PSA、PSAD和PSAT对前列腺癌诊断的比较

目的　比较前列腺移行带特异性抗原密度（PSAT）与前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）及前列腺特异性抗原密度（PSAD）在前列腺癌诊断中的意义。方法　对78例PSA4～20ng/ml的患者行前列腺穿刺活检后比较PSA、PSAD和PSAT指标。结果　78例中,病理诊断为前列腺癌(PCa)32例,良性前列腺增生(BPH)46例,二者PSA平均值分别为(14.32±1.46)ng/ml、(13.89±1.52)ng/ml,二者相比差别无显著性意义(P>0.05);PSAD平均值分别为0.43±0.14、0.36±0.17,二者相比差别有显著性意义(P<0.05);PSAT平均值分别为0.75±0.19、0.31±0.06,二者相比差别有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论　PSAD和PSAT对预测PSA<20ng/ml的患者是否患前列腺癌有较大帮助,特别是PSAT更为准确。     

PSAD在PSA 4～10ng患者前列腺癌诊断中的价值

目的探讨前列腺特异性抗原密度（PSAD）在前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）值介于4～10ng之间患者前列腺腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析183例血清PSA值介于4～10ng之间疑似前列腺癌患者的临床资料,所有患者均经直肠B超测得前列腺体积后再行经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺术,通过接受者工作特征曲线分析法评价PSAD在预测诊断前列腺癌中的应用价值。结果 183例患者中36例经直肠超声下前列腺活检的患者被诊断为前列腺癌,占19.7%。良性前列腺增生组与前列腺癌患者之间,PSA（0.681 5）与PSAD（0.721 4）的曲线下方面积比较相似,而游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值（f/tPSA）的曲线下面积只有0.318 2,相比PSA,PSAD值将是一个更好的预测前列腺癌的指标。结论 PSAD对于PSA值介于4～10ng/mL的中国患者是一项更好的预测前列腺癌的指标。     

（F/T）/PSAD在血清PSA〈4ng/mL前列腺癌诊断中的应用

目的探讨游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比/前列腺特异性抗原密度[（F/T）/PSAD]在前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）小于4 ng/mL的前列腺癌诊断中的意义。方法回顾分析血清PSA〈4 ng/mL的17例前列腺癌患者及同期血清PSA〈4 ng/mL的前列腺增生患者31例的临床资料,分析FPSA/TPSA、PSAD、（F/T）/PSAD值对PSA正常范围前列腺癌的诊断效率。结果前列腺癌组与前列腺增生组比较,FPSA/TPSA、PSAD、（F/T）/PSAD值差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,在敏感性为90%的前提下,（F/T）/PSAD特异性最高。结论在保持较高敏感性的前提下,应用（F/T）/PSAD可提高血清PSA正常范围内前列腺癌诊断特异性,提高早期前列腺癌的诊断率。     

血清PSA含量及前列腺PSA密度与经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检诊断前列腺癌的关系

目的探讨经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术前列腺癌检出率与血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及血清前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)的关系。方法对134例患者行经直肠超声引导下前列腺5区13针系统穿刺活检。根据PSA水平分为PSA≤4ng/ml组(7例)、4ng/mlPSA15ng/ml组(48例)及PSA≥15ng/ml组(79例)。测量并计算前列腺体积(PV)及PSAD,分析前列腺癌检出率及不同PSA、PSAD水平下对前列腺癌的诊断效能。比较前列腺癌与非前列腺癌患者PSA、PV及PSAD的差异。结果前列腺癌总检出率为50.75%(68/134),前列腺患者共68例(前列腺癌组),非前列腺癌患者共66例(非前列腺啊组)。PSA≤4ng/ml、4ng/mlPSA≤15ng/ml及PSA15ng/ml组前列腺癌检出率分别为14.29%(1/7)、20.83%(10/48)及72.15%(57/79),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。PSA≥4ng/ml时前列腺癌检出率随着PSA值的增高而上升。134例患者PSAD值为(1.09±1.72)ng/(ml·cm3),以PSAD≥0.19ng/(ml·cm3)为截点诊断前列腺癌的敏感度为95.59%(65/68),特异度为51.52%(34/66),阳性预测值67.01%(65/97),阴性预测值为32.99%(32/97)。4ng/mlPSA≤15ng/ml组中,以PSAD≥0.19ng/(ml.cm3)为截点诊断前列腺癌的敏感度为80.00%(8/10),特异度为71.05%(27/38),阳性预测值为42.11%(8/19),阴性预测值为57.89%(11/19)。前列腺癌组PSA及PSAD值均高于非前列腺癌组(P均0.05),PV小于非前列腺癌组(P0.05)。4ng/mlPSA≤15ng/ml组中,前列腺癌与非前列腺癌患者PSA及PV差异均无统计学意义(P均0.05),前列腺癌患者PSAD高于非前列腺癌患者(P0.05)。结论血清PSA及PSAD均与前列腺穿刺活检前列腺癌检出率有关,PSA15ng/ml应行穿刺活检,PSAD对4ng/mlPSA≤15ng/ml的患者是否应行穿刺活检具有指导意义。     

