"Atopy patch tests" in the diagnosis of delayed food hypersensitivity

The prevalence of atopic diseases is increasing worldwide. Food allergies are the earliest manifestation of atopy. Atopic eczema affects about 18% of infants in the first 2 years of life and the main cause is allergy to multiple foods. A strong association has been shown between atopic eczema and IgE mediated allergy to milk, egg or peanut, but more than two-thirds of patients intolerant to food proteins have no evidence of IgE sensitization to the relevant food protein. Recently, patch testing with proteins has been found to be helpful in diagnosing food allergy in cases where skin prick tests and estimation of specific antibodies have failed. The methodology of atopy patch test (APT) is unstandardized, and contradictory results have been reported. In contrast to the more standardized APT methodology with aeroallergens, the sensitivities and specificities of food allergens can easily be estimated with food challenge tests. With multiallergic children adding of APTs to the skin prick tests and specific antibody estimation tests give more information for planning a wide enough elimination diet to get the skin and gastrointestinal tract symptomless in order to perform the challenge test which remains the only reliable test for food allergy. Standardization of the APT materials and reading procedure will add to the reliability of this new test method.     

L’allergie aux vaccins associés chez l’enfant. Une étude de 30 cas fondée sur les tests cutanés à lecture immédiate,semi-retardée et retardée,sur les dosages des anticorps spécifiques et sur les injections de rappel

Skin tests (prick and intradermal) were performed with vaccines containing diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b antigens (D.P.T.Pol.Hib), and with selected components of the vaccines in 30 children reporting reactions suggestive of allergy to these vaccines. Serum-specific IgE and IgG against components of the vaccines were also studied. Immediate responses in skin tests and specific IgE determinations strongly suggested the diagnosis of immediate-type hypersensitivity to tetanus or diphtheria toxoids in ten children (33.3%), including four of the six children with anaphylaxis, and six of the 16 children with urticaria and angioedema. In the other 20 children, immediate, semi-late and late responses in skin tests and specific IgE determinations were negative. Booster immunizations were given with monovalent or bivalent vaccines in 14 of these children, and were well tolerated. Our results suggest that most large local reactions and mild to moderately severe generalized skin reactions to multivalent vaccines are not allergic, but instead result from a nonspecific inflammatory reaction. However, our results show that toxoids may induce immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions in children, and suggest that skin tests with vaccines and vaccine components, and the determination of specific IgE against vaccine components, are of diagnostic value in children with anaphylaxis, and immediate and accelerated urticaria and angioedema induced by booster injections of multivalent vaccines.     

Skin tests in patients with history of anaphylactic reaction to penicillin]

Skin tests including immediate patch test (IPT), skin prick test (SPT), or intradermal test (IT) with penicillin G(PenG) and SPT with benzylpenicilloyl human serum albumin (BPO) were done in 54 patients with history of anaphylactic reaction to penicillin or shock of unknown cause. 26 patients with penicillin allergy were diagnosed. BPO specific IgE measured with ELISA gave a lower positive rate in detecting penicillin allergy as compared with the tests mentioned above. The results of skin tests in 26 patients showed that IPT with 500 IU/ml of PenG was not only accurate but also safe. Because no skin injury occurred and PenG residue could be washed out, the amount of PenG penetrated into skin is very small, thus, adverse reactions were very few. It is recommended that IPT with PenG in 500 IU/ml concentration is performed at the beginning of skin tests. If negative, SPT and then IT both with a solution of 500 IU/ml concentration are carried out, until a positive reaction occurs. This procedure is relatively accurate, simple and safe.     

Predictive value of the sulfidoleukotriene release assay in oral allergy syndrome to celery, hazelnut, and carrot.

