.4 +/- 0.08 ms) activated significantly slower than GABA(A)Rs (mean T10/90: 1.2 +/- 0.03 ms). In addition, the decay kinetics of monoexponentially decaying GABA(A)Rs (mean tau(w): 20.3 +/- 0.50), biexponentially decaying GABA(A)Rs (mean tau(w): 30.7 +/- 0.95), and GlyRs (mean tau(w) = 25.3 +/- 1.94) were significantly different. These differences in the activation and decay kinetics of sIPSCs indicate that amacrine cells of the mouse retina express at least three types of functionally different inhibitory receptors: GlyRs and possibly two subtypes of GABA(A)Rs.     

A comparison of release kinetics and glutamate receptor properties in shaping rod–cone differences in EPSC kinetics in the salamander retina

Synaptic transmission from cones is faster than transmission from rods. Using paired simultaneous recordings from photoreceptors and second-order neurones in the salamander retina, we studied the contributions of rod–cone differences in glutamate receptor properties and synaptic release rates to shaping postsynaptic responses. Depolarizing steps evoked sustained calcium currents in rods and cones that in turn produced transient excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in horizontal and OFF bipolar cells. Cone-driven EPSCs rose and decayed faster than rod-driven EPSCs, even when comparing inputs from a rod and cone onto the same postsynaptic neurone. Thus, rod–cone differences in EPSCs reflect properties of individual rod and cone synapses. Experiments with selective AMPA and KA agonists and antagonists showed that rods and cones both contact pharmacologically similar AMPA receptors. Spontaneous miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) exhibited unimodal distributions of amplitude and half-amplitude time width and there were no rod–cone differences in mEPSC properties. To examine how release kinetics shape the EPSC, we convolved mEPSC waveforms with empirically determined release rate functions for rods and cones. The predicted EPSC waveform closely matched the actual EPSC evoked by cones, supporting a quantal release model at the photoreceptor synapse. Convolution with the rod release function also produced a good match in rod-driven cells, although the actual EPSC was often somewhat slower than the predicted EPSC, a discrepancy partly explained by rod–rod coupling. Rod–cone differences in the rates of exocytosis are thus a major factor in producing faster cone-driven responses in second-order retinal neurones.     

Creation of AMPA-silent synapses in the neonatal hippocampus

In the developing brain, many glutamate synapses have been found to transmit only NMDA receptor-mediated signaling, that is, they are AMPA-silent. This result has been taken to suggest that glutamate synapses are initially AMPA-silent when they are formed, and that AMPA signaling is acquired through activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. The present study on CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus of the neonatal rat suggests that AMPA-silent synapses are created through a form of activity-dependent silencing of AMPA signaling. We found that AMPA signaling, but not NMDA signaling, could be very rapidly silenced by presynaptic electrical stimulation at frequencies commonly used to probe synaptic function (0.05-1 Hz). Although this AMPA silencing required a rise in postsynaptic Ca(2+), it did not require activation of NMDA receptors, metabotropic glutamate receptors or voltage-gated calcium channels. The AMPA silencing, possibly explained by a removal of postsynaptic AMPA receptors, could subsequently be reversed by paired presynaptic and postsynaptic activity.     

Effect of Corticotropin-Like Intermediate Lobe Peptide on Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Glutamate Receptors and Postsynaptic GABA Receptors in Rat Brain

We studied the effect of corticotropin-like intermediate lobe peptide (CLIP) on presynaptic NMDA receptors and postsynaptic GABA, NMDA, and AMPA receptors in rat brain. CLIP inhibited presynaptic and postsynaptic NMDA receptors, but potentiated postsynaptic GABA and AMPA receptors. Our results indicate that CLIP modulates function of ionotropic receptors for glutamate and GABA. Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 147, No. 3, pp. 291–294, March, 2009     

Glial glutamate transporter 1 regulates the spatial and temporal coding of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in spinal lamina II neurons