f/t PSA比值、PSA密度、PSA移行带密度在tPSA灰区前列腺偶发癌诊断中的意义

【摘要】 目的： 探讨血清f/t PSA比值、PSA密度、PSA移行带密度在tPSA位于灰区时前列腺癌诊断中的意义。方法： tPSA位于4～10ng/ml的前列腺增生患者112例,术前经前列腺穿刺活检均证实为前列腺增生,行TURP术后病理证实21例为前列腺偶发癌患者。回顾性分析该21例前列腺偶发癌患者和其余前列腺增生患者间的血清f/t PSA比值、PSA密度、PSA移行带密度,并进行统计学分析,以了解其在tPSA灰区前列腺偶发癌诊断中的意义。结果：前列腺偶发癌组和BPH组血清f/t PSA比值分别为0.13±0.03、0.21±0.04;PSAD分别为0.20±0.05 ng/ml2 、0.12±0.04 ng/ml2;PSATZ分别为0.38±0.06 ng/ml2 、 0.21±0.05 ng/ml2;两组在以上三个检测指标上差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。以0.15 ng/ml2为截断点则PSAD 灵敏性为76.115%,特异性为69.146%;以0.35 ng/ml2为截断点则PSATZ 灵敏性为60.642%,特异性为93.943%。结论：f/t PSA比值、PSAD、PSATZ对前列腺偶发癌的诊断具有重要价值,其中尤以PSATZ更具预测价值。     

血清PSA、PSAD和PSAT在前列腺穿刺活检中的意义

目的探讨血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)和前列腺移行带特异性抗原密度(PSAT)在前列腺穿刺活检中的意义。方法对192例患者行前列腺穿刺活检,其中PSA≥4ng/ml者184例,PSA<4ng/ml且直肠指诊及经直肠B超有阳性发现者8例。对PSA、PSAD和PSAT与前列腺穿刺活检的关系进行分析。结果192例患者中经前列腺穿刺诊断为前列腺癌(PCa)100例,活检阳性率52.1%,其中8例PSA<4ng/ml者中,活检结果为前列腺横纹肌肉瘤1例,良性前列腺增生7例;93例PSA>20ng/ml者中80例为PCa,活检阳性率86.0%;91例PSA4~20ng/ml者中19例为PCa,活检阳性率20.9%。血清PSA4~20ng/ml患者,PSAD>0.10或PSAT>0.10时,敏感性均为100%,特异性为11.1%或4.2%,阳性预测值为22.9%或21.6%,可避免8.8%(8/91)或3.3%(3/91)阴性穿刺结果。血清PSA4~20ng/ml时,前列腺穿刺阳性组和阴性组PSA分别为(13.2±4.7)和(11.4±4.6)ng/ml(P>0.05);PSAD分别为0.36±0.18和0.19±0.09(P=0.001);PSAT分别为0.67±0.36和0.32±0.18(P=0.000)。血清PSA、PSAD和PSAT的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.613、0.810和0.833,PSAD和PSAT的ROC曲线下面积与PSA比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论PSA>20ng/ml时应做前列腺穿刺活检;PSA4~20ng/ml时,PSAD和PSAT对预测患者是否行前列腺穿刺活检有较大帮助。     

