早期康复训练在预防腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的应用研究

目的 探讨早期康复训练对预防腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的应用效果.方法 将100例拟行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者随机分成观察组和对照组各50例,观察组实施早期康复训练,术前及术后早期均进行提肛训练;对照组实施常规护理,仅在术后进行提肛训练.比较两组患者术后拔除尿管后尿失禁发生率、尿控功能恢复时间以及观察组术前不同提肛训练时间与术后尿失禁发生率的关系.结果 观察组术后尿失禁发生率、尿控功能恢复时间均明显低于对照组(P＜0.05);不同术前提肛训练时间尿失禁发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 早期康复训练有助于预防腹腔前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的发生,缩短尿控功能恢复时间.     

保留尿道括约肌功能对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿控的影响

目的:探讨保留尿道括约肌功能对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿控的影响。方法:选取2013年5月至2015年8月收治的行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的80例前列腺癌患者作为研究对象,依据是否保留尿道括约肌功能分为对照组(未保留)及研究组(保留),每组40例,对比两组患者术后3个月的尿控情况。结果:两组患者尿控分级差异有统计学意义(P0.05);术后两组患者前列腺体积、前列腺特异性抗原、ICI-Q-SF评分、总并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:保留尿道括约肌功能可显著提高腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后的尿控效果,改善前列腺体积、前列腺特异性抗原、ICI-Q-SF评分等指标,降低术后并发症发生率,有助于尿控目标的实现,提高了患者的生活质量,具有重要的应用价值。     

最长尿道长度保存对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尽快恢复尿控的意义研究

目的:研究最长尿道长度保存(maximal urethral length preservation,MULP)对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尽快恢复尿控的临床意义。方法:回顾性分析我院2013年2月~2015年3月80例行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的临床资料,随访至2016年3月。其中40例进行MULP腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者为治疗组,另外40例非行MULP腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者为对照组,在手术前两组患者年龄、平均BMI、既往史(糖尿病)、术前NHT、前列腺体积、术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、术前Gleason评分、术前病理T分期均无统计学意义(P0.05)。比较治疗组与对照组手术时间、切缘阳性率、前列腺尖部切缘阳性率、术后PSA(ng/ml)、术后Gleason评分、并发症率及两组患者术后1、3、6、12个月尿控恢复情况、国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷表简表(ICI-QSF)评分情况。结果:两组患者手术都成功完成,两组术后3、6、12个月并发症发生率、切缘阳性率、前列腺尖部切缘阳性率及PSA0.2ng/ml的比率差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后1、3个月尿控恢复人数和ICIQ-SF评分情况差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);术后6、12个月的尿控恢复人数和ICI-Q-SF评分情况差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:行MULP的腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术有利于术后早期尽快恢复尿控,且不增加切缘阳性率。     

负压治疗联合盆底肌训练对前列腺癌根治术后患者控尿功能及性功能的影响

目的探讨负压治疗联合盆底肌训练对前列腺癌根治术后患者控尿功能及主观幸福感的影响。方法将中山大学附属第三医院2016年10月至2019年4月泌尿外科确诊为前列腺癌并行腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术治疗的70例患者,按随机数字表法分为干预组和对照组各35例,其中对照组35例采用常规护理(盆底肌功能锻炼),干预组35例在常规护理基础上,术后6周起再增加负压治疗。比较对照组和干预组术后6周、10周、18周控尿功能恢复情况,同时进行国际勃起功能评分表(IIEF-5)评分及主观幸福感调查,观察其治疗效果。结果干预组术后6周、10周、18周尿失禁评分中位值分别2分、1分与0分,低于对照组的2分、2分与2分,提示干预组术后平均控尿功能恢复时间较对照组短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);此外干预组相比对照组,IIEF-5评分及主观幸福感评分上升速度较快,提示干预组术后勃起功能和生活质量改善情况明显优于对照组。结论负压治疗联合盆底肌训练对前列腺癌根治术后患者的控尿功能和性功能有明显改善,且缩短其恢复时间。     

保留尿控功能在耻骨后前列腺癌根治术的应用

目的:探讨保护耻骨前列腺韧带和保护尿道膜部括约肌群在耻骨后前列腺癌根治术后减少尿失禁的作用.方法:Ⅰ组32例前列腺癌按常规操作行耻骨后前列腺癌根治术,Ⅱ组32例前列腺癌采用保留耻骨前列腺韧带和尿道膜部括约肌群的方法行耻骨后前列腺癌根治术,术后1、3、6、12个月分别随访尿失禁情况.结果:两组年龄和PSA无显著差异,两组前列腺尖端切缘均无肿瘤残留,前列腺侧缘阳性率类似.Ⅱ组术后1、3、6个月尿控效果明显优于I组(P<0.05),但1年随访,Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组尿控效果类似.结论:在耻骨后前列腺癌根治术中保留耻骨前列腺韧带作用和尿道膜部括约肌群有显著提高近期尿控的效果,但1年随访两组尿控率无明显差异.     

腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中尿控功能保护的方法和手术技巧

目的探讨腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中尿控功能的保护,预防术后尿失禁的手术方法及技巧。方法对2008年10月至2012年6月施行的81例腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术资料进行回顾性研究。81例TNM分期为T1C～T2C的前列腺癌患者行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术,其中经腹膜外径路15例,经腹腔途径66例。术中注重以下策略：①可靠处理背血管复合体;②尽量保留神经血管束,对部分低危患者施行筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术;③保留足够的功能性尿道;④黏膜对黏膜无张力吻合。所有患者于术后1、3、6和12个月随访尿控情况。结果术后留置导尿管7～23d。所有患者均随访满6个月,77例患者随访满12个月。术后6个月,白天62例（76．5％）患者尿控良好,尿失禁19例;夜间68例（84．0％）患者尿控良好,尿失禁13例。术后12个月,白天70例（90．9％）患者尿控良好,尿失禁7例;夜间74例（96．1％）患者尿控良好,仍有尿失禁3例。筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术5例,术后7～11d拔除导尿管后,仅1例白天有尿失禁,随访至术后3个月,已无一例存在尿失禁。随访期间无一例出现尿道狭窄。结论腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的尿控功能恢复是渐进式的,绝大多数患者在术后12个月恢复尿控能力。术野清晰,努力做到解剖性前列腺切除,保留尽可能多的功能性尿道长度,黏膜对黏膜无张力吻合（避免术后尿道狭窄）,将膜部尿道缝合至趾骨后就能获得良好的尿控效果。对低危的前列腺癌患者施行筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术将能获得最佳尿控结果。     

经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗局限性高危前列腺癌的临床分析

目的探讨经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗局限性高危前列腺癌的临床价值。方法选择2014年9月至2017年8月在昆明医科大学第二附属医院行经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的72例前列腺癌患者为研究对象,术前均确诊为局限性前列腺癌。根据D'Amico分级标准将72例患者分为低中危组27例患者、高危组45例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量及输血量、切缘阳性率、病理评分、术后住院天数、留置尿管时间、尿控、围手术期并发症等指标。结果两组手术时间、术中出血量、输血量、住院天数以及尿控率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。切缘阳性率低中危组2例,高危组13例;术后随访3~35个月生化复发低中危组2例,高危组11例。结论经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术在治疗局限性高危前列腺癌患者方面技术上安全可行,近期疗效较好,远期疗效需要进一步随访观察。     

低频电疗法联合盆底肌锻炼防治机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的疗效观察

目的:探讨低频电疗法联合盆底肌功能锻炼对行机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术患者术后尿失禁(UI)的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月～2018年6月在我院接受机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术治疗的48例患者的临床资料,将予以常规护理的24例患者为对照组,在常规护理的基础上同时予以低频电子脉冲膀胱治疗仪联合盆底肌功能锻炼法辅助治疗的24例患者为观察组。结果:观察组患者术后早期UI的发生率明显低于对照组(37.5%vs.66.7%,P0.05),其恢复期3个月内尿控率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对接受机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术的患者行低频电疗法联合盆底肌功能锻炼可显著降低术后早期UI的发生率,提高恢复期控尿率,并可促进患者控尿功能的恢复。     

腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺癌的临床体会

目的：探讨腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术在高危前列腺癌治疗中的价值。方法回顾性分析2012年3月～2014年11月本院腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗26例高危前列腺癌的临床资料。患者平均年龄65．2岁,术前检查单独PSA≥20ng／mL者9例;兼具PSA≥20ng／mL并Gleason评分≥8分者17例;术前诊断T3 b和T4期各1例。3例患者因前列腺体积过大术前分别行3～6个月新辅助内分泌治疗。手术方式均采用经腹膜外路径腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术,同时行盆腔淋巴结清扫。结果26例手术均获成功,平均手术时间152min,平均出血量85mL,无输血病例。所有患者均于术后两周拔除导尿管,8例拔管后尿失禁,经盆底训练后于1周至3个月恢复控尿。术后病理T2a～T2b,Gleason评分≤7分者10例;T2c～T4,Gleason评分≥8分者16例。术中清扫淋巴结数目平均5．5个,淋巴结阳性3例;切缘阳性4例,术后控尿恢复后予局部放射治疗。19例获访3～30个月,所有患者均控尿良好,PSA≤0．2ng／mL。结论对高危前列腺癌患者采用以根治性前列腺癌切除术为核心的综合治疗策略安全有效,可使患者获益。     

提高腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后控尿的临床研究

目的 分析总结腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术51例手术控尿技术的经验.方法 回顾性总结腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者51例.术前均病理证实前列腺癌诊断.T la～1b 4例(8%),T 1c 15例(29%),T2a 7例(14%),T2b 5例(10%),T2c 20例(39%).结果 腹腔镜下成功完成前列腺癌根治术49例.术后发生尿漏3例,均自愈.术后尿管留置14～45 d,平均16 d.术后随访3～53个月,平均17个月.术后3个月随访51例患者,13例尿失禁;术后6个月随访39例患者,7例尿失禁;术后12个月随访患者20例,5例尿失禁,其中完全性尿失禁1例.前20例和后31例在术后3个月时尿失禁发生率分别为6/20(30%)和7/31(22%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).直肠损伤2例,行结肠造口术.术后复发2例,一例行内分泌治疗后停药.另一例肺转移手术后死亡.其余病例前列腺特异抗原<0.2μL.结论 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗局限性前列腺癌是安全、有效的.术后控尿功能主要与术中前列腺尖部、耻骨前列腺韧带和神经血管束的处理及手术经验相关.     

Pelvic floor muscle training to improve urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of effectiveness

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for treating urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) by reviewing evidence from randomized trials. METHODS: Randomized trials published in English were included if they involved men with UI after RP and compared PFMT with a control group. Data were abstracted onto a standardized form using a prospectively developed protocol. RESULTS: Eleven trials randomizing 1028 men (mean age 64 years) met the inclusion criteria; the duration of the trials was 3-12 months. One trial of 300 men found that those assigned to PFMT achieved continence more quickly (after 1, 3 and 6 months) than men not assigned to PFMT. Men receiving biofeedback-enhanced PFMT were more likely to achieve continence or have no continual leakage than those with no training within 1-2 months after RP (relative benefit increase 1.54; 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.34; four trials reporting). The relative benefit increase (1.19, 0.82-1.72; five studies) was no longer significant after 3-4 months. Biofeedback-enhanced PFMT was comparable to written/verbal PFMT instruction. Extracorporeal magnetic innervation (ExMI) and electrical stimulation (ES) were found to be initially (within 1-2 months) more effective than PFMT in one trial, but there were no significant differences between groups at > or = 3 months. CONCLUSION: Based on available evidence, PFMT with or without biofeedback enhancement hastens the return to continence more than no PFMT in men with UI after RP. Additional trials are needed to confirm whether ExMI and ES are effective conservative treatment options.     

Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence

PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy is a significant clinical problem. In this prospective study we investigate the effectiveness of early pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on a large population, that had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) at our department. METHODS: 300 consecutive patients who had undergone RRP for clinically confined prostate cancer were randomized in two groups after catheter removal. One group of 150 patients took part in a structured PFMT program. This began before discharge and consisted of Kegel exercises. The remaining 150 patients constituted the control group, they were not formally instructed in PFMT. Incontinence was assessed objectively using the 1 hour and 24 hour pad test, as well as with the ICS-Male questionnaire. All patients who were incontinent after 6 months underwent urodynamic evaluation. RESULTS: In the treated group, 19% (29 patients) achieved continence after 1 month, and 94.6% (146 patients) after 6 months. In the control group 8% (12 patients) achieved continence after 1 month, and 65% (97 patients) after 6 months (p<0.001). Patient age did not correlate with continence in the control group (p>0.05), although a significant correlation was revealed within the treated group (p<0.01). Overall, 93.3% of the total population achieved continence after one year. CONCLUSIONS: After RRP an early supportive rehabilitation program like PFMT significantly reduces continence recovery time.     

