Discontinuing monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP pathway after one-year treatment: an observational longitudinal cohort study

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (mAbs anti-CGRP) pathway are effective and safe on migraine prevention. However, some drug agencies limited these treatments to one year due to their high costs. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of discontinuing mAbs anti-CGRP on monthly migraine days (MMDs) and disability in high-frequency episodic (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients.MethodsThis observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted at 10 Italian headache centres. Consecutive adult patients were followed-up for three months (F-UP1–3) after discontinuation of a one-year erenumab/galcanezumab treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in F-UP MMDs. Secondary endpoints included variation in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), monthly acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 scores. We also assessed from F-UP1 to 3 the ≥50% response rate, relapse rate to CM, and recurrence of Medication Overuse (MO).ResultsWe enrolled 154 patients (72.1% female, 48.2 ± 11.1 years, 107 CM, 47 HFEM); 91 were treated with erenumab, 63 with galcanezumab. From F-UP1 to F-UP3, MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 progressively increased but were still lower at F-UP3 than baseline (Friedman’s analysis of rank, p < .001). In the F-UP1–3 visits, ≥50% response rate frequency did not differ significantly between CM and HFEM patients. However, the median reduction in response rate at F-UP3 was higher in HFEM (− 47.7% [25th, − 79.5; 75th,-17.0]) than in CM patients (− 25.5% [25th, − 47.1; 75th, − 3.3]; Mann-Whitney U test; p = .032). Of the 84 baseline CM patients who had reverted to episodic migraine, 28 (33.3%) relapsed to CM at F-UP1, 35 (41.7%) at F-UP2, 39 (46.4%) at F-UP3. Of the 64 baseline patients suffering of medication overuse headache ceasing MO, 15 (18.3%) relapsed to MO at F-UP1, 26 (31.6%) at F-UP2, and 30 (42.3%, 11 missing data) at F-UP3. Lower MMDs, MAMI, NRS, and HIT-6 and higher response rate in the last month of therapy characterized patients with ≥50% response rate at F-UP1 and F-UP3 (Mann-Whitney U test; consistently p < .01).ConclusionMigraine frequency and disability gradually increased after mAbs anti-CGRP interruption. Most patients did not relapse to MO or CM despite the increase in MMDs. Our data suggest to reconsider mAbs anti-CGRP discontinuation.     

Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine with medication overuse: real-life effectiveness and predictors of response at 6 months

BackgroundIn daily practice, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) may be useful in chronic migraine (CM) with medication overuse (MO), but data is limited. We evaluated their effectiveness in a real-life clinical cohort.MethodsThis is a prospective study conducted in CM patients with and without medication overuse treated with monthly MAbs during 6 months (erenumab/galcanezumab). We collected headache characteristics, including acute medication intake, through an electronic diary. We compared patients (1) with and without MO at baseline, (2) with and without ongoing MO after treatment, defining MO resolution as < 10 or 15 days/month of acute medication intake, according to analgesic type, during the 6-month treatment.ResultsOf 139 CM patients completing 6-month treatment with anti-CGRP MAbs, 71.2% (99/139) had MO at baseline. After 6 months, patients with and without MO at baseline had significant and similar proportions of ≥50% reduction in migraine days/month (MO: 63.6% vs. non-MO: 57.5%, p = 0.500). 60.6% (60/99) no longer satisfied MO definition. Reduction in headache frequency compared to baseline occurred in both MO-ongoing and MO-resolution group, although those who stopped overusing had a greater improvement (headache days/month: − 13.4 ± 7.6 vs. -7.8 ± 7.2, p < 0.0001). No differences in MO resolution were observed according to the MAbs used. Baseline lower pain severity was associated with MO resolution (OR [95%]:0.236[0.054–0.975]; p = 0.049).ConclusionsIn real-life anti-CGRP MAbs are as effective in CM patients with MO as in patients without it and facilitate MO cessation. Reduction in headache frequency and acute medication days/month occurs regardless of whether patients stop overusing or not.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01328-1.     

Oxcarbazepine for trigeminal neuralgia may induce lower extremity weakness: A case report

BACKGROUND Although few studies have reported hyponatremia due to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in patients with epilepsy,no study has investigated cases of carbamazepine-or oxcarbazepine-induced hyponatremia or unsteady gait in patients with neuropathic pain.Herein,we report a case of oxcarbazepineinduced lower leg weakness in a patient with trigeminal neuralgia and summarize the diagnosis,treatment,and changes of clinical symptoms.CASE SUMMARY A 78-year-old male with a history of lumbar spinal stenosis was admitted to the hospital after he experienced lancinating pain around his right cheek,eyes,and lip,and was diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia at the right maxillary and mandibular branch.He was prescribed oxcarbazepine(600 mg/d),milnacipran(25 mg/d),and oxycodone/naloxone(20 mg/10 mg/d)for four years.Four years later,the patient experienced symptoms associated with spinal stenosis,including pain in the lower extremities and unsteady gait.His serum sodium level was 127 mmol/L.Assuming oxcarbazepine to be the cause of the hyponatremia,oxcarbazepine administration was put on hold and the patient was switched to topiramate.At subsequent visit,the patient’s serum sodium level had normalized to 143 mmol/L and his unsteady gait had improved.CONCLUSION Oxcarbazepine-induced hyponatremia may cause lower extremity weakness and unsteady gait,which should be differentiated from those caused by spinal stenosis.     