PSA密度在血清PSA〈10ng／ml时的鉴别诊断意义

对14例血清前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）值＞10ng／ml的良性前列腺增生症（BPH）患者（BPH组）及12例前列腺癌（PC）患者（PC组）进行了术前PSA及前列腺特异性抗原密度（DPSA）测定。结果BPH织PSA值为29.61±15．89ng／ml，DPSA值为0．60±0．36；PC组PSA值为85．89±53．76ng／ml，DPSA值为1．93±1．31，两组间PSA及DPSA。均有统计学差异（P＜0．002）。认为当血清PSA力10ng／ml时．PSA几乎不能区分BPH和PC，而DPSA以0．7为标准值时，其诊断价值则明显优于PSA。同时分析厂造成BPH者PSA值＞10ng／ml的可能原因。     

超声引导下经直肠系统性12＋1针前列腺穿刺活检术

目的探讨超声引导下经直肠系统性12＋1针前列腺穿刺活检术诊断前列腺癌的临床价值。方法回顾性分析816例经直肠前列腺系统性12＋1针穿刺活检的可疑前列腺癌患者。其中PSA＜4ng／ml、直肠指诊发现结节者66例;PSA介于4～10ng／ml、f／tPSA值异常、PSAD值异常者190例;PSA〉10ng／ml、任何f／tPSA、PSAD值者560例。结果816例患者中活检病理确诊为前列腺癌者358例,总阳性率为43．9％（358／816）。其中位于前列腺尖部阳性者235例,占确诊病例总数的65．6％（235／358）。术后发热9例（1．0％,9／816）,并发血尿49例（6．0％,49／816）。几乎所有患者皆有短时大便带血。无其他严重并发症发生。结论超声引导下经直肠系统性前列腺12＋1针穿刺活检术定位准确,创伤较小,并发症较少。可以随机增加穿刺点,利于提高前列腺癌检出率。     

外周血和组织炎性细胞在鉴别PSA4～10ng/ml的前列腺癌和前列腺增生中的临床意义

目的:评价外周血和前列腺组织炎性细胞在鉴别前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)4～10 ng/ml的前列腺癌(PCa)和良性前列腺增生(BPH)中的临床意义。方法:回顾性分析我院2013年10月～2018年10月PSA水平4～10 ng/ml的PCa和BPH患者共45例,其中PCa组患者20例,BPH组患者25例。PCa组患者行前列腺癌根治术后病理确诊,BPH组患者行耻骨上经膀胱前列腺摘除术或经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)后病理确诊。所有患者在行前列腺穿刺活检术前检测血常规,记录患者外周血中WBC、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数,分析外周血淋巴细胞与单核细胞比率(LMR)、中性粒细胞与单核细胞比率(NMR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)等。同时收集患者术后病理石蜡切片,采用免疫组织化学(IHC)染色法检测前列腺组织中炎性细胞表达情况。结果:PCa组和BPH组患者外周血白细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数等指标比较差异无统计学意义。PCa组单核细胞计数明显低于BPH组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组LMR、NMR和NLR值比较差异无统计学意义。两组淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞表达比较差异无统计学意义,但BPH组单核细胞标志物CD14表达高于PCa组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:检测外周血和组织中单核细胞计数有助于诊断PSA浓度4～10 ng/ml的PCa患者。     

