Is Contralateral Carotid Artery Occlusion a Risk Factor for Carotid Endarterectomy?

Occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) is considered to have a significant impact on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to review one center’s experience concerning CEA opposite an occluded ICA, to see whether results differed from those obtained in patients with patent contralateral ICA in terms of relevant neurologic complication rate (RNCR, fatal + disabling stroke), stroke-free rate, and survival rate. From January 1997 to December 2002, 1,381 patients underwent a total of 1,445 CEAs at the Department of Vascular Surgery of Padua University. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included 144 patients with occlusion of the contralateral ICA and group B consisted of 1,237 patients with a patent contralateral ICA. There was no postoperative mortality in patients of group A, while in group B, two patients died as a result of myocardial infarction and cardiac failure and one died as a direct result of perioperative stroke. Postoperative disabling strokes occurred in one (0.7%) patient in group A and 10 (0.8%) patients in group B (p > 0.5). At 72 months, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of RNCR, stroke-free rate, and late death. Our results show that contralateral carotid occlusion does not reduce the safety of CEA. The efficacy in terms of RNCR, stroke-free rate, and late survival is no different in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion.     

Natural history of carotid artery occlusion contralateral to carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with carotid artery occlusion is controversial. A few studies have concluded that patients with internal carotid artery occlusion carry a high risk of neurologic events. None of these previously reported studies analyze the natural history of internal artery occlusion contralateral to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), except for a small series including a subset of patients from two randomized trials, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. This study analyzes the natural history of patients with carotid artery occlusion contralateral to CEA, specifically assessing long-term neurologic events occurring in the hemisphere associated with the occluded carotid artery. METHODS: Of the 599 CEAs in 544 patients that were included in two previously updated prospective studies, 63 patients had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion, and their perioperative and long-term outcomes were evaluated. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of freedom from late stroke occurring in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the occluded carotid artery. The stroke-free survival rate was also noted. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 58 months (range, 1 to 147 months). One perioperative stroke (1.6%) occurred, which was not in the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the occluded carotid artery. Two late strokes (3.2%) and nine transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (14.3%) occurred involving the hemisphere of the occluded carotid artery. There were also three late TIAs (4.8%) and no late strokes involving the hemisphere supplied by the operative site. There were a total of 14 late deaths. Fifteen patients had late > or =50% restenosis of the operative side. Six of these had neurologic events (TIA/stroke) involving the hemisphere of the occluded carotid artery, in contrast to five of 48 patients with no restenosis who had neurologic symptoms (P < .001). Freedom from late strokes in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the occluded carotid artery at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 98%, 96%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. The stroke-free survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 90%, 87%, 80%, and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of carotid artery occlusion contralateral to CEA is relatively benign. This may suggest a protective effect of carotid endarterectomy on the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the carotid occlusion from late strokes.     

Internal carotid artery occlusion: operative risks and long-term stroke rates after contralateral carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND. To determine the short- and long-term benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) contralateral to an occluded internal carotid (ICA), we reviewed our experience since 1976. METHODS. In 66 (13.8%) of 478 patients undergoing 544 CEAs, the contralateral ICA was occluded. Mean follow-up was 50.1 months (range, 1 to 165 months). Complete follow-up was available in 83.0% of patients. RESULTS. Operative death occurred in one (1.5%) of 66 patients with contralateral occlusion and six (1.3%) of 478 patients without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.99). Operative strokes occurred in two (3.0%) of 66 patients with contralateral occlusion and 14 (2.9%) of 478 without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.99). Life-table stroke-free rates at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 96.8%, 93.0%, and 93.0% in patients with contralateral occlusion and 95.9%, 94.2%, 91.1%, and 88.0% in patients without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.36). Five- and 8-year stroke-free rates were 100% and 100% in the asymptomatic subgroup with occlusion, 95.9% and 92.2% in the asymptomatic subgroup without occlusion (p = 0.45), 91.2% and 91.2% in the symptomatic subgroup with occlusion, and 89.7% and 86.8% in the symptomatic subgroup without occlusion (p = 0.47). Life-table survival rates at 5 and 8 years were 72.5% and 56.0% in patients with contralateral occlusion and 81.8% and 69.0% in patients without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS. CEA performed in patients with and without symptoms with a contralateral ICA occlusion produces short- and long-term mortality and stroke morbidity rates comparable to those of similar patients without contralateral ICA occlusion. The indications for CEA in patients with contralateral ICA occlusion should not differ from those applied to patients without contralateral occlusion.     

