Der ileoanale Pouch als Rectumersatz

The ileoanal pouch procedure (IAPP) was the most remarkable breakthrough in the surgical therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in the last 20 years. The underlying disease is under control, the function preserved and the quality of life markedly improved. Alternative procedures (terminal ileostomy, ileorectal anastomosis) are only indicated in special cases. In the last 16 years we have operated on 662 patients (n = 493 UC; n = 169 FAP) with an ileoanal J-pouch, short rectal cuff, complete mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis. Normally there is a good function for UC and FAP patients after IAPP. Surgical experience, technical modifications concerning the pouch design and the pouch-anal anastomosis, and a differentiated indication lead to a further improvement of these complex procedures with consecutive reduction of complications. Specific complications concerned mainly the pouch-anal anastomosis (fistulas, abscesses, consecutive stenosis) and inflammation of the pouch mucosa (pouchitis). A multivariate analysis showed, that increasing experience of the specialized center is a significant factor reducing inflammatory problems at the anastomosis. The cumulative incidence of pouchitis was 29%. In general there is no problem in successful treatment. But patients with chronic pouchitis are a problematic group (6.2%). Chronic pouchitis is difficult to treat. It is likely that there exists an inflammation dysplasia carcinoma sequence for the ileal pouch mucosa, analogous to the colorectum. Recently we diagnosed the first case of a real ileum pouch carcinoma with associated epithelial dysplasias following chronic pouchitis. Therefore patients with chronic pouchitis must be followed up by endoscopy and random biopsies in a surveillance program. Patients with UC and FAP can gain the life quality of healthy controls, if postoperative complications can be avoided or treated successfully. For the further development of the procedure and the individual long-term success a qualified follow-up and therapy of complications is essential. Both can be carried out only by a specialized center.     

Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.

Between March 1989 and August 1990, we performed 21 stapled J pouch ileonal procedures (20 ulcerative colitis [UC], 1 familial polyposis [FP]) without an ileostomy in 19, of whom 13 were taking prednisone and eight underwent semi-emergent surgery for uncontrollable bleeding. During the same time, an additional four patients required a standard ileonal procedure. The results of anal manometry and clinical function were compared to 25 patients who had previously undergone mucosal stripping and a sutured J pouch ileoanal anastomoses with a temporary diverting ileostomy between October 1982 and August 1990. During this same time period, an additional 19 patients underwent an anti-peristaltic reversed J pouch and 18 an S pouch, for a total of 83 ileoanal procedures. The reversed J pouch had a lower stool frequency than a standard J pouch but had an unacceptable incidence of complications and problems with pouch emptying. The S pouch had a stool frequency similar to the standard J pouch but provided greater length in patients with a short mesentery. Stapled J pouch ileoanal patients had a better (p less than 0.02) maximum and sphincter resting pressure (46 +/- 11 versus 34 +/- 12 mmHg), fewer (p less than 0.05) night-time accidents (22% versus 68%), daytime (17% versus 55%) or night-time (28 versus 61%) spotting, or use of a protective pad at night (11% versus 42%) than nonstapled J pouch ileoanal patients. Stool frequency was similar in the two groups. All but one UC patient had residual disease at the anastomosis. Anal mucosa between the dentate line and stapled anastomosis was 1.8 +/- 1.3 cm (range, 0 to 3.5 cm). Complications in the nonstapled J pouch group included 4 pouches excised (2 for complications, 2 for excessive stool frequency), 1 pelvic abscess, 2 stenosis requiring dilation under anesthesia, 1 enterocutaneous fistula after ileostomy closure, 1 ileostomy site hernia, and 2 small bowel obstructions. Of the 65 patients who underwent ileostomy closure in the entire series, 8 (12%) developed a complication requiring surgical intervention. Complications in the stapled group included 1 anastomotic leak, 1 pouch leak, and 1 pelvic abscess. Patients were managed successfully with drainage (all 3) and diverting ileostomy (1). One patient developed stenosis requiring dilation under anesthesia. The stapled J pouch ileoanal anastomosis is a simpler, safer procedure with less tension than a standard handsewn J pouch but leaves a very small cuff of residual disease. It provides significantly better stool control and may obviate the need for an ileostomy with its complications.     