急诊经尿道前列腺电切术的临床应用

目的探讨急诊经尿道前列腺电切术（transurethral resection of prostatic,TURP）在治疗有急诊手术指征的前列腺增生（benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH）中的应用。方法2000年1月～2007年12月我院急诊TURP治疗BPH37例,术前给予降压、降糖等治疗,合并膀胱结石者同时碎石。结果无输血、手术死亡、大出血及经尿道电切综合征等发生。术中出血量100～400 ml,平均180 ml。35例术后病理证实为前列腺增生,2例为C期前列腺癌,进一步行双侧睾丸切除术及间断雄激素阻断治疗,随访12个月,排尿通畅,前列腺特异性抗原0～4 ng/ml。拔出尿管后均排尿通畅。3例术后1～3个月出现尿道狭窄,经定期尿道扩张3个月后治愈。37例随访3～24个月,平均9个月,术前后最大尿流率[（8.2±3.3）ml/s vs（19.3±3.1）ml/s,t=-5.435,P=0.000],IPSS评分[（22.5±5.1）分vs（5.3±1.2）分,t=7.136,P=0.000],QOL评分[（4.5±1.1）分vs（2.0±0.7）分,t=2.494,P=0.000]均有统计学差异。结论急诊TURP治疗有急诊手术指征的BPH,效果满意。但急诊TURP治疗BPH,为一种非常规的治疗方法,麻醉与手术风险较大,要求成熟的有经验的医师操作,并注意前列腺偶发癌的可能。     

前列腺特异性抗原密度的测定在诊断前列腺癌中的价值

对１０例非转移性前列腺癌和２０例前列腺增生的前列腺特异性抗原密度（ＰＳＡＤ）进行研究。前列腺癌平均ＰＳＡＤ值为０．７１１，而前列腺增生为０．０７５；两者有极显著性差异（Ｐ＜０．００１）。９例ＰＳＡＤ＞０．２者，８例为前列腺癌。１６例ＰＳＡＤ＜０．１者，无１例前列腺癌。８例前列腺癌患者中有３例前列腺特异性抗原（ＰＳＡ）＜１０ｎｇ／ｍｌ，１例＜２．８ｎｇ／ｍｌ。１６例前列腺增生患者中７例ＰＳＡ＞２．８ｎｇ／ｍｌ，３例＞１０ｎｇ／ｍｌ。表明血清ＰＳＡ轻中度增高或正常时，ＰＳＡＤ可作为前列腺癌早期筛选诊断的有效指标之一。     

Prostate specific antigen density for discriminating prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia in the gray zone of prostate-specific antigen.

Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is currently the best blood marker for prostate cancer. However, low specificity for detection of prostate cancer, especially in the gray zone of PSA, is a problem. We evaluated the clinical significance of PSA density (PSAD) in gray zone PSA cases with conversion of serum PSA to a Stanford reference value. In a series of histologically confirmed 63 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients and 234 prostate cancer patients, 36 BPH patients and 25 prostate cancer patients had gray zone PSA levels. Serum PSA was measured with the Markit-F or Markit-M PA assay. All data were converted to Stanford reference values. We used transabdominal ultrasound to determine prostate volume. PSAD was determined as the serum PSA/prostate volume ratio. The mean PSA values for BPH and prostate cancer were 6.42 +/- 1.80 and 7.80 +/- 2.15 ng/ml (p = 0.0116), respectively, and prostate volume was 33.4 +/- 14.1 ml and 17.1 +/- 8.2 ml, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean PSAD for prostate cancer was 0.572 +/- 0.363 while that for BPH was 0.218 +/- 0.085 (p = 0.0001). Cut-off values with sensitivity > 90% were 0.218 for PSAD and 30 ml for prostate volume. At these cut-off values, specificity reached 56% for each marker. In discriminating prostate cancer from BPH in the gray zone of PSA, PSAD demonstrated better performance than PSA.     

Utility of Volume Adjusted Prostate Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Arab Men