The effects of Pilates method on pelvic floor muscle strength in patients with post‐prostatectomy urinary incontinence: A randomized clinical trial

Aims

To assess the effects of a Pilates exercise program compared to conventional pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) protocol on pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS) in patients with post‐prostatectomy urinary incontinence.

Methods

Patients were randomized into three treatment groups (G1: Pilates, G2: electrical stimulation combined with PFMT, and G3: control group). Duration of therapy was 10 weeks. Baseline assessment included the 24 h pad‐test and the ICI‐Q questionnaire. PFMS was measured using a manometric perineometry device at baseline and 4 months after radical prostatectomy (RP). The level of significance was P < 0.05.

Results

One hundred twenty three patients were randomized and 104 patients completed the study protocol (G1: n = 34; G2: n = 35; G3: n = 35). Post‐treatment assessment showed statistically significant improvements in maximum strength in G2, increased endurance in G1 and G2, and increment of muscle power in all three groups (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean changes of maximum strength, endurance, and muscle power between groups after treatment (P > 0.05). G1 and G2 achieved a higher number of fully continent patients than G3 (P < 0.05). At the end of treatment, 59% of patients in G1, 54% in G2, and 26% in G3 were continent (no pads/day).

Conclusions

Improvements in PFMS parameters were distinct among active treatment groups versus controls, but did not predict recovery of urinary continence at final assessment. The Pilates method promoted similar outcomes in the proportion of fully continent patients when compared to conventional PFMT 4 months after RP.     

Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: Predictive factors of recovery after 1 year of surgery

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical prognosis of incontinence and to determine the predictors for further recovery of urinary continence in patients not achieving urinary continence within 1 year after radical prostatectomy. Methods: A total of 708 patients were evaluated regarding urinary continence status at 1 year after surgery from a prospectively maintained radical prostatectomy database. Of these, 73 (10.3%) did not recover urinary continence within 1 year after surgery. For these patients, incontinence status and the number of pads for urinary control were assessed serially. Results: In 708 patients, factors associated with the recovery of urinary continence within 1 year after radical prostatectomy were membranous urethral length, prostatic apex shape and patient age. Among 73 patients with urinary incontinence, 41 (56.2%) achieved urinary continence with a mean time of 15.4 months subsequent to the first year after radical prostatectomy (baseline). A younger age at surgery (P = 0.027) and one pad being required (vs≥2 pads) at baseline (P = 0.046) were identified as independent factors for achievement of urinary continence within a further 2 years. Only the number of pads was a significant factor for further recovery of urinary continence in the longer follow up (hazard ratio 0.36, P = 0.029). Conclusion: Compared with factors related to the prostate or membranous urethra, patient age and severity of incontinence at 1 year after radical prostatectomy are more strongly related to the recovery of urinary continence later than 1 year after surgery. These findings might help to decide whether a definite treatment is required for persistent incontinence beyond 1 year after radical prostatectomy.     

The role of pelvic floor exercises on post-prostatectomy incontinence

PURPOSE: Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence occurs in 0.5% to 87% of patients. This condition may be attributable to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency, and/or detrusor abnormalities. Previous studies of pelvic floor exercise (PFE) for improving post-prostatectomy incontinence have shown mixed results. We determined whether preoperative and early postoperative biofeedback enhanced PFE with a dedicated physical therapist would improve the early return of urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy from November 1998 to June 1999 were randomly assigned to a control or a treatment group. The treatment group of 19 patients was referred to physical therapy and underwent PFE sessions before and after surgery. Patients were also given instructions to continue PFE at home twice daily after surgery. The control group of 19 men underwent surgery without formal PFE instructions. All patients completed postoperative urinary incontinence questionnaires at 6, 12, 16, 20, 28 and 52 weeks. Incontinence was measured by the number of pads used with 0 or 1 daily defined as continence. RESULTS: Overall 66% of the patients were continent at 16 weeks. A greater fraction of the treatment group regained urinary continence earlier compared with the control group at 12 weeks (p <0.05). Three control and 2 treatment group patients had severe incontinence (greater than 3 pads daily) at 16 and 52 weeks. Of all patients 82% regained continence by 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: PFE therapy instituted prior to radical prostatectomy aids in the earlier achievement of urinary incontinence. However, PFE has limited benefit in patients with severe urinary incontinence 16 weeks after surgery. There is a minimal long-term benefit of PFE training since continence rates at 1 year were similar in the 2 groups.     

Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence

OBJECTIVES: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy continues to be a distressing problem, even with preservation of the neurovascular bundles and meticulous apical dissection. Recent studies suggest that motor and sensory components of the pelvic nerve may be affected by surgery, since both components are anatomically located in intimate contact with the seminal vesicles. We propose seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy to preserve pelvic innervation and improve the rate of urinary continence. METHODS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in this prospective study. A standard retropubic radical prostatectomy was performed in 34 patients. A seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy was performed in a pilot series of 20 consecutive patients. The seminal vesicle tip and surrounding tissue were preserved and carefully handled. In all patients, a modified pad test and posterior urethral sensory threshold test were performed preoperatively and 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively and correlated with urinary continence. RESULTS: The intraoperative preservation of the seminal vesicle tip was possible in all patients in this pilot series (n = 20). In the seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy group, the continence rate was 60% after 6 weeks and 95% after 6 months. These rates were significantly higher than the continence rates in the standard prostatectomy group (18% and 82% at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively). The sensory threshold levels in the seminal vesicle-sparing group were similar to the preoperative values and were significantly lower than the postoperative threshold levels in the standard prostatectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Seminal vesicle tip-sparing radical prostatectomy may be a surgical option to preserve pelvic innervation and maintain urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Further randomized studies are necessary to elucidate the impact of seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy on restoration of urinary continence.     

Early post-prostatectomy pelvic floor biofeedback

PURPOSE: We determined whether biofeedback enhanced pelvic floor exercises begun 6 weeks after radical prostatectomy improve the early recovery of continence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized 30 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy into a group that received 5 biofeedback sessions and a control group. RESULTS: Overall 87% of patients were pad-free at 6 months with similar results in the treatment and control groups (86% versus 88%). There was no statistically significant difference in pad test results or voiding diary records in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A treatment program of biofeedback enhanced pelvic floor exercises begun 6 weeks after radical retropubic prostatectomy did not significantly affect continence in this study.     

新辅助内分泌治疗配合腹腔镜手术治疗高危前列腺癌的疗效及对控尿功能的影响

目的:观察新辅助内分泌治疗配合腹腔镜手术治疗高危前列腺癌的疗效及对控尿功能的影响。方法:选取收治的86例高危前列腺癌患者作为研究对象,遵循随机、均等原则分为对照组与观察组,其中对照组行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术,观察组在对照组基础上配合新辅助内分泌治疗。观察两组术中及术后指标、并发症发生率、生化复发率。结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量高于对照组(P0.05);观察组下床活动时间、住院时间、留置导尿管时间、肠功能恢复时间短于对照组(P0.05);观察组并发症发生率(13.95%)低于对照组(32.56%,P0.05);术后3个月、6个月,观察组控尿率高于对照组(P0.05);术后1年、2年,观察组生化复发率低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:新辅助内分泌治疗联合腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺癌可有效降低并发症发生率,改善控尿功能,但术前需对患者病情进行评估。     

Assessment of early continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: patient reported symptoms and impairment

PURPOSE: Patients considering radical prostatectomy often inquire as to when they can expect to regain urinary continence. However, there is a paucity of patient self-reported data regarding the recovery of continence during the initial 3 months after surgery. Our objectives were to assess urinary continence changes early in the postoperative period and determine which of 2 commonly used definitions of continence more closely relate to patient reported urinary impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 90 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who selected radical prostatectomy as primary therapy was conducted. Repeated measures of urinary continence as defined by 1) total urinary control, 2) the use of 1 or 0 pads daily, and 3) small or no problem with urinary function were obtained with a brief survey preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: At 56 days after removal of urethral catheters, the actuarial rates of urinary continence recovery based on definitions 1 to 3 were 43%, 84% and 82%, respectively. The use of definition 2 for continence resulted in a 1.9 times higher actuarial rate for continence recovery when compared to definition 1 at 56 days (p <0.001). However, strong agreement was observed between definitions 2 and 3 (kappa = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary control is recovered in a significant proportion of men who undergo radical prostatectomy during the initial 3 months. Continence rates will vary significantly based on the use of alternative definitions. The clinical practice of asking patients how many pads daily they use may be valid, as it corresponds well to the impairment they have.