BACKGROUND: Patients sensitized to birch pollen frequently suffer from a food allergy to plant foods such as celery, carrots, or hazelnut. One of the main manifestations of birch pollen-related food allergy is the oral allergy syndrome. Skin tests and allergen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E determinations are poor predictors of such reactions when assessed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a cellular test based on leukotriene release from basophils, the cellular antigen stimulation test in combination with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CAST-ELISA), is predictive of pollen-related food allergy. METHODS: Birch pollen-sensitized patients with positive DBPCFC to celery (n=21), hazelnut (n=15), and carrot (n=7) underwent skin tests along with determination of specific IgE and CAST-ELISA for the respective allergens. The results were compared with those of 24 birch pollen-sensitized patients with negative open food challenge to celery, hazelnut, and carrot. RESULTS: While skin prick tests had a sensitivity of 85%, 80%, and 29% for commercial extracts of celery, hazelnut, and carrot, respectively, prick testing with self-prepared extracts yielded sensitivities of 100%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. For specific IgE determinations, sensitivities were 71%, 73%, and 57%, respectively, and the respective specificities were 67%, 73%, and 60%. For CAST-ELISA with various sources and doses of allergens, the sensitivity varied from 71% to 95% for celery, 73% to 80% for hazelnut, and 43% to 86% for carrot. The respective specificities were 67% to 92%, 75% to 88%, and 77% to 91%. Analysis of the predictive value of CAST-ELISA with receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the results of the tests were more predictive of pollen-related food allergy than quantitative allergen-specific IgE determinations. CONCLUSIONS: CAST-ELISA is more specific than routine diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of pollen-related food allergy to celery, hazelnut, and carrot.     

Oral rush desensitization with tomato: a case report.

Adverse food reaction in which no immunological mechanism is demonstrated should be termed nonallergic food hypersensitivity or food intolerance. We present the case of a 12-year-old girl with a clinical history of abdominal pain, nausea, and general malaise after tomato intake which completely remitted with antihistamines. The patient underwent a complete allergy evaluation: skin prick tests, serum specific IgE and IgG4 tests to tomato, and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge. Skin prick tests and specific IgE to tomato were negative while the food challenge was positive. At the end of the workup, the patient underwent an oral rush desensitizing treatment. At the end of the treatment the patient could eat a maintenance dose of 100 g of tomato daily with no side effects at all. This successful result suggests that the oral desensitizing treatment can be used in patients with nonallergic food hypersensitivity.     

Diagnostic tests for patients with suspected allergic disease. Utility and limitations

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of diagnostic tests used for persons with suspected allergic disease. DESIGN: Information synthesis based on historical review of developments in the understanding of the pathophysiology of allergic diseases and on selected recent literature on efficacy of specific diagnostic tests. MAIN RESULTS: Skin testing is most effective when based on clues from the patient's history. The sensitivity and specificity of skin testing methods are compared: skin prick testing alone is often sufficient to identify or exclude immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity, including food allergy. Except for penicillin and certain macromolecules, skin testing is not useful for evaluating drug allergy. Skin test titration may be useful for determining the starting dose for immunotherapy; otherwise it is rarely necessary. The patch skin test helps identify the cause of allergic contact dermatitis. Bronchial provocation testing is useful in special cases. Oral provocation testing may be used to identify allergy or other intolerance to suspected foods, food additives, and certain drugs. Provocation testing is time-consuming and requires special precautions. In-vitro methods for identifying allergen-specific IgE are especially useful when skin testing is unreliable, equivocal, or cannot be done. In-vitro tests should be used as adjuncts to the clinical interview and examination. CONCLUSIONS: Tests that are effective for identifying allergenic substances usually can be determined from a careful patient interview. Clinicians should be aware of nonspecific test results and allergy tests of unproven effectiveness.     

The use of in vivo and in vitro tests in children with beta lactam allergy

BackgroundDrug allergies are reactions within the context of drug hypersensitivity reactions, which are caused by immunological mechanisms due to a previously sensitising drug. Beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) are the leading agents causing drug hypersensitivity reactions in children.The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic importance of in vivo and in vitro diagnostic tests in children with suspected immediate-type BLA hypersensitivity and to investigate the frequency of their use for the final diagnosis.MethodsPatients admitted to the Outpatient Clinic of Division of Paediatric Allergy and Immunology with suspicion of immediate-type BLA hypersensitivity between December 2014 and December 2018 were investigated. Patients with a history of immediate reactions to BLA were examined by performing drug specific IgE, skin prick tests, intradermal tests and drug provocation tests (DPT).ResultsDuring the study period, 148 patients were admitted to our clinic with suspected immediate-type BLA hypersensitivity. Forty-eight patients completed all assessment steps and were enrolled in the study. It has been shown that 27 patients did not have drug allergy. BLA hypersensitivity was proven in 21 patients by using in vivo test algorithm. More than half of the patients were diagnosed via skin tests with culprit drug.ConclusionAllergy work-up should be performed in patients with immediate reactions to BLA. A skin test can demonstrate BLA hypersensitivity in most patients. Thus, skin tests should be performed prior to the drug provocation test.     