Carotid endarterectomy with routine electroencephalography and selective shunting: Influence of contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and utility in prevention of perioperative strokes

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is associated with a risk of cerebral ischemia during carotid clamping, particularly in the face of contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. We examined the results of CEA with continuous electroencephalography in patients without and with contralateral ICA occlusion. DESIGN AND SETTING: We reviewed 564 primary CEAs with routine electroencephalography and general anesthesia performed between April 1, 1989, and March 31, 1999, in a community teaching medical center. Main outcome measures were perioperative stroke, temporary lateralizing neurologic deficit, and death. Shunts were placed primarily for significant electroencephalographic changes after carotid clamping but also selectively for contralateral ICA occlusion, prior stroke, or surgeon choice. CEA was performed for asymptomatic disease in 35% of cases. RESULTS: Significant electroencephalographic changes occurred in 16% versus 39% (P <.001) and shunts were placed in 13% versus 55% (P <.001) of patients with patent (n = 507) versus occluded contralateral ICA (n = 57), respectively. The fraction of CEAs with significant electroencephalographic changes during clamping was stable, but shunt use declined slightly over time as our confidence in electroencephalography increased. Patches were placed more often (86% versus 65%; P =.002), but other operative details were similar when the contralateral ICA was occluded. Five early (30 days) strokes (0.9%) and eight early temporary postoperative neurologic events (1.4%) occurred, all ipsilateral to CEA and all after the patient left the operating room with none in patients with contralateral ICA occlusion. Two perioperative deaths occurred, one in a patient without and one in a patient with contralateral ICA occlusion. Neither of these deaths was related to ipsilateral stroke. No increase in stroke rate with decreased shunt use over time was seen. CONCLUSION: Routine use of electroencephalography was associated with apparent complete elimination of intraoperative strokes and less than 1% risk of perioperative strokes. These observations appear to be true even in the face of contralateral ICA occlusion. Electroencephalography is a sensitive detector of cerebral ischemia and a valuable tool for determination of need for shunting during CEA. Surgeons should consider routine use of electroencephalography and selective shunting for significant electroencephalographic changes with clamping.     

Management of internal carotid artery occlusion

Although attempts to restore patency of occluded internal carotid arteries are now rarely made, endarterectomy in the contralateral artery, external carotid endarterectomy and until recently EC/IC bypass have remained surgical options in the management of such patients. Over a four-year period at this institution 104 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy for stenosis. In this group the contralateral carotid was patent (Group A). Fifty-four patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion underwent contralateral endarterectomy (Group B), 8 underwent ECA/ICA bypass (Group C) and 4 an ECA endarterectomy (Group D). No statistically significant difference was noted in perioperative stroke and death rates for Groups A and B were (1% and 1%) and (3.7% and 1.9%) respectively. One Group C patient died from perioperative stroke (12.5%). For late events the life table adjusted annual rates for stroke and mortality were similar, Group A (stroke 2.1% and death 5%), and Group B (stroke 1.6% and death 5%). In Group C stroke rate was 10% and death 3%. All four patients undergoing ECA endarterectomy were relieved of their symptoms. It is concluded that in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion TEA may be performed with perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those when the opposite carotid artery is patent. The late outcome for stroke compares favorably with the reported natural history of the disease and outcome for such patients treated medically in the Joint Study of Extracranial Occlusion and EC-IC Bypass Study. External carotid artery endarterectomy appears useful in the treatment of embolic events on the occluded side. ECA/ICA bypass does not appear to confer benefit.     

Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for carotid endarterectomy? A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Although many randomized trials and other multicenter studies have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, several investigators have noted an increased rate of perioperative neurologic and cardiac morbidity in diabetic patients. To compare the perioperative outcome of CEA in diabetic patients (group I) versus nondiabetic patients (group II), we analyzed a consecutive series of CEAs performed by the same vascular surgeon at the same institution. METHODS: Data collection was prospective for all CEA procedures performed between August 1, 1992 and March 31, 1999. Group I and group II were matched for clinical presentation, percentage of internal carotid artery stenosis and indication for surgery. RESULTS: of 547 CEAs performed in 474 patients, 199 (36.4%) were in group I. Group I was younger at presentation than group II (P <.005) and women were in a higher proportion in group I than in group II (43.7% vs 27.1%, P =.0001). Although the incidence of peripheral atherosclerotic disease was comparable in the 2 groups, there was a significantly higher incidence of previous vascular surgery in group I (P =.01). Perioperative neurologic and cardiac morbidity rates were comparable in the 2 groups. The overall perioperative mortality rate was 0.5%. Long-term information was obtained in all patients (mean, 44 months; range, 1 to 75 months). No differences were found in the recurrent stenosis and occlusion rates between the 2 groups. Although there was no difference in the late mortality between the 2 groups, diabetic patients had a significantly higher cardiac-related death incidence (P =.01) than nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this analysis indicate that CEA can be performed in diabetic patients with excellent perioperative morbidity and mortality rates and late stroke-free and survival rates that are comparable with those recorded in nondiabetic patients.     

Carotid endarterectomy in women: early and long-term results

BACKGROUND: Although many randomized trials and other multicenter studies have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, including women, there is a remarkable lack of reports regarding the outcome of CEA with respect to sex. To analyze and compare the outcome of CEA in men and women in a single-group experience, we reviewed a consecutive series of 619 CEAs performed in 539 patients, 371 men (423 CEAs) and 168 women (196 CEAs). METHODS: Data collection was retrospective up to August 1, 1992 and prospective for all 405 patients treated thereafter. RESULTS: Women were significantly less likely than men to have overt evidence of coronary artery disease (P < .001) and had a significantly higher incidence of diabetes (P < .001). No perioperative death occurred in the female group (P = NS), and no statistical difference was found in perioperative stroke risk incidence. Women had a significantly higher incidence of late occlusive events (P = .01), which were all asymptomatic. No late stroke occurred in the female group (P = NS). Life-table cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 99.3%, 90.5%, 85.9%, and 82.3%, respectively, in women, and 98.9%, 91.9%, 85.2%, and 79.6% in men (log-rang P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that perioperative stroke risk and mortality rates, as well as late stroke-free, mortality, and recurrence rates, in patients undergoing CEA, are comparable in men and women. Further, larger comparative studies are necessary to provide more information on the benefit and durability of CEA in asymptomatic patients, but the results of this study suggest that the early and late outcomes are excellent and comparable in symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.     

Early and late outcomes of young patients after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid atherosclerotic disease in young adults is uncommon but may be more virulent and diffuse than in older patients. Although few studies have well established that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is of benefit for high-grade asymptomatic lesions and for moderate- and high-grade symptomatic lesions, the safety and durability of CEA in the young remain controversial. The aim of this study was to compare CEA outcome in young people with outcome in an older control group. METHODS: Thirty-five patients up to 50 years old (mean 46.5 +/- 0.5 years) and undergoing 42 CEAs were compared with a randomly selected group of 50 patients more than 60 years old (mean 68.7 +/- 0.4 years) and undergoing 55 CEAs during the same period. Data were obtained on demographics, atherosclerotic risk factors, indications for surgery, perioperative outcome, recurrent stenosis and symptoms, late stroke, and survival. RESULTS: Smoking (P < .001), alcohol consumption (P < .001), and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = .02) were more prevalent in the young patients, who were also more likely to be symptomatic at presentation (P < .001) with a higher incidence of stroke (P = .01) and contralateral carotid occlusion (P = .04). The perioperative stroke risk and mortality rates were nil for the young group. During a mean follow-up of 47 +/- 40 months, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in survival, symptom recurrence, stenosis recurrence, and reoperation rates. Young patients had a higher incidence of contralateral disease requiring surgery (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that CEA may be performed in young adults with an excellent perioperative outcome; recurrence, late stroke, and survival rates do not differ significantly from those observed among their older counterparts.     

Prospective study of carotid endarterectomy with modified polytetrafluoroethylene (ACUSEAL) patching: early and late results

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) with standard polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patching have been shown to have results comparable with those of autogenous vein patching; however, prolonged bleeding through needle holes in PTFE is a commonly recognized problem. This is the first study of CEA using a new hemostatic modified PTFE patch (GORE-TEX) analyzing the early and late outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive CEAs were entered into this protocol. All patients had an immediate postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound scan that was repeated at 1 month and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the stroke-free survival and the risk of restenosis. The mean follow-up was 21 months (range, 1 to 48 months). RESULTS: The perioperative stroke rate was 1.5% (1% ipsilateral and 0.5% contralateral, two minor strokes and one major stroke) with no perioperative mortality or perioperative carotid thrombosis. The incidence of perioperative transient ischemic attacks was 3.5% (2.5% ipsilateral and 1% contralateral). The mean hemostasis time after completion of the patching was 3 minutes, in contrast to 14 minutes for conventional PTFE (in a previous study). The rates of freedom from ipsilateral strokes at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 99%, 99%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. The cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 98%, 96%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. The rates of freedom from > or =70% restenosis at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 97%, 97%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEAs with a new modified PTFE patch are safe, have low perioperative stroke rates, are durable, and have an acceptable hemostasis time.     