Glutamatergic synaptic transmission is a dynamic process determined by the amount of glutamate released by presynaptic sites, the clearance of glutamate in the synaptic cleft, and the properties of postsynaptic glutamate receptors. Clearance of glutamate in the synaptic cleft depends on passive diffusion and active uptake by glutamate transporters. In this study, we examined the role of glial glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) in spinal sensory processing. Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) of substantia gelatinosa neurons recorded from spinal slices of young adult rats were analyzed before and after GLT-1 was pharmacologically blocked by dihydrokainic acid. Inhibition of GLT-1 prolonged the EPSC duration and the EPSC decay phase. The EPSC amplitudes were increased in neurons with weak synaptic input but decreased in neurons with strong synaptic input upon inhibition of GLT-1. We suggest that presynaptic inhibition, desensitization of postsynaptic AMPA receptors, and glutamate "spillover" contributed to the kinetic change of EPSCs induced by the blockade of GLT-1. Thus, GLT-1 is a key component in maintaining the spatial and temporal coding in signal transmission at the glutamatergic synapse in substantia gelatinosa neurons.     

Light-evoked responses of bipolar cells in a mammalian retina

We recorded light-evoked responses from rod and cone bipolar cells using patch-clamp techniques in a slice preparation of the rat retina. Rod bipolar cells responded to light with a sustained depolarization (ON response) followed at light offset by a slight hyperpolarization. ON and OFF cone bipolar cells were encountered, both with diverse temporal properties. The responses of rod bipolar cells were composed primarily of two components, a nonspecific cation current and a chloride current. The chloride current was reduced greatly in axotomized cells and could be suppressed by coapplication of the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline and the GABA(C) antagonist (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid. This suggests that it largely reflects feedback from GABAergic amacrine cells. The response latency of intact rod bipolar cells was shorter than that of the axotomized cells, and the sensitivity curve covered more than twice the dynamic range. Application of the GABA receptor antagonists partially mimicked the effects of axotomy. These findings suggest that functional properties of the axon terminal system-notably synaptic feedback from amacrine cells-play an important role in defining the response properties of mammalian bipolar cells.     

Excitation of cerebellar interneurons by group I metabotropic glutamate receptors

Cerebellar basket and stellate neurons (BSNs) provide feed-forward inhibition to Purkinje neurons (PNs) and thereby play a principal role in determining the output of the cerebellar cortex. During low-frequency transmission, glutamate released at parallel fiber synapses excites BSNs by binding to AMPA receptors; high-frequency transmission also recruits N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. We find that, in addition to these ligand-gated receptors, a G-protein-coupled glutamate receptor subtype participates in exciting BSNs. Stimulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1alpha (mGluR1alpha) with the mGluR agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) leads to an increase in spontaneous firing of BSNs and indirectly to an increase in the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) recorded in PNs. Under conditions in which ligand-gated glutamate receptors are blocked, parallel fiber stimulation generates a slow excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in BSNs that is inhibited by mGluR1alpha-selective antagonists. This slow EPSC is capable of increasing BSN spiking and indirectly increasing sIPSCs frequency in PNs. Our findings reinforce the idea that distinct subtypes of glutamate receptors are activated in response to different patterns of activity at excitatory synapses. The results also raise the possibility that mGluR1alpha-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity may occur at excitatory inputs to BSNs.     

Glycinergic synaptic transmission to bullfrog retinal bipolar cells is input-specific

Glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) focally elicited at the dendrites and axon terminals were recorded from bipolar cells in the bullfrog retinal slice, using the whole-cell clamp technique. IPSCs driven by input from interplexiform cells at bipolar cell dendrites (ipc-IPSCs) had a much slower decay time constant (25.2 +/- 7.8 ms) than IPSCs driven by input from amacrine cells at bipolar cell axon terminals (ac-IPSCs) (14.7 +/- 5.5 ms). Furthermore, peak-scaled non-stationary noise analysis revealed that the weighted mean single-channel conductance of the glycine receptors underlying bipolar cell dendritic ipc-IPSCs (20.8 +/- 6.6 pS) was significantly larger than that of those underlying bipolar cell axon terminal ac-IPSCs (12.9 +/- 2.9 pS). These results demonstrate that glycinergic synaptic transmission with different properties at bipolar cell dendrites and axon terminals differentially mediates intraretinal centrofugal signal transfer from the inner retina to the outer retina provided by interplexiform cells and lateral inhibition offered by amacrine cells in the inner retina.