Diagnosis of latex hypersensitivity: comparison of different methods

A standardized diagnostic protocol for latex allergy is still lacking, although latex-related manifestations are a common health problem especially among health-care workers and patients with spina bifida. The present study was aimed to compare different in vivo (skin prick test, patch test, use test) and in vitro (specific IgE determination by CAP-Rast, basophil histamine release assay, immunoblot) methods to diagnose latex sensitization in 47 health care workers reporting latex-related manifestations. According to the established criteria, 20 subjects (42.5%) were considered as truly sensitized to latex, 18 with type I and 2 with type IV hypersensitivity. Skin prick test displayed the highest diagnostic efficiency, having higher sensitivity and specificity than specific IgE determination and use test. Patch test with rubber chemicals had a low sensitivity, but a good specificity. Basophil histamine release and immunoblot showed low sensitivity and specificity. A combination of clinical history and skin prick test should be used in order to diagnose latex allergy, except in those subjects reporting life-threatening reactions, in which in vitro specific IgE determination must be preferred. Patch testing with rubber chemicals should be reserved to selected cases. Basophil histamine release and immunoblotting can be performed for research purpose, but cannot be recommended for routine diagnostic use.     

The analysis of Hymenoptera hypersensitive patients in Ankara, Turkey

BackgroundAlthough there are some published data about the prevalence of honeybee and vespid venom allergy from Turkey, there has been no report about Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy practice. Our aim was to determine the characteristics of Hymenoptera venom hypersensitivity and venom immunotherapy practice in Ankara, Turkey.MethodsDemographic and clinical data, intradermal test, and serum specific IgE results of 65 Hymenoptera venom allergic patients who were followed up in our department from February 2005 to August 2009 were analysed.ResultsSerum Vespula specific IgE class (p:0.02) and Apis specific IgE class were high (p<0.0001) and Apis intradermal test results were positive (p<0.001) in accordance with the patients’ history. However, intradermal test results with Vespula were not consistent with self-reported Hymenoptera type (p:0.15). While Apis specific IgE and intradermal test results were correlated with each other (rho: 0.59, p<0.0001), Vespula specific IgE and intradermal test results were not (rho: 0.2, p:0.17). Intradermal test against Vespula did not discriminate between Apis and Vespula hypersensitive patients. There were no significant differences when the grade of reaction and specific IgE and intradermal test results were compared between Apis and Vespula.ConclusionsVespula venom hypersensitivity was more common among our patients. However, intradermal tests with Vespula had limited diagnostic sensitivity and were not correlated with serum specific IgE. Based on our results and previous reports, we recommend that negative skin test responses, especially with Vespula, need further investigation.     

The Role of Inhalant Food Allergens in Occupational Asthma

Workers handling food products and derivatives are at increased risk of developing occupational asthma. Exposure to food allergens occurs primarily through inhalation of dust, steam, vapors, and aerosolized proteins generated during cutting, scrubbing or cleaning, cooking or boiling, and drying activities. Suspicion of the diagnosis of occupational asthma should lead to proper investigation to confirm the diagnosis objectively. Most inhaled food allergy is IgE mediated, and skin prick tests or specific IgE tests are useful tools to support the diagnosis, but objective evidence of asthma by monitoring of peak expiratory flows at and off work or specific inhalation challenges offers a better diagnostic value. This article provides a list of the various foods, food additives, and contaminants that have been associated with occupational asthma.     

Clinical value of morphine,pholcodine and poppy seed IgE assays in drug-abusers and allergic people