Long-term survival and stroke-free survival after eversion carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis

BACKGROUND: Level 1 evidence supports carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the standard treatment for severe (>70% lumen reduction) carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients, though its safety and efficacy in high-risk patients remain controversial. Long-term survival and stroke-free survival after CEA may guide decisions concerning this procedure for asymptomatic patients, but this outcome has only been considered in few reports outside the large randomized trial setting. This study analyzed long-term survival and stroke-free survival after CEA and the impact of risk factors in a consecutive series of asymptomatic patients, including those with medical comorbidities and particular anatomical features believed to increase the perioperative morbidity and mortality of CEA. METHODS: For over 10 years, data were prospectively collected for all patients who underwent CEA for asymptomatic severe carotid disease at our institution. All CEAs performed by the same surgeon involved eversion technique, with patients under deep general anesthesia and continuous perioperative electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring for selective shunting. All patients had neurological follow-up and duplex ultrasound at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. A complete follow-up (mean, 6.1 years; range, 0.1 to 10.6 years) was obtained in 348 patients (93%) with an overall 365 CEAs (93%). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier life tables. RESULTS: Among 374 patients undergoing 391 CEAs, there were no perioperative deaths or strokes. There were 17 (4.8%) late deaths, mainly cardiac-related (70%), and 2 (0.5%) non-fatal strokes. At 5 and 10 years, survival was 96.3% and 85.7%, and stroke-free survival was 95.6% and 84.8%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (P = .002) and cardiac disease (P = .005) were independent predictors of a shorter long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Eversion CEA proved safe and effective in a series of patients with asymptomatic severe carotid disease representing the typical population of daily clinical practice. Although long-term results were extremely favorable, excellent stroke-free survival was not translated into a longer patient survival.     

Routine Shunting Is a Safe and Reliable Method of Cerebral Protection during Carotid Endarterectomy

The purpose of this report is to describe the perioperative and long-term outcomes of standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with general anesthesia, routine shunting, and patching and to show that routine shunting is a safe and reliable method of cerebral protection. Between January 1998 and December 2004, 700 patients attending our Department of Vascular Surgery underwent 786 CEAs performed using a standardized technique. Forty-four patients were excluded from the analysis because they underwent combined CEA and coronary artery bypass grafting, so the analysis is based on the results of 742 CEAs in 656 patients (86 bilateral CEAs). The strict surgical protocol included general anesthesia and standard carotid bifurcation endarterectomy with routine shunting (Javid’s shunt) and Dacron patching. The Javid shunts were easily inserted in 738 cases (99.4%) but could not be used in four cases (0.5%) because of the presence of a very small internal carotid artery. The mean ischemic time required to insert the shunt and complete the suture was 4.7 min (±1.15), and the mean time to perform the endarterectomy was 34.3 min (±6.7). The mean follow-up was 24.4 months (±17.3). Overall 30-day mortality was 0.1% (one patient) due to a contralateral major stroke. The 1-month perioperative neurological complication rate was 0.7%, with three major and two minor strokes. The cumulative stroke and death rate was 0.8%. Preoperative symptoms such as hypertension, contralateral occlusion, or an age of more than 80 years were not independent risk factors for perioperative stroke. In the long-term follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated an estimated 5-year stroke-free rate of 98.0%. There were eight cases (1%) of >70% restenosis (four cases) or thrombosis (four cases) of the operated internal carotid artery during the follow-up in asymptomatic patients: in four cases, carotid stenting due to >70% restenosis led to good results. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the restenosis-free rate was 97.8%. The combined stroke and mortality rate of 0.8%, and the restenosis rate of 1% support the argument that standard CEA performed with routine shunting as brain protection leads to excellent early and long-term results.     