Results of the double stapling procedure in colorectal surgery

In this report we review our results with the double stapling technique (DST) in 162 patients with colorectal diseases in an attempt to identify some of the potential pitfalls of this new technique. Among these 162 patients, there were 125 patients with colorectal cancer, 25 with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC), 9 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 2 with adult Hirschsprung's disease, and 1 with sigmoid colon fistula. A total of 46 anastomoses (28 for rectal cancer, 13 for UC, 3 for FAP, and 2 for adult Hirschsprung's disease) were performed at or near the dentate line. Of these, 10 had protective diverting colostomy or ileostomy. The results showed that 6 patients with rectal cancer had anastomotic leakage (3.7%); however, 4 of the 6 patients had also received preoperative irradiation. All the leaks healed after the patients had undergone diverting colostomy, but 7 patients with rectal cancer suffered from neurogenic bladder postoperatively (4.3%). Wound infection occurred in 4 patients (2.5%), anastomotic bleeding in 3 (1.9%), and anal pain in 1 (0.6%), respectively. One patient with rectal cancer and multiple liver metastases died of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). These results thus suggest that the double stapling technique provides a safe anastomosis at or near the dentate line not only for rectal cancer but also for UC, FAP, and adult Hirschsprung's disease.     

应用吻合器手术治疗家族性腺瘤样息肉病21例分析

目的探讨3种吻合器在治疗家族性腺瘤样息肉病的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院2000年1月至2005年12月间采用吻合器手术治疗家族性腺瘤样息肉病21例的临床资料。结果21例病人均采用3种吻合器手术,行全结肠切除、直肠超低位前切除、回肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术,并预防性回肠造口。全组无手术死亡病人、无吻合口瘘、盆腔脓肿、吻合口狭窄等严重并发症发生。1例病人发生贮袋粘连,在直肠镜下分离治愈;2例吻合口附近发现息肉经内镜电灼切除。全组病人排便功能满意,排便次数控制在每天2～5次。结论采用3种吻合器进行结肠切除、直肠超低位前切除、回肠贮袋与肛管吻合术,并预防性回肠造口,手术安全、简捷省时、术后并发症较少,应作为首选手术方式,手术后应进行长期随访,及时发现和处理复发息肉。     

J pouch with ileoanal anastomosis

The physical inconvenience and adverse psychological impact of ileostomy on patients led surgeons to seek a more normal and acceptable alternative. This is a report of the Mayo Clinic experience with, and modifications of, the ileoanal reservoir procedure. The hospital charts of 188 patients who had a J-pouch construction were reviewed. The operative technique is described. There were no hospital deaths. In 10 patients the operation was a failure. Complications included pelvis sepsis (21 patients), anastomotic sinus (15), anastomotic stricture (22), small-bowel obstruction (43), peritonitis after ileostomy closure (10) and pouchitis (15). Careful patient selection for the procedure is important. Crohn's disease is a contraindication. Of the patients studied, 95% found life more acceptable with an ileoanal anastomosis than with a loop ileostomy.     

Ileoanal anastomosis with reservoirs: complications and long-term results.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of complications of ileoanal pouch anastomosis, their treatment and their influence on a successful outcome. DESIGN: A computerized database and chart review. SETTING: Three academic tertiary care health centres. PATIENTS: All 239 patients admitted for surgery between 1981 and 1994 with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatosis coli. INTERVENTIONS: Sphincter-saving total proctocolectomy and construction of either S-type of J-type ileoanal reservoir. OUTCOME MEASURES: Indications, early and late complications, incidence of pouch excision. RESULTS: Of the 239 patients, 228 (95.4%) were operated on for ulcerative colitis and 11 (4.6%) for familial polyposis coli. One patient in each group was found to have a carcinoma not previously diagnosed. Twenty-eight patients had poor results: in 17 (7.1%) the ileostomy was never closed or was re-established because of pelvic sepsis or complex fistulas, sclerosing cholangitis or severe diarrhea; 11 (4.6%) patients required excision of the pouch because of anal stenosis, perirectal abscess-fistula or rectovaginal fistula. Three patients died--of suicide, and complications of liver transplantation and HIV infection. Thus, 208 patients maintained a functioning pouch. The early complication rate (within 30 days of operation) was 57.7% (138 patients) and the late complication rate was 52.3% (125 patients). Pouchitis alone did not lead to failure or pouch excision. Emptying difficulties in 25 patients with anal stenosis were helped in 2 by resorting to intermittent catheterization. Patients with indeterminate colitis had a higher rate of anorectal septic complications, and all patients having Crohn's disease after pouch construction had complicated courses. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate associated with ileoanal pouch anastomosis continues to be relatively high despite increasing experience with this technique. Overall, however, a satisfactory outcome was obtained in 87% of patients.     