BackgroundThe diagnosis of anaphylactic reactions due to opiates during anaesthesia can be difficult, since in most cases various drugs may have been administered. Detection of specific IgE to poppy seed might be a marker for sensitisation to opiates in allergic people and heroin-abusers. This study assessed the clinical value of morphine, pholcodine and poppy seed skin-prick and IgE determination in people suffering hypersensitivity reactions during anaesthesia or analgesia and drug-abusers with allergic symptoms.MethodsWe selected heroin abusers and patients who suffered severe reactions during anaesthesia and analgesia from a database of 23,873 patients. The diagnostic yield (sensitivity, specificity and predictive value) of prick and IgE tests in determining opiate allergy was analysed.ResultsOverall, 149 patients and 200 controls, mean age 32.9 ± 14.7 years, were included. All patients with positive prick to opiates showed positive prick and IgE to poppy seeds, but not to morphine or pholcodine IgE. Among drug-abusers, 13/42 patients (31%) presented opium hypersensitivity confirmed by challenge tests. Among non-drug abusers, sensitisation to opiates was higher in people allergic to tobacco (25%), P<.001. Prick tests and IgE against poppy seed had a good sensitivity (95.6% and 82.6%, respectively) and specificity (98.5% and 100%, respectively) in the diagnosis of opiate allergy.ConclusionsOpiates may be significant allergens. Drug-abusers and people sensitised to tobacco are at risk. Both the prick and specific IgE tests efficiently detected sensitisation to opiates. The highest levels were related to more-severe clinical profiles.     

Valeur diagnostique des prick-tests,des IgE spécifiques et du test de libération d’histamine pour le diagnostic de routine d’allergie aux hyménoptères

Objectives. – Studies performed to assess the diagnostic value of tests for hymenoptera allergy are usually designed to validate the test whereas very few have evaluated these tests in routine diagnostic situations. In fact, the diagnostic value of such tests, especially skin prick-tests and basophil histamine release, has rarely been studied systematically in patients referred by their physician to an allergist for confirmation of the diagnosis and recommendations for immunotherapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of skin prick-tests, specific IgE assay and basophil histamine release in patients referred to an allergy unit for suspected hymenoptera venom allergy.Patients and methods. – Diagnostic tests were done prospectively in 25 consecutive patients with allergic reactions to hymenoptera venom defined by clinical history and positive intradermal skin tests, including patients with a localized or a more extensive skin reaction associated with malaise and/or respiratory symptoms, and in 21 control subjects. The hymenoptera studied included yellow jacket (YJ) and honeybee (HB). The sensitivity, specificity, concordance and predictive values of the tests were calculated.Results. – The observed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negatives predictive values of skin prick-tests with 100 μg/mL HB venom (in percent) 33.3; 100; 100; and 85.7, respectively, and with 100 μg/mL YJ venom 30; 100; 100 and 85, respectively. For skin prick-tests with 300 μg/mL HB venom the values were 75; 100; 100 and 94, respectively and for skin prick-tests with 300 μg/mL YJ venom 57; 100; 100 and 90.3, respectively. For specific IgE assays, the values for HB were 100; 95.2; 84 and 100, respectively and for YJ 100; 76.2; 51.2, and 100, respectively. For basophil histamine release the values for HB were 89; 100; 100 and 97.3 for YJ they were 94; 89, 6 and 98.4, respectively.Conclusions. – Skin prick-tests with venom concentrations under 300 μg/mL are not sensitive enough for an accurate diagnosis of hymenoptera allergy. Basophil histamine release appears to be a good complementary test but it needs better standardization.     

A new quantitative in vitro for the detection of latex-specific IgE antibodies

Immediate-type hypersensitivity to latex allergens has resulted in anaphylactic shock and death in numerous reported cases. The allergenic proteins of latex are contained within the natural rubber extract of Hevea brasiliensis and are eluted into the final product during the manufacturing process. The quantity and types of latex allergens found in different latex products depends on the manufacturing process. Not all of these allergens are available for use in the latex prick skin test, and as a result, such tests may not be conclusive. Furthermore, application of such allergens to the skin of undiagnosed hypersensitive individuals may have harmful effects on their health. Therefore, it is important to be able to utilize in vitro methods, which reliably identify latex allergy without placing hypersensitive individuals at risk. We have developed a relatively simple and new enzyme immuno-assay (EIA) method for the detection of latex allergy. This in vitro method is quantitative and allows for the classification of allergy to latex in a short time. In comparative studies, ninety-nine serum specimens with documented clinical history of latex allergy were tested by this method, and the results paralleled those of the skin prick test performed by an independent group. The data showed that the specificity and sensitivity of our assay approaches 97.5% and 100%, respectively. We conclude that, by using a simple assay, the detection of specific IgE to latex proteins may be valuable for screening individuals and for the diagnosis of allergy to latex.     