Carotid endarterectomy contralateral to an occluded carotid artery: perioperative risk and late results

To define better the short-term risk and long-term benefit of carotid endarterectomy opposite an occluded carotid artery, we reviewed our experience since 1961. Angiographic data are available for 598 of 670 (89.3%) patients in our carotid registry. In 63 (10.5%) patients the internal or common carotid artery on the side opposite the endarterectomy was occluded. All operations were carried out under general anesthesia with selective shunting based on electroencephalographic criteria. Shunting was required in 29 of 63 (46.0%) patients with contralateral occlusion and 72 of 535 (13.5%) control subjects (p less than 0.0001). Perioperative strokes occurred in 3 of 63 (4.8%) patients with contralateral occlusion and 14 of 535 control subjects (2.6%) (p = 0.23). Perioperative death occurred in 0 of 63 patients with contralateral occlusion and 6 of 535 (1.1%) control subjects (p = 0.40). Life-table cumulative stroke-free rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 95.2%, 91.0%, and 76.2% in the group with contralateral occlusion and 96.0%, 89.4%, and 84.1% in control subjects (p = 0.25). Life-table cumulative survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 93.1%, 80.8%, and 75.4% in the group with contralateral occlusion and 94.8%, 77.0%, and 57.9% in control subjects (p = 0.58). Carotid endarterectomy contralateral to an occluded carotid artery may be carried out with acceptable risk and late stroke-free and survival rates comparable to those seen in other patients who have undergone carotid endarterectomy.     

Carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: is this a higher risk subgroup?

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate early and mid-term term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patient with and without contralateral carotid occlusion. METHODS: between 1996 and 1999, 1324 CEAs were performed. In 82 patients contralateral carotid artery occlusion was present (group I); 1242 patients had patent contralateral carotid (group II). All patients were operated under general anaesthesia, and selective shunting was based on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Ultrasonographic follow-up was performed at 1, 6 and 12 months and then once a year. Early results and follow-up data were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: in group I there was a significantly higher incidence of SEPs reduction and shunt insertion; however, there were no differences in terms of perioperative complications. The cumulative stroke and death rate at 30 days in group 1 and group 2 were 2.4% vs 1.4% (p=n.s.), respectively. At a mean follow-up of 15 months there were no differences between the two groups in terms of cumulative symptom-free survival. CONCLUSIONS:the presence of contralateral carotid occlusion caused an increased use of shunt, but not in early complications rates.     

A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the appropriate timing and frequency of duplex ultrasound scanning after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the detection of high-grade stenosis caused by recurrent carotid stenosis or contralateral atherosclerotic disease progression. METHODS: In 221 patients who underwent 242 CEAs, duplex scanning was performed before, during, and after operation (in 3-month to 6-month intervals). High-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (peak systolic velocity, >300 cm/s; diastolic velocity, >125 cm/s; ICA/common carotid artery ratio, >4) prompted the recommendation for repair. An average of four postoperative scanning procedures was performed during a mean follow-up period of 27.4 months. RESULTS: Intraoperative duplex scan results prompted the immediate revision of 12 repairs (4.9%), and one perioperative stroke (<1%) occurred. Six CEAs (2.7%) had asymptomatic recurrent stenosis (>50% diameter-reduction [DR]; systolic velocity, >125 cm/s) develop. Only one of six patients had >75% DR stenosis develop and underwent reoperation (<1% yield for CEA surveillance). The yield of surveillance of the unoperated ICA was higher (P =.003), and 12% of unoperated sides had progressive stenosis (n = 21) or occlusion (n = 3) develop, which led to seven CEAs for high-grade stenosis. Disease progression to >75% DR stenosis was five times as frequent (P =.002) in patients with >50% DR stenosis initially. All patients but one who required contralateral endarterectomy for disease progression had >50% ICA stenosis when first seen. During the follow-up period, no disabling strokes ipsilateral to an operated carotid artery occurred, but three strokes occurred in the hemisphere of the contralateral unoperated ICA. CONCLUSION: The yield of duplex scan surveillance after CEA was low. Only 13 patients (5.9%) had severe disease develop to warrant additional intervention. Progression of contralateral disease rather than restenosis was the most common abnormality that was identified. Duplex scanning at 1-year to 2-year intervals after CEA is adequate when a technically precise repair is achieved and minimal contralateral disease (<50% DR) is present. A policy of duplex scan surveillance and reoperation for high-grade stenosis was associated with a 1.6% incidence rate of disabling stroke during the follow-up period.     