Galcanezumab effect on “whole pain burden” and multidimensional outcomes in migraine patients with previous unsuccessful treatments: a real-world experience

BackgroundClinical trials have demonstrated galcanezumab as safe and effective in migraine prevention. However, real-life data are still lacking and overlook the impact of galcanezumab on those different migraine facets strongly contributing to migraine burden. Herein we report the clinical experience from an Italian real-world setting using galcanezumab in patients with migraine experiencing previous unsuccessful preventive treatments.MethodsForty-three patients with migraine and failure of at least 3 migraine preventive medication classes received monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c. At the first administration and after 3 and 6 months, patients underwent extensive interviews to assess clinical parameters of disease severity. Furthermore, validated questionnaires were administered to explore migraine-related disability, impact, and quality of life as well as symptoms of depression or anxiety, pain catastrophizing, sleep quality and the ictal cutaneous allodynia.ResultsAfter the third and the sixth administration of monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c., headache attacks frequency reduced from 20.56 to 7.44 and 6.37 headache days per month, respectively. Moreover, a significant improvement in headache pain intensity (from 8.95 to 6.84 and 6.21) and duration (from 9.03 to 3.75 and 2.38) as well as in scores assessing migraine related disability and impact, depressive and anxious symptoms, and pain catastrophizing was observed. Furthermore, we demonstrated a significant reduction in the values of “whole pain burden”, a composite score derived from the product of the average of headache frequency, intensity, and duration in the last three months.ConclusionReal-world data support monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c. as a safe and effective preventive treatment in reducing headache frequency, intensity, and duration as well as comorbid depressive or anxious symptoms, pain catastrophizing and quality of life in both episodic and chronic migraine patients with previous unsuccessful preventive treatments. Furthermore, we demonstrated that monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c. is able to induce a significant improvement in the scores of “whole pain burden”. The latter is a reliable and easy-to-handle tool to be employed in clinical setting to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive drugs (in this case, galcanezumab) or when the decision of continuing the treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs is mandatory.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01436-6.     

Resumption of migraine preventive treatment with CGRP(-receptor) antibodies after a 3-month drug holiday: a real-world experience

BackgroundMigraine frequency increases after the cessation of successful preventive treatment with CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the course of migraine after treatment resumption.MethodsPatients with migraine, who started treatment with the same CGRP(-R) mAb after a three-month drug holiday were included in this analysis. We collected headache data at four prospective visits: 1) during the four weeks before the initial mAb treatment (baseline); 2) during the four weeks before the last mAb injection; 3) in weeks 13–16 of the drug holiday; 4) in weeks 9–12 after treatment restart. Outcomes were the changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), monthly days with acute medication use (AMD) and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores across the observation period.ResultsThis study included 39 patients (erenumab n = 16; galcanezumab/ fremanezumab n = 23). MMD decreased from 12.3 ± 6.3 at the end of the drug holiday to 7.8 ± 5.5 three months after treatment restart (p = 0.001). The improvement after treatment resumption was similar to the response in the initial treatment period (baseline: 12.3 ± 6.3 MMD vs. 7.5 ± 5.2 MMD before treatment interruption). MHD and AMD showed a significant improvement after treatment restart. HIT-6 scores decreased, indicating a diminished impact of headache on everyday life.ConclusionsReinitiation of treatment with CGRP(-R) mAbs after a drug holiday leads to a significant reduction of migraine frequency and medication use as well as improvement in quality of life.     

Complementary medicine use and costs in patients with breast cancer who experienced treatment-related side effects: A cross-sectional survey in Korea

ObjectivesPopulation-based information on the costs of complementary medicine for treatment-related side effects in patients with breast cancer is scarce. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and expenditure on complementary medicine in patients with breast cancer who experienced treatment-related side effects.Design and settingTwo datasets were analyzed: 1) a 2017 survey on direct and indirect costs for treatment-related side effects, which was completed by 100 patients with stage 0-IV breast cancer, and 2) a Korean representative cross-sectional survey (Patient Survey 2014) that examined the prevalence of integrative medicine in 41 patients with breast cancer.Main outcome measuresThe direct and indirect costs for treatment-related side effects.ResultsIn the first dataset, the mean total direct medical cost for complementary medicine was US$1,584 and the mean indirect cost was US$6,988 per patient per year. Some patients (6%) visited non-medical institutions to utilize complementary medicine and additionally spent US$460 per patient per year. Approximately one-third of participants reported a substantial-to-heavy financial burden for using complementary medicine. However, only 17% of patients got information about complementary medicine through their physician. In the second dataset, 49% of patients with breast cancer who were discharged from Korean Medicine hospitals in Patient Survey 2014 data indicated that integrative medicine had been used.ConclusionsDespite some complementary medicine could be reimbursed by National Health Insurance in Korea, a considerable number of patients reported an economic burden associated with their use of complementary medicine. Strategies for guiding patients to receive evidence-based and cost-effective complementary medicine are needed.     