Oral Specific Desensitization in Food-Allergic Children

The possibility of obtaining oral desensitization in patients with food allergy is still a matter of debate. We decided to evaluate the safety and efficacy of standardized protocols for oral desensitization with the most common food allergens. Forty-two children (ages up to 16 years) diagnosed as affected by food allergy (on the basis of clinical history, skin prick tests, measurement of specific IgE, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge) underwent a sublingual-oral desensitizing treatment according to new standardized protocols. The control group consisted of 10 patients who followed an elimination diet. The treatment was successfully completed by 85.7% of the patients. Specific IgE showed a significant decrease, while specific IgG₄ showed a significant increase, in all treated patients. The immunological modifications observed in our patients lead us to hypothesize that oral tolerance may be mediated by the same mechanisms as those involved in traditional desensitizing treatments for respiratory and insect sting allergy.     

Diagnosis of Food Allergy: Epicutaneous Skin Tests, In Vitro Tests, and Oral Food Challenge

Food allergy is becoming an increasingly common diagnosis. Because of this increase in prevalence, it is imperative that physicians evaluating patients with possible adverse reactions to foods understand the currently available assays and how they should best be used to accurately diagnose the disease. Simple tests such as skin prick testing (SPT) and serum food-specific IgE testing are the most commonly used diagnostic tests to evaluate for IgE-mediated food reactions. However, these tests, which measure sensitization and not clinical allergy, are not without pitfalls, and their utility must be appreciated to avoid over- and underdiagnosis. Although the physician-supervised oral food challenge remains the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis, a careful medical history paired with SPT and serum food-specific IgE testing often can provide a reliable diagnosis. In this review, we examine the usefulness and pitfalls of SPT and serum food-specific IgE levels, as well as examine atopy patch testing and other emerging tests, such as component-resolved diagnostics and the basophil activation test. Finally, we describe the use of the double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge as the current gold standard for food allergy diagnosis.     

Egg and milk allergy in asthmatic children: assessment by immulite allergy food panel, skin prick tests and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges

There is a perception that asthmatic symptoms may be worsoned by ingestion of certain foods. This study aimed to investigate whether ingestion of cow's milk or egg might induce respiratory symptoms in asthmatic children. Fifty asthmatic children aged 1.5 to 6 years old, with positive Immulite Food Panel FP5 test results were included in the study. Fifty healthy children within the same age group were accepted as control group. Total serum IgE levels were measured and skin prick tests for food allergens including milk and egg were performed. All of the subjects underwent oral, double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge with fresh egg and cow's milk powder. Two medical histories were confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge in 9 patients (22.2%). Skin prick tests were positive in 9 patients (18%) with milk and 18 patients (36%) with egg antigen. Two children experienced wheezing, one after ingesting milk and the other after egg challenge (4%). In the control group no positive reactions were seen with egg or milk challenges. Our findings confirm that food allergy can elicit asthma in children, but its incidence is low, even with major allergens such as egg and milk. History, specific IgE determinations and skin prick tests are not reliable in diagnosing food reactions. Since any diet can cause rapid deficiencies in infancy, diet restrictions must not be applied, without performing double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge.     

High frequency of atopic asthma in a pulmonary clinic population

Seventy-two consecutive adult asthmatic patients seen in the Pulmonary Clinic at Rhode Island Hospital were tested for atopy by prick test with 14 standard aeroallergens and by in vitro total and specific IgE determinations (FAST). A total of 58.3 percent of patients were found to be atopic by these tests. There was a significant difference between the mean total serum IgE in atopic and nonatopic asthma and in atopic asthma and control subjects. The age onset was lower in atopic asthmatic patients, and they were more likely to have a history of chronic rhinitis than nonatopic subjects. Family history of rhinitis or asthma and severity of asthma was not different between the two groups. Since our outpatient facility has a large allergy clinic in proximity to the pulmonary clinic, which was the source of our patient population, this investigation has a negative bias toward allergy. Nevertheless, this study reveals that atopy is common in adult asthmatic patients, and a battery of allergy tests (skin tests or in vitro tests) together with total serum IgE is able to differentiate between atopic and nonatopic asthma.     

Basophil activation and sulfidoleukotriene production in patients with immediate allergy to betalactam antibiotics and negative skin tests.