The role of intraoperative digital subtraction angiography for quality control of standard carotid endarterectomy using patch angioplasty

The absence of technical defects is considered to be of great importance during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this context, both safe surgical technique and intraoperative quality control may be a fundamental part of the operative procedure. We have therefore undertaken a prospective study to evaluate the possible benefits of completion angiography in standard CEA using patch angioplasty. The objectives were three-fold: (1) to identify the incidence of defects requiring prompt revision; (2) to assess the perioperative stroke rate as well as the number of residual stenosis after 6 weeks in angiographically controlled patients and (3) to compare these results with a control group. From 1 January to 30 September 1999 111 patients with 115 consecutive CEAs which had completion angiography (Group A) were prospectively entered into this study. The results in group A were compared with a series of again 111 patients (Group B) which had 116 CEAs without intraoperative quality control between January and September in the year before. Surgical technique was identical in both groups. In general, risk factors were distributed evenly among both group with the exception that in group A were significantly more high-grade ipsilateral ICA stenoses while group B had more patients with diabetes and ipsilateral CT-defects. In group A, angiographic irregularities prompted us to immediate re-exploration in five patients (dilatation of severe ICA spasm 1; re-exploration of distal ICA occlusion 1; reopening of occluded ECA 3). With a 30 day mortality of 0% each perioperative stroke rate was comparable with 3/115 in group A and 3/116 in group B (P=1.0). 2/3 patients with neurological deficits in group A had early postoperative carotid thrombosis--in spite of a normal completion study. Duplex examination after 6 weeks revealed one asymptomatic ICA occlusion in each group. The incidence of residual stenosis (> or =50%) was not significantly different being 3.7% in group A and 3.2% in group B (P=0.85).When applying a safe and simple operative technique for CEA, the incidence of abnormalities warranting immediate correction appears to be a rare event and, therefore, the necessity for obligatory quality control may be questionable. On the other hand, completion DSA allows a simple documentation of the adequacy of the surgical procedure.     

The impact of an occluded internal carotid artery on the mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the presence of stenosis or an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA) influences perioperative stroke and mortality rates in patients subjected to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and July 1998, 3,344 patients (59% males; 41% females) had CABG performed at our institution. Preoperative carotid duplex scans performed by registered vascular technologists at an ICAVL accredited laboratory were available for review in all patients. Of these, 3,101 (92.7%) had < 60% ICA stenosis (group A), 182 (5.4%) had 60% to 99% ICA stenosis (group B), and the remaining 61 (1.8%) had a occluded ICA (group C). In the latter group, 53 patients (87%) had < 60% contralateral ICA stenosis, while 8 (13.1%) had significant (60% to 99%) contralateral stenoses. Concomitant carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) were performed in 70 patients in group B (40%) and in 2 patients in group C (3.2%). Age, indications for surgery, prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and smoking were similar in all groups. The mean pump time for groups A, B and C were 132, 138, and 125 minutes, respectively. The aortic cross-clamp time for group A, B, C were 78, 75, and 75 minutes, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and unpaired t test. RESULTS: Perioperative stroke rates (30 days) were 1.6%, 3.8%, and 6.5% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Group A results varied significantly from groups B (P < 0.03) and C (P < 0.003). No statistically significant difference was noted between groups B and C (P = 0.6). The presence of a contralateral ICA stenosis in group C patients was predictive of a perioperative stroke (25% versus 3.8%; P < 0.0001). Concomitant CEAs for contralateral severe ICA stenosis in group C were associated with higher stroke rate (100%) when compared with those in group B patients (4.2%; P < 0.02). Perioperative (30 days) mortality rates for groups A, B, and C were 3.6%, 6.6%, and 8.6%, respectively. The mortality rate for group A was lower than for groups B (P < 0.05) and C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The presence of an ICA occlusion increases the morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing CABG. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported large series of patients that investigates the role of carotid occlusions.     