Background: This study was undertaken to assess the utility of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) in discriminating between benign and malignant prostate disease in the Kuwaiti Arab population.Methods: A total of 100 consecutive patients suspected of having prostate cancer because of serum PSA > 4 ng/ml, or detection of a prostatic nodule on rectal examination were further investigated by determination of PSAD, TRUS of prostate, sexant prostatic biopsy and histological analysis to establish the correct diagnosis. Other diagnostic measures included the determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity and specificity. Results: Of the 100 prostate biopsies that were performed, 33 cases were confirmed to be prostate cancer and 67 were described as benign lesions comprising benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with or without prostatitis. The age range for patients with prostate cancer was 42–90 years, and 52–90 years for those without prostate cancer. The mean prostate volume was 58.82 cc (range 9–177 cc) and 62.60 cc (range 15–140 cc), the mean PSA value was 36.65 ng/ml (range 5.8–200 ng/ml) and 16.49 ng/ml (range 1.4–46.0 ng/ml), while the mean PSAD was 0.92 (range 0.046–5.714) and 0.452 (range 0.034–2.294) for patients with prostate cancer and patients without prostate cancer respectively. Patients with PSA less than 4 ng/ml (3 cases) all had benign prostate lesions, and 7 cases with PSA more than 50 ng/ml all had prostate cancer and were excluded because values above 50 ng/ml have close to 100% specificity for prostate cancer. Further analysis was done on the remaining 90 cases which were patients with a PSA between 4 and 50 ng/ml. The discriminating power of serum PSA for detecting prostate cancer as estimated by the area under ROC was 0.686 while that for PSAD was 0.732. The maximum likelihood for a positive PSA was at a PSAD cut-off point of 0.32. For the PSA cut-off point of l0 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 80%, and specificity was 42.2%. For the PSAD cut-off point of 0.32, the sensitivity was 58% and the specificity 76.6%. Conclusions: Determination of PSAD is not a useful adjunct to serum PSA values in the range of 10–50 ng/ ml in our population. PSAD value less than 0.32 with PSA less than l0 ng/ml strongly suggests benign disease.     

Utilidad del cociente psa-l/psa-t y la dpsa para la discriminación entre hipertrofia benigna de próstata y cáncer de próstata

objectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio (f/tPSA) and PSA density (PSAD) for prostate cancer detection in patients with intermediate tPSA levels (4-10 ng/ml). To establish a cutoff to discriminate between benign prostatic disease (BPH) and prostate cancer (CaP), avoiding unnecessary biopsiesMethodsThis prospective study included 136 men, aged between 54 and 85 (mean 70,6) years old. Urinary tract symptoms were present in these patients. Serum samples were obtained to measure tPSA, fPSA, and f/tPSA; digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound eight-sector biopsies were performed. Prostate volume was measured and PSAD calculated. The pathologic study, carried out in 113 patients, showed 82 with BPH and 31 with prostate cancer in various stagesResultsThere were no significant differences between patients with BPH and CaP when comparing tPSA, fPSA, f/tPSA or digital rectal examination. PSAD and prostate volume were significantly different in patients with BPH and CaP. With a sensitivity of 94% (78,5-99), the f/tPSA cutoff was 0,28 with a 11% (5,2-19,8) specificity. With a sensitivity of 96,2% (80,3-99,4) cutoff for PSAD was 0,109 and specificity 25% (15,5-36,6)ConclusionsIn patients whose tPSA level is between 4 and 10 ng/ml, f/tPSA has no advantages over tPSA measurement for early detection of prostate cancer. DPSA can improve specificities, without compromising the detection of CaP     

PSA密度在PSA 2.5～10.0 ng/mL和10.1～20.0 ng/mL患者前列腺癌诊断价值的多中心研究

目的探讨前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值位于2.5~10 ng/m L和10.1~20.0 ng/m L患者前列腺癌诊断的效能。方法回顾性分析广州地区两家医院中PSA在2.5~20.0 ng/m L之间,行经直肠前列腺体积测量并行前列腺穿刺的461名患者临床资料,入选者分为PSA 2.5~10.0 ng/m L和PSA10.1~20.0 ng/m L两组,通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析法评价PSAD与PSA在预测前列腺癌的诊断效力。结果 PSA 2.5~10.0 ng/m L和PSA 10.1~20.0 ng/ml两组的曲线下面积比较,PSAD均高于PSA。在PSA 2.5~10.0 ng/m L组,PSAD预测前列腺癌的最佳临界点为0.15 ng·m L~(-1)·m L~(-1),敏感性和特异性分别为64.4%和64.6%;在PSA10.1~20.0 ng/m L组,PSAD预测前列腺癌的最佳临界点为0.33 ng·m L~(-1)·m L~(-1),敏感性和特异性分别为60.3%和82.7%。结论对于PSA2.5~10.0 ng/m L和10.1~20.0 ng/m L的中国男性,PSAD是一种更优的前列腺癌预测指标。     