BACKGROUND: New in vitro diagnostic methods for IgE-mediated drug allergic reactions, such as basophil activation test and antigen specific sulfidoleukotriene test, have proven their usefulness in patients with positive skin tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of basophil activation test and antigen specific sulfidoleukotriene test in the diagnosis of patients with IgE-mediated allergy to Betalactam antibiotics and negative skin tests. METHODS: The 23 patients included in the study underwent basophil activation test, antigen specific sulfidoleukotriene test and specific IgE. The patients were classified into three groups. GROUP A: patients with positive specific IgE. GROUP B: patients with a unique immediate reaction to Betalactams, negative specific IgE and positive oral provocation tests. And Group C: patients with at least two immediate reactions induced by Betalactams and negative specific IgE. RESULTS: The sensitivity/specificity of the different tests are: basophil activation test 39.1 %/93.3%, antigen specific sulfidoleukotriene test 22.7%/83.3%, specific IgE 21.7%/86.7%. The joint use of the three tests allows diagnosis of 60.9% of the patients. CONCLUSION: In vitro diagnostic tests, especially basophil activation test, are very important tools in the diagnosis of patients with IgE-mediated allergy to Betalactams and negative skin tests, avoiding performance of potentially dangerous oral provocation tests in a high percentage of cases.     

花椒严重过敏反应及花椒致敏组分分析

目的总结15例花椒严重过敏反应患者的临床特点、点刺试验、特异性IgE结果,并对花椒致敏组分进行分析。方法采用统一问卷,收集所有花椒过敏反应患者的临床资料。用ImmunoCAP检测血清花椒籽和花椒皮特异性IgE。用Powerlook2100XL（UMAX）扫描和imageQuant TL软件分析花椒籽和花椒皮的SDS-PAGE蛋白电泳成分和免疫印迹结果。结果花椒过敏15例,男6例、女9例,就诊年龄28～59岁,均表现为速发型食物过敏反应,过敏反应均发生于进食过敏食物后30分钟内;14例诊断为严重过敏反应,其中5例曾发生过敏性休克（2例伴有意识丧失）,1例诊断为急性荨麻疹。14例起始症状为口咽部过敏反应。该组病例均伴有多种食物,如腰果、开心果、橘子、金桔、芝麻、杏仁、榛子、松子、芒果等过敏;15例均存在腰果和/或开心果过敏,但进食花生、黄豆均不过敏。食物过敏病程1～17年不等。10例过敏患者花椒籽点刺试验均为强阳性,2例为3＋、8例为4＋,2例出现全身反应,24小时内好转;花椒皮点刺试验1例为2＋,2例为＋,7例为-。3例健康对照者花椒皮和花椒籽点刺试验均为阴性。13例花椒过敏患者中,花椒籽特异性IgE,1例为2级,余12例均为3级以上;花椒皮特异性IgE,11例为0级,2例为2级。花椒籽与花椒皮特异性IgE比较,差异有显著性意义（P〈0.00014）。花椒籽和花椒皮致敏组分蛋白免疫印记结果显示,7例患者中1例相对分子质量为11400～12400,3例为11400,1例为11300,1例为11400～12500,1例无结合条带。结论进食少量花椒即可能诱发严重的过敏反应,甚至过敏性休克。花椒过敏反应是由IgE介导的速发型食物过敏反应,部分患者可表现为速发相和迟发相双相反应。花椒变应原来自花椒籽,而不是花椒皮。对花椒高度敏感个体,花椒点刺试验有可能诱发全身过敏反应。目前检测到的花椒籽变应原致敏组分蛋白的相对分     

Hypersensitivity reactions to fluoroquinolones

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics cause immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions, and may also affect internal organs and circulating blood cells. The underlying pathomechanisms are only partly understood. The extent of cross-reactivity among different quinolones depends on the type of clinical manifestation and its underlying mechanism. Despite recent advances, reliable diagnostic tests are still lacking. Recent studies have shown quinolone-specific IgE in vitro in more than 50% of patients with immediate-type reactions and a considerable cross-reactivity with related compounds. In maculopapular drug exanthems from ciprofloxacin, specific T-cell clones were identified, and cross-reactivity to related compounds was detected in approximately 50% of the clones. From re-exposure studies in patients with exanthems, cross-reactivity appears to be lower. Cellular tests such as lymphocyte transformation tests are currently not very useful. For prick and intradermal skin tests, widely divergent nonirritant test concentrations have been recommended. Desensitization may be possible in selected patients.