Laparoscope-Assisted Versus Conventional Restorative Proctocolectomy with Rectal Mucosectomy

To assess the advantages of a laparoscope-assisted proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis compared with conventional procedures, we retrospectively analyzed the results of the two procedures as follows: Eleven patients including five patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and six with ulcerative colitis (UC) underwent a laparoscope-assisted proctocolectomy and hand-sewn ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis at our department from June 1997 to November 1999. This laparoscope-assisted colectomy (LAC) group was then compared with a group of 13 patients who had undergone conventional ileal pouch anal anastomosis using a standard laparotomy from 1986 to 1997. The median operative time of the LAC group was 8 h 23 min, which was 81 min longer than that of the standard colectomy (SC) group. The number of days during which eating was prohibited were similar in the two groups but the median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LAC group (24.1 days). In the LAC group, the small incisions showed better cosmetic results and there was also a remarkable reduction in the degree of postoperative pain. In conclusion, a laparoscope-assisted proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis can be employed widely in patients with FAP and also in selected patients with UC. Received: April 17, 2000 / Accepted: September 26, 2000     

Absorption of bile acids after ileoanal anastomosis

Absorption of bile acids was investigated using 75Se-homotaurocholate (SeHCAT) in 27 patients with ileoanal anastomosis and J-pouch, 7 patients with conventional ileostomy and 9 non-operated patients with ulcerative colitis. Retention of SeHCAT at seven days was higher in non-operated patients than in patients with ileoanal anastomosis (P less than 0.001) or conventional ileostomy (P less 0.01). There was no difference in retention of SeHCAT between patients with ileoanal anastomosis or conventional ileostomy. Malabsorption of bile acids was not associated with changes in blood chemistry or faecal fat excretion. Patients with ileoanal anastomosis and low retention of SeHCAT had more severe villous atrophy of the pouch mucosa than those with high retention (P less than 0.05). In conclusion, both patients with ileoanal anastomosis and conventional ileostomy have impaired absorption of bile acids when compared with non-operated patients with ulcerative colitis. In patients with ileoanal anastomosis, impairment of bile acid absorption is related to villous atrophy of the pouch mucosa.     

The value of diverting loop ileostomy on the high-risk colon and rectal anastomosis

INTRODUCTION: The need for diverting loop ileostomies to protect high-risk anastomoses has been questioned recently by several authors. This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits and complications of diverting loop ileostomies in a high-risk anastomosis population. METHODS: Ninety-four consecutive patients undergoing diverting loop ileostomy were evaluated from a prospective database between 2003 and 2006. Criteria for diversion were: anastomosis less than 5 cm from the anal verge, previous pelvic radiation therapy, obstruction, and infection. Data regarding patient demographics, underlying pathology, anastomotic problems, and ileostomy-related problems were gathered. RESULTS: Indications for surgery were malignancy (n = 40), ulcerative colitis (n = 37), acute diverticulitis (n = 12), perirectal fistulas (n = 3), and familial polyposis (n = 2). There were 5 anastomotic complications. One required permanent stoma and 4 required delay in diverting ileostomy closure but no other intervention. Ileostomy-related problems were limited to minor stoma and pouch complaints requiring stoma nurse evaluation (n = 23), dehydration requiring outpatient (n = 8) or inpatient (n = 4) intravenous fluids, stricture at stoma closure site (n = 2), and bleeding at stoma closure site (n = 1). Four stoma site hernias (4.3%) have been identified to date. CONCLUSION: The use of diverting loop ileostomy in patients undergoing colon and rectal surgery with high-risk anastomoses is beneficial. Their selected use has resulted in a 1% anastomotic loss rate with an acceptably low rate of complications related to the ileostomy.     