游离前列腺特异抗原百分率检测前列腺癌的临床观察

目的 评价游离前列腺特异抗原（ＰＳＡ）百分率（Ｆ／Ｔ百分率）检测前列腺癌的临床价值。方法 用免疫放射法测定１１７例血清游离ＰＳＡ（Ｆ－ＰＳＡ）、总ＰＳＡ（Ｔ－ＰＳＡ）值,并计算游离ＰＳＡ所占百分率（Ｆ／Ｔ百分率）值;其中前列腺癌３１例,前列腺肥大８６例。结果 Ｆ／Ｔ百分率值在前列腺癌组明显低于前列腺肥大组（Ｐ〈０．０１）;若总ＰＳＡ限定于４￣１０ｎｇ／ｍｌ范围内,应用Ｆ／Ｔ百分率值可区别前列腺癌与     

Predictive value of prostate specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal findings or stage A prostate cancer

We compared the usefulness of PSA and PSA density (PSAD) in diagnosing prostate cancer in 102 men who had a PSA value higher than 4.0 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination and who had undergone transrectal ultrasonography-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate between August 1996 and October 1999. In addition, for a group of 53 patients who underwent retropubic simple prostatectomy, PSA, PSAD and PSA transition zone (PSA-TZ) examination results for those with stage A prostate cancer were compared with the results for those with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Of the former 102 men, 20 (19.6%) had prostate cancer. There was no significant difference in mean PSA level between patients with negative and those with positive biopsy results (mean 9.3 and 11.8, respectively, p = 0.295), but the mean PSAD of patients with positive biopsy results was significantly higher than that of those with negative results (mean 0.55 and 0.29, respectively, p = 0.0007). Of the 53 men who underwent retropubic simple prostatectomy, 10 (18.9%) were diagnosed with stage A prostate cancer. There was no significant difference in mean PSA, PSAD and PSA-TZ examination results between patients with BPH and those with stage A prostate cancer. For all 102 patients and for 71 patients with PSA levels of 4.1-10.0 ng/ml, a PSAD cutoff value of 0.1 reduced the number of biopsies 15.7% (16 of 102 cases), and 22.5% (16 of 71 cases), respectively. These results suggest that by measurement of PSAD some patients with benign disease could be spared a biopsy which would have been performed based on PSA results alone.     

PSA、PSAD和PSAT在前列腺穿刺活检中的价值

目的 研究血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及其密度(PSAD)和移行带密度(PSAT)在前列腺穿刺活检中的价值.方法 选取本院2014年5月至2015年5月收治的150例患者进行前列腺穿刺活检,分析并比较PSA、PSAD、PSAT在前列腺穿刺活检中的差异及其在确诊疾病方面的价值.结果 在前列腺穿刺活检的150例中发现PSA＜4 ng/mL有8例,4 ng/mL≤PSA≤20 ng/mL有66例,PSA ＞20 ng/mL有76例.其中在PSA＜4 ng/mL的8例中,活检结果良性前列腺增生6例,前列腺小细胞癌1例,前列腺横纹肌肉瘤1例.在4 ng/mL≤PSA≤20 ng/mL的66例中,活检结果诊断为前列腺癌增生患者54例,活检阳性率为81.8％,PSA平均值为(13.98±1.51) ng/mL,PSAD平均值为(0.32±0.18);PSAT平均值为(0.35±0.18);活检前列腺癌12例,活检阳性率为19.2％,PSA平均值为(14.29±1.48) ng/mL,PSAD平均值为(0.42±0.15),PSAT平均值为(0.82±0.15);将其分为良性前列腺增生组和前列腺癌组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).当PSAD ＞0.13或PSAT＞ 0.15时,前列腺癌的敏感性分别为92.86％和96.94％.在PSA＞ 20 ng/mL的76例中,前列腺癌有68例,活检阳性率89.47％.结论 在4 ng/mL≤PSA≤20 ng/mL时,PSAD和PSAT对前列腺增生和前列腺癌的鉴别诊断具有重要意义,其中又以PSAT更为准确;PSA＞ 20ng/mL时,应高度怀疑前列腺癌,及时确诊治疗.