亚胺培南/西司他丁致中枢神经系统不良反应的文献分析

目的 进一步了解亚胺培南/西司他丁中枢神经系统不良反应(ADR)的发生情况及危险因素,为临床合理用药提供参考.方法 检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库(Wanfang)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)及维普数据库(VIP)中亚胺培南/西司他丁致中枢神经系统ADR的病例报道,并进行统计分析.检索时间为自该药上市以来至...     

Blockade of CGRP receptors in the intracranial vasculature: a new target in the treatment of headache

In primary headaches, there is a clear association between the headache and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) but not with any of the other neuronal messengers. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of CGRP in the intracranial circulation and to elucidate a possible role for a specific CGRP receptor antagonist in the treatment of primary headaches. Acute treatment with a 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist (triptan) results in alleviation of the headache and normalization of the cranial venous CGRP levels, in part due to a presynaptic inhibitory effect on sensory nerves. The central role of CGRP in migraine and cluster headache pathophysiology has led to the search for small molecule CGRP antagonists with few cardiovascular side-effects. The initial pharmacological profile of such a group of compounds has recently been disclosed. One of these compounds has been found to be efficacious in the relief of acute attacks of migraine.     

European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention – 2022 update

BackgroundA previous European Headache Federation (EHF) guideline addressed the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway to prevent migraine. Since then, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence have expanded the evidence and knowledge for those treatments. Therefore, the EHF panel decided to provide an updated guideline on the use of those treatments.MethodsThe guideline was developed following the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The working group identified relevant questions, performed a systematic review and an analysis of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Where the GRADE approach was not applicable, expert opinion was provided.ResultsWe found moderate to high quality of evidence to recommend eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in individuals with episodic and chronic migraine. For several important clinical questions, we found not enough evidence to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance relied on experts’ opinion. Nevertheless, we provided updated suggestions regarding the long-term management of those treatments and their place with respect to the other migraine preventatives.ConclusionMonoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are recommended for migraine prevention as they are effective and safe also in the long-term.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x.     

Mania associated with ranitidine: a case report and review of literature

H2 receptor antagonists can be associated with central adverse drug reactions (ADRs), like confusion, delirium, hallucinations, slurred speech or headaches. We report here a ‘serious’ case of severe mania leading to hospitalization in a 42‐year‐old alcohol‐dependent man, 4 days after ranitidine introduction. Review of literature showed that this ‘very rare’ ADR occurs mainly in patients with predisposing factors: age, decrease in renal and/or hepatic function, polymedication, alcohol. Knowledge of this ADR can be particularly important for these drugs widely used as self‐medication.     

酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性期老年人慢性粒细胞白血病的疗效及安全性分析

目的 回顾性分析酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)老年患者的疗效及安全性.方法 收集2005年1月至2016年1月于华西医院血液内科就诊的发病年龄≥60岁且接受TKI治疗的慢性期CML老年患者共计52例作为研究对象.其中,33例患者的一线治疗方案选择伊马替尼(IM)治疗,2例患者一线治疗方案选择二代TKI尼洛替尼(NIL)治疗,其余17例患者接受IM治疗前经过干扰素治疗.对其治疗反应、总体生存(OS)、无事件生存(EFS)、伴随疾病情况及药物不良反应进行回顾性分析,总结TKI治疗老年CML的疗效及安全性.结果 ①随访结束时,所有患者累积完全血液学缓解(CHR)、主要细胞遗传学缓解(MCyR)、完全细胞遗传学缓解(CCyR)和主要分子学缓解(MMR)率分别为100.0％(52/52)、82.7％(43/52)、80.8％(42/52)和71.2％(37/52).所有患者1、5和10年OS率分别为100.0％、95.1％和75.3％,EFS率分别为92.3％、73.3％和51.4％.②25例患者诊断为CML时存在伴随疾病,所有52例患者查尔森合并症指数(CCI)评分均≤2分.32例CCI评分=0分与20例CCI评分＞0分的患者相比,累积CCyR、MCyR、MMR率,以及Ⅲ～Ⅳ级血液学与非血液学不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(x2 =0.948、0.525、0.021、0.288、0.519,P＞0.05).③50例接受IM治疗患者中,Ⅲ～Ⅳ级中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、贫血发生率分别为16.0％(8/50)、28.0％ (14/50)及18.0％(9/50),Ⅲ～Ⅳ级非血液学不良反应发生率为28.0％(14/50),5例(10.0％,5/50)患者因为IM不耐受而选择二代TKI治疗.结论 TKI对慢性期CML老年患者具有良好的疗效及安全性,轻微的伴随疾病不影响疾病治疗.