Poor outcome of a defunctioning stoma after pouch construction for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis can have complications necessitating a later defunctioning ileostomy with uncertain outcome. This analysis was undertaken to assess the outcome in patients needing a later defunctioning ileostomy after pouch construction in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHOD: The notes of our series of 154 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were reviewed and 28 patients identified who needed a later defunctioning ileostomy to deal with complications. RESULTS: A later defunctioning ileostomy was necessary in 28 patients to deal with the following complications: sepsis in 11 patients (5 pouches failed), fistulas in 7 (5 pouches failed), poor function including ileoanal stenosis in 5 (all 5 failed), postoperative intraabdominal bleeding in 2 (both saved), pouchitis in 2 (1 excised) and small bowel obstruction in 1 (saved). 16 pouches were eventually excised or permanently defunctioned (59%). CONCLUSION: Complications necessitating a later defunctioning stoma after pouch construction carry a poor prognosis, especially when used for ileoanal stenosis and fistulae.     

Mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal pull-through technique and functional results in 23 consecutive patients

Mucosal proctectomy with ileoanal pull-through in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis provides a technique for the preservation of the anal sphincters and relatively normal mechanisms of continence. Five patients had straight ileoanal anastomosis while 18 had the construction of a J-pouch. A two-team approach was used for simultaneous abdominal and perineal procedures to facilitate a shortened operating time. A loop ileostomy was routinely used in the postoperative period and was closed an average of 4.5 months (range: 2-16 months) later without complication. Prolonged preoperative hospitalization was rarely necessary and outpatient steroid enema preparation was routinely used. There were no deaths. Nineteen patients with functioning pull-through procedures have been followed an average of 23 months (range: 3-42 months). Two other patients have not had ileostomy closure because of complications. The two remaining patients had intractable diarrhea and have since undergone conversion to a permanent ileostomy. The 19 patients are continent, having three to nine bowel movements each day. Nearly all wear a perineal sanitary pad because of rare, unpredictable leakage of small amounts of fluid, especially at night. Complications were significant in this group of patients. Intestinal obstruction was a frequent problem, occurring in 52 per cent of the entire series and necessitating reoperation in 22 per cent. Anal stricture was a problem in another five patients. A variety of other minor problems occurred and most were treated nonoperatively. In spite of moderate diarrhea and occasional leakage of stool, all patients with functioning pull-through procedures prefer their current status to life with an ileostomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

结肠J型贮袋在低位直肠癌吻合术32例中的应用

目的探讨结肠J型贮袋在低位直肠癌手术中的应用。方法对我科2001年~2004年实施的直肠癌结肠J型贮袋肛管(直肠)吻合术32例的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果全组无术中意外损伤及大出血病例。无死亡病例。发生吻合口狭窄1例。无吻合口漏及便秘。病人术后1年内排便状况满意。结论低位直肠癌行结肠J型贮袋肛管(直肠)吻合术具有操作方便、易于观察、容易推广等特点,有明显改善排便功能的作用,可显著提高病人术后的生活质量。     

The role of ileostomy in the prevention and treatment of complications of deep rectal anastomoses

The authors analyzed their data of the last three and a half years about patients with temporary loop ileostomy. We formed 18 ileostomies in patients with rectum carcinoma where the anastomosis was performed in the mid or lower rectum. Ten ileostomies were formed because of anastomotic leak, eight to protect the anastomosis, although there were no signs of insufficiency at the time of the intraoperative testing. Sixteen of the 18 patients had no complications. There were two complications in connection with ileostomies, these stomas were closed earlier than usual. Two other patients needed permanent stomas. Fourteen ileostomies were reversed without complications after 6-8 weeks. Two patients with local septic complications, following the closure, were treated conservatively. No reoperations were needed because of anal incontinence or anastomotic stenosis. We consider loop ileostomy safe with low morbidity, it can prevent diffuse peritonitis and/or a permanent stoma. Its routine use is recommended in patients with "ultra low" anastomoses and in cases where the intraoperative air test is positive.     

Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

A randomized controlled trial was performed to assess the role of loop ileostomy in totally stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Entry criteria included all patients who were not on corticosteroids in whom on-table testing revealed a watertight pouch with intact ileoanal anastomosis. Of 59 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy over 36 months, 45 were eligible and were randomized to loop ileostomy (n = 23) or no ileostomy (n = 22). The age and diagnosis of the groups were similar. There were no deaths; two ileoanal anastomotic leaks occurred, one in each group. Ileoanal stenosis occurred in five patients with and one without an ileostomy. The incidences of wound and pelvic sepsis, bowel obstruction and pouchitis were similar. Twelve patients (52 per cent) developed ileostomy-related complications. The median total hospital stay was 23 (range 13-75) days with ileostomy and 13 (range 7-119) days without (P < 0.001). This study indicates that there is a low risk of pelvic sepsis which is not increased by avoiding a protective ileostomy. Loop ileostomy was associated with a high incidence of complications.     

结直肠切除术的应用体会

目的：探讨全结肠直肠切除术在家族性腺瘤性鼻肉病（ＦＡＰ）、溃疡性结肠炎（ＵＣ）及结肠克隆病（ＣＣ）外科治疗中的应用。方法：对２２例ＦＡＰ,３例ＵＣ及２例ＣＣ病人施行全结肠直肠切除术,其中回肠贮袋肛管吻合（ＩＰＡＡ）２２例、回肠造口５例。在ＩＰＡＡ中,Ｊ型贮袋３例,Ｈ型贮袋２例,Ｓ型贮袋１７例,就手术适应证、手术操作、术后处理等进行讨论。结果：回肠造口中以加部分倒置者效果较好,ＩＰＡＡ术后排便功能较     

Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J‐pouch really necessary?

Introduction Colonic J‐pouch with coloanal anastomosis has gained popularity in the surgical treatment of middle and lower rectal pathologies. If a diverting ileostomy is performed, a pouchogram is frequently performed prior to ileostomy closure. The aim of this study was to assess the routine use of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in patients with colonic J pouch‐anal anastomosis. Methods All patients who underwent a colonic J pouch‐anal anastomosis between 1990 and 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with temporary loop ileostomy who had pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure were included. Pouchogram results were compared to the patient's post ileostomy closure clinical outcome. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of pouchogram were assessed. Results Eighty‐four patients had a pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure. Radiological abnormalities were evident in 6 patients, including 4 strictures, 1 pouch‐vaginal fistula and 1 leak. Of these findings, 4 were false positives (3 strictures and 1 leak) and two were true positives (1 stricture and 1 pouch‐vaginal fistula). The actual rate of pouch complications was 9.5% (8 complications) including 3 anastomotic leaks, all with normal pouchogram, 3 strictures requiring dilatation under anaesthesia, only one detected by pouchogram, and 2 pouch‐vaginal fistulas, only one diagnosed by pouchogram. The sensitivity and specificity of pouchogram, respectively, was 0 and 98% for anastomotic leak, 33 and 96% for stricture, and 50 and 100% for pouch‐vaginal fistula. Overall, pouchogram changed the management in only 1 of 84 patients. Conclusion Pouchogram has a low sensitivity in predicting complications following ileostomy closure in patients after colonic J‐pouch anal anastomosis and rarely changes the management of these patients. The use of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure may be unnecessary and should be reserved in cases of clinical suspicion of complications.     

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Reoperation for pouch-related complications.

The aim was to assess the value of reoperative surgery for pouch-related complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Between January 1981 and August 1989, 114 of 982 IPAA patients (12%) seen at the Mayo Clinic had complications directly related to IPAA that required reoperation. Among the 114 patients, the complications prevented initial ileostomy closure in 33 patients (25%), occurred after ileostomy closure in 68 patients (60%), and delayed ileostomy closure in the remaining patients. The salvage procedures performed included anal dilatation under anesthesia for anastomotic strictures, placement of setons and/or fistulotomy for perianal fistulae, unroofing of anastomotic sinuses, simple drainage and antibiotics for perianal abscesses, abdominal exploration with drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses with or without establishment of ileostomy, and complete or partial reconstruction of the reservoir for patients with inadequate emptying. None of the reoperated patients died. Reoperation led to restoration of pouch function in two thirds of patients and, of these, 70% had an excellent clinical outcome. However approximately 20% of the 114 pouches required excision. Excision was common, especially among patients who had pelvic sepsis. Salvage procedures for pouch-specific complications can be done safely and will restore pouch function in two thirds of patients. Complications after reoperation, however, may ultimately lead to loss of the reservoir in one in five patients.     