Outcome in Patients with Symptomatic Occlusion of the InternalCarotid Artery

OBJECTIVES: to assess whether the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion has changed over the past decades, to determine risk factors for the occurrence of ischaemic stroke and to assess the risk of endarterectomy (CEA) of a severe contralateral ICA stenosis. DESIGN: retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients with symptomatic ICA occlusion were identified from duplex registry files between 1991 and 1995. Information was obtained on vascular risk factors, performance of CEA for a contralateral ICA stenosis and on recurrence of ischaemic stroke. The rate of complications occurring within 30 days after CEA of the contralateral ICA in patients with symptomatic ICA occlusion was compared with the risk of CEA in patients with asymptomatic ICA occlusion and severe contralateral ICA stenosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic). RESULTS: ninety-seven patients were identified. Mean follow-up time was 26 months. The annual risk of (non-)fatal stroke was 5.3% for all strokes (95% CI 2. 9%-9.6%) and 3.8% for ipsilateral stroke (95% CI 1.9%-7.7%). Hyperlipidaemia and severe stenosis of the contralateral ICA were independent risk factors. Twenty-two of 32 patients with a severe stenosis of the contralateral ICA underwent CEA, of which one patient died and three suffered a minor ischaemic stroke. The perioperative risk of CEA in the control group of 20 patients with asymptomatic contralateral ICA occlusion was 0% (0 of 20). CONCLUSIONS: outcome in patients with symptomatic ICA occlusion has not substantially improved over the years. CEA for severe stenosis of the contralateral ICA carried a relatively high risk in our series, but deserves to be studied in a controlled design.     

Early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy after a nondisabling ischemic stroke: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Although many retrospective and a few prospective studies have analyzed the outcome of early and delayed carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after a recent minor or nondisabling stroke (ie, a minimal and stabilized focal neurologic deficit of acute onset persisting for more than 24 hours and not leading to a handicap or to a significant impairment of daily living activities), the optimal timing of surgery remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the perioperative death and stroke rates of CEA performed within 30 days (early group) or more than 30 days (delayed group) after a nondisabling ischemic stroke in patients with carotid bifurcation disease. METHODS: During a 4-year period, of 86 patients experiencing a minor stroke, 45 were randomized to undergo early CEA and 41 to undergo delayed CEA. All patients underwent preoperative cerebral computed tomography, duplex ultrasonographic scanning and angiography of the supra-aortic trunks. All CEAs were carotid eversion endarterectomies and were performed by the same surgeon, using deep general anesthesia, with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for the selective shunting. The perioperative death and stroke rates were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No perioperative deaths occurred in either group. No recurrent strokes occurred during the waiting period in the delayed group. The incidence of perioperative stroke was comparable in the 2 groups (1 of 45, 2% vs 1 of 41, 2%). The mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 6 to 50 months). Survival rates after 1, 2, and 3 years were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early CEA after a nondisabling ischemic stroke can be performed safely with perioperative mortality and stroke rates comparable with those of delayed CEA. The timing of surgery does not seem to influence the benefit of the CEA.     

Carotid endarterectomy in the octogenarian: outcomes of 345 procedures performed from 1995-2000

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the octogenarian patient. From January 1995 to December 2000, we have performed 3430 CEAs in 2743 patients: 345 CEAs in 269 octogenarian patients (Group 1) and 3085 CEAs in 2474 younger patients (Group 2). Age was the only selection criteria for including patients in Group 1. Octogenarians' perioperative mortality (1.4%) was greater than that in Group 2 (0.3%) (p<0.05). No differences can be found between the groups' perioperative ipsilateral stroke rates (1.7% in Group 1 vs 1.2% in Group 2) and combined ipsilateral stroke and death rates (2.3% in Group 1 vs 1.3% in Group 2) (p>0.05). The octogenarians' Kaplan-Meier 6-year overall and free-stroke survival rates were 86 and 76% respectively. CEA can be performed in selected octogenarian patients with low early and late mortality and neurologic morbidity rates.     

Carotid eversion endarterectomy: perioperative outcome and restenosis incidence

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention can be performed with minimal perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. The type of surgical technique used is important to achieve optimal outcome from CEA. The purpose of this study was to analyze the perioperative and late results of carotid eversion endarterectomy (CEE) in more than 400 procedures. From August 1992 to December 1999, 402 primary CEEs were performed in 388 selected patients for symptomatic (235/58.4%) and asymptomatic (167/41.6%) carotid lesions. During the same period, 234 primary CEAs with patch closure were performed in 229 selected patients. All CEAs were carried out with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting, using deep general anesthesia. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound study and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 50 months (range 3-88). Main end points were perioperative stroke and death, and restenosis. Our results showed that use of the CEE procedure can reduce perioperative mortality and stroke risk rates to around zero and results in no restenosis.