Anorectal manometry and ileo-anal anastomosis]

Seventeen patients (12 ulcerative colitis, 5 familial adenomatous polyposis) underwent proctocolectomy and ileal J pouch anastomosis. Anal manometry with determination of maximum tolerable volume and a liquid continence test were perform before ileo-anal anastomosis, before closure of the loop ileostomy and 12 months after closure of the loop ileostomy. All patients were continent during the daytime less 12 months after proctocolectomy. The mean stool frequency was 5 stools per day in our 17 patients. A significant increase in maximum tolerable volume and in the liquid continence test was observed during the first year after closure of the ileostomy. Anal manometry is unnecessary after ileoanal anastomosis, but preoperatively, this test is able to exclude some patients with low anal pressure.     

Risk Factors for Ileoanal J Pouch-Related Septic Complications in Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between pre- and perioperative factors and pouch-related septic complications (PRSC) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with UC and FAP, IPAA is the surgical therapy of choice, but in some patients the outcome is compromised by PRSC. METHODS: A total of 706 consecutive patients (494 UC, 212 FAP) were assessed in a study aimed at identifying subgroups of patients who were at high risk for PRSC. The rate of PRSC was analyzed as a time-dependent function (Kaplan-Meier estimation). Patients with UC and FAP were stratified separately according to associated factors (age, sex, surgeon's experience, temporary ileostomy, colectomy before IPAA, anastomotic tension, and several factors specific for UC). RESULTS: In all, 131 (19.2%) patients had PRSC (23.4% UC, 9.4% FAP). In patients with UC, the estimated 1-year PRSC rate was 15.6% and the estimated 3-year PRSC rate was 24.2%. In patients with FAP, the estimated 1-year and 3-year PRSC rates were 9.2%. The difference between the estimated rates of PRSC was significant (P <.001). In the univariate analysis, patients with UC younger than 50 years, with severe proctitis, with preoperative hemoglobin levels less than 10 g/L, or receiving corticoid medication had a significantly higher risk for PRSC (P =.039, P =.037, P =.047, P =.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with UC receiving a systemic prednisolone-equivalent corticoid medication of more than 40 mg/day had a significantly greater risk of developing pouch-related complications than patients with UC receiving 1 to 40 mg/day and patients with UC who were not receiving corticoid medication (RR: 3.78, 2.25, 1, respectively, P <.001). Patients with FAP proved to have a significantly higher risk for PRSC in the univariate and multivariate analyses if anastomotic tension had occurred (RR 3.60, P =.0086). CONCLUSIONS: Pouch-related septic complications occur as late complications and should therefore be considered in regular, specific long-term follow-up examinations. The authors identified significant risk factors for PRSC specific to patients with UC and FAP; these must be considered for each individual surgical strategy.     

Experiences with PPH gun stapled ileo or coloanal anastomoses after ultralow rectal resections and proctocolectomies with J pouch reconstructions

A new method of stapled ileo and coloanal anastomosis with PPH gun (Johnson and Johnson USA) is presented. On 47 totalcolectomised FAP and UC patients and 9 low rectal benign or clinically T1 or T2N0 rectal tumor resection there was only 5 radiologically proven anastomotic leakadge without serious septic complications. The anal sphincter function after 6 month of the ileoanal anastomosis remained good in 33/39 and acceptable in 6 cases, if the sphincter function was intact praeoperatively. There was no worthening of the moderate praeoperatively observed insufficiency. After the ultra low rectal resections all patients kept the normal anal shpincter function. The procedure seems to be as good as the double stapler method, but there remained no remnant mucosal ring between the anastomsois and the dentate line. An additional advantige of the method, that only one stapler was consumed per patient compared to the two one at the double